Speed of light in non inertial frame

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 17 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 171

  • @sanketpatil6711
    @sanketpatil6711 5 ปีที่แล้ว +86

    2:44
    He says "I don't understand much"..
    Shows his intense humbleness....
    What a great personality he is..!!

  • @Mahesh_Shenoy
    @Mahesh_Shenoy 5 ปีที่แล้ว +66

    What I love about him is, his explanation seems so honest!. Unlike most professors I have seen, he doesn't use fancy words and act as if it's something everybody should know out. He calls out that words like Flat and curved are pretty abstract and that even he doesn't understand it. Such words feel very encouraging if you find it difficult to grasp these concepts.

    • @shang_chi4651
      @shang_chi4651 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      i totally agree with you and apreciate the fact that you understand him so well and the way you have described him is just exceptional

  • @beeta108_kartikkumarathani9
    @beeta108_kartikkumarathani9 6 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    YOUR BOOK MAKES MY PHYSICS BASIC CONCEPTS CRYSTAL CLEAR & STRONG

  • @JoanLeonardoDuarteBernal
    @JoanLeonardoDuarteBernal ปีที่แล้ว

    Great answer, I am reading a book about how Einstein created general relativity, and this question indeed was one of his inspirations for his new theory. Thank you, this answer helped me to undertand this subject better.

  • @Jujubizin
    @Jujubizin 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    The faint smile on his face through the entire video really conveys how much passion this professor has for physics. It seems to bring such a joy to him, that honestly, I'm jealous.

  • @HashBiker
    @HashBiker 6 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    your contribution to society is par excellence , keep it up sir

  • @asifeqbal2199
    @asifeqbal2199 5 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    Sir you are genius.Your physics is still my favourite book.

    • @AnkitYadav-hp2ki
      @AnkitYadav-hp2ki 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      undoubtedly,Sir is genius but the concept of physics is super overrated book

    • @ankityadav7712
      @ankityadav7712 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      It should not be your favorite book

  • @alokverma3311
    @alokverma3311 6 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Kya baat hai sir...nice... this little bit explanation about GTR is awesome
    My favourite prof. In world

  • @ritikkumar6245
    @ritikkumar6245 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I am in science college but I prefer ur lecture than my professor

  • @babansahani9286
    @babansahani9286 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    You are best sir apka lectures se very very help ho raha h thanku so much

  • @dineshpurbiya
    @dineshpurbiya 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Shandaar Sir.

  • @anninova
    @anninova 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Mazaa aagaya sir !

  • @himanshuvyas3706
    @himanshuvyas3706 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    That is very well explained sir...one doubt if anyone can help. The change in time, or the time dilation that we are talking here in a strong gravitational field, isn't that itself came from the fact that speed of light is constant?

    • @AmanDeep-yc4iz
      @AmanDeep-yc4iz 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hope it helps

    • @himanshuvyas3706
      @himanshuvyas3706 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@AmanDeep-yc4iz Thanks bro...I'll try to understand it

    • @AmanDeep-yc4iz
      @AmanDeep-yc4iz 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Actually I read your question once again.. you're right
      Under strong gravitational field time dilation occurs and in general we express it in terms of
      T(moving)=gamma×T(stationary).we can derive this by assuming two postulates of G.relativity. speed of an object is relative and c is the fastest speed for anything in the universe.Time depends ,it speeds up or slows down according to our speeds...but it also speed up of slows down according to the force which we experience due to gravity.....
      The first case is general relativity
      And the second one is special relativity. I don't know why but somehow c,t,g are related.

    • @AmanDeep-yc4iz
      @AmanDeep-yc4iz 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You can watch Fermi lab series on relativity ...it has helped me to understand it - somewhat...he is a source you can trust and don't forget Carl Sagan..his explanation are awesome.

