Khilafat ya Malookiyat
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 4 ม.ค. 2024
- Why was the system of Khilafat replaced by Malookiyat (hereditary monarchy)? What was the class struggle in the Muslim world and why did it not move beyond the jagirdari nizam? What will finally break this cycle of history?
A Marxist explanation of Islamic history.
*English TH-cam: / taimurrahman1975
*Instagram: / taimur_laal
*Twitter: / taimur_laal
![อาจารย์ยอด : ลุงแว่วเล่าเรื่องผี [ผี]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Fd2Qsy4dqpM/mqdefault.jpg)
Excellent & Logical Analysis Ma-Shaa-ALLAH عزوجل ! ! ! May ALLAH عزوجل Protect all MUSLIMS especially PALESTINE from all Internal & External Enemies. Aameen ! ! ! May ALLAH عزوجل guide all of us towards his path of TRUTH. Aameen ! ! !
Sir ❤
What do you mean by excellent analysis ki Muhammad SAW baddu garib the unko power me a kar apni zamindari Banani thi ya koi unhone ek galat nizam logo ko de di k jo gareeb ho woh islam ke naam pe power me aao aur udham machao Nawoojubillah
Comment copy paste😢
@@sajidanwar8699konsa sasta nasha karta hai?
Engr Ali bhai ye bhi btaein ke is lecture mai apko konsi baat Logical and Excellent lagi hai?
Iss video mai jo baatein btae gae hain wo aik theory hai. Jis economic aspect ki baat horahi hai jiski wajah sae khilafat malookiat mai tabdeel hui uskay historical facts kia hain? Konsi books mai ye baatein sahi sanad ke sath likhi hui hain?
End par Afghanistan ke kissi gaon ki tasveer share karke keh dia hai ke Islamic movement iss tarhan ke haalaat mai paida hoti hain.
Apko in sab baaton ki wazahaat karni chahiye.
Taimor Laal you are really a Laal of a mother.thanks alot you are the one who can change this society from the ignorance to educated.
this is probably the best video u have made . thanks for this new year gift . ❤
This is the best video I have seen on TH-cam in a long while... I would thank you not only for answering some of the questions I had in my mind for a long time , but also for giving me a few questions to think about for the next few years of my life...
Thank you...
Very informative.. well explained..
You are a hero sir.❤
So blessed to have you in Pakistan ❤
Very thought provoking; one more word wonderfull. So economy & politics go side by side. Amazing explaination sir.
مطالعہ تاریخ کا رخ موڑ دیا ، خدا حفظ وامان میں رکھے، آمین
Amazing explanation…I got a new perspective today, though I always admired Moudodis explanation, now i have worn a new lens
Production and Distribution of economic resources are the keystone of islamic economic system
your analysis of Islamic history is breath taking.
phenomenal sir
Thanks for sharing a very brief overview Sir Taimur. A lot of new avenues opened in my mind but one resonating area is “Equality”. Islam always talks about equality but doesn’t oppose a system of improvements and developments. This is the reason why Rasool Allah SAWW takes Muslim’s focus more on knowledge and learning and development. Islam doesn’t stop to grow but equality is the top priority. E.g. zakat doesn’t means restricted to your wealth only but sharing your knowledge, development others, practicing patience with illiterate and foolish are also forms of Zakat. Current governments key focus is Malookiat and results will not less than khilafat e usmania.
Please share some thoughts on Islamic Economy as well
These type of questions are addressed by Ghamdi Sahab. He explains that topic in a detailed manner.
Excellent lecture and a sound analysis.
Thanks to your efforts Sir
18.00 very well argumented, and yet so simply explained
Brilliant analysis.
Tusi great o ustad muhtram.
شاندار دانشور ہیں آپ ❤
great work Sir
Excellent Janab .....what a unique analysis
Waiting for it…
Once I have red Dr Laal Khan that 8 families of Sindh owned more than 80% of agrarian lands......plz a vlog over the feudalism of Sindh n Balochistan.....
Excellent job thank you for your effort sir❤
a very useful and informative lecture thanks
My perspective on human history, from prophet Adam (AS) to the present, is that humans are driven by POWER. Power enables humans to influence and manipulate the masses.
