MyHeritage actively steals genealogy info generated by free services, sometimes even trying to sell you ancestral info that you yourself found while doing hard research on another platform. Per a user on Reddit who visited their offices a year or two back, the company is based out of a "boiler room" style office. It's also been said that, as soon as the company has your contact information, they'll hound, call, and pester users for more money.
Wouldn't it have been more practical to invade using cargo ships and converted civilian airliners? They would appear as standard vessels and can carry enormous quantities of men and supplies.
Just found this channel and thanks for all the laughs. Analyst here, and the Russian sub thumbnail baited me in. I should say, now that the rest of the world can see how pathetic Russian war machines are nothing more than a Dollar General(a cheap store for poor people in America) to equate their projects. I really wished they tried to build any of these subs. Cutting to the good part: would one of these subs actually make it to our shores? No. 😅😂 If anyone is alarmed by these projects, rest assured that Russia has destroyed itself internally. Most of their remaining stock has been depleted in Ukraine. If they can recover fiscally, it will be decades before they are a threat to others...and by others, NATO countries, not former Soviet states. It was great for you to deliver this without laughing the entire time.
Project 621 was intended to carry T-34s, not T-35s. The T-35 is a failed multi-turreted heavy tank from the 1930s whereas the T-34 was a widely successful medium tank which would've been much more suited given its size and smaller crew.
IJN cruiser submarines like Type-B1were carrying scout planes since 1940s, they even made 3 x I-400 Class carrier submarine carrying 3 x large fighter bombers..
@@MichaelBailey-y1d And the Japanese should be Buying the British a beer... Check out the British M-Class Submarine. M1 (1918) = 305mm Battleship gun, M2 (1925) = Aircraft Carrier. On that note... @FoundAndExplained... there's a unique video for you. Few have talked about it in detail.
USA had a submarine "Project Conform" at about the same time. It has gone more into stealth direction. Some of the futuristic projects by France are going in this direction too. Would be nice to see something about this kind of submarines here.
Pretty sure they can start them when the doors are open and after the troops are ashore. Not like they are going to be landing under fire... it's meant for a stealth landing
@@Kraken_Mybutt This design is not possible, as someone who works on subs i can tell you this design is a flop. It says 700 crew, with all that load there inst enough room to fit that many people, you'd need a submarine that like at least a quarter to half a mile feet long. Plus you wouldn't start the tanks in compartment because the fumes would literally just kill the sailors, you couldn't expel that much contaminated air while under the surface. Besides this cant be a stealth mission, the size of this sub and the propulsion would be so fucking loud.
@@Jeremy-su5yq fair enough. But no need to carry vehicles... the Belgorod is already 600 feet long and the US loses track of it all the time. They could fit a whole lot of soldiers in that.
@@Kraken_Mybutt The Belgorod is built for ~100 submariners. And that’s to keep the submarine operational. It can’t carry more than a couple fully geared soldiers. It’s just not designed to.
I knew when I was 10 that I wasn't crazy for building Lego™ amphibious assault submarines! Planes included, top was the flight deck with a sealed hangar below, but with a smaller capacity than a regular aircraft carrier. It was awesome.
So todays video we put a ton of work into! it took some very talented people many weeks to make and I hope you appreciate it :) thanks so much for watching!
I think the missions of these subs can be found in the book, Red Storm Rising where instead of subs, civilian ships masquerading as US ones but filled with paratroopers in the inside.
@@datadavisno the Soviet Airborne troops were used because they were an elite unit. They came ashore on hover craft and easily overran the (Company or maybe it was a battalion) US Marines on Iceland. The base had also been hit very hard by cruise missiles. I do wonder what the status of Soviet Naval Infantry was in the 1980’s and why they were not used in the novel.
Few and under equipped. The Russian (and by extension Soviet) Navy and everything related to it has always been poorly trained and funded (with the exception of it's Soviet era submarine fleet).
Project 626 to me by far seems like the most reasonable and viable idea of all these. It solves a problem, offers novel landing capability, doesn't gold plate itself with tangential things that could tank the program, and of course isn't nuclear powered.
