ไม่สามารถเล่นวิดีโอนี้
ขออภัยในความไม่สะดวก
M1A1 Abrams VS T-90M | Armour Piercing Simulation
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 23 ก.พ. 2024
- This simulation shows the impact of the 120mm M829A3 APFSDS-T with a Depleted Uranium penetrator being fired from a US M1A1 Abrams tank at a range of 0.8km, targeting the front hull of a Russian T-90M tank.
In 2017-2021, the Russian government signed a contract for the production of 270 tanks Т-90М. The supply of Т-90М in 2021 was 80 units, in 2022 - about 60, making up 140 in total. The T-90M, while upgraded from the third-generation T-90, is not quite a fourth-generation tank. Rather, the T-90M is a “modernized” third-generation tank.
While the T-90 relied upon Kontakt-5 armor, the M-variant is encased within Relikt built-in Explosive Reactive Armor. The T-90M has other enhanced safety features, too, including rubber side skirts, cage armor, special netting, and spall lining. To further protect the crew, the T-90M uses an NBC system, which uses tank interior sealing and overpressure generation to protect against mass destruction weapons.
The Russian army has reportedly lost over 20 T-90M tanks during the ongoing operations in Ukraine.
some mf said ERA is useless against apfsds bruh
Every simulation shows the dart hitting the era block dead center where its most effective
No one shows how effective it is if the dart hits a corner or anything
Contact 1 (5mm against pen) useless, but Contact 5 (120mm against Apfsds) and Relict (250mm) , there is also a Duplet (250-300mm).
@@BlackZaporozhianDUPLET is twice as heavy tho id you want to use it on a tank you have to remove the first layer of composite to fit it due to weight increase but yeah it is more effective than RELIKT and K5
Once upon a time, that was true.
@@ozan1234561 ERA works as is should be when hit. When not hit it doenst work. Is that really a big surprise?
Bro thinks he's an helicopter
on gng bro lil bro funna fly
its very good that while animation is running , a commentary speak about what's going on in this video and history about it! good job
Bros turrent engine stuck 💀
Love how the projectile flies upwards to avoid the truck, then goes straight back to it’s original flight path.
Why is the relikt exploding so quickly?
If it exploded slowly it would be more effective. This is the fastest i have seen on any simulation.
I never seen a "SLOW" explosion
@@nickbanz9283relict typically has a slight delay so it can use both flyer plates to create a sheer effect on whatever is hitting it
Timestep is different.
@@nickbanz9283 the explosive velocity of smokeless gunpowder nowadays 7km per second compared to 1300m/s of blackpowder.
There are definitely slower explosions.
Or maybe the explosive was triggered too quickly in relikt.
О, это вы великий конструктор бронетанковой техники? напишите в Уралвагонзавод со своей заявкой, по слухам "секретная информация от наших коллег из ФБР" там работают одни кретины которые совсем не справляются со своей работой и им никак не обойтись без ваших величайших конструкторских решений
P.S. дубина ты сталеросовая физику прогуливала видимо в школе, ты вообще имеешь понятие, как ведёт себя материал на таких скоростях? Задача реликта как раз и состоит в том чтобы с максимальной скоростью выбросить бронеплиту в сторону снаряда чтобы за вот это микромгновение контакта с ним передать ему противоположный импульс, замедлив его а также изменив вектор скорости БОПСа, хотя да в вашей танковой доктрине до сих пор существует мнение что без заряжающего из банановой республики не обойтись и чем тяжелее танк, тем лучше, скоро видимо дойдете до того что у вас борта и крыша танка из фанеры крашеной будут (вы уже к этому близки), чтобы хоть как-то компенсировать толщину лба корпуса и башни которая себя оправдывает только в случае если бы в танк стреляли только прямо))))))))))
The relict is exploding way too soon and far too fast. The back plate does not even contact the rod
Спасибо, теперь все военные заводы поднялись и стали менять "Реликт"...
Только Малахит (ДЗ 4 поколения) будет максимально эффективно понижать угрозу от ОБПС.
@@KasKusOKне будет, против него уже созданы М829А4 и DM73.
