ไม่สามารถเล่นวิดีโอนี้
ขออภัยในความไม่สะดวก
The Richard Giesbrecht Incident - The Assassination of President John F. Kennedy
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 7 มิ.ย. 2024
- The assassination of John F. Kennedy had a possible Canadian connection in the form of a Winnipeg man's claim that he overheard inside details of the case.
Insurance salesman Richard Giesbrecht was interviewed by the FBI after he told RCMP about a conversation he allegedly heard months after the 35th president of the United States was fatally shot.
On November 22, 1963, Kennedy was slain by an assassin's bullet on a Dallas street. It was the fourth presidential assassination in U.S. history.
About three months later, Giesbrecht claimed he overheard a suspicious conversation between two men in a lounge at the Winnipeg airport.
According to Giesbrecht, the men were discussing inside details of the assassination. One of them appeared to have been wearing false eyebrows, he added.
"I happened to hear these men discussing names like Oswald," he said in a CBC-TV interview in 1968.
Giesbrecht said he noticed a third man was watching him overhearing the conversation and followed him through the airport.
When asked if he believed "something sinister was going on," he replied, "Yes, these men weren't actors preparing a play."
Giesbrecht told the RCMP, and in turn the FBI dispatched an agent to interview him.
He also told a young Winnipeg newspaper reporter named Don Newman, best known these days as a veteran CBC broadcaster.
"Oh, he was absolutely convinced and he was really scared," said Newman, who detailed what he was told in his new memoir, Welcome to the Broadcast.
"To me, this story was the FBI is investigating the Kennedy assassination a couple of months after it happened, and it's happening way up here in cold Winnipeg."
By the time Giesbrecht died in 1990, his story was never fully proven or discredited.
(The assassination of President John F. Kennedy, Dallas, Texas, November 22, 1963)
the Kennedy Assination is one gigantic rabbit hole.....and that's just the way the US government likes it....
i will never forget that day.....one of several sad ones.
Lots of players directly and indirectly....but LBJ answered to one man. His boss was HL Hunt. Look into him, he had plans against the Kennedys starting in 61 and made LBJ in 60 to take the VP spot. Read "Means and Motive" by Curington
Same as MLK, RFK, Malcom X and 9/11.
If you throw out the baby with the bathwater, younwioo never again have the power to elect anyone and you will find that any record of your home ownership, etc. will be gone as well.
Yep. One gigantic rabbit hole. And this guy's "story" is part of it. The whole idea is to have everyone running in a thousand different directions. This is just one of them. Seriously, you'd have to have rocks for brains to believe it.
Oswald did not kill kennedy,...
No, absolutely not.
Failed a paraffin test. Put gun down, went down three stories of stairs to the break room in like 45 seconds and was not out of breath. I think he left the bldg because he knew he was about to be set up.
I doubt that a Oswald shot at anyone. Once I saw a "reliable " witness contradict himself and my efforts to correct the problem rebuffed, I have spent time watching what I can. Oswald was indeed "a Patsy".
@@arcanondrum6543 Most assuredly!!
The gun left behind that he supposedly used is a Joke. Oswald wasn't even in the bldg.
These early videos are priceless.
Wow! I'd forgotten about this man!!! Thanks for sharing!!!
Oswald was innocent but they made him the patsy
James Files
Back hen most people didn't realize that giving any Pertinent Information to the FBI or CIA was equivilent to Tipping Off Mobsters!
Back then?
False eyebrows sounds a lot like David Ferry.
my first thought!!
False eyebrows sounds *exactly* like David Ferry.
Ferrie not Ferry
"A fairy named Ferrie"
The Russians came to a conclusion regarding who was responsible. They said Lbj, the vice president
No, he was necessary but it wasn't his work. Dulles and Cabell already had experience with assassinations in the Eisenhower/Nixon Administration. JFK fired both because they setup the Bay of Pigs (planned during Ike/DICK) to fail and force Kennedy to commit troops, overthrow and pick the next administration.
Charles Cabell's brother Earle was the Mayor of Dallas. Their father was the previous Mayor.
That's who I have thought all along. Especially after reading how he came to "win" the U.S. Senate. POS corrupt politician who would do ANYTHING to get ahead.
