Genealogist credited with helping identify Golden State Killer speaks
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 24 ส.ค. 2024
- A woman given credit by investigators for helping to identify a suspect in the Golden State Killer/ East Area Rapist case is now speaking out about her role in tracking down the notorious suspect, a former police officer.
![ว้าว!ลุงบีมแบกทองมารับขวัญหลานกันยกบ้าน [cc] แดนแพทตี้ SS2 | EP.49 |](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Osihq1OAs-4/mqdefault.jpg)
Jesus, the interviewer is dense. She makes the whole thing just painful. Pay attention for chrissakes to what your interviewee is saying.
This interviewer sucks....Barbara is BRILLIANT...AMEN TO YOU...
Idk how the interviewee didn’t say “are you listening to a word I’m saying?” She had to repeat herself so many times.
Nice and smart gal, can’t say the same for the interviewer......
This interviewer should quit her job
Resign
The appearance in the wheelchair was a hustle. In case anybody doesn’t know.
The voice he used in the wheelchair was the same voice he was using to make those phone calls back to his victims.
Did he tell you?
Yes, just like the killer in the movie Usual Suspects!
The sheriff's department required that DeAngelo be placed in a wheelchair in case he needed to be removed quickly from the courtroom. It was neither DeAngelo's -- nor his lawyers --' request. If you want to talk about what DeAngelo *did* have control over, consider his limp and his gaping mouth.
i didnt like the interviewer, she is common and has not idea of the field
If she is working for a news company. They need to re think who they use...horrible bad..And hard to watch
It's apparent the person conducting the interview did not have the ability to comprehend what was being explained to her.
Agree.
Right? She’d ask a ?, get what I thought was a pretty straight forward answer, and then ask another similar question even tho the woman had basically just answered what she’s asking.
Most interesting, this lady deserves a medal.
Maurice Upton Her work is likely to have a tremendous effect on closing cases.
@@Richard.Hybels It has already helped US police to solve hundreds of cold cases...
Medal #1 catching the monster #2 putting up with 2nd grade educated interviewer!
I was gonna be snarky and and say how bad the interviewer was but it looks like literally everyone else beat me to it. The station could not have found someone there who had a some experience in genealogical research?
If she listened more and spoke less she would have understood.
I scrolled down to see if anyone was commenting on the person interviewing her. She seems illiterate and you can tell that the person being interviewed was growing frustrate. She asked the same question over and over in the beginning. I feel so bad for her. She just worked her butt off to find a killer and then got interviewed by a complete idiot. Such a shame!
What an incredible job, I would love to have her job. Combine my favorite hobby as a job and get bad guys off the street. I love how humble she is but you can also tell how thrilled she is that they all got it right. Great job, congratulations!
Actually its a great interview because Barbara Rae-Venter (New Zealander) explains the process extremely well.
Its a different topic to understand.
The interviewer is so agonizingly annoying, I wish she would have shut the heck up and allowed the genealogist-profiler to tell her research process without interruption.
Very interesting however, the intervier was incredibly lost! Her questions and comments were so distracting because she clearly was NOT understanding even the most basic explanations provided.
This was insightful & interesting, but god the interviewer was dumb. Painful to watch. Video was also badly produced, weird angle and the interviewer's mic kept picking up sounds from her moving around. The only redeeming quality of this was the genealogist and her amazing work.
Yes
Wow Barbra also has a law degree. Brilliant. Great, great work. Thank you so much.
Maybe get an interviewer who has a grasp of the topic.
The investigor said he was riding his motorcycle going 100 mph the other day so the wheel chair is him faking it for sympathy!
Did the interviewer think she was actually the defendant?
'And, how do you build trees?'
She keep interrupting her. I am with you
Amazing. To think they actually found this guy via a geology website. I was just floored and still am when I think about it. I can def see David Fincher doing this movie. This has got to be a future way to find criminals
An A for the genealogist - D for the interviewer...
Oh my god this interviewer is the WORST!!
The interviewer is asking such ridiculous questions as if she was interviewing for 90 day fiancee
Good work of the genealogist!!! Poor work for the interviewer
This is so fascinating. Thank you to Bruce, Ron and the whole Harrington Family. So amazing.
It would be interesting to look into the interviewers dna
I will never understand how that "monster" could commit so many crimes without being seen. How is it no one saw his car parked in an alley. How could he roam around a community in his car without being noticed?
John Mallernee
This is only my opinion. I personally think there’s more then meets the eye with stuff like this. I believe some of the stuff is totally spiritual.
