Sir, I am very lucky that I am born in the same era where the greatest teacher of the world Sir H C Verma is also born. I grew up reading your concepts of Physics in the year 1997 when I was in class 11 and the same book is kept with all care and now my son studies from the same book who is in class 11. I have deep love and respect for you sir. You have made Physics so much lovely and enjoyable. My Pranam 🙏
@@hcverma2928Sir mai Maharashtra se hu Mere paas EWS ka certificate hai lekin agle saal I am not eligible for EWS Can I fill the form from EWS ? EWS se bharne se Jossa Counselling me problem hogi kya?
Sir please give a lecture in our school... you're my best of all time teacher sir please sir 1 lecture... My name = saniul Hossain Thander Class=xi Stream=science School=akra saktigarh rabindra vidyapith..(in west Bengal) Please sir one lecture 🙏
So C.O.M is that special position which does not let us to loose faith in those equations which we learnt and derive by introducing concept of POINT OBJECT.
Sir my name is Akshat I am from class 10th I am always confused that why an ammeter is connected in series and a voltmeter is connected in parallel also why the current divides in parallel connection and voltage divides in series connection, I have heard that the current always travels the shortest path so why does the current travels through our body (with high resistance) when we touch a live wire why does it not travels through the copper wire only isnt it the shortest path ??
Cuz the current will travel through shortest path, low resistance and high potential difference. If the current passes through our body it will directly reach the earth, which as 0 potential. That's why
BECAUSE IF WE CONNECT VOLTMETER IN SERIES THEN VOLTAGE GOT DIVIDED ON THE CONNECTED COMPONENTS EX BULB SO VOLTMETER WILL NOT BE ABLE TO MEASURE THE ACTUAL POTENTIAL DIFFERENCE SAME WITH THE AMMETER IN PARALLEL CURRENT GET DIVIDED IN BRANCHES OF THE SYSTEM IF WE CONNECT AMMETER IN PARALLEL THEN IT IS NOT ABLE TO MEASURE THE ACTUAL CURRENT AND REST OF YOUR QUESTION REGARDING THE CURRENT FLOW THROUGH BODY AS WE KNOW CURRENT FLOW DUE TO POTENTIAL DIFFERENCE i.e. is voltage and as current cannot flow from lower potential difference to higher potential difference so it flow through our body as we are connected to earth potential is considered to be zero so thats why current flow through body not flow back in copper wire i hope you are ablee to understand it
Ammeter is connected in series cuz it measures current which is constant along series. Voltmeter is connected in parallel cuz it measures voltage which is constant along parallel
Sir please explain the consevative and non conxervative property of electric field This is the toughest concept to understand, as electric field is conservative in electrostatics and non-conservative in current and induction
I respect you for how simple and accurate you've made physics. But what do you mean single particle? Single particle would mean a blackhole. because a point is considered as small as planck's length . A point at which all mass concentrates is a blackhole essentially. Had we considered a sphere of certain radius greater that schwar..radius, then that sphere would have meant to be a centre of mass that can behave physically consistent with the motion of the rotating object.
Sir I have mailed you a question about your Shanka Samadhan Video of "Mathematical Clarification". Sir please answer the question. Thanking you in Anticipation..
Sir !! I have a very interesting question for you about magnetic field . Sir why every magnetic field lines are close curve around any magnet why not in shape of rectangle or any other shape why always close curves
As a 10 class student.... Keep compass on the north pole of magnet ... if we will mark the tangential direction it automatically will be going curved because South pole is also attracting that compass needle .....also there would be only one tangential direction of the figure formed hence it's a curve..... Hence it forms a loop ....also inside the magnets there are also magnetic lines helping it to become entire curve.... 🙏🙏
@@ExplorifyHub_ Bro as I told in above comment that these things are practical and if we will keep the compass obviously its tip of needle will be towards the north from the south and if we'll mark the tangential direction ofc it will be a curve moving south to north ..... We don't have proof of all these things coz they are practical things .... Rest, idk more than what I explained।।।।🙏🙏
Hello Sir my name is Mohan Kumar , I study in class 10 I have a question related to Q Light chapter.. sir when I pass light rarer to denser medium its move towards the normal but when we passes a light through a concave lens its move away from normal sir tell me why it happen I am very happy when you answer my this question
• Why is -x +(-x)= -2x but -x(-x)= x²? I meant to say that why is the product of two negative numbers positive? • What does n⁰ exactly mean? What is its theoretical definition? I've been scratching my head 🙃
Hi Sir, first of all thank you so much for your contribution to education, your book has inspired me to pursue physics. Secondly sir, I had a related question relating to rotation and COM. If we apply a force on an object NOT going through its COM, we analyse using a torque with the axis being through the COM. Fundamentally, WHY does a free object even have to rotate when a force is applied not passing through its centre of mass, and why is that rotation always about the COM? Thanks, A Grateful student.