    • @himanshuvyas3706
      @himanshuvyas3706 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@AmanDeep-yc4iz yeah bro..thanks for explaining😎

  • @srimathivijayakumar1466
    @srimathivijayakumar1466 ปีที่แล้ว

    Greetings sir. It is very kind of you to answer all our doubts and everything, so much grateful to you. I have a question sir if space and time is a same side of a coin if the space changes accordingly time also changes right sir! If that is so the accordingly changes doesn't be balanced to keep the speed of light a Constant one in non inertial frame sir?
    Thank you for your valuable time sir

  • @harshpratapsingh310
    @harshpratapsingh310 5 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Sir, Your explanation is really fantastic...
    But I am having a question - Light comes to Earth by travelling from sun and distance from the sun to the Earth cannot be said as local distance in space-time as it is a quite large distance but still we are defining velocity of light to be constant over such a large distance. So, what can be the explanation to this fact?

    • @abhaypratapsingh1579
      @abhaypratapsingh1579 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      The ether is nothing, speed does not depend on distance and there is a phase when light changes it's speed after getting into earth's atmosphere it just a constant in a certain atmos

    • @abhaypratapsingh1579
      @abhaypratapsingh1579 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      As answer to your question lies between dillema of earth is a inertial frame or not. It is inertial as it revolves around the sun with constant velo. But due to its rotation over axis produces centripetal acceleration it is non inertial so your answer lies between this

    • @darkseid856
      @darkseid856 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Speed of light is constant in vaccum.

    • @physicsdemonstrations2426
      @physicsdemonstrations2426 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      There is weak gravitational limit. Since earth is not as compact for general relativistic effects to be significant we can assume the spacetime around earth to be flat to a certain degree of approx. In this locally flat spacetime the speed of light is c. If u were on a blackhole this assumption would be invalid as the spacetime near blackhole is highly curved spacetime.

    • @WajidKhan-ps4ck
      @WajidKhan-ps4ck 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      As the curvature increases in space time the time dilation occure and the distance become larger for light to travel
      Here at the same time distance increase and also time increase in the same amount so the value of speed become constant

  • @teerathrajsharma8842
    @teerathrajsharma8842 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Sir how can we say that light speed is constant

  • @akashchandrayan7255
    @akashchandrayan7255 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    But light would still travel shortest path in the curved space..

  • @bipinmaurya3824
    @bipinmaurya3824 6 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Sir you are legend of iit

  • @tusharranjan7264
    @tusharranjan7264 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Professor lets imagine that i had divided the spacetime into very small scales of dx and dt so that for each division there is no change in length scale and time scale now all i need to do is to add all the small length scale and time scale, calculate the errors and i have founded velocity in any direction and can also calculate acceleration can this work for both
    inertial and non inertial frames plz reply

    • @vishesh5492
      @vishesh5492 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      No we don't know how space and time is changing we need a relation or function to integrate

    • @_rajat02_10
      @_rajat02_10 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@vishesh5492 Couldn't agree more👏

    • @akashtiwari6681
      @akashtiwari6681 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      But quantum mechanics does not agree , because firstly you difine ,how the space made form

  • @gaonkemaje6060
    @gaonkemaje6060 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Sir then how we will explain time deletion
    Light speed should be const in non inertial frame

  • @RajivKumar-xb7nr
    @RajivKumar-xb7nr 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Awesome sir

  • @teerathrajsharma8842
    @teerathrajsharma8842 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Kya wastab m time hota h ya ensano ke dwara ye banaya gaya h agar ensaan time ko mapne ke liye koi ekai banata hi nahi to time kase hota?

    • @athvii
      @athvii 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Bruh..Go and learn Special Theory of Relativity!

  • @adityaroy2375
    @adityaroy2375 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Sir please make the concept clear of what is the meaning of constant k in F=kma. And also make me understand what is the meaning of constant in physic. Please tell me earlier because I am not able to study effectively. Please help me sir. 😔😔

    • @chandrikaprasad6513
      @chandrikaprasad6513 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Here K is unit force whose value is 1 constant in physics is its value never changes

  • @Photon1345
    @Photon1345 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    As proposed in the video that a frame can or can not have a gravitational field... hmmm but isn't it true that fields are always present in the 3+1 dimensions, they are part of spacetime itself? So a frame without a field needs to be outside the spacetime itself. Anyways any measurement of speed will be instantaneous and since EM waves don't require any medium to travel though, there isn't any relative relationship between the speed of EM waves from different frames, it will always be 'c' regardless of the frame's properties.

