@@trafalgalaw_lk3793 not one woman on that panel objects to boys in girls showers or toilets in school. So they aren’t feminist. They really don’t care about women, they care about power and following a cult philosophy.
When democrats say "woman" they don't mean only people who menstruate . So if republicans nominate a real woman, the demoncrats will change the definition of a woman.
Im a democrat and voted all my life as one. It all depends on the candidate. The republican i would consider voting for is kelly ayotte of new hampshire but that depends on who she is running against on the democratic side. mind you i dont believe in all of her views. Another republican i would might consider is mia love of utah the congress women and I dont agree with all of her political views on church and state. But that is the difference is the a lot of republicans will come up with dumb reason not to vote for a women that is a democrat. It is always she is not the right women. So tell me which democrat women is the right one? Also as human a lot of people are sexiest and bias and just dont want to admit it. They are afraid of the consequences. That goes for every political party and person to a certain degree.
Karmala was "joy" in a moment where Americans are losing jobs, fear losing jobs, struggling to put food on the table, pay bills, pay for housing, can't buy a home, can't get a raise, etc.. Americans wanted someone angry, who represented how they feel. She was out of touch with the public.
So conservatives electing a rapist really represents the general feelings of Americans? Who'd want that kind of civilization to be allowed any freedoms in the world?
Mind Begs the Question: ▪︎Satan said Devils/Jinns are Superior Race ▪︎Hitler said Ariens are Superior Race ▪︎Those who hold Superior Race/Caste complex ▪︎Following - God or Satan?
so, being serious, it's not about that at all. it's just not limiting people from being a possibility because of gender, religion, race. you STILL gotta be a good candidate. i thought kamala was that. hillary though? guh. do not like. nope. so i'm not a dude and i'm telling you SURE i wanna see it happen but it's gotta be a good candidate. most of us would NOT use gender as the criteria. we just don't want it to be a blocker. that's it.
But it’s almost like a black women will be called a dei regardless of if they’re qualified or not. The right will always say it’s affirmative action or wokeness. Even the black male Obama had to be exceptional to win, not just a good candidate. Are you telling me Joe Biden was better than Hillary and Kamala? Because they all went up against the same person but it was only the white man who won. That speaks for itself.
People don't really care about gender or race until a violent oligarch propagandist bought a $44 billion company to spew misinformation and propaganda to influence public opinion into the toilet
Being a rich person like Kamala or Hillary, woman or not, is the easiest thing to do in America. Zero hardship and a great easy life if they want it. These people are completely out of touch.
nah. do better. that's just sad. surely you got some better picks on your side. hell, even nancy mace is better (if she's not doing soundbyte bs.) like check her out in the ufo/uap congressional hearings. there, she really looks pretty legit. people could vote for that. but there's still GOTTA be some women up there that have exp (for real, exp) and aren't 80. kick the tires. gotta be SOMEONE in the party. there's so many people in congress.
Clinton is obviously giving a nod to Tulsi Gabbard. And this is highly ironic given that she likely would have ALREADY been had Dems nominated her in 2020. But instead went with Ol Cornpop and Kamalama.
No he's not. That was likely said to put pressure on the right to consider a woman candidate, which I don't see happening ever. It's always been a white man. The only black man was a Democrat.
@@isaacm2374 Lol Kamala Harris got like 800 votes in 2020 and y'all ran her for President, Gabbard will do great and will have my full support if she runs.
In the twenty or so years since he left office I have never once heard anybody say "What does Bill Clinton think of this?" I am pretty sure there was a reason for that.
Let me ask you what is the role of the vp in the constitution? The vp no matter what party in power dont have much to do. Only reason she was more active in her role is because it was 50/50. Like right now jd vance will be doing nothing but going to fundraisers because republicans in the senate has a 53 majority. I want republicans to be honest and say i just didnt like her and stop making excuses. Which women would you vote for? She has to run and win the primary? Let me guess it will be a republican women not some one else from a different party? Just be honest.
@@blackchairman2271 I don't like her. Never did. Never will. If the right woman ran, Condoleezza Rice (R), Tulsi Gabbard (I), Val Demings (D)….. I know people from both sides who would vote for all of these women…. I would vote for any of these woman.
well it's a conundrum. if the party doesn't care about women's rights, and vote to take those away..... it detracts from a female candidate even if she seemed like a good one.
I don’t know what she’s talking about. Kamala wasn’t discredit Ted because she’s a female and she laughed. That’s like saying Trump was discredited for having hair that looks like a toupee, but that’s ok because he’s a man and it’s Trump. CNN you lost me. These people are so unreasonable and unwavering even when they are wrong
The general analysis is sooooooooo damn clichéd... There are plenty of Democratic female leaders who would have won against Trump with the proper campaign length, even Kamala Harris. The question of "authenticity"... Really??? Think: Gretchen Whitmer, Elissa Slotkin... as authentically themselves as any male political, and twice as kick-ass than most!
