Welcome to a comparison between two giants of modern agriculture: the John Deere X9 1100 and the Claas Lexion 8900 working on the wheat field. Let's take a look at the specifications, strengths and areas for improvement of both machines to see which is the best choice for you.
Designers who are loyal to producing profits for the company always deliver different solutions for each problem to be solved within agriculture. They are not capable of designing a machine that can be assembled with different components to develop different agricultural tasks, for example, to cut the pact, they present you with a machine to spray, another machine to anger another machine and so on. There is no machine that they design in which one can compare different parts for different tasks because the reason is obvious. If they develop a single machine that one can assemble for different types of work, it is not a business for them.
There is no machine that they design in which one can compare different parts for different tasks because the reason is obvious. Yes, I agree with you on this issue. But this is just a comparison for farmers to have a choice when they are considering between 2 machine lines.
With so many years of experience in the manufacture of agricultural machinery, the only thing that increases is the price, but the benefits are still basically the same. They do not have heat in the front or how to incorporate a machine in the front, they still do not install rear cameras. None of the tractors have to turn their heads 180 degrees every 5 minutes, which causes muscle problems. The tractor seats, when dragging so much machinery, still do not turn 180 degrees with a guide system that can be handled in such a way that they can see the machinery that is attached without losing control or control. They specialize in only changing the format and paint of the machines, which are the same ones that they have always been selling, and to top it off, those tiny little screens that the machine has to work hard to see the numbers or letters, being able to place large screens on which the machine does not have work, even when seeing that screen, always small screens.
Yes, you right, bút If your requirements are met, the price of each harvesting machine will increase significantly. Think about it? How many people will be willing to buy a machine with such a high price?
to pay a million dollars there is nothing new it should have at least side cameras rear camera built-in baler a table not of 13.5 but of 20 meters double double double absorption capacity double double internal cylinders to divide the straw in two and subject them to the necessary revolutions automatic or remote driving at 100% tires in a different row one of us this is that the rear and the front ones do not go in the same line to increase the compaction of the ground when a machine has that and with all the years of experience in the construction of machinery they cannot do that but they can ask for a million dollars or $800,000 plus taxes which is a million
I see you have a lot of experience using a combine harvester. How long have you been driving a combine harvester? What brand of machine are you driving?
Buying John's machines is a bad business. After 5 years the price has dropped dramatically, with the market losing at least 50% to 60 to 70 percent. This means that they only have a useful life of 4 years, in line with the price.
I read your comment. You said: After 5 years the price has dropped significantly, but how do you see the quality of John Deere machines? Has it dropped as much as other machines?
Obsolescence is a serious problem with machinery. Once the factory warranty has ended, countless failures appear, increasing costs day by day due to not using the machinery and paying mechanical technicians to solve the problem. The spare parts are sold to customers as if they were unknown. They do not give any kind of discount. They do not make any kind of consideration for why they invested hundreds of thousands of dollars. It is a brand that is based only on those old machines and at some point they gave some delivery. Nothing new, it is just marketing.
Welcome to a comparison between two giants of modern agriculture: the John Deere X9 1100 and the Claas Lexion 8900 working on the wheat field. Let's take a look at the specifications, strengths and areas for improvement of both machines to see which is the best choice for you.
Thank you for creating such an entertaining video!
Thanks for watching this video
Don't forget to like and subscribe my channel. Thank you 😁
The way you manage your farm is so inspiring
Thank you very much. do you farm too?
I admire your commitment to living a sustainable lifestyle
what is it? I do not understand? but anyway thank you for watching my video.
Love the way you’re enjoying the process
@@LyThiHangDailyLife Thank you. What do you do to get so many big fruits? do you sell?
Can't get enough of your videos! 😊
See you
This video was absolutely hilarious. I loved it!
Thank you, i'm glad it helps others
Designers who are loyal to producing profits for the company always deliver different solutions for each problem to be solved within agriculture. They are not capable of designing a machine that can be assembled with different components to develop different agricultural tasks, for example, to cut the pact, they present you with a machine to spray, another machine to anger another machine and so on. There is no machine that they design in which one can compare different parts for different tasks because the reason is obvious. If they develop a single machine that one can assemble for different types of work, it is not a business for them.
There is no machine that they design in which one can compare different parts for different tasks because the reason is obvious.
Yes, I agree with you on this issue. But this is just a comparison for farmers to have a choice when they are considering between 2 machine lines.
Have a look at the nexat
Have a look at the nexat
@@sebastiensabiote7416 what, where is nexat?
Just look on TH-cam. That’s what you guys were talking about
With so many years of experience in the manufacture of agricultural machinery, the only thing that increases is the price, but the benefits are still basically the same. They do not have heat in the front or how to incorporate a machine in the front, they still do not install rear cameras. None of the tractors have to turn their heads 180 degrees every 5 minutes, which causes muscle problems. The tractor seats, when dragging so much machinery, still do not turn 180 degrees with a guide system that can be handled in such a way that they can see the machinery that is attached without losing control or control. They specialize in only changing the format and paint of the machines, which are the same ones that they have always been selling, and to top it off, those tiny little screens that the machine has to work hard to see the numbers or letters, being able to place large screens on which the machine does not have work, even when seeing that screen, always small screens.
Yes, you right, bút If your requirements are met, the price of each harvesting machine will increase significantly. Think about it? How many people will be willing to buy a machine with such a high price?
CLAAS . the best.
Are you a Claas harvester sales or operator?
to pay a million dollars there is nothing new it should have at least side cameras rear camera built-in baler a table not of 13.5 but of 20 meters double double double absorption capacity double double internal cylinders to divide the straw in two and subject them to the necessary revolutions automatic or remote driving at 100% tires in a different row one of us this is that the rear and the front ones do not go in the same line to increase the compaction of the ground when a machine has that and with all the years of experience in the construction of machinery they cannot do that but they can ask for a million dollars or $800,000 plus taxes which is a million
I see you have a lot of experience using a combine harvester. How long have you been driving a combine harvester? What brand of machine are you driving?
Buying John's machines is a bad business. After 5 years the price has dropped dramatically, with the market losing at least 50% to 60 to 70 percent. This means that they only have a useful life of 4 years, in line with the price.
I read your comment.
You said: After 5 years the price has dropped significantly,
but how do you see the quality of John Deere machines? Has it dropped as much as other machines?
Obsolescence is a serious problem with machinery. Once the factory warranty has ended, countless failures appear, increasing costs day by day due to not using the machinery and paying mechanical technicians to solve the problem. The spare parts are sold to customers as if they were unknown. They do not give any kind of discount. They do not make any kind of consideration for why they invested hundreds of thousands of dollars. It is a brand that is based only on those old machines and at some point they gave some delivery. Nothing new, it is just marketing.
And Both machines are currently in production.
omg
@@MocMoc-ks2ks what is wrong?