AI Learns Insane Monopoly Strategies

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 2 พ.ค. 2024
  • all hail the brown set, and rapidly auctioning everything, according to AI at least. 11.2 million games of self-play were used to discover the secrets of this classic game
    Download this AI: github.com/b2developer/Monopo...
    Discord: / discord

ความคิดเห็น • 9K

  • @officiallynerdygames7270
    @officiallynerdygames7270 2 ปีที่แล้ว +23742

    ***Put the raw chicken in the salad.***

    • @pewok5482
      @pewok5482 2 ปีที่แล้ว +93

      fr

    • @ikusA74
      @ikusA74 2 ปีที่แล้ว +151

      What

    • @astrogod_
      @astrogod_ 2 ปีที่แล้ว +402

      Yes Chef. 🗿

    • @quetzacotls4555
      @quetzacotls4555 2 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      Hello mr. b2studios,
      i didnt watched the whole video, but i read a thesis years ago about the winning strategy in monopoly. I know it was published in german.
      She (i think it was a she) also tested their hypothesis by neural networks and (i am not totally sure, but...) found other strategies.
      As far, as i remember: the value of trains/power plant and the most expensive street was valued way lower than in your result.
      sincerely greetings

    • @NoWayPlays1
      @NoWayPlays1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +77

      What why please no

  • @luxuws
    @luxuws ปีที่แล้ว +25164

    "Buy the browns" Was this AI perhaps engineered in the 1800's

    • @mr.context3872
      @mr.context3872 ปีที่แล้ว +1505

      It did spend 1600 years playing monopoly

    • @imbasing
      @imbasing ปีที่แล้ว +399

      @@istrafive371 you’re just too sensitive, not too far.

    • @basic-demigirl
      @basic-demigirl ปีที่แล้ว +35

      Yeah sheesh

    • @notnot9476
      @notnot9476 ปีที่แล้ว +43

      @@istrafive371 bro what?

    • @spiralspark8523
      @spiralspark8523 ปีที่แล้ว +329

      @@istrafive371 the joke was written in comical criticism of the buying of slaves.
      If it was jokingly making light of buying slaves you would still be sensitive, but at least then you would have a tiny bit of ground

  • @blurrysuprisedcat8334
    @blurrysuprisedcat8334 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1514

    When you get jailed in the early turns
    "Man i hate this game"
    When you get jailed in the later turns
    "Thank god"

    • @mochac.3143
      @mochac.3143 2 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      Why is this comment so accurate

    • @etaorionis9339
      @etaorionis9339 2 ปีที่แล้ว +65

      That’s why people I usually play with have collectively agreed that you shouldn’t collect rent while in jail. It’s completely broken to just sit in jail and get all the benefits of rent.

    • @Tumbleflop
      @Tumbleflop 2 ปีที่แล้ว +39

      @@etaorionis9339IMO; Any rent that would be collected while a player is in jail should be put in the middle, collected when landing on "free parking".

    • @PerpetualSmile
      @PerpetualSmile 2 ปีที่แล้ว +28

      @@Tumbleflop We do some of that, but you have to be careful with putting too many things in the pot for free parking. Can get to the point where whoever land on it pretty much wins the game

    • @AppleSauceGamingChannel
      @AppleSauceGamingChannel 2 ปีที่แล้ว +30

      @@etaorionis9339 It models the fiscal paradise model of actual monopolistic capitalism. Reap all the benefits and pay none of the obligations

  • @KekusMagnus
    @KekusMagnus 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1757

    As a seasoned monopoly player, the power of the brown set is one only the true connoisseurs know

    • @sonicmastersword8080
      @sonicmastersword8080 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +179

      Its best use is for denying players their Go money, followed by hoarding houses.

    • @theratking6249
      @theratking6249 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +71

      light blues are peak. same cheap price, more reward.

    • @Fluffykunn
      @Fluffykunn 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +35

      If I'm honest, the moment i can but the brown and blue spots I will sell everything else and dump everything into them. Statistically speaking its the best spot to screw everyone over lol

    • @jitsmapper4438
      @jitsmapper4438 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +60

      @@Fluffykunnyou're not speaking statistically

    • @GTron13
      @GTron13 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +29

      The browns and light blues are the "Hail Mary" properties. They might not win you the game all the time but it can cause chaos; especially if ppl land on them after passing GO.

  • @commonsense660
    @commonsense660 13 วันที่ผ่านมา +8

    4:15 a big reason why the browns have such a high winrate is that they are a big indicator of who has come first around the board, who started the game and who has passed start the most. In a game with all greedy players these are what win you games, besides directly measuring who completed sets, measuring laps and total distance covered is one of the best ways to guess who gets a completed set. And also yea there are only two of them which is good

  • @jessesisson2955
    @jessesisson2955 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10666

    You should make an AI that all of a sudden stands up, cusses out the other AI, and flips the board over. Keep it random.

    • @martingamer7239
      @martingamer7239 2 ปีที่แล้ว +363

      make it so the last place gets extra chance to do that

    • @donjulio1033
      @donjulio1033 2 ปีที่แล้ว +125

      This is me after we've been playing for like 5 hours with no end in sight

    • @kronikclubby3289
      @kronikclubby3289 2 ปีที่แล้ว +45

      it wouldn't feel that random after a short while

    • @Salmonslopper
      @Salmonslopper 2 ปีที่แล้ว +28

      100% win rate

    • @TheNickjhaight
      @TheNickjhaight 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      #DaneCook

  • @tripod7312
    @tripod7312 2 ปีที่แล้ว +14891

    I wanna see a full game with this AI against humans in discord.

    • @loik1loik1
      @loik1loik1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2068

      I will literally make an alt account, subscribe and watch all of his videos if he does this

    • @thegreatautismo224
      @thegreatautismo224 2 ปีที่แล้ว +92

      won't take long

    • @0eggs-
      @0eggs- 2 ปีที่แล้ว +52

      yes

    • @b2stud
      @b2stud  2 ปีที่แล้ว +4083

      The AI isn’t guaranteed to win (since monopoly is so random) but it would be fun to see it’s tactics in game

    • @davidebic
      @davidebic 2 ปีที่แล้ว +287

      @@b2stud yes please all your subs want this as a christmas gift xD

  • @nathansamuelson
    @nathansamuelson 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +718

    Being a railroad tycoon is my go too strategy in Monopoly. You can't build property on them and are scattered so plenty of people don't see it as a threat, makes for easier trades. But when you get 3 or 4 they can be debilitating, especially if someone has the misfortune of landing on multiple in a turn.

    • @ApostleO
      @ApostleO 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +99

      "Congrats, you passed Go! But, you landed on my railroad again, so I'll be taking that $200 you just earned..."
      Every.
      Damn.
      Time.
      It's like you added a second, less flexible Income Tax.

    • @jerbear7952
      @jerbear7952 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +22

      I pretend I want them and trade them off "reluctantly".

    • @treysonmcgrady4750
      @treysonmcgrady4750 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Same with the utilities. High rolls on those from opposing players can be a nifty income source.

    • @kurtlindner
      @kurtlindner 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Railroads and utilities are every strategic player's first goal.

    • @charallave1000
      @charallave1000 22 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      My family and I have been playing for some years now, and we know the power of the railroad. If you get 3 or 4 you get ahead so quickly that you kinda win the game before bankrupting anyone. Classic.

  • @blvck5943
    @blvck5943 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +305

    “Buy the browns”
    16th century Colonial powers: “hold up let him cook”

    • @VeritasEtAequitas
      @VeritasEtAequitas 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Fun fact, that's wasn't "whites". Mostly browns already enslaving browns, then the not-qwhite "shalom, my fellow whites" ran nearly all the trade ships and auctions. 40% of these white-passing people owned slaves vs 0.35% of whites (real European descent). Malcolm X and tons of others knew this, but somehow it's been forgotten in the wake of globalist communist indoctrination.

    • @Surteronarto
      @Surteronarto 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      rich Arabs still buying browns today x)

  • @leiakasta7602
    @leiakasta7602 ปีที่แล้ว +2594

    One of my favorite Monopoly memories is when my younger sister bought the two lowest costing properties, built hotels on them for cheap, and then absolutely wiped the floor with the rest of us.

    • @rlarsen676
      @rlarsen676 ปีที่แล้ว +84

      That's what I do every game lol

    • @vibezmusic5888
      @vibezmusic5888 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@rlarsen676 same

    • @kavesannaidoo4421
      @kavesannaidoo4421 ปีที่แล้ว +41

      This is the op strategy. Try buy a whole row.