@@romanyalovyi6079 Ты один из тех идиотов, которые считают, что в Rheinmetall работают волшебники создавшие ОБПС, летящий с гигантской скоростью и не влияющий на объекты попадающиеся на его пути?
Ты хоть немного читал о ДЗ "Малахит"? Знаешь, что она снимает примерно 800 мм бронепробития? Ты знаешь, как она работает? Нет - не пиши чушь...
@@romanyalovyi6079малахит работает не от прямого воздействия, а с помощью электрического поля, дз сработает всё равно, да и не надо нести бред, что дз от новых ломов не сработает
@@romanyalovyi6079оба снаряда даже в серию ещё не пошли😅
incorrect Relikt working!
Reilly is the best ERA by any European country
Prove it
@@Justbecausewhy_notТаковым, стоит называть ДЗ "Малахит". Он буквально ломает лучший, на данный момент, M829A4, сводя его пробитие к 50-80мм.
I would like to suggest a simulation of 50mm ap round vs m1a2 abrams side skirt (around 30mm ar550 steel) + side hull (around 80mm ar550 steel), as the armour and thickness are classified, this is a closer thickness specification and steel hardness.
This is brilliant animation work, are you using Blender or Unreal, both?
Hello !
How did you manage to make those text arrows at 0:17?
Wait why does the DU rod bend with the steel tip? While the tip itself never break off?
Because the front still got slapped by the plate. Not that hard to see
@@commitselfdeletus9070 ok? In the video the steel part got the same properties of the DU rod, which is not true lmao
@@somerandomboibackup6086 du is inferior to tungsten btw, it fractures and cracks on impact, its only used because the west lacks tungsten and can't make better penetrators. Also the west is stuck in the 90s. Another side is du is a way for us to get rid of its nuclear waste to other countries. Also it cost nothing to make really. Ask the crews who are dying of cancer how good DU is in shells and armour 😂😂😂 or the other shit like asbestos.
I think they're working with public knowledge.
because this simulation doesn't mean damned thing and we've already tested the UFP of a T90A with ERA and it doesnt work lol
Why are T-90M steel plates segmented? That may have altered the results in some way.
On the other hand, perhaps try delaying the detonation of ERA a little bit more? This feels very "sudden", the back flying plate had almost no interaction with the projectile.
The plates are segmented to reduce the number of nodes and control the size of the segment. This process has no effect after using fixed support and other techniques. Actually the second plate interacts with the penetrator, the detonation time was set to simulate the real Relikt mechanism.
@@SimulationPluswhy penetrator has just one segment ? If even DM53 has 3.
@@romanyalovyi6079 actually DM53 penetrator is not segmented. M829A3 as we know from the patents has 1 segmented sacrificial section which is the tip of the projectile made of steel.
@@alanch90 DM53 has 3 segments.
German patent DE 4023482A1
Zu einer Anhebung der Durchschlagsleistung von unterka-librigen Wuchtgeschossen 10 an Mehrstoff-Sonderzielen werden vor ainem Hauptkern 20 zwei Vorkerne 21,22 kleinerer Masse angeordnet und wird eine die Vorkerne 21, 22 und einen Teilbereich des Hauptkerns 20 umschliebende ballistische Haube 11 mit einer Spitze 12 aus Wolfram-Schwermetall versehen. Die Spitze 12 wird in die ballistische Haybe 11 einge-schraubt. Der erste Vorkern 21, der sich vorderseitig konisch verjungt, wird mittels einer Madenschraube 14 axial fixiert. Die Fixierung des zweiten zylindrischen Vorkerns 22 erfolgt beispielsweise uber einem am Hauptkern 20 vorgesehenen Gewindezapfen 26. Ziwischen den einzelnen Kernen 20,21,22 konnen Zwischenlagen 15,16 aus einem weicheren Material zur Stobdampfung vorgesehen sein.
M829A3 is the same.
@@alanch90 DM53 has 3 segments.
German patent DE 4023482A1.
M829A3 is the same, but longer.
Is that impactus afea?
SHA? What is that on the front plate?
I ask the same, i thought it was rolled homogeneous armor, but it's called RHA.
