Kongsberg at Indo Pacific 2022: NSM for Royal Australian Navy
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 21 ส.ค. 2024
- Coverage of the Kongsberg Defence & Aerospace booth at Indo Pacific 2022; the international maritime exposition in Sydney, Australia. Australia approved in April the procurement of Naval Strike Missile (NSM) for its in-service Anzac-class frigates and Hobart-class destroyers.
=====================
Representatives from the company shared more details on this new NSM contract and what makes this next generation anti-ship missile unique. They also mentioned the StrikeMaster project which is a truck-mounted NSM launcher. We also discussed Kongsberg Defence & Aerospace's activities in the Indo Pacific region as well as in Australia.
=====================
For new videos every week, subscribe here! www.youtube.com...
Follow us on Twitter: / navalnewscom
Follow us on LinkedIn: / navalnews
Like us on Facebook: navalnewscom
Check out our daily naval defense news coverage at: www.navalnews....
NAVAL NEWS is fully focused on naval topics. We cover the latest naval defense shows & events. We also report on naval technology from all over the world. Navalnews.com is updated daily with in-depth features, industry, and naval forces news round-ups, event coverage, video reports and more. Our top of the line site is responsive across all mobile and desktop devices.
Nice report Xavier, well done on highlighting the connections and commonality between NSM and how it can be used with the FDC of the NASAMS II systems we are bringing online and the potential for the Kongsberg CDS.
Now all we need to do is confirm JSM for the internal carry weapon of choice for the F-35's 👍
and add the NSM air launched / JSM to the s60 romeos and P8
@@c5173 if there is a call for it, integration and platform certification would be easy enough, but unlikely Australia would go the integration cost alone. That puts the ball firmly into the USA's hands
@@aussienscale the NSM is already being integrated on the s60 for a customer
@@c5173 I know it was slated for the Indian MH-60R, but have not seen any updates for some time, is the integration still going ahead that you have seen any updates on ?
nsm fitted on bushmasters are a wonderful idea you could drive them on containers ships land them on islands giving large range of defense. We could build them in Australia easily under license for Kongsberg defense.
The dutch navy is also switching to kongsberg to replace the aging Harpoon system ,As they are going to build new frigates and update their larger frigates . It makes a lot of sense of having a European build system.
No, the tender is still ongoing.
Saab RBS15 Gungnir
MBDA EXOCET MM40 BLOCK 39
Lockheed Martin AGM-158C LRASM
Rafael SEA BREAKER
IAI sea serpent
Are also competing for the Dutch contract.
My preference list is
1. LRASM
2. Sea Serpent
3. RBS15 Gungnir
4. SEA BREAKER
5. NSM
6. EXOCET
@@kevinvandal8595 The disision is already made . a tender kan run as long as you like but the preference was already the Kongsberg and when a preference is known it will be what they buy . the same with the JSF , they wanted that plane , the grippen , rafael, f14 supertomcat. all where in tender none chosen.
The same for the submarines they alreay decided for the Damen -Saab submarine. and not to go with the french or german submariens or cooperation.
Tenders are more a polite we will consider you but our mind is already made up .
@@marcusfranconium3392
If that was true the government would have selected the Saab-Damen submarine a year ago during the selection fase and moved on. There is a high chance that the TKMS 212CD E will be selected because of the low risk and integration with the german armed forces in the future.
For the harpoon replacment. Yes the NSM is the favorite at the moment, but the NSM is limited in capabilities. There is a growing voice for sea serpent/gabriel V missile
@@kevinvandal8595 They are working on a torpedo launched NSM as well,something the others cant offer
And NSM have same capabilities as the others,if not more
@@mastermariner490
Thats the JSM. But the MSN got the lowest range of capabilities in effective ranges, warhead size and sensor capabilities.
Great purchase I just think the LRASM missile made more sense for us 🇦🇺. Nonetheless am happy with NSM, the harpoon was last decade.
Agreed on LRASM for most applications: truck launched and air launched absolutely. Only advantage I see to NSM is that maybe someone decided that LRASM was too heavy to put on the Arafuras, and there's some not yet public plan to get these things into the RAN and then eventually put box launchers on the OPVs.
That plus the ANZACs are already damn close to their designed weight limit. Swapping the harpoon for LRASM like for like (i.e. eight for eight missiles) would add over ten tonnes to the ship, while NSM will lower the weight a little bit. It's not huge, but it matters.
@@MattWeberWA most ships can handle 200 tonnes over its weight limit without slowing them down. It's just not recommended for long term basis. But some countries still do it and didn't make any difference
@@Nathan-ry3yu Fair, but with things like SEA 5014 towed array sonar coming, there are clearly plans to keep adding capability (and weight) to the ANZACs. Don't get me wrong, I don't think weight was a decisive factor, but I do think it was a tick in the NSM's column rather than the LRASMs.
LRASM purchase has been applied for by Australia for the superhornets. U.S. have also selected the naval strike missile for use. LRASM hasnt finished development for a surface launched version obviously. Both will be used probably.
That's one hell of a enviable missile🚀 by Kongsberg as does the Xavier's hairstyle 👦. Former is nimble and latter is suave.