Omggg! Who is this lady in green? Please stop dragging down all women with this idiocracy! Stop making all women look dumb! Kamala is weak! Accept it! Tulsi Gabbard for president 🫡
It won't be easy for a liberal woman(Democrat woman) to become president of US because the society see a Feminist instead of a woman when they think of a liberal American woman. That's the issue. My hyper conservative Asian country had 2 female leaders who lead my country but they were all very traditional woman. They were not feminist at all. And all political parties in my country are socially conservative while Economical policies has differences. As I said it's because my country has a hyper conservative society. So the point is life is easier for conservative women but a uphill battle for liberal women in all countries. That's why it's likely that first female President of US is going to be a Republican.
That makes a lot of sense. But there’s few liberals left in America. Women or men. They have transformed into a Rainbow Communist philosophy with big business driving their wagon. So a conservative would be a more attractive candidate. In the end -- best qualified versus sex should be the deciding factor.
This whole topic is stupid fallacy: remember, Nikki Haley got nowhere. A Republican women would get just about the same. Until misogyny is addressed, every woman faces the same glass wall.
yea sure Bernie. Maybe people are sick of all the name calling like you just did there. Always got an excuse other than the truth, the left is run by a bunch of white elitist women who think they know whats best for their poor little serfs. WRONG
The countless times I have heard "how education ruins women, women are too emotional, women are not respected," has taught me that this country isn't ready for a woman.
😂😂😂😂 liberal women make abortion their biggest issue, which impacts 0.2% of pop annually. Then conservative women make big issues their priority. And the lady in the green is why fewer and fewer peopme watch cnn.
Nobody is talking about the fact that both women candidates for president were not truly elected. Hillary with the stupid super-delegates and Kamala with the last minute rush to the stage. All they have to do is let it happen democratically with the person truly winning the hearts and minds of either party.
Well considering men particularly whyte men like myself hold great disdain for whyte Liberal woman even my sister. So he might have a point. Whyte men will not listen to a lying deceitful Liberal woman.
@GeorgieGirl1028, Kamala had every opportunity to be on national television, do interviews and podcasts. Instead all you got was a billion dollar concession speech and a 20 million dollar bar tab.
As someone who is conservative I do absolutely agree that both Kamala and Hillary were held to different standard than any man but I think their 'record' on matters or lack thereof cost them both. Either way, I would never vote for a woman because I am a woman too. Sorry, but when you want to preside over the most powerful country in the world, your RACE and GENDER MUST NOT be tools to be used or matters to be considered.
can you list these stardards so we can go through them. Demoncrats did not field a good candidate. Women want equal treatment and then complain when they get it. By the way why are we even arguing, Trump is going to transition into a woman and run again. lol
Just the fact that a barely coherent Biden beat Trump but both Kamala and Hillary lost to him just shows how much of the bar is higher for a female candidate
If Tulsi Gabbard were the Democrat nominee in 2020 she would've been the first woman president. Being serious, authentic and intelligent is more important as a leader than be a cackling buffoon.
