2 things: 1. Dennis and David talked in their video about playing the inside numbers 1 level above minimum due to the lower payouts compared to the 4/10 2. I think if playing this I’d bet the point and sister #. That way you’re still playing with the rest of the pass line betters, and your numbers change instead of just betting the same every time to help keep things interesting/change things up
I honestly thought about this before i saw the cq video. I was thinking about $25 5; once that hits, i would get a $36 6. If either one hits, i would get a $40 4. Press and collect those three numbers. Less opportunity but also less risk
This is definitely a good strategy for the low roller, but you have to have a LOT of patience!!! I prefer to have a MAX of 4 numbers - the point number and that number's running-mate - and the next number that hits that is OTHER than the point number and its running-mate, and just play that OTHER number that is rolled and its running-mate for a total of 4 place bet numbers, and just go for collecting FIRST the PRESSING for every 2nd hit of a number.
My variation on this strategy is to play 5 and 9, first hit go up on the 6 and move the 9 to the 8 and go from there. Its a grind, but it limits the initial exposure on a smaller bankroll
Thanks for the demo Jeremy. However to me this yet another good example of where the underfunded player is trying to defy probability. If the average roll length per shooter is roughly 8 rolls before the seven, this strategy will only work when a shooter rolls a longer roll than probability says he’s likely to roll. By the way I believe your average roll was 7.5. ➡️ Which is pretty close to the average expectation.
I really like strategy. Im not sure why, but it really seems “random rollers” hit more 4 and 10s. Id love to see what the computer analysis is with those same rolls but you had bet 4 and 10? Might of been a winner ?
My other thought is that if it takes you like 8 or 9 throws to hit the “5” twice then remove your bets. Lay $15 on the 4 or ten and wait for a 7. After that take the money from the 5 hit and play the a ross part.
David and Dennis both opt'd for the 4/10 while you went for the 5/9 Such a minor detail but it's funny how this strat shows how aggressive a gambler someone is
Try this strategy I use I play 15$ table put 15$ on the pass line and 5 on Craps once you make money on the pass press it and if you hit craps bet the pass line again and with the remaining chips play 6-8 till they hit and press them till you double your money also have 5$ on each of the hard number once you establish a number
I'm not sold on this. There is way too much of a rush to get across bets set up with little to no recovery, especially since it will almost certainly take more than two rolls to get to that point. That's the main issue I have with many of the Casino Quest strategies. They are too aggressive for most players because they almost always want to get to playing across as quickly as possible instead of focusing on recouping your initial outlay as quickly as possible and then considering your options from there.
Two hits on one number is asking a lot, the strategy would be more successful if you start with the second level and go across after one hit. You got one hit on most of your throws. For example start with $35 on both the 5 & 9 and then go across after the first hit.
I said it on casino quest Ill say it here if u don't have enough money to go across for the min table limit u shouldn't be playing. This game can make u a decent amount of money with a good strategy and decent throwing techniques like dice control. But being under bankroll ur bond to fail every time plus this strategy is just bad in general don't play this way people there better strategy that only take 2 or 3 hits to get out of the hand
If you can’t go across all the numbers you shouldn’t play a game for entertainment? I understand your premise, it’s a hard game to win when you are under funded, but to tell someone they shouldn’t play and have fun. The point of this video is to give an option for those who may not be able to afford as much as you, but would like to play. This gives them a shot.
@@ColorUp no im not u have to go across u shouldn't play I'm saying if u can't afford to go across like $64 across if u can't afford 64 dollars u shouldn't play cuz ur just gonna throw away that money and u clearly need that money for life
I don't know if you watch Waylon's Way but he has several strategy where he only plays one number and uses his ladder system. You can kill it with just one number. It all comes down to shooting the dice some people are better at it than others.
@HedgeapleJoe ya but its a laddering system so it works different compared to this were u hit 2/3 times on this strategy plus with the ladder systems u usely only need 1 hit
Not bad. After the second hit on the pressed number, I’d do inside. Now my investment back, playing with house money and half the combos.
2 things:
1. Dennis and David talked in their video about playing the inside numbers 1 level above minimum due to the lower payouts compared to the 4/10
2. I think if playing this I’d bet the point and sister #. That way you’re still playing with the rest of the pass line betters, and your numbers change instead of just betting the same every time to help keep things interesting/change things up
I like idea of point and sister numbers to keep things changing.