When a force is applied to an object in a way that doesn’t pass through its center of mass (COM), it induces both translational and rotational motion. For a "free" or unconstrained object (one not fixed to a pivot or axis), the COM acts as a natural balancing point for rotational motion. The object’s rotation around its COM allows for the simplest form of motion that preserves its angular momentum. This is why when we observe objects spinning freely, their rotation naturally centers around the COM. If we tried to analyze rotation around another point, the math would become more complicated because it would involve additional fictitious forces. Analyzing rotation around the COM simplifies things. If you choose a point other than the COM as your reference for rotation, the object’s inertia and the force distribution will create complex internal torques and fictitious (non-real) forces. These fictitious forces arise because the rotation is no longer centered at the COM, and thus, they don’t represent any real physical forces acting on the object. Newton’s laws for translation and rotation work seamlessly around the COM. When you analyze around the COM, you can apply Newton’s second law directly to calculate the translational acceleration of the COM and apply the rotational form of Newton’s second law (τ=Iα) to calculate the angular acceleration. Analyzing around the COM reduces the problem to dealing with just the actual forces and torques present, without introducing complexities of extra terms.
Sar i had a question Say a block of mass m is moving initially with a velocity v⁰ and the coefficient of friction u=Alpha×X. AND at centre X=0. Find max power developed as a function of x co-ordinate.
Sir please tell me the wavelength of black color. If black color appears due to no light emerges (reflected/refracted etc) from any source , then how the images of black objects is forming in the retina.
simple जब कोई लाइट रेटीना पर नहीं जाती। कन्फ्यूजन इस लिए होता है क्योंकि आंख खोलते ही आंख में हमेशा रोशनी जाती ही रहती है, ऐसा कभी नहीं होता जब खुली आंख में रोशनी न जाए शायद ऐसा अमावस की रात को हो लेकिन तारों की रोशनी भी तो पृथ्वी पर आती ही होगी 😉 @slevelpro
Sir I am shaurya Singh from class 11th sir there is a ques. of Transfer of heat.. on which I have doubt...The ques is - A body cools from 60°C to 40°C in 7 min.The temperature of surrounding is 10°C.After next 7 min. what will be its temperature ? Sir..why we can't take the initial temperature 60°C with time 14 min on the place of taking initial temperature 40°C with time 7 min ??
Sir I am a geologist and earth scientist by profession, I have a question that all the time come in my mind. Sir what would happen if we encircle an volcanic mountain with a gigantic solenoid, my imagination and intuition is telling me that all the metal within the magma will attract towards it and start accumulating on the periphery of this mountain and if it is true then we can actually extract this metal if it is economically feasible.
Sir I have a question does wave hav mass ???? (( If not then how they exert force and how they have momumentum ,and also by de brogli hypothesis particle can show wave nature so partical have mass means wave have mass ?????)
You are correct , a particle having certain mass behaves like a wave (has wavelength) and waves like light and cathode rays have mass (thus KE). But a massive particle (let us consider a tennis ball) having more mass and low velocity compared to a photon or electron, has a negligible wave nature (this has near 0 chance of passing Young's double slit). Similarly a high velocity particle with negligible mass (what we consider as a wave) would have negligible particle nature (thus you won't feel like getting gunshot after pointing a laser beam on hand , that's negligible Kinetic Energy). Hope that clears the doubt.
Sir myself Khushi Verma I want to ask that while studying radiations If we consider the example of hotspot technique used in Test. Cricket matches to detect whether the ball has touched the bat or not, so when the ball approaches near to the bat isn't it possible that due to their high mutual attractive force of attraction as distance is very small the surface of bat gets heated up and liberates radiations which may get detected by the camera and converted into visible spectrum and misjudgement may be there?
