I've been to Florida multiple times and never used repellant, neither have I had any mosquito problems. The humidity is bad, but there's AC everywhere.
In reference to Matt's comments at 19:00, I guess Noah would be the new Y-chromosome Adam since all men descend from him, but his wife wouldn't be mitochondrial Eve, because the three wives of Noah's sons all have different mothers (I assume).
I'm seriously geeking out about you and Dr. Cargill. I've been a fan of his since college and I think I was one of his very first Patreon supporters. I'm also looking forward to the discussion about how Jesus would vote today. 😂
Most likely, he would not vote at all (electoral abstentionism). As an Apocalyptic Jew, he would consider that the only way things could change for good in this world would be the direct (and imminent) intervention of Yahweh in human affairs. The mere possibility of us humans being capable of fixing our broken world would be inconceivable for him. Besides: had he already developed his messianic consciousness/delirium by the moment the elections were taking place, he would likely storm an important government office/builiding, in the hope that the Twelve Legions of Angels promised by Yahweh in the Book of Zachariah would descend to help him expel the corrupt political class and install the Kingdom of God with him as the Annointed President and Viceroy of Yahweh, lol
I have a hypothesis that there is a teapot floating in space between the orbits of mars and Jupiter. That does not contradict Genesis one or two. I’m not trying to prove anything with it just saying they don’t contradict.
I'm getting this: It's not trying to justify the bible under presupposition. It's seeing the bible as data and finding correlations that support the data or factors that don't contradict it.😂
You missed a oppertunity to come to south Africa in spring we had a snow storm but that is a bait and switch we have mosquitos tstse fly and my favorite venomous snakes that follow frogs into my abode. You welcome anytime covid is worse than maleria and lock jaw so don't fret
I think that, charitably, tasks B and C could be (at least somewhat) separated. You could, I think, theoretically show that something doesn't contradict known facts without showing that it's true (nevermind that this bar is subterranean), but his separating task A from the others seems entirely nonsensical.
I commend you all for refuting Dr. Loke, however, it is a waste of time because all Dr. Loke is saying is the Bible is the perfect word of God, especially the New Testament. If the New Testament says Adam is a real, historical figure, then I believe it. That is his belief. Everything else he says is decoration.
Loke is so dishonest. He seems to be using those three 'tasks' to evade critique - That point doesn't touch Task A so I can ignore it. This point doesn't touch Task B, so I can ignore it. continue ad nauseum.
Andrew Loke responded to this video at his academia edu oage. Just search, '81 Errors in Diablo-Critics’ objections concerning the Historical Adam' and it should come up
@@bengreen171 He responded to their video in the document and the reality is that their response was horrible and ended up making 51 errors that he added to the document. I suggest you read it instead of showing your obvious cognitive biases
@@LogosTheos stop projecting. Loke is a terrible 'philosopher' who lacks academic knowledge of the Bible, history, and science. My original comment stands. But your biases won't let you admit that.
@@bengreen171 Cool. Let me know when you have a response to his actual arguments. Also Loke is a scholar who is more respected than Kipp. If you go to Kipp's academic edu page he only has 1 mention. Loke has 49. Kipp has ons academic book published by Brill Pub (not well known). Loke has 9 published by Cambridge University, T&T Clark, Palgrave, Routledge, etc all which are some of the best scholarly academic publishing presses. I can go on and on about Loke's prestige and credentials but whatever
I think Vishanti's righteous anger at the 'it's not metaphor, it's analogy' claim is well justified. Loke is squirming on the hook but crying that he hasn't been caught. Egregious seems too soft a word for it.
Great to see Dr kipp and Dr Monger guess star on Vishanti's live stream.
She's nice that way.
You should a response to ‘no, Jesus was not a failed prophet.’ By IP
I've been to Florida multiple times and never used repellant, neither have I had any mosquito problems. The humidity is bad, but there's AC everywhere.
Practicing medicine also doesnt mean that you have an MD. People do it illegally on occasion.
In reference to Matt's comments at 19:00, I guess Noah would be the new Y-chromosome Adam since all men descend from him, but his wife wouldn't be mitochondrial Eve, because the three wives of Noah's sons all have different mothers (I assume).