M829A3 muzzle velocity is 1555 M/S
What program do you use?
I think the ERA should have done a bit more damage to the penetrator, it seems to me like the ERA plates are moving slightly too fast in comparison to the penetrator, at least based on other ERA simulations ive seen although i could be wrong.
Почему реликт сработал, когда снаряд даже не пробил его внешнюю плиту?
Он сработал корректно...
@@KasKusOK Ага🤣🤣🤣
The brits developed chobham for the Abrams but kept an even better version of it for themselves only, id love to know how that grade does
You are not applying proper boundary conditions. Parts of tank armor are moving freely as if you were firing at a cutout IRL. The tank would shake itself apart if you built it like this.
What is the deal with the upwards strike angle?
M1a1 is from the 80s… t90m enters service like 5 years ago
M829A3 APFSDS-T Depleted Uranium is made in 2014. It's not about the tank, it's the ammo
@@bigsmoke4345 Абрамс от Модифкации М1А1 до M1A1SA не способны стрелять снарядами M829A3, это могут только модификации M1A2, M1A2C sep 1, sep 2, sep 3 , sep 4, но они используют более новый снаряд M829A4
@@SFERA9-rb6xw the guy who made the video says this "This simulation shows the impact of the 120mm M829A3 APFSDS-T with a Depleted Uranium penetrator being fired from a US M1A1 Abrams tank at a range of 0.8km, targeting the front hull of a Russian T-90M tank."
So, this means M829A4's could easily go through the T90 UFP
I don't know did the ERA do well or not
The APFSDS didn't penetrate the T-90M
it seems to have prevented proper penetration by destabilizing the projectile, so I'd say yes.
it didn't. The relikt exploded way too quickly, only damaging the head of the shell, not the body.
@@chickenchicken8097did you not just watch it? Not only did it damage the head, the tip didn’t break away it warped the projectile in the front, which is the whole point of the breakaway tip.. to defeat deformation of the rod before it makes contact. This video while a good simulation of what it used, is missing key segments that would affect the outcome in big ways. Some people said the era exploded too fast, the tip didn’t break way and deformed the rod. These make big differences in the outcome.
T90M3 also has APS
So which type of ammo can destroy T-90M from front?
Well, a lot depend on angle of impact and distance.
M829A4
try the A4
probably why the A4 exists.
damn relikt is real upgrade after k5
Someone made a good point, why did the tip not break off and immediately warped what would have been an intact rod, which is the point of the breakaway tip, no?
Потому, что на таких скоростях металл поведением становится похожим на жидкость.
Cuz this is Propaganda my man!😂
@@scottsauritch3216no it’s that at high speeds metal acts like liquid
nice
but the helicopter tho....
Would the M829A4 pen it? It seem like this was a close one.
Yep, it was made to defeat relict
well that's the core design of it so yeah 90% likely
@@quan-uo5wsM829A3 was made to defeat Relikt.
@@romanyalovyi6079No, it was made to defeat Kontakt-5, which is what the US army *had to test* after acquiring T-72A1 and T-72B1 tanks from the Germans in the 1990s.
How could they design it to defeat Relikt if it replaced M829A2 in 2003, a full 3 years before Relikt was deployed in 2006?
Stop lying in all your comments.
@@toma3025 lying means purposely spreading misinformation, he is in fact just blindly believes into what he said which means he is just stipid
Too close. I think weaker base armor of T-80BVM would have been penetrated. T-90M just has better base armor.
Oh MIM-104 PAC-2 Patriot Missile Penetrated 200 Kilometers on A-50 AWACS aircraft.
Nope it was friendly fire. lol
It was friendly fire , and Ukrainian messiles can't reach that range lol
It was a s200
@@Giganibba511 No, these are 2 S-200s. The video of the Russian missile launch is the shooting down of the first S-200 (it exploded a little earlier). We didn’t have time to shoot down the second one.