Sir kya center of mass ka concept isliye hai taki hum kisi bhi complicated body ko replace karke center of mass pr Maan sake taki hamara calculation easy ho jaye
SIR ,I HAVE A DOUBT ,FROM ,MACHINES ,CHAPTER OF CLASS 10th ,SIR IN A BLOCK AND TACKLE SYSTEM ,THE IDEAL MECHANICAL ADVANTAGE =n ,WHERE ,n = NUMBER OF SUPPORTING SEGMENTS ,WHICH ARE SUPPORTING LOAD = NUMBER OF PULLEYS ,AND ACCORDING TO THIS IF WE HAVE A PULLEY SYSTEM HAVING 2 PULLEYS IN EACH BLOCK ,WHERE THE DIRECTION OF EFFORT IS UPWARD ,THEN WE GET THE IDEAL MECHANICAL ADVANTAGE AS, 4 ,ACCORDING TO SCHOOL BOOKS ,BUT I THIN THAT IN THIS SPECIFIC CASE ,I THINK THAT THE EFFORT SEGMENT IS ALSO SUPPORTING THE LOAD ,DUE TO WHICH TOTAL SUPPORTING SEGMENTS ,AMD THE IDEAL MECHANICAL ADVANTAGE BECOMES ,5 ,SIR ,WHAT DO YOU THINK THE IDEAL MECHANICAL ADVANTAGE IS ,IS IT 4 OR 5?
sir I am raghav I have a doubt form class 9th and now studying in class11 which is like why the moons orbit doesn't shift towards the sun as the gravitational pull of sun is more in comparison to each other also if we subtract the forces applied by sun on moon to the force applied by earth on moon then also the resultant force is towards sun ??
Sir my name is polinaidu , how we multiply resistance interms of v/I bothe are same quantity or capacitance interms of charge divided/ voltage , and inductance formula
In the example of coin flipping, you saw the motion called trans rotational. We can easily study the translational motion using COM. And for rotation we won't assume all masses concentrated at centre, rather it's a rigid body. We will study the motion with respect to COM which breaks down our problem to pure rotation. So the Rotational Kinetic Energy wrt COM isn't zero at all. It's (1/2 Iw²) , {I =1/4mr² for coin here}. There will be translational KE as well which is 1/2mv² & yes v is the velocity of centre of mass. Hope you got it :)
Sir mai Maharashtra se hu Mere paas EWS ka certificate hai lekin agle saal I am not eligible for EWS Can I fill the form from EWS ? EWS se bharne se Jossa Counselling me problem hogi kya?
Sir i am a student of class 9th My question: If we are moving frame and see objects then objects which are closer to is are appear to move fast in backward direction but when we see distance objects it move slowly so when we increase distance of object from us it's speed of moving toward backward is deacreases why🤔🤔🤔🤔, ~ Gaurav Kumar
Sir pranam . Sir I am kushagra Srivastava wondering about why if sun get disappeared then how much time it will take for earth to be free from sun gravitational field. sir I concluded 8 minutes after lot of searching but I don't know the reason why did this can happen.sir please if you have time please check out this question.
hello sir i am a student of class 10 i have an doubt in physics that is a square loop occupies more area than a circular loop, both are made of equal length of wire. is it true or false? i found answer but it cannot satisfy me please solve my problem as quickly as possible thank you yours sincerely NIDHI SHARMA
Sir I have doubt in law of addition of vectors... If a body is pulled by 2 people and each person is pulling the body with velocity v.. then we see the body to be moving at velocity v.. but if we apply law of vectors then velocity should be 2v.. What is the error?
सर क्या सभी atom मे सभी orbital होते है Hydrogen spectrum मे बताया जाता है की जब electron अलग अलग कक्षाओं से किसी कक्षा मे आता है तो अलग अलग तरंग छोड़ता है सवाल अब ये है की जब hydrogen मे एक ही कक्षा होती है तो ये hydrogen spectrum की व्याख्या के लिए ये concept क्यों लिया गया है मै एक छोटे से गाव से हु जहा कोई भी ऐसी सवाल का जबाब देने मे सक्षम नही है plz सर कृप्या कर के बताये कुछ
SIR GRAVITATIONAL LAW SAYS EVERY OBJECTS ATTRACT EACH OTHER WHICH IMPLIES EARTH ALSO ATTRACTED BY SUN BUT WHY THE EARTH IS REVOLVING AROUND SUN INSTEAD OF GOING TOWARD THE SUN ?
Let's the radius of the coin be R, And we toss the coin in three ways A. Thumb is hitting the coin at 0.9R from center B. Thumb is hitting the coin at 0.5R from centre C. Thumb is hitting the coin at the centre Question: If the force of hitting the coin is same for all cases, will COM gain the same height in all three experiments? I think no, Because in A and B the coin will gain a rotational KE (as it will spin) in addition to its vertical translational motin. So the same energy will be used in both translational and rotational KE. Whereas in C the coin will not spin and and hence will attain max height. Am I right or I am not getting something?
I am impressed by your logical thinking. However the initial energy is provided by you during the flicking. If you apply the force for a time dt, the displacement of the point of contact is different in the three cases. So they start with different total kinetic energies (rotational and translational). Finally they will reach the same height. Xavier-bv6yd: Sorry, I interrupted. You wanted Nilotpal to think more on it which is what I also generally do. But I knew that I will not come back to this post, so could not restrain responding. I rally liked Nilotpal's questioning spirit.
