Naval Legends: Sovetsky Soyuz | World of Warships
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 28 ก.ย. 2024
- 📖 Historical ships in the game 👉 wo.ws/3kAwWlZ
🔔 / @worldofwarshipsoffici...
New episode of Naval Legends will tell you the story of Soviet Battleship Sovetsky Soyuz.
How did the Russian Navy plan to rise from ashes?
Naval Legends is a series about the construction, service, and daring deeds of legendary 20th-century ships.
Series playlist: • Naval Legends | World ...
Join this channel to get access to perks:
/ @worldofwarshipsoffici...
⚓⚓⚓
Keep an eye out on the official World of Warships website: wo.ws/website
Follow us on
/ worldofwarshipscom
/ discord
/ worldofwarships
/ worldofwarships
/ worldofwarships
/ worldofwarships
/ worldofwarships
/ worldofwarships
Did you enjoy the new episode?
Subscribe, so you wouldn't miss new episodes of Naval Legends!:)
What is the song you use in the video?
@@hrmsholland5842 Yeah like a dutch tech tree and the ships in the tech tree is these:
Premium Cruiser Tier IV
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HNLMS_De_Ruyter_(1935)
Premium Destroyer Tier V
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HNLMS_Isaac_Sweers
Almost wanted to say that it looks so real
Makes naval legends video about Soviet battleship that would have never have been completed. Still hasn’t made naval legends video on any British battleship, you know the largest navy in the world at that time. And not 1 mention of ANY German ships of any kind. Come on WOWS you’re better than this, give us some naval legends of Warspite, Hood and Bismarck.
I'd rather watch this than the history channel. Love all the historical videos.
"Naval Legend". SO how many battles did it take part in? Or even better how many shots did it fire?
Well.... 0
@@mahiro-san6862 Well, Its the only battleships that has never missed a shot then :D
@@bolastube yep for sure :)
As many as Super Conqueror and T54E1.
dude its sowjet stalinum, it still fights today :D
"They were atleast designed to be the best. Their designers met their captors face to face, enduring gulag working hours but still enjoying bathroom breaks. They went down in history due to the existance of an archive. They are the ships that deserved to be called wishlist legends."
Perfection
LMFAO
Lmao
Gold
1 huge legendary clap for you!!
As much as the CGI is great,you don’t really call a ship that wasn’t really built a “Naval Legend”
But as I said the CGI was great
By "Legend", they mean "Myth". Good-lookin' ship tho
I agree. I didnt even know of it until I saw it in a mobile game.
How about tanks that were never built?
i really thought it was a real ship. wow
Now they have no Excuse for not doing Bismarck, Roma, Hood etc. If a Non-existent Ship can get an Episode, a sunken one can get one aswell.
Hundreds of ships battled in ww2
> make naval legends about a ship that didn't even exist
this is insulting.
She did exist though? What are you saying? I think you mean she was incomplete but she was a very much real ship
@@battleship6049 I think the idea was that the Sovetzky Soyuz never completed and thus cannot be called a legend because she never earned a name for herself.
@@SenkanYamato39 I can understand that but saying she never existed is incorrect. She ain't no legend though. As a matter of fact she's a pretty trash ship
@@battleship6049 well I didn't say she didn't exist. She clearly did as a design and was partially built.
@@battleship6049 really, ever this ship not exist (ever is been laid down) and you say it "Trash Ship" so you going say UK, US, Germany, Japan is better ship huh? You very disrespect to ship designer and worker russia(Soviet).
They work so hard for this and this is you give word to them a"Trash Ship"?! Fuck you
"Not a single great country considered the Soviet Union an enemy they might battle on the Sea..." might sound like the West was underestimating the Soviets, but it's not like they were wrong...
True
In the Cold War they damn sure were.
Nope. All according to the common agenda.
One rifle per three turrets? Check.
Enforcement via repression threats? Check.
Not a single piece of technology of own development? Check.