  • @nirajniroula3843
    @nirajniroula3843 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Sir travelling with speed of light contracts space length and dilates the time.cant we take this fact to make speed of light constant both in inertial and noninertial frame?

    • @megametagrossard3342
      @megametagrossard3342 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeah but the point is that, those Lorentz transformations for curved spacetime are not linear, so you can't use them. It's like if you have a second degree polynomial, and you ask what is the rate of change from x=1 to x=10. That question doesn't mean anything because for a non-linear function, the rate of change is continuously different for every real value of x...

  • @vidushitandon8919
    @vidushitandon8919 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Sir if the velocity is not c is it more than c or less than c?If it is more than c won't Einstein contradict his own statement that "nothing travels faster than light". If somehow this is achievable then will we be able to accelerate things beyond the speed of light?

    • @akashtiwari6681
      @akashtiwari6681 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Every object have masses the real enisten equation is E^2=(mc^2)^2+(pc) ^2 if you put m= 0 then you achive light of speed

    • @akashtiwari6681
      @akashtiwari6681 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I know the universe expanding with c^2 but we don't know about dark matter and dark energy

  • @TheRetirementRoadmap
    @TheRetirementRoadmap 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Mind blowing

  • @amantyagi9792
    @amantyagi9792 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Why is spacetime curved by mass but not charge?

    • @VishalKumar-bi6ci
      @VishalKumar-bi6ci 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It is curved by mass of the charge

    • @VishalKumar-bi6ci
      @VishalKumar-bi6ci 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@alapandas6398 Because electric field and magnetic field needs a net charge on the body

  • @nandishnan5680
    @nandishnan5680 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    why should we assume that time changes with curved space and not speed of the light? I understand that time at different space is different, but why should speed of light be constant and not time.
    Light traveling point a to point b on curved space will take same amount of time for light traveling from point a to point b on flat space. Here the explanation is time is slower on curved space, but my question is, why is it so, why cant we treat time as constant and say speed of light varies according to curvature of the space?

    • @pfft3158
      @pfft3158 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      My answer may sound bizarre but don't blame a 10th grader. If you look at the time period formula, it's inversely proportional to acceleration due to gravity ( Too lazy to break my head ). Acceleration due to gravity depends on Gravity which curves space....so yeah. I guess you got my point.
      There is an equation to calculate *Time* *Dilation* . Google it if you wanna break your head.

    • @fool4530
      @fool4530 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Its just an assumption which is started by maxwell and continued to relativity by einstein that the light of speed is observer independent.
      And the results predicted by relativity matched with experiments.
      However,it is not proven.

  • @teerathrajsharma8842
    @teerathrajsharma8842 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Agar ham har gati ko kisi ke saapeksh mante h to light ki speed ko kisi ke saapeksh kyu nahi ?

  • @lovelyvloggs
    @lovelyvloggs 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Love u sirji

  • @theimmortalphysicsmaths3962
    @theimmortalphysicsmaths3962 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Sir..If speed of light is constant so how refraction occurs ???

    • @waraulhasan2477
      @waraulhasan2477 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Speed of light is constant in relative motions not in the case when it passes a denser medium. It's speed slows down in denser medium, that's why refraction occurs.

  • @abhayjaiswal9836
    @abhayjaiswal9836 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This question began relativity😎

    • @athvii
      @athvii 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I think you didn't heard about Gallielian Relativity

  • @ManjuDevi-sv2nk
    @ManjuDevi-sv2nk 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Is light is also affected by gravity?

    • @AdarshKumar-dq5wy
      @AdarshKumar-dq5wy 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yes at black holes

    • @darkseid856
      @darkseid856 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yes gravity affects light.