Well. It certainly fits a crime motive regarding who had the most to gain
LBJ and Hoover HATED the Kennedy's guts and both were facing huge problems. LBJ was fast coming up on corruption charges in Texas and Hoover was facing being fired. I think between them, they put together the near-perfect plan...have the CIA sub-contract the killing to the Mob. And, the Mob had the best contract killers on the planet..and a Frenc h killer did the job...from the nearby train trestle.
Look up Nixon's mob ties back then
They rule today
RIP JFK.
Exactly. It was a coup and they're still in charge.
My initial reply isn't showing. Yes I agree.
They took over after that.
They are called REPUBLICANS.
@@badmanskill1112They are called REPUBLICANS.
Vince Palamara and HelmerReenberg the goats of JFK content and keeping this man's legacy alive.
Lone Gunman (Bart Kamp) and Our Hidden History also deserve acclaimed mention.
@@MatewanMassacre Absolutely. How could I forget those two as well.
I once asked Palamara, under one of his videos accusing the Secret Service of assassinating Kennedy, one simple question he didn't address: how the heck does anybody safely approach the Secret Service and persuade them to murder their own President. He won me over with his nuanced, evidence-backed, and articulate explanation. Just kidding. In fact, he instantly snapped back with "LONE NUTTERS WILL BE BANNED," made absolutely no attempt to answer or even address the question, immediately blocked me so I couldn't ask it again, started boasting about how he hasn't got time for "lone nutters just here to bother" him, and then went right back to cranking out more videos giving his middle finger to J.D. Tippit's family as he accuses the man without evidence of being a conspirator so long as it suits his "theories," and making more videos slandering Ruth Paine as though he's just gagging to get sued.
Vince Palamara? He's a clown.
@@centralfloridagmrs Explain how and I might be convinced
Thank you so much for uploading all this JFK archival footage! Your videos are invaluable to an amateur JFK assassination researcher like myself.
Don't waste your time with this nonsense.
Read CASE CLOSED and RECLAIMING HISTORY, both prove with EVIDENCE that Oswald could and did it, all by himself.
@@djf750good god
@@hubertsumlin9697 good god what??
You believe in a massive conspiracy that has gone uncovered for 61 years?
djf... OK. everyone is entitled to their own opinion.
@@jimmylieb5225 "opinions" are why this conspiracy nonsense has gotten completely out of hand...try EVIDENCE.
If anyone knows, I would love to find our how Mr. Richard Giesbrecht died in 1990. The interview was in 1968 and he looked to be in his 40's. He lived 22 years after his fateful interview. He could have been in his mid/late 60's - early 70's when he passed. Trust NO one.
There was a distribution of a paper flyer on Capitol Hill on 20th Anniversary of Earth Day that caused a shake up starting in 1990 to circle their wagons and get rid of witnesses.
I've always felt this assassination was linked to my custody battle and death of my uncle, targeting my family as my dad was likely an illegitimate son of Albert Einstein with Anna Hahn, that Einstein and Otto Hahn put future political hopes in, after Einstein and Hahn's niece both emigrated to USA fleeing Nazis in 1920s-30's.
A phone call claiming to be from Canada reported my uncle's car was roled over on side of highway that goes through our local country town between Flint and Port Huron Michigan, the police could never find caller. There was different color car paint on side on my uncle's car and my grandfather didn't want investigation for some reason, my grandfather got custody of me from my dad that was divorcing my mom at that time after I was born August 1963.
The truth is out there........................There is no trust out there.
Because nobody’s going to care or believe anything he’s saying. Even if they do believe it, what can be done? The people that killed Kennedy and Bobby Kennedy and Marilyn Monroe have already been revealed and either you believe it or you don’t. But if you believe it, there’s nothing that can be done. I know who did most of it.
@JorgeDiaz,. At time 8:40 listen again.
@bookofrevelation4924 I knew your uncle. He was a good man, and when he died from a fall from the Empire State Building, the authorities ruled it a suicide. It wasn't, I saw the men in dark suits throw him off. I hope this helps you find the truth.
