November 22nd and The Warren Report
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 5 ม.ค. 2010
- 1964 ARC Identifier 50248 / Local Identifier 306.3914. This Columbia Broadcasting System (CBS) special news report features Walter Cronkite and Dan Rather as they presented taped interviews with individuals associated with the investigation into the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, along with the Warren Commission report findings that had just that day been released. Interviews include eyewitness accounts of the shooting, as well as taped interviews with Lee Harvey Oswald's wife, mother, and best friend. U.S. Information Agency. (1982 - 10/01/1999) Made possible by a donation from Martin Lucas
If there wasn't a cover up, they wouldn't have sealed the docs for 75 years or destroyed the autopsy notes or failed to record any of the interviews with Oswald. If you don't realise this by now, there's no help.
you know that when this happened, the Dallas police didn't actually own a tape recorder? Or that warren wanted to change archives policy just to forestall loony conspiracy theories. However, sealing was standard policy for everyhing. "The unpublished portion of those records was initially sealed for 75 years (to 2039) under a general National Archives policy that applied to all federal investigations by the executive branch of government,[18] a period "intended to serve as protection for innocent persons who could otherwise be damaged because of their relationship with participants in the case.”[19] The 75-year rule no longer exists, supplanted by the Freedom of Information Act of 1966 and the JFK Records Act of 1992. By 1992, 98 percent of the Warren Commission records had been released to the public.[20] Six years later, at the conclusion of the Assassination Records Review Board's work, all Warren Commission records, except those records that contained tax return information, were available to the public with redactions.[21] The remaining Kennedy assassination related documents are scheduled to be released to the public by October 26, 2017,[22] twenty-five years after the passage of the JFK Records Act". or that all the x-rays and photos etc. taken at the autopsy still exist and nobody has ever refuted them?
@@andrelebaron 🤣 Wrong! They have been thoroughly refuted. Anyone who believes anything CBS produces on this subject works for the CIA.
But help is on the way....it's up to you whether you believe or not...
This world of desception will fall....trust me....
It's not logical to allow fools and liars and psychopaths to control media's...
@@saskoilersfan You`re a funny kid, please write more!
Agreed. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure that out.
I was a senior in high school on November 22,1963. I stayed home from school that day. My mother came home from work early crying. She immediately turned the television on and I heard the official announcement from Walter Cronkite. When he said the President was dead I was numb.
Interesting. What school did you go to?
The world changed that day. He was at war with the military industrial complex that Eisenhower warned about and they won.
What high school in Dallas? Most of the schools in Oakcliff let out early that day with everything going on
Which president was he talking about??
@@TELEVISIONARCHIVES I went to a high school in Maine
Thank you for putting this program on TH-cam. People like you are keeping this part of history alive in the public conscious
I would have thought that LHO was the type of person that would gleefully admit to killing Kennedy,
And not deny shooting anyone ?
Just a passing thought
Every propaganda video previously made will have to be burned until every bit of info is released
@@johnwilliams-ih3pvwhy? You know the result would've been the death penalty, right?
@@johnwilliams-ih3pv If Oswald wanted to claim he shot President Kennedy,he would have and Not kept denying it. What you stated is quite a realistic,logical statement.I agree with it.
@@franclin0 No,there was Not sufficient physical evidence to charge and convict Oswald.Oswald did Not shoot anyone .
Bottom line is 60 years later and the assassination is still classified. Enough said.
national security and all
Interesting to see how many HSCA interviews with CIA agents and officials that are still classified and hidden from the public.
@@PANCHOVILLAMATO Yup. Anybody that still defends The Warren Commission is nobody you need to hear from.
Johnny roselli and sam giancana got chainsaw to death before they could testify at the house select committee on assassinations
Chainsaw massacre for Johnny roselli and SAM GIANCANA
And they are still lying to us on a daily basis
@ James Malcom Watch U.S.S. Liberty on Real News Network. Unarmed U.S. Spy ship
attacked in 1967. 34 U.S. dead & 171 wounded. It's like part 2. Cover up continues by both parties & govt. What would JFK do? Iran/Contra/ Israel. The Finders/ Franklin &
Epstein scandals from 70 ' s till now. Watch Nick Bryant show anout Franklin
Savings & Loan & sex w/ kids. Epstein is the tip of iceberg. All protected by govt.
Fucking losers.
Hourly. ;)
People lie to themselves on a daily basis
No justice no peace…
A German Mauser 7.65 overnight turned into a Italian Manlicher Carcano 6.5 cal.
Exit wounds became entrance wounds.............
The 2 types of bullets found in mr Tippet couldn't be fired from Oswalds revolver.
3 Expert Marksman couldn''t get 3 shots of in the time the shots were fired, further more none of them was able to hit the head of a stationary target.
Note: Oswald's scope was also mis aligned.
Why the commision never saw the authopsie pictures? And why 15 doctors from Parkland all said that the president had an exit wound at the back of his head?
One glaring anomaly after another, yet the debunkers will argue till they're blue in the face.
A) No Mauser was found, cops freely owned up to misidentifying the rifle, big deal.
B) Parkland doctors were speculating wildly about the wounds.
C) Oswald was using two types of ammo in the revolver and nearly a dozen witnesses ID'd him as the man who shot Tippit and fled
D) Shooting was successfully recreated by investigators using Oswald' rifle and 3 shots over 8-9 seconds at a slow-moving target a maximum of 88 yards off is hardly a superhuman feat, inf act it's child's play for a trained Marine
E) Parkland doctors looked at the autopsy photos and had no particular problem with them.
@@aaronz7056 looks like you're still at it. JTRIG troll/ mockingbird media mouthpiece, How's that working for ya?
Makin any progress with your trolling tactics? I didn't think so. You should get a life...troll bot.
This guy cannot even spell Tippit’s name?.. But wants us to believe his nonsense?..
"Nobody wonders what Lyndon and I wear..."...It's GOLD!!
I told our local librarian that the Warren Report should be placed in the fiction section.
What did the Warren Commission get wrong?
@@willcollins6956 The other assassins for one thing.You didn't think that the Rothschilds would leave something this important up to chance,did you?
@@rentslave
I don't think Oswald ran with the Rothschields.
"I told our local librarian that the Warren Report should be placed in the fiction section.": Then you told a really stupid joke without even understanding why you said it.
absolutely
Dorothy Kilgallen knew the truth. She was silenced for it.
It's never been proven that her death had anything to do with the JFK assassination, and it has also never been proven that she had any special insight into the assassination.
She was killed because she interviewed Jack Ruby massive coverup the truth will never be known because they eliminated anybody who knew anything
@Wilt Chamberlain is the GOAT But where's the proof that she actually had anything? Also I think you may have the time frame wrong. My recollection is that she claimed that she would break the case wide open soon after she interviewed Jack Ruby in March, 1964, but her death wasn't until November, 1965, so if I'm correct I don't think most people would say "suddenly." She also ran a story in September, 1965 in which she said, "This story isn't going to die as long as there's a real reporter alive---and there are a lot of them." Also, at the time of her death she was working on a book which was to be titled "Murder One." In the publisher's advance advertisement for the book it was said that it was to be a study of the trials she had covered, including those of Sam Sheppardl, Wayne Lonegan, Dr. Bernard Finch, and Bruno Hauptman, but no mention of Jack Ruby. Even if the book was planned to include her coverage of the Ruby trial and it simply wasn't mentioned in the advertisement, it would be curious that she would relegate a major revelation about the JFK assassination to a book which discussed other trials as well. She also, starting long before she died, published quite a few articles in which she merely repeated conspiracy factoids given to her by Mark Lane.
@Wilt Chamberlain is the GOAT "Ruby may have told her for sure who was behind it." Uh-huh. I'm guessing you've never read the majority of Jack Ruby's testimony, correct? If you have, you should be able to tell us all here precisely why he begged Earl Warren to take him to Washington, and exactly who the sinister forces were who were supposedly preventing him from telling the truth in Dallas.
@@josephgeorge7385 "She was killed because she interviewed Jack Ruby." Really now? She interviewed Jack Ruby in March, 1964. She died in November, 1965. Why did "they" wait 20 months to kill her? Why did "they" give her 20 months to blab everything she knew to everyone she knew?
Or maybe she didn't have any "bombshell" about the assassination after all, and only mistakenly thought she did?
the biggest calamity this country has ever seen .. explain to me how a CIA director who gets fired by the victim gets to be on the warren commission ? Ill Wait .... Ive waited this long
Right Victor huge cover up Allen Dulles hated Kennedy
It was Lyndon Johnson who picked Earl Warren and either he or Warren picked Allen Dulles I'm guessing. Dulles was such a turd.
By the way, it's a very good chance Roscoe White was the Knoll shooter.
Damn, Dan Rather is blinking a WHOLE lot... wonder why...
"His head went violently FORWARD..." lol
@@josephgeorge7385 I don't recall any solid evidence ever being produced that Dulles hated Kennedy, such as a verbatim quote from a reliable source that Dulles said specifically that he hated Kennedy. What is your source for this claim?
@@Caeruleo Kennedy fired Dulles they say he held a grudge but my thing is Kennedy fired Dulles why was he on the Warren Commission
Gotta love how they chose all the witnesses that went along with the narrative. Not anyone with alternate viewpoints which was a thing from the beginning.