@@bittemeinrammstein"friendly"
T90M: spin me around
There's no way the turrent turn so fast
The turret didnt even turn that fast,wdym
That’s slow for an mbt
Bro, got an update for you. An abrams in Ukraine just got bonked by T-72B3 :D
plz make video about turret armor merkava 4m
The Merkava doesn’t have much armor, it’s an infantry fighting vehicle. They have a lot of thin metal to protect against simple grenade launchers, and that's it. Any tank will shoot Merkava.
@@MultiNike79this is a joke… right?
@@M4_Sherman587 No. The Merkava is designed to fight the poorly armed semi-civilian indigenous population of Palestine. Accordingly: huge dimensions and internal volume for landing, which is impossible for tanks. Thin spaced armor can combat the cumulative blast from simple grenades, but is useless against modern anti-tank missiles or APFSDS. Slow and heavy is normal for Israeli soil, but in Ukraine or Europe it would be an easy way for soldiers to pay off their mortgage.
@@MultiNike79 i dont think you know what an IFV is… the merkava by definition is quite literally an MBT. Also, i have no idea where you got your info about it being underarmored, some parts of the turret has almost 1000mm of protection against kinetic rounds. plus, it has the trophy APS system to protect it from missiles. it was literally the main reason the merkava was built, to have a tank that will absolutely protect the scarce number of qualified crew israel has. do not talk about something you have 0 idea about.
@@M4_Sherman587 _i dont think you know what an IFV is_
What other tank do you know that can transport troops internally? And the design of the tank was copied from a captured Soviet IFV, with its engine at the front and the driver at the side.
_some parts_
The Merkava is a huge tank that cannot be properly armored. This is more even compared to Western pseudo-tanks like Abrams or Leopard. Simply, according to physics, the Merkava will be inferior to normal tanks in terms of armor.
_the trophy APS system_
Please note that in real footage of the Merkava’s defeat, Trophy did not work. There is a reason why no one uses the APS system on the battlefield, rather than in punitive raids against civilians. The same Arena-M was developed a long time ago, but in real conditions these systems have too many problems.
_a tank that will absolutely protect_
Please note that the results of the war in Grozny and similar scale operations in Lebanon - Merkava and T-series showed similar results in terms of tank losses and crew losses.
Tanks of Russian crews are easier to protect in much MORE COMPLEX conditions than Merkavas, which can only shoot the weak with full cover.
_have 0 ideas about._
Yeah, yeah.
You are very good at discrediting yourself with such a simulation.
Demian XYZ Simulations did a proper simulation a month ago
What happened at your face?
Вертолёт быстрее лома?
Ты о чем?
Please add disclaimers to your videos. Alot of people actually think this is a realistic one-to-one simulation. Which its not, so its pretty misleading.
All russia MBTs with Relict have 5-layer hull armor. Like metal->textolite glass->metal->textolite glass->metal.
0:24 поставил дизлайк за то что автор смеется над Т-90М
Гений мысли, посчитать забавное вращение башни в анимации за насмешку над ОБТ Т90М
@@Wuwesare это прямая насмешка от автора на вращение башни танка, которая произошло с танком когда бредли повредил систему о предупреждении об обучении
@@firdavsking тогда пожалуй ты может быть и прав, но я не уверен можно ли это назвать проявлением неуважения к российским ОБТ
@@Wuwesare самый адекватный пользователь ютуб 🙂
поплачь обиженка
The sneaky reference to the spinning turret in Ukraine
This is why America developed m829a4 it essentially ignores relikt m829a3 is designed to defeat kontakt 5
m829a2 was designed to beat K-5
A turret hit would be more likely...
It is unlikely that the Abrams will meet the T 90 in battle. I think it will be like with leopards and British tanks. they will become easy prey for ATGMs and lancets. Telegram has a recent video of the destruction of a repair vehicle based on an Abrams tank
Abrams himself has already been destroyed, for which I congratulate you.
@@MultiNike79 I already know. there are photos and videos. As far as I understand, it was destroyed by a commercial quadcopter. I’ll also note that at the same time the archer self-propelled gun (a very rare vehicle) was destroyed. There is also a video (I don’t know how recent it is) where a PzH 2000 was destroyed by counter-battery fire
I mean... The T-72 got its revenge by attacking the M1A1 Abrams using a T-72B3.
why penetrator has just one segment ? If even DM53 has 3.