Maybe it's because I'm simply unable to digest another ounce of information on the subject of the Kennedy assassination, but without some further context, I have no idea what this conversation is about or what he overheard.
Whatever the subject/object is he has described it to a tee!
This guy has been debunked a thousand times. I seem to recall that he confessed to his family on his deathbed that he made it all up to seem important.
@@Frankie5Angels150 You are incorrect...his account has never been dis-proven, nor has it been proven...you might want to check your "facts" prior to spewing absolutely incorrect data...it is not information, it is garbage. Sorry, you got this wrong before your fingers ever touched a keyboard.
I had Ontario plates on my car while retracing much of JFK life in 1968 ..I got to Dallas late evening and parked @ Dealey Plaza ..Walked the area , read the plaques etc. I was the only person there ..Got back into my 57 Chev but was followed in and around Old Dallas for over an hour ..It was very unusual and the car trailing me tried to hang back just enough to try to be unnoticed ..I went North and up at the edge of Dallas I went into a bar ..Was so relieved to actually be greeted by several good men there ...
Why were you followed do you think?
Who knew you were more than just a tourist? Were you an investigator?
Did you see the yellow markers on the curb for the killing zone?
Dallas is a strange place. I went there in 2008 for a training seminar, and we went a couple days early so we could tour around. We spent several hours around Dealey Plaza and the Book Depository taking pictures and getting a lay of the land and where everyone supposedly was that day.
We then left downtown for several hours, taking a bus to the zoo. We came back a few hours later to find a place to eat when we were suddenly stopped by 2 policemen. They wanted to know who we were and what were doing taking so many pictures. We explained we were photographers, in town for a seminar, and were just doing the tourist thing.
That seemed to satisfy them, but my friend asked why they had stopped us in the first place. We were then told that they had been watching us on cameras all day and had to check us out. I've never felt more creeped out in all my life I don't think, to know that big brother had active surveillance on me, even after leaving the area for several hours, to then pick me back up, even after dark.
I don't know if that makes me feel more safe or less safe, but it did open my eyes to the world we live in now.
harlem. excellent. the yellow painted markings just by chance?? at the exact spot.
I read where Clay Shaw and David Ferri were in a Hotel in Canada and were also over heard talking about the Assassination of JFK in 1964.
YOu read that, huh? Where did you read and what were they EXACTLY saying??
Well, the fake Steele Dossier was overheard being discussed in a bar.
Dude, by 1964 everybody was talking about it. It was in all the papers.
@@Frankie5Angels150 I think that you are mistaken
You know that the govt is in involved when nothing gets solved
Not necessarily true! Think of it this way, if the true assassin's were part of an organization or agency outside of the federal govt BUT important to the ability of the average job to trust the govt, then the feds would have all the reason in the world to cover up the truth. Not saying that's the case but I'm just saying that there are many reasons beyond THEY DID IT for the govt to either ignore it or cover it up JS
What rarely gets discussed is the fact that Lee Harvey Oswald's aunt, Marguerite Claverie Oswald's sister, Lillian Claverie Murret was married to Charles "Dutz" Murret who was an associate of La Cosa Nostra Capo Dei Capi of New Orleans Carlos Marcello.
Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy had Marcello picked up at the Immigration Office and flown to Guatamala and dumped in a jungle in 1961!
Marcello's Visa had expired. Marcello had a Guatamalan visa because he had stated that he was a native of Guatamala.
He was actually born in Italy.
It is rumored that David Ferrie flew his Cessna down to Guatamala to pick up Marcello and fly him back to the United States!
This is a definite link between Lee Harvey Oswald and La Cosa Nostra.
@@RaulMacias-gv3le ok, so now show evidence, not motives, not coincidence, not hearsay of a conspiracy. Good luck, might take you a while since none exists
@@djf750 If you think I'm going to produce a document explaining the whole set up and who was involved, you're dreaming pal!
That's absurd!
The fact is, President Kennedy and his brother Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy were on a crusade on ridding La Cosa Nostra from the American scene, so you must start with who profited.
@@RaulMacias-gv3letouche!