Paranoia. Oswald did this and he was the man who just shrugged a hollow, rambling reply that all but dodges the question when asked on live TV, "Did you shoot the President?"...
@@aaronz7056 okay Dick Tracy
Definitely involved, but not the only one.
@@klenmcrock5265 That's a brilliant witticism, I assume you use that on anybody who's not on board for this crackpot conspiracy nonsense?
@@aaronz7056 there's no way on mother earth that one dude pulled this off. The evidence to the contrary is greater than the tow the line narrative. You're telling me you don't see any inconsistencies at all? Don't be a clown.
Even Mr. Ed isn't as unbelievable as the Warren Commission Report.
well said .
Warren commission Fraud.
@@MrGibble64 Oh Wilbur.
If it whinnies like a horse then it must be a horse - making a big pile of horse shit.
I feel the same way about Dan Rather
Jesse Curry lied. Oswald asked on film for a lawyer. He was interrogated for hours without being permitted an attorney. The notes of the interrogation were destroyed. Humm what is going on?
Actually, there is a transcript but it was suppressed and sealed for 75 years……
miranda wasn’t around back then .
@@jrbonner5858 but the right to an attorney was.
Chief Curry was too busy hanging out on Airforce 1 watchin LBJ be sworn in.....
Oswald wanted a specific lawyer from NY, John Abt: but Abt wanted nothing to do with him. The president of the Dallas County Bar Association, H. Louis Nichols went to see him and Oswald told him he wanted Abt or a lawyer from the American Civil Liberties Union and didn’t need any help from the bar association to find an attorney. It should also be of interest to know that John Abt spent most of his career as chief counsel to the Communist Party USA.
A lot of people think that Oswald's view of the limo could not have been blocked by the leaves on the trees because it was November. While most trees shed their leaves in the fall and are bare during the Winter months, those trees were Texas Live Oak. Texas Live Oak trees shed their leaves in the Spring, not the fall. Therefore, his view was somewhat blocked for a few seconds anyway.
And the FBI cut down the tree and removed a lot of the signage
Dan Rather really needs to finally come clean about his reporting from November 1963.
“His head went FORWARD with
considerable violence!”
His meteoric rise from cub reporter to national prime time anchor is amazing.
I wonder why the ARRB didn’t examine him under oath in the 1990s to try to better understand how he reported the exact opposite of what he purportedly saw on the original Zapruder film.
He Would Be.. & totally is Guilty Of. Capital Crimes.. when convicted would be executed.. so don’texpect him to confess to covering up JFKs death.. But he did & is..Whenever he’s asked he said the same thing there is no evidence whatsoever to dispute the Warren commission findings he said it time and time again says all the conspiracy theories are wrong and he can prove it and every time he does he just lays his ass off he’s a scumbag
Yes, Rather is quite talented. A great guy, too.
CBS was part of Operation Mockingbird by the CIA.
Well said …. Well Spoken,,, Benji….
@@ronniebishop2496 at least… what is it. Mokinbird.. bet yer ass they did it.. bunch of fck wads. Don’t you think??? ever. get it??? me either I get NEWSDAY…. I crack myself up… all fkn day..
Listening to this level of B.S., is amazing they pulled it off.
no. people swallow bullshit like it's sustenance. If we could stop that from happening we could start reaching our potential for good things.
oh c'mon, what do you know about it?
@@peterfraser9070 he perhaps realizes that the only way to get away clean with a thing like that is if you are the international bankers and thus direct the CIA, Mossad, et cetera. You're the only one here who seems to extract his cabeza from his high-knee to speak.
@@peterfraser9070 I know his brain was stolen, I know Ruby shot Oswald on TV, I know dozens of witnesses turned up dead, I know after Nov 63, we get mass shootings, mass cult activity, mass war, and that's all I need to know about it.
@@lebergerdesphotons4565 Wow, you're so intellectual
This is the same Dan Rather who said he saw the Zapruder film and said Kennedy fell forward.
He described what he thought he saw funny thing he was proven to be right.
@@randyharris3175 Wow. So you fell for the suggestion?
Watch it again. That is not the only thing Dan Rather has lied about, either. He was not proven right at all.
Muscle reaction tightening up after brain exploded. Sheep did the same.
@@wtmerit6129 I get that, but watch it again and tell what what way he fell.
Can you do that instead of puking Dan Rather bull crap?
Physics are not on your side on this one. It is obvious that when the shot went through his throat, he leaned forward slightly, but when the shot came from the front, he fell back and to the left. Had he been shot from behind, all the blood and brains would have exploded in front of him.
The fact everything blew out behind means the shot came from the front.
Here is how to remember it, entry wound small, exit wound big.
Were the sheep alive and moving?
@@Matthew-pw3ng Dan rather = total puppet.
In March 1965, Jack Ruby stated in a news conference:
"Everything pertaining to what's happening has never come to the surface. The world will never know the true facts of what occurred, my motives. The people who had so much to gain, and had such an ulterior motive for putting me in the position I'm in, will never let the true facts come above board to the world."
The reporter asked, "Are these people in very high positions Jack"".
"Yes", Ruby responded.
That's from the horse's mouth - so no doubt, Mr. Ed would approve!
Now if only the mystery of Jack Ruby's mother's teeth in the Warren Report could be unpacked....
It’s hard to believe you have people still to this day claiming Lee Harvey Oswald shot the cop Lee Harvey Oswald shot the President Lee Harvey Oswald Didn’t shoot anyone ,thank you for your comment at least someone Paid attention excellent quote on Jack Ruby too but He said President Johnson’s at the top of his list.. not in so many words .. but yeah he did
And that’s funny too they took a study the Warren commission that is of Jack Ruby’s mothers teeth now even if Jack Ruby had BITTEN Lee Harvey Oswald to death.. His mothers teeth prints would have nothing to do with it and be of no value so you tell me why they did shit like that and Warren report geez maybe they didn’t want the truth do you think you made some really good points thank you
Ulterior motives is The single THING to UNDERSTAND in general
In 1965 I Said .. and I Quote “ Hay Mom I Want More Bananas in My Frosted Flakes”. She Did.. good times..
Why didn't Ruby ever reveal any of the details about the "true facts" and the "people in very high positions"??? He was arrested, tried for murder, convicted, and sentenced to death, but never revealed any of the deep, dark "facts" through any of that, and continued to not reveal any of it, through his death, January 3rd, 1967. It is a bit puzzling, isn't it, that he knew so much, but never revealed any of it? It is almost like he was talking out of his ass.
When American citizens were more trusting....had no idea they were being duped...and by the time this aired those who felt they were had seen or heard of too many strange deaths. Time always tells... God don't like ugly or evil...
oh yeah, brah .... that blonde babe in CLUELESS had snap, maaaan
The ugly irony is that people were duped by CT people like Mark Lane (Rush to judgement) and Jim Garrison (on the trail of the assassins), who lied thru their teeth to fabricate a conspiracy.
If there is a "God"...he has a lot to answer for!...Why would any caring entity even allow this to happen?
@@curbozerboomer1773can you control all the bugs in your garden on an individual basis? Get to decide which ones kill each other? Being a creator doesn't mean you control your creation, especially if you allow them free will.
Mr. ED! (An unexpected moment of levity).
Many Americans have researched this to death for 60 years or so -- and found out things are never what they appear to be.
"found out things are never what they appear to be": Here's a perfect example of that: th-cam.com/video/o0d6LG27hQM/w-d-xo.html
I loved watching Mr Ed!!
A horse is a horse of course of course
And no one can talk to a horse of course.
That is of course unless the horse
Is the famous Mister Ed!
Go right to the source and ask the horse.
He'll give you the answer that you'll endorse
He's always on a steady course.
Talk to Mister Ed!
People yakkity-yak a streak
And waste your time of day,
but Mister Ed will never speak
Unless he has something to say!
A horse is a horse of course of course
And this one'll talk 'til his voice is hoarse.
You've never heard of a talking horse?
Well, listen to this... 🐎 🗨 🗯 💭 🗨 💬 🐴 💬
"I am Mister Ed!
@@brendonwilhelmi_7251 HAHAHAHAHAHA!!! 🎶 of COURSE, of COURSE!😆 I still know others, to this day, who sing along!! Some great belly laugh memories on that show (driving the truck and Ed puts out left arm to signal the turn!!!) BWAHahahah. The 1st time we saw it, we hit the floor laughing our arses off!!
Ed shorts are on my playlist (remember when Ed hit the pitched ball... and sliiiiiiiding into home base !)
@@brendonwilhelmi_7251 Remember when he went into outer space? Seemed so real!
@@brendonwilhelmi_7251 , pretty appropriate that they interrupted a talking horse with their bullsh*t!!😉
What do you have when you put together 100 coincidences? A CONSPIRACY!
@rick4electric: What do you have when you misstate the case so you can get a conspiracy? Things that aren't right: 1) the number 100 2) your math 3) your logic..
What do you have when you have 100 co-conspirators planted all over town, each fully confident they can successfully get their hands on and undetectably alter every film of the assassination, successfully falsify all the medical and ballistics evidence, and succeed in outfoxing the entire legitimate law enforcement community every step of the way, each relying on luck, split-second timing, and praying to God that no random element, unpredictable witness, unanticipated complication or co-conspirator cracks or screws up, co-conspirators now obliged to spend the rest of their lives threatening and intimidating countless witnesses to never come forward and admit they were in danger if they didn't lie their asses off to the nation for 58 years? A flippin' MIRACLE.