This is not relikt.
0:24 what happen with the tank :))
t90 vs bradley
А где поподание в абрамс??
в твоем военкомате
By far the best armor sim channel, yet you aren’t the most famous :(
T-90M: helicopter helicopter
What?
In the other video you did you put up an m1 abrams from the cold war☠️ against a t90 and shot the weakest part of it from close range.
In this video you shot a t90m from long range and at one of its strongest parts☠️
The Russian bias is strong with this one.
Very good simulation. I was doubtful that even with A3 shot it would go through UFP. Soviet UFPs are a different breed
Why are we using the m1a1 and not the m1a2 v2 or v3?
The fascists are afraid that the Nazis will lose them and Russia will become targets for research.
Russian drones, helicopters and artillery, as well as FABs, will not feel the difference. So why should Americans spend more new equipment?!
because the use the same gun? like the only change the did is addon armor and CROW system, they haven't change a lot of thing to the hun other than it able to use programable round
The M-829A3 tip isn't steel, its tungsten.
It is steel, It isn't like dm53 that is tungsten.
What is your source?
@@SimulationPlus
The ATK patent for Steel tip comes well after the round was in full production and refers to an export round concept made of tungsten.
The patent for the M829A3 penetrator # US6662726B1 was submitted in mid 1999, and the DOI for the M289A3 was 2003. (you can google it)
"first portion of the body having a first mass of about at least 9% to 15% of a penetrator mass and consisting primarily of a single piece of a tungsten-based material"
"The former is chosen to produce a relatively wide hole in the face plate of explosive reactive armor while the latter is chosen to best perforate basal armor. The connection between the two portions is configured to rupture under pre-determined conditions, namely at a threshold torque between the first and second sections. Such rupture reduces the tendency of interaction forces between the armor and the first portion from deflecting the second portion into an ineffective, highly oblique relation to the basal armor."
There is no mention of a steel tip.
The alloy of the M829A3 is also far better than the M829A1 at around 5% better performance against RHA at 0-deg, and far more resilient to deformation.
A3 was designed to counter ERA,which is why it has a steel tip
@@abas656thegodemperor9 I posted the US patent US6662726B1 which is for the M829A3 penetrator. Not sure why my comment was deleted. However, if you google it you can see that they designed it in 1999 with a tungsten penetrator to defeat ERA.
This is not hard. Google it and read it.
Я думал пройдет. Так то лобовая броня т-90 средняя, но круговая хорошая.
Абрамс наоборот, спереди твердый, но по кругу мягонький.
Aren't all tanks are hard in front and soft all around? There are no tanks that can survive side shots, top attack or rear
@@ashtray2294 советую посмотреть видео, как т-90 переживает удар джавелина в крышу изнутри танка.
Концепция танков типа т-90 это более прочная защита по кругу, но слабее спереди.
У танков НАТО по сути вся броня спереди.
Разные концепции и подходы к использованию машин. Но в войне дронов лучше иметь лучшую круговую защиту.
ok the spinning t90 turret was so RELATABLE😂😂
Как там абрамс у Авдеевки?)
lancet loves abrams sooooo much))
So if this is the case why didnt they do simulations and than just do a good ol slapparoo of another 50mm of steel and be sure there will be no pen?
They actually did back in the 80s when soviet designers realised that 105mm apfsds could barely penetrate t-72 ufp, so they added a 16mm armored plate and that stopped the round
Trash engine, ERA is lighter but more effective
@@somerandomboibackup6086 its just smoll.
But itsnt about engine, 1HP per tonn loss is not catastrophic loss. Problem is in transmission, its pretty much at its limmit
so leo 2a7v can pen it easily
Technically, in a 1v1 battle, the T-90 will shoot Leo from a safe distance outside the danger zone.
Spiiiiuiuiuiiinnnn
Blah blah blah, no pen. Gee, who could've guessed.
Even in War Thunder if you shot at the front side of the T-90M you wont's kill the driver.#warthundet90m
Even T-72 sent Abrams flying in orbit in the first shot recently in Ukraine 😂😂😂
The US and German most powerful rounds are only capable of defeating Kontakt5. Now that Relikt may be available to them for testing, we might see something develop in the future thats more capable
The new Abrams was hit by a Russian tank.