The Quran repeatedly mentions the story of Musa and the pharaohs as a dominant theme. It illustrates how the pharaoh oppressed the weak (bani Israel) and how Musa was assigned to confront him. The Quran uses this story to warn against tyranny and injustice. This story is still relevant and played out today in every sphere of human life, as a husband he controls his wife, as a father he controls his children, as a political leader he controls his subjects. All the prophets and the Quran came to warn us against this behavior, warn us against the temptation of dominating others, whether in the family, the society, or the state. They came to teach us that we should respect the rights and dignity of every human being, and avoid the tyranny of one over another. This is THE central theme of the Quran, but sadly overlooked by many. The concept of Tawheed is also linked to it. You can only truly treat the other as an equal if you accept Allah as your lord, your motivator, your master. If this is not the case, you will make yourself a god over people and begin to control them.
What is the basis of power for different social groups?
@@Taimur_Laal
when you're at the top of social hierarchy, you assume the role of 'god' over people.
when you're at the bottom, you assume others to be your 'god'.
Two sides of the same coin, that Islam condemns!
I think this behavior is driven by negative egoistic force berried deep beneath our psyche, called arrogance (islamicaly known as nafsul ammarah).
Islam, from the time of Adam, taught fairness and equality by prioritizing the welfare of others over your own. This is the only fix for the disease of arrogance in my opinion, and to bring about a truly fair and just society.
Excellent analysis.....👍🌹❣
مولانا عبید اللہ سندھی کے تاریخ اسلام پر مقالات اس موضوع پر تفصیلی روشنی ڈالتے ہیں اور ان سوالات پر سیاسی نکتہ نظر سے راہنمائی کرتے ہیں ۔
السَّلاَمُ عَلَيْكُمْ وَرَحْمَةُ اللهِ وَبَرَكَاتُهُ !
جزاك الله خيرا !
Dear Timur, you have historical knowledge but not wisdom, if there is still life left and I meet you, I will remove the doubt that has clouded your intellect. INSHA ALLAH
Brilliant
Sir, if possible, please keep your presentation in English language. We makes notes from your lectures, and it becomes a herculian task to make notes when presentation itself is written in urdu. 😅
However, it's ok if you prefer urdu. We will manage.
Thanks for sharing your knowledge with us.
A very critical n logical analysis. Lots of love
what do you think about the Iranian revolution? Even though Iranians were not living under these mentioned conditions, they stood for the three Islamic revolutions, the 1901 constitutional Revolution against King Muzafar under the guidance of Islamic leaders, then the Ayat Ullah Kashani revolution that was taken by Musadaq, and then in 1979. while on the other hand industrialists or technology have destroyed the Environment, Water reservoirs, and Food. what do you think is the Industrial Revolution is also sustainable?
جزاک اللہ خیرا کثیرا ❤
Excellent analysis ❤❤❤
Right 👍🏼.
Bohat bara sabaq hai Sir.....
Beautifully explained simply excellent 👌
Islam provides basic principles you have to apply it everywhere.
But it doesn't mean that the Islam has nothing to do with state.
Take every good thing and apply it into state system and but the state sovereignty should be Allah.
I didn't say Islam has nothing to do with the state. That is a distortion of my view. I said the form of the state is not part of the compulsory duty within Islam. Hence, that Islam is compatible with different forms of the state.
@@Taimur_Laal Sorry sir you cleared it.❤️
Nice sir 👍
Excellent analysis
Dr Sahib, an interesting analysis. Basically fundamentalist need equitable society. In this case they could be your target audience for your red resolution if you can tailer it as per islamic needs.
So basically the Mughal - British struggle in the Indian subcontinent was a capitalist - capitalist fight. 😂
Interesting insight.
What do you think about pre-Islam arabia? How does one categorise that? And why Syed Qutb borrrowed the term of Jahiliyaa and projected it on modern democratic state?
The closest examples to Riyasat-e-madinah are the Scandinavian countries. Are Pakistanis ready to accept high taxes in exchange for social benefits, e.g., Health care, pension, etc?
To start with i will appreciate your effort to start a dissent at least. But for me you just over stretched the economic shift in those landmasses. Specifically on your original topic , i guess explanation of Sir Javaid Ahmad Ghamidi that explains the political reasoning is the other major factor to account with your analysis.
Please make this video in English as well so I can share it with my foreign friends and colleagues...
The Caliph and the Heretic by Sean Anthony
The development of the Monistic View of History
Well done
Sir, it means that the technological bases change the socioeconomic and political systems of a society.
