Ukrainian M1A1 Abrams SA with Kontakt-1 Reactive Armor on the Eastern Frontline. Modern Tank Warfare

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 22 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 884

  • @houstonsmitherman6888
    @houstonsmitherman6888 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +71

    As an American. Seeing our abrams with Eastern ERA isn't something I thought I wanted to see more of but here we are

  • @cho4d
    @cho4d 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +384

    thumbs up for the subtle eagle screech at the begining

    • @gefagnis
      @gefagnis 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

      thats not an eagle thats a red tailed hawk

    • @louisschummer931
      @louisschummer931 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@gefagnis Yup, eagles don't screach except when Hollywood throws in the voice of a hawk.

    • @christianmartires729
      @christianmartires729 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Thats a hawk, not an Eagle.
      Since the Abrams was built in collaboration with the Germans, you could say the sound as made by a "REICH EAGLE" or the hawk o/

  • @borisstanislav4560
    @borisstanislav4560 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +557

    Some of these mighty machines will be destroyed and some even captured but in the end, the battlefield is where they belong, saving soldiers lives and sending invaders to the other side.

    • @todorpamukov7435
      @todorpamukov7435 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Idk how had ppl still believe ukrainians even western aid can defeat Russia.Even NATO cant defeat russians in a convetional war in Ukraine.I not mentoined nuclear weapons because if both sides start use it and God cant help us then

    • @lorenzcassidy3960
      @lorenzcassidy3960 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@todorpamukov7435 Ukraine managed to stop ruzzia for more than two years with dripfed, second hand western weaponry and NO airpower AT ALL.
      Rest easy that NATO would wipe the "mighty" ruzzian rabble off of Ukraine's borders with its airpower ALONE.

    • @FloorBed
      @FloorBed 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +26

      Hard to argue with the US’s reluctance to send the newest model, as it could be bad for everyone if Russia could capture and reverse engineer the classified armor. I guess Russia would have to first value its soldiers enough to add fancy armor though…

    • @TheWizardboy5
      @TheWizardboy5 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +26

      @@FloorBed They'd also have to source the materials to construct that high tech armor. good luck under sanction from a majority of the world

    • @SlavaUkraini85
      @SlavaUkraini85 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      on point!

  • @Song26664
    @Song26664 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +34

    Abrams with ERA looks awesome.

  • @jmj48
    @jmj48 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +118

    Awesome tank crew. Good to see those tanks in action.

    • @GalAxy-u9s
      @GalAxy-u9s 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Are they on action?

    • @AndrewC137
      @AndrewC137 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Why don’t you send you son to be apart of the crew since you are so happy about seeing it in “action”

    • @jmj48
      @jmj48 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@GalAxy-u9s you russian troll ?

    • @jmj48
      @jmj48 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      @@AndrewC137 you russian trolling again ?

    • @Youtuber-k2p
      @Youtuber-k2p 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Did you miss the part where it is getting a new engine because they sent Abrams that are 40 years old and the slow maintenance times, quote “are killing our people”, they have to wait for parts from the US and the engines’ age is ruining all the engine seals? They even came without ERAs so they attached their own.

  • @fyuriusryage5353
    @fyuriusryage5353 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +116

    Unfortunately, the RuZZians figured out a weakness, which is why the added armor was needed. The blast doors on the ammo storage (top of the turret) helps save the crew in a "normal" combat environment, but in Ukraine, drones are EVERYWHERE. And they figured out if you hit the blast doors with an FPV, you can easily disable the tank by setting off the ammo. The crew lives, but the tank is useless. This is how RuZZia got some "trophies" that they displayed in moscow. The added armor around the turret, and the improvised "cages" help protect it from FPV. Hard lessons learned by Ukraine, grateful to them all.

    • @PrayedForYou
      @PrayedForYou 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      Funny how at the etart of the war everyone was laughing at "cope cages"
      Turns ouf the "Ruzzians" had a good idea

    • @shrais
      @shrais 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +52

      @@PrayedForYou Funny that FPV drones weren't in wide use at the very start and the cages were meant to protect from Javelin and NLAW and were completely useless for that.

    • @mclukas44lol25
      @mclukas44lol25 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      “ruZZians”, Ukroid, you provoked this conflict. Also its that they neglect the equipment by using rubber tracks in mud. Their own fault. Plus the Abrams is too heavy and armour can save it from a lancet.

    • @Perfectly_Cromulent351
      @Perfectly_Cromulent351 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@mclukas44lol25you’re a terrible human being.

    • @ineedcash09
      @ineedcash09 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      @@mclukas44lol25 Dusk, vata.

  • @Mahbu
    @Mahbu 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +53

    It's fascinating to see how these old bois do on the field of battle. They are not the newest nor most modern versions and they lack all the fancy toys that make the American Abrams what they are. They were also designed with American doctrine and American logistics - arguably the best in the world - in mind. These Abrams are therefor fishes out of water in the hybrid Soviet/Ukrainian/Western doctrine Ukraine is forced to play with.
    They will do their job, though. More importantly, they were a message that the West is prepared to supply more (and more) types of equipment.

    • @weronikazalewska2098
      @weronikazalewska2098 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      They were originally developed in the 70s and 80s with the intention to face soviet mass mobilisation in eastern European plains, so they suit it fine. No main battletank is doctrinally and tactically perfect for use during elastic defence situations such as that taking place now though, except for limited counter attacks.

    • @USN1985dos
      @USN1985dos 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      lol, what? These were in service with the US Marine Corps just a few years ago.

    • @JustSlightly
      @JustSlightly 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@USN1985dosthey may have seen service but that’s because they are still useable. No reason to scrap equipment like this that still functions to this day.