Trump is not leading an Age of Enlightenment, and I can prove it through research and history. To lead the age of enlightenment, you have to conduct yourself using John Lockes values. Donald Trump doesn't have one of John Locke's values. Abraham Lincoln revered our founders. He learned our founders values and conducted his governance using their values. The Gemini AI definition of "enlightenment" is "The Enlightenment was a philosophical movement that emphasized reason, individualism, and skepticism. It challenged traditional authority and advocated for progress, tolerance, and human rights." There are a total of 20 values and principles that make up John Locke's Enlightenment. Locke created an exclusive definition for each term. They are: Reason, Empericism, Skepticism, Individualism, Secularism, Progress, Natural Rights, Liberty, Equality, Consent of the Governed, Limited Government, The Rule of Law, Separation of Powers, Religious Tolerance, Social Contract, Justice, Self-Ownership and Property, Economic Liberty, Education, Pragmatism Our founders embraced the Enlightenment because they observed monarchs and theocrats to be oppressive and dictatorial. The founders took these values and principles and placed them in a social contract, then encased it in a democratic republic. Our founders weaved their values and principles throughout our foundational documents. When a person swears an oath to the Constitution, that oath is also being applied to the Declaration of Independence and the Bill of Rights. That political leader swears he/she will govern using the values and principles of our founders and John Locke, NOT Christianity. The founders did not want there country to be controlled by religious dogma. This is verified in Article XI of the Treaty of Tripoli: “As the government of the United States of America is not in any sense founded on the Christian religion." There are 2 rules in John Locke's Enlightenment that the government and the people it protects are expected to have the honor and character to utilize; they are "individual liberties" and "public good." Public Good In an enlightened society, citizens are required to understand and accept their responsibility to sacrifice certain liberties and personal well-being for the protection of others-such as taking up arms in wartime (with exceptions for pacifists) or wearing protective gear and accepting vaccines during health crises. The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted how a lack of adherence to these values allowed the virus to spread due to selfish refusals to protect others. An enlightened government’s primary role, as defined by John Locke, is to safeguard individual life, liberty, and self-governance from coercive, reckless, or tyrannical actions by individuals, groups, or the state. Individual Liberty Liberty as defined by John Locke's Enlightenment 1. Natural Rights Life, Liberty, and Property: Every individual possesses inherent rights, including the right to life, liberty, and property. These rights are fundamental and must be respected by govt. 2. Freedom from Oppression Political Liberty: means being free from arbitrary power and oppression. Individuals should not be subjected to the whims of others, particularly those in positions of authority. 3. Consent and Governance Social Contract: Locke argued that legitimate govt is based on the consent of the governed. People enter a social contract to form a govt that protects their rights. If a govt fails to do so, citizens have the right to revolt. 4. Individual Autonomy Self-Governance: Liberty includes the ability to make choices regarding one’s own life and property. Individuals should have the autonomy to pursue their own interests as long as they do not infringe upon the rights of others. Our schools failed the founders when they did not teach us these values and principles. That is why the country is in a mess Patriotism is knowing, supporting, protecting, and growing the values, principles, and vision of our founders for the country they gifted us so we can pass their vision on to future generations. A reminder to conservatives that Abraham Lincoln started the Republican Party. Why aren't Republicans conducting themselves according to Lincoln's values? I asked Microsoft Copilot, "What are Abraham Lincoln's values?" It sourced the following: Abraham Lincoln's Classroom, Museum Lincoln College, GOACTA, and Britannica It returned with the following: Equality, individual rights, a unified nation, liberty, the rule of law, charity, compassion and forgiveness, humility, honesty, integrity, and courage: Lincoln stood up for what is right, intellect, and continuous learning. Does Trump demonstrate any of Lincoln's values? I also asked what Lincoln's opinions are on asylum/immigration and taxes. Lincoln mentioned taxes in a speech, and asylum/immigration was an issue tackled in the 1864 Republican Platform. All this information is located in the National Archives. Point 8 the 1864 Republican Platform approved by Lincoln "8 Resolved, That foreign immigration, which in the past has added so much to the wealth, development of resources, and increase of power to the nation, the asylum of the oppressed of all nations, should be fostered and encouraged by a liberal and just policy." Abraham Lincoln Address to the 164th Ohio Regiment on August 18, 1864 "It is fair that each man shall pay taxes in exact proportion to the value of his property; but if we should wait before collecting a tax to adjust the taxes upon each man in exact proportion with every other man, we should never collect any tax at all." Shouldn't the Republican Party enforce Lincoln's vision? Continuous learning means members of the Republican Party should work to emulate Lincoln. It sounds to me that Lincoln, the founder of the Republican Party, was a liberal.
If the right woman ran, Condoleezza Rice (R), Tulsi Gabbard (I), Val Demings (D)….. I know people from both sides who would vote for all of these women…. I would vote for any of these woman.
Gabbard is now an R. No one wants Rice, as she represents the ousted Neocon leadership. She’s a relic of the Iraq War and 95% of Republican voters want nothing to do with that or the people who were involved
Why having a woman president so important to them why force it
It's a religion
WTF said it's by force? 🤨
Cult mentality.
Important to who?
@@trafalgalaw_lk3793 not one woman on that panel objects to boys in girls showers or toilets in school. So they aren’t feminist. They really don’t care about women, they care about power and following a cult philosophy.
It will be Tulsi gabbard
Love it!
She's Amazing ❤
Will likely be!
insert russian troll comment here
Hands down, so far it has to be Tulsi - she's just amazing
If a Republican woman runs for president will Democrats vote for her, or are they too sexist?
Not a chance .
When democrats say "woman" they don't mean only people who menstruate .
So if republicans nominate a real woman, the demoncrats will change the definition of a woman.