Oswald lived with his uncle murret through out his life. Murret was the first person lee saw when he came back from Russia. You need to look into Santos trafficante Jr , Sam giancana and Meyer lansky, Carlos Marcello they are all connected. Just Google there names with the CIA . It's just the facts G-men believers.
@@djf750 He has given you the facts. If you need to, you can do your own research. The sources are at your fingertips, DJF.
its a good thing he did not work at the little rock air port as the atf would have shot him
This story appears very valid. Why and how would you fake this? Ferry was the kind of guy who would be foolish enough to talk about this in the wrong place. The highly skilled thugs always cover their bases. Not Ferry. Nevertheless, when the word " paper " came up it signified that they were in a lucrative business sponsored by a lucrative benefactor.
Why is it conspiracy theorists always find crackpot rubbish like this "very valid" while consistently and summarily dismissing all the evidence in the case as "fake?"
Ferry, who died of Berry aneurysm after failing health, hotly and consistently denied any knowledge of the assassination and was preparing to sue Jim Garrison for harassment.
@baronvonnemblesI could easily say Oswald is a lie too,🤷
So, you knew David Ferrie personally did you?
@@Frankie5Angels150 Reminds me of the conspiracy theorists who dismiss Robert Oswald's views on Lee Harvey Oswald's guilt on grounds he hadn't seen much of him in a long time.... basically they lecture Oswald's own brother didn't know him as well as they do. lol
This is a whole lot of nothing
Agreed
Right. I was expecting some kind of special revelation. It was a waste of time.
Nothing of substance here. We know the mob and CIA and other government operatives were all involved. The orders came from the fat cats and the alley cats did the deed.
This is so poignant.
Earlier this year I was sitting at a downtown cafe during the early afternoon (it was either a Tuesday or a Wednesday) and I heard an old man quietly discussing some matters with a person who looked like a priest (a vicar).
I heard the guy who looked like a priest mention the last rites and last confession. I also heard the old man mention details very similar to what this man (Richard) said during this interview.
He'd mentioned all of these names. That same old man I heard passed away last month (according to a next door neighbor).
To me, based on what I now think I know, I'm almost sure that this guy must have been right.
It's like I was meant to come across this video today.
troll alert
"Same man seen with James Earl Ray previously..." Murder, Inc is alive and well, and international.
What exactly did he overhear?
This -> 4:36
@@arcanondrum6543 he overheard the names "Harold Issacs" and "Cliff Hoffman". CLASSIFIED
What he read in the newspapers.
Romanyk??
All you need to do is read Double Cross by Sam Giancana and he’s as close to reality as you will ever get. It’s actually written by Chuck his grandson.
Not sure who killed Tippet but it sure wasn't Oswald
NoTrueFlags Here
Also very interesting content. I am sure he has been hassled quite a bit for some of his more seemingly extreme views on the JFK assassination. However. no one researcher's evidence is infallible, and nothing is beyond the realm of possibility in this case.
Please make a video on this !
@@user-yx2tb3sy2z @NoTrueFlags Here
is the TH-cam channel I am referring to. It is not my channel. It came up in my feed last Fall 2023.
Nice to hear New information 🇺🇸🤔
What information. He said nothing.
Giesbrecht, who had a minor criminal record of an arrest for “break, enter, and
theft” in 1951 and a conviction for assault in 1954, was described by the manager
of a TV station in North Dakota, to whom Giesbrecht persistently tried to peddle
his "story," as a “beer-drinking type, childlike, and one who felt he could possibly
obtain some money from his story.” Even a certifiable loon like Garrison (who'd believe mostly anything) did not call poor Richard to the stand at Shaw’s trial, obviously feeling he would hurt the prosecution’s case with his nonsense. In fact, Garrison was so contemptuous of Giesbrecht’s tale that he didn’t devote one single sentence or word to him in his book _On the Trail of the Assassins_ -and he is very seldom mentioned in other conspiracy books.
For context, James Earle Ray was convicted of Dr. King's murder. He took an Alford Plea, which is not an admittance of guilt, but under the circumstances (the state's case), a defendant like Ray can admit no guilt but take a plea. His lawyer, who was a well-known mafia lawyer, advised him to do so otherwise he would get the death penalty. Ray was under the impression that he would be convicted for conspiracy not murder. When his sentence was handed down, Ray immediately withdrew his
plea and protested his innocence, of murdering Dr. King.