Well taimur saahb, you have associated the entire issue of bringing back the original Islam with the economic system only. This is one of the main reasons, and I respect your views also. But we all need to understand that we didn't lose the "original Islam" because of the changes in economic system, but there were some other significant reasons like personal interest, wrong interpretation, some very horrible incidents and also some facts written in Khilafat o malookiat etc.
These are the surface manifestations of the contradiction driving the Muslim civilisation into a new stage of development.
You are a gem ustaad ❤❤❤
Pls make a video on shariat and tarikat. Difference and school of thought according to eastern and western religion. Does western religion has a shariat also?
Sir If TH-cam had a voice sending option, I would have asked some questions. However, I believe you have mixed things up, which has ultimately led to confusion.
Type it out.
❤
عمدہ تشریح
a zoom out kind of analysis but it's valid because it is zoomed out .. if we zoom in then there can be more points added in it ..overall good analysis what is missed is to use the word middle class at end of analysis for skilled industrial worker class . in present pakistani context its middle class young population vs biggest landlord in Pakistan kind of struggle . Middle class young population asking for rights from biggest landlord
Middle class is an amorphous term. Proletariat is a more definite term.
bhot khubsurat
A.o.A Sir, Mujy yay smjh nahi a rahi kay jab Islam ki Expendation hoi specially in the Era of Hazrat Umer (RA), to jageer kis kis nay banai ? or us jageer ki hadood kiya thi? kiya us ki Constitution jis ko man kr aap us jageer kay under rah saktay thy? Totaly irrelevant Comparison , Ameer ya Qareeb say jo kay Muaishi Faraq ho to us say jageer nahi banti. Jab kay bat Khilafat ki ho rahi ha jiss me Hakim ko (Badsha ko) Gareeb Adami kay Level par zindagi Guzarni hoti thi, or Malookiyat me Badsha ko Eyashi ki.
Wao wah, wah marx or hegel k hat chumnay ko dil kar raha hay or salute to you sir apne boht boht saray neurons mere dimagh me theak wiring larwai sub uljha tha thanks alot ahsan hamesha ka apka muj per. Apne wo aj sikhaya hay ek qoal yad agaya kbmuje ek lafz sikha de or muje bazar me bech de aj k baad ap muje bech saktay hen.
We love to dig history and spend our time with analysis. We are living through a period of Vilayat-e-Faqih practiced in Iran but is completely ignored it or is seen thru the lens of western/marxist perspective. While both Marxism and Maoism have failed as well.
Isn't the Iranian revolution also based on the social foundation of the Qom and a rural revolt against urban secularism of the elite. See my video on my travels in Iran.
Sir❤
what ibn e khaldoon missed was the point of Spiral movement of the the history aur circle repeat upon repeat karne me phnsa rha ?
Allah pak Pakistan or Muslmano ki hifazat kary....amieen....🤲🇵🇰🌹❣
Difference bte Republic and democracy
With due respect, your conclusion that this change from a nomadic/Bedouin way of life HAD to evolve into the "Malookiat" of Royal families is exactly what the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) had warned us against, and he told us to stay on the right path. The path of the Quran and the Alhulbait(his progeny). Islam teaches us to not get distracted by the worldly riches.
So to conclude that the Bedouin had not seen the sort of riches beforehand isn't actually true. Who were the Ummayad? Where they not the wealthy Arabs of Mecca? Did they not make money from the annual "pilgrimage" of all the arabs and their hundreds of different Gods?
I think Maulana Maududi's thesis that the Ummayads hijacked the Islamic revolution and turned it into their "Malookiat" was spot on!
professor sahb mao zedong k socialist movement k baad bookh se mry 4 crore logon ko b mention krty, aur russia k socialist movement ki waja se economic situation ki bhi bt kren, is wqt k socialist states veitnam, cuba k halat ko mention krty. sir, govt supermacy k halat pakistan m dekh chuky hn hum k departments kese tabah h gae. aur west ki economic boost aur global world order ko control krny ki waja hi industrialization aur privatization h. wrna governments to aty hn srf khany k liye.
In fact, it is the opposite. Socialist china ended hunger.
21:00 there are some similarities between your perspective and that of ghamidi sb. After examining the hundreds of views of this sensitive topic, I agree with You. You are a good teacher. It is the triumph of logical reasoning that I agreed to your perspective. Otherwise, I become anxious and feels like that I am loosing my 'Iman' whenever I read/watch/listen the opinion of religious scholars on this topic.