I totally hear your comment. My opinion is I think something evil was protecting this guy. He might’ve had above average intelligence, he also was athletic. Still the odds of somehow D’Angelo never getting caught amazed me myself. I personally believe that the lord GOD intervened pertaining on how this guy got caught. I can’t explain why sometimes certain evil people never get caught. I still believe the Lord intervened on this case. Here is why I believe that. Somehow this perpetrator (D’Angelo) who is now in his 70s was shown that he couldn’t outsmart everyone (get away with his crimes) Also another incident during this case, Paul Holes as good as he is almost made a very terrible mistake approaching the perpetrator (D’Angelo) for his DNA - which was stopped (Holes decided not to confront D’Angelo) . I totally Believe God intervened on D’Angelo getting caught.
@@c.c.9539 I was going to say the same thing.... no one thinks when they see a cop car to mention it regarding rape/murder...he knew the ins and outs of how to go undetected, reverse detective work etc....not God granting him access!!
@@dartsport1974 lmao have you lost your mind?
The interviewer was off sick so they just grabbed someone from a nail bar to stand-in :)
Either this interviewer wasn’t listening to a word the interviewee was saying, couldn’t comprehend what the woman was saying or had a list of questions she was going to ask even if the answer to her previous question already answered the next question. I commend the interviewee for not getting frustrating with the repetitive questions. It was so painful watching her not understand how that the woman relative, that they found on genmatch, that gave them the family info was related to D’Angelo. 🤦🏻♂️
22:08 "so....I'm a little lost" she can say that again. The woman being interviewed is so bright, and the interviewer is decidedly not. She asked a lot of leading follow-up questions, and she never once got it right. YIKES!
I really like Amber Lee’s interview style. She approaches it like a conversation, rather than just asking a litany of questions, waiting for the person to answer one so the next one can be asked. It being conversational, you get details other interviewers don’t uncover because she asks questions and follow-up questions based on what the person says. I appreciate Amber’s persistence in really wanting to understand all the in’s and out’s of the subject she’s inquiring about. This genealogy, hereditary stuff is complicated and I understand so much more now because of Amber’s approach to it.
I thought it was me regarding the interviewer. So, I paused the video to look at the comments to see if anyone was saying anything about the interviewer, and almost all of the comments were regarding her. She was grasping onto things that weren’t important and the genealogists was always correcting her. The interviewer came across as rude and I felt almost defensive for the genealogist.
This interviewer needs to stop booking for narrative an listen to the scientist.
At end she actually did ok questions. She did a little better
Robert Barry I agree this piling on with the interviewer is ridiculous
Fascinating, but the interviewer was a pain to listen through and constantly interrupting...
Interviewer a few ants short of a picnic. Geeze! Lady get with the interview.
This interviewer is always a little cringe worthy to listen to. She often sounds unprepared and slightly intoxicated/over tired. Her interview with Paul Holes was awful, he indulged her, was professional and polite but his demeanor told another story. Perhaps early retirement and a transition into RealEstate is in her future. Geez!
Paul Holes made that interview good, she just sounded star struck. He can interview better than her I bet lol
thank you brilliant lady
As someone who does a ton of genealogical research, watching this was tortuous. >_
as long as he lives, his goddamn soul couldn't return
Hahahaha!!! Half hour interview asking and saying same things over and over. It could have lasted 10 minutes. An interviewer or a student taking notes from a professor? Seriously, this is not journalism, nor an investigation. Nor you can have so many difficulties in understanding how they tracked him drilling down the GEDmatch db
This interviewer makes it very hard to watch this
I love how fast she corrects the transgender interviewer
This might be the worst interviewer ever
Couldn’t find someone smarter to interpret the interviewee? Dense!
These Reporters ask stupid Questions. "What did u think when u saw him? What was your reaction when u saw him? Literally dumb stuff, total waste of Time
How about giving a NAME to this woman?!? Barbara Rae-Venter
the interviewer is the opposite of not shit
@27:20 * raises index finger * “he wasn’t italian”.... lol no offense
Wow, every comment is about the interviewer. Guess I'll go watch Barbara Rae-Venter elsewhere. Thanks for the heads-up, y'all.
You are right. The interviewer should have been more prepared.
Amber Lee is smoking hot. Wow. It's hot in here.
This last full of personality!! 🙄
Well I didn't need to build DNA trees to know that he had Italian ancestry in his family and I'm not Italian.