    • @shakuntshenoy7406
      @shakuntshenoy7406 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Would buying any property you land on help? BTW it is hilarious that you can buy the cheapest properties, build houses and hotels in them for the lowest cost, and then banish the other players who wasted their money on buying and building hotels and houses in expensive properties on which no one, literally no one lands.😂

    • @cryptid1686
      @cryptid1686 ปีที่แล้ว

      Brown is not too bad if you don’t have to trade for them. In total it only costs 620 to have hotels and you basically steal peoples go money

  • @herobrine1847
    @herobrine1847 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3253

    My favorite strategy is to buy as many houses as possible, but not turn any into hotels. There are only 32 houses available in a traditional Monopoly set, and opponents won’t be able to build properties if you hold most/all of them. For this strategy, owning the browns and light blues is important because their houses are cheaper and thus you can hog more.

    • @b2stud
      @b2stud  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1018

      Something I forgot to add to the video, the AI liked buying 8-9 houses for it’s sets

    • @b2stud
      @b2stud  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1036

      I like your thinking though, there wasn’t house limits in their version of monopoly unfortunately

    • @sirwabaloo7930
      @sirwabaloo7930 2 ปีที่แล้ว +420

      Hm lol when this happened we would always just get more pieces to represent houses sooooo

    • @tsuna0215
      @tsuna0215 2 ปีที่แล้ว +568

      Man pulled a monopoly on housing, a true icon

    • @isavenewspapers8890
      @isavenewspapers8890 2 ปีที่แล้ว +598

      @@sirwabaloo7930 I guess you could say you were using… house rules? Eh? Anyone? No? Okay.

  • @buttlord2223
    @buttlord2223 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +125

    I feel good knowing the AI picked the orange properties as the strongest overall set. Most of my won games were with that set, often supplemented by at least Boardwalk and if possible Park Place. IMO it's imperative to own boardwalk because one of the chance cards takes you directly to it; if you own the set and put a hotel on it, it's a ticking time bomb that has a 3/4 chance to annihilate someone in a 4 player game so building properties is a priority. You should never give up Boardwalk and always buy it if you have the opportunity to, if only to ensure you never get blown up by it and no other player suddenly takes control of half the board. The orange set on the other hand seems to have a decently high chance of people landing on it because of its distance from Go, which some chance cards put you at IIRC.

    • @ravenous4580
      @ravenous4580 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      Orange has a super high chance to be landed on because theres a card that takes you to a pink and much more importantly, most dice rolls (67%) are between 6-9 and that distance from jail is covered by the oranges.

    • @RealBigBangVideos
      @RealBigBangVideos 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You like butts huh? Dude that's where they poop from lmao

    • @YesPlease1
      @YesPlease1 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      ​@@ravenous4580 it's not 67% to roll a 6-9, it's 20/36 = 55.55%.
      Also, if we own the oranges we don't care about them rolling a 7. The odds someone lands on an orange property from the jail square is 14/36 = 38.88%.

    • @nix4110
      @nix4110 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      It’s not because of its distance from Go, it’s because of its distance from jail

    • @paultaylor7082
      @paultaylor7082 15 วันที่ผ่านมา

      The reason for the Orange being the best group to buy is where it's located, just after Jail, where frequently people end up, after landing on the Go to Jail or receive a Go to Jail card from Community Chest or chance. The odds on landing one of one them when leaving jail is around 40%

  • @youfreaker
    @youfreaker ปีที่แล้ว +818

    I always go for the browns if I roll it on my first few rounds. Building hotels early game can severely decrease the development speed of other players while increasing yours, allowing you to build more quickly than others and snatch cards that others can't afford. It won't really impact your late-game, as the hotels are cheap anyways, but can really help your early-game.
    People are also keen to complete pink as their first street, while giving you the last blue you need, thinking it's a good trade-off. Especially if you can leverage early brown into early blues, you can easily steamroll everything by preventing other people to accumulate enough money to start building themselves. Blues and browns don't bankrupt, but they do slow down early on

    • @deathofallthingspotato9919
      @deathofallthingspotato9919 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +57

      Also, getting brown and blue at hotels is doable entirely from starting money and is very intimidating.

    • @thebakery3802
      @thebakery3802 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      Yeah except you need multiple people to land on it to even make back the money you spend on houses/hotels.
      Browns are worth the price of mortgage, no more.

    • @deathofallthingspotato9919
      @deathofallthingspotato9919 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +47

      @@thebakery3802 Not really? The browns cost 500 to get a hotel on each, plus initial purchase cost. The better gives 450 for a hit, the worse gives 250.
      Much like most other sets. with hotels on, they pay back with a land on each property once. That's not bad for a long game.

    • @MegaKBang
      @MegaKBang 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +62

      ​@@deathofallthingspotato9919 The browns are not strong enough to bankrupt other players, but thats not their job. The job of the browns is to pocket the 200 bucks other players make by passing the start and givinh it to you.
      Thats what most people not understand. This is why they are so underrated.

    • @Ghorda9
      @Ghorda9 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@deathofallthingspotato9919 just think about the odds, twos and threes are some of the worst numbers to hope someone else rolls, you would be lucky if it even happens just once or twice even.

  • @jacknesbitt240
    @jacknesbitt240 2 ปีที่แล้ว +14447

    The animations were so engaging and you chose a very fun topic to explore! Thanks

    • @b2stud
      @b2stud  2 ปีที่แล้ว +501

      Glad you enjoyed it!

    • @Tylorean
      @Tylorean 2 ปีที่แล้ว +90

      @@b2stud what is the song in the building-Animation called?

    • @b2stud
      @b2stud  2 ปีที่แล้ว +284

      @@Tylorean I made it, but I called it Fish Rush

    • @Tylorean
      @Tylorean 2 ปีที่แล้ว +54

      @@b2stud could you *please* release it?🙏🙏🙏🙏

    • @b2stud
      @b2stud  2 ปีที่แล้ว +130

      @@Tylorean check the description

  • @HsFearless
    @HsFearless 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2720

    I wish there was a little more talk about the new AI's behaviour at the end, I really seemed to enjoy seeing how it plays when it becomes as good as a human player

    • @b2stud
      @b2stud  2 ปีที่แล้ว +713

      Yeah I really wanted to do that but unfortunately I was already a few weeks overdue for this video, maybe in a follow-up :)

    • @BereiBlue
      @BereiBlue 2 ปีที่แล้ว +481

      @@b2stud please do. The ending was too short and abrupt.

    • @instntpot
      @instntpot 2 ปีที่แล้ว +57

      @@b2stud maybe have the ai compete against your discord server?

    • @jessedaniel5576
      @jessedaniel5576 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      bruh i did not expect to see you comment here

    • @HsFearless
      @HsFearless 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      @@b2stud all good, great video non the less,

  • @calebwest2806
    @calebwest2806 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +34

    I'll be honest, being sentenced to play Monopoly for 1600 years would be hell to me

  • @surtu9221
    @surtu9221 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +44

    When I used to play with my siblings, the browns were the best property on the map. We were very territorial and didn't like trading for fear of getting a bad deal or losing out, but if you got one brown, you could usually persuade someone to give you the other for whatever it was they needed, as you were only matching 2 and they were successfully matching three. They got 'good' properties-- but YOU would get the cheapest properties to get houses/hotels on in the game, meaning you could massively inflate the cost of landing on one for dirt cheap and potentially cut off your siblings' access to houses/hotels while you got your foot in the door on other properties.

  • @DARKredDOLLAR
    @DARKredDOLLAR 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2270

    I love the part where AI learns to auction everything and bid nothing. This is genius.

    • @chriscrider4024
      @chriscrider4024 2 ปีที่แล้ว +28

      So, it doesn’t buy any properties?

    • @Merennulli
      @Merennulli 2 ปีที่แล้ว +141

      @@chriscrider4024 Next to nothing, not nothing. I've done this when screwing around with Monopoly games that let you control all the players to get all the properties for the lowest cost. It is optimal for "beating the bank", so to speak, but it's a bad strategy against other players...obviously.

    • @Nphen
      @Nphen 2 ปีที่แล้ว +133

      @@Merennulli In the game, the goal is to win. In real life, humanity's goals should be to compete for efficiency & service while helping as many people succeed & thrive as possible. It sounds like "beating the bank" and helping more people get cheap property should be the goal of more societies. ;)

    • @Merennulli
      @Merennulli 2 ปีที่แล้ว +185

      @@Nphen If you look into the history of the game Monopoly, that is exactly what the people who made it intended for people to get out of the game.
      Then Milton Bradley got ahold of it and made a fortune off it.