@@aaronz7056 A plan?
And your point. How about 100 facts that the conspiracy nuts ignore.
@@baxterscruggs1716 Let's not give the "nuts" too much credit. The facts they ignore easily number more than 100...
This was the first bogus whitewashing of this murder. Note that one of the members, Allen Dulles, was dismissed by Kennedy. ..."On November 29, 1963, President Lyndon Baines Johnson appointed Dulles as one of seven commissioners of the Warren Commission to investigate the assassination of the U.S. President John F. Kennedy. The appointment was later criticized by some historians, who have noted that Kennedy had fired him, and he was therefore unlikely to be impartial in passing the judgments charged to the Warren Commission. In the view of journalist and author Stephen Kinzer, Johnson appointed Dulles primarily so that Dulles could "coach" the Commission on how to interview CIA witnesses and what questions to ask, because Johnson and Dulles were both anxious to ensure that the Commission did not discover Kennedy's secret involvement in the administration's illegal plans to assassinate Castro and other foreign leaders.[41]..."
@QuantumRift.... Not only were both LBJ and Allen Dulles anxious to ensure the Commission didn’t discover the secret plans to assassinate Fidel Castro, but it was more imperative to keep it a secret because Lee Oswald was a participant in a get Castro plot...There were Cuban Contingency Plans in place that would ensure the assassination could remain secret even before the assassination happened...when you have people like William King Harvey running the “Executive Action” program in America - a person who despised Kennedy - the assassination was inevitable
very good
But it was Walter Conkrite! Eveyrone accepted that if Walter Conkrite said it was so, it was the truth; According to the government. And the News.
Also fired by President Kennedy, was CIA Charles Cabell, who's brother was Earl Cabell, MAYOR OF DALLAS IN 1963.
Also fired by President Kennedy, was CIA Charles Cabell, who's brother was Earl Cabell, MAYOR OF DALLAS IN 1963.
This is sad that we find out that the newscasters we trusted were involved in making it appear that Oswald was guilty when clearly he wasn't. Example. A witness Howard Brennan saw the shooter on the six floor shoot then took time to observe if he hit his target. But the newscasters said Oswald could have shot then quickly run down the stairs to be found in the lunch room. Since the shooter took time and Oswald was found in a less than a minute and a half, the shooter could not be Oswald. The witnesses who saw the shooter who killed officer Tippet said he fired five times. But the gun Oswald owned had a broken firing pin and could not fire. The cop who said his thumb blocked the hammer of Oswald's gun was wrong. The shells found that had killed Tippet were from an automatic. Oswald had a revolver. Thus Oswald's gun did not kill Tippet. Other witnesses said the shooter had a partner and was not Oswald. The guy who picked Oswald in the line up had several choices. But all but Oswald were dressed in suits and the witness was told that the suspect was just arrested. Officer Curry said Oswald was given all his civil rights. Officer Lewis said Oswald never asked for a lawyer. But film shows Oswald asking for one. Thus the cop lied. Oswald never got an attorney. All the notes of Oswald's interrgation were burned. Why? His thumb print on the rifle was not there the first time they printed it. It was found only after Oswald was dead. The cops originally found a different rifle then the one bought by Oswald. Both Cronkite and Rather report all the shots came from the sixth floor but 80% of the witnesses including 20 plus cops said a shot came from the grassy knoll. Oswald was set up. Cronkite said nine people said Oswald was at the scene of the death of Tippet. That info was flat false.. Mrs Markham gave several different reports. Anther witness who was the closest who saw the shooting said it was not Oswald. She has disappeared, the package that Cronkite said was the rifle could not have been. More fake news. Etc etc, Cronkite and Rather parroted the Warren Report, There now is a mountain of evidence which proves Oswald was not the shooter but there were multiple shooters.
You sound like the scriptwriter for Oliver Stone. Like you, he created his own fantasy of what happened. It was the unanimous testimony of expert witnesses before the Warren Commission that the spent cartridge cases were fired from the revolver in Oswald's possession to the exclusion of all other weapons.
You forgot to mention the part about gun smoke being seen near fence on the grassy knoll. There was also a man who was stopped by a cop behind the fence with a secret service badge and dirty fingernails who for some reason was standing behind the fence and then told the cop to clear the area. The secret service said there was no such man that worked for them in the area that day. So who was this man and what was he doing ? Witnesses also saw this man standing near the fence prior to the shooting just hanging around.
@@samgambino9695 Saying it was clearly "gun smoke" is not accurate. Two of the witnesses said they thought it was exhaust fumes, as from a car or motorcycle. Interestingly, when Oliver Stone was making his full of lies movie about the assassination, a number of rifles were trotted out, none of which emitted any smoke (well maintained modern rifles don't produce smoke). The smoke had to be generated using special effects.
@@robertromero8692 what about the man who claimed to be a secret service agent ? Was he made up too ? With the dirty fingernails ? You seem to have missed that part.
@@robertromero8692 Who were the men in Dealey Plaza dressed as Secret Service agents? Who was the man that impersonated LHO in Mexico City in Oct 1963? Why was the autopsy evidence twisted around? Why did the HSCA move the head shot up about 4 inches? Why did the HSCA admit that someone was rearranging boxes by the sniper's nest minutes after the final shot, when LHO was on the 2nd floor face to face with DPD officer Baker? Why didn't the coworkers at the TSBD see LHO flying down the stairs?
This has been a CBS presentation, written and directed by the Warren Commission
Operation Mockingbird. They loved Jack, but they loved $ more.
Well said.
Of course. Walter Cronkite and Dan Rather were puppets of the Warren Commission. Now Dorothy Kilgallen , a CBS employee who's position was a panelist on 'What's My Line' had a talk with Jack Ruby sometime after the assassination. She was going to 'blow the case wide open.' Before she could she died of an 'apparent suicide.' due to excess consumption of barbituates. Back at that time , senator Prescott Bush was on the board of directors of CBS. CBS conducted their own investigation into the assassination---God only knows why. So, connect the dots.
Lee Harvey Oswald,asked for legal representation six times,during the time he was in police custody.How come he was Not afforded an attorney? The man,who supposedly came from some" legal organization" asked him if he wanted a lawyer?" What on earth was Jack Ruby doing there,after Oswald was being" paraded" up and down the corridor of the police st.? How is it,that Lee Harvey Oswald was taken a couple more times in front of All those reporters,when this Is the person,who was allegedly accused of shooting President Kennedy? I would think the police dept.would have kept Oswald away from All those people!
Not true he was offered an attorney even got a visit from a man name Nichols who went on his jail cell and asked him.do you want an attorney he said no.He was assisting on this Abt guy so that is a myth.
@Nancy Sanders-No legitimate Law Enforcement Department would allow any civilians to be present when a suspect or detainee was being transported To say that Jack Ruby was allowed in the basement because he was "friendly" and known by some of the officers is another lie perpetuated by the Warren Commission.
@@jerrybrownell3633 Show me where the WC said that?It was happenstance and just plain luck.
@@jerrybrownell3633 if you know the case you woukdnt have to make comments like that .He was being presented to show he has not been mistreated.
@@randyharris3175 - And please tell us what that had to do with Jack Ruby being there.
He was not a member of The Press. Show me where The Warren Commission said it
was perfectly normal for a civilian( Jack Ruby ) with a gun to be in that position.
yep, he also had ESP to get a job there way before the route was published
And with his qualifications and friends he can't get a better job that moving books at minimum wage?
@@Malcolm.Y Are your parents morons too?
@@Malcolm.Y What qualifications? What friends?
@@jputterman26 Only some of the people who address me on TH-cam are in the moron class.
@@slyjokerg A Marine, with training in electronics and Russian/
The Government will never let the truth come out!
Why would the government keep such incriminating docs - that would be so detrimental to them - in the first place? Or if they existed, why not destroy them long ago?
The truth is that it was Oswald, the secret files contain details of foul ups but not concerning any doubt of Oswald’s guilt.
Here we go..."Da Govmint" done did it!...yup, yup,yup!...idiots!
1:42 min even Dan finds it hard to believe Oswald learned Russian all on this own during his time in the Marines.
Russian is an extremely hard language to learn, but even harder to learn to speak and pronounce if you’re a native English speaker. The consonant clusters and unique vowels can’t be heard by many people since their ears aren’t attenuated to those sounds. Marina said she thought he was a native speaker when she met him in Belorussia. That is very odd. It means he received very professional language immersion training. Where would he have obtained that? We have no record of him attending DLI. USMC cohorts of his said he was studying Russian and reading books in Russian. That wouldn’t explain his pronunciation and conversational skills.
@@LRRPFco52 I recommend that you read "Harvey and Lee" by John Armstrong and watch some of his videos. (btw, Harvey and Lee pdf is available, free online.)
Where and how he learned Russian has absolutely nothing to do with the fact he took a rifle to work, shot the president and then fled the scene. Nothing.
@@kevinjones8929 sure keep moving along nothing to see here, Good Citizen.