    • @shivangsrivastava6024
      @shivangsrivastava6024 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yes bro light of stars is curved
      due to space time curvature

    • @What-is-Mind
      @What-is-Mind 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yup because it has mass in motion

  • @theisiciean1325
    @theisiciean1325 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Sir, kindly clear my concept on the limit of Galaxy...

    • @akashtiwari6681
      @akashtiwari6681 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      The only concept this is Limitless

  • @TheRetirementRoadmap
    @TheRetirementRoadmap 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Sir they say light has momentum but how can something massless can have momentum?

    • @rudranshsharma6255
      @rudranshsharma6255 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Light is made up of photons or quanta. Which are just the packets of energy They don't have mass. The momentum that we define for them is due to the energy they carry. So, the momentum of light is due to Energy and not mass itself.

    • @TheRetirementRoadmap
      @TheRetirementRoadmap 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@rudranshsharma6255 what about p=mv

    • @rudranshsharma6255
      @rudranshsharma6255 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@TheRetirementRoadmap Quantum physics bro.. E=mc^2
      E = (mc)*c
      E = P* C
      (P = momentum and C = speed of light )

  • @ayushitihash6045
    @ayushitihash6045 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I am very much interested to learn physics and do some research and advanced and deep study of physics and want to make our Bharat more advanced in science and technology.

  • @funonly7841
    @funonly7841 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    All time great...

  • @Shreysoldier
    @Shreysoldier 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Can it be greater than c?

  • @thoughtfloat
    @thoughtfloat 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Earth has gravity
    That means we are also in non-inertial frame?

    • @sonugagankarn
      @sonugagankarn 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      No brother.... Although the direction of Earth is changing, but it's rotation tends to zero. Hence acceleration of Earth is considered to be zero. So, we are considered generally in inertial frame.

    • @thoughtfloat
      @thoughtfloat 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@sonugagankarn
      Thanks
      Oh acceleration is constant
      😊

  • @pradheepapushparaj4405
    @pradheepapushparaj4405 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    What will be the object looks if it is kept at 0 kelvin

    • @Saurabh.Sharma
      @Saurabh.Sharma 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Freezed

    • @darkseid856
      @darkseid856 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      At absolute zero temperature Pauli's Exclusion Principle fails.
      That is at this temperature atoms will not move relative to each other and all the atoms will clump/group together and will be in the same energy level as if they are a single atom.

  • @jimitsoni18
    @jimitsoni18 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I knew that space-time bends but I want to know in that manner does it bend

  • @LearningwithRizwan8452
    @LearningwithRizwan8452 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    fantastic Sir👍

  • @AnujKumar-sx6ws
    @AnujKumar-sx6ws 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    You didn't answered how or why light speed seems constant even if our velocity changes

  • @ubaiditoo4471
    @ubaiditoo4471 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    You are best sir
    ❤❤❤

  • @udittatisar5336
    @udittatisar5336 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Sir sunne me to bohot achha laga par samajh me jyada kuch nahi aaya

  • @teerathrajsharma8842
    @teerathrajsharma8842 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Time kaha se aaya sir😔 koi bata do plss

  • @abhaypratapsingh1579
    @abhaypratapsingh1579 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sir can u say something on what is our speed with respect to light

    • @deepthakur14916
      @deepthakur14916 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Depends on if you are at rest or moving,
      * If at rest then your speed wrt light is same as speed of light
      *If your are moving then your speed wrt light is (V - C) ,where V is your speed and C is speed of light
      note it is a vector subtraction

    • @abhaypratapsingh1579
      @abhaypratapsingh1579 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      So speed of light is not constant as well

    • @deepthakur14916
      @deepthakur14916 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@abhaypratapsingh1579 speed of light wrt to a observer at rest or moving with a constant velocity is constant

    • @abhaypratapsingh1579
      @abhaypratapsingh1579 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      But when I said I am moving with a constant velocity

    • @abhaypratapsingh1579
      @abhaypratapsingh1579 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Assume I am having acceleration then even light will be constant

  • @Genie890
    @Genie890 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Even a non inertial frame has a particular velocity at any given instant. So momentarily the non inertial frame is identical to some inertial frame which matches this velocity. next instant the non inertial frame has a different velocity.... but there exist another inertial frame that again matches this new velocity and therefore identical to the non inertial one. 😂So instant by instant we can think of the nonertial frame as inertial frame only. And in each of these inertial frame the speed of light is c the universal constant. So collectively even the observer of a non inertial frame will also see the speed of light as c... no need to think of gravity or General relativity here.