Sir Centre of Mass ka definition hum Tution Sir se sikhe hain ki COM woh point hota hai space me jis point ke about pura body ka kisisvi points ka moment of mass Zero hota hai Aap ne toh aisa kuchh bole nhi to humko doubt ho raha hai
Explanation was nice but it could have been better, it did not addressed all the misconception asked by the student and did not clear the muddy point. I feel it could have been explained in a better way.
I request you please explain it in your way and also send me the link at hcverma@iitk.ac.in as I will not come back to this post. I am always keen to learn from other friends. Best wishes.
mere teacher hamesha khete rehte he ke hcv ke rotational motion ke sare question karlo per mujhe ye samajh nhi atta he ke questions ke shuruat kase karne mane kaye bar kosish bhe ke😑
Naah u can't do it for electric field because in basic formula of electric field due to point charge ,there is term 1/r² which doesn't match with formula for calculating centre of mass (£dm×r/£dm) but while calculating diapole moment for a charge distribution u can assume whole charge concentrated at centre mass of the body, reasons ( P=dq×r ) whiche clearly resembles with formula of centre of mass
The best awarded teacher of India!!
From
Moscow Russia
bhai russia pahuch gaya ... padhai karne 🌚🌚
@frickingcore1o_ I am also teacher....
Thanks. I wish you go ahead of me.
@@frickingcore1o_Sari umar mai joker sa Banya phira 😂😂
@@frickingcore1o_ brainrotted kid
you are the pride of india .
I have meet you sir ❤
I am Raji from Ballia Uttar Pradesh
भाई मे भी ballia से हु
सर आपका बहुत बहुत धन्यवाद जो आपने हिन्दी मीडियम के लिए 1 किताब पब्लिश किया जो आपने हिन्दी मीडियम बच्चों के लिए मेहनत किया । ❤❤
Sir, I am very lucky that I am born in the same era where the greatest teacher of the world Sir H C Verma is also born. I grew up reading your concepts of Physics in the year 1997 when I was in class 11 and the same book is kept with all care and now my son studies from the same book who is in class 11.
I have deep love and respect for you sir. You have made Physics so much lovely and enjoyable. My Pranam 🙏
Thanks for your kind words, your love and respect for physics is inspiring. Where are you placed? pl write at hcverma@iitk.ac.in
Being a teacher one can learn how calmly things can be explained
Thank you sir
sir you helpd me clearing this concept your videos and books are filled with knowledge
thanks
@@hcverma2928Sir mai Maharashtra se hu Mere paas EWS ka certificate hai lekin agle saal I am not eligible for EWS Can I fill the form from EWS ? EWS se bharne se Jossa Counselling me problem hogi kya?
Sir how can I ask you digram based questions@@hcverma2928
Thank you Hc verma sir this doubt never clicked in me but the answer of this doubt cleared my whole doubt about centre of mass thank you 😊
Great Teacher
Love you sir from West Bengal ❤️❤️
More appropriate definition of COM is ,it is a point in a space about which net mass movement is zero.
Sir please give a lecture in our school... you're my best of all time teacher sir please sir 1 lecture...
My name = saniul Hossain Thander
Class=xi
Stream=science
School=akra saktigarh rabindra vidyapith..(in west Bengal)
Please sir one lecture 🙏
thank you sir , i had the same query in regard of a hollow sphere and it got resolved almost after 2 years.
🎉🎉Sir ,ek video banaiye ,about difference between Shell,sub-shell and orbitals.
Sir ye doubt koi clear nhi kr paya
So C.O.M is that special position which does not let us to loose faith in those equations which we learnt and derive by introducing concept of POINT OBJECT.
So great energetic teacher!!
Thanks
Very Clear Explanation.
Namaskar Guru ji 😊😊
Love you sir , from West Bengal
Pranaam Gurudev.
Same doubt in my mind thanks Sir fir clearing this
Hats off to you sir
The student must be a student of Saleem sir 😅😅😅
Why????
@Khan-pk7tr unhone ye definition galat btayi thi aur ise galat proof bhi ki thi
@@unknowndevian28 which batch??
@@Khan-pk7tr arjuna 2024
@@unknowndevian28 bro saleem sir ne kes batch Mai pure chapters karaye complete physics jes Mai prhya hu sir ne o batch konsa wala hai ??