    • @KozenX
      @KozenX 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@USN1985dosyou mean M1A1 FEP or AIDATS? Those are different from the M1A1SA, there’s significant component differences and idk if you checked the context in this video, the USMC Abrams had new parts and actually had logistical backing like having said parts and maintenance on the ready at all times. I’d wager before the MC retired them that they at least had the night to day treatment compared to what the UAF has going now.

    • @Mahbu
      @Mahbu 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@USN1985dos Yeah, and? It doesn't change when they were made and how long they've been kept in service. It's not like they're cranking out new M1As, now are they?

  • @dave4882
    @dave4882 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +177

    they needed 300 abrams not 30. We have plenty in storage. I thought we refurbished these before we sent them. Why are the engines not rebuilt? not thrilled with my gov response.

    • @Brendissimo1
      @Brendissimo1 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +38

      Ukraine needs more tanks, sure, but it's nowhere close to their primary need. The priorities should be: artillery ammo and spare barrels; air defense munitions and systems (especially long range ones like Patriot); and armored transport, especially IFVs. With the way tanks are being used in this war (largely fire support, very little maneuver) they are not as important as other vehicles like IFVs. I would say if the US could spare more armor, we should send more Bradleys rather than more Abrams. The problem is the Bradley's replacement has not yet been selected yet, and is nowhere near production, so the US needs to keep a sizeable reserve to be upgraded for the future.

    • @Yakob135
      @Yakob135 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

      Don’t wanna burst your bubble but there’s no way we would give them 300 mbts lmao, maybe 300 Bradley’s and ifvs. Plus they need artillery and AA way more than they need tanks. There will always be oversight in preparation for war no one is immune to it.

    • @cloudstrife5209
      @cloudstrife5209 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Let's just send everything to Ukraine and then pray that China doesn't do something stupid. The truth is we can only send so much without compromising our own safety.

    • @todorpamukov7435
      @todorpamukov7435 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      dude,in this ukrainian battlefield tanks are siting ducks,drones just melt them....btw ukrainians do not air forces like atack hilos and theyr tanks are useless. Russians advatages with aviations,arty and drones make ukrainians tanks and BTR-s useless. And idk why continue this war....maybe western countrys wanna wipe out ukrainian state?

    • @RandomUserOnTheInterWebs
      @RandomUserOnTheInterWebs 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@cloudstrife5209 That's really not the case here. These tanks were not in active service. They were sitting in a storage depot waiting for a "just in case" scenario. This is that scenario. The war in Ukraine is fought on the ground. A war with China will have nothing to do with tanks, or artillery. It will be primarily a naval and air engagement, and it will actually be over pretty quick.
      Either China will be able to establish a foothold on Taiwan early on and block the US navy and airforce from reinforcing Taiwan, or it's landing forces will be destroyed. If it's the latter China will lose the ability to complete their primary goal of taking Taiwan by force. It won't take long to figure out what the outcome of that conflict will be. A month, maybe two at most.
      Two different theaters of war, two very different requirements. Old tech vs cutting edge tech. Helping Ukraine is helping us, because it's destroying Russia's ability to wage war, and assuring that if we do have a conflict with China that Russia won't factor into it.

  • @unwanted_zombie
    @unwanted_zombie 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +116

    She may not have the chobham armor, but abrams is better than no abrams. Kick ass, Slava Ukraini

    • @leandro9311
      @leandro9311 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

      They have Chobham, on the frontal hull plate both upper and lower, gun breach, turret sides and i would assume turret frontal plates in place of the depleted uranium armor, the U.S replaces the uranium armor with chobham for export sales

    • @HanSolo__
      @HanSolo__ 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      @@leandro9311 No depleted Uranium in anything outside the US Army, USMC, or National Guard.

    • @leandro9311
      @leandro9311 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      @@HanSolo__ Thats what i said

    • @HanSolo__
      @HanSolo__ 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@leandro9311 Oh, sorry. I did not get it from your comment.

    • @saltymonke3682
      @saltymonke3682 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      They have chobham, not the DU grapes

  • @greybuckleton
    @greybuckleton 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Great to see reporting from the front rather than just re quoting Ukrainian official statements. You get a much better feel for the reality of the situation.

  • @SamFBM
    @SamFBM 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +80

    hahah gotta love the eagle screech

    • @Keep3r1438
      @Keep3r1438 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Red tailed hawk

  • @dimasv22
    @dimasv22 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +150

    it’s embarrassing to give tanks in this condition, without protection and why just 31,US has thousands of them in storage?

    • @eduardadhi110
      @eduardadhi110 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      USA don't want to anger Putin even more....

    • @korypalmer4079
      @korypalmer4079 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +37

      They need air cover to be effective. Of course we have to supply that as well……..

    • @christopherwang4392
      @christopherwang4392 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +43

      The main reason is to convince Germany to approve providing the more available and plentiful Leopard 2 to Ukraine. It is easier for Ukraine to obtain Leopard 2s from throughout Europe than to have Abrams sent across the Atlantic Ocean from the United States. The Leopard 2s currently make up the bulk of Ukraine's Western model tanks. Nevertheless, both the Abrams and Leopard have and will continue to provide good service for Ukraine's soldiers.