  • @AyushSingh-mn8ed
    @AyushSingh-mn8ed 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    1 course we want on general relativity

  • @aftabrana5993
    @aftabrana5993 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    sir mery question ka jawab ni mila

  • @tarushtandon530
    @tarushtandon530 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    But can it ever be greater than c in a non inertial frame?

    • @jatinderkaur7993
      @jatinderkaur7993 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Tarush Tandon as he said the shortest distance in gravitational field is curved so longer than even a straight line. Approximating or taking limit will also result in a different scale

    • @tarushtandon530
      @tarushtandon530 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks shehraj singh

  • @sreekrishnas0514
    @sreekrishnas0514 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    earth is also a non inertial frame

  • @abhaysinhzala1394
    @abhaysinhzala1394 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    sir your explanation was fabulous, but I have one question that "If I travel at the speed of light and the light wave from the sun is also traveling with me, what is the speed of light with respect to me?"

  • @omkarshete2189
    @omkarshete2189 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Sir how I can contact with you ....plz

  • @raghunathkar398
    @raghunathkar398 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sir please upload the topic de sittar relativity

  • @nikolatesla1855
    @nikolatesla1855 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I'm in 10th now, and I'm sure it's not for my brain 🧠😬

    • @pfft3158
      @pfft3158 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Your comment is *IRONIC*

    • @virendra678
      @virendra678 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@pfft3158 how ??

  • @sayansecular8604
    @sayansecular8604 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank u sir..

  • @sudhanshutiwari1102
    @sudhanshutiwari1102 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Sir you say that in non inertial frame the velocity of light can not be defined
    So the gravitational force is everywhere
    It's because of any mass
    Then where can be the inertial frame possible

    • @vysakhk
      @vysakhk 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      0g can be obtained even on earth by using various setups. That can be considered as an inertial frame of reference

  • @shubhamjanagal7090
    @shubhamjanagal7090 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Sir answer to Mila nhi😒😒

    • @shubhamjanagal7090
      @shubhamjanagal7090 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Plz reply anyone

    • @chandrakantasarkar7556
      @chandrakantasarkar7556 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@shubhamjanagal7090 u haven't heard it carefully sir said it is not possible to define speed for a long interval of time.since it has no definite answer

  • @priyankatiwari9291
    @priyankatiwari9291 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sir, why gravitational potential energy is negative

  • @physicsforallparvathamsati3936
    @physicsforallparvathamsati3936 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Iam feeling that u r books are so difficult. Include more basics from ground level please.

  • @ramk5782
    @ramk5782 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Unbelievable...

  • @sanju2780
    @sanju2780 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sir, how can I show this in mathematical form??

    • @harshsaheewala6841
      @harshsaheewala6841 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      For this you need to know
      Tensor calculus and differential geometry

  • @black_jack_meghav
    @black_jack_meghav 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks sir

  • @kaustubhsharma193
    @kaustubhsharma193 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Yeah... Actually due to gravitational force.. This huge fabric of cosmos, I.e.,spacetime bends... More the mass, more is the warping of space... And interestingly we can also pop the spacetime up by using negative mass

  • @rohitmadaan8885
    @rohitmadaan8885 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Space like, time like,light like interval read about these three terms guy's

  • @sanketpatil6711
    @sanketpatil6711 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excited for 15 August

  • @pargatsarao4545
    @pargatsarao4545 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Legend

  • @nishantbhardwaj9658
    @nishantbhardwaj9658 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Lovely.

  • @vtanpy1533
    @vtanpy1533 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Anyone from IIT?