Especially given the absolutely appalling safety record of Soviet/Russian submarines, even when they don't have whole battalions of troops and all their ammo onboard
Popular Mechanics did a few articles on conceptual transport submarines, including one back in the 00s on a similar infantry carrier submarine. I think they called it the Commando Attack Sub, and it was designed to carry Marines in its big, bloated body and deploy fast attack boats to get them to shore.
A sub that big, especially a Soviet/Russian sub, would be very noisy. That means it would easily be detected and modern torpedoes are sonar homing. There's no way the Soviets could have kept those things a secret and once the secret was out the US would have, (assuming it hadn't already) ringed any vulnerable base with acoustic sensors to detect them approaching. After detection, helicopters could pinpoint the sub and drop homing torpedoes on it. So this is one of those ideas that sounds cool for a movie or video game, but would fail hard in real life.
Not going to lie. Of all the projects that I've seen on this channel, I'd say this is one of the few that could actually work with a bit of modern-day reworking!
I’m honestly surprised they have never made giant land based or submarine destroyer/aircraft carriers. Massive and slow, but built to just be almost invincible.
USA has underwater detection systems around it. So submarines approaching it would most likely be detected. Noise the submarine makes underwater would be enough alone to get detected.
I'd imagine that such a super-sub would be extremely noisy, and easily picked up on sonar. Plus, a sub that big, probably couldn't dive that deep compared to other subs. The long the sub is, the harder it is to make a hull that can resist pressure laterally.
This is a great film. But I do wonder about the practicalities. Not just in finding appropriate landing approaches but the fact your still going to need a serious follow-up force close behind, bringing up logistics, exploitation forces etc. But a very interesting idea!
It would have been very impractical to have submarine like the 717 but not gonna lie if I was on a beach and I saw that submarine intentionally beat itself, I would be shitting bricks
"...deploying troops and tanks, plus 2 anti aircraft guns right in the middle of an enemy force, which is just plain cool!" So Russia starting it's invasion in the arctic and attacking the U.S., likely leading to all out nuclear war would be "cool"?
I mean, it sou ds good, but a couple factors come up against this design immediately- Amphibious landing craft have a crazy small amount of draft, whereas Subs are the model of deep draft. Also, can you imagine trying to clean/scrub and or generate the amount of breathing air required for over 700 people?
The data on the US one should be declassified, however I recall hearing about this recently. The US Started an effort to build an undersea aircraft carrier in WWII, but it missed the war and they couldn't figure out the hatch, but they kept working on it as a troop transport but determined it wasn't worth it. So they opted to abandon it in favor surface ships because they figured it would be too big to be practical. But they do use it for marines and seal teams.
All this thing is missing is a nuclear capable main rail cannon that when stowed is part of an aircraft runway. 1 million lives lost to save ten million.
Dude, you completely missed IJA cargo submarine force consist of Type-3 'Maru - Yu' boats, design to transport 23 tons of freight & 40 troops, nearly 400 planned but 38 went out of production into action, you cannot miss this part of history when talk about cargo submarines.
@@kalebthehistorian5928 Who, Scott Ritter the twice convicted child diddler? Or Elon Muskovite going through his middle-life crysis? The cesspool is large and a couple of Lord Haw Haws fiercely supporting Russia’s invasion won’t change anything
@@kalebthehistorian5928A war intended to last a couple of weeks has stretched on for years. Perhaps you and other analysts believe it’s hopeless, but it’s gone far worse for Russia than they originally expected, and still haven’t won.
It's interesting the amount of brain gymnastics both sides of the Cold War performed in order to gain and edge in nuclear delivery capabilities, and how so much of that work became obsolete the moment ICBMS came into play.
I don't think they ever thought of using them by popping out " in the middle of ennemy forces " that would be incredibly stupid, and kills the very purpose of being sneaky ;) Amazing concept and video though. The submarine cargo projects, another old idea, will likely make a return.