After Ray escaped the prison, he became acquainted with a person named Raoul. Ray described this person as a middleman, for a more inportant criminal, or part of a criminal organization. Ray and his new buddy, Raoul toured the US, performing questionable activities. Raoul would instruct Ray to stay in a certain place for a time, give him money, order him to purchase specific items, and send him elsewhere when needed. Ray claims this man promised to get him out of the US, intimating Canada as the last stop. Ray claims he was desperate and would do anything not to go back to prison. This was Ray's first successful prison escape, and he did not want to jeopardise it.
During the private investigation of Dr. King's former lawyer and presidential campaign staffer (yes, Dr. King ran for the office of the president of the United States), Dr. William Pepper discovered that during the search for Ray, after Dr. King was murdered, the car he fled Memphis in was located in Dallas, TX. A young officer discovered the vehicle abandoned in a parking lot. It matched the description of the suspect's [Ray] car. When the officer opened the car, before his superiors arrived, he found a lot of nicknacks familiar to any glove compartment. He then discovered a matchbook. The Carousel Club and several other things that shocked him were written inside. This was five years after JFK's murder, and everyone in their mother knew of Jack Ruby and his club. The matchbook also had phone numbers associated with the club.
The young officer knew what he was holding was very important and sensitive. He knew that the majority of Southern law enforcement, local and federal, were not friends with the Kennedys or the civil rights movement, so he kept the matchbook on his person. He would later inform Dr. Pepper of his discovery.
What Giesbrecht nor Lane knew at the time was that Raoul, Ray, and the matchbook showed a coordinated conspiracy of not one assassination but multiple murders carried out by the same people.
Dorothy Kilgallen
Off hand it is difficult to connect the 2 assassinations. If that were the case these should have been nuch easier to solve. Ray was not known to be the most skilled assassin in the world.
Ray was another patsy.
You’re assuming certain groups want these cases solved.
Ray did not kill MLK they faked his shooting. Ray and MLK was even related.So the same people (CIA) can been involved in both events and it is for sure very possible coz they use the same group of people for false flag and killings . Men with no name.
The sketch was Bush senior !
There was an "oilman from texas" apprehended and let go. There was a mob that began stoning the police screaming at them why are you letting that man go. Literally the only time I have ever heard of a stoning incident in the U.S.
To the creator of this channel you might want to go in and edit your description box. At the bottom of your description information you duplicate it the last two paragraphs twice so you might want to take out the extra duplication.
Liars don't use the word, "Golly."
Sickening.
What year was this interview please?
1968.
Excellent thread 🧵 Thank you
Maybe i misunderstood it but he said he started listening more intently because was surprised people would be involved with a man like Oswald, though he had no idea who that was at the time.
It was said said in a joking way " Son today is not your lucky day for you are going to the morgue and I am going back to the white house "
The dude said literally nothing about anything. Canadians.
No brows, or false ones? Would that be David Ferrie?
The undeniable evidence of a second shooter is obvious in the Muchmore film. Watch Emmett Hudson and the 2 other men on the concrete steps. Their reaction says it all. They immediately react to the headshot. Question? Why didn't they react to shots 1 and 2 in the same manner. Duh, because shots 1 and 2 came from another location and the headshot came from behind them. Game, set, and match - mic drop- turn out the lights the lone nutters are over - thank you very much.
Gee thanks. Boy, that was easy.
@@victoralvarez-tapia9740 Thanks-
What they do is try and use science to disprove that. Physics, Geometry, Optics. And then tell us that it is an illusion both audibly and visually.
Agree even the Zapruder film clearly shows last 2 shots JFK body movements prove it was more then 1 shooter.