@@kevinjones8929 You are entitled to your own opinion and beliefs. However, that being said, after looking at all the known evidence, you may be a person that just cannot handle the truth or..... you cannot be awakened because you are pretending to be asleep.
Oswald mother is so insightful "A Russian girl any foreign girl, a negro just any human beings, lives and breathe just as I do" All I see is a mother who loves her son and wanted him to be happy.
I respect his mother very intelligent
@@josephgeorge7385 She was almost as kooky as her son.
@@aaronz7056 Kooky - no. She said that some people in the State Department were behind the conspiracy....she knew what was kookin’.
@@lebeautymarq8834 You're joking, right?
@@aaronz7056 You’re just being kooky, right?
I just got into the Marguerite Oswald interview here and it is Pure Gold!! You can't find this stuff anymore!!
Yes you can, it's called the library of congress. You won't find the truth there, but all the paperwork is there.
Like he said he was a patsy. The men who shot Kennedy were professional ruthless and successful.. none of which you could call Oswald .
@@richardhartley4102 Reporter question: "Did you shoot the President?"
Oswald answer: “No, they've taken me in because of the fact that I lived in the Soviet Union...I'm just a patsy!"
It is clear from the context that Oswald is saying that the Dallas authorities are blaming him for the assassination simply because of the fact that he defected to the Soviet Union, and he was a convenient person for them to accuse.
@@woodie6408 Yes of course, as those in your camp are aware, the "truth" can be found only in "The Big Book of Functional Conspiracy Delusions."
He probably was a patsy. Was also probably directly involved in the assassination.
Idk about anyone else but if I was accused of killing the president I would be livid, emphatic, and very direct. When he's asked by the reporter he doesn't go to any length whatsoever to give an unambiguous response, he says "I haven't been charged with that yet...". Not the response of an innocent person
Best sign of coverup: At about 1:50 the WC is quoted as saying nobody at the overpass thought any shots had been fired from the front. But MULTIPLE people testified they had heard shot from the stockade fence and seen smoke, and MOST witnesses said they had heard shots from BOTH front and rear. If a report simply denies this, it's a lie. Cf. Josiah Thompson's 1967 and 2021 books on this case.
Even simpler, you’re either naïve enough to think ruby was just crazy or you’re not.
Had they held the limo for evidence they'd found shots came in from both the front and back and the head shot coming from the drain hole on the road with the blood shooting straight up and to the back. Kennedy out of the way they can make Vietnam a full blown war for the makers of war machines the oil men of Texas and steel mills. War is good for business never mind who gets killed just as long as they sell thier products. They are the puppeteers.
Robert... Hence the proverb "Never believe anything until the government denies it."
@@alexsegurasr3028 exactly!
Spot on. The biggest conundrum is that a shooter in that 6th floor window would have taken the easy shot on Houston with the limo headed directly at him before turning on Elm.
And here we sit, 60 years later with STILL NO ANSWERS....
Well, I wouldn't say that. After 60 years of additional research and document releases, it's a glaring certainty at least that the Warren theory was as bogus as it gets.
This is amazing. There’s stuff in here that I’d never seen or heard.
There's stuff in here that never happened *
Which makes it hard to have heard or seen.
@@DaveSCameron Please back up your false claims of “ There’s stuff here that never happened *” I am sure you are full of hot air and probably have never read any of the Warren Commission Report but rather you are simply parroting other people’s words!!!
@@wallacebell4311 I'll pass, perhaps you can try being civil with folks if you require conversation..
@@DaveSCameron like what??
Poor Mr Ed was cancelled, I can’t believe there wasn’t a public outcry.
I was thinking the same thing when this came on 😂😂😂 a horse is horse of course of course
@@johnbaugh2437 😆
mr.ed is better than any show today
The Mr Ed show was one of my favorites!
Sadly mr. Ed is more believable than this garbage
Dan Rather the guy that said JFK flew forward with the headshot after watching the Zapruder film. And he's been lying ever since.
He did go forward,2.25 inches forward then snapped back,kind of what happens when half your head is blown off from a shot from behind…
@@shanet5604 that's not what Dan said
Dan Rather the guy that said JFK flew forward with the headshot after watching the Zapruder film. And he's been lying ever since": th-cam.com/video/o0d6LG27hQM/w-d-xo.html
This is astonishing. Raises issues with the report about to drop live then Boom! Warren gives these answers and goodnight. It comes across as Warren PR to a viewer today.
It comes across as Warren PR to a viewer today.": Well of course it would come across that way to you!
Wondering was Dan complicit or had a gun to his head to do this ....
To go against the prestige of the US government at the height of the Cold War would have been unconscionable. Since all these journalists loved JFK, they probably preferred the lone nutjob theory anyway. Also, what real proof did they have to the contrary?
They would have been quite happy to report on arrests, trials and convictions of the conspirators should that have happened.
The warren report , a report that had the story all sorted before they started . After all these years that have past since the report , many people have researched almost everything about the three Murders that weekend in Dallas , interviewed all the people who came forward that day and this is what makes the WC floored , for them if they the witnesses didn’t fit there narrative of the lone nut they didn’t get a voice that day , the job of the WC was to collect only the evidence that would pin the assassination on LHO , the Dallas police dept played there part , fixers planted evidence and in the minutes following that final fatal shot , the cover up and the set up of LHO the patsy was in full swing , once Oswald was eliminated by Jack Ruby (not to save Jackie from a trial , but on the orders of his pay chiefs the Mafia) the investigation of the murder of a fellow police officer Stop dead like a stone ( the evidence against Oswald for killing Tippett was poor at best ) 60 years have past and with everything that has come out over these the passing years documents and the like , show the WC for what it is ….
I can hardly stomach Dan Rather...oh how I wish anyone but him had seen the Zapruder film before the feds got it...
"I can hardly stomach Dan Rather...oh how I wish anyone but him had seen the Zapruder film before the feds got it...": I can hardly stomach someone with your attitude, frankly. I know how much importance you attach to my opinion, so I just thought I'd let you know. 😉
60 years later it is still informative, conflicting , contradictory, and confusing.
THE TRUTH IS AS PLAIN AS DAYLIGHT
It's conflicting, contradictory, and confusing only if you ignore the evidence and listen to those who have no evidence, just stories for profit.
I remember the assassination and this time very clearly, but I was only 8 then. I don't remember this report and realize it would have been hard for me to understand the implications of the broadcast or the Warren Report. Looking at it now 58 years later, I realize it was a much more innocent/naive time for the people of the US. Mr. Cronkite and Mr. Rather both keep saying the questions will be answered by the Warren Report being released a few minutes later. It was a time when we though collectively that our government would always tell us the truth. We know better now.
So many lies to hide this coup even though the truth was evident and clearly stated in this broadcast. A marine taught Russian by the US government, got a loan from the US government to help him return to the US from Russia, got his passport within a day, testimony from his mother, files from observations, surveillance and face to face encounters with the Oswald family by the FBI and CIA prior to the assassination (they new all about him, but had no concern expressed to local authorities for him working on the parade route of the President), met with the person overseeing assassinations at the Russian Embassy in Mexico October 8 and involved in the murder of a US President 5 weeks later--all of this by a poor guy working a temp job for $1.50 an hour?
LH Oswald clearly had the support of the CIA and probably others. FBI Chief Hoover was a scum who was completely capable of something like the murder of Kennedy. Doesn't look like the people of the US have learned much. Since then, murders like this have become just part of business as usual and has changed the direction of the country.
In your 60s and you're an Ignorant Conspiracy Clown. How does one reach such an age and be as Stupid as you are?
Bingo
All men lie, even those in government.
There was so much fabricated stories created by forces within the government circles.The American people today are not fools and can see the true facts on the assassination.
The problem is that many people are still gullible and believe everything they hear - they've just transferred their faith from government to dishonest conspiracy authors.
We're NEVER going to learn the truth behind what happened that day.
absolutely correct !!!
Here’s the truth, it was Oswald with the Carcano on the Sixth floor, it was Oswald with the .38, hope that helps
@@BobK5 You would have to be the most gullible idiot to believe Oswald Acted Alone.
@@vernpascal1531 yes you’d have to be really very gullible to believe that Oswald took his M38 Carcano to work disguised as curtain rods after hearing that the motorcade was going to pass by his window and having already attempted at least one other assassination and believe he didn’t use it. You’d have to be really gullible to believe that he was acting alone on the overwhelming evidence that no other gunmen were seen, no other shots were fired, no other shells were recovered except those from Oswald’s rifle in the TSBD.
What do you think Oswald took his own mail order rifle to work for?
The truth is Vern you’ve got to be a complete fantasist to join up dots where they don’t exist, your gullibility is what Oswald, the violent liar, the repeated wife beating self proclaimed Marxist, the fluent Russian speaker, the Cuban agitator from Russia with love, the attempted assassin and then imagine for the sake of convenience that anyone in their right mind would want to work with that ego inflated self important fruitcake in any plot.
Do you have any evidence that Oswald was not alone, other than with his wife?
Think what you will about its overall premise, this remains, due to its assemblage of interviews, the most valuable single production by a 1960s U.S. network regarding JFK's murder. Several people in this broadcast weren't interviewed too often, if at all, thereafter. While others who appear remained talking-head staples for decades and this would be among their first filmed renditions.