Im a democrat and voted all my life as one. It all depends on the candidate. The republican i would consider voting for is kelly ayotte of new hampshire but that depends on who she is running against on the democratic side. mind you i dont believe in all of her views. Another republican i would might consider is mia love of utah the congress women and I dont agree with all of her political views on church and state. But that is the difference is the a lot of republicans will come up with dumb reason not to vote for a women that is a democrat. It is always she is not the right women. So tell me which democrat women is the right one? Also as human a lot of people are sexiest and bias and just dont want to admit it. They are afraid of the consequences. That goes for every political party and person to a certain degree.
Will Republicans vote for her is the better question. Dems have an ideological reason to not vote for a GOP candidate.
@blackchairman2271 you are not straight in your opinion.
Imagine 2020 democrats had Tulsi but they made all excuses and gave America Biden.
Karmala was "joy" in a moment where Americans are losing jobs, fear losing jobs, struggling to put food on the table, pay bills, pay for housing, can't buy a home, can't get a raise, etc.. Americans wanted someone angry, who represented how they feel. She was out of touch with the public.
She was out of touch with being a democrat and ran as a diet republican.
@@Zayna-z4sit may have worked if she didn’t run as a ultra progressive in 2020 now switching to diet republican came off as totally disingenuous
So conservatives electing a rapist really represents the general feelings of Americans? Who'd want that kind of civilization to be allowed any freedoms in the world?
This is an excellent observation
Republicans think they’re going to do mass deportations without getting murdered as a response.
I’m doing the Trump Dance while watching CNN rating spiral down the toilet 😂
One is a garden tool and another is a war criminal
Mind Begs the Question:
▪︎If AIPAC influence/interfere
▪︎In USA Politics/Elections
▪︎USA President is picked by
▪︎Americans/USA or AIPAC/Israel?
If you hate it so much than why do you watch it?
@@aaroncalhoun337to laugh at liberals
Wait a year tariff boy😅😂
The lady in green is delusional and a borderline conspiracy theorist.
So glad you mentioned her. She speaks in a strange fashion.
I think she's a witch.
Right wingers are complaining about conspiracy theories 😅
@@Tomasalba-c6s "Joined 3 months ago"💀🤣
@@USMC-Goforth ok??
Tulsi Gabbard will be the next pretty easily and that’s what they fear 😅
Tulsi will be the first female president for the US
Mind Begs the Question:
▪︎Satan said Devils/Jinns are Superior Race
▪︎Hitler said Ariens are Superior Race
▪︎Those who hold Superior Race/Caste complex
▪︎Following - God or Satan?
@@WesJenkins518 that's ok she's awesome 👌
Tulsi Gabbard will become the first female president for 🇸🇾. 😂
Best choice
Remember when news was news and not opinion?
I heard CNN viewers moved over to the Comedy Channel. All 46 of them.
Yet here you are 🐑
@ it’s a hoot to watch these deranged people. Comedic panel speaking insane. They should move to Comedy Central.
MAGA working overtime trying to control the media again.
exactly
Imagine having your number one criteria for a President be gender?
r/whoosh 😒
Clearly the right prefer the male gender with a pasty complexion and experience not required. Any game show host can apply and win. 😂
Don’t forget skin color and who you bang!
so, being serious, it's not about that at all. it's just not limiting people from being a possibility because of gender, religion, race. you STILL gotta be a good candidate. i thought kamala was that. hillary though? guh. do not like. nope. so i'm not a dude and i'm telling you SURE i wanna see it happen but it's gotta be a good candidate. most of us would NOT use gender as the criteria. we just don't want it to be a blocker. that's it.
“The Democrat party is a professional fainting society.” - Scott Jennings.
Lt. Colonel Tulsi Gabbard
I think its Lt. Colonel Tulsi Gabbard - Right?
@@QuantumOfSolace1 right
Tulsi Gabbard-Putin.
There I fixed it for you. You’re welcome.
Yea tulsi gabbard duh
Some of these people would choke on their cornflakes if you mention Tulsi Gabbard.
Yes, it will be TULSI GABBARD. Cry dems for all the injustice you did to her.
She is a effin traitor.
@@PatrickJohn4825 If Democrats hate her she must be good.
Putin's friend....er ok
The right will choose another white male and make her VP AT BEST.
She will not be president.
It will be Tulsi Gabbard, not because she's a woman but because she has common sense and is smart unlike Kamala.
Gabbard is a Russian asset unlike Kamala.
Hmm .. ya your critical thinking skills are highly suspect. I would say both are complete wastes.
lmao come on man
Smart enough to align herself to Russia?
@@LDRINCAL exactly Gabbard a friend of the brutal dictator of Russia.
Is THAT what you want for the USA ?
AMERICA NEED SOMEONE LIKE TULSI GABARD TO BE PRESIDENT IF FEMALE ... CALM AND COOL
And smart and Amazing ❤
NEVER Happen in a million years! EVER!