@@RampantFury925 and during the Cold War, NATO accounted for them. Just in the interwar era, the Soviets didn't have any serious naval capacities and no means of procurring anything useful anytime soon. This whole video, while admitting that the plans were a bit optimistic glances over glaring issues. For example comparing the ship with contemporaries, Yamato was left right out, because it was obviously way more powerful, and in comparing to Iowa, they first try to point out that in the theatres these ships mostly would've served in, the Baltic and Arctic Seas, visibility limited practical engagement ranges, then they go and brag how Sovietsky Soyuz outranged the Iowa. Or how we know from the Italians with their 381 mm guns that have similar range that most of that range is never going to be useful because you won't hit anything really. They also don't mention what 830 m/s meant in terms of barrel wear and how for example H-39s German twin turrets may be fewer, but had a higher RoF. Nor did they touch on how Sovietsky Soyuz seemingly needed engine power rivalled only by the Iowa-class, to propel their ship to a staggering 28 knots. Lion and Yamato got comparable speeds on vastly less engine power, Iowa actually achieves cruiser-like speeds. Thankfully ingame the ships are pretty ok, if we ignore the Pobeda...
@@TheKnownPlayer Correction, ONE such gun barrel per ENTIRE SSSR.
17:35 Ok so there are some pretty massive issues with the information that you present,
1
The information presented is what is given in the design, which is usually quite optimistic - particularly for new naval powers who's designers don't have much experience, whereas the Iowa was actually built and while the Lion wasn't built it was going to be built by a power which had significant experience in naval design and therefore likely would have gotten closer to its design specs than seen here. For much the same reasons ships built by new naval powers tend to have at least some major flaws in their design
2
High velocity guns were not necessarily an advantage at this time as high velocity weapons tended to be highly inaccurate, you also completely ignored shell design (which can have a massive effect on the penetration of shells) and their effectiveness, furthermore the fire control systems of the US and UK would likely have been significantly superior to what the soviets designed as the UK and US had more experience and technical expertise. (In particularly UK shells of the period were excellent with significantly greater explosive payloads than their counterparts meaning that shells did more damage per hit)
3
While the thickness of armour on US and UK battleships would have been inferior the naval armour technology of the US and in particular UK and Germany was significantly superior to that of the USSR so the armour advantage would have been far less significant than the numbers suggest.
Additionally the distributed armour scheme of the ships (while not a crippling weakness) was a flaw and would have resulted in hits which on other battleships would have over-penetrated (doing relatively minimal damage) detonating in the ship.
4
The range advantage is utterly meaningless US fire control at the end of world war 2 was massively superior to the USSR's and even then the US concluded that any engagement at distances over around 30,000 yards were utterly pointless because you wouldn't hit anything
Overall even with the best possible luck the Sovetsky Soyuz would not have been anywhere near as good as this line up suggests, and it would likely have been inferior to the designs of other nations due to design flaws and inefficiencies caused by lack of experience of their designers (you can have designers who are as skilled and work as hard as you like but if they don't have experience they are going to make mistakes)
Therefore it is highly misleading to present this information without any of this context as it makes a ship which would likely have been middling or poor sound fantastic
I bet the North Carolina could beat the Sovetsky Soyuz despite it being 2 BB generations earlier.
well done , sir.
This failure of a ship type by the Soviet Navy had virtually no impact whatsoever on history or the design of future battleships since the Soviets were incapable of making a structurally sound ship that could contend with other ships already in service. I understand you are a Russian company and want to have pride in your history, but fabricating what you wish this battleship would have been through the tint of rose colored glasses is just silly. There are a ton of other ships that were actually built in real life and served in combat that deserve to have their stories told over some Soviet pipe dream of actually completing a single working battleship.
Dude wargaming belarussians not Russians (even though many Russians work there). But Lesta (Wow dev studio is indeed Russians).
There is also the fact that even if this ship had been built, she would have joined the German/British/Japanese/American/French/Italian WWII battleships in being utterly pointless and a waste of money.
It created big impact on Soviet Union.