After Warren Report was issued, all U.S. networks supported its conclusions to the hilt. But at this moment--when the reporters had recently seen the official version, but the public hadn't, and their interviews had already been filmed--CBS allowed itself final flickers of journalism before network objectivity on the subject (and maybe a few others) was extinguished.
And Walter's introduction, as if narrating a Movie of the Week trailer, is a classic: "The Wife...The Mother...The Best Friend..."
Guess you know about the CIA Mockingbird media project and that most famous quote about it?
But the police have footage of Dinsdale actually nailing your head to the floor.
I totally this is the best coverage better than Mark Lane
@@josephgeorge7385 Mark Lane's middle names could have been "Leading Witnesses." Somehow, a guy who was Jim Jones' right hand man, who made no attempt to warn off Leo Ryan from the death trap he was walking into at Jonestown, and who thus has blood all over his hands, doesn't strike me as a man with boundless credibility.
@@aaronz7056 This is just like you trying to link Oswald with the moon men.
The first Dallas Police Officer to reach the top of the grassy knoll, whose name I can't recall, testified that when he reached the top of the knoll, being one of the first people up there, he encountered 2 men, wearing suits, who he assumed to be Secret Service. He testified that one of them showed him an ID, at which point he disregarded them and continued looking for a potential rifleman.
The issue being that the Dallas Secret Service had only 6 agents employed at that time, and one of the agents was on vacation that day. The other 5 all accompanied the motorcade to Parkland Hospital. So, who were those 2 men?
It Wasn’t Wendell Wilkie …
Well, neither of them was Oswald!!!!
It wasn’t Wendell Wilkie…pretty sue..
The HSCA admits that someone was moving the boxes by the sniper window within minutes after the final shot, at the same time LHO was on the 2nd floor face to face with officer Baker.
The AARB admits that the 35 yr old man with the receding hairline and stocky build in Mexico City in October 1963 at the Cuban embassy claiming to be LHO was an impersonator. Why did someone impersonate LHO at the Cuban embassy, other than to later implicate LHO as having an escape plan to the USSR.
Why was it necessary for the govt to kidnap JFK off AF1 at Andrews and perform a pre-autopsy autopsy?
Maybe he made that story up
Bill Hicks said how realistic the assassination museum is because when you go to the place where Oswald was supposed to be, he wasn't there just like he wasn't at the moment of the assassination.
Who says Oswald wasn't at the 6th floor window during the assassination? How bizarre. So Oswald let a look-alike use the rifle that he brought - his rifle - and this look-alike somehow managed to leave Oswald's prints? Wow. Bizarre.
@@peterfraser9070 I think "peter fraser" is a mind controlled doofus with the far-fetched idea that he thinks for himself.
@@lebergerdesphotons4565 And you think for yourself, just believing these crazy stories by highly unreliable sources?
@@peterfraser9070 You give yourself away as a victim of the most common logical fallacy to which humans fall victim. The appeal to authority. You are looking for "reliable sources" rather than logically coherent sequences.
@@lebergerdesphotons4565 What are the logically coherent sequences in this case?
Wow, seeing undeveloped Dallas is weird.
Shucks, I love Mr. Ed. Maybe next time.
It shows children were force educated on findings of the Warren Report. Let the brainwashing begin.
Too bad people didn't get to hear this thing from the horse's mouth! Alls they got was Jack Ruby's mother's teeth in that Warren Report....
FORMISANOISATOTALSHITBAG
@@shernitadee uth ugh
@@nancywhitson7609 ???
The Marines certainly facilitated his trip to Russia, whether they ordered him or not.
He wasn't supposed to go anywhere according to his discharge, because he left the Corps early on the grounds that his mom was ill and needed him at home to care for her.
He NEEDED the Marine Corps permission to travel outside of the US as he was required to enlist in the Reserves as a part of his discharge agreement. He was granted this permission after applying for it almost immediately after leaving. Citing he was to go to Switzerland to study at The Albert Schweitzer School, (which has long been regarded as a CIA front...).
So they discharged him to go home and look after his mom, and immediately granted him permission to leave his sick mom, violating the terms of his discharge.
And considering his defection and announcement that he would tell the Russians everything he knew, and considering that the "Untouchable" U2 spy plane flown by FG Powers (the sort Oswald was trained to track...) was shot down during his stay in Russia, it's really very odd that he was never even questioned by the authorities on his return. Or not in any "official" capacity at any rate.
As Costner as Garrison points out in Stone's "JFK" he should have been arrested and charged as a traitor. But he was granted a new passport and loaned the money to travel home.
Presumably they were more keen to make sure he fulfilled his promise to go home and take care of his poor old mom, than get to the bottom of his time in Russia, and Lee clearly needed his new Russian bride, (whose granting of a visa was as close to a miracle as the US State Department has ever performed) to help?
THIS, THIS, THIS!! Oswald lied time and time again, even committing a felony of printing false identifications for not only himself but others. It seems he could do no wrong and his family was well taken care. Even with the birth if his new baby, they set them up and our tax dollars paid for the hospital of the new baby girl.
His mission to the Soviet union was to breakup the Paris peace SUMMIT set for middle MAY 1960 but the MAY 1 1960 U 2 shootdown broke off the Paris peace SUMMIT and continued the rightwing warhawk COLD WAR
His first mission was in Japan at the queen bee night club in downtown Tokyo ( go inside the queen bee and provide false information to KGB AGENTS at the queen bee about the U2 spy planes at atsugi air base )
Queen bee in downtown Tokyo was loaded with female KGB spys wanting to know about the U2 overflight operation over Soviet airspace
Oswald was successful in his first mission with the O.N.I and was later recruited by the CIA to go to Russia
how someone who defected to Russia could just return to the USA so easily at the height of the Cold War - like he was just returning from a fishing trip in Canada - makes no sense whatsoever
They need him to he the only one. Oswald who was a radar operator asked to have an early discharge, it was granted by the marines, he left for Europe. While in Europe he defected to the USSR and denounced the USA and surrendered his passport to the US embassy in Moscow. The State department, FBI can CIA were notified of his actions at the height of the cold war. How did he get passports for himself and his family? Who authorized the passports? if you start at this point in time we will find all the connections to the government we need to know it was a conspiracy.
"They need him to he the only one.": I used to believe the Warren Report was bs only because I'd heard that it was. That, plus 'back and to the left' and stories of suspicious goings on going on behind the picket fence made me think, "Isn't there something to all that? Did Oswald really do it??" Then I saw the film of the actual witnesses talking and realized how "JFK" and other CT sources distorted the witnesses own words. I looked at the Z Film and realized, hey, his head explodes and stuff flies forward, after that, his upper-body jerks back. He wasn't knocked back by a bullet. Then looking at frames 312 to 314 I could see he'd been knocked forward first. These silly notions of a massive conspiracy just evaporated. It was like when I was a kid and realized, hey, how could there really be a Santa Claus who flies around the world in one night and delivers presents to everyone. It was like waking up from a dream and soon realizing, oh, of course, that was only a dream. There isn't really an elephant in the next room.
Well this all appears to be in fine order so we can all go home now...
Official history all produced and wrapped up with a bow on it. They could make a truth out of whatever they wanted it to be.
Well said ....shiny bow!
Official “government” history. Do you trust the government today?
Very simple cause on Oswald killing Tippit anybody arguing otherwise is delusional.
@@justanotherperson584 ie was wrapped up in a bow because it was so damn obvious.
@@lukewarme9121 it's not government history its eyewitness testimony.
If you muddy the water, it makes it impossible to see the truth .
It's kinda funny how Mrs Paine befriended the Oswalds then, of all places, conveniently helped Lee Harvey get the job at the school book depository !
Yeah, that loser’s luck didn’t run out until he scurried past a crime fighting shoe salesman
Mrs Paine is a Lying Government. Scumbag.. so is or was her scumbag husband… there are hundreds on the coverup payroll. & the assassination as well
@@donaldleavy4379 There must be a hefty TH-cam payroll too 😂😂
She didn’t help,Marina asked her did she know of anybody hiring for work for Oswald,he went for the interview and got it ! Hardly like Ruth Paine was insisting on it,you’re making a moot point !
@@shanet5604 forget about it, no one’s insisting Ruth Paine masterminded it. It’s just one more point of interest-Oswald working at a building owned by the founder of the civil air patrol.
Who could get a yank into Russian in 60 ? End of the debate
George De Mohrenchildt whom he met in Japan, an old OSS working on U2. He was not trusted enough to be CIA. He was a geologist in the oil, he was Oswald's "best friend" introduced him to Ruth and Michael Paine, who feed, housed, helped with every need including diapers and clothes for the baby and new baby, and kept his wife, wife to Michael who trained helicopter pilots in Cuba. Michael Paine took Oswald on many errands, to dinner parties by the " White Russians" headquartered in Dallas. Maybe to General Walker's house. Oswald went to George M's hometown Minsk in Russia which is Belarus now. and was introduced around by him through references and helped with learning Russian and friends that helped Oswald.
@mike .D
Oswald's defection to the Soviet Union at the height of the Cold War only testifies to his kooky and unstable character, not to any conspiracy.
@@apointofinterest8574 how do you know this?? He was being used, he wanted to be a spy! Height of the Cold War, we just had missiles pointed at us, the country was on high alert school, towns were practicing to run to fall out shelters! Scary times!
