2023 Toyota Yaris 1.5 VVT-i (125 PS) TEST DRIVE
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 9 ก.พ. 2025
- 2023 Toyota Yaris 1.5 VVT-i
92 KW / 123 HP / 125 PS
1.5L Petrol Gasoline Engine
1490 cm3 / 90.9 CUI
3-Cylinder
153 Nm / 112 ft-lb
6-Speed Manual
TEST DRIVE
Interior & Cockpit Design
Exterior Design
Driving & Sound / POV
Computer & Entertaiment on Board
Light Night Design
Fuel Consumption from 100 to 180 kmh (62 to 112 mph)
Acceleration 0-180 kmh
Top Speed German Autobahn
Car is actually pretty good
My driving school had a 2021 Yaris manual identical if not the same to yours,and it was pretty sick
素敵な車 🇯🇵
Do you like this car?
No
@@yusufmercan3494 best car on its category hands down!!!
Yes
🐢
can you please share whats the fuel economy of this car on city and on long routes
@TEST DRIVE FREAK
Really nice video.
I would like to ask you if the fuel consumption at 100, 120, 140, 160 km was with a.c or not
And I would like a consumption in the city
Thanks
thank you for nice comment, i think it was with A/C on. with city fuel consumption we didnt test it. but with hybrid you will get around 3-4 liter in city. i think with this you will get 6-8 liter it depends how city is with traffic and many stop and go
I bought a Hilux instead. Much more fun to travel with people and have my friends with me, sitting comfortably, and have all the stuff we want with us
I have one beside the shell off the car she is nice 👍🏽
Von der Beschleunigung hätte ich objektiv mehr erwartet. Der Verbrauch ist bis 140 km/h recht niedrig. Das Fahrzeugkonzept an sich ist stimmig. Allerdings könnte das Platzangebot besser sein und die Sitze mehr Beinauflage haben. Insgesamt ist das Preisniveau, speziell für einen Kleinwagen recht hoch. Leider ist der legendäre 1.4 D-4D Diesel mit 90PS/205Nm nicht mehr im Angebot. Er sticht den 125PS Benziner aus und ist für Pendler auf Langstrecken vom Verbrauch her unschlagbar.
beschleunigung war ok, bei autobahn ab ca 150 kmh hat er etwas mühe trotz 125 PS finde ich zu wenig, leider ist er bei 187-188 kmh abgeregelt und würde lieber offen haben und soll locker 195-200 kmh erreichen. Verbrauch war ok. Fahrqualität und lenkung echt super, sitze und comfort könnte etwas besser sein.
Geh mal auf die Websites von anderen Herstellern und konfiguriere Konkurrenten mit VERGLEICHBARER Aussstattung...
@@Mgoblagulkablong Das stimmt leider. Allein was der Polo in der Basis kostet und locker auf 30K getrieben werden kann. In einem Vergleichstest mit 110PS, Automatik und drei Ausstattungspaketen standen 32.000€ auf dem Zettel.
Das Teil kostet in der Basis schon über 20.000, in dieser Ausstattung wahrscheinlich 25.. Puh, was rechtfertigt diesen Preis? .. vor allem, wenn im Interieur dann wirklich ausnahmslos alles aus Hartplastik ist un
Geh mal auf die Websites von anderen Herstellern und konfiguriere Konkurrenten mit VERGLEICHBARER Aussstattung...
...und ein Zylinder fehlt?
@@TheCrankshaftRotator Das find ich nicht mal störend, ich persönlich mag 3-Zylinder, sie haben Charakter und einen schönen Sound. Fand nur, dass man für den Preis wenigstens eine etwas bessere Materialanmutung erwarten darf
@@enfantterrible4868 Mir laufen die viel zu unrund, vor allem bei sparsamer Fahrweise, welche ich fast immer praktiziere.
@@TheCrankshaftRotator ist ja Geschmackssache 👍
Hi sir it's says audi in your description
Ohh, thanks, just fixed
this vehicle are incredibly expensive for its size,hp,equipment...., basically few years ago you could get Toyota Avensis for similar price
That is the case for most cars nowadays unfortunately...
Hervorragend gemacht. Verbrauch finde ich angemessen. 6 Liter Verbrauch wohl realistisch.
Mehr Komfort für den Einstieg bot mir der Suzuki Ignis Hybrid. Nicht so sportlich aber günstig in Steuer und Versicherung.
Fährt mit 83ps auch 172 kmh GPS bereinigt.
Hybrid System hilft in der City.
I can see "SHIFT" on the left. You were using the 5.th unstead the 6.th gear, which makes the fuel consumption test worthless.
its displayed all the time "SHIFT" if there is with arrow up i have to shift. look at acceleration part it displayed shift all the time and you can see there with arrow
@@TESTDRIVEFREAK But the engine rpm looks like 5th gear also. Sure, you were in the 6th gear?
@@TheCrankshaftRotator I thought the same, but have a look at the acceleration part. It will show an arrow upwards (triangle above SHIFT) when it wants you to shift, while it does not show this in the fuel consumption part.
@@TheCrankshaftRotator Acceleration part: 5th gear, 185 km/h, > 5500 rpm.
Fuel consumption part: 2500 rpm @ 100 km/h, 3000 rpm @ 120 km/h, 3500 rpm @ 140 km/h.
Don't be lazy.
@@ManiPulatoR84 Yes, that´s right, I calculated right now (6 th gear 0,66, axle 4,21, wheels 1,88 meters) = 2460 rpm at 6 th gear / 100 kmh. But why I can see "shift" on the display?
Tam jest limiter szybkości?
187-188 kmh limiter
Joyful engine but gears seem to be settled long
Efficiency
@@ShiftingGears92 I know 👍
if you take the reference point of 6000 rpm, the gearbox is calculated for typical N/a petrol engines from the mid 90's - mid 00's (1.6 - 1.8l)...
تقريبا نفس محرك الكورولا ثلاث اسطوانات اللي ينزل بالسعودية
consumption pretty high considering size of vehicle and hp
Ni idea tienes
Consumption is pretty low considering it's a gasoline engine and it has to fight the air resistance like every other car.
@@sic22l its higher then of bigger and more heavy cars such as audi 4 or bmw 3 with 2 liters engines and 150&156hp!!
@@Mr11ESSE111 Not really higher, similar. Similar air drag, similar consumption. Not to mention that Yaris has a classic naturally aspirated engine without fancy fuel saving technologies. I'm not suprised by the results.
@@sic22l yes really higher by alot especially on higher speeds ,several litres higher and Yaris are few hundreds kg lighter and Yaris are pretty slow here considering hp again and size and weight of it and price overall are not something low of this Yaris
The "correct" version is with an automatic cvt transmission, which unfolds the engine's talents to 100%
with cvt are bigger garbage then with manual and its 2000-4000 euro more costly too
If being slower while using more fuel you can call a talent then yes.
@@sic22l its not slower nor using more fuel lol. It keeps the engine at optimum rpm in addition to using electric motors. So while accelerating it has more 'average horsepower' because the engine does not have to rev up/down and it uses electric power.
Only annoying thing is when you're not used to the engine staying at the same rpm because you're used at the rpm goes up with the speed so you automatically think that you're not accelerating because the sound stays the same. (yes its a long sentence, yes im german lol)
@@qwertz4035 We're not talking about a hybrid but this naturally aspirated engine mated with a classic CVT.
lmao there isn't a worse autotragic than a CVT
Berbat
한국차보다는 일본차가 좋지