There was no such ships in USSR before, because you know, USSR didn't have colonies that she needed to protect. However, It caused big impact on industry. I understand that maybe you want all videos about US Navy, but man, there are other countries that also wanted to build something like that. Not to mention that USSR had bad industry as heritage from Tsarist Russian Empire. You must understand feelings of people different countries too and their history.
It was a big advance for a whole country. In order to build something like that, you must, for example, build big crane and etc., basically create new industrial sector from zero. In just 10-15 years. In country that has a lot more problems to fix. But still, they started to create them (its guns, for example are real and stationed in russian weapon test field). Yet again, its a legend machine, USSR superweapon like german Tirpitz or Bismarck. Of course, its never saw combat thanks to german Invasion.
But i can't say that her german "counterparts" have big naval history too thanks to carriers and submarines. For example, Tirpiz was at her port in Norway almost all time and did almost nothing.
@@licrygh Agreed, even a design like this is monumental.
@Ivan Karaschuk
oh well, at least Stalin has his priorities set right in this instance lol...Nazi land advance finished this already outdated pipe dream battleship plans and made soviets pump all of their resources into rugged reliable actual war winning tanks...
Wargaming keeps feeding us with so much Soviet Propaganda and Russian Bias that I'm starting to think McCarthyism wasn't such a bad idea.
Keep it up WG, you are alienating you entire fanbase with this, of course except your beloved Russian players.
A laid out scrap of metal pushed as NAVAL LEGEND; pfft, okay.
Pedro Casas All the Russians do. It's their recently gone empire. Although the Romanovs would be a better choice
“Whoever does not miss the Soviet Union has no heart,” Russian President Vladimir Putin famously said in 2010. But he quickly added, “Whoever wants it back has no brain.”
@@captainnutt2995 So passionate against McCarthy that you didn't know his name ends with y. Makes me wonder if you know anything about the red scare at all. lol
@@SovietUnion100 Says the indoctrinated from birth , for generations, soviet puppet citizen. Soviet Russia, no propaganda here. No police state here.
@@j.chiari4222 actually, the Romanov dynasty treated the peasants worse than the Soviets (except for Stalin)
Naval legend of what? Fighting in the Stalin's wet dreams? How funny WG, how funny...
Big moustaches wet dream now becoming true on WOWS.
Send this guy to gulag
@@SovietUnion100 No need to react to propaganda stamps
Agano to gulag plz f off
@@SovietUnion100 What makes you think the comment is made by American? Idiot
I swear you are beter of to just remove these ''soviet ships'' from the game 90% of them didnt even exist plus your history preformance in Naval Warfare is laughable, the only real purpose these things have is catering to your own Russian audience. Honestly getting kind of fed up with this soviet ''what if'' nonsense when you talk about Naval Warfare in ww2 the Soviet navy is the last thing anyone mentions.
"The rest of the world didn't see us as a potential rival" They still remembered the second Pacific Squadron...
@@jonathanwhiteacre7046 The "voyage of the damned" so much incompetence gathered in one fleet.
They are turning World of Warships into Red Alert. Communist symbols everywhere. This is going even deeper than inserting 1950-60 ships into WWI-II game - making Soviet BB so much stronger than really existing (and in reality much more advanced) ships is just both sad and pathetic.
It makes sense only if you understand the word "legend" as "fairy tale"... :(
@@sdfoxy007 no one is forcing you to play with the soviet branch soy boy
I dont want a million Fletchers or Clevelands.
Ideas for Naval Legends
King George V, Duke of York or Prince of Wales ,Warspite, Vanguard, Bismarck, Nagato, Kongo, Prinz Eugen, Graf Spee, Enterprise
Missouri, Wisconsin, Roma, Sydney etc.
WG: did you say paper ship?
The Bismarck are not bad
King Battleship Three of the Four built Iowa’s got one (never knew why they skipped Wisco) but still it hurts because she’s considered quite a safe ship in multiple wars
They did the Mighty Mo?
I’ve never seen it
King Battleship yes look for it
Can’t seem to find it
USSR: Lets build big fleet
Also USSR: Lets kill all engineers, mechanicians and every one else Who has a clue how to build ship.