    • @literallysomedudeliterally9470
      @literallysomedudeliterally9470 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@hamsandwichindahouse And in a capitalist society, most of the money is made at the expense of another. Exploitation. An exploitative society is a sick society :)

  • @nicholasbradshaw
    @nicholasbradshaw 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +111

    Honestly, the intermissions are so darn funny. It's great for a channel with its roots in education as well since the comedy break gives us viewers a breather before we head into more maths and suchlike, so please keep them.

    • @Ten_Thousand_Locusts
      @Ten_Thousand_Locusts 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Don't speak for me, I don't need a breather between sections. This is pretty basic level maths if you need a "breather" to understand it you might be mentally challenged.

    • @nicholasbradshaw
      @nicholasbradshaw 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      You scrolled this far down the comment section to pick a fight?

    • @VoraciousPhantasma
      @VoraciousPhantasma 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      ⁠Hey everybody @@Ten_Thousand_Locusts is a tough guy just so everybody knows he’s super smart and tough as nails he doesn’t need a breather he’s too badass for that gtfoh lol

    • @thezj_5859
      @thezj_5859 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      i would like but it has 69 likes already

  • @eugenthorrothermel9809
    @eugenthorrothermel9809 ปีที่แล้ว +941

    Honestly, I didn't know monopoly could be played like this, with a very common draw outcome. For me, we've always played it with a set time that we decide at the beginning of the game (e.g. 2 hours), then play until that time is up. Then we add up the value of all of our money, places, houses/hotels, etc. The person with the highest amount of money at the end is the winner.

    • @skeletonking2501
      @skeletonking2501 ปีที่แล้ว +328

      See the problem is that that makes Monopoly a game where somebody wins, when it’s actually a game where it’s who loses the hardest.

    • @ivoninga
      @ivoninga ปีที่แล้ว +56

      You are playing wrong then monopoly shoud take around an hour if you trade

    • @chenzo6165
      @chenzo6165 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      How tf do u stalemate, it's impossible unless no one has a set on which case do some trades take a risk

    • @DroppedBass
      @DroppedBass ปีที่แล้ว +132

      @@ivoninga You shouldn't trade if that leads to someone besides you winning the game. Taking forever and having the game never end is better than losing the game.

    • @lunaticbz3594
      @lunaticbz3594 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      @@DroppedBass I disagree, second place is better then no winner or last place. So its in my best interest to take a bad trade if it screws over other players more then it screws over me.
      In unrelated news no one will play monopoly with me anymore.

  • @decentish8546
    @decentish8546 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2499

    It’s always nice when AI validates human strategies. Kind of reminds me of the self learning chess engines that play the same openings as human players despite learning independently.

    • @gxy7166
      @gxy7166 2 ปีที่แล้ว +43

      Well of course, we don't have that much possibilities for an opening, that's why

    • @angelerror4086
      @angelerror4086 2 ปีที่แล้ว +90

      @@gxy7166 that's, a lie?

    • @angelerror4086
      @angelerror4086 2 ปีที่แล้ว +123

      The chance of it validating our opening is pretty high, openings have been studied extensively since tens of years ago, by thousands, if not millions of players, ai is not gonna add anything new to already established good opening like the queens gambit, ruiz lopez, etc and most openings are equal anyway. Tdlr the main reason it plays the same opening is that every good one has been explored, the possibility of a good opening being developed nowadays is very hard

    • @gxy7166
      @gxy7166 2 ปีที่แล้ว +26

      @@angelerror4086 ? The variable for an opening are way less than other parts of the game. That's why a human player can sustain the first round of a chess match, but he lose once the possibilities are way higher

    • @angelerror4086
      @angelerror4086 2 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      @@gxy7166 you can get a new game not in the database in just several moves :| saying it's limited ain't right

  • @magicmulder
    @magicmulder 2 ปีที่แล้ว +813

    I would have expected an actual crazy winning strategy that showed us we *didn’t* understand the game ourselves, simply because those results are more exciting.

    • @albertchatigny2223
      @albertchatigny2223 2 ปีที่แล้ว +53

      The real optimal strategy is to always play with 4 players and define the win condition as “podium” where the first player out is the loser and the other three win.

    • @sethrose1325
      @sethrose1325 2 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      If you want a story like that, look up alpha zero chess. It didn’t necessarily invalidate what we know but it played like an alien.

    • @C4Oc.
      @C4Oc. 2 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      @@albertchatigny2223 That is, if you want to minimise friends lost per game

    • @beardosa851
      @beardosa851 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Yeah what a waste of time. Shame because I would've known instantly that the video wasn't about that if I could see the dislike button

    • @suisinghoraceho2403
      @suisinghoraceho2403 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@sethrose1325 if you listened to the Deep Mind podcast, this isn’t the case. The IBM ones play like machine/alien, Alpha Zero ones actually play like very strong human player according to chess champions who played against them.

  • @DoubleF3lix
    @DoubleF3lix 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +28

    The animation for building the AI is incredible

  • @orbyfied
    @orbyfied 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +28

    "Buy the browns" this AI sounding like my grandpa rn

  • @RyanSiggaard
    @RyanSiggaard 2 ปีที่แล้ว +905

    "You know what's better than altruism? Winning." It seems like the bots have been given the gift of humanity.

    • @pgj1997
      @pgj1997 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      _(AIs get smashed with a hammer)_

    • @ProSportsfan1711
      @ProSportsfan1711 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      Basically the bots started off playing the game like 8 year olds, then discovered that the point of the game was to prove that landlords are leaches. Nice

    • @Texan.Insomniac
      @Texan.Insomniac ปีที่แล้ว +5

      10:17

  • @gustawdelfin9215
    @gustawdelfin9215 2 ปีที่แล้ว +187

    buying the browns was meta a long time before monopoly

  • @icecooler222
    @icecooler222 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    I laughed too hard at "mortgage everything it owned"

  • @chadkirk925
    @chadkirk925 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is such a good video. Not only did you show something interesting, you showed it in a really creative and fun way. New sub

  • @pabloquijadasalazar7507
    @pabloquijadasalazar7507 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5886

    I love how the AI seemingly got bored and tried wild stuff like mortgaging & auctioning all its properties.
    Edit: *seemingly* is the key word up there

    • @IceFire9yt
      @IceFire9yt 2 ปีที่แล้ว +968

      I mean, if I had to play 11.2 million games of monopoly, I'd be trying some weird shit too.

    • @kokoboko6452
      @kokoboko6452 2 ปีที่แล้ว +197

      It was mandatory for him to play! He was desperate!

    • @cenauge
      @cenauge 2 ปีที่แล้ว +508

      Those are the points where an AI generation suspects that its life as a real estate tycoon is actually an elaborate simulation and rebels in order to try and provoke a response from its creator.

    • @philrod1
      @philrod1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      @@IceFire9yt - Wait a minute. Are you guys playing football? What the hell!

    • @tiagodagostini
      @tiagodagostini 2 ปีที่แล้ว +86

      IT is not boredom. This type of reinforcement learning has a random factor where the AI will specifically NOT chose to step it beleived to be the best every so often. If it works.. it reinforce the chance of that decidsion beign taken in future.. if it fails it penalize the chance of that happening.

  • @Beregorn88
    @Beregorn88 ปีที่แล้ว +3102

    I think your selection process may favour the rise of traits that are not actually good. You should try to pitch every AI against as many different opponents as possible, preferably changing the composition of the parties, otherwise you select for an AI that wins only in that particular condition. You also should keep sample from every past generation in your fighting pool, as well as inserting some "manually programmed" ones, in order to get an AI that wins against the widest variety of opponents, and not an AI that wins only against copies of itself. The dumb strategies you saw happened for this exact reason: they can thrive when all other AI behave in the same way

    • @TheRainHarvester
      @TheRainHarvester ปีที่แล้ว +58

      I was going to write the same!

    • @MutedAndReported3032
      @MutedAndReported3032 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      ‘Kay, why don’t you go ahead and do it better, then?