  • @ravigupta5191
    @ravigupta5191 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sir, maybe you should try talking to spiritual enlightened masters...
    They say space-time is really experiential in nature.
    If we pay attention to macroscopic changes on cosmic level, the changes seem to be at a less frequent pace with respect to time while if we observe changes at microscopic level, the frequency of changes is very high.
    Let's suppose we take a point to travel on the sine curve of changes happening at microscopic, macroscopic and cosmic level.
    The point will seem to move fast on the sine curve of microscopic sine curve line because of high frequency.
    If we observe the same on cosmic level the wave length of sine curve is huge, so the point on sine wave curve which may seem to be slow because of lower frequency will actually be high fast speed because of the big cosmic size at which we are dealing.
    If we observe the changes in our macroscopic observable world, the size is less but frequency higher than that of cosmic level and, the size of changes is more but less frequent than that of microscopic level.
    I am just trying to say, fundamentally everything is changing with same speed but it's basis of point of our experience that making anything seem to be slow or fast.

  • @prakharkushwaha543
    @prakharkushwaha543 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    sir please explain in hindi

    • @bipinmaurya3824
      @bipinmaurya3824 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Bhai.. IIT mein class chal rha hai..koi majak nhi hai..sir ka without iit class Dekho

    • @beeta108_kartikkumarathani9
      @beeta108_kartikkumarathani9 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      BRO SCIENCE HUM ENGLISH MEI HI PADHE TO ACHHA HAI

    • @नेत्रावेदी
      @नेत्रावेदी 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@beeta108_kartikkumarathani9 tumhari baton se hin mai bata skta hun ki tumhe vigyan ki koi smjh nahin isiliye aisi bat bol rahe ho .

    • @thebhaskarrajput
      @thebhaskarrajput 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@नेत्रावेदी kyon be tujhe jada angreji ati hai kya?

    • @नेत्रावेदी
      @नेत्रावेदी 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@thebhaskarrajput abe gadhe pahale padh le aur smjh bhi le tb bola kr aur ye jan le tu ek darshanik se bat kr raha h jara sonch samjhkr bola kr.
      Pahle mera comment ko padh aur smjh ki maine kya bola h tu sonch raha h ki mai angreji bolane ki bat kr raha hun per tujhe smjh nahin aaya ki maine hindi ko prtoshahit kiya h.

  • @rohitraj4275
    @rohitraj4275 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    sir bihari ki image badal kar rakh di apne india ke samne

    • @shubhamjanagal7090
      @shubhamjanagal7090 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      How?

    • @rohitraj4275
      @rohitraj4275 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ajj pura desh ek bihari se physics pardh raha hai aur log dekh rahe hain ki bihari ko jaisa dikhaya jata hai woh waise nahi balki knowledge with decent hote hain

  • @jewett425
    @jewett425 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great. I m not an expert of general theory of relativity.

  • @balakrishnanganesan2511
    @balakrishnanganesan2511 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Anybody who understood general theory of relativity?

  • @ashugotam3692
    @ashugotam3692 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sir explain in Hindi ... Pls sir

  • @priyanshuRx
    @priyanshuRx 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Sir Hindi Me Samjhaiye

    • @beeta108_kartikkumarathani9
      @beeta108_kartikkumarathani9 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      KYA BHAI AAP ENTRANCE HINDI MEI DOGE KYA
      PHYSICS ENGLISH MEI SAMZE TO BEHTAR HAI
      HINDI MEI KUCH NAHI CLEAR HOGA KYA CHAL RAHA HAI
      AUR KUCH KAHNE KI JARURAT NAHI HAI AAP SAMAZ GYE HONGE

    • @नेत्रावेदी
      @नेत्रावेदी 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@beeta108_kartikkumarathani9 tumhare jaise sonch ke karan hin ye bharat puri trh bs handicap bnkr rah gya h ek bat aaj jan lo ki yahi isthiti rahi to tumlog kabhi vigyan ki duniya me kuchh naya nahin kr skte bs dusron ki do huyi chijono ko ratne ka hin pryas krte raho.

  • @LearningwithRizwan8452
    @LearningwithRizwan8452 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    fantastic Sir👍