In that case we look forward to you now of course explaining away all of the following:
a) All bullets and fragments ever found were matched to Oswald's rifle.
b) Victims' reactions in Zapruder's film clearly demonstrate they are hit by the same bullet, and ergo, from behind.
c) Within 1-2 frames of Kennedy being hit, Connally's lapel pops out, his shoulder is driven down, his hat flips up and his expression violently contorts as his lung is collapsed, demonstrating one bullet, and from behind.
d) Connally was demonstrably seated lower, inboard and turned sharply to his right.
e) Victims' wounds demonstrably line up on a trajectory and track straight back to the sixth floor window.
f) View of the entry wound on Connally's back would demonstrably have been blocked by Kennedy's body, ergo the same bullet has to have gone through both of them.
g) Bullet recovered from the stretcher is badly crushed at the nose and flattened down one side, consistent with going through Kennedy without hitting bone, slowing and tumbling on leaving him, as it would have done, and then broadsiding its way through Connally's ribs, as medical and forensic evidence clearly demonstrate.
h) That bullet was also matched to Oswald's rifle.
i) Nobody planting a bogus bullet at the hospital within one hour of the shooting could possibly have known a bullet needed planting at all or that he wasn't simply planting one bullet too many into evidence and blowing the whole plot.
j) Kennedy is very clearly seen in Zapruder's film to suffer a massive exit wound exploding at the right temple and absolutely nothing happening at the back of the head, both consistent only with a shot from behind.
k) Witnesses directly under the sixth floor window firmly said the shots all came from directly overhead.
l) Those witnesses had a clear view behind the knoll fence and would plainly have seen any gunman there.
m) Zapruder's secretary was only yards away from the fence and heard and saw nobody there.
n) Connally's said the shots all came from behind.
o) Autopsy shows the shots came from behind.
p) Parkland doctors examined the autopsy photos on NOVA in 1988 and had no particular problem with them.
q) It's utterly implausible anybody would ever assume they would frame this on a lone shooter while firing from multiple directions with different guns and bullets.
This guy does not sound like a credible witness. His body language and how he continually is hiding the ball tells me he is not credible. But the sketch of the mystery man which he held up: that's none other than Conan O'Brien.
DOH! I KNEW IT!
You are trying to be funny, right?
Remind me, who was James Earl Ray supposedly waiting for?
He met in Montreal a spook who set him up with id's and money(Ray's story) which had confirmation by an investigative journalist and other agents who confirmed simply there was an agent with that codename. His name eludes me though .....
Raoul
Yes Raoul
We learn nothing hear about the actual conversation this guy says he overheard. What did he hear? If the disreputable Garrison used this “evidence “ in the trial, it doesn’t seem to have convinced anyone. Also, is it not exceedingly odd that actual conspirators involved in the assassinations of both JFK and MLK, the two highest-profile American crimes of the 20th century, would have been discussing details of the conspiracy in a public place, within earshot of at least one man who was literally taking notes as they spoke? Seriously, we are expected to believe that this could ever have happened?
I have watched the video, which looks like what is left on the floor after edits were made of a Dragnet episode with Jack Webb, a couple of times and haven't any idea what it is about.
Jim Garrison was on to them. The Feds sent him witnesses who told Garrisona lot of stuff. When they got on the stand , they told other accounts, making Garrison seem like a fool. The jury could not take anything presented seriously. If the Feds want you, or want to sabatofe you, that is it.
I am calling bullshit.
GREAT book: JFK: The Dead Witnesses by Craig Roberts
Not one speck of evidence of anyone else other than Oswald being involved. 60+ years and no one has come up with anything.
@@rawbacon 100% True, Oswald and Oswald alone
Did he say, "Winnipeg Free Press"?
My how times have changed.
Yes the The Mob finally got my Father in 89 .USMC patsy Back up TX,🥃Fathers Day ! Miss you pops ! Vietnam 🇻🇳
Why did they want him?
@@smilanesi98 when you work Big Oil No Telling!!!DFW
You know the video is over the target when TH-cam has the Wikipedia link to disinformation.
The Man in the Sketch looks to Me a lot like Charles Harrelson.
Just tell us everything!!!!
Was this man also one they took out for talking?
Maybe but he died in 1990
He said a lot without saying anything at all. Clearly afraid for his life.
Quasimodo predicted all of this.
His face rings a bell, but he stole his ideas from Nostradamus.
No It was Nostrildamnus
@@Magnetron33 He knows, you know!
And you report it to the very people who instigated the whole thing !
My thoughts exactly.