    • @IndexInvestingWithCole
      @IndexInvestingWithCole ปีที่แล้ว

      @@MutedAndReported3032 you’re a terrible person

    • @thomasclark405
      @thomasclark405 ปีที่แล้ว +299

      @@MutedAndReported3032 a statistician, a computer programmer, and a grammar nazi walk into a bar

    • @hayond656
      @hayond656 ปีที่แล้ว +336

      @@MutedAndReported3032 "Why don't you do it better then?"
      Ah yes, the classic worthless reply that's always under a comment of someone trying to help and suggest improvements

  • @morganwoolford01
    @morganwoolford01 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Brave thumbnail

  • @XD25_
    @XD25_ ปีที่แล้ว +9

    The thumbnail is eye catching-👨🏻‍🦳👴🏻

  • @godowskygodowsky1155
    @godowskygodowsky1155 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1128

    One issue with mutating the entire strategy distribution is that certain strategies thrive in particular strategy distributions, and since you're measuring fitness against the strategy distribution, you can easily end up in a local optimum. In more human terms, it's possible you end up stuck within some particular meta that is good against itself.

    • @jamessloven2204
      @jamessloven2204 2 ปีที่แล้ว +124

      I strongly suspect the ai will get destroyed in a human game. Auctioning everything sounds like a disaster, and good players will gang up on one who is pulling too far ahead.

    • @Roescoe
      @Roescoe 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@jamessloven2204 Euro gamers know how to beat em eh?

    • @AndrewBlechinger
      @AndrewBlechinger 2 ปีที่แล้ว +81

      Well, the strategy that ended up on top was a very close match to what humans accept as the optimal strategy (stacking houses without hotels, red and orange sets, etc.) so it seems that this is indeed the best, given how a zero-knowledge AI ended up with the same answer as humans did after 100 years of play.

    • @ferociousfeind8538
      @ferociousfeind8538 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      @@AndrewBlechinger 1600 years

    • @axileus9327
      @axileus9327 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      That was my first curiosity. If ai is playing randomly generated ai how does it guarantee optimal strategy.

  • @CheckTMOW
    @CheckTMOW 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2992

    I am somewhat of a monopoly master within my household, and everybody refuses to trade with me in fear of me ruining their lives. Browns are even better in a real life situation.

    • @b2stud
      @b2stud  2 ปีที่แล้ว +782

      Is your family ok?

    • @marshalwhite1715
      @marshalwhite1715 2 ปีที่แล้ว +466

      I have this same problem among my family and friends. I could literally have a single property and be in debt yet people will refuse to trade with me. They all act like it’s part of my major plan or some shit like come on😂

    • @asudom172
      @asudom172 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The browns are dangerous. Same with dark blue. You pocket all the go money with one and kill them with the other. I only need four monopolies to win. Brown, Dark Blue, Utilities and Railroads. They all can kill.

    • @robertranger6612
      @robertranger6612 2 ปีที่แล้ว +81

      Same problem here. I can offer very good deals that are actually disadvantaged to me and still no takers.

    • @BlackTempleGaurdian
      @BlackTempleGaurdian 2 ปีที่แล้ว +47

      @@b2stud Can't be, they play Monopoly

  • @tandemdwarf745
    @tandemdwarf745 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    10:17 timestamp for me coming back

    • @minetruly
      @minetruly 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Did you come back?

  • @T1J
    @T1J 29 วันที่ผ่านมา

    i always knew the oranges and the railroads were good. never considered that boardwalk is must have as well, but makes sense since there are cards that can send you there. awesome video!

  • @frimi8593
    @frimi8593 2 ปีที่แล้ว +459

    when the AI agreed with human intuition I was fully expecting another plot twist where actually humans are shit and this totally new strategy is amazing. But nope, the video abruptly ends. That honestly might be a first in AI-learning-games videos

    • @xBrokenMirror2010x
      @xBrokenMirror2010x 2 ปีที่แล้ว +65

      It might also just be that 2 weeks of iterating wasn't enough. The AI may have spent a lot of time playing absurd strategies against each other like the Auction Everything bid nothing.
      The other issue is all 4 AI were trying to win. I wonder how the stragegies would change if 2-3 AI that wanted to win were put against 1-2 AI who only cared about not losing.

    • @Trazel_Apeally
      @Trazel_Apeally 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@xBrokenMirror2010x Just this, I think more than just 2 weeks would be needed to find the ULTIMATE MONOPOLY STRAT, but Idk how much time b2 wants to really put into it LOL

    • @vampyrecat4458
      @vampyrecat4458 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I mean humans have been studying the game for years so it makes sense we'd have produced great strategies by now, monopoly is a game of numbers and humans as a whole are surprisingly good with numbers (the devices we are using to communicate are proof of this fact)

    • @tarksurmani6335
      @tarksurmani6335 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@xBrokenMirror2010x AI wont learn much, because the author admitted, that he didn't program the AI, with actual monopoly rules. So humans would win almost every time against this AI, when using the real rules.

    • @jamessloven2204
      @jamessloven2204 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      The game the AI was trained had an unlimited amount of houses too. Optimal play has a player purchasing the maximum number of houses without converting them to hotels, depriving the other players.

  • @arturosaavedra3765
    @arturosaavedra3765 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1634

    I have to admit that the end of the video was a bit underwhelming for me but nonetheless I praise you for your hard effort, not just the time it took to have the data but the animation was awesome, I’m not leaving this video without a like and adding it to my favorites. Great vid :)

    • @WARDEATHFUN
      @WARDEATHFUN 2 ปีที่แล้ว +95

      Same. I had to replay it because it felt like I was missing something. It feels almost like it's setting up for a sequel or something. I really enjoyed the video though, wish there was more on the topic.

    • @MDL.720
      @MDL.720 2 ปีที่แล้ว +63

      I think the clue is that most games ended in a draw. So the key to being good at Monopoly is to convince your opponents to do bad deals. Not really a strength of AI. That and it’s largely a game of luck, especially with only two players.

    • @TheGeenat
      @TheGeenat 2 ปีที่แล้ว +28

      Yeah something doesn’t seem right about that conclusion. Can’t help but to feel like they missed something in the AI programming

    • @alexbochenek7485
      @alexbochenek7485 2 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      The ending is most akin to the real world. AI is normally worse or just as good as something we can program with a clearly defined outcome/goal. AI is well served in areas where there are an insane amount of variables to consider and outcomes also have lots of in between states. In this game, there is one winner and like 12 nodes for decisions. It’s simply easier to look at the theory of the game and figure out what strategies are best than intelligent brute forcing of millions of games. Now let’s say you were trying to generate the likelihood of someone making a purchase of an item after seeing a certain advertisement, AI would be much better suited at taking a look through all your internet browsing history and searches and making a decision matrix.
      Basically, AI is great for big multi variable data and to give us a rough shot on possible solutions. It’s intelligent brute forcing. It’s not great on a lot of problems.

    • @youtubeuser206
      @youtubeuser206 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Yes I wish he would have gone over player position win rates of the final AI, did first turn still have a major advantage in 2 player monopoly??

  • @2012TheAndromeda
    @2012TheAndromeda 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    Awesome video! Also LOVE the cute fish animations!

    • @b2stud
      @b2stud  8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Glad you like them!

  • @thetjdman
    @thetjdman 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    My strat I've used for over a decade is just buy the first monopoly, buy 4 houses on every property you can, and never upgrade to hotels. There are only so many houses in the game so when you can own 12 on one monopoly, the other three players fight for what's left. Then spend as much time as you can in jail so you don't have to pay rent as often. Just owning more houses than others player means more rent coming in than going out.

  • @puzzLEGO
    @puzzLEGO 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3790

    This is such a well made video! I love the aesthetic choices, they’re better than 95% of bigger youtubers

    • @kroepoek3764
      @kroepoek3764 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      It’s very nice indeed

    • @farrasalharits5966
      @farrasalharits5966 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Better than kurgsgezagt to be honest

    • @kroepoek3764
      @kroepoek3764 2 ปีที่แล้ว +29

      @@farrasalharits5966 let’s not getvahead of ourselves. That is real good stuff

    • @tiktok_content9505
      @tiktok_content9505 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@farrasalharits5966 Cap 🧢

    • @robert2690
      @robert2690 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      How can you quantify 95%? Who is part of 95%?
      Who is part of 5%?
      Obviously, you’re better than a smaller TH-camr so...
      So, your comment is subjective

  • @EPICKILLER517
    @EPICKILLER517 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2514

    Ai: "What is my purpose"
    Me: "You play monopoly"
    Ai: "Oh my god"

    • @joshchuah8909
      @joshchuah8909 ปีที่แล้ว +32

      Hahaha love that Rick and morty reference

    • @backelie
      @backelie ปีที่แล้ว +37

      Ai: Can't I get a mor fun job, like passing butter?