Everybody: C'mon WeeGee she wasnt even finished.
Me: This proves that they can and will do Naval Legends about ships that sadly do not exist as museums (aka sunk or scrapped), the possibilities.
Even worse than a hypothetical episode of Naval Legend: Vanguard.
Naval Legend: a ship that wasn't even completed.
wait, are you putting the HMS Vanguard in the same category as a ship that was not completed?
really, the HMS Vanguard? the last battleship built and launched in the world
How are you even comparing the two?
@@armandorodrigues144 I guess, because Vanguard never saw action?
Armando Rodrigues
Vanguard was obsolete when laid down (because battleships in general were obsolete at that point) and did absolutely nothing.
i think they mean 'naval legend' as things like the G, H class of ships, Montana, A-150, lion, UP 41 etc. those ships are Naval legends because of What ifs and how awesome they might have been amongst the fanbase of naval warships and so-forth. so in they're own way they are a legend.
so if they are implementing these types of ships, maybe well even get the Churchill heavy cruiser or the cockatoo heavy cruiser (please implement this!)
Matt Faulk I don’t think you understand what I’m saying, what I’m saying is the fact that the design exist has had many people interested in these types of ships,
Like Montana never existed and people whom are interested in American battleship design will always go ‘I wonder what it would have looked like in reality and not a tacky model from the 1940’s’ same goes for the sovyetsky Soyuz,
Please, next an episode about the Enterprise...
... I mean, maybe you can do 7 about THEM: NXX-01, NCC-1701, NCC-1701 A, NCC-1701 B, NCC-1701 C, NCC-1701 D and NCC-1701 E.
As finctional are them like the Sovetsky Soyuz, those "Enterprise" have a longer history.
Please ad eved sunken warships like enterprise,tirpitz,ark royal,implacable,bismark,nelson,prince eugen,arkansas,pensacola,northtampton, and others and also submarines. Thank you
When did Enterprise sink ? But yeah , she's a real naval legend !
*prinz eugen and its bismarck*
Well, in reality you did'nt build anything.
During the same time period the Soviet bb.s were planned and laid down in the USA 10 US bb.s were planned, laid down and launched. The North Carolina class 2 ships North Carolina and Washington. Tthe South Dakota class 4 ships South Dakota, Massachusetts, Alabama and Indiana. The Iowa class Iowa, New Jersey, Missouri and Wisconsin. If you claim that the Soviet union was the worlds biggest industrial power that is a staement that does not quite correspond with real facts. In the same time US undustry armed all the western allies with tanks, airplanes, halftracks, trucks etc and in the same time built the fast carrier task forces: four carriers, six to eight support vessels and not less than 18 destroyers, preferably 24. And at the same time the US industry could supply the homefront with various consumer goods, something the Soviet industry never could.
@@trident6547 Generally, the SU had to rebuild every possible production from scratch after the revolution in 1917 (financed by Germans). Speed of industrialization was unique - practically no other country in history was able to repeat such performance. I know, it doesn't match with common western narrative, but try to get over it - speak to scientists or people who used to live in the USSR. And regarding your listing of carriers and destroyers: the Soviet Union understood itself a continental country. Compare T-34 and M3 Lee tank designs. Any other questions?
@@nexotron4121
No you don't compare M3 Lee/M4 with a T-34. Just like you don't Rambo into Germany when you cripple their entire industry with bombings.
"Speak to scientists?" Well, if that's your only way to hear about "science" ...
T-34 is good on paper only (but you must be a short Chang so you might fit into one). It was good for Russia and Soviet strategy. M4 had one of the highest crew survival rates after getting hit and no magic helped T-34s against an 88mm.
So no, no questions for mediocre answers.