❤❤ charan sparsh guru 🙏 ji
Sir my name is Akshat I am from class 10th I am always confused that why an ammeter is connected in series and a voltmeter is connected in parallel also why the current divides in parallel connection and voltage divides in series connection, I have heard that the current always travels the shortest path so why does the current travels through our body (with high resistance) when we touch a live wire why does it not travels through the copper wire only isnt it the shortest path ??
Cuz the current will travel through shortest path, low resistance and high potential difference.
If the current passes through our body it will directly reach the earth, which as 0 potential. That's why
BECAUSE IF WE CONNECT VOLTMETER IN SERIES THEN VOLTAGE GOT DIVIDED ON THE CONNECTED COMPONENTS EX BULB SO VOLTMETER WILL NOT BE ABLE TO MEASURE THE ACTUAL POTENTIAL DIFFERENCE SAME WITH THE AMMETER IN PARALLEL CURRENT GET DIVIDED IN BRANCHES OF THE SYSTEM IF WE CONNECT AMMETER IN PARALLEL THEN IT IS NOT ABLE TO MEASURE THE ACTUAL CURRENT AND REST OF YOUR QUESTION REGARDING THE CURRENT FLOW THROUGH BODY AS WE KNOW CURRENT FLOW DUE TO POTENTIAL DIFFERENCE i.e. is voltage and as current cannot flow from lower potential difference to higher potential difference so it flow through our body as we are connected to earth potential is considered to be zero so thats why current flow through body not flow back in copper wire i hope you are ablee to understand it
ok
Ammeter is connected in series cuz it measures current which is constant along series.
Voltmeter is connected in parallel cuz it measures voltage which is constant along parallel
@@garvitagarwal56exactly
Thank you sir ji
Very Nice Sir Thanks..
Sir please explain the consevative and non conxervative property of electric field
This is the toughest concept to understand, as electric field is conservative in electrostatics and non-conservative in current and induction
Thank u sir❤❤❤I am mir aniq
I respect you for how simple and accurate you've made physics. But what do you mean single particle? Single particle would mean a blackhole. because a point is considered as small as planck's length . A point at which all mass concentrates is a blackhole essentially. Had we considered a sphere of certain radius greater that schwar..radius, then that sphere would have meant to be a centre of mass that can behave physically consistent with the motion of the rotating object.
Sir I have mailed you a question about your Shanka Samadhan Video of "Mathematical Clarification". Sir please answer the question.
Thanking you in Anticipation..
Sir my name is Aryaman Mishra,I am in class 9 and I have completed Concepts of physics part 1
You are the best teacher.
Your concepts are beneficial in learning and knowing the depth of physics👍👏👏👏
Sir aap se pdne ka mn kr rha h.... isliye pure lecture TH-cam pr record krke dal dijiye
Sir !!
I have a very interesting question for you about magnetic field .
Sir why every magnetic field lines are close curve around any magnet why not in shape of rectangle or any other shape why always close curves
Tangent should be defined for direction
As a 10 class student....
Keep compass on the north pole of magnet ...
if we will mark the tangential direction it automatically will be going curved because South pole is also attracting that compass needle .....also there would be only one tangential direction of the figure formed hence it's a curve..... Hence it forms a loop ....also inside the magnets there are also magnetic lines helping it to become entire curve.... 🙏🙏
Bro tell me why every magnets have only close curve shaped magnetic field lines why not in rectangle or any other relevant shape@@chitraR._holistic
@@ExplorifyHub_
Bro as I told in above comment that these things are practical and if we will keep the compass obviously its tip of needle will be towards the north from the south and if we'll mark the tangential direction ofc it will be a curve moving south to north .....
We don't have proof of all these things coz they are practical things ....
Rest, idk more than what I explained।।।।🙏🙏
With matter no one can reach there but with wave nature it is possible to all!
Sir can you please explain the phenomenon of x ray bombarding on an gold leaf electroscope
Best explanation sir
So nice of you.
Hello Sir my name is Mohan Kumar , I study in class 10 I have a question related to Q Light chapter.. sir when I pass light rarer to denser medium its move towards the normal but when we passes a light through a concave lens its move away from normal sir tell me why it happen I am very happy when you answer my this question
• Why is -x +(-x)= -2x but -x(-x)= x²? I meant to say that why is the product of two negative numbers positive?
• What does n⁰ exactly mean? What is its theoretical definition?
I've been scratching my head 🙃
Sir happy chhath puja🙏🙏🙏🙏
Good evening sir from Nepal 🇳🇵
Thank you sir
सादर प्रणाम Sir 🙏🙏
Sir what is the correct method to solve movable pulley questions?? Pls make a video on this
Hi Sir, first of all thank you so much for your contribution to education, your book has inspired me to pursue physics.