Russia should focus on simple stuff like better ammo packaging. Standardized logistics systems. Not as sexy as mega projects like this sub but what makes a campaign sustainable.
Underwater transport submarines, interesting concept an upgrade on the Japanese I-400 meant to carry attack planes. Maybe not so far fetch in the real world but scaled down for drones maybe?.
Would have never worked! During the cold war no Russian subs ever left port without a US escort! We tracked them with our P-3's, S-3's and Attack subs...they were never alone!
large sub, worthless as most ideal landing beaches have long shallow shores making it most likely for the large sub to beach itself easily. small sub, tanks do not easily/quickly move sideways from a tight confined space and likely the ice could not even support the tank where the sub has to break through thin layers only.
Boy! There are a lot of people crapping all over this thing, saying sawed-off shotguns are a better solution. Nonsense! I think a variant of this baby would be awesome to have on hand. I can see a variant made with six barrels that fired two at a time! Maybe have one designed that fired a 20mm cannon round with a proximity fuse in it! (expensive!)
Man, it would have been awesome if they'd built some of those! The fact that they built the Ekranoplans proves that everything was on the table for these nut jobs!
I’m no military strategist, but even I know that an expeditionary military operation isn’t hard because it’s hard to get the tip of the spear there; it’s hard because you need to keep them supplied. So you get a half of a BTG to North America. Fine. All they have with them is enough supplies for at best 3 days of fighting. Probably much less. There’s no version of this where it would be anything more than a harassing tactic, and it would be understood to be a one way ticket to America for everyone.
It still wouldnt be enough n they know that. Plus it would cost way too much money just to build aside from the costs if destroyed and time it would take to build them
Love found and explained and want us to make more videos like this? Then check out our sponsor MyHeritage + 14-day free trial
bit.ly/FoundandExplained
MyHeritage actively steals genealogy info generated by free services, sometimes even trying to sell you ancestral info that you yourself found while doing hard research on another platform. Per a user on Reddit who visited their offices a year or two back, the company is based out of a "boiler room" style office. It's also been said that, as soon as the company has your contact information, they'll hound, call, and pester users for more money.
We are all fail junkies. Please do a video on the politics and logistic fails behind the Australian SSN-AUKUS submarine program.
Wouldn't it have been more practical to invade using cargo ships and converted civilian airliners? They would appear as standard vessels and can carry enormous quantities of men and supplies.
Just found this channel and thanks for all the laughs. Analyst here, and the Russian sub thumbnail baited me in. I should say, now that the rest of the world can see how pathetic Russian war machines are nothing more than a Dollar General(a cheap store for poor people in America) to equate their projects. I really wished they tried to build any of these subs. Cutting to the good part: would one of these subs actually make it to our shores? No. 😅😂 If anyone is alarmed by these projects, rest assured that Russia has destroyed itself internally. Most of their remaining stock has been depleted in Ukraine. If they can recover fiscally, it will be decades before they are a threat to others...and by others, NATO countries, not former Soviet states. It was great for you to deliver this without laughing the entire time.
A Bendigo lad.
Sounds like granddad was a bend and go to by the sounds of
Project 621 was intended to carry T-34s, not T-35s. The T-35 is a failed multi-turreted heavy tank from the 1930s whereas the T-34 was a widely successful medium tank which would've been much more suited given its size and smaller crew.
Thanks for the correction
Uses T-34/85 3D models, writes T-35. 🤦♂️.
I caught that too.
@@CAP198462to be fair post war the only T-34 variant worth anything was the T-34/85
@@jameson1239 i mean that goes for basically any tank with a lot of gradually improved variants, the newest will be the best
The T-34 was the most mass produced tank of WW2. That's the only thing it had going for it. Well, that and German stupidity.
Fun fact: there are more planes in the ocean than submarines in the sky.
that IS a fun fact
Not if you look at aircraft as submarines that can fly.
Planes are basically submarines because theyre cylinder shaped
What a surprise!