Yeah with people like AOC, Dems women won't have no future 😂😂😂😂
😂😂😂
Trump supporters support her too in NY.
How about we elect the best person regardless of gender or race?
Dei is no good
Like we elected Trump? Is he not a DEI hire by white Americans?
But it’s almost like a black women will be called a dei regardless of if they’re qualified or not. The right will always say it’s affirmative action or wokeness. Even the black male Obama had to be exceptional to win, not just a good candidate. Are you telling me Joe Biden was better than Hillary and Kamala? Because they all went up against the same person but it was only the white man who won. That speaks for itself.
250 years and no women was ever the best person? DEI has worked out well for men 🤣
Ron Howard narration:
"We didn't..."
People don't really care about gender or race until a violent oligarch propagandist bought a $44 billion company to spew misinformation and propaganda to influence public opinion into the toilet
Condi Rice could have won easily but wouldn't run.
Being a rich person like Kamala or Hillary, woman or not, is the easiest thing to do in America. Zero hardship and a great easy life if they want it. These people are completely out of touch.
Tulsi gabbard , ok liberals ?
Yeah as long as you start learning Russian.
@@Andrina-fl9ef do you really believe such blatant b.s.
nah. do better. that's just sad. surely you got some better picks on your side. hell, even nancy mace is better (if she's not doing soundbyte bs.) like check her out in the ufo/uap congressional hearings. there, she really looks pretty legit. people could vote for that. but there's still GOTTA be some women up there that have exp (for real, exp) and aren't 80. kick the tires. gotta be SOMEONE in the party. there's so many people in congress.
I'd rather have someone who is actually qualified for the job. Yes, that used to be a thing before 2016, at least with Democrats.
Clinton is obviously giving a nod to Tulsi Gabbard. And this is highly ironic given that she likely would have ALREADY been had Dems nominated her in 2020. But instead went with Ol Cornpop and Kamalama.
Tulsi the Russian stooge
No he's not. That was likely said to put pressure on the right to consider a woman candidate, which I don't see happening ever. It's always been a white man. The only black man was a Democrat.
Oh man I bet this made the dems so mad. All of the sudden y’all don’t want a female president anymore huh? 😂
“Hillary tried to fashion herself like a Liz Cheney and it still wasn’t enough”
😂Jesus these guys are nowhere near the target 🤷🏻♂️
Why are the democrats stabbing each other?
The party is in disarray. Trump's not a threat to democracy!😂😂
Tulsi Gabbard
A weak candidate. Only had one debate moment. Didn't even make it to primaries. Her rallies are also boring as hell
@@isaacm2374 lol she single handedly ended Kamala's run. If wasn't for sleepy Joe, Kamala would be back in Cali being willie brown's side chick
@@WesJenkins518 Like I said one debate moment. That doesn't win you a presidency
I think someone like Margaret Thatcher and dats a Republican not whinny entitled liberal women .
@@isaacm2374 Lol Kamala Harris got like 800 votes in 2020 and y'all ran her for President, Gabbard will do great and will have my full support if she runs.
Tulsi 100%
Merit , not gender nor race
That's why Kamala lost.
In the twenty or so years since he left office I have never once heard anybody say "What does Bill Clinton think of this?" I am pretty sure there was a reason for that.
You don't get out much. Try changing the channel from Fox.
Harris had 3 1/2 years as VP to prove herself.
I would vote for a woman, as long as they are the right woman.
The vp is ceremonial job they have no power
Let me ask you what is the role of the vp in the constitution? The vp no matter what party in power dont have much to do. Only reason she was more active in her role is because it was 50/50. Like right now jd vance will be doing nothing but going to fundraisers because republicans in the senate has a 53 majority. I want republicans to be honest and say i just didnt like her and stop making excuses. Which women would you vote for? She has to run and win the primary? Let me guess it will be a republican women not some one else from a different party? Just be honest.
@@johndobbins2606Joe Biden is sharp as a tack... They have a mouth and a brain don't they ?
She was the right one
@@blackchairman2271 I don't like her. Never did. Never will.
If the right woman ran, Condoleezza Rice (R), Tulsi Gabbard (I), Val Demings (D)….. I know people from both sides who would vote for all of these women…. I would vote for any of these woman.
It will be a woman on the right, not because she's from the right but because she's qualified and she has common sense. Lol.
Riiiight. DT was hired with no experience. The right isn't looking for qualified, but male and white.
I'm not sure it's a good idea for Bill to get Marge and Bobos hopes up.
And feminists will ignore a GOP female president.
well it's a conundrum. if the party doesn't care about women's rights, and vote to take those away..... it detracts from a female candidate even if she seemed like a good one.