@@solomonarbc "No you don't compare M3 Lee/M4 with a T-34." --> And we both know why ;)
"Speak to scientists?" Well, if that's your only way to hear about "science" ... --> bla-bla-bla
"T-34 is good on paper only (but you must be a short Chang so you might fit into one)." --> Well, germans experiences this in different way:
www.welt.de/geschichte/zweiter-weltkrieg/article156844134/Der-T-34-Panzer-traf-die-Wehrmacht-wie-ein-Monster.html
you may be surprised, but discovery channel sees this in the same way - th-cam.com/video/fVg6gFmuRlE/w-d-xo.html
So, dude, don't consider this offending, but you may want to reconsider what you learned about the Soviet Union or Russia at school. I do live in the West, but there is so much rubbish info about the country and history related to it. As Winston Churchill said: "History will be kind to me, for I intend to write it."
@@nexotron4121 yeah, you were continental. Guess who lend-leased you 92% of your "continental" railroad equipment and 57% of your total equipment, equating to 11 billion dollars? While simultaneously building said battleships?
The Sovetsky Soyuz deserves it's title as a naval legend for it was the most powerful battleship ever laid to be designed by the Russian navy at that time and the impact it made on the industrial capabilities for this time period. Just because it was not even built does not mean its concept wasn't used they clearly said the gun during the siege of Leningrad was utilized as an artillery battery that destroyed many German bunkers and ammunition supplies
The CGI is amazing. But you could have chosen October Revolution Battleship. At least that one existed
Now I want to see a "naval legends" episode of that German H-39 ship. was the drawing finished? good enough for me!
and don't forget the Super Yamato (design A-150), lol. I'm sure it would be "legendary" too
Don't forget our t10 Ferdinando Cassone or Edgardo Ferrati!
@@belladesa91 There's probably a ship called Ferrari buried deep in the archives. Can you imagine the sales that thing would get, with a shiny red camo.
How the hell is a Battleship that never left the drawing board because the ruskys couldn't figure out how to efficiently mount the amour on the damn ship a naval legend???? Naval legend implies that the ship actually did something. The only thing notable done by anything related to this ship was that the guns were used as field artillery.
USSR:Hey can i copy ur homework?
USA:Yeahbut dont make It to obvious
I don't get it why a paper ship is in a Naval Legends video
So, what is the legends??
the ship never build?
soviet industry??
the gun on land
the idea on paper??
or the guys make the CGI??
This series is awesome! Sad they never built this thing but then same with the Montana. Technology was moving so fast that by the end of the war, battleships were no longer needed.
WOW! It is hard for me to believe the push back your getting for this content! This has been great and I loved the episode. Keep up all the great work!
Could you imagine Stalin disguised as a shipwright in Hamburg or Marseille building and studying ships going by Joey.
Damn the CGI visuals looks amazing. WOW!!!
I love these videos but I would advise making a Naval legends video on ships are are actually naval legends... or at least built.
I actually don’t mind videos on ships that where at least started but I would like to see ships like Bismarck and Roma take priority
Naval legend talking about a battleship that never become a legend at all... XD
Please talk more about IJN carrier fleet
That CG is just amazing !!
If this can be on Navel Legends...
WHERE IS MONTANA??
Lol Naval legend? More like naval mythology
*naval propaganda*
lol.... sup jake
As legend=myth lol
Could've done a video on the Michelangelo Buonarroti at this point, we already have enough paper ships, at least it would've been a breath of fresh air.
I love how they still haven’t done a Enterprise CV-6 Naval Legends video after all these years.
The in-game description for the ship is literally nothing more than a fantasy:
"The largest gunship ever built in the USSR"....(except it wasn't ever built)...
...."(Project 23) and one of the most powerful battleships in the world." (Still would've been outclassed by Iowa)...
...."She differed from the prototype, Battleship A" (which also never existed),
...."with her larger size and more sophisticated armament systems" (which were never built and would've lagged behind western systems as well).
its WG, when it comes to Russian weaponry they will lie as easily as they breathe
well, she WAS laid down. she was never finished in reality (they only built the skeleton of the Hull and that's it. She was then scrapped) And according to a deeper research i did, tho thsese ships never existed outside of paper, their main battery did somewhat exist (Not really but there are some variants) but to make it short, This ship went undergoing construction but they scrapped the idea just 24 hours later.