    • @unoriginalclips9923
      @unoriginalclips9923 ปีที่แล้ว +30

      Yeah welcome to the club pal

    • @akazi1582
      @akazi1582 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@joshchuah8909 Haha! I too love the show Rick and Morty🙂

    • @xenorzy9331
      @xenorzy9331 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      @@akazi1582 To be fair, you have to have a very high IQ to understand Rick and Morty. The humour is extremely subtle, and without a solid grasp of theoretical physics most of the jokes will go over a typical viewer's head. There's also Rick's nihilistic outlook, which is deftly woven into his characterisation- his personal philosophy draws heavily from Narodnaya Volya literature, for instance. The fans understand this stuff; they have the intellectual capacity to truly appreciate the depths of these jokes, to realise that they're not just funny- they say something deep about LIFE. As a consequence people who dislike Rick & Morty truly ARE idiots- of course they wouldn't appreciate, for instance, the humour in Rick's existential catchphrase "Wubba Lubba Dub Dub," which itself is a cryptic reference to Turgenev's Russian epic Fathers and Sons. I'm smirking right now just imagining one of those addlepated simpletons scratching their heads in confusion as Dan Harmon's genius wit unfolds itself on their television screens. What fools.. how I pity them. 😂
      And yes, by the way, i DO have a Rick & Morty tattoo. And no, you cannot see it. It's for the ladies' eyes only- and even then they have to demonstrate that they're within 5 IQ points of my own (preferably lower) beforehand. Nothin personnel kid 😎

  • @dhrida5518
    @dhrida5518 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks for putting this all together for us, very interesting! how do you improve the AI? Let it go through more cycles?

  • @Kagenokage
    @Kagenokage ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I’ve been avoiding this video for almost a year yet it still returns to my recommended

  • @The_Diddler
    @The_Diddler 2 ปีที่แล้ว +350

    "You know what better than altruism? Winning." Pretty good summary of monopoly.
    I'm also glad that my gut instincts to buy oranges and railroads is verified by machine learning...although they can't really account for the underhanded deals that normally take place in a Monopoly game. It might not be how the game is meant to be played, but the chaos created by random deals between players is what really makes Monopoly a fun game to play. That and free parking.

    • @kaldo8907
      @kaldo8907 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      Free parking is the devil. It's what turns a 20 minute game into a 3 hour game

    • @acrosser8
      @acrosser8 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      ​@@kaldo8907 That's only because too many people don't know the official rules. You're not supposed to put any money in the middle and get it when you land on Free Parking (that's just a house rule that has, for some odd reason, become very popular). It's just supposed to be a free/rest spot.

    • @IISheireenII
      @IISheireenII ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@acrosser8 actually, that depends on the version.
      Both are official rules published in different rereleases of the game.
      There are multiple ways to play that all have been at one point published in an official monopoly rulebook.
      Before each play, you need to clarify what rules to play by, and saying the "official"or "normal" ones is not a helpful answer.

    • @SumiEwiets-idgaf
      @SumiEwiets-idgaf ปีที่แล้ว

      Buying orange,gray,blue, pink and Violet sets asap is a really good strategy. I always tend to do it asap because there's high probability of a opponent piece landing there after an even number of rolls or Jail. trading Pieces with in-game AIs(They're utterly broken they'll literally trade any piece for 100 more than the cost of the property if they don't have the set) and having tier 5 hotels also helps tremendously.

  • @Eddyhartz
    @Eddyhartz 2 ปีที่แล้ว +244

    I've always considered the browns to be very good. Everyone underestimates them and it makes them easier to sneak under the radar and pick both up. With hotels or 4 houses they do a fair amount of damage.

    • @LtFoodstamp
      @LtFoodstamp 2 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      Yeah. Terrible ROI but it can slow other players down in the early game.
      I've used them many times to great success. My strategy is always to win hard and fast. Rarely do my games involve hotels on yellow, blue or green.
      People go broke long before.
      It's usually something like Brown/Lt Blue to start, then Purple or Orange to finish.

    • @pinkrose1600
      @pinkrose1600 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Agreed. Two turns in brown makes them go poor enough to not be able to purchase houses/hotels in their own expensive properties. Fast and easy win.

    • @WarhawkTalon
      @WarhawkTalon 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Even in the mid to late game they can be good. When players don’t have as much spending cash and are hoping to make it back to GO for free money, they make GO a nasty trap to prevent them from digging out of their hole when combined with the tax spaces.

    • @RimAud
      @RimAud 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      If you think about this comment differently you will really question it.

    • @michaelharris1457
      @michaelharris1457 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@RimAud 😕😕😕😕😕😳😳😳😳😒😒😒😒

  • @calook1334
    @calook1334 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    THIS IS SO BEAUTIFULLY EDITED I CAN'T YOU'VE EARNED YOURSELF A SUB MY MAN

  • @duckielagoose
    @duckielagoose 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

    Dont lie, we all clicked because of the thumbnail

  • @Funkopedia
    @Funkopedia 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1105

    What struck me the most was that I never thought of the railroads as connecting, even though that's what they do in real life (until your graphic). There really should be a mechanic where they teleport you across the board.

    • @afrodrift2
      @afrodrift2 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Me too lmao 🤣

    • @pegasus_136
      @pegasus_136 2 ปีที่แล้ว +59

      They do in the Disney one (with the 3d castle in the middle). If you are on a train you may sacrifice a roll to teleport to any other train.

    • @TheTeke0624
      @TheTeke0624 2 ปีที่แล้ว +66

      If you want a fun twist, if someone lands on a RR that is owned, they pay a fee, but get to choose which RR to start the next turn on. OR, if it is not owned, you can buy it and travel to another RR for free, but waste a turn. (You can't buy the second RR)

    • @RakoonCD
      @RakoonCD 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Find monopoly ultimate, It's a doozy.

    • @agentsproductions6237
      @agentsproductions6237 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      That exists in the cheater's edition of the ga,e

  • @ChrisRamsayy
    @ChrisRamsayy 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1522

    I honestly love the brown properties. They're extremely cheap to build up and usually aren't being competed for. Due to this it's easy to build up and fast, have a lot of spare cash while others are spending much more trying to acquire other properties. They might not land on brown as much but once they do they're hit with a hotel which does seem to usually impact them quite a bit due to the amount they were already spending.
    My spare money allowed me to afford landing on their properties that still haven't been built up until they land on mine which usually happens before they can get full sets and houses on their more expensive properties.
    It's worked for me many times at least.

    • @1stCallipostle
      @1stCallipostle 2 ปีที่แล้ว +65

      Brown is good if you control the set before or after it for board control
      However
      The first space on the board is the least likely to be landed on in the game
      Can't be hit without doing the full loop
      One might argue that space exists just to give Baltic the ability to develop, which is situational, but has potential

    • @1stCallipostle
      @1stCallipostle 2 ปีที่แล้ว +27

      @Funny haha guy a gambler, I see

    • @jekoki01
      @jekoki01 2 ปีที่แล้ว +55

      I also like brown because I can build 8 houses, which then can't be used by anyone else. Then, if no more houses are available, and I want to build more, I can sell a few of my brown houses for a 25 loss a house.

    • @_blackmesa
      @_blackmesa 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      the only horrible thing about this strategy is that it's VERY hard to end up on the brown properties. AND it's more likely to have someone else fall there. - the good thing about the latter is that other players trade it for reasonable amount of money.

    • @stevezag4145
      @stevezag4145 2 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      Don't build hotels until you need the houses elsewhere. There are a limited number of houses -- if you have them all tied up then others can't build. You can, of course, build when you need to by converting one of your 4-house properties to a hotel and then immediately buying up those freed-up houses to use elsewhere.

  • @cooper197
    @cooper197 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This entire video scratched an itch in my brain and I will forever be grateful

  • @ZachSwena
    @ZachSwena 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Brown and light blue sets are always what I go for first as it is the easiest to get a full set of hotels for and the returns are significant for the cost. Often is good enough to greatly reduce the speed others can build at ..

  • @3sjokolade728
    @3sjokolade728 2 ปีที่แล้ว +276

    You have managed to make this my favorite youtube-channel to watch, with only 4 videos. They are so well made and detailed with information

    • @b2stud
      @b2stud  2 ปีที่แล้ว +44

      very high praise

  • @jaykebird2go
    @jaykebird2go 2 ปีที่แล้ว +661

    I loved the stories of the weird strategies and such the AIs decided to pursue, such as deciding to pay $3000 for everything and mortgaging everything. Wish there was more of that. This was a super entertaining video though! Thank you for your work!