I disagree because Nikki Haley would have been the 2024 nominee if that were true.
Can Bill Clinton do us all a favor and just never say anything in public again? I mean come on.
He’s saying the Truth, whether you like it or not.
whats a matter? ole Bill likes some trim too
@@chisomahamba379 man, did you capitalize that reflexively because you're used to doing it in bible studies or something?
I don’t know what she’s talking about. Kamala wasn’t discredit Ted because she’s a female and she laughed. That’s like saying Trump was discredited for having hair that looks like a toupee, but that’s ok because he’s a man and it’s Trump. CNN you lost me. These people are so unreasonable and unwavering even when they are wrong
LOL have they not learn their lesson? The people care about the ECONOMY. This is not a race to see which side can elect a woman.
Kamala lost because of her wardrobe??
No pant suit. 🚫
and because she's not that bright.
Democrats identity politics moves on. Race and gender put everyone in a separate box.
No Nikki Hailey..
*Tulsi Gabbard.*
Nikki has no chance. It will be TULSI GABBARD
Susie Wiles will be the first female WH Chief of Staff; she's a Republican.
Madame President Tulsi Gabbard will make all true Americans proud.
Is she the only woman you know or are you joking?
@SMHannon100 Losers who don't know what a woman is are better off keeping their questions to themselves.
The general analysis is sooooooooo damn clichéd... There are plenty of Democratic female leaders who would have won against Trump with the proper campaign length, even Kamala Harris.
The question of "authenticity"... Really??? Think: Gretchen Whitmer, Elissa Slotkin... as authentically themselves as any male political, and twice as kick-ass than most!
100%!!!
Whitmer has led a massive outmigration since being elected. She is a Chyna shill.😂😂
After trump defeated Hilary no female politician in the country can defeat trump.
You think that freakshow Gretchen Whitmer would've beaten Trump 😂😂
The Joy stuff was out of nowhere and out of touch
And yet people thank late night hosts for the humor they bring in these times.
Go figure.
Don’t forget, this man cheated on his wife inside the oval office
He got his chicken choked and talked his way out of it on national television ! What a guy !
*I Remember when News were News and not opinions about gender and race.*
They have news also. It's a 24 hour channel with many shows and hosts. They're going to have opinion, relax.
It's because the left's got nothing else to offer.
Omggg! Who is this lady in green? Please stop dragging down all women with this idiocracy! Stop making all women look dumb! Kamala is weak! Accept it! Tulsi Gabbard for president 🫡
Still blaming misogyny 😂😂😂
It was expressed by one panel member. Good panel.
I 100% agree that the first woman President would have to be Republican
Not going to happen. She will be a democrat.
Yep, The track record agrees with this sentiment. Magaret Thatcher: Conservative, Angela Merkel: Conservative, Georgio Meloni: Conservative,
It won't be easy for a liberal woman(Democrat woman) to become president of US because the society see a Feminist instead of a woman when they think of a liberal American woman. That's the issue.
My hyper conservative Asian country had 2 female leaders who lead my country but they were all very traditional woman. They were not feminist at all. And all political parties in my country are socially conservative while Economical policies has differences. As I said it's because my country has a hyper conservative society.
So the point is life is easier for conservative women but a uphill battle for liberal women in all countries. That's why it's likely that first female President of US is going to be a Republican.
That makes a lot of sense. But there’s few liberals left in America. Women or men. They have transformed into a Rainbow Communist philosophy with big business driving their wagon.
So a conservative would be a more attractive candidate. In the end -- best qualified versus sex should be the deciding factor.
I don’t agree with everything that Tulsi advocates for, but I would definitely vote for her!
You would vote for a friend of our enemies?
Then a traitor of the USA ?
This whole topic is stupid fallacy: remember, Nikki Haley got nowhere. A Republican women would get just about the same. Until misogyny is addressed, every woman faces the same glass wall.
yea sure Bernie. Maybe people are sick of all the name calling like you just did there. Always got an excuse other than the truth, the left is run by a bunch of white elitist women who think they know whats best for their poor little serfs. WRONG
Not if Tulsi Gabbard had been the nominee
HELL NO NOT Nikki Howey are you kidding me?😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
The countless times I have heard "how education ruins women, women are too emotional, women are not respected," has taught me that this country isn't ready for a woman.
😂😂😂 I thought u were for all women 😂
😂😂😂
Did that lady say Harris has a nice laugh? And defended the childish Cackle? Yeah, that’s who we want on the international stage. Yikes.
I for the most part agreed with everyone on this round table. Wow!