    • @eduardadhi110
      @eduardadhi110 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@korypalmer4079 the main danger to tank is drone , I think NATO should research on electronic warfare to jam those suicide drone

    • @Rabidazell
      @Rabidazell 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

      The US hasn't deployed a armour solution to FPV drones for their own forces. There's wisdom in that to an extent, they're not currently fighting in a war and the drone situation is highly amorphic. In this footage you see about the most sophisticated armour addons for the platform in the world today, simply because they are in response to the most contemporary conflict. Australian Abrams, for example, are exactly the same base armour iirc (Thus why the Ukes want them when Australia replaces them). All the same, it's a worry there are outstanding logistical problems when there really shouldn't be. One of the arguments for supplying the tanks was that if Australia was capable of running them without an industrial infrastructure to supply parts, then why couldn't Ukraine? If the 47th are struggling, it's no good. So much admiration for that brigade. Three completely different type of tank in two years.

  • @keimolantio
    @keimolantio 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +36

    That tank is old as heaven. I won't do miracles but will help in a right role

    • @ElementalWarrior1999
      @ElementalWarrior1999 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Can they put a small auto shotgun on top of the tank to take out incoming drones? A type of designed shotgun that can detect drones miles away and shoot at it automatically once it approaches its range? It would be very useful..

    • @supremekingd775
      @supremekingd775 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Those are M1A1 Abrams tanks not M1A2’s. The United States is currently upgrading the 1’s into the 2’s but I’m pretty sure that they have more tanks either retired or in storage that they can spare.

    • @shivenbhupendra1100
      @shivenbhupendra1100 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@ElementalWarrior1999sounds a lot of like APS but with shotgun instead of explosive or kinetic impact object.

  • @Spiderman-zw5su
    @Spiderman-zw5su 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    As someone who traveled the world retrofiting the Abrams, this shit is wild!

  • @1MusicNote
    @1MusicNote 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    That tank is going to be a trophy oneday

  • @eoinocnaimhsi2598
    @eoinocnaimhsi2598 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

    Toughest men in the world, no competition. Taking non familiar tech, running it and even tweaking it under battlefield conditions is something NATO has no experience with.

    • @GalAxy-u9s
      @GalAxy-u9s 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      They had to add Soviet protection because their masters sent them the tanks after one year of preparation without reactive armour...

    • @jlo7770
      @jlo7770 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@GalAxy-u9swtf are you talking about? They came with reactive armor, did you not get anything from the video? The us has never fought a war where 500$ drones are being used in mass, no one has. It's not the us's responsibility to fund this war

    • @USN1985dos
      @USN1985dos 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      So that's false. Battlefield modifications were common in Iraq until they accelerated the TUSK programs.

  • @billyponsonby
    @billyponsonby 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +29

    Denmark, Belgium and Netherlands are sending 80 F16s this summer. According to reporting by DW, these will enable Ukraine to change to balance of air power particularly in border areas.

    • @mahdidehghan7437
      @mahdidehghan7437 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      Lol ok. Heard this before mate

    • @GalAxy-u9s
      @GalAxy-u9s 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Nothing of that is true but be my guest

    • @dioghaltasfoirneartach7258
      @dioghaltasfoirneartach7258 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@mahdidehghan7437

    • @dioghaltasfoirneartach7258
      @dioghaltasfoirneartach7258 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@GalAxy-u9s

    • @Withnail1969
      @Withnail1969 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      lol, sure they are. Where do you expect them to even fly from in Ukraine?

  • @DominikGentener
    @DominikGentener 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

    Thank you very much for this interesting report.

  • @GreenAppelPie
    @GreenAppelPie 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +27

    NATO and America need to stop messing around and give Ukraine the equipment needed to gain air superiority

    • @dalveal01
      @dalveal01 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      You can't just give the equipment. People need to be trained first and that take a while. Blame the EU for it

    • @Tomachine1
      @Tomachine1 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@dalveal01Most if not all the EU is in NATO.

    • @Alexein455
      @Alexein455 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The Czech Republic is a small country, but we gave what we had...

    • @burnttoaster6313
      @burnttoaster6313 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It’s has give over 1 trillion in aid!!! Where did all that go huh?

    • @USN1985dos
      @USN1985dos 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Why?

  • @phishphood423
    @phishphood423 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Very cool guys. Awesome vid, answered some of the questions I had about the makeshift armor, pretty well executed if you ask me. Seems designed to primarily defend against shaped charge rounds and artillery, of which there is…a lot on the battlefield. Very interesting.

  • @asmith1496
    @asmith1496 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Massive respect for these guys not only keeping these things running but also upgrading them with region specific mods!

  • @Happyminicat-00
    @Happyminicat-00 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +41

    Slava Ukraine!

    • @PoyrazDoldur
      @PoyrazDoldur 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Heroes to Slava

    • @todorpamukov7435
      @todorpamukov7435 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      this sound like hail hitler

  • @PoyrazDoldur
    @PoyrazDoldur 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +42

    Slava Ukraini 🇺🇦💙💛

  • @ISAFMobius18
    @ISAFMobius18 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    It's kinda surreal seeing the Abrams in a combat situation it was originally designed for. Good luck to the brave tanker crews

    • @clean713
      @clean713 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      And we saw, its not good lol

    • @ISAFMobius18
      @ISAFMobius18 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@clean713 I wouldn't say not good. Unfortunate maybe. 5 losses to weapons it was never designed to defend against its a given there would be possible losses

  • @ntsejfamyaj
    @ntsejfamyaj 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Given how well the M2A2/A3 Bradleys are doing, wouldn't it be more combat effective to trade the M1A1 Abrams for M2A2/A3 Bradleys? For the cost, you can get multiple Bradleys.

    • @danielcamacho1913
      @danielcamacho1913 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I thought people had belabored that over last year or so. The Abrams has some steep maintenance needs with the turbine engine and unique transmission (among other things), and the Bradley uses a turbo-Diesel engine like most other AFVs in the world.