Xavier Q. Was there any mention of NSM sales to NZ for their ANZAC class frigates? It interesting to see if all 5 eyes get NSM for their warships seen Australia will be future supply hub.
Thanks ScoMo for what he's done for the country during the past 3 years.
If the missiles will be made in Norway. The delivery date will be Q3 2023 at the latest. If the missiles will be made in Australia. The delivery date will be somewhere in 2051.
Yep, the Aussies have a unique talent for stuffing up even the simplest procurement.
it'd be unsurprising Australia mainly chose NSM for interoperability & commonality w/ the US which makes sense. but not minding that factor, Seabreaker would be better, similar abilities but 300+ km range
JSM will be better for Australias F35 and there is also a submarine launched NSM on the way
awe man now I have to reschearch the NSM hope it's as good as the LARSM
Its basically the same and alot of what NSM use is used in LRASM
Australia seems to be taking it's time on changing it's dated equipment.
Building the missiles domestically makes a lot more sense than relying on deliveries from the other side of the world. Long supply lines quickly become a liability in a hot war.
Can you make video on Indian warships.
"Once the rockets are up, who cares where they come down?
That's not my department!" says Wernher von Braun
Good if that kongberg smart misile is pink colour on rimpac 🥰🥰🥰👍
why do they always display the missile upside down?
"Hi everyone..."? Even if he's speaking to a live audience, it is gauche for a compere to say 'hi everyone'. That immediately de-personalizes them. More so on solo media such as radio or video. Almost all viewers are solo. So get some media training and say 'Hello, and welcome to...' etc. Check the video "TV Presenter Training, Top Tips and Hacks" at 99 seconds.
Algorithm.
8⁹p
The USA should have never bought into the NSM system. Boeing was going to build a Harpoon ER, which met all of the US Military's requirements and cost less. Boeing was even going to sell upgrades to the existing harpoons for 25% of what the NSM cost new.
After LRASM goes to full production, it will be a cost competitor with NSM and LRASM has a 1,000 pound warhead, which is about 4 times the size of NSM at 270 pounds.
It is also likely that the LRASM will get an ER model in the future, which could have similar capabilities and range as the JASSM ER, and would be double the NSM's range.
Amazing how corrupt the system is and how much the USA has become reliant on other countries' equipment. No doubt the USA will find itself in a war these "allies" disapprove of and we will be cut off from their overpriced junk.
How is the system corrupt? If anything it's US companies like Boeing that's corrupt. Making shoddy and overprices equipment. Boeing Starliner is a flop, Boeing 737 MAX was a massive mess that killed civilians. Not sure if I trust their military division much.
@@rowaystarco Boeing's Starliner is going to launch a crew later this year to the ISS. ... what a failure!
Interestingly, the Boeing 737 Max only had two problems, and those were in bongo bongo land, where pilots are not trained very well. The FAA forced Boeing to change its software a little bit and forced airlines to train their crews better.
BTW, I don't even like Boeing, because every time I applied to work there... I was not diverse enough for them.
The US Government picks these foreign companies due to wanting to prop-up their defense industries. Funny, Euros do not do the same and the Euros always steal US technology too.
@@willw8011 Boeing Starliner is years behind schedule and is way more expensive to launch than SpaceX with their Falcon 9 and Dragon. I would claim the higher cost of ULA (Boeing owned in part and Boeing is a failure alone.) Also good job in exposing yourself as a racist. The fact is that Boeing cut corners, and innocents paid with their lives.
That argument is pure BS. Norway the maker of NSM/JSM has bought the very expensive F35 planes from America. Finland and Denmark going for F35 too.
@@rowaystarco LMAO telling the truth is wacist, now.
Boeing's Harpoon ER was the better missile: longer range, bigger warhead, existing hardware on US Navy ships, and existing Harpoons could be upgraded for 1/4 the price of the NSM. The USA also built LRASM, which is much better than NSM. The USA could have built a smaller LRASM, which would be the same size as NSM, if it wanted to. Those are also facts.
Almost everything is years behind schedule, so what. Tell me about the crewed spacecraft the EU or bong bong land ever made?
The USA should have never sold the F-35 to any other country, but those countries were begging to buy the F-22 or some other stealth aircraft. As it turns out, 3 countries in the F-35 program stole the tech: British, Japan, South Korea. The British shared the ill-gotten tech with the other Euros, so now the Germans and French have it too and will build "their own" 5th gen sheath fighter. Funny, countries that never built stealth aircraft are just going to jump in and build a 5th gen stealth fighter... and all of those look like the F-22/ F-35.
NATO and our so called alliance with Europe provides zero benefit to the USA. Europeans only seek Eurocentric trade, defense and technology "sharing" agreements. Leeches and thieves are not friends.
@@willw8011 Btw. Your precious Boeing is using European tech in their weapons too, like the next gen 155mm artillery shells like Ramjet 155. American space tech was based on the work done by engineers in Nazi Germany and even designed by those very engineers and rocket scientists. SpaceX was founded and driven forward by a South African/Canadian immigrant.