ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 29 ส.ค. 2017
- Let's take a look at the two new augmented reality platforms: ARKit vs ARCore i.e. iOS vs Android. Shown in the comparison are any noticeable differences in tracking speed and quality. In many senses, they are practically identical. They pretty much have the same features which include, feature point detection, plane detection, anchoring virtual objects to the real world, and world positional tracking! As a reminder, both of these videos were taken during their beta and the SDKs are subject to A LOT of improvement. I cannot wait to play with AR some more!
Welcome to the weekly FusedVR Tutorials! These videos/streams are a chance not only for anyone to learn more about AR/VR development, but also a chance for anyone to ask questions about LITERALLY anything! Whether it be about your own AR/VR development, your future projects, or just AR/VR in general, we would love to talk with you about it!
Suggestions for future streams. Post Here: fusedvr.com
Interested in keeping up to date with the live streams? Follow us on social media or subscribe to the channel!
/ fusedvr
/ fusedvr
/ fusedvr
/ fusedvr
bit.ly/1SZXwtn - วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี
![แม่กลองสองใจ - ซีแกรม โตเกียว มิวสิค [ OFFICIAL MUSIC VIDEO ]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/GSQfVjcr_f4/mqdefault.jpg)
![[LIVE] : ONE ลุมพินี 68 | คู่เอก "พระจันทร์ฉาย vs โจนาธาน"](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/F3IM3w-XchI/mqdefault.jpg)
Awesome! Been looking for a side-by-side comparison... from this, it seems ARCore drifts a bit more? Can you do a light estimation comparison? I tried ARCore with a dimmer last night and was blown away, but not sure how ARKit fares against it... Thanks again for making this!
Yup can do, now I need to dive a little more into the code. But from what I have seen, both do pretty good light estimation.
wow you made this quickly
It was that exciting I had to make it fast haha
So ARKit or ARCore now?
EDIT: I think I finally figured out the why iOS was lagging in the recording. I had run it as a dev build so there was extra logging going on. Sorry about that!
ARCore tutorials please! I am so mad though that Google is treating Nexus 6P like an adopted child. No ARCore support for Nexus 6p yet :(
I spoke with Nathan Martz, PM at Daydream at an event last night and he didn't have a concrete date when other Android devices would be supported.
ARKit looks like it has more stable tracking, and more devices will be using it.
Yup agreed, but I do think AR is definitely a long term play for both companies.
Tutorials coming as fast we can make them haha
AR is definitely a tough problem so I am not sure when they will be able to make it super performant
ARKit !
ARKit has a legup on core, merely on the fact that it's using components that have been fined tuned for years by metaio. Metaio was an old hand at the AR game and they introduced real world object tracking years ago, they were eventually acquired by apple as a part of their big AR play.
True Apple had Meta.io but Google had Tango and I can only imagine that Google had the tech for ARCore a while ago but were looking to do something much more grandiose.
World to Unity position tutorial soon please !!!
which unity version you use to build AR core , unity 2017.2.0b9 ? i take one day to download it but it failed :(
i only have samsung galaxy s7 edge , do you think it can run AR core ? or only s8 and google pixel ?
Will be releasing a tutorial soon that goes over all the setup
s7 can
I wonder who first will release a 'navigator' app that would use AR to show the directions.
my guess is Google inside Google maps ;)
How can I install it?
New video coming today showing how to do that ;)
FusedVR for real? Thank you
It's not that ARcore looses tracking it's just that ARkit let's itself run without camera input at all.
Which is amazing!
ARcore is better at detecting objects and surfaces ARkit is better on blind flight
Have not looked at Arkit in a while but pretty sure it needs the camera to detect features - in theory they are both doing similar things
FusedVR yeah, they are pretty similar what I meant by don't need camera input is after getting some first features.
Arcore will make the entire holographic world disappear about 1 second after it loses the point cloud visual.
Yet ARkit will run tens of seconds without any visual at all.
Try using air measures in path drawing mode and you'll see that it keeps tracking even without camera.