@@shernitadee The Soviets, apprehending his neurotic, unstable character, and ascertaining how little he knew about the U2, never took Oswald nor his spy ambitions seriously. Thus, Lee's hopes of playing James Bond came to an abrupt end. Oswald's reaction to this disappointment, as well as to failing to become a Soviet citizen, and also being threatened with deportation? He tries to commit suicide by slitting his wrist. Some spy....
@@apointofinterest8574 the Russians sure shot down our U2 while Oswald was in Russia. He played both sides.
Dan Rather started his long history of "tall Tales" on November 23, 1963.
Disappointing to see Dan Rather had not learnt his lesson manipulating & reporting information he knew not to be true but was the story the Government wanted spread. This same behavior ended his credibility & career as a newsman during the 2000 election when he reported falsely about GWB's military service using fake documents.
He lies like a Texas rattler does on a rock in December. Dan likes quips like this. He lied after viewing the Z film and stated Kennedy was pushed forward when shot.
Dan Rather started his long history of "tall Tales" on November 23, 1963: Imagine Rather saying Kennedy's head went forward with considerable violence: th-cam.com/video/o0d6LG27hQM/w-d-xo.html
They didn’t know at the time, but what a crock of you know what!
What a highly deceptive and lying person Oswald was. Too many people like that and they are dangerous.
Oswalds mother says that she believes he was an agent in Russia and that he was ordered to go to Russia and marry his Russian wife. I think she said that because she actually had knowledge of these things from Lee. I’m not sure why she chose to say that she believed those things, instead of saying she knew
Maybe she said those things because she was crazy...
She didnt know nothing .She tried saying that to Robert Oswald and he told her now mommy shut up.
Really you don't know why she said that?
She was just as delusional and whacked as her son.
Oswald's brother Robert worked for the CIA. Humm what is going on?
13:28 Dan Rather says Oswald signed his FPfCC membership card with an alias, but we can clearly see he did not!!!!
On this particular story, Dan Rather has always been full of shit. Shame on you Dan Rather, you know better. What is it that you were so afraid of? You did not do your job.
I could take a guess at what he was afraid of. That he might not get a good national gig as a reporter that was well-paid.
@@timhuwe5953 Tim, you are right. Same with Cronkite.
The thing Dan Rather also lied about the Zapruder film
The alias reads A J Hidell Chapter President. Rather is not wrong.
At 1:34:42 Connally was later proven correct and the Commission was wrong. Connally was NOT struck by the first bullet.
Another excellent video Vince. .
That’s a bummer about Mr. Ed not being on that night.
You probably were not even around then September 64 ???
There is a theory that Mr. Ed was the shooter that killed JFK. That's why his show was not on TV that night.
Lee's mother was nicer than they made her out to be on a few movies I seen.
I noticed that too.
Yeah 👍, I seen , maybe they wanted to dramatized her to make the movie more dramatic...tssk Hollywood 🎭
@@jdjjdjd2667 lol right
I've seen a couple places she was made out to be a Karen snob.
@@grungetruck8243 Not surprised , I wasn't even born at this time 😑!! I think my parents was just about to meet each other at a night club in Newark, New Jersey 🇯🇪 in '64. Then I👶 came in '65 ! I was fascinated & NEVER believed Lee Harvey Oswald was alone crazed assassin out to kill JFK. It was President James A Garfield who was really injured by crazed office seeker James Guiteau! The incompetence of the president's physician for not allowing further medical assistance is what killed him lead poisoning from The Gunshot wounds
She is not only nicer that made out by commentators such as Bob Schieffer but also more intelligent and well able to answer the questions put to her. I also believe she was right in her opinions that he was taught Russian by the Marines, was sent to the Soviet Union by the CIA, and requested to marry a Russian by his handler. Mrs. Oswald, the first to be interviewed in this video, made a lot of sense. I would rather have watched Mr. Ed than hear some of the others.
Nothing to see here folks.
Keep moving…do as you’re told.
Oswald fired two shots at Kennedy. The first shot hit the ground near the Kennedy car. The second shot hit Kennedy in the lower part of his neck and exited Kennedy and hit John Connelly and exited Connelly and fell on to Connelly s stretcher at the hospital. The third shot was not fired by Oswald. The third shot fired at Kennedy was a different type bullet. The bullet exploded upon impact after striking Kennedys head. Bullet fragments recovered during autopsy verified the bullet fragments were different than the bullet recovered from John Connelly s stretcher after the bullet passed thru Kennedy and Connelly. No the third bullet was not fired from the grassy knoll. The third shot was fired from the 1963 Ford convertible following the Kennedy car. The shot was fired accidentally hitting Kennedy. The third shot was accidentally fired. There was reports that three shell casings were found on the floor in the building. Perhaps an empty shell casing was in the chamber of the fire arm. The empty casing was discharged and two shots were fired then the third shot was fired.
Can you post the episode of Mr. Ed they didn't air? I was hoping it would be here somewhere before the video ended.
Mr. Ed would probably be better honest journalism than this.
@@TrueNovice that horse had a hog on him!
That is funny.
"TRUST NO GOVERNMENT," ----Thomas Jefferson
"It's the duty of every citizen to question authority".
- Benjamin Franklin
Don't trust jokers who write books with titles like "Mortal Error", to cash in on the JFK bandwagon either.
@@peterfraser9070 cash in on the bandwagon?
@@alwagner9722 It means you need to look objectively at available facts and evidence and question alternative sources - the ones that vilify what they disparagingly call "official versions", meanwhile offering dishonest versions of their own.
@@peterfraser9070 looking at the facts and evidence objectively should work both ways. For researchers and those who accept only the official report.
I'm a natural born skeptic. I question everything, including alternate conspiracy theories. I also question the official version. After researching everything from the Central Bank to JFK , Gulf of Tonkin incident, USS Liberty attack, OKC bombing and 9/11, I absolutely do not trust anything that comes out of the mouth of a US politician.
You may be patriotic, maybe a vet,whatever, the thing is, do you not question anything about the Warren Report? You discount every aspect of all the different conspiracy theories surrounding the assassination? It's called objectivity..right? Look at the Commission staff. All DC insiders and one Allen Dulles. My opinion of politicians - I like to refer to them as DC swamp creatures, dictates: DO NOT TRUST THEM.
When one looks at the big picture..not just JFK...and realizes the dubious nature of the US government, from 1913 to 9/11/01, it's like a lifting of the veil. And with the corporate owned Mockingbird media, well...they've got everything and everyone (the dumbed down) American public, under control.
Cheers!
Crushed this entire video at 4:30 in the morning for no reason... anyyyyways... off to bed
Plain and simple.......AND Chilling.
One question I’ve never heard answered is, if Oswald was really bringing curtain rods into the building, and not a rifle, were the curtain rods ever found? Anyone know?
They were given to his mistress?
No curtain rods were ever found in the Depository.
@@Caeruleo humm so?
Oswald's room had curtains. No curtain rods were ever in Oswald's possession; he brought his rifle to work, partially disassembled I believe, nicely wrapped in brownish paper. He used the rifle to slay Kennedy. The circumstances at the TBD were odd in that they were restoring or replacing flooring at the level Oswald fired from- so stacks of books were all pushed to one side, inadvertently creating a convenient wall for Oswald to work behind. Like most assassins, Oswald was a nut job; and in his case a political nut job. The boy left the USA to immigrate to the USSR! OY VEY! NOBODY but a nut job does that! The folks in Russia, who didn't quite know what to make of him wanted to ask him, "your what hurts?"
@@bobdecarlo7778 yea yea you can parrot the lone gunmen nut jobs. But Buel Fraiser who drove him to work said Oswald did not have a rifle. End of story.
Nearly six decades later, millions of people still doubt that Oswald acted alone.
Many don't even think he did the shooting. Now that's really bizarre considering the evidence, but then again, they don't care about the truth, they're just in love with conspiracy stories.
thats because we have a race of baboons who should not be allowed to vote and sent to the adjustment class and learn how to read and write
Ignorance and Hollywood. People just don’t know the facts and mountains of evidence against Oswald because its been muddied over with 60 years on conspiracy nonsense. That’s why it’s great the dpd took a lot of eyewitness testimony in the days after, because now we can see who has changed their stories after lane’s book and others come out that flooded their head with conspiracies. ie. Hill. They don’t claim they see nothing out of the ordinary in the days after, but years later, after the books came out, now they see a shooter on the grassy knoll, a puff of smoke or something. And the second thing is purely fictional Hollywood movies like JFK. With nothing but conspiracy theories parading around as fact. And also people watch too many movies and think that stuff can happen in real life, like a bunch of cia Jason bournes pulled this off.
Watch JFK to 9/11 a Richman's trick
@@SaadKhan-og9pp No thanks.
"During that very short and sweet hearing...": alright Oswald!