How is is logically reasoned ? This is the old age Marxist perspective.
Ghamdi sb doesn't do any economic analysis that I"m aware of. His main work is to correctly interpret the scripture. He has never claimed to be a historian as such.
@@Taimur_Laal You are right Sir.
@@learningtape bro when you say ''the trump of logical reasoning'' it means MARXISM's dialectical analysis of history essentially confining entire logical reasoning to a single ideology. what i want to say is even a liberal/realist may claim to apply the same logical reasoning but arrive at completely different conclusions.
thats logical
Amazing analysis
to kIya Khilafat lanay kay liye Chotay Kisan, Ghareeb, or Badho ban jain?
watch the full video he answered your question in the end. what we need to do to come out of this cycle.
@@crumpfyllc5571 Brother me nay mukamal Video Dakhi ha ,,, is say kuch b nahi honay wala, bhai Sab hi War kr rhaay hain bilkhasoos Insaniyat kay alum bardar ,,, bus hamay kahtay hain kay tum karo gay to Terrorist ban jao gay ,,, hum jo marzi karain ,,, ajeeb bat ha MUsalman ko Qiyam say roknay kay liye usay bus kahaniyan karai ja rahin
Tameur built tower of human heads of 17 million people. Please distance from the name of Tameur!
Afghanistan is not a good example for us as an Islamic government.
In history we have seen how the people fought for Islamic revolution and then they did the same as the former did.
For us the only example is hazrat Omar who did not distribute the land among the soldiers but it was saved for the nation and for the future. By himself never bought a cloth to wear as Allah has said that if you are khalifa and have your own sources of income still you took the salary for doing the job then you should be embarrassed
جناب جو اپ نے محرکات بیان کی ہیں دراصل ان محرکات کے پیچھے لالچ حرص مغروریت امریت والی سوچ ہوتی ہے
اس کے علاوہ یہ تمام محرکات جو اپنے اوپر بیان کیے ہیں وہ ماضی قدیم میں تو ممکن تھے لیکن دور حاضر میں جب معیشت صرف زراعت اور تجارت نہیں بلکہ اور بہت سارے دوسرے عوامل پر مشتمل ہوتی ہے لہذا یہ فارمولا اب ایپلیکیبل نہیں رہا
I want to make a live session with you.. Regarding same topic
Sir i have one question. Who do you think in Islamic world is dragging us to the nomadic system? Or to the feudal system? Every country is progressing. Every Islamic country understands AI & tech are the future. KSA, UAE, other gulf states moving from oil based economy. Nobody is going to the nomadic life. Even if the caliphate is reinstated it will pursue modern policies. Your argument Islamic system needs to move from the nomadic & feudal lifestyle. It HAS moved.
Taimur Laal Sir, I am From India and I want learn something rise and fall of Communism in india
اگر سرمیاہ دارانہ نظام ہی کسی جمھوری ریاست کے انھدام کی جڑ ہے تو زرا بتائیے آج امریکہ، برطانیہ، فرانس اور اسپین سے بڑے جاگیردار کہاں پائے جاتے ہی؟ دنیا کے کس گوشہ میں ان اصولوں کی بنیاد پر ریاست قائم کی گئ ہے جو قائم و دائم ہے،جن کی بات آپ کر رہے ہیں؟
HOW TO I TALK WITH YOU SIR PLEASE GUIDE ME
❤❤❤❤ पाकिस्तान की शान है तैमूर जी
❤❤❤
Taimoor Bhi Achha analysis ha lakin agar ajj ke dor main jaageer daari ko khatam kerna ho to ajj ka business mind interested ki waja se mazeed aik nai taqseem aaqa or maalik ki taqseem paida kerta ha jis ki waja se aik or tabqaati system devolp hogaya ha
❤❤
Status quo k khilaf jang jeetne k ba'd.... status quo change nhi kiya jata balkay change of government mn bdal diya jata hy .... common masses ko ist'mal kar liya jata hy .... feudal ZA Bhutto ne bhi yhi kaam kiya..... betrayal from his promises.....India ki tarha land reforms hi kar jata.....
salaam, based on your explanation here. could you comment on the revivalist movements of Muslim brotherhood (Egyptian) and current JI? Both are Urban movements whose members are university degree holders.
Assalamualaikum sir. Aap na molana madudi sb ka hawalla diya. Kindly Dr. Taha husaain from Egypt ke books b prhain. Ye books molana sb ke book se zyada detail ma hn.