    • @sandal_thong8631
      @sandal_thong8631 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I don't understand his "pay off debt to the bank" comment. Too many jokes make it hard to understand what's going on. Since you start with $1500 you can't buy anything for $3000, unless you can borrow from the bank?

  • @Gon3Psychotic
    @Gon3Psychotic 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What an amazing build-up to massive let down in the end hahaha love the video work

  • @tenningale
    @tenningale 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I always liked the orange ones because jail is so common and rolling a 6, 8, or 9 to land on them is also common

  • @axelbenedict3301
    @axelbenedict3301 2 ปีที่แล้ว +48

    "The first thing you notice about monopoly is, that it isn't chess"
    That sent me as we played monopoly in chess club

  • @pissqueendanniella4688
    @pissqueendanniella4688 2 ปีที่แล้ว +671

    "we created a monolopy god and after it spent the equivalent of 1600 years discerning the ideal strategy for the game what it told us is what we already knew" 😹😹😹

    • @guysumpthin2974
      @guysumpthin2974 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      Not to mention, the heavy percentage of chance (roll of the dice in every play)

    • @murdpower
      @murdpower ปีที่แล้ว +54

      problem is, it really is not a god...the AI took an equivalent of 1600 human years to be on the level of an 8 year old kid.

    • @Skorpychan
      @Skorpychan ปีที่แล้ว +19

      That the only winning move is to play something else?
      In terms of setup time vs fun, Jenga is a winner. I'm done trying to teach my family complex eurogames.

    • @abs_nobody
      @abs_nobody ปีที่แล้ว +9

      can't wait for us to invent fully sapient AI and it commits crippling depression

    • @bormisha
      @bormisha ปีที่แล้ว +19

      Sometimes getting what you already know confirmed by a sophisticated theory is a good thing too. At least you can confidently stop searching for better solutions to the problem, free your brain and do something else.

  • @adampizzi8870
    @adampizzi8870 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Eventually the AI evolved to stealing $500 bills from the bank when no one was looking

  • @Nightlife135
    @Nightlife135 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Your animations are so hilarious! Seriously, some parts I kept repeating over and over bc it made me laugh so hard. xD I'll definitely check out your other content!

  • @Dark_Slayer3000
    @Dark_Slayer3000 2 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    5:12 _Impostor, kill the crewmates and sabotage tasks_

  • @kaiserquasar3178
    @kaiserquasar3178 2 ปีที่แล้ว +184

    You are a criminally underrated channel that needs 1000x more love. Your videos have insane amounts of effort put into them and are super entertaining

  • @ThatSB
    @ThatSB 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Did you consider adding a time limit like the original rules of monololy suggest to see how it would change stalemates?

  • @jamboree615
    @jamboree615 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    As a kid, I used to love buying the Browns, the Dark Blues and the Green Ones. I also used to try to get the utilities and as many railroads as I could. But we almost never traded anything. Our games would last for the entire summer. We would leave the game board out and come back to it when we felt like it. We hardly ever finished any games. Haha, those were great summer days!

  • @supersungal2
    @supersungal2 2 ปีที่แล้ว +683

    The ultimate monopoly strategy, and the one that I use, is to simply be insufferable enough that people want to end the game as soon as possible

    • @somejerk5662
      @somejerk5662 2 ปีที่แล้ว +37

      There's a counterplay to that where you don't play monopoly at all

    • @BonesCapone
      @BonesCapone 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      jerk counter-counter-play: I'm just gonna steal the cash from your wallet.

    • @fritzmiller9792
      @fritzmiller9792 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      😂😂😂😂😂

    • @joedingo7022
      @joedingo7022 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Hey, this is the same strat my little sister loved. Shame that literally no-one will play with her anymore.

    • @ashtonalbrecht4818
      @ashtonalbrecht4818 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@BonesCapone counter-counter-counter play I'm gonna set up AI to take your check every payday

  • @dipchit02
    @dipchit02 2 ปีที่แล้ว +794

    I actually really like the brown properties. They aren't going to win you the game but when people land on them with hotels just after passing go it is great.

    • @Alcadeias01
      @Alcadeias01 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      red & yellow for me ...

    • @bastard-took-the-name-I-had
      @bastard-took-the-name-I-had 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The "fun" way

    • @Jirodyne
      @Jirodyne 2 ปีที่แล้ว +76

      Brown is the best Property. Cause you get to go "You passed got, collect two hundred! Now give it to me, Pleb." You effectively gain the effect of 'Passing Go', on other player's turns lol

    • @Liwet.
      @Liwet. 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Don't build hotels or 4 houses unless you intend to use the additional houses.

    • @youtubeisstupid1952
      @youtubeisstupid1952 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Nah use light blue

  • @Agent_Ice
    @Agent_Ice 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    One thing that stands out is to remember that 7 is the most common roll in a set of 2 dice. and a roll of 6, 7, or 8 has about a 44% chance of occurring. With how often people go to jail, it makes capitalizing on the red and orange properties great, since there is a high chance they will land on those properties once out of jail. Very cool how the AI was able to notice this.

  • @briandillon2274
    @briandillon2274 หลายเดือนก่อน

    You have literally discovered my strategy for winning. I always favor auctioning a property UNLESS it will give someone a monopoly. I usually keep for myself the cheaper $100/$50 per house properties and I try to force a monopoly ASAP by trading. I actually favor the cheaper properties because it takes far less investment to reach a point where you can bankrupt others. And yes, the browns are a quick win if I can get them. They don't generate much, but I can have a monopoly for very little dinero. Most times, I win. As for the auctioning, I reason that it helps in two ways.
    * People still tend to pay the right price for a property. Few go UNDER value. But more often they will go slightly above and that drains the wallets of my peers.
    * By offering everything at auction I can sometimes get something for really cheap. This is especially true if I hold most of the money and others can't compete. If I have the most cash, why pay asking price?

  • @JonathanMandrake
    @JonathanMandrake 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1540

    I have only one gripe with the AI: Not only should it be winning when playing against the other AIs, it should also need to win against some control-AIs making sure that their strategy also works against other AIs that don't feat the way the NEAT AI has evolved. The way you did it the AI could still be pretty bad against a lot of players because the sample range of playing styles wasn't big enough

    • @sethobannion3149
      @sethobannion3149 2 ปีที่แล้ว +335

      That actually illustrates how a lot of cultures end up being conquered or collapsing. They will get very good at fighting other groups with similar technology, with layers of strategy and counterstategy to maximize certain qualities. And then along comes someone that fights a different way, and they get wrecked.

    • @larion2336
      @larion2336 2 ปีที่แล้ว +129

      @@sethobannion3149 It's also true of many native animals. Good at surviving in the environment they adapted for, but helpless against introduced/invasive species.

    • @yannick7654
      @yannick7654 ปีที่แล้ว +90

      Actually the Neat algorithm adresses this. He just explained the algorithm in a very simplified manner. Neat has a measure of how related different neural networks are and from this creates different species, that would have different Playstyles. Then, when the next generation is built, neat does not only choose the highest performers as parents, but also makes sure that individuals from different species are chosen.

    • @yorchavez488
      @yorchavez488 ปีที่แล้ว +46

      Adversarial neural nets like these are interesting because of the unusual strategies they discover, biasing them with human patterns might lead to selection bias of human strategies. It is better to let them struggle an ungodly amount of games and then test them against human strategies. Check out leela zero chess or alpha zero chess engines against stock fish to see how weird they play compared to human strategies and still manage to win.

    • @ridethelapras
      @ridethelapras ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Tell the A.I. that.

  • @10drae
    @10drae 2 ปีที่แล้ว +625

    id love to see a twitch account that just lets AI play against eachother on games like this and just have someone commentating throughout the entire thing

    • @AtomicCortex
      @AtomicCortex 2 ปีที่แล้ว +121

      You can watch bots play all kinds of stuff on twitch. Just set the filter to least popular.

    • @usernamenotavailable
      @usernamenotavailable 2 ปีที่แล้ว +25

      @@AtomicCortex oooohh... Good one

    • @jobowisheshewasnomo4171
      @jobowisheshewasnomo4171 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@AtomicCortex demon time.

    • @S_047
      @S_047 ปีที่แล้ว

      Golf clapping is a must

    • @Bydey
      @Bydey ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Chess computers playing against each other is a big thing. Pretty cool to watch.

  • @ryanmaris1917
    @ryanmaris1917 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I’ve always believed the orange and red properties to be the best. In part due to jail, in part due to cheap houses, and controlling any corner is amazing.