@@realherobrine5636basically both are pressurized and air locked so yeah
12:00 please tell me im not the only one who hears him say "717" funny
Sounds like he accidentally said "171" and then dubbed it over
@@HugoLumanthats it.
you aren't..
@@HugoLumansounded more like a stitching of the audio kinda like YTPs.
Me too 😂
Maybe a Mix Misstak? 😅
Japan: It's crazy to think we can fit a plane into a submarine😬😬😬
USSR: hold my vodka👹👹👹
I think it's the Russians who should be buying the IJN a beer! Check out the WW2 Japanese submarine class I-400, which carried 3 Aichi M6As.
Hold my palinka
The difference is that the Japanese Imperial Navy actually built and deployed submarine aircraft carriers; the Russians just dreamed…
IJN cruiser submarines like Type-B1were carrying scout planes since 1940s, they even made 3 x I-400 Class carrier submarine carrying 3 x large fighter bombers..
@@MichaelBailey-y1d And the Japanese should be Buying the British a beer...
Check out the British M-Class Submarine. M1 (1918) = 305mm Battleship gun, M2 (1925) = Aircraft Carrier.
On that note... @FoundAndExplained... there's a unique video for you. Few have talked about it in detail.
The fact that one of the designs is called "Project 626" itches that Disney movie part of my brain.
It had me in Stitches.
It's not that special to be honest, they named a good deal of their naval projects "Project #"
Jumba describes his "evil experiment" it with his Russian accent.
[Palpatine has entered the chat]
Looks like something out of the C&C Red Alert Series.
Please don't remind me of those good old days ..... EA has ruined C&C
About as practical too.
The Russian Ukrainian war is just the first level of the upcoming RA game.
Freedom Fighters.
literally opens with these subs.
That's no accident. "What if the crazy Cold War projects actually worked?" is the fundamental premise of Red Alert.
Assault submarine. That phrase is chilling.
The ballast tanks would have to be huge on these for it to be able to submerge after unloading its cargo.
Basically a real life Ulysses but without the mini submarine pods
Why are submarines getting crazier and crazier with every episode on this channel 😅
USA had a submarine "Project Conform" at about the same time. It has gone more into stealth direction. Some of the futuristic projects by France are going in this direction too.
Would be nice to see something about this kind of submarines here.
I've seen T-72s on startup. You want to put them in an airtight container? RIP, sailors.
Pretty sure they can start them when the doors are open and after the troops are ashore. Not like they are going to be landing under fire... it's meant for a stealth landing
have you seen them turret toss though?
@@Kraken_Mybutt This design is not possible, as someone who works on subs i can tell you this design is a flop. It says 700 crew, with all that load there inst enough room to fit that many people, you'd need a submarine that like at least a quarter to half a mile feet long. Plus you wouldn't start the tanks in compartment because the fumes would literally just kill the sailors, you couldn't expel that much contaminated air while under the surface. Besides this cant be a stealth mission, the size of this sub and the propulsion would be so fucking loud.
@@Jeremy-su5yq fair enough. But no need to carry vehicles... the Belgorod is already 600 feet long and the US loses track of it all the time. They could fit a whole lot of soldiers in that.
@@Kraken_Mybutt The Belgorod is built for ~100 submariners. And that’s to keep the submarine operational.
It can’t carry more than a couple fully geared soldiers. It’s just not designed to.
I was not expecting the Doctor Who clip, but it is very on point for not just this project, but Cold War era thinking in general.
I knew when I was 10 that I wasn't crazy for building Lego™ amphibious assault submarines! Planes included, top was the flight deck with a sealed hangar below, but with a smaller capacity than a regular aircraft carrier. It was awesome.
Man, does that sub sound like a unit from C&C for surprise attacks. That would be nice ...
They can barely invade their neighbors.
So todays video we put a ton of work into! it took some very talented people many weeks to make and I hope you appreciate it :) thanks so much for watching!
Thank you for the effort, I really appreciate it. 👍
Looks great!
