āđ„āļĄāđˆāļŠāļēāļĄāļēāļĢāļ–āđ€āļĨāđˆāļ™āļ§āļīāļ”āļĩāđ‚āļ­āļ™āļĩāđ‰
āļ‚āļ­āļ­āļ āļąāļĒāđƒāļ™āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāđ„āļĄāđˆāļŠāļ°āļ”āļ§āļ

Doublelift & Sneaky revisit the Infinite Monkey Theorem & Monty Hall Problem

āđāļŠāļĢāđŒ
āļāļąāļ‡
  • āđ€āļœāļĒāđāļžāļĢāđˆāđ€āļĄāļ·āđˆāļ­ 18 āļĄāļī.āļĒ. 2024
  • 🐒🐒🐒
    LCS Co-Streams with Sneaky, Meteos, 
@doublelift‮ (ft. 
@ShiphturLOL‮)
    LCS 2024
    Summer Split ━ Week 1 Day 2
    Summer Split ━ Day 2
    Match 2: Immortals vs Shopify Rebellion
    Footage from June 16, 2024
    ▾ Main Channel
    / sneakylol
    ▾ Follow Sneaky
    Twitter: / sneaky
    Twitch: / sneakylol
    ▾ Channel Manager & Editor
    / snipinghobo
    #LCS #CoStream #LCSWatchParty

āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļ„āļīāļ”āđ€āļŦāđ‡āļ™ • 20

  • @elephantisland695
    @elephantisland695 āļŦāļĨāļēāļĒāđ€āļ”āļ·āļ­āļ™āļāđˆāļ­āļ™ +49

    When Doublelift is the smartest one in the room you have a serious problem

  • @theodoremosby
    @theodoremosby āļŦāļĨāļēāļĒāđ€āļ”āļ·āļ­āļ™āļāđˆāļ­āļ™ +41

    "You are supposed to be asian, bro"

  • @robertbauerle5592
    @robertbauerle5592 āļŦāļĨāļēāļĒāđ€āļ”āļ·āļ­āļ™āļāđˆāļ­āļ™ +4

    Best way to explain why the chance of picking a correct door in the Montey hall problem is that if you always switch doors, at that point the only possible way you could be wrong is if your original door had the car behind it, meaning it’s a 2/3 chance to win the car.
    If you pick either of the goats, he reveals the second goat, meaning if you switch you’re guaranteed the car. If you pick the car, then if you switch after he shows a goat then you’re guaranteed to get a goat.

  • @samwood4733
    @samwood4733 āļŦāļĨāļēāļĒāđ€āļ”āļ·āļ­āļ™āļāđˆāļ­āļ™ +8

    The monkey would have to be typing randomly and not in a pattern of some kind.

  • @vinh_em
    @vinh_em āļŦāļĨāļēāļĒāđ€āļ”āļ·āļ­āļ™āļāđˆāļ­āļ™ +2

    The Library of Babel was written by infinite typewriter monkeys

  • @speedpoke3019
    @speedpoke3019 āļŦāļĨāļēāļĒāđ€āļ”āļ·āļ­āļ™āļāđˆāļ­āļ™ +3

    Doublelift: "The infinite monkey theorem meme is still MASSIVE..."

  • @mustard9933
    @mustard9933 āļŦāļĨāļēāļĒāđ€āļ”āļ·āļ­āļ™āļāđˆāļ­āļ™ +1

    thank you editor for the nice illustration :)

  • @SharmaForLlama
    @SharmaForLlama āļŦāļĨāļēāļĒāđ€āļ”āļ·āļ­āļ™āļāđˆāļ­āļ™ +23

    nah sneaky is just trolling with not understanding

    • @LLBicho
      @LLBicho āļŦāļĨāļēāļĒāđ€āļ”āļ·āļ­āļ™āļāđˆāļ­āļ™

      i think he is just stupid ngl

    • @nmc400
      @nmc400 āļŦāļĨāļēāļĒāđ€āļ”āļ·āļ­āļ™āļāđˆāļ­āļ™

      Hes right though, the monkey doesnt know the difference between f1 to f12, letters and numbers, symbols and commands theyll press.
      The actual theroem is actually, a dictionary containing every possible combination of letters from a to z infinite amount of times. youll get everything ever written. I think doublelift just confused it.

    • @itzssun
      @itzssun āļŦāļĨāļēāļĒāđ€āļ”āļ·āļ­āļ™āļāđˆāļ­āļ™ +3

      Sneaky is the "1kg of steel is heavier than 1kg of feathers" kinda guy

    • @mr.t1417
      @mr.t1417 āļŦāļĨāļēāļĒāđ€āļ”āļ·āļ­āļ™āļāđˆāļ­āļ™

      @@nmc400 its a typrewriter not a keyboard there is no f1-f12

  • @aR0ttenBANANA
    @aR0ttenBANANA āļŦāļĨāļēāļĒāđ€āļ”āļ·āļ­āļ™āļāđˆāļ­āļ™ +8

    How are they making DL seems reasonable?

  • @SuperRic76
    @SuperRic76 āļŦāļĨāļēāļĒāđ€āļ”āļ·āļ­āļ™āļāđˆāļ­āļ™ +12

    They don't understand infinity lol

    • @Hakushodemon
      @Hakushodemon āļŦāļĨāļēāļĒāđ€āļ”āļ·āļ­āļ™āļāđˆāļ­āļ™ +2

      humans dont understand infinity either. infinite amount of digits between 0 and 1 for example. even if one had enough space in the universe to try and write every digit between 0 and 1, conceptually there would be more numbers to write

    • @deliberation6022
      @deliberation6022 āļŦāļĨāļēāļĒāđ€āļ”āļ·āļ­āļ™āļāđˆāļ­āļ™

      @@Hakushodemon We understand infinity. Ability is not understanding. You named an uncountable infinity. But there's countable infinities. There's also bigger quantities of infinity following the order by the Aleph Numbers (â„ĩ). So you can get smaller infinity/larger infinity > 0. We're pretty clear in our understanding of infinity.

  • @saviorofs0ng
    @saviorofs0ng āļŦāļĨāļēāļĒāđ€āļ”āļ·āļ­āļ™āļāđˆāļ­āļ™ +5

    ok but can we go back to the Balls talks? i miss him.

  • @vashkarpalma8165
    @vashkarpalma8165 āļŦāļĨāļēāļĒāđ€āļ”āļ·āļ­āļ™āļāđˆāļ­āļ™ +2

    If it's not impossible and there are infinite times you can do it, it will happen eventually, maybe it will take 1 min or 1 billion year.

  • @bunnyycou
    @bunnyycou āļŦāļĨāļēāļĒāđ€āļ”āļ·āļ­āļ™āļāđˆāļ­āļ™ +2

    is this theory supposed to be related to IMT performance or is that acronym just a coincidence ðŸĪ”(this is my only context so don't roast me if that is the joke beyond the clip)

  • @Doozy_Titter
    @Doozy_Titter āļŦāļĨāļēāļĒāđ€āļ”āļ·āļ­āļ™āļāđˆāļ­āļ™ +2

    But it can infinitely type gibberish