DexTAR :: The fastest five-bar parallel robot

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 12 ก.ค. 2012
  • A smaller version was commercially available: • Affordable dual-arm SC... .
    DexTAR (Dextrous Twin-Arm Robot) is the fastest five-bar parallel robot with the largest workspace possible. In order to take full advantage of its workspace, the robot crosses Type 1 (serial) singularities. In addition, the trajectory between two Cartesian positions is optimized in terms of cycle time. The robot's end-effector can accelerate up to 25 Gs.
  • วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี

ความคิดเห็น • 84

  • @miguelcontreras5782
    @miguelcontreras5782 4 ปีที่แล้ว +98

    It’d be cool to see it draw

    • @CoRoETS
      @CoRoETS  4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      This is the commercialized version doing a drawing: th-cam.com/video/RoI0rjaVzKI/w-d-xo.html

    • @miguelcontreras5782
      @miguelcontreras5782 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      CoRoETS maybe it’s following a path that you could call a drawing, but it isn’t tracing lines on any sort of canvas, it would be cool if you could put a pencil holder on it and make complex drawing very fast

    • @CoRoETS
      @CoRoETS  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      th-cam.com/video/RoI0rjaVzKI/w-d-xo.html

    • @DigitalXrisXros
      @DigitalXrisXros 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      pancake art

  • @zeugundso
    @zeugundso 10 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    I love how you guys use the "deadspot" to allow different working areas, really brilliant!

    • @CoRoETS
      @CoRoETS  10 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Johannes, do you solve the inverse kinematics for the plotclock? In other words, can you draw a straight line or a circle, or you just teach your "robot" by hand and then reproduce the motion?

    • @zeugundso
      @zeugundso 10 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      github.com/9a/plotclock/ see for yourself :) thankfully scara IK isn't too complicated

  • @CoRoETS
    @CoRoETS  11 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    OK, we call these working modes, i.e., the four different solutions of the inverse kinematics. We choose the working mode that leads to fastests cycle time. More details can be found in the paper listed in the description of the video.

    • @vidznstuff1
      @vidznstuff1 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi - do you have a link to the paper? I don't see it there. thanks

    • @edwinm.6642
      @edwinm.6642 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hello, what type of motor are those two?

  • @boxsterpontus
    @boxsterpontus 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Quite a few "battle scars" on that bot.
    You did some stellar work on understanding these strange bots. It really helped me while implementing a firmware for a 3D printer with the same kinematics. Your papers were not an easy read but well worth the effort.

    • @carlosmacedo4792
      @carlosmacedo4792 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      where could i find those papers? please

    • @moth.monster
      @moth.monster 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      do you have a writeup or video about that printer? would love to see it, maybe try and build my own :)

    • @boxsterpontus
      @boxsterpontus 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@moth.monster , I do not have a write up, but I have a few videos of various version on my channel. It was quite a challenge to make it stable using only hardware store and 3d printed plastic parts.

  • @CoRoETS
    @CoRoETS  11 ปีที่แล้ว +26

    No, this robot is not redundant. It has two direct-drive motors that control the XY displacements of the end-effector, and one pneumatic piston that controls the Z displacement of the end-effector.

    • @Gunth0r
      @Gunth0r 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      ok, roboomer.

  • @QuentinHarleyZA
    @QuentinHarleyZA 11 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    Now this is what happens when you have real robotics, and proper materials. So flattered that you compared my humble Morgan reprap to this machine. Thanks

  • @FurryEskimo
    @FurryEskimo 4 ปีที่แล้ว +30

    I fear the day when robots learn karate..

    • @marco-me1uh
      @marco-me1uh 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      and.. brobot is black bot brother

    • @haworthluke
      @haworthluke 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      lol atlas is getting there that thing is more nimble than 99% of humans

    • @N3m3sls
      @N3m3sls 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Karate is harmless.

  • @jerryoconnor9988
    @jerryoconnor9988 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Technology is changing so fast my head is going to explode

  • @1kreature
    @1kreature 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    So going from the lower to the upper area of the addressable space appears to be slower than moving within the separate regions?
    Also, Is underconstraint during the flipover an issue?

  • @channelname10yearsago68
    @channelname10yearsago68 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Damn. That accuracy.

  • @tcurdt
    @tcurdt 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I am wondering how such a parallel robot compares to a cartesian or corexy in terms of positioning accuracy and weight it can support.

  • @gf6368
    @gf6368 4 ปีที่แล้ว +27

    how did you solve the singularity problem?

    • @ezrakainz
      @ezrakainz 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      It looks like they just avoid flipping the linkage, and tightly control the relative positions of the motors in software.

    • @HermanWillems
      @HermanWillems 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@ezrakainz Yep and the motors are both placed more to the back. So no need for flipping the linkage.

    • @tculig
      @tculig 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      What singularity problem? Aw snap....

    • @renecabuhan1675
      @renecabuhan1675 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      No need to solve the singularity since it moves only in 2d.

  • @pkmcnc
    @pkmcnc 11 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Great robot, just when I have this idea I see it already done )
    What's the software and electronics?
    The servo period must be short for the speed.

  • @abpccpba
    @abpccpba 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very nice work : - ))

  • @nou4898
    @nou4898 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    0:54 some sort of remix might sound good

  • @GPA546
    @GPA546 11 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I am afraid there is no such thing as "ambiguous constellations". You most probably mean singularities. This robot has two types of them: serial (when one of the two arms is fully stretched) and parallel (when the two distal links are aligned). DexTAR passes through serial singularities only and this is fairly easy. We cannot (and do not want to) pass through parallel singularities. However, some researchers do that by deactivating both motors just before a parallel singularity.