Project 626 realistically would have no way to unload T-34s off that loading ramp as they completely lack neutral steering and cannot turn in place
this is both untrue and also irrelevant
you don't need to neutral steer to turn, and they just have to drive in a straight line in and out
Stop using common sense lol. Biased, pro Russian military people will get upset with you lol 😂
The vultures have been fed and the world has seen our might. Now, clear the skies.
I guess this is where Kojima got his inspiration for Arsenal Gear
I think the missions of these subs can be found in the book, Red Storm Rising where instead of subs, civilian ships masquerading as US ones but filled with paratroopers in the inside.
were they gonna parachute from the ships?
The invasion of Texas will be hilarious.
@@datadavisno the Soviet Airborne troops were used because they were an elite unit. They came ashore on hover craft and easily overran the (Company or maybe it was a battalion) US Marines on Iceland. The base had also been hit very hard by cruise missiles.
I do wonder what the status of Soviet Naval Infantry was in the 1980’s and why they were not used in the novel.
Few and under equipped. The Russian (and by extension Soviet) Navy and everything related to it has always been poorly trained and funded (with the exception of it's Soviet era submarine fleet).
I can't wait to see the Bear Transports for the war-bears !
Yes, completely undetectable. Laughes in hydrophone, chuckles in active ping sonar, giggles in sub hunter, hahas in intelligence gathering.
“717!” 😂 12:02
It said 171 and had to cut it out hahah
I can’t imagine the logistical nightmare of feeding hundreds of troops in a tiny metal tube
"621...why are you underwater theres not any coral there get back to work"
Project 626 to me by far seems like the most reasonable and viable idea of all these. It solves a problem, offers novel landing capability, doesn't gold plate itself with tangential things that could tank the program, and of course isn't nuclear powered.
Those Soviet invasion subs are a James Bond movie's dream come true!
1:25 Why is georgia not a part of Soviet Union on the map?
Look like really expensive coffins.
Especially given the absolutely appalling safety record of Soviet/Russian submarines, even when they don't have whole battalions of troops and all their ammo onboard
Submarines are so fascinating. You think the german type 21 would make an appearance in this channel?
Popular Mechanics did a few articles on conceptual transport submarines, including one back in the 00s on a similar infantry carrier submarine. I think they called it the Commando Attack Sub, and it was designed to carry Marines in its big, bloated body and deploy fast attack boats to get them to shore.
Haha that doctor who scene turns out perfect for this
I love these to show up as an enemy in an Ace Combat game, I can imagine some pretty good setpiece battles around the concept.
8:00 How tf this tank was to get out of this place?
Imagine if one of those giant submarines, fully loaded, was hit by a torpedo.
And the torpedo *exploded*
Thats partly why you have interlocks and watertight compartments. Section off areas of the boat and allow at least a chance for an emergency blow.
@@Jeremy-su5yq I doubt this would do much good against a *torpedo* .
Even a near miss would be enough to buckle every section of the pressure hull.
@@Jeremy-su5yqThe problem is that a lot of those garages were just one big open compartment by the looks of the designs.
A sub that big, especially a Soviet/Russian sub, would be very noisy. That means it would easily be detected and modern torpedoes are sonar homing. There's no way the Soviets could have kept those things a secret and once the secret was out the US would have, (assuming it hadn't already) ringed any vulnerable base with acoustic sensors to detect them approaching. After detection, helicopters could pinpoint the sub and drop homing torpedoes on it. So this is one of those ideas that sounds cool for a movie or video game, but would fail hard in real life.
@@Jeremy-su5yq this is a very interesting idea until you lack the structural integrity to have both halves of the ship stay together
The 717 just reminds me of 'the pentagon wars'. On paper, it can do everything! In practice, I imagine it would be a nightmare to live and work aboard
Not going to lie. Of all the projects that I've seen on this channel, I'd say this is one of the few that could actually work with a bit of modern-day reworking!
Wait … the torpedos fired backward?
I’m honestly surprised they have never made giant land based or submarine destroyer/aircraft carriers. Massive and slow, but built to just be almost invincible.