  • @EpicThe112
    @EpicThe112 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I wonder if Nozh Explosive Reactive Armour can be fitted to the M1 Abrams if yes then it can be protected from 3BM60 3BM32 Vant but still vulnerable to 3BK21 which is HEAT shell with DU liner 3BM69/3BM70

  • @The_ZeroLine
    @The_ZeroLine 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Bradleys are much more useful and easier to maintain. Let’s forget about sending anymore M1s and instead send more of the thousands of M2s sitting in storage and slated to be retired. Any conflict with the PRC will not include the use of IFVs or MBTs .

    • @jlo7770
      @jlo7770 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That's some pretty wishful thinking. And the prc isn't the only possible threat

    • @pogo1140
      @pogo1140 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The Bradley is in demand with the US until replacements are available

    • @anssiluomaranta34
      @anssiluomaranta34 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      this may well be an accurate assessment. just look at what ukraine is doing with FPV drones, marine drones and other high-tech solutions. now imagine what the US could do with it's resources if it really needed to. unless there is an effective counter to drones IFVs and MBTs are going to be useless. Remember - future drones don't even need radio connection. Their onboard AI can guide them to their targets so they can't be jammed. Ukraine is already field-testing this.

    • @jlo7770
      @jlo7770 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@anssiluomaranta34 oh I'm sure the powers across the world have been working on a solution that isn't just carpet bombing the f out of everything as a means to combat drones. They'll still have weaknesses. I half believe there's a chance the world goes backwards in battles due to the effectiveness of drones, and by that I mean usingemp's.knocking out all electronics would cause mass chaos in this day and age, not being able to call artillery no drones, ect.. they'll figure something out to get them out of the sky even if they're AI controlled.(I wonder how many of their own people ai drones will kill lmfao). I thought about it and had the same thought about tanks and being a dying breed but having a tank that's armored and you can roll up to a house and level it is just too important(?), they'll figure out how to take out drones before getting rid of mbt's and ifv's.. in some cases it's too dangerous to move troops without armor, and if you can't insert troops then the battle would never change.
      I do give it to Russia for coming up with drone jammers and even "jamming guns" its really something no one expected and was so random but to ukraines credit, most countries have reapr's or other types of drones in the air to watch what's going on. Having a 1000$ drone that's compact and fairly fast is huge for a conventional war, it's natural that someone was sitting there watching the screen and thought "if only I could fly this thing into them". But like I said every country is working on a means to effectively protect against dronesz there will always be a weakness to exploit.
      Lol shooting lasers at them... or have a mini gun that's essentially drone air defense

  • @abdushevarlan5403
    @abdushevarlan5403 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Слава Украине, всего наилучшего вам. Салем из Алматы, Казахстан)

    • @kabochakabocha3561
      @kabochakabocha3561 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      самое коррумпированное государство в средней азии 😄

  • @cristian333GTX
    @cristian333GTX 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    3:56 that technician know about tanks and know about cars love to see wearing a t shirt Toyota 💪🏼.

  • @Shelmerdine745
    @Shelmerdine745 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +33

    Symbolic aid at best. they need like 500 tanks and air support for them to make difference.
    They are too heavy for that theater, anyway.

    • @stolek6908
      @stolek6908 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      They got 500+ tanks from all over the europe and ruskies reckt them all

    • @tinymoegaming
      @tinymoegaming 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Damn and the wars pushing 3 years with russian oil refineries and airfields bruning on russian soil 500+ all dead your numbers are funny​@@stolek6908

    • @tinymoegaming
      @tinymoegaming 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

      Yet 3 years of war from a 3day operation 😂​@stolek6908

    • @Nikowalker007
      @Nikowalker007 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      They received only 16% of what they requested…. Which is less than 100 tanks total . There’s only that much you can do

    • @Robert53area
      @Robert53area 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@tinymoegaming russia never said it would be 3 days, the US said it would be 3 days.

  • @surak1841
    @surak1841 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Are there any still left working? I know they were not the best package from the US but you would think their MBT would last a wee bit longer.

  • @michaelanderson3096
    @michaelanderson3096 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Polymer slat armour works too + magnetrons.

  • @01bigtrev
    @01bigtrev 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What happened to the start streak mobile anti air defence? I thought they were also deployed

  • @GavinAkers-mg4nd
    @GavinAkers-mg4nd 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Older M1s that haven’t been upgraded will be like that. Honestly I like how they basically made TUSK II with the m19 tiles on the turret side.

  • @mattskallerud6718
    @mattskallerud6718 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    the quote brad pitt said having the best job in the world isn't just about tankers, it's veterans themselves having the best job in the world.

  • @tatianacrehuet1065
    @tatianacrehuet1065 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Love and eternal admiration to the Ukrainian people♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️

  • @itowmyhome797
    @itowmyhome797 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you for posting a much higher quality video than the usual stock footage Crap.

  • @CalixtoLlido
    @CalixtoLlido 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Good morning frmgingoog ctymendanao philippine

  • @rlgsofficial
    @rlgsofficial 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Some errors made in this video to point out:
    - Kontakt 1 ERA was developed, and mass produced by the Soviet Union not Ukraine
    - Kontakt 1 isn't immune from AGMs, UVs, and Lancets and it can't withstand/block anything, all it takes is for the munition used to have/use a Tandem Shaped Warhead and Kontakt 1 would provide next to no protection against it.

    • @vfgfdfdf
      @vfgfdfdf 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Ukraine was in the Soviet Union dum dum

    • @usuariopimba707
      @usuariopimba707 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@vfgfdfdf NII Stali (Russian: НИИ стали), is a Russian research institute (NII) located in the capital city of Moscow dum dum.