  • @Cpt.PickHard
    @Cpt.PickHard 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Man that thing would make a hell of a cnc machine

  • @zouzoutayeb9899
    @zouzoutayeb9899 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hello, I have a question sir. Is there a danger zone in this robot, I mean when the two arms get touched between themselves. If yes, how to avoid it. Thanks . Great work by the way.

  • @eltonm.t.873
    @eltonm.t.873 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I would like to build one of these to drill holes on square tubes in a little fabrication production line where the table which holds the square tube or plate would raise to drill the tube while this positioning divice would put the drill in position according to a pre- programmed pattern by a CNC.

  • @sawomirgontarek8166
    @sawomirgontarek8166 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    this is open source project or commercial?

  • @CatNolara
    @CatNolara 11 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Ah, thats interesting. But what I was thinking of: to achieve a specified coordinate, there are more ways than one for each arm. So, how do you determine, which constellation is chosen?

    • @LimitedWard
      @LimitedWard 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      They could use some form of gradient descent.

  • @CatNolara
    @CatNolara 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Right, it's a closed kinematic chain. A rectangle for examble has 4 joints, but only one DOF.
    I'm just wondering, how you are escaping all the ambigous constellations?

  • @desys.
    @desys. 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Amazing

  • @PolytechNick
    @PolytechNick 11 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Not really redundant if you need fixed orientation of the end effector - by using the parallel scheme you effectively remove one motor. In other words, you would need 3 motors had you used a SCARA. Besides, since both motors are used to create the movement, the available torque and therefore speed are just nothing short of amazing

  • @jamesbrown99991
    @jamesbrown99991 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    When you need to move a ball bearing between holes, this 'bot has you covered.

  • @eltonm.t.873
    @eltonm.t.873 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    This machine is so fast I would name it "The Kung-Fu CNC" :)

  • @DSB.TecnologiaMaker
    @DSB.TecnologiaMaker 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Interesting !!!

  • @antariksavvan
    @antariksavvan 4 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Somebody please sample this and make music out of it

  • @AdityaSingh-hx1tv
    @AdityaSingh-hx1tv 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Which motion profile is used?

  • @sawomirgontarek8166
    @sawomirgontarek8166 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What are the costs to produce such a robot?

  • @danielkarl3688
    @danielkarl3688 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Whats the velocity vs speed i wonder

  • @WaynesStrangeBrain
    @WaynesStrangeBrain 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Freaky fast!!

  • @manman-sg1zt
    @manman-sg1zt 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    What engines are these

  • @kishandarji6256
    @kishandarji6256 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    can you tell me the maximum speed and acceleration with which it is moving ? please

  • @renecabuhan1675
    @renecabuhan1675 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I salute to the programmer. I know its very hard.

  • @satyampandey2222
    @satyampandey2222 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Damn it's fast

  • @C4ndleJ4ck
    @C4ndleJ4ck 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Should have called it Iron Mantis

  • @davec.3198
    @davec.3198 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What is the advantage of this over a $10k SCARA? Or it could just be that the SCARA's have advanced that much in the past 7 years since this was posted.

  • @mysticalsoulqc
    @mysticalsoulqc 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    yo bro, nice!

  • @vivdlyvague6627
    @vivdlyvague6627 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Beat drops at 1:43

  • @Amipotsophspond
    @Amipotsophspond 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    can you draw a square with it?

  • @Alastorik
    @Alastorik 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    что это за два движка ?

  • @fourteencrows1244
    @fourteencrows1244 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Scary

  • @maxmustermann1203
    @maxmustermann1203 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    It's a gen jutsu!!!

  • @CarstenHodes
    @CarstenHodes 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    can this be converted to a 3d-printer?

    • @MaxNoble440
      @MaxNoble440 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      it could have 3D printing applications.

  • @uncleswell
    @uncleswell 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    What sort of Kung Fu insect is this

  • @CoRoETS
    @CoRoETS  11 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The controller is an old PC running MathWorks' xPC Target and with a Quanser's Q8 card. The controller was programmed in Simulink. The control law is Computed Torque. The sampling time is 1 ms. The motor drives are the one sold with the direct-drive motors.

  • @sullivanroger9820
    @sullivanroger9820 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    is this redundant robot cause the robot has 2 degree of freedom (translational X-Y)and five joints (passive +active)as i think.. great job

  • @MultiUser45
    @MultiUser45 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    У этого робота есть "мертвая зона". Не сможет провести линию на на равно расстоянии от осей моторов.

  • @eduardbalalykin5339
    @eduardbalalykin5339 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Jake Chan.

  • @williamhuang5329
    @williamhuang5329 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hanzhen harmonic gear , robot gear reducer, 30 years experience

  • @aaronlowe3156
    @aaronlowe3156 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Whoa what the hell

  • @chrispizz1327
    @chrispizz1327 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    It's only 4 bars moving , not 5 !

  • @devjock
    @devjock 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why does this robot remind me of "Igorrr - Very Noise"?

  • @KarlMiller
    @KarlMiller 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Who uses the word singularity to describe a robot - RU trying to get the species taken over!

  • @anasalami9112
    @anasalami9112 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    kung fu robot

  • @AlexeyYarotsky
    @AlexeyYarotsky 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    ??????

  • @Fastereus
    @Fastereus 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Delta robot is fastes

  • @a.l.386
    @a.l.386 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    ...🤔?????....!!!