USA has underwater detection systems around it. So submarines approaching it would most likely be detected. Noise the submarine makes underwater would be enough alone to get detected.
Nope
You forget to inlude Gergia into USSR at 1:39
I'd imagine that such a super-sub would be extremely noisy, and easily picked up on sonar. Plus, a sub that big, probably couldn't dive that deep compared to other subs. The long the sub is, the harder it is to make a hull that can resist pressure laterally.
This Idea is just so dumb...Even if you got on Shore, you needed hundreds of these Things.
To carry enough Troops, and to supply these Troops.
Yeah this had no chance to ever succeed
This is a great film. But I do wonder about the practicalities. Not just in finding appropriate landing approaches but the fact your still going to need a serious follow-up force close behind, bringing up logistics, exploitation forces etc. But a very interesting idea!
This is such a good video!
Thanks for watching!
It would have been very impractical to have submarine like the 717 but not gonna lie if I was on a beach and I saw that submarine intentionally beat itself, I would be shitting bricks
Knowing how well their one aircraft carrier is working out something tells me this never would have made it out the harbor.
"...deploying troops and tanks, plus 2 anti aircraft guns right in the middle of an enemy force, which is just plain cool!"
So Russia starting it's invasion in the arctic and attacking the U.S., likely leading to all out nuclear war would be "cool"?
How have I never heard of this
I love TH-camrs like you and mustard
6:45 348 tons is not equal to 3,480 tons
An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come.
That animations are soo great!!!
Huge reason why Japanese I-400 class cruiser subs were scrapped immediately after the war to avoid the technology falling into Soviets hands.
Hey the next Submarine video you could make is about the IJN I-400 from WW2. It be cool to see you do a video on it.
I mean, it sou ds good, but a couple factors come up against this design immediately- Amphibious landing craft have a crazy small amount of draft, whereas Subs are the model of deep draft. Also, can you imagine trying to clean/scrub and or generate the amount of breathing air required for over 700 people?
The data on the US one should be declassified, however I recall hearing about this recently. The US Started an effort to build an undersea aircraft carrier in WWII, but it missed the war and they couldn't figure out the hatch, but they kept working on it as a troop transport but determined it wasn't worth it. So they opted to abandon it in favor surface ships because they figured it would be too big to be practical. But they do use it for marines and seal teams.
All this thing is missing is a nuclear capable main rail cannon that when stowed is part of an aircraft runway. 1 million lives lost to save ten million.
The first submarine project 'Number Tag' got me by surprise, I've seen too much Internet brainrot and I apologize for that...
Don't worry, Operation: Infinite Walrus and it's greatest soldier, Bill Dauterive will stop those submarines from coming over the Arctic.
Its a shame they fave him that evil placebo drug.
I want one of these, but not for warfare. Would be nice as a post-collapse self-sustainable home in the sea.
Dude, you completely missed IJA cargo submarine force consist of Type-3 'Maru - Yu' boats, design to transport 23 tons of freight & 40 troops, nearly 400 planned but 38 went out of production into action, you cannot miss this part of history when talk about cargo submarines.
It sounds a bit funny when you realize Russia can’t even win in its own backyard, let alone reach continents away
The Russians aren't the Soviet Union, you numpty, but both they and the Ukraine were once apart of it.
USSR is not = russia
Define "Can't Win" when pretty much everyone except Ukraine and certain "Experts" has basically said its hopless at this point.
@@kalebthehistorian5928 Who, Scott Ritter the twice convicted child diddler? Or Elon Muskovite going through his middle-life crysis? The cesspool is large and a couple of Lord Haw Haws fiercely supporting Russia’s invasion won’t change anything
@@kalebthehistorian5928A war intended to last a couple of weeks has stretched on for years. Perhaps you and other analysts believe it’s hopeless, but it’s gone far worse for Russia than they originally expected, and still haven’t won.