😂😂😂😂 liberal women make abortion their biggest issue, which impacts 0.2% of pop annually. Then conservative women make big issues their priority. And the lady in the green is why fewer and fewer peopme watch cnn.
Nobody is talking about the fact that both women candidates for president were not truly elected. Hillary with the stupid super-delegates and Kamala with the last minute rush to the stage. All they have to do is let it happen democratically with the person truly winning the hearts and minds of either party.
Tulsi Gabbard 2028!
When will these libturds learn, calling an entire group of people misogynists is not going to help
TULSI 2028!!!
TULSI WILL BE MAGA PRESIDENT!! 😳🇺🇲❤
My former party doesn't know what a women is,
Children are saving their lunch money to buy CNN
Sarah Huckabee Sanders? Never. Nikki Haley? Yes.
Lol, Haley has no chance and he’ll and already had her run. No one wants except maybe you
The issue is making it seem like it is so important for a women to be president.
That assumes liberal women would vote for a conservative woman. That’s assuming a lot.
Why would they? It's a foolish thing to even discuss.
Cnn trying not to fail hahaha they can only fail.
Bill Clinton sees the writing on the wall. The country is shifting to the right center right
The Explainer in Chief could have explained the spike in prices post-pandemic better than any politician alive.
Well considering men particularly whyte men like myself hold great disdain for whyte Liberal woman even my sister. So he might have a point. Whyte men will not listen to a lying deceitful Liberal woman.
bill clinton is a very smart guy. he knows the type of woman a man can tolerate
Kamala and Hillary were absolutely held to a different standard than any male we’ve put forth as a candidate for president.
@GeorgieGirl1028, Kamala had every opportunity to be on national television, do interviews and podcasts. Instead all you got was a billion dollar concession speech and a 20 million dollar bar tab.
As someone who is conservative I do absolutely agree that both Kamala and Hillary were held to different standard than any man but I think their 'record' on matters or lack thereof cost them both. Either way, I would never vote for a woman because I am a woman too. Sorry, but when you want to preside over the most powerful country in the world, your RACE and GENDER MUST NOT be tools to be used or matters to be considered.
*They were both held at NO standar.*
can you list these stardards so we can go through them. Demoncrats did not field a good candidate. Women want equal treatment and then complain when they get it. By the way why are we even arguing, Trump is going to transition into a woman and run again. lol
Just the fact that a barely coherent Biden beat Trump but both Kamala and Hillary lost to him just shows how much of the bar is higher for a female candidate
Yeah they’d run the country with logic and common sense not out of control emotions 😆
Republicans vote for best candidate that’s not a DEI candidate
If Tulsi Gabbard were the Democrat nominee in 2020 she would've been the first woman president. Being serious, authentic and intelligent is more important as a leader than be a cackling buffoon.
How can I block CNN on TH-cam?
The lady in green is spot on correct!
America getting a biological woman president would be a good move, especially for countries that follow America often and treated women unfairly.
That makes sense.
DEI is DOA. Trump is leading the Age of Enlightenment.
Trump is not leading an Age of Enlightenment, and I can prove it through research and history. To lead the age of enlightenment, you have to conduct yourself using John Lockes values. Donald Trump doesn't have one of John Locke's values. Abraham Lincoln revered our founders. He learned our founders values and conducted his governance using their values.
The Gemini AI definition of "enlightenment" is
"The Enlightenment was a philosophical movement that emphasized reason, individualism, and skepticism. It challenged traditional authority and advocated for progress, tolerance, and human rights."
There are a total of 20 values and principles that make up John Locke's Enlightenment. Locke created an exclusive definition for each term. They are:
Reason, Empericism, Skepticism, Individualism, Secularism, Progress, Natural Rights, Liberty, Equality, Consent of the Governed, Limited Government, The Rule of Law, Separation of Powers, Religious Tolerance, Social Contract, Justice, Self-Ownership and Property, Economic Liberty, Education, Pragmatism
Our founders embraced the Enlightenment because they observed monarchs and theocrats to be oppressive and dictatorial. The founders took these values and principles and placed them in a social contract, then encased it in a democratic republic. Our founders weaved their values and principles throughout our foundational documents.
When a person swears an oath to the Constitution, that oath is also being applied to the Declaration of Independence and the Bill of Rights. That political leader swears he/she will govern using the values and principles of our founders and John Locke, NOT Christianity. The founders did not want there country to be controlled by religious dogma. This is verified in Article XI of the Treaty of Tripoli: “As the government of the United States of America is not in any sense founded on the Christian religion."
There are 2 rules in John Locke's Enlightenment that the government and the people it protects are expected to have the honor and character to utilize; they are "individual liberties" and "public good."