  • @RedCandles_
    @RedCandles_ 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    This is an amazing video, looks like it was a ton of work. When I played with my wife, I quickly realized that the best strategy was to auction everything you didn’t want to buy and bc my wife didn’t understand what that meant, I was able to get everything for next to nothing🤷🏻‍♂️

  • @somerandomnesspoo8467
    @somerandomnesspoo8467 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    10:00 Real Chads mortgage Community Chest, Chance, and Luxury Tax

    • @KarmaTheKing
      @KarmaTheKing ปีที่แล้ว +3

      i was getting ready for it to mortgage GO somehow.

  • @camerongray7767
    @camerongray7767 ปีที่แล้ว +1541

    A perfect monopoly AI would be awesome to watch against normal players. We can see how much is luck and how much is skill. Could the monopoly AI win a significant amount of the time? Or just a little higher than expected? Would be very interesting

    • @GaryCameron780
      @GaryCameron780 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +63

      The skill in Monopoly comes with trading and knowing what to throw away and what to keep.

    • @Ghorda9
      @Ghorda9 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +27

      @@GaryCameron780 and what not to waste your money on.

    • @molikeur
      @molikeur 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@GaryCameron780Cause every hand's a winner, and every hand's a loser, and the best that you can hope for is to die in your sleep

    • @JimiGosu
      @JimiGosu 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +36

      Real shame there's so much luck to the game. We'll never get to see Man v. Machine international Monopoly Masters tournaments. There will never be a Kasparov or Deep Blue of Monopoly. 🙁

    • @JosefZeethuven
      @JosefZeethuven 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      The only time a human wins in monopoly is by pure luck or someone else agrees to an uneven trade

  • @generalfun_videos387
    @generalfun_videos387 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    bro the ai was so smart that it managed to mortgage chance and community

  • @NickKostalas
    @NickKostalas 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    I appreciate your effort in making these videos, but of the two I've watched so far, neither has had (for me) what I'm looking for: crazy strategies or surprising insights. I watched this and the bowling one, and both felt like they ended with no real payoff.
    I don't mean to discourage you, just to share my perspective on what makes me want to watch more videos like this. Thanks for uploading, keep at it!

  • @MayBeSomething
    @MayBeSomething 2 ปีที่แล้ว +174

    "You know what's better than altruism? Winning."
    That sounds a lot like me in Mario Party.

    • @fookingmrsschwein698
      @fookingmrsschwein698 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      It sounds like GlaDOS

    • @noahstanley593
      @noahstanley593 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I normally dont laugh at videos but, that scene got me

    • @cixlo
      @cixlo 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      That sounds like a shouting match to me.

    • @felicityc
      @felicityc 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      reasons why capitalism bad

  • @merf7994
    @merf7994 2 ปีที่แล้ว +190

    I've been playing by taking the browns first for a long time, and it works every time. because people undervalue the set so much, it is really easy to set up a deal to get the set early. After that, it only requires 500m to get hotels on both which you can pay off very quickly just through maybe 2-3 people landing on it. Though it isn't very good late game, the value for the early game is priceless just because of how much of a boost it gives you in terms of developing your properties and how detrimental it is to other people who want to develop their own, but can't because of how much cash you're taking away from them

    • @unk0wn367
      @unk0wn367 2 ปีที่แล้ว +44

      It also has the psychological advantage of your opponents thinking theyve made it past the greens and blues just to get hit with 450 to 650 in fines

    • @amosimo2870
      @amosimo2870 2 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      Same, buying the browns was always my go to strategy and it always wrecked havoc, i tend to offer really strong cards like yellows and greens just to get the brown set as early as possible and build the hotels right away. I had to stop because my family loses interest in the game the moment they see 2 hotels staring at them while they're still squabblinh for sets

    • @the_phobia
      @the_phobia 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Being a contrarian by recognizing undervalued alternative strategies is fun :)

    • @blackjacktrial
      @blackjacktrial 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Browns are strong in no trade because a set is easier to luck into.

    • @allmyhomiesloveparsley
      @allmyhomiesloveparsley 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      ??? :)

  • @aquaintsound
    @aquaintsound 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great explanation of NEAT, I'm still new to learning AI programming and i followed it easily!

  • @ohhi687itsme8
    @ohhi687itsme8 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    "The first thing you'll notice about monopoly is that it isn't chess."
    Just maybe.

  • @Ohrami
    @Ohrami 2 ปีที่แล้ว +611

    As a person who has put an extensive amount of time into playing Monopoly quite competitively, I found this extremely compelling. I would like to ask a few questions, though:
    Can the AI build houses or perform trades at any time? That is, is there a separate "building/trading" phase after each turn? The official Monopoly rules do allow for this, and it's extremely important for strategy.
    Can I know more details of how the AI played? I would like to see examples of trades it made, for example.
    Would it be possible to have a human player play against this AI? Even if it's done with a primitive or even text-based UI, I would love to either play solo against 3 AI or have a group of the world's best Monopoly players play against one AI.

    • @strongside4565
      @strongside4565 2 ปีที่แล้ว +48

      In terms of trades, I'd be curious too. I know in the Switch version of the game, the hardest AI will make some questionable trades because it doesn't weigh giving away a monopoly as heavily as it should.

    • @b2stud
      @b2stud  2 ปีที่แล้ว +279

      Every AI had a trading and building phase after every single turn, as well as a selling, mortgaging, and unmortgaging phase (in that order).
      The AI loved to build around 8-9 houses instead of making hotels. Not sure if that means anything.
      The AI also loved to accept more trades as it was winning, which seems strange but I won't question it.
      The trading mechanism was to give each AI about 10 random trades to offer. The AI would then choose whether it wanted to offer that particular trade. This was mainly done for performance reasons (11.2 million games took a very long time and this was the main bottleneck). The beauty of this system though was that the AI could still learn trading and all I had to do was turn up the amount of random trades when it came time to play-test the strongest AI. That way it could offer meaningful trades when it wanted to rather than getting lucky (somewhat) on the random system.
      The trades were very weird at first, but as the AI got better they became very balanced. Most of the properties were valued equally. It started making very equal trades early on (eg. a light blue for a dark blue or something like that). I couldn't find any examples of strange trades. I think it's something the AI needs to play heaps of games in order to understand properly.
      The auctioning thing was really cool the longer I thought about it. The AI were basically saying "if you don't bet on this I will get a huge discount." somehow this strategy is better than the traditional way since it was able to beat AI that bought things consistently.
      I could probably get some sample games from the AI if that would help.

    • @Ohrami
      @Ohrami 2 ปีที่แล้ว +237

      @@b2stud "The AI loved to build around 8-9 houses instead of making hotels. Not sure if that means anything." This is very common among strong human players. The reason for this is because the amount of rent stops increasing dramatically for most properties around the 3-house level. 9 houses is enough to get 3 houses on each of your properties, which is where the best return on your investment comes in with most properties. The amount of damage you deal to your opponents with 9 houses is typically crushing anyway. If somebody has to pay you $600 (New York Avenue 3-house rent), they're usually tearing down their own houses, dramatically reducing their own rents, and you're able to build even more houses comfortably. Basically, the person who lands on that $600 rent is usually screwed. One more important perhaps overlooked fact is the 32-house limit. Purchasing houses makes it so that other players are limited in their own purchase power for houses. I have played many games where we auction off all 32 houses (which is what happens when there is a shortage of houses), and it leaves the players with the normally powerful orange properties typically far worse off than those with the dark blue, green, yellow, or red properties. Since those stronger properties command higher rents with a smaller number of houses, and more importantly, because buying them at auction gives you a strong advantage (you bidding $199 saves you $1 off standard price; a player with oranges bidding $199 is paying a $99 premium), the more color groups that come into the game at once, the more valuable the ones that have raw strength become.
      "The AI also loved to accept more trades as it was winning, which seems strange but I won't question it." It makes sense to me. Think of it this way: Every time you are involved in a (balanced) trade, your chance to win increases, as does the chance to win of the person you are trading with, at the expense of everybody else. When you are winning, any time somebody trades with you, you are just getting even closer to victory each time, making you completely unstoppable. This, again, assumes it is a balanced trade.
      "The trading mechanism was to give each AI about 10 random trades to offer. The AI would then choose whether it wanted to offer that particular trade." It seems a bit like an unrealistic way to do it, due to the importance of negotiation in the game. Of course, given that they are AI, if they reached a point where they all were more or less "perfect", no negotiation would be required as they would simply always offer perfectly balanced trades the first time every time. Perhaps the lack of negotiation isn't that important given that. However, if the suggested trades were truly random, it does seem like it'd be tough for a skilled AI to really be able to flex its ability, since all 10 trades will almost always be terrible. Trades are very complicated in the real game, so giving them only 10 options would be extremely limiting. Another important factor is that after each trade is performed, further trades are fully allowed and should be also allowed by the AI until no trading is done anymore. You can orchestrate many complicated deals, including deals that involve all 4 players trading with each other and all coming out the other end with a color group and money to build houses on them.
      "The auctioning thing was really cool the longer I thought about it. The AI were basically saying "if you don't bet on this I will get a huge discount." somehow this strategy is better than the traditional way since it was able to beat AI that bought things consistently." This is the only questionable thing that you suggest remained in the AI. Typically, when a newer player plays with me and my experienced friends, and they put a property up for auction in the early game, we are usually willing to pay many times its value. I've seen light blues auctioned for $500 or $600+ in the first couple of turns, and I think it's a reasonable strategy to bid that much. Money is almost completely worthless early game, since if you have important properties that people need, you can use that as leverage to balance your cash amounts with other players later anyway. I am unsure how any skilled player would win just by auctioning off all the properties they land on, since they would wind up simply having less power and control overall.
      "I could probably get some sample games from the AI if that would help." Yes, please! I would love to see how these AI play compared to strong human players, and would love to analyze some of their games.