    • @vfgfdfdf
      @vfgfdfdf 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@usuariopimba707 Be that as it may, the previous commenter mentioned the Soviet Union as though it did not include Ukraine. Which is false.

    • @usuariopimba707
      @usuariopimba707 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@vfgfdfdf It doesn't matter, the factory is Russian not Ukrainian as it says in the video

    • @rael5469
      @rael5469 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@usuariopimba707 For Christ sake, by saying "Ukrainian Kontakt ERA" he only meant that is was some that they possessed. I don't think he meant any copy-write infringement.......for crying out loud.

  • @hillsidesmoke7592
    @hillsidesmoke7592 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hmmm how often are they cleaning the VPacks ?

  • @Lodagreat-q8y
    @Lodagreat-q8y 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It's a older abumas like the man said it's about 40 years old that's what I figured the is would do they gave them the older tanks so It makes sense that they had to put on the relative armor and having engine problems

  • @CSA-359
    @CSA-359 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    USA has 6000 Abrams in service and nearly 10.000 Tanks stored in desert. And they deliver 31.

    • @obsidianjane4413
      @obsidianjane4413 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      That is false.

    • @jlo7770
      @jlo7770 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I know they should have sent 0 Abrams

    • @duoblade332
      @duoblade332 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      If anything they should send more old M1A1s that we dont use, gets them into battle and gets the burden off our hands

    • @obsidianjane4413
      @obsidianjane4413 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@duoblade332 Leo 2s are still a better choice for the Ukrainians.

    • @skyz6708
      @skyz6708 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@obsidianjane4413 Germany already unloaded a heap of Leopard 1's and early Leopard 2's to Ukraine.

  • @Peter-lm3ic
    @Peter-lm3ic 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Non the less it has been said that the best tank overall of the MBT's in operation in the Ukraine is the T62. Mainly for four reasons: 1) It has a lower silhouette, important in flat country. 2) It is lighter. 3) it's bound track pressure is low. 4) There is many of them. This war will make many rethink their equipment.

    • @danielcamacho1913
      @danielcamacho1913 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Did a T-62 have manual loading? If it has a carousel auto-loader like all the other Ruzzian tanks in Ukraine, then driving a T-62 is yet another way for tankers to be promoted to cosmonauts.

    • @Anonymous-is6xu
      @Anonymous-is6xu 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@danielcamacho19131. Yes, the T-62 has a human loader. Its a bad tank, partially because of this reason besides its obvious age
      2. The autoloader is not the reason for ammunition detonations. The primary reason is extra ammunition outside of the carousel being stored in the crew compartment, specifically in the turret where the tank is most likely to be hit. The carousel itself sits very low in the hull, is protected by shrapnel guards, and the T-72/T-90 series uses an electrical rather than hydraulic mechanism which doesn’t catch on fire. So the problem is the crew storing extra ammunition everywhere in the crew compartment, and many NATO tanks like the Challenger 2 also suffer from the same problem, which stores it’s propellant charges in the crew compartment too.

  • @TerronBlack-hu5xi
    @TerronBlack-hu5xi 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    They be putting that shit on everything 💀💀💀

  • @mckappe
    @mckappe 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    They are irresistible! We even saw some in Moscow...

  • @jaytm6719
    @jaytm6719 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    SLAVA UKRAINI! 🇺🇦 🇺🇸

  • @azeke8
    @azeke8 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The problem with Abrams tanks is that they only received armor upgrades in the turret cheeks. The turret sides and hull front are vulnerable to modern anti-tank weaponry. Even the cheeks are vulnerable to Kornet-M ATGM, which is why Kontakt-1 ERA or slats armor are placed there. The roof is obviously extremely vulnerable to drones, but that is true for pretty much any tank in service, since manufacturers are yet to adopt to the realities of modern battlefield.

  • @PIZZA_KITTY
    @PIZZA_KITTY 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I want to call this tank - Slavrams

  • @GTMemes2
    @GTMemes2 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Something got lost in the translation
    " This side toward vehicle "
    Had that side away from the vehicle wtf?

  • @eyeZitsme
    @eyeZitsme 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    May you all come home safe

  • @KennyMcDermott-y2x
    @KennyMcDermott-y2x 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    Slava ukraini 🫡🇺🇦🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿

  • @dimas128
    @dimas128 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Thats going against decommunization

  • @roselojrvalera2588
    @roselojrvalera2588 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    There were so few M1A1 Abrams tanks there were sent to Ukraine. Only 31.. The US should send more rather than having these tanks in storage..

    • @poochie5543
      @poochie5543 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Nope

    • @PhantomAviation44
      @PhantomAviation44 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Why not? All else they are gonna do is sit in storage ​@@poochie5543

  • @AlphariousOmegon-d5d
    @AlphariousOmegon-d5d 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This could be the first real test for the Abrams, the other deployments have been a walk in the park in comparison. Ukraine using solo, compared to a US combined arms combat team

  • @johndoran3274
    @johndoran3274 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I’ve heard from first hand accounts, that only 5 Abrams are operational at most because of the losses in combat and the scavenging of parts off of some to make the others operational. How things have changed where a $500 drone can easily take out a multi million dollar machine in the blink of an eye.

  • @vitaliyvitaliy7896
    @vitaliyvitaliy7896 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    30 old tanks without proper defence after 2 and a half year of war, what a great gift from our American friends.
    At the same time Poland gave to Ukraine about 400 tanks!