Could you remake this with the iOS record lag solved?
if there is enough demand I can
Plzz
arcore seems smoother
ARCore tutorial
Coming soon!
most importantly, the reliability is with huge difference
Both are 20 years behind holotoolkit and hololens
Thats fair, but neither has access to a depth camera so there is that
Is ARKit slower than ARCore? Or iPhone 7 slower than S8? Or is it just the recording?
just the recording. they both look fine on device
can i get arcore on my apple 6 ?
thats a difference caused by hardwares
I still don't see a practical and day to day way to use AR. Seems like a gadget, a cool one, but gadget.
a very valid point and I am on board with you here. That said, I think the technology will only get better over time and this gets the ball started on thinking about it.
I hope so, but I think it will be better for professionals, we'll see pretty fast
Here's a legitimate use: let's say you're looking at something you need to take apart. Point your phone/AR glasses at it, click a virtual button, and bam, you're now looking at an exploded view of the thing. Or seeing a disassembly tutorial.
I can think of almost unlimited uses for AR in terms of instructional demonstrations, let alone the sheer novelty of being able to get extra information about things around you. I already have a bad habit of endlessly googling stuff I don't really need to read about, this would be like that times a hundred.
DeepState, don't be a dick. You sound like a self-righteous prick. Maybe try phrasing your comments in a less antagonistic way that doesn't make it sound like you think the entire world revolves around you (a random person on the internet that nobody actually cares about, oh the irony).
Speaking of irony, obviously "your" not a master of the English language, Mr "Engineer." Just goes to show that you don't have to be able to construct coherent sentences in order to get an engineering degree. Good for you, and all your learning disabilities!
I can see a few, robot localization and navigation, Drones , 6DOF VR apps, AR navigation
Arkit forever
If ARkit is better than ARCore, Tango will still be miles above both.
true, but not everyone has such devices at the moment. cannot wait for the day that comes out for a lot of people
Hololens already made that technology avalible to the public. Not cheap, but still possible. In reality Tango is a far more successful project but Hololens reveals far less errors and better functionality than Tango. ARCore and ARKit in my opinion are only good for head tracking and motion tracking to enable movement in a VR environment. It still is fundamentally behind in its algorithms to enable objects to exist within a simulated space. Leapmotion is currently the greatest innovation for this type of technology if we master how to track motion on mobile devices, then we could REALLY get "Hands on" with our projects (ba-dum tush!)
Tango appeared to work much smoother than Hololens. Hololens has progressed quite a bit, but it still looks very glitchy while Tango demos consistently looked quite seamless. It's really too bad Google killed it, Tango is AR done correctly. Those sensors may add to the cost of the hardware and limit the number of devices it can be used on, but I think they're absolutely necessary to provide a legitimate quality AR experience. I would not be surprised to see someone (if not Google) bring it back and release a device that contains similar technology in order to recreate that experience.
It really appears to me, from all the demos I've seen, that those depth sensors really make a big difference in the ability to scan and detect the surrounding environment. Please correct and enlighten me if I'm wrong, but to my eyes, Tango at its best looked better than Hololens at its best. Tango could do some darn impressive things.
it's absolutely the same it's a stupid software doing monocular visual odometry .....which has been around for more than 10 years and is the bare minimum for inside out tracking and scanning......at least pretty soon all phones will have tango like sensors including the ipotato
I cannot wait for Tango hardware to be a lot more widely adopted! But for now this is the next best thing that will be available to millions.
RIP Tango. Too bad, Tango looked WAY better than either of these.
I guess they will now kill off the Tango completely? Shame really because possibility wise it was years ahead this arkitcore nonsense :(
It is really interesting. To make an ARCore application in Unity, you need to enable "Tango support". Not sure what that means though
arkit/arcore is the equivalent of super crappy vga phone camera ......tango is the equivalent of modern powerful dual lens camera with all the bells and whistles ......nothing is getting killed off
Apple bought the company Google partnered with to make Tango... ( The vision-based software partner for “Project Tango)
techcrunch.com/2016/01/29/apple-furthers-its-vr-plans-with-acquisition-of-flyby-media-makers-of-tech-that-sees-the-world-around-you/
RIP Tango.