@@knightwatchman I can't help but think about a certain movie that came out several years ago when an old man make the remark that " I still have the shovel ! " Of course that was just a movie , but it sure sounds like a lot of us think along the same line !.
That sketch looks like the first of the three tramps.
FBLie way back in the day. Some things have never changed.
The Zapruder film shows the driver of the limo turning and pointing a white object with his left hand over his right shoulder at President Kennedy. After this, you see the headshot.
Sounds like a story....
Eisenhauer told us what was up. He was the last “legitimate” president.
Fake eyebrows. David Ferrie
Yikes
Blah blah blah blah blah.
So the question asked was why are you still alive?
What the hell? So he's lying because he is still alive?
This is new to me just now so I am not sure of the story but I will do further research
The Reporter asking the "questions" did seem to be a jerk. If it did not say "Winnipeg" (Canada) I would have thought it was a U.S. side of the border reporter. Seems that reporter guy was hoping the "witness" would be killed or "disappeared" so that the Reporter guy could have a "juicy" story for the 10 P.M. News.
_Hit List: An In-Depth Investigation into the Mysterious Deaths of Witnesses to the JFK Assassination_ by David Wayne and Richard Belzer 8:40
The Murry Wilson Incident.
Drawing looked like Brezinski ,
That dude in the drawing is G. Bush Sr.
Sounds like a set up.
So who killed JFK?
U.S. Intel deploying "Operation CYA".
Uh oh... TH-cam is forcing the Wikipedia definition on us.
Whoa!!!! I just figured something else out - this guy is the Zodiac Killer!!!!
M-Street Mafia /Dallas TX
Quien se benefició de su asesinato?
Lyndon Baines Johnson
7:43
looks like a false flag .
Explain ?
Notification
looks like a troll .
@@JorgeDiaz-ly5qp Lol BINGO!
Not to mention, he apparently doesn't know what a 'false flag' is.
@@MatewanMassacre LOL - I also thought the spaced period & lower-case 1st word were nice replicated touches.
America we can do anything where the United States of America. Damn It. 72 years 1952 ? We're like the Energizer 🐰 bunny. Greatest Satan of all time Got it 😀
Was Mark David Chapman also there?
?
Another little golden book story. BS.
Please listen to Rob Reiner’s podcast on the JFK assassination.
This seems a common theme. Obvious cover up.
How short he lived after this.
How long did he live after telling a worthless nonsensical story? 20 years after this recording, they really rushed out to silence him.
@@rawbaconHe was a plant .Obviously.
so, as per the testimony of oswald's mistress, judith vary baker, she talked to lee the night prior to the event about how to stop it, so he knew what was coming. you may ask the question why didn't oswald simply rush the motorcade yelling "get down mr. president" or something to that effect. well he certainly would have been shot by a sniper who would be declared a hero for stopping the lunatic, and they of course would have planted a gun on oswald. additionally, there is information that the FBI was monitoring the last phone-calls of oswald...why if he was not known to any of the intel communities? also, jack ruby was contacting the FBI for weeks prior in an attempt to get out of his assignment which he knew would be the end of his life as he knew it. lastly, was that really oswald in the doorway as the motorcade drove by, or was it william nolan lovelady (wow...what a name) who went from working with oswald in the TSBD then to less than a year later moving to denver and starting his own trucking company, to which he himself would soon die at the age of 41 from a first and final heart-attack. hey, juss sayin....
The man in the sketch is obviously Chris Pratt, aka Starlord. This conspiracy runs deeper than we could possibly imagine. Marvel Comics, which came into existence in the same year that JFK was inaugurated, was headed by Stan Lee (Oswald) father of LHO. I cannot comment further, the Men in Black are parked in my driveway. All I can say is mmhhgggh…
If this man hadn't come forward he would have been killed.
The first mention of the Garrison Investigation, and I cut this video short!! An incredible fallacy!
hes lying could see right threw him
Wow! You're Superman with Xray vision😅😅😅😅
wow!! really??
LOL Garrison was a criminal.
I bow to your great knowledge. 😂😂😂
Sketch looks very much like "David Atlee Phillips"
Just more BS
is BS your initials??