У автора неприязнь к т-90
А у физики? :)
@@MultiNike79
Physics are rusophobic
@@MultiNike79when ERA plates fly faster than an APFSDS projectile traveling at 1600 meters per second. “Physics” you say? 🤡
Потому что Т 90 превосходит Абрамс, хотя бы потому, что у него нет заряжающего факинг нигга 😅
@@Anonymous-is6xu The detonation speed is 10 times faster than the combustion of powder gases. Nothing surprising here. The difference is that the projectile will arrive in one piece, and the plate will turn into fragments.
lost only 20? something like 60 already
More than 20, less than 60. By comparison around 65 leopards were already destroyed.
@@igormsh14bidevisualizacoes45 65? Yeah, 14 destroyed other damaged, total 35
@@nehalemxtv5331 Oryx stopped counting most ukrainian losses. Look at any tg and count yourself, you will see what i mean.
@@igormsh14bidevisualizacoes45just last week i saw around 5 burnt out leopards in telegram lmao
Ссылаться на ориксы и прочую поеботу - себя не уважать. За все время подтверждено уничтожение 3(!) т-90м! 3(!!!). Было около 5 поврежденных, которые потом в тыл эвакуировали. Свои сказки рассказывай дома на кухне у себя
Your simulation would be a lot more accurate if you used cardboard.
Увидел как горит абрамс, яркое зрелище
Сколько горящих Т-72 и Т-90 вы видели? Слишком много сейчас вспоминать, даже горящие МТ-ЛБ сейчас обычное явление...
@@Gundan223 даже горящие пуканы украинцев сейчас - обычное зрелище. Потому что их в интернете гораздо больше, чем абрамсов в зоне боевых действий
@@Gundan223Кто бы мог подумать что танк независимо от чьей нации будет гореть как спичка, вот это да!
@@Gundan223 because both sides using soviet equipment in mass number?
t-90 was about to take off💀
Ураааааа уураа
Makes sense, M829A3 being insufficient against Relikt is why M829A4 is a thing.
I like comparing these computer simulations to reality. If the Russian 3BM44M 125mm APFSDS rounds can punch through the frontal armor of the T90M as we've seen in Ukraine, I don't think the M829A3 would have a problem cutting into it.
Так стоп, а где ты это видел?
СЕГОДНЯ,, СОЖГЛИ ВТОРОЙ АБРАМС!!!!! СЛАВА РУССКОЙ АЛЬТИЛЕРИИ!!! 👍✌️✌️✌️
А теперь посчитай сколько сожгли ваших танков
@@Artig627 да уже весь мир, увидел, как наши держат по несколько6паподаний... А амеро дерьмо, казалось, обычной рекламой продаж.. Ваших меньше? Согласен, потому, что на этом рекламном дерьме, плохо воевать... Где ваши "Челенджеры".. Два, сожгли, на остальных, вундервафля, носа не суют. А Лепоперд, оказался, обычным куском железа!.. Российская техника-для войны, натовская, лишь для рекламы, игр,, и гонять аборигенов по Ближнему Востоку...
Уничтожили 2 Абрамса но потеряли 5000 танков
@@dibilkaplay_yt Исконно РУССКАЯ логика👍
@@Artig627 🥶🥶🥶
If a desert storm bradley can demolish a T90M then a abrams is equivalent to dropping a 12000 lbs bomb directly onto a t90m.
God you are so naive. if you knew Russian, you would have watched the interview with the Bradley gunner who fired at the T90. According to him, he didn’t really see the tank; its shooting was corrected by a drone. and he was very scared that he could not penetrate the armor of the tank
@@jah886 Thank you for the information. and since I'm so naive because I don't know a certain language means you are also so naive since you can't speak or listen to more than 7000+ languages. and also demolishing/destroying and disabling are all practically the same thing in warfare, it gets taken out of action.
you took what he said from your @ss lmao, there is ones with subtitles and everybody knows it doesn't matter how strong a tank, if you ambush it in the right place, it will be destroyed.@@Vrooto
A drone took the tank out.