  • @PROLIFIC_TRAVELS
    @PROLIFIC_TRAVELS 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Re assembling a tank to suit it to best for your fightinf style plus terrain is just common sense

  • @stormy1055
    @stormy1055 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Note that the abrams is from decades ago against the new russian tank it still slaps

    • @TomPatrick2000
      @TomPatrick2000 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      a dated 120mm gun is still a 120mm gun

  • @alexshank1414
    @alexshank1414 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    If you you think the tanks are too high maintenance and a liability, don’t use them. Honestly, should be grateful that you were sent aid.

  • @supremekingd775
    @supremekingd775 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Damn it’s hard to tell that this tank is an American Abrams tank. It’s more like an American Russian hybrid tank with all of that reactive armor plating. Hopefully it can last a lot longer on the battlefield.

  • @X-7-JAMES
    @X-7-JAMES 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I think Ukraine has only lost one Abrams tank. This is a great, realistic video. Thank you.

    • @blndmn
      @blndmn 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      more then 10 tho

    • @TomPatrick2000
      @TomPatrick2000 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      they have lost many more

    • @PhantomAviation44
      @PhantomAviation44 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They've lost 5

  • @ghst3617
    @ghst3617 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Looks like war thunder would add that new Variant of m1 Abrams in their game 💀

  • @thewedge8823
    @thewedge8823 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I saw this in Moscow!! It was in much worse shape than it is here lol

    • @danielcamacho1913
      @danielcamacho1913 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      And yet, the turret was still attached, and there were no skeletons inside.

    • @Anonymous-is6xu
      @Anonymous-is6xu 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@danielcamacho1913”b-b-but the turret is still attached even though the tank is scorched to a crisp!”

    • @Alikerry
      @Alikerry 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Anonymous-is6xu no skeletons inside was probably the more important point in his statement

  • @Baytremm
    @Baytremm 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Wow they did more improvements in Abrams then we do getting new tanks this improsive

  • @MadWizard89
    @MadWizard89 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    nice job from us to translate it to ukrainian.

  • @sf2372
    @sf2372 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Finally some food for thought, all those positive light videos of UKR but in reality many poor souls are getting smashed with aircraft and attack choppers. They are still missing many tools to fight this war properly I think.

  • @petter5721
    @petter5721 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    A tank is like an aircraft carrier, they fight in groups.
    It needs to be supported by Combat vehicles and AA….

  • @FunfairDiaries
    @FunfairDiaries 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Lets hope they go longer than last time when they were pulled back for mods

  • @SMB96
    @SMB96 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    02:45 Literaly says "this side toward vehicle"
    You guys sure thats right?
    🤣

    • @duoblade332
      @duoblade332 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      He pulled it off the tank to show the inside

  • @shyamdevadas6099
    @shyamdevadas6099 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The Ukrainians are amazing! They re-engine the tanks. They build their own reactive armor! They modify what is considered to be top-notch military hardware to suit their applications. This is impressive. If for nothing else, the U.S. should want to support these guys to keep them as strategic allies. (Frankly, we give so much money and support to the Israelis and they don't listen to us and they do stupid things that complicate our own interests. Thus far, the Ukrainians have been better partners.)

  • @Youtuber-k2p
    @Youtuber-k2p 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    1:43 angle grinder marks, something was removed here. 2:15 “lancet drone came at us while we were standing still, waiting for our orders”, we keep hearing that mobility is the key to survival in this war. 2:46 “this side towards vehicle”, era facing the wrong way? 3:42 40 year old engines! The seals are old and not fit for purpose, so all the old mothballed tanks is what Ukraine got. Tying up maintenance time, especially as they have to replace whole engines, why couldn’t these Abrams have been serviced before sending them? “Not suitable for the Donetsk region”, I thought Abrams was designed specifically for a European war with Russia!

    • @pogo1140
      @pogo1140 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Servicing tank engines is an ongoing thing, the more you use it the more often it has to be serviced.
      The AGT1500 engine is expected to last 1,400 hours but it needs to be serviced.
      Air filters need to be replaced every 12 hours of operation.
      And while most repairs can be done with the engine in the tank, pulling the entire engine out takes about an hour.

  • @Mr.Justin_S
    @Mr.Justin_S 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I've said from the beginning that it will not matter what tanks are sent to Ukraine if they do not have aviation to support them.

    • @jlo7770
      @jlo7770 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Maybe they should have invested in their airforce in the 30 years they've been a sovereign country... instead they "elect" corrupt politicians that funnel money out of the country into their own pockets. I don't see why it's the US's responsibility to fund this war and hold their hands.

  • @zwelch1662
    @zwelch1662 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    The Abrams will always be the Best Tank in my Eyes 🇺🇸🇺🇦

    • @GalAxy-u9s
      @GalAxy-u9s 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      If you say so...

    • @zwelch1662
      @zwelch1662 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@GalAxy-u9s I Do 🇺🇸🇺🇦

  • @grunky0
    @grunky0 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    Too little too late, 31 tanks and that's it!?!? America has a ton of tanks in storage. Now they're just a high logistic waste, deployed sparingly.

    • @ABoredDemon
      @ABoredDemon 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      so what if 300 Abrams are sent? you need crews for them and repairmen to fix them. Getting ether of those will take another half a year and even then it'll only be a fraction of what's needed to field 300 Abrams

    • @Brendissimo1
      @Brendissimo1 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      And refurbishing them or upgrading them for Ukraine takes time. Ukraine also has dozens of types of tanks in service at this point, they may not want a bunch of Abrams. The only reason they were even sent in the first place was to force Germany to stop denying Ukraine's request for Leopards. Not that Abrams aren't useful, but they don't make the most sense for Ukraine, it seems to me.