Secondly sir, I had a related question relating to rotation and COM. If we apply a force on an object NOT going through its COM, we analyse using a torque with the axis being through the COM. Fundamentally, WHY does a free object even have to rotate when a force is applied not passing through its centre of mass, and why is that rotation always about the COM?
Thanks,
A Grateful student.
When a force is applied to an object in a way that doesn’t pass through its center of mass (COM), it induces both translational and rotational motion. For a "free" or unconstrained object (one not fixed to a pivot or axis), the COM acts as a natural balancing point for rotational motion. The object’s rotation around its COM allows for the simplest form of motion that preserves its angular momentum. This is why when we observe objects spinning freely, their rotation naturally centers around the COM.
If we tried to analyze rotation around another point, the math would become more complicated because it would involve additional fictitious forces. Analyzing rotation around the COM simplifies things.
If you choose a point other than the COM as your reference for rotation, the object’s inertia and the force distribution will create complex internal torques and fictitious (non-real) forces. These fictitious forces arise because the rotation is no longer centered at the COM, and thus, they don’t represent any real physical forces acting on the object.
Newton’s laws for translation and rotation work seamlessly around the COM. When you analyze around the COM, you can apply Newton’s second law directly to calculate the translational acceleration of the COM and apply the rotational form of Newton’s second law (τ=Iα) to calculate the angular acceleration.
Analyzing around the COM reduces the problem to dealing with just the actual forces and torques present, without introducing complexities of extra terms.
Sar i had a question
Say a block of mass m is moving initially with a velocity v⁰ and the coefficient of friction u=Alpha×X. AND at centre X=0. Find max power developed as a function of x co-ordinate.
Sir please tell me the wavelength of black color. If black color appears due to no light emerges (reflected/refracted etc) from any source , then how the images of black objects is forming in the retina.
simple जब कोई लाइट रेटीना पर नहीं जाती।
कन्फ्यूजन इस लिए होता है क्योंकि आंख खोलते ही आंख में हमेशा रोशनी जाती ही रहती है, ऐसा कभी नहीं होता जब खुली आंख में रोशनी न जाए शायद ऐसा अमावस की रात को हो लेकिन तारों की रोशनी भी तो पृथ्वी पर आती ही होगी 😉 @slevelpro
❤❤
@HCV Sir, charan sparsh
aapko apne doubts kaise bhejein?
Aachrya prashant ❤️ ❤️
Climate change 💀 🥇
Sir please tell how to ask you my doubt
email kr skte ho tum sir ko
@shrutii.28 e-mail ID bata do please
👍👍
Sir I am shaurya Singh from class 11th sir there is a ques. of Transfer of heat.. on which I have doubt...The ques is - A body cools from 60°C to 40°C in 7 min.The temperature of surrounding is 10°C.After next 7 min. what will be its temperature ?
Sir..why we can't take the initial temperature 60°C with time 14 min on the place of taking initial temperature 40°C with time 7 min ??
Sir Can you please explain about Vector Form of gravitation, its so confusing (r12 and r21)
Sir I am a geologist and earth scientist by profession, I have a question that all the time come in my mind.
Sir what would happen if we encircle an volcanic mountain with a gigantic solenoid, my imagination and intuition is telling me that all the metal within the magma will attract towards it and start accumulating on the periphery of this mountain and if it is true then we can actually extract this metal if it is economically feasible.
Good question.
Sir I have a question does wave hav mass ???? (( If not then how they exert force and how they have momumentum ,and also by de brogli hypothesis particle can show wave nature so partical have mass means wave have mass ?????)
You are correct , a particle having certain mass behaves like a wave (has wavelength) and waves like light and cathode rays have mass (thus KE). But a massive particle (let us consider a tennis ball) having more mass and low velocity compared to a photon or electron, has a negligible wave nature (this has near 0 chance of passing Young's double slit). Similarly a high velocity particle with negligible mass (what we consider as a wave) would have negligible particle nature (thus you won't feel like getting gunshot after pointing a laser beam on hand , that's negligible Kinetic Energy). Hope that clears the doubt.
Sir universe ke bare me kuch bataye please 🙏🙏🙏
Sir please make a video on earth magnetism please🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
Sir where an electron takes energy to orbit the nucleus for as long as it exists
Sir jee advanced ka question karo please 😢😢😢😢😢
Thank u sir ❤
My pleasure.
Sir myself Khushi Verma
I want to ask that while studying radiations
If we consider the example of hotspot technique used in Test. Cricket matches to detect whether the ball has touched the bat or not, so when the ball approaches near to the bat isn't it possible that due to their high mutual attractive force of attraction as distance is very small the surface of bat gets heated up and liberates radiations which may get detected by the camera and converted into visible spectrum and misjudgement may be there?