The Bradley damaged various components but failed to penetrate the armor at all. Russian tank armour has held up quite well to the rare instances of tank, missile and cannon fire hitting its frontal arc. Vehicle on vehicle engagements are exceedingly rare in modern warfare now and most tanks destroyed in this war have been annihilated by indirect fire and hits on their flanks. Desert Storm was literally 30 years ago and a completely outdated metric to use to analyze 21st century drone dominated warfare.
@@neferpoyaz4037 so you have nothing better to do than extend an argument?
Like always, nobody knows what Relikt was designed in 1993 after fail K-5 by Palastrov work.
Хватит снимать фейковые стимуляции, ничего не имеющие с реальностью
Go go power Russian!!!! Neee nee na neeee neee nee ne
He won't get to the T-90 anyway, at least 1 won't get there for sure)
Odd reports from Ukraine shows That T-90M frontal armour cannot stop older APDS from leo 2A4, About looses 80 T-90M confirmed visually, 8 T-90S, 1 T-90AK, 38 T-90A, Total confirmed tank losses 2936
This is all complete bs from your first claim alone because their has been only one single engagement between any russian federation tank and a nato tank and it was a leopard2A6 firing HE at the front chassie of the T-80BVM. Both tanks backed off
Леопарды вообще никогда не стреляли по русским танкам,они лишь выполняли роль САУ а когда выезжали на поле то из тут же достигали дроны
Да и по потерям стоит уточнить что у украины только больше/меньше 100 танков леопард из которых 40 уже унечтоженно а другие либо на складах либо за фронтом
А т-90м около 500 штук это на 2022 год час кнч уже больше
Поздравляю всех с первым сожжёным абрамсом нацистов.
Счет 1:2000?🤣
уже третий пошел
Oh yeah, here you are
Уже 5
Nonsense. If reactive armor is effective, why isn't it used by most NATO countries? Moreover, many films from Ukraine question the effectiveness of reactive armor even when attacked by a shitty drone.
The rotating turret from T90 is nice detail 😂 ... Bradley 25 mm Bushmaster Like this ❤
yes , its pretty much PENETRATED the turret already with only a 25mm APFSDS
a Abrams 120mm APFSDS is gonna penetrate even more.
I bet this video gonna be deleted once Ukraine tests the Abrams with a captured damaged T-90M for testing.
@@stinopharan5528No the Bradley didn't penetrate T-90M, the gunner panicked and was rotating the turret because external sights were destroyed
@@stinopharan5528 nope, it didn't get pennetrated, you probably don't know how armor works
@@stinopharan5528 They only gave them apds and ap they don't have apdsfs
@@stinopharan5528
retarded angloid logic:
penetration of 20 tonne turret = perpetually spinning turret
😂😂😂😂 It was a cheap drone. It was just a drone that turned your tank into a burning pile of junk... Therefore, the rest of the Russian weapons will be at another level that Western weapons cannot confront, so I think that Russia will be satisfied with drones.
did you get that confident after seeing a tank cannot pen the upper plate? The most armored place of a tank and also id not get that cocky since those drones will not help much higher in the skied with planes or in the sea with ships against the west
Same like Abram, it only takes a cheap drone or cheap RPG to destroy it
@@tietieno4890simulation never shows the truth. It is not known
@@fotunfotun7515 This simulation id very close to the real thing. Yes it can be a bit unrealistic but i once saw a video where they replicated a scenario and the armor turned exactly out as the real thing
Это кстати на видео старый снаряд M829A3 с пробиваемостью 900м на расстоянии 2 км, в США давно используется снаряд M829A4 который пробивает до 1250мм брони на расстоянии 2 км;)😁
для сравнения самый мощный БОПС снаряд у Т-90АМ/МС это 3БМ60 который пробивает 700мм брони на расстоянии 2км и этот снаряд даже не был принят на вооружение, и место него Т-90АМ/МС использует 3БМ42 у которого пробитие жалкие 500мм на расстоянии 2 км;)😁
This is Bull !!!