    • @todorpamukov7435
      @todorpamukov7435 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      you can send all weapons in the world there but they do not man power so what is next.....direct conflict between nato and russia? Everyone know what will be the result.....bye bye humanity

  • @stonefish1318
    @stonefish1318 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    💛🔱💙 Slava Ukraini! Heroyam Slava! ❤️☠️🖤

    • @sergeyaviastar7148
      @sergeyaviastar7148 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Slava sharovaram!!! Slava Usranii!!

  • @HuhuJuri
    @HuhuJuri 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    This is exactly why the US was hesitant to deliver Abrams to Ukraine - the Leopard is much more suited to the situation.

    • @mcblaze1968
      @mcblaze1968 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      AFU always wanted Leopards more. For a lot good reasons. People forget that these M-1s were given to get the ball rolling on tanks for Ukraine. No one wanted to go first, so the US did.

    • @davidhopkins9021
      @davidhopkins9021 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      ​@mcblaze1968 no they didn't the uk was the first to send mbts typical yanks no idea

    • @AbusiveFlash
      @AbusiveFlash 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@mcblaze1968 Think you'll find the UK commited its challenger 2 MBTs first.

    • @vfgfdfdf
      @vfgfdfdf 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Germany refused to send leapards until USA sent Abrams though​@@davidhopkins9021

    • @Sajuuk
      @Sajuuk 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      No it isn't why. USA refused M1s because they're scared of "escalation" i.e. scared of Putin.

  • @Lobos222
    @Lobos222 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Russian vodniks will cry when the Ukrainian tech tree becomes dominant in Warthunder in 2030.

  • @Nickles4
    @Nickles4 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    How long before war thunder makes this a premium

  • @corporalsilver6981
    @corporalsilver6981 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I'm not ripping on US tanks, but there is something oddly ironic about the fact that the Abrams is covered in the 'Cope Cage' armour package of chicken wire.

  • @AlexanderK9519
    @AlexanderK9519 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Ukrainian Abrams are 2009 M1A1 SA variant which is the same one the US ARMY has in service right now

    • @ssn22
      @ssn22 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      no is not you russian bot !!

    • @MbtHub
      @MbtHub 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      2001 actually

  • @AndrewLambert-wi8et
    @AndrewLambert-wi8et 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    ONLY 31 TANKS. JOKERS!

  • @mitchdaytonam3
    @mitchdaytonam3 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    7:45 - the gap Max overcame in 2022 was 46 points buddy, not 69 or more.
    Still loving your videos, but still going to continue to point out your errors, it’s nothing personal, it’s just important to get the facts and figures correct; it adds to your credibility. 👍

  • @dominuslogik484
    @dominuslogik484 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I have noticed that almost all of the vehicles in use in Ukraine have a scorched look to them, its like everything has been covered in black and brown and I am unsure if it is intentional or just all the stuff caked onto the outside.

  • @alanbailey5621
    @alanbailey5621 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The US military sure got taken to the cleaners with the Abrams. A gas turbine ? Give me an air cooled diesel any day.

  • @Asymmetrical-Saggin
    @Asymmetrical-Saggin 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    Performances have been subpar and even bad at times because they're not being used how they're supposed to be. They're built for US doctrine.. and when Ukraine uses them in a complete different way, without any air support and the minimal ground support they send them into the thick of the frontlines you're going to get the results that they have had with some of them. Also aren't built to be a full offensive moving mbt in Eastern Europe..being too heavy for most bridges over there and all the mud the ground turns into half the year.

    • @Nikowalker007
      @Nikowalker007 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      When you fight relatively modern army and not bearded dudes in sandals your stuff is going to get destroyed , Russia has already lost more than 30 T90Ms , its most modern and powerful tank. Drones+guided artillery combo are the biggest game changer today no modern tank is immune from them

    • @Nikowalker007
      @Nikowalker007 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That’s what happens when you fight relatively modern army and not bearded dudes in bath towels and sandals …. No modern tank is immune to Drones and guided arty missiles. Russia has already lost more than 30 T90Ms its most modern and powerful mbt and over 1000 T72s . It’s just the way things are today

    • @JustaGuy1250
      @JustaGuy1250 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@Nikowalker007 Want to know a big difference?
      Russia has designed the T-90M to be way cheaper, quicker and easier to produce (like anything soviet/russian) which results in 30 losses of T-90Ms not being as big of a deal as 30 losses of the M1A1, especially when it's from a foreign country.
      Russia can afford T-90M losses, Ukraine CANNOT afford M1A1 losses, and they've already lost a big portion of what they received. Not to mention Russian tanks are now equipped to be somewhat less of a target for small FPV drones while the M1A1, the gigantic tank that it is, is a big target with a big weakspot on the back of the turret.

    • @crazymachinima1
      @crazymachinima1 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@JustaGuy1250 True, M1A1's are definitely much harder to replace than T-90Ms, but the USA have quite a bunch in storage. More could be sent if politics allow it.
      I'd say you're overestimating the size difference. T-90M is pretty much equally big as an Abrams is, except for being around 50 cm lower, which doesn't seem like such a gamechanger.

    • @lorenzcassidy3960
      @lorenzcassidy3960 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Nikowalker007 Mines. Don't forget the mines, bud.
      Ukraine has become the most mined country in the solar system!

  • @n0bly_hades
    @n0bly_hades 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    They better add Leo’s with ERA in war thunder

  • @innerdinosaur2757
    @innerdinosaur2757 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    Slava Ukraini 🇺🇦🦖✊

  • @tibor1234
    @tibor1234 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The M1 made the whole way up to Moscow. Gj you won the war ...

  • @NesconProductions
    @NesconProductions 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    The Ukrainians could use a couple hundred more of them (currently rusting in storage..) preferably equipped with the latest gen. of active defensive protection.