Project 626 wow its literally named after stitch from LILO and stitch
I think you meant 59,000 tonns of displacement
🤣🤣🤣He said, the Soviet Union has A
problem, and I’m like
ONLY 1🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
It's interesting the amount of brain gymnastics both sides of the Cold War performed in order to gain and edge in nuclear delivery capabilities, and how so much of that work became obsolete the moment ICBMS came into play.
Man give it a railgun and it’s the Alicorn from AC7
In those days you normally had 1 bunk bed per 3 sailors in a sub. So 1 per 4 men isn't that bad, people would be getting 6 hours of sleep
guys do you think if the russians had invented kellogs cereal instead of vodka they would already
Tbh this wasnt as a stupid idea as many would think I think this is pretty darn smart
Awesome video mate! But a small typo at 6:44. I have no idea how a 348 tonne submarine would be able to carry IS-3 heavy tanks!
It can't with that time current technology. It can submerge but cannot float.
Did they finally patch the screen doors on these tubs??
I don't think they ever thought of using them by popping out " in the middle of ennemy forces " that would be incredibly stupid, and kills the very purpose of being sneaky ;)
Amazing concept and video though.
The submarine cargo projects, another old idea, will likely make a return.
Oh no, Sub 626's only weakness is water. Its molecular structure cannot survive
That idea is nuttier than squirrel turds. What happens when they run out of ammo?
10x T-35 seems wrong...those were huge ''landship'' tanks...probably meant T-34
But, how many battle bears could it deploy? ;p
Russia should focus on simple stuff like better ammo packaging. Standardized logistics systems. Not as sexy as mega projects like this sub but what makes a campaign sustainable.
Ya know if we ever got.A red alert 3 they should have include these things
Underwater transport submarines, interesting concept an upgrade on the Japanese I-400 meant to carry attack planes. Maybe not so far fetch in the real world but scaled down for drones maybe?.
Now be honest @foundandexplained, did you find these plans in Soviet archives? Or in the "unused assets" folder from Red Alert 3?
That you continue to use the T34 model for the submarine in the 50s really bites me. But good on you then using the amphibious tanks in the last sub
This looks like some of Red Alert 2 unit. Would it blast hell match from massive speakers
Would have never worked! During the cold war no Russian subs ever left port without a US escort! We tracked them with our P-3's, S-3's and Attack subs...they were never alone!
Whatsup with the dubbing on 12.05?? Lmao
large sub, worthless as most ideal landing beaches have long shallow shores making it most likely for the large sub to beach itself easily. small sub, tanks do not easily/quickly move sideways from a tight confined space and likely the ice could not even support the tank where the sub has to break through thin layers only.
Boy! There are a lot of people crapping all over this thing, saying sawed-off shotguns are a better solution. Nonsense!
I think a variant of this baby would be awesome to have on hand.
I can see a variant made with six barrels that fired two at a time!
Maybe have one designed that fired a 20mm cannon round with a proximity fuse in it! (expensive!)
actual content start at 3:40
Man, it would have been awesome if they'd built some of those!
The fact that they built the Ekranoplans proves that everything was on the table for these nut jobs!
Each submarine has troops tanks and a nuke 😊
That’ll be difficult considering they don’t have wheels.
It’s crazy how much effort we do to kill each other
Imagine if there were no rule to space
We would have nuclear ships or something
As soon as a russsian sub starts moving, US acoustical sensors detect it. The US knows where every russian sub is so this is a vodka dream.
I’m no military strategist, but even I know that an expeditionary military operation isn’t hard because it’s hard to get the tip of the spear there; it’s hard because you need to keep them supplied. So you get a half of a BTG to North America. Fine. All they have with them is enough supplies for at best 3 days of fighting. Probably much less. There’s no version of this where it would be anything more than a harassing tactic, and it would be understood to be a one way ticket to America for everyone.
Its the sub from Toy Soldiers lol
6:45
At 348 tons???
But your graphics states as 3,480 tons!!!
It still wouldnt be enough n they know that. Plus it would cost way too much money just to build aside from the costs if destroyed and time it would take to build them