Which sure makes it awkward that Y-chromosome Adam is estimated to be significantly older than Mitochondrial Eve
@@Agryphos Yeah, the whole idea that Genesis is talking about Y-chromosomal Adam and mitochondrial Eve is fundamentally absurd.
I'm seriously geeking out about you and Dr. Cargill. I've been a fan of his since college and I think I was one of his very first Patreon supporters.
I'm also looking forward to the discussion about how Jesus would vote today. 😂
Most likely, he would not vote at all (electoral abstentionism).
As an Apocalyptic Jew, he would consider that the only way things could change for good in this world would be the direct (and imminent) intervention of Yahweh in human affairs. The mere possibility of us humans being capable of fixing our broken world would be inconceivable for him.
Besides: had he already developed his messianic consciousness/delirium by the moment the elections were taking place, he would likely storm an important government office/builiding, in the hope that the Twelve Legions of Angels promised by Yahweh in the Book of Zachariah would descend to help him expel the corrupt political class and install the Kingdom of God with him as the Annointed President and Viceroy of Yahweh, lol
I wanted to thank you but that would be task P. So...
Great job 👍
I have a hypothesis that there is a teapot floating in space between the orbits of mars and Jupiter. That does not contradict Genesis one or two. I’m not trying to prove anything with it just saying they don’t contradict.
Lol IP blocked you? That's hilarious. What a baby.
Dr Matt...just love your haircut.
I'm getting this: It's not trying to justify the bible under presupposition. It's seeing the bible as data and finding correlations that support the data or factors that don't contradict it.😂
1:57:55 -- The girl's name in the Orpheus myth is Euridyce!
You missed a oppertunity to come to south Africa in spring we had a snow storm but that is a bait and switch we have mosquitos tstse fly and my favorite venomous snakes that follow frogs into my abode. You welcome anytime covid is worse than maleria and lock jaw so don't fret
What a nice invitation. Thank you.
@@DrKippDavis it's my pleasure did I mention bot Flys....
I think that, charitably, tasks B and C could be (at least somewhat) separated. You could, I think, theoretically show that something doesn't contradict known facts without showing that it's true (nevermind that this bar is subterranean), but his separating task A from the others seems entirely nonsensical.
Start is roughly 16:00
20:30
I commend you all for refuting Dr. Loke, however, it is a waste of time because all Dr. Loke is saying is the Bible is the perfect word of God, especially the New Testament. If the New Testament says Adam is a real, historical figure, then I believe it.
That is his belief. Everything else he says is decoration.
Do you think Berlinski is a dumb dumb regarding evolution and its problems?
Please help our medical system
I want one of Matt's T-shirts!!!! ❤
Loke is so dishonest.
He seems to be using those three 'tasks' to evade critique -
That point doesn't touch Task A so I can ignore it.
This point doesn't touch Task B, so I can ignore it.
continue ad nauseum.
Andrew Loke responded to this video at his academia edu oage. Just search, '81 Errors in Diablo-Critics’ objections concerning the Historical Adam' and it should come up
@@LogosTheos
Yeah, they went through it. It's terrible.
@@bengreen171 He responded to their video in the document and the reality is that their response was horrible and ended up making 51 errors that he added to the document. I suggest you read it instead of showing your obvious cognitive biases
@@LogosTheos
stop projecting. Loke is a terrible 'philosopher' who lacks academic knowledge of the Bible, history, and science.
My original comment stands. But your biases won't let you admit that.
@@bengreen171 Cool. Let me know when you have a response to his actual arguments. Also Loke is a scholar who is more respected than Kipp. If you go to Kipp's academic edu page he only has 1 mention. Loke has 49. Kipp has ons academic book published by Brill Pub (not well known). Loke has 9 published by Cambridge University, T&T Clark, Palgrave, Routledge, etc all which are some of the best scholarly academic publishing presses. I can go on and on about Loke's prestige and credentials but whatever
I think Vishanti's righteous anger at the 'it's not metaphor, it's analogy' claim is well justified. Loke is squirming on the hook but crying that he hasn't been caught. Egregious seems too soft a word for it.
1:56:49 No! Odyssius used olive oil! He wasn't a Dapper Dan man! No similarity at all!