@@armaanzikria7019
اصل مسلۂ بھی یہ ہے کہ خلافت و ملوکیت کا ذکر کرتے وقت اس بات کو بھی مد نظر رکھنا چاہیے کہ روم و فارس کی سلطنتوں نے اسلام سے بدلہ کیسے لیا۔۔۔ ان کی اشرافیہ نے کیسے مسلمان خلفاء کو قتل کروا کر مسلمانوں کو جنگوں میں ڈال کر دوبارہ اشرافیہ کلچر پروان چڑھایا
Assalamualaikum sir. Aap na molana madudi sb ka hawalla diya. Kindly Dr. Taha husaain from Egypt ke books b prhain. Ye books molana sb ke book se zyada detail ma hn.
Sir, please make a video on " Why do Islamists political parties always lose elections in Pakistan?
❤❤❤❤❤ ❤❤❤
sir these are more healthy then urban areas
Maulana Maududi has discussed all this in Chapter 5 of The Book you mentioned.
Capitalism ,Feudal lords
Also read the difference of policies btw khulafa and Malik .
There was no capitalism till the 16th century. It would be absurd to subscribe this transformation to capitalism.
👍👍👍
If landless class couldn't break that circle, how labor class will do.. I think situation is still the same lords vs peasant and capitalist vs workers... kindly explain this
Because landless class was not based on the advanced means of production. It could not create an advanced economy.
روس خود ایک انڈسٹریل اسٹیٹ بنکر ایک استحسالی نظام میں تبدیل ھوا
I don't know if I'm making a wrong comparison but just asking it from a learning perspective.
Why is that when britishers came to subcontinent, they were the ones who ruled us and masses in the subcontinent adopted a large part of their culture, language, governing method(which we can even see today in the form kay angraiz chalay gaye aur yeh chor gaye and stuff) but in this case the settlers (or colonialist?) adopted the culture and governing method of the population there.
Correct me if I'm wrong
An excellent question. The anwer is that the British were already at a higher level of economic development than India. Hence, India adopted their culture rather than the other way around.
@@Taimur_Laal But sir, the fact is that The Indian subcontinent region was estimated to be the 2nd largest in the world in economic terms in 1600, only below China & under Mughal Emperor's Aurangzeb Indian subcontinent became the world's largest economy.
Many Historians point to East India company rule as a major factor in both India's deindustrialization and Britain's Industrial Revolution ( During the colonial rule, Indian industry suffered losses and their industries prospered...)
India accounted for 25% of the world's industrial output in 1750, declining to 2% of the world's industrial output in 1900.Britain replaced India as the world's largest textile manufacturer in the 19th century. In terms of urbanization, Mughal India had a higher percentage of its population (15%) living in urban centres in 1600 than British India did in the 19th century.
And I am quoting Dr. Manmohan singh statement - There is no doubt that our grievances against the British Empire had a sound basis. As the painstaking statistical work of the Cambridge historian Angus Maddison has shown, India's share of world income collapsed from 22.6% in 1700, almost equal to Europe's share of 23.3% at that time, to as low as 3.8% in 1952. Indeed, at the beginning of the 20th century, "the brightest jewel in the British Crown" was the poorest country in the world in terms of per capita income.
Thats why they came for their own prosperity and looted Indian subcontinent
All true. But what you are leaving out is that India had achieved all this on the basis of a jagirdari nizam. Which by the 18th century had become outdated. Britain had already developed a capitalist system. Which, as history showed, far surpassed the achievements of the feudal system.
@@thetruth5488
خلافت سے ملوکیت میں تبدیلی شخصیات نہیں بلکہ اصولوں کی تبدیلی سے ہوئی اور یہ بات تفصیلاً مولانا مودودی نے بیان کی ہے
Beautifully explained the essence of historical materialism with the reference of Islam. Zindabad marxist reductionist
THIS IS A WORLD WHERE NOTHING IS SOLVED. SOMEONE ONCE TOLD ME, TIME IS A FLAT CIRCLE. EVERYTHING WE'VE EVER DONE OR WILL DO, WE'RE GONNA DO OVER AND OVER AND OVER AGAIN.
Dear Taimur ji ,you can not change Pakistanis. They will change with the passage of time, may be in 2000 years.
ایران ڈاکٹر صاحب کے تمام ارگیومنٹ کو نل کررھا ھے۔۔۔۔
❤❤❤❤