Sir universe bare me kuch bataye please 🙏🙏🙏🙏
Sir kya center of mass ka concept isliye hai taki hum kisi bhi complicated body ko replace karke center of mass pr Maan sake taki hamara calculation easy ho jaye
SIR ,I HAVE A DOUBT ,FROM ,MACHINES ,CHAPTER OF CLASS 10th ,SIR IN A BLOCK AND TACKLE SYSTEM ,THE IDEAL MECHANICAL ADVANTAGE =n ,WHERE ,n = NUMBER OF SUPPORTING SEGMENTS ,WHICH ARE SUPPORTING LOAD = NUMBER OF PULLEYS ,AND ACCORDING TO THIS IF WE HAVE A PULLEY SYSTEM HAVING 2 PULLEYS IN EACH BLOCK ,WHERE THE DIRECTION OF EFFORT IS UPWARD ,THEN WE GET THE IDEAL MECHANICAL ADVANTAGE AS, 4 ,ACCORDING TO SCHOOL BOOKS ,BUT I THIN THAT IN THIS SPECIFIC CASE ,I THINK THAT THE EFFORT SEGMENT IS ALSO SUPPORTING THE LOAD ,DUE TO WHICH TOTAL SUPPORTING SEGMENTS ,AMD THE IDEAL MECHANICAL ADVANTAGE BECOMES ,5 ,SIR ,WHAT DO YOU THINK THE IDEAL MECHANICAL ADVANTAGE IS ,IS IT 4 OR 5?
sir I am raghav
I have a doubt form class 9th and now studying in class11 which is like
why the moons orbit doesn't shift towards the sun as the gravitational pull of sun is more in comparison to each other also if we subtract the forces applied by sun on moon to the force applied by earth on moon then also the resultant force is towards sun ??
Sir my name is polinaidu , how we multiply resistance interms of v/I bothe are same quantity or capacitance interms of charge divided/ voltage , and inductance formula
Sir, please explain about rotational kinetic energy being zero. That question is left unanswered in your explanation.
In the example of coin flipping, you saw the motion called trans rotational. We can easily study the translational motion using COM. And for rotation we won't assume all masses concentrated at centre, rather it's a rigid body. We will study the motion with respect to COM which breaks down our problem to pure rotation. So the Rotational Kinetic Energy wrt COM isn't zero at all. It's (1/2 Iw²) , {I =1/4mr² for coin here}. There will be translational KE as well which is 1/2mv² & yes v is the velocity of centre of mass. Hope you got it :)
In electrostatics why we take only positive charges on surface
Free electrons also exist on Surface of Metals....
Sir i have a question on Gauss's law of electric flux...is gauss law applicable for all medium?
Sir mai Maharashtra se hu Mere paas EWS ka certificate hai lekin agle saal I am not eligible for EWS Can I fill the form from EWS ? EWS se bharne se Jossa Counselling me problem hogi kya?
Then kinetic energy is of centre of mass only, not of entire disk or ring, is it right please explain Sir.
like who want to a video on THEORY OF RELATIVITY😍😍😍😍❤❤
Sir i am a student of class 9th
My question:
If we are moving frame and see objects then objects which are closer to is are appear to move fast in backward direction but when we see distance objects it move slowly so when we increase distance of object from us it's speed of moving toward backward is deacreases why🤔🤔🤔🤔,
~ Gaurav Kumar
you should email him to get answer of this question
Sir pranam . Sir I am kushagra Srivastava wondering about why if sun get disappeared then how much time it will take for earth to be free from sun gravitational field. sir I concluded 8 minutes after lot of searching but I don't know the reason why did this can happen.sir please if you have time please check out this question.
🙏🙏🙏
hello sir i am a student of class 10
i have an doubt in physics that is
a square loop occupies more area than a circular loop, both are made of equal length of wire. is it true or false?
i found answer but it cannot satisfy me
please solve my problem as quickly as possible
thank you
yours sincerely
NIDHI SHARMA
Circular loop ka area jyada hoga
It can be proved using maths that square and circle having same perimeter, area enclosed by circle will be always more than that of square.
If (-5)^x=5 then x =?
Sir I have doubt in law of addition of vectors... If a body is pulled by 2 people and each person is pulling the body with velocity v.. then we see the body to be moving at velocity v.. but if we apply law of vectors then velocity should be 2v.. What is the error?
why rainbow is seem in arc
Sir I am Pritam my questions is when an electron takes energy to orbit the nucleus for as long as it exists
Sir why there is an electric and magnetic field in em wave even there is no charge there .