I honestly thought about this before i saw the cq video. I was thinking about $25 5; once that hits, i would get a $36 6. If either one hits, i would get a $40 4. Press and collect those three numbers. Less opportunity but also less risk
Seems like a good low bankroll strategy. I would bank the $96 across money and play the $96 across only when in profit.
This is definitely a good strategy for the low roller, but you have to have a LOT of patience!!!
I prefer to have a MAX of 4 numbers - the point number and that number's running-mate - and the next number that hits that is OTHER than the point number and its running-mate, and just play that OTHER number that is rolled and its running-mate for a total of 4 place bet numbers, and just go for collecting FIRST the PRESSING for every 2nd hit of a number.
My variation on this strategy is to play 5 and 9, first hit go up on the 6 and move the 9 to the 8 and go from there. Its a grind, but it limits the initial exposure on a smaller bankroll
First time seeing your Subs are at 110K ! Congratulations Jeremy.
Crazy huh🤯
@ColorUp You're doing it right, and it shows up in Subs. Glad I joined over 3 years now.
Fun strategy for those with limited exposure
Thanks for the demo Jeremy. However to me this yet another good example of where the underfunded player is trying to defy probability. If the average roll length per shooter is roughly 8 rolls before the seven, this strategy will only work when a shooter rolls a longer roll than probability says he’s likely to roll. By the way I believe your average roll was 7.5. ➡️ Which is pretty close to the average expectation.
I really like strategy. Im not sure why, but it really seems “random rollers” hit more 4 and 10s. Id love to see what the computer analysis is with those same rolls but you had bet 4 and 10? Might of been a winner ?
Way more horn numbers too.
My other thought is that if it takes you like 8 or 9 throws to hit the “5” twice then remove your bets. Lay $15 on the 4 or ten and wait for a 7. After that take the money from the 5 hit and play the a ross part.
With the right scaling, wouldn't ALL systems work for any table limit?
David and Dennis both opt'd for the 4/10 while you went for the 5/9
Such a minor detail but it's funny how this strat shows how aggressive a gambler someone is
What a low bet gambler sees: “One 7 and it all goes bye bye…”
Try this strategy I use I play 15$ table put 15$ on the pass line and 5 on Craps once you make money on the pass press it and if you hit craps bet the pass line again and with the remaining chips play 6-8 till they hit and press them till you double your money also have 5$ on each of the hard number once you establish a number
I'm not sold on this. There is way too much of a rush to get across bets set up with little to no recovery, especially since it will almost certainly take more than two rolls to get to that point. That's the main issue I have with many of the Casino Quest strategies. They are too aggressive for most players because they almost always want to get to playing across as quickly as possible instead of focusing on recouping your initial outlay as quickly as possible and then considering your options from there.
David is all about getting on all the numbers to create the opportunity to win
@@JoeWillie-j9j But it 's generally a bad strategy and that is my point.
Take that 2nd hit and call it a day… it’s not house money… it s YOUR winnings.
That’s an option
Two hits on one number is asking a lot, the strategy would be more successful if you start with the second level and go across after one hit. You got one hit on most of your throws. For example start with $35 on both the 5 & 9 and then go across after the first hit.
If you have the money for the higher bets, sure. 👍🏻
Bad strategy. I would have already made $200 with the same roll you played
Regarding your intro you should bet on the number first then roll the dice! (then win)
Ok
I’m primarily a place better. So roll the dice, (establish point) bet a number, then win. Ha, so in that case my intro is correct
I said it on casino quest Ill say it here if u don't have enough money to go across for the min table limit u shouldn't be playing. This game can make u a decent amount of money with a good strategy and decent throwing techniques like dice control. But being under bankroll ur bond to fail every time plus this strategy is just bad in general don't play this way people there better strategy that only take 2 or 3 hits to get out of the hand
If you can’t go across all the numbers you shouldn’t play a game for entertainment? I understand your premise, it’s a hard game to win when you are under funded, but to tell someone they shouldn’t play and have fun. The point of this video is to give an option for those who may not be able to afford as much as you, but would like to play. This gives them a shot.
@@ColorUp