Naval Legends... about those -poor overworked wage slave- glorious hero-engineers of the soviet republic!
I mean with they way the videos described it, those guy were true Legends (if not the Naval kinds lol).
Main battery, 495 mm.... right... like the Soviet Union could have built a gun like that that wouldn't completely shatter upon firing.
I do really love the CGI of soyuz on real world implementation. best so far.
Sovetsky soyuz resembles North calorina for me. The superstructure, the side guns. it resembles it greatly
What's the gramaphone music at the begining?
it's really funny when they say all these great things about it and follow it up with if she was built.
With the argument of what if's. Why not compare to Montana class not iowa
I'm confused. The greatest battleship in the world? Outperformed anything the USA, Britain, or Germany ever sent into combat? Yet it never existed. There is a difference between capability, even in testing, and an actual combat record.
Ships for naval legends
- Bismarck ❎
- Scharnhorst ❎
- Warspite ❎
- Enterprise ❎
- Hood ❎
- Some ship that never existed ✅
Naval Legends: Bismarck next?
Honestly Soyuz is one of the most real ships in the paper line.
Torpedo bulge stolen from italy design
@@kikekike2558 How?
@@kikekike2558 Yeah the russians took a lot of their ideas from the Italiens. As the video stated they really didn't know how to build modern battleships so they copied and compared to the leading naval nations.
Clashma n basically a carbon copy of the UP.41 Italian 406mm gun Battleship notice how oddly similar it is to Littorio? Big think isn’t it?
@@timber_wulf5775 Atleast the hull and individual guns were built.
I think the HMS Rodney would have been the match for this Russian Battleship. It was modern big and fast and had the 16 inch 40 caliber radar controlled guns the others did not.
Rodney? Fast?
The Endgame trailer music in the background though.
The CGI is just 👌👌👌👌
Can I continue the ship name with a song?? :V
Awesome series love the video look forward to more
Btw the Iowa’s had a max amor of 431.8 to 482.6 mm depending on the place
Good vid. Thanks for the upload.
"Naval legend"! I laughed.
Though a lot of people didn't know it by WWII the battleship was largely obsolete and the aircraft carrier is what they needed however it is worth noting that in rough seas common on Soviet coastlines trying to launch or land planes would have been murder and that is not a figure of speech.
What lovely fiction... A legend worthy of bookshelves.
This is going to be one of the most powerful type of Battleship in the world, if at least one or two has been made during that time.
So you're a farmer? Well today you build battleships.
Wargaming:Makes anything about the soviet navy no matter if it involves paper or actual ships.
Comunity:Reeeeee why did you do this we want actual ships
Also comunity when wargaming adds a Japannese, US or German paper ships:Cool
If you guys were going to do a video on a warship for which there is no remaining floating example, you didn't think to do one on CV-6 Enterprise or Warspite before a paper ship?
This episode is interesting but it will be nicer if you guys can do more about the real legends, the one was laid down and launched, fought and fell. Kongo class battlecruiser, the Nagatos, Bismarck,the real existed Gangut class Battleships with quite an eventful career, KGVs and so on. ^^
Yes, i have subscribed & i'm beginning to like this channel & documentaries. More power & good luck!!!
Damn WG, I could watch your CGI for days
Imagine if the Sovetsky Soyuz were built, how would it compare or compete against the American Iowa-class battleships?
Is there a problem for naval legends showing a ship that is not completed? I think its interesting to others in order to know its history and why it is not completed.