From the perspective of a trigger puller, the facts of the WC case against LHO make very little sense. If a lone shooter with any training was setting up in the TSBD building, 6th floor, SE window, he would have started shooting as the limo approached the building on Houston. Unobstructed view and zero escape route for target; he could have thrown the rifle as the car made that stupid turn onto Elm St. Why weren’t the Dal-Tex and Records buildings cordoned and searched as well? They were much better shooting positions. Second, the scope was a hindrance, not an aiming aid. FBI lab had to shim it just to get POI ‘on paper’ but it wasn’t reported to be loose, like if it had been dislodged by being tossed into its hiding place. Third, no proof of firing that M-C by Oswald was found. That leaky old piece would blow GSR all over a shooter’s face over 3 shots. Fourth, the chain of custody of the cartridge cases (one of which was not capable of having been fired that day) is suspect, and of course the CE 399 story is pure fiction throughout. In all, it would have taken a law intern before an honest court about 30 minutes of entering motions to get the case thrown out, had LHO been tried for JFK’s murder. The Tippet case would have taken more work, but it probably would have ended in a hung jury or an acquittal. A good defender would have destroyed Helen Markham, for starters. She was the real lone nut on that day.
you only need to hear about this one fact to understand; immediately after
the deed,they started repairing and refurbishing the limousine.
AFAIK,this is a federal felony.
If it is a federal felony now, I'm not sure it was back then. The murder of a president itself was not a federal crime back then; it was designated as a state crime only.
@@Caeruleo
i meant the tampering w evidence material.
@@sebastianrutkowski7316 The tampering with evidence material, at that time, was not a federal crime, because the murder itself was not a federal crime, as I have already explained.
I agree only a bunch of clowns would touch evidence.
@@Caeruleo are you sure the John Birch Society didn’t have something to do with that? 🤔
22 November 1963 was a day full of Paine with never a Dulles moment.
U$A's old Johnson was Ruby red from the suction of a Hoover. All involved are burning in Hell .
"22 November 1963 was a day full of Paine with never a Dulles moment.": GROOOOAN!
My sister was 18 and I was 14. We were celebrating our birthday. It came as a surprise and eventually a shock because it was the first time we had seen an assassination. Radio/TV stations eventually went silent in respect for President Kennedy💔😢
@@peterfraser9070 You reacted to that comment ten months after it was posted ‘Peter Fraser’ 😂😂😂
@@lebeautymarq8834 Ah 'Le Beauty Marq', you're one of those guys who just says the stupidest paranoid conspiracy sh%t ever. Have a nice paranoid life.
Too bad "Mr. Ed" was interrupted. The show about a talking horse was more believable than the Warren Report.
It wasn't a nick in the windshield, it was a hole, also a dent in the frame, and it wasn't Oswald at the shooting range, the same guy was seen there after the assasination, witnesses saw two men on the sixth floor, the description didn't match Oswald, they were ignored, Oswald was a double agent, with the CIA and FBI, set up, a patsy like he said, parafin test of his cheek was negative, only a small amount in his hand, could easily have been from handling books. It was LBJ that gave the green light, members of the CIA with help from the mafia and some cuban exiles, the Tippit bullets didn't match Oswalds gun, in fact two different shell casings were found at the scene, witnesses saw two men, neither one llooked liked Lee, they were ignored, another police car was seen around the corner, supposedly they found a wallet at the scene, how would he drop his wallet? he had a wallet on him when they picked him up at the theatre, another man was taken out the back door of the theatre, a fingerprint of LBJs hit man Malcolm Wallace was found on the sixth floor, identified by an expert, later conviently changed by a hired expert. So many other red flags etc...The WC was a joke.
There is so much inaccurate about that, I don't know where to begin....
"witnesses saw two men on the sixth floor": ON THE 5TH FLOOR (they're on film). YOU should be ignored. (But I was too tempted to reply.)
@Phil Wright: Yes, witnesses also saw Elvis on the 6th floor. But that's impossible, because he was in Nevada, doing two shows a night at the Area 51 cafe.
"they were ignored": just as you deserve to be
@@aaronz7056no
I want to know the truth not some fairy tale
Very interesting film which, if viewed (and listened to ) carefully contradicts the Warren Commission on numerous occasions. For example, at 47:00, the 'dot' on the back of the "President" indicates where he was shot- and this is the bullet that, according to the Warren Commission, then manages to come out from the President's neck, just above his shirt collar. Only problem is that the shots were, according to the Warren Commission, all coming from the sixth floor of the TSBD building. Only possible if the shooter was in the boot of the car and shot through the back seat...shooting upwards ofcourse....
I guess they never found the curtain rods. And there was chicken that had been eaten in the building where did he get chicken?
Computer analysis and medical analysis shows very clearly the bullet's trajectory and all the wounds suffered by the victims line up perfectly with Oswald's window. Don't forget the limo was travelling on a downhill grade as well.
@@aaronz7056 The conspirators stole the brain because they didn't want traces of mercury from the mercury loaded exploding bullet to be discovered on it!
Clint Hill burned all his blood stained clothing.
Jackie's pink suit is locked away for a gazillion years.
Must be the mercury, man!
@@lebeautymarq8834 Must be the weed, man!
@@aaronz7056 It must be the coke when you start believing in magic bullets, disappearing shotguns, exploding heads that reappear whole again in photographs....yeah, you’d have to be off your head to believe in the Warren magic show!
To ask very good questions and then state that "only the Warren Commission can answer that" is either ludicrous, or intellectual negligence, or of course, apologetics for the Warren Church! JWC
Roy Truly ,boss at the TSBD, didn't see Oswald bring in a large parcel that day, he said Lee had nothing in his hands when he walked into work ....
"Roy Truly ,boss at the TSBD, didn't see Oswald bring in a large parcel that day,": Frasier said he definitely carried the package to the TSBD. He didn't leave it in the car. Truly never claimed that he saw Oswald entering anyway. That was someone else. And the guy didn't notice a longish slender package carried along his body. Then again, he couldn't say for sure he WASN'T carrying anything. See how these things get distorted?
I was eating a grilled cheese sandwich and watching an episode of Matlock from my DVD box set earlier today when I realized that I was under 4 years old when JFK was assassinated and that all this time I have not been doing my part in getting to the bottom of this investigation.
My feelings went from "I'm going to quit my job to devote my entire life to this" to "I have no frame of reference.... I'm like a child who wanders into the middle of a movie and wants to know..." But at the same time I'm thinking that the answers are most likely found in Hunter Biden's laptop, but what do I know.... oh well, fuck it, I'm going bowling.
I was eating a bag of sour cream and onion chips and watching my DVD collection of McMillan and Wife when I realized that I was 5 years old when that show began, and all that I cared about at the time was watching Romper Room. Remember Romper Room? That was an American show, right? I wonder if it's still on the air. I wanted to be on that show...
Sounds like you have a good life. But try and upgrade from "pasteurized processed cheese product" to real cheese. It costs more. But cost shouldn't matter to a a Democrat.
@@bluesandmore786 Ahhh...in other words, don't just let the CT Machine spoon-feed you conspiracy theories and gobble it up. Look at real-life evidence and accept the truth, even if it's boring and Oswald did do it, mostly likely all by his lonesome.
@@peterfraser9070 -go read your copy of Why British Genetics Are Substandard.
@@bluesandmore786 Speaking of Blues and More....your ID brings back memories...... back in the late 80s, the owners of B.L.U.E.S. on Halsted street in Chicago decided to open a music club that ventured into other styles - Zydeco, for example - and called it Blues Etcetera. They didn't have grilled cheese sandwiches, but it was a great little place.
In an interview with LBJ filmed in September 1969, Walter Cronkite asked LBJ whether he was satisfied there was no international conspiracy in the JFK assassination. LBJ requested that his answer not be broadcast on the grounds of 'national security'. It was eventually broadcast after his death.
The following is what he said:
LBJ: "I can't honestly say that I've ever been completely relieved of the fact that there might have been international connections".
Cronkite: "You mean you still feel that there might might have been?"
LBJ shifts uncomfortably in his seat.
LBJ: "Uh, well I have not completely discounted it".
Cronkite: "Well that would seem to indicate that you, uh, don't have full confidence in the Warren Commission Report".
LBJ: "No. No, I think the Warren Commission study an....I think first of all is composed of the ablest and most judicious and bipartisan men in this country. Second, I think they had only one objective and that was the truth. Third, I think they were competent and did the best they could. But I don't think that they or me or anyone else is always absolutely sure of every thing that might have motivated Oswald or....or...others that, uh, could have been involved".
LBJ didn't 'orchestrate' the JFK murder
@@lebeautymarq8834 and they got Oswald to do it? Sounds a bit far fetched
@@peterfraser9070 Oswald was just the patsy.
@@lebeautymarq8834 He lied to the cops and cameras at the police station about a lot of things. He said on film he didn't know why he had been brought in to the station. But during his arrest at the theatre earlier, when he was first approached by a policeman, he said, "This is it!", punched the cop and tried to shoot him!
@@peterfraser9070 None of that proves he shot the president though ✌️
I was in 3rd grade when it happened and they let us out of school early that day ! I was so happy because we hated Kennedy and were being let out early ! I skipped down the sidewalk to the school bus ! Later I saw Kennedy's young son step forward and salute his father during the funeral procession ! This touched me deeply and 54 years later I saluted my father at his funeral !!! The Kennedys were LOVED and HATED !!! Go figure ???
FACT....Ole Joe Kennedy was genetically and intrinsically rotten to the core..and as for that trumped up story about JFK being a hero...grossly exaggerated and edited by the media (Joe's good ole boy friends) to get his son into the Whitehouse!
Lies, lies, lies. When will Americans overcome? Damn lies.