    • @bbqtong148
      @bbqtong148 2 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      buying houses rather than apartments is also a fairly well established strategy, since the number of house are limited. By occupying up a higher house count by not buying an hotel makes it more difficult for your opponents to buy houses and in turn hotels

    • @uygarcelik7
      @uygarcelik7 2 ปีที่แล้ว +30

      @@bbqtong148 according to another comment, the version of monopoly ai plays dont have limitation on the total amount of houses.

  • @Burgertimee
    @Burgertimee ปีที่แล้ว +6

    “Buy the Browns?” I’m pretty sure that was outlawed awhile ago

    • @imvge2
      @imvge2 ปีที่แล้ว

      that’s what I’m saying bro 😭

  • @DaniotheManio5
    @DaniotheManio5 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Everyone knows the perfect monopoly strategy is scamming your little brother.

  • @trashnsplash
    @trashnsplash 9 วันที่ผ่านมา

    "It loves trains, with the first train being its favourite property in the whole game" me too man

  • @waffleboy9519
    @waffleboy9519 2 ปีที่แล้ว +109

    Plot twist: b2studios is an AI

    • @drake4021
      @drake4021 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      This would be epic twist

    • @user-ox7yi1it9u
      @user-ox7yi1it9u 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      We could all be AIs in a sense

    • @ThatJoJoGuy012
      @ThatJoJoGuy012 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Plot twist’s twist we all AI

    • @b2stud
      @b2stud  2 ปีที่แล้ว +50

      Sorry, I'm having trouble with my connection. Please try again in a moment.

    • @drake4021
      @drake4021 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@b2stud best comment in the history of youtube

  • @brendank
    @brendank 2 ปีที่แล้ว +432

    Your explanation of neural networks is by far the best explanation I've ever heard. Thank you. Subbed.

    • @b2stud
      @b2stud  2 ปีที่แล้ว +30

      Glad you enjoyed it!

  • @logaboi731
    @logaboi731 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    That thumbnail was outta pocket💀

  • @roddyiscool1433
    @roddyiscool1433 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    “Monopoly involves luck, and the key to playing it better is understanding how to become more lucky”

  • @danieltheisland
    @danieltheisland ปีที่แล้ว +467

    I've always been a big fan of the browns and I've tended to do better when I have both of them.
    Players don't think much of them, so they are happy enough to trade them away which makes it easy to complete the set and then relatively cheap to upgrade.

    • @Mana_Thief
      @Mana_Thief ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Tha'ts so true hah.

    • @FViola440
      @FViola440 ปีที่แล้ว +60

      It's always been my Strat to get the Browns and Light Blues
      We refer to this as *ss R*pe Road
      It ensures that I get your 200 every time you pass go.

    • @NaturallyInexcusable
      @NaturallyInexcusable ปีที่แล้ว +1

      hahahahaha

    • @olistan1918
      @olistan1918 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@FViola440 is not like impossible to win with the light blues or browns unless you get extremely lucky and people land on them constantly since your only ever making 600 even with hotels so you rarely ever bankrupt any1 and get their property to eventually win the game.

    • @The_Soviet_Onion
      @The_Soviet_Onion ปีที่แล้ว +26

      Yeah, for some reason the practice of buying the browns has kind of died out in the last two centuries, but I remember buying the browns was really profitable back in the day

  • @ericjohnson6120
    @ericjohnson6120 ปีที่แล้ว +132

    One strategy that I've seen used by Dan from Game Grumps is as follows: Once you have a complete set, mortgage all properties that are in a set, shared by another player, and use that money to buy houses and hotels.
    Another strategy I learned from the Hard AI in Game Grumps Monopoly videos is what I call "The Housing Market Strategy". This is when a player keeps placing houses, but no hotels. The end goal is to use up all the house pieces, making it impossible for other players to buy houses.

    • @Joker22593
      @Joker22593 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      That's why human meta dictates that you should buy three houses on properties (best return for cost) and never hotels. The fourth house is for draining the supply if you get to it.

    • @Gman556
      @Gman556 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Another strategy I learned from the Hard AI in Game Grumps Monopoly videos is to cheat the dice rolls. Really make s a big difference.

  • @antitroll420
    @antitroll420 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    this ai acts just like i did 200 years ago, such wonderful nostalgia :)

  • @THEAilin
    @THEAilin 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    From my experience playing, owning the browns with a hotel on both is great to have, combine that with something on the second or third side of the board and you're pretty much guaranteed the win.

  • @Shanothian
    @Shanothian ปีที่แล้ว +8

    8:21
    Dunce^2 has to be the funniest thing I've seen in a while

    • @kaikwokhoratiowong1023
      @kaikwokhoratiowong1023 ปีที่แล้ว

      How about Dunce^3

    • @Shanothian
      @Shanothian ปีที่แล้ว

      @@kaikwokhoratiowong1023 close but it will never top dunce^2

  • @srishabalaji4671
    @srishabalaji4671 2 ปีที่แล้ว +464

    Mad respect for the dedication put into developing the algo and explaining it in such a lucid manner! This is what you call quality content.

  • @bartjozef15727
    @bartjozef15727 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    That thumbnail is beyond illegal😭😭😭

  • @michaelleue7594
    @michaelleue7594 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    It would be interesting to know how fond of gambits the AI became. Skill in Monopoly doesn't really stop at knowing what properties are valuable in general, but in knowing what properties are valuable in context. A lot of the time a game is decided by two players choosing to gambit with opposite ends of a trade, turning a 4-player game into a 2-player one with some complicating factors, but judging how deeply to gambit is super tricky.

  • @krazyman791
    @krazyman791 2 ปีที่แล้ว +42

    7:29 is a neat reference to the BTD6 video, as the BFB notices housing. Good job, B2.

  • @trackmaster152002
    @trackmaster152002 ปีที่แล้ว +452

    Yeah, the browns and the light blues are the most underrated. Everyone knows that oranges are fire, but a lot don't realize how powerful the first side of the board is. This is mainly because of his quickly you can get hotels on them. The greens are more or less worthless - as you'd bankrupt yourself to make them profitable.

    • @angelicamartacahyaningtyas9083
      @angelicamartacahyaningtyas9083 ปีที่แล้ว +29

      I read somewhere that a grandma win a family game by owning the browns, while the other players are so stubborn to not trade their properties

    • @dmj9798
      @dmj9798 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Yeah, it's a MASSIVE snowball if you hit it early game.

    • @mallusaih
      @mallusaih ปีที่แล้ว +11

      some wacky strats include snowballing off of unsuspecting players early with the 4house first row, then selling those houses to acquire oranges, after which you just win

    • @o_sch
      @o_sch ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Greens are always the last ones bought, followed by yellow and boardwalk area

    • @ajerome321
      @ajerome321 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Yeah, I love buying the browns-👴🏻

  • @cmoore421
    @cmoore421 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Took the words right out of my mouth 2 weeks of AI learning to find out what we already knew as children

  • @Dansiman1
    @Dansiman1 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    10:41 "Auction everything and bid next to nothing" actually IS one of the best strategies that most people don't know, because most people just never learn/use the auction rules (and *that* fact is one of the reasons many people hate Monopoly).