0:50 Great intro to soviet battleship Sovetsky Soyuz amazing ship
Yeah, this episode REALLY telegraphs where the company is out of. Not only did they do an episode on a ship class that was never built and never saw combat, but theres also the exaggeration of the capabilities and extent of the program compared to other nations. Project 23 was cancelled by the war in 1941, but they compare it to a US project from several years prior. The actual US comparison to the Soyuz would have been the cancelled Montana class. 2 of the 5 ships were ordered but construction was delayed by Pearl Harbor in 1941 and repair efforts on the pacific fleet and then cancelled after the US realized just how little impact the BBs were going to have on the war. That class has 12 guns instead of the 9 on Soyuz, similar armor thickness, similar speed, larger displacement and far superior AA defenses. And any gun handling characteristic advantages on the soviet ship are quickly rushed aside by the fact that the USN BBs were carrying BATS**T, PANTS ON HEAD CRAZY NUCLEAR SHELLS after 1956. Pretty sure 15 kiloton nuclear warhead beats whatever AP the Soviets had
Considering that the turrets of HMS Royal Sovereign were rusted in place when she was returned to the British I think it is safe to say that the Sovetskys would sink without any "outside help"...
They would have the problem which should be compromised to unpredicted technological problem.
Which is, for example, KGV’s second main battery gun.
I mean, could they make exact ship proposed in blueprint?
The guy stating it was the 3rd best naval gun is incorrect the British had there own 18 inch gun in service that I believe could put perform it from the furious or courageous on the were placed on board a monitor or land battery I can't remember which 1
And he ignored the German 16 inch gun aswell..
If wargaming makes a Naval Legends episode of an uncompleted ship, I would like to see Actual Naval Legend ships that were sunk.
What's next the Tillman Battleship
s?
2:40 sorry the Dunkerque did not have 9 guns
Is there any proof that this triple turret actually works?
Or would it be like how the kgv quad turret had problems firing
Soviets should have completed the Soyuz. It's one of the best battleship.
The USSR was not even capable of making cemented steel above 9inches at this time lmao. It would we 9 inches of armor and rest would be pretty much soft steel. This ship is something the Soviet Union at the time did not have the industry and knowledge to build propperly. I would rate the British 15Inch 45 guns to be just as capable to these, nvm the US 16" 46 and 50. Perhaps even the German Siegfried cannons.
Naval Legend = one artillery "ground" cannon
CGI is great, but this should be in another section of the channel XD
how about a montana episode
Is the ship still standing
How about the USS Iowa,isn’t this state of the art too?
2:35 Is that the Avengers: Endgame Trailer music I'm hearing?
Why 406mm guns for a T9 -_-
Naval legends Tillman maxim when
Oh wait the video of USS Iowa is on my right lol.
Isn't the number of heavy AA guns rather atrocious? Even the Scharnhorst class, laid down 5 years earlier, has 14, and is also just 25.000 tons lighter.
You know, when the only "Plane on Ship" engagement was some rigged test with the Dreadnought SMS Thüringen, stationary, without crew, and all compartment doors open.
Story about what would be. Can you do videos about battleships that have was put in service? I would like Roma :)
What war did these ship fought?
None lol. These were never built
Maybe they can do a video on the Tillman's
That looks like some good old propagandalf clip.
H42 have the capability though of penetrating Sovetsky Soyuz due to carrying the 420 mm gun. She can penetrate the Russian ship at the boundary of mid range and close range.
It’s adorable that you guys think the Soviet Union ever had this sort of shipbuilding capacity
Another point not brought up was that the pathetic Soviet steel mills were utterly incapable of producing superior armor plating, known as "krupp" armor
This armor was found historically on the Bismarck, which had to be sunk by the crew, and Tirpitz, who survived a gigantic hole in the hull- the original "Krupp" company was German.
The Soviet ships have thick armor on paper, but because they used the much more limited, brittle, "cemented" armor, they would not have had the endurance of foreign counterparts, and would not have been able to withstand a strike from their *_own guns_*
0:14 can anyone tell me what that flag in background represents?
Cgi was cool, but I think it’s kinda dumb to do ships that never existed before you’re even done doing some ships that actually existed. Maybe do a separate series for never built ships, and include these in that series?
So at the end of the day, how many battleships and carriers did the great soviet union built?
Dear WG, please stick to the truth. The statement at 12:46 is plain false. The germans did very well build and operate 406mm guns of the SK C/34 type.
So good CGI