The audio recordings from that day PROVE that there were AT LEAST 2 gunmen! Also, the limousine should have become a shrine. Instead, it was illegally shipped to Detroit, quickly rebuilt and sent back to Washington, D.C.! What does THAT tell you?
@Wilt Chamberlain is the GOAT The hole in the windshield was made by something striking it from the inside, most likely a fragment from the fatal head shot.
What "audio recordings," plural prove that there were at least two gunmen? Do you mean the DPD dictabelt recording, singular, debunked way back in the 1980s and by now considered *not* to be a bonafide audio recording of the shots after all?
They didn't even set up a crime scene perimeter. The Limo was peppered with bullet holes. I have copies of photos shown in a video of the assassination.
@@glockumollie1230 "The Limo was peppered with bullet holes. I have copies of photos shown in a video of the assassination."
If you've seen photos of JFK's limousine "peppered with bullet holes" this was quite obviously from a very unreliable source, and these are quite obviously not genuine photos of the limousine from November 22, 1963. There were no bullet holes in the limousine at all, unless you count the single one in the windshield only.
@@Caeruleo you have no proof for that false claim about the limo.
Was there a conspiracy?
I can't laugh that hard
Me neither, after all these years there is still no credible evidence of one.
At 1:05:32....what is so difficult about picking up a fare, ask what the destination is, while doing that write the pick-up time, drive to the destination, and then record the drop off time?
Yes, let's listen to Dan Rather's less than subjective analysis of the evidence. JFK's head was seen to move forward with considerable violence, right Dan?
it was
Oswald is noted as a "fair" marksman and then the testimony to him practicing is found to be mistaken identity. So he's still just a fair shooter and pulls this off within a short time window, a freaking tree in the way and a moving target.... I'm not saying he didn't kill Tippit but shooting an officer seems like an awfully good way to get yourself noticed. Not something a guy who planned to kill the president would do. Add to that how quickly Oswald was shot which may raise a red flag or two but then Jack Ruby dies as well? Now that's just sus.
Oswald was a highly rated marksman. His scorebook still exists and demonstrates this, as does his record. His first shot was deflected by the tree branch, the second drilled straight through both victims and the third finally killed JFK with cratered entrance wound. Oswald probably panicked when Tippit approached him; he tried to shoot Officer MacDonald in the theater only minutes later, in front of witnesses, and it took a crowd to subdue him. Ruby died of cancer, in 1967.
@@aaronz7056 You are wrong....perhaps read 'On the Trail of the Assassins' by Jim Garrison, 'Crossfire' by Jim Marrs, 'Mary's Mosaic' by Peter Janney, 'The Devil's Chessboard' by David Talbot. These books outline the truth of the situation - sniper teams from multiple positions. A lot of information has been uncovered since 1963. The conspiracy to assassinate JFK was a state sanctioned political murder. The same thing has happened in other countries all over the world!
Allen Dulles. He was looking for himself. Ex head of the CIA had a lot of clout to get his “retired” self appointed as one of the “8 prominent Americans”
Dulles and his brother were corrupt fascists. Just ask the people of Guatemala and Iran, who saw their democracies die so the Dulles brothers and their cronies could make more money of their corporate holdings. The book Bitter Fruit documents all this.
Dulles and Bush41 were both CIA Directors forced to resign by JFK and Al Gore with Bill Clinton. Both Directors were connected to the Kennedy assassination and the 2000 voting controversy thru two sets of brothers, the Cabell and the Bush brothers. Earl Cabell was the Mayor of Dallas and Jeb Bush was the Governor of Florida. Mayor Cabell's brother was the ex-CIA Deputy Director Charles Cabell, forced to retire along with his CIA boss, Allen Dulles, by JFK. Governor Jeb Bush's brother, George W Bush, father was forced to retire as President by the presidential team of Al Gore and Bill Clinton. Texas was the home state of the next President, Vice President Lyndon Johnson. Florida was the political home state of the brother of the next President, the son of a Vice President, George W Bush. Not a coincidence, to much to be just a coincidence. It was a similar repeat of the Kennedy assassination in Florida. Why?
@@wtmerit6129 President Kennedy was assassinated in Dallas, Texas, not in Florida.
@@gymnastix
Florida, that’s funny. These “fact-checkers” can’t even keep their facts straight.
@@gymnastix no Florida was referring to the the 2000 vote count , not that keneddy was shot in Florida . I think 👍
Now for CBS News with DAN RATHER "NOT TELL TRUTH"
It's fascinating to me that at just 37 seconds into this report, we can see the view from the snipers nest, and how the traffic sign momentarily comes into view in front of the occupants of the car. The current thinking is that Oswald's first shot hit that sign and ricocheted into the kerb causing injury to James Tague. But nobody seems to have realised that at the time.
The fragment that caused an injury to Tague more than likely came from the 3rd and fatal headshot. At the time of the headshot, Tague and the limo were almost in a straight line to the depository and fragments from the headshot hit and damaged the windshield and the chrome above it (also lining up with Tague's position). Tague himself said he wasn't hit by the first shot which is the shot that missed the car.
I have always been suspicious of Ruth Payne. In Geraldo Riveras “Live From Dallas 1988” special, Defense Attorney Gerry Spence, did a superb job of destroying her credibility of befriending the Oswalds..
She didn't seem believable to you?
@@peterfraser9070 I guess she wasn't believable but Geraldo was... lol At least he was suspicious of Ruth Payne and not Ruth Paine.
@@aaronz7056 she seemed believable
@@peterfraser9070 Totally; she innocently befriended Marina and the poor lady has been caught up in "speculation" by conspiracy idiots ever since.
The Paines did have connections to top level CIA people. Then there was the connection with Bell Helicopter company, Walter Dornberger Nazi connection...not exactly your average suburban household 🤔
Allen Dulles and Gerald Ford were signatories of the thing.
At 17:20 Ruthie is asked about helping LHO obtain his TSBD job. They should have asked her why she didn't tell Oswald about a great job offer he received for a job at LOVE FIELD, paying much much more than his TSBD job! Instead she helped him get a crappy, min wage job at the TSBD that was below his intellect. Now why would that be Ruthie? I'm convinced she's CIA just like her sister, Sylvia Hyde Hoke. And remember her mother in law, Ruth Forbes Paine was best friends with former OSS agent, Mary Bancroft, who was the longtime mistress of CIA Director, Allan Dulles! (The CIA Director JFK had just fired for insubordination and criminal activity; and who was later put on the Warren Commission by LBJ!). Instead, Ruthie steered Oswald into his job at the Depository, so the "patsy" would be in place. Whether or not she knew the end result would be him being blamed for the assassination is not known (but I suspect it). However, it is a FACT that she withheld this information about about the much better paying job offer at Love Field!
We had to miss Mr. Ed for this?
I'd like to hear what a modern day "body language" expert makes of the testimonies of the people being interviewed!
The minute most of them start to speak they look down and away from the camera lense, not wanting to look the camera in the eye!
"I'd like to hear what a modern day "body language" expert makes of the testimonies of the people being interviewed!": Here's an analysis of Oswald: "Lee Harvey Oswald: Rare Footage Body Language Analysis".
Please dude, there's already plenty of theories about this hole JFK assassination... Let's not bring pseudoscience into it now.
It would be as close as saying that aliens were involved.
Why bring in junk science?
@@isabellaangeline2175 This is rather interesting: th-cam.com/video/46upt4b5aVA/w-d-xo.html
"body language expert" like CARDI C or WHOOTI GOLDBENZ
Having seen more modern evidence, this is a load of bull he fell back and to the left towards jackie. Lee Harveu Oswald was on the second floor so why was he a suspect and no way do the police identy a suspect that quick. please this is insulting
He was the only person not in work after roll call and after his description was radioed,he was stopped and then killed another ! Before he was arrested they had also on that information raided a local library,bet you didn’t know that…
The Dallas PD, or controlling elements within it, was in on the 'Big Event'!!!!
Tippet was not a random murder, he was set up!!!!
There were witnesses to the Tippet murder,
un-interviewed witnesses.
That 'commission' was bogus from the start.
@@johnsonhunglo1993 How do you approach and recruit the cops on the Dallas P.D. to risk their lives and careers by becoming accessories to murder?
"Controlling elements..." Cops are under no obligation to obey illegal orders to commit serious crimes.
How do the conspirators know there will be a cop driving at 10th and Patton at exactly the right time for Oswald to be plausibly blamed for shooting him? How do they know Oswald will have his gun on him? How do they know where he's going? How do they know he has a handgun anyway? What happens if Tippit outdraws his killer and captures him alive? Why take so many big chances killing Tippit at all when Oswald is already being hunted for Kennedy anyway?
@@aaronz7056 💵
@@aaronz7056 :
Those were/are some very good questions,
most of which have been asked and answered.
You should spend some time researching the origin of cops in the USA.
John F. Kennedy was killed on my son Kelly's second birthday and "9-11" happened on my son Jerry's 45 birthday. I have mentioned that maybe nothing as wrong as these two things will ever happen to "our country" again because I gave birth to only two boys. Their only other sibling was their sister who was born between them.
I believe that this was a 2 man job. Lee Oswald with the gun, another man helping him out somehow. When Oswald was being interviewed, his partner shot and killed him to make sure he didn’t tell any secrets about the assassination to the police.