Public Good
In an enlightened society, citizens are required to understand and accept their responsibility to sacrifice certain liberties and personal well-being for the protection of others-such as taking up arms in wartime (with exceptions for pacifists) or wearing protective gear and accepting vaccines during health crises. The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted how a lack of adherence to these values allowed the virus to spread due to selfish refusals to protect others. An enlightened government’s primary role, as defined by John Locke, is to safeguard individual life, liberty, and self-governance from coercive, reckless, or tyrannical actions by individuals, groups, or the state.
Individual Liberty
Liberty as defined by John Locke's Enlightenment
1. Natural Rights
Life, Liberty, and Property: Every individual possesses inherent rights, including the right to life, liberty, and property. These rights are fundamental and must be respected by govt.
2. Freedom from Oppression
Political Liberty: means being free from arbitrary power and oppression. Individuals should not be subjected to the whims of others, particularly those in positions of authority.
3. Consent and Governance
Social Contract: Locke argued that legitimate govt is based on the consent of the governed. People enter a social contract to form a govt that protects their rights. If a govt fails to do so, citizens have the right to revolt.
4. Individual Autonomy
Self-Governance: Liberty includes the ability to make choices regarding one’s own life and property. Individuals should have the autonomy to pursue their own interests as long as they do not infringe upon the rights of others.
Our schools failed the founders when they did not teach us these values and principles. That is why the country is in a mess
Patriotism is knowing, supporting, protecting, and growing the values, principles, and vision of our founders for the country they gifted us so we can pass their vision on to future generations.
A reminder to conservatives that Abraham Lincoln started the Republican Party. Why aren't Republicans conducting themselves according to Lincoln's values?
I asked Microsoft Copilot, "What are Abraham Lincoln's values?" It sourced the following: Abraham Lincoln's Classroom, Museum Lincoln College, GOACTA, and Britannica
It returned with the following:
Equality, individual rights, a unified nation, liberty, the rule of law, charity, compassion and forgiveness, humility, honesty, integrity, and courage: Lincoln stood up for what is right, intellect, and continuous learning.
Does Trump demonstrate any of Lincoln's values?
I also asked what Lincoln's opinions are on asylum/immigration and taxes. Lincoln mentioned taxes in a speech, and asylum/immigration was an issue tackled in the 1864 Republican Platform. All this information is located in the National Archives.
Point 8 the 1864 Republican Platform approved by Lincoln
"8 Resolved, That foreign immigration, which in the past has added so much to the wealth, development of resources, and increase of power to the nation, the asylum of the oppressed of all nations, should be fostered and encouraged by a liberal and just policy."
Abraham Lincoln Address to the 164th Ohio Regiment on August 18, 1864
"It is fair that each man shall pay taxes in exact proportion to the value of his property; but if we should wait before collecting a tax to adjust the taxes upon each man in exact proportion with every other man, we should never collect any tax at all."
Shouldn't the Republican Party enforce Lincoln's vision?
Continuous learning means members of the Republican Party should work to emulate Lincoln.
It sounds to me that Lincoln, the founder of the Republican Party, was a liberal.
Expand. Enlightened how....Matt Gaetz enlightened? MTG enlightened? My pillow & Rudy Gulliani enlightened?
They used to say the same thing about the first black president.
What party was Obama from again?
It depends on the woman and the moment.
What did he do for the black people though?
@@peekosthenamenothing at all
We've never had a black American president or vice president.
I can't believe I watched this entire clown segment.
The Republican women have better character, Democratic women seem angry, sour and dour, not too happy.
Surfing the "Blue Wave" of TEARS. 🏄♂️
Alright CNN, Women cant be presidents, I agree.
We still want Kamala.
I rarely agree with Bill but he’s correct.
Hillary Clinton wasn't likable
Hopefully it'll be Tulsi Gabbard.
I doubt it, however.
She's loathed by the establishment.
So is Trump
Tulsi Gabbard for first female president!
We are done with old democracy WE THE PEOPLE NEED THE NEW and WE have spoken!!
I was always thinking Bill Clinton is the 1st woman ever been elected to president lol
Bill promised her an intern position
If the right woman ran, Condoleezza Rice (R), Tulsi Gabbard (I), Val Demings (D)….. I know people from both sides who would vote for all of these women…. I would vote for any of these woman.
Gabbard is now an R. No one wants Rice, as she represents the ousted Neocon leadership. She’s a relic of the Iraq War and 95% of Republican voters want nothing to do with that or the people who were involved
I've always felt this too.
They really can't stop on identity politics
Notice how the new and improved Kamala hasn't been anywhere in the headlines. What never was meant to be, is no more.