Sir i have a question my name is ankit kumar and my question is which theory is correct SPDF or KLMN
Modern time ke Rishi Muni ho aap sir🙏
सर क्या सभी atom मे सभी orbital होते है
Hydrogen spectrum मे बताया जाता है की जब electron अलग अलग कक्षाओं से किसी कक्षा मे आता है तो अलग अलग तरंग छोड़ता है
सवाल अब ये है की जब hydrogen मे एक ही कक्षा होती है तो ये hydrogen spectrum की व्याख्या के लिए ये concept क्यों लिया गया है
मै एक छोटे से गाव से हु जहा कोई भी ऐसी सवाल का जबाब देने मे सक्षम नही है plz सर कृप्या कर के बताये कुछ
SIR GRAVITATIONAL LAW SAYS EVERY OBJECTS ATTRACT EACH OTHER WHICH IMPLIES EARTH ALSO ATTRACTED BY SUN BUT WHY THE EARTH IS REVOLVING AROUND SUN INSTEAD OF GOING TOWARD THE SUN ?
Let's the radius of the coin be R,
And we toss the coin in three ways
A. Thumb is hitting the coin at 0.9R from center
B. Thumb is hitting the coin at 0.5R from centre
C. Thumb is hitting the coin at the centre
Question: If the force of hitting the coin is same for all cases, will COM gain the same height in all three experiments?
I think no,
Because in A and B the coin will gain a rotational KE (as it will spin) in addition to its vertical translational motin. So the same energy will be used in both translational and rotational KE.
Whereas in C the coin will not spin and and hence will attain max height.
Am I right or I am not getting something?
You are right but just missing a small point. Try to figure it out.
I think it is torque which cause rotation not force so com will, have diffrent height due to diffrent value of torque
I am impressed by your logical thinking. However the initial energy is provided by you during the flicking. If you apply the force for a time dt, the displacement of the point of contact is different in the three cases. So they start with different total kinetic energies (rotational and translational). Finally they will reach the same height.
Xavier-bv6yd: Sorry, I interrupted. You wanted Nilotpal to think more on it which is what I also generally do. But I knew that I will not come back to this post, so could not restrain responding. I rally liked Nilotpal's questioning spirit.
same hight पर नहीं जाएगी अगर force same है तो hight त्रिकोणमिति के रूल का पालन करेगी
Sir does light have mass ?
hello sir i am from UP
what is the source of gravity
Sir
Centre of Mass ka definition hum Tution Sir se sikhe hain ki COM woh point hota hai space me jis point ke about pura body ka kisisvi points ka moment of mass Zero hota hai
Aap ne toh aisa kuchh bole nhi to humko doubt ho raha hai
First comment
Sir mere se physics ke numericals solve nii hote samjh hee nahi aata kya karu please give some guidance
Explanation was nice but it could have been better, it did not addressed all the misconception asked by the student and did not clear the muddy point. I feel it could have been explained in a better way.
I request you please explain it in your way and also send me the link at hcverma@iitk.ac.in as I will not come back to this post. I am always keen to learn from other friends. Best wishes.
How humble you are sir ❤️💗
@@Challengeacceptingyouth bhai muje to underlying gussa dikh rha tha 🤣.
Sir can you please give a brief explanation bout moving charges and magnetism... That chapter is so boring and hard🥲
Sir aapse baat ho sakti ho kya.
Sir I am Harshvardhan Khatri from madhya pradesh of class 11th , Sir my doubt is what is impulse.
सर आपका बहुत बहुत धन्यवाद जो आपने हिन्दी मीडियम के लिए 1 किताब पब्लिश किया जो आपने हिन्दी मीडियम बच्चों के लिए मेहनत किया । ❤❤
Sir mai Hindi medium student hu mujhe aisa lgta hai ki hum log jee nhi clear kr skte
Pls suggest me sir
I want to ask doubt how pls
Mail karo 😮
mere teacher hamesha khete rehte he ke hcv ke rotational motion ke sare question karlo per mujhe ye samajh nhi atta he ke questions ke shuruat kase karne mane kaye bar kosish bhe ke😑
centre of mass ki tarah centre of charge assume kar sakte hai kya? For calculating electric field due to charge distribution....
Naah u can't do it for electric field because in basic formula of electric field due to point charge ,there is term 1/r² which doesn't match with formula for calculating centre of mass (£dm×r/£dm) but while calculating diapole moment for a charge distribution u can assume whole charge concentrated at centre mass of the body, reasons ( P=dq×r ) whiche clearly resembles with formula of centre of mass
@ oh alright, thank you for the explanation!
@@dipteeshukla7 my pleasure!!