The Abrams ammo will go right through it !!
You give Russian armor WAY to much value, It's doesn't work or are you not watching the thousands of Russian Tanks getting totally Destroyed on YT videos !! ? 🤔
Sgt, Semper Fi
Listen you are not a military expert neither am I but what I do know is that the way most T 90s get destroyed in ukraine is by drone attack or by Javelin anti tank guided missiles and not by armour piercing discarding sabot ammunition. If the Russians had there own Javelin then the Abrams would be no match for that. Do you really think the nation which destroyed WW2 Germany (the most technologically advanced army of the world at that time) would forget to develop modern tanks. The soviet union whoes technology America would be willing to lick anyone's boot for will forget what they have learned and gained over the decades.
@@jaggerfoxland8103l Really, 12 yrs in the Marines and 4 Combat deployments and all my experiences with that gives me all the "expertise" and all the countless people I know in the military including Tankers that I need !! Semper Fi
@@ronniefarnsworth6465my dude 12 years of experience don't really mean much in a conventional war. Somerhing the u.s has fought since the gulf war and even then it was just steamrolling a backwater dictatorship with no moral and outdated equpiment. Penetration vaules for Relik are not the same as Kontact 5. Also your not a tanker, not did you have a combat MOS with anything involving Anti armor equpiment or else you should know by now the purpose of ERA and how it works instead of spouting bs you found on twitter. Also their is only 20 confirmed reports kf T-90M's being knocked out wirh a few of them up for debate if they are even real. Its people like you giving the marines a bad name
if you believe similar videos taken from the author’s fantasies, you might think that Russian tanks are armored with bricks without a layer of cement)
this is not accurate. M829A3 goes right through T90M/Relict pretty easily. the T90M LOS thickness is almost exactly 700mm with Relict
but the M829A3 has a Penetration of about 780-800mm
Its pretty close, but the A3 ammo will still defeat T90Ms consistently
Giving the equivalent of RHA steel is not accurate, rather a rough estimate. M829A3 was designed to defeat Russian MBTs with Kontakt-5. Modernized Russian MBTs with Relikt would be able to defeat M829A3
sauce?
No, the base thickness is 600mm. +50% RHA protection would give an LOS protection of 900mm, which is more than enough to defeat A3 at a range of 2km which is indeed 780mm.
@@yuripotecknov5164M829A3 was made to defeat Relikt.
@@Anonymous-is6xu where TF are you getting a magical +50% RHA protection from?
also (60+10+50+60) 180mm of armor at 68 deg is only 480mm sorry to tell you that. the Relict will add roughly 220mm more effective armor when applied to this matrix. bringing it upto about 700mm exactly. you literally have the answer right in front of you, stop reading russian bias crap sources that claims russian armor is 5x stronger than the laws of raw physics and reality dictates its actually is.
Things dont magically work the way you want them in your head, while ignoring reality.
Only God Forgives
Abrams 👎👎👎👎👎👎
this is a m1a1 not a m1a2 it’s old
Bradley 25mm APFSDS PENETRATED the T-90M turret already.
An Abrams 120mm APFSDS will Penetrate even more.
I hope you don't delete this video once its got disproven by Ukraine.
They had several captured T-90M for testing penetrations.
No the Bradley didn't, the T-90M gunner was rotating the turret because sights were destroyed and he panicked
Well, that's a problem if you think 25mm can penetrate a MBT armour.
I like to see how these idiots think that the only T-90M was penetrated and destroyed by the Bradley))) In reality, the T-90M evacuated its entire crew, and the crew of the Bradley later stated in an interview that they fired high-explosive shells at the tank (hence there is so much fire and sparks in the video, and not from equal armor-piercing shells), because they did not have armor-piercing shells))) The tank had previously been damaged by a FPV drone. You, Western people, have no right to talk about this war at all, you have zero awareness of what is happening, and what information you have is from stupid pro-Ukrainian propaganda.
the gunner rotating the turret on panick cuz the optics are destroyed, not because it got pennetrated, if it got pennetrated then the tank gonna sit like the Bradley convoys in Zaporizhia
Please never vote