    • @jlo7770
      @jlo7770 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes because we want US tech falling into Russian hands because they flew a 500$ drone into it. They're getting our old garbage for a reason. Lol us wouldn't even sale tiawan f35's for fear that the gen 5 tech would be leaked to China. The stuff is top secret and will be for another 20-30 years... giving our best equipment to a 3rd world country is asinine.

    • @xxdmoneyxx4968
      @xxdmoneyxx4968 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      No. As a US citizen these are my tanks and they’re staying in storage

    • @Sachiel-Imaizumi
      @Sachiel-Imaizumi 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@xxdmoneyxx4968 Yes, As a US citizen these old war chariots should be given to Ukraine, we are literally never going to fucking use them, they're going to rust in storage and just be scrapped, these tanks are older Abrams and are outdated, and we should let them do what they were built for or go out with a bang, you do not seem to understand that these things are going to be scrapped no matter what so that they can be replaced with newer M1A2 variants, nor are they your tanks either, the government will never sell an Abrams to a civilian

    • @poochie5543
      @poochie5543 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ⁠@@Sachiel-Imaizumiya no, not only did the citizens pay for the cost of the vehicle, but now we gotta pay for logistics in crossing the Atlantic! And then you wonder why everything is so much more expensive here, it’s because of unnecessary spending for things that don’t benefit our people.

    • @themilkman8554
      @themilkman8554 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Sachiel-Imaizumi " we are literally never going to fucking use them" I can't tell if you really have no idea what you're saying or if you think you're actually right. Ah yes, with that logic we should give them ALL of our entire military equipment. Cause were NEVER gonna use it! Who would attack America!?

  • @asynchronicity
    @asynchronicity 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦

  • @Mike.Muc.3.1415
    @Mike.Muc.3.1415 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The U.S. Army has 3,450 more M1A1 and M1A2 in storage alone.

  • @anthonykaiser974
    @anthonykaiser974 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    For all the folks whining about how the US only sent 31 tanks, that served one purpose: to get Germany to act. Everyone agrees that Leo 2 is a better fit for Ukraine.

    • @GalAxy-u9s
      @GalAxy-u9s 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      So what was the Abrams built for?

    • @anthonykaiser974
      @anthonykaiser974 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@GalAxy-u9s quit making more out of this than what it was always about. The whole point, and why we opted to send A1s vs making new A2s is we were trying to get Scholz to come off the Leo 2s. A1s got that job done more quickly all around. What the Ukrainians don't need is a ton of two or three different tank models, particularly given the limitations with drones everywhere. A battalion of Abrams' is a minor nuisance acceptable given the tradeoff of getting the Leo 2s they really need. US money ISO UA is best spent on artillery ammo, GMLRS and ATACMS, and BFVs

    • @rael5469
      @rael5469 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@GalAxy-u9s You are exactly correct. Abrams was specifically built for EXACTLY this battle. To go up against Russian tanks in a "European" environment.
      Furthermore, I am less interested in how many Abrams have been lost than in......did they earn their keep while they were fighting. That's all you can ask of any soldier. To make the enemy lose by costing them more than they cost us.

  • @chadnelson1777
    @chadnelson1777 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This tank is a 90’s era tank the M1A1. So you have to fight with it differently. I noticed some Ukrainian’s use it wrong. It’s an older tank with older technology. They should’ve sent the M1A2 tank. It has all the updated variants. But of course they won’t

    • @PhantomAviation44
      @PhantomAviation44 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They don't want the Russians reverse engineering the m1a2 i guess

  • @gokulraja2812
    @gokulraja2812 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Waiting abhrams vs T90m legendery battle

    • @rael5469
      @rael5469 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Horrific....but still, from an engineering point of view it would be a magnificent Battle Royale.

    • @MarekKrassus53
      @MarekKrassus53 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      One of the M1A1s was destroyed by a T-72B3.

    • @rael5469
      @rael5469 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@MarekKrassus53 How many T-72s were destroyed by the Abrams first? Don't bother.

    • @kabochakabocha3561
      @kabochakabocha3561 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@rael5469 0???? They've never fought

    • @briskxd1093
      @briskxd1093 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@kabochakabocha3561 No they have in the Iraq war.

  • @HARRAWISH
    @HARRAWISH 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    i hope their armor is better than in war thunder 💀💀

  • @amitmou2009
    @amitmou2009 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Pls show us some footage of t90 turrets flyinng

    • @artex1890
      @artex1890 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      I can show you ukraines tank turrets flying!

    • @amitmou2009
      @amitmou2009 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I'm sure you can Kremlin bot..

    • @USN1985dos
      @USN1985dos 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      How about some footage of Ukrainian Leopard turrets flying?

    • @PhantomAviation44
      @PhantomAviation44 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@USN1985doslol when?

  • @evilfingers4302
    @evilfingers4302 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Age is not the only reason why the Abrams engine requires a lot of maintenance, the engine is a Turbocharged Turbine.

    • @HanSolo__
      @HanSolo__ 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      What's a "Turbocharged Turbine"?

    • @pogo1140
      @pogo1140 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The Turbine does not have a Turbocharger.
      And for everyone about to say that it needs jet fuel, the turbine will run on gasoline, diesel, vodka, kerosene, lamp oil, cooking oil, even the oil used to make french fries

  • @BoldHorse
    @BoldHorse 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Good soviet kontakt 1 still holds up today.

  • @cetri777
    @cetri777 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    avdiivka? its gone months ago

  • @stanleydomalewski8497
    @stanleydomalewski8497 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Best Wishes and God Bless !