De Angelo is a very common Italian last name. And I knew it all along. But These DNA analysts are amazing at getting down to the the actual person..
Never assume anything by a last name. Many people are adopted or have a different father than they think. Source - I’m a genetic genealogist.
@@Seashellsbytheseashore21 And I decided that I'm a magical unicorn pony.
It was never meant to mean anything negative. Everyone knows that psychopaths dont skip race, colour or culture.
There is is tons you can find out by a persons last name.
@@zochbuppet448 i don't really understand the meaning of your comment. i wasn't implying you were being negative, sorry if you took it that way. my point was just because you know someone's last name, you do NOT know if that last name is connected to their DNA. just because he has an Italian last name, doesn't make him Italian automatically. that could be a step father last name, a step grandfather last name, an adopted name, or his mother could have had an affair and claimed the father was her husband. my last name is irish -- but it's not my real last name, it's actually my step grandfathers last name and i'm dutch. so no, there isn't tons you can find out by a persons last name when it comes to DNA. however, there's ton's you can find out like where they live and who they probably are connected to.
this video is an uncut version. get over it. the genealogist gives here tons of details on how she did the research. that's why this is a great interview
The interviewer sounds really obtuse and does not seem to be intellectually on the same level as the lady being interviewed.
Sorry I thought this would be a smart web site, had to unsubscribe. No comment on the interview. But that is one smart, conscious , intelligent good looking woman. I so happy she played a major role in catching that guy.
Glad everyone agrees the interviewer is awful.
I would like to know hat ruse they used to get the woman to give her DNA.
Who was that awful sounding being asking the geneticist questions?! It sounds like a criminal trying to find ways to avoid being caught for something.
22,222 views ? wow >
What kind of interview IS this?? "A woman given credit...." Hey, KTVU, how about YOU give her credit by listing her name! Barbara Rae-Venter. Where's the beginning of this interview? This is fascinating information by Barbara Rae-Venter, but WHO IS THE INTERVIEWER?? Wow! Lots of dumb questions, breathing like she's bored, repetition of uninformed conclusions, and poor language skills-- not a professional interviewer. Not a good listener. Never waste a fabulous interviewee on an interviewer like this!
this trans interviewer thinks he can learn about building DNA trees by interviewing for 1 hour :-D
woow beautiful woman geologist but that woman interviewing her soo awful ahe sound horrible
This is the same journalist that interviewed Paul Holes. Looks like she's still doing the same BS interrupting the source while in mid sentence, correcting them about stuff they did not even say, shuffling papers into the microphone Ect...Ect... looks interesting & I gave her the benefit of doubt but in the 1st 2min she starts interrupting. EERRGGG.....
This method of tracking down the Golden State Killer is almost as terrifying as the Golden State Killer. I hope that there are some serious limitations put on the use of this technology going forward in the future, there are so many ways this could be abused. It strikes me as similar to the issue of increased police surveillance power in response to 9/11. The science is also incredibly easy to understand, this interviewer had such painful questions about how the technology works.
BrianDgreat123 it's only "terrifying" if you have something to hide or if you're a hysterical bitch who believes everything they read on the internet. but you'll be happy to know that this method has since been discontinued because a bunch of cowards like you said so, costing justice and law abiding citizens untold amounts of results and safety. see? the world always finds a way to protect the guilty. you have nothing to worry about.
Are you serious? Have you committed a crime you don't wan't discovered by DNA? I think most people are in favor of truth and justice and have no issues with finding criminals via DNA.
Hey man, don’t leave your dna laying around. Oh wait - that’s impossible to do. Guess that if someone wants your dna they can get it. You’re worried about his privacy rights - he is the one who broke into countless homes and raped and blungeoned people to do death. Wake up
Oy vey
Hey is she doing it? Her a new one
you guys shouldnt be that arrogant about this intervew. be happty that its published here. it gives a lot more information. its a typical basic interview, in order to use later on some sentences for a tv report. this reporter asks about things that - at the time of the interview - no one has real knowledge about. so during the interview such a journalist is asking, trying to understand the things, re-asking. than - in order to have later on some sentences which can be used for report or a movie. its great that they decided to put the whole thing online - so we hear much more about this case. very often suich basic interviews are not published. i really dont like this arrogant attitude about things you just dont know - while sitting bored at home. these intrerviews are the bases of all that knowledge that later on is than well known.
Fuck that keep roasting that dumb bitch lol its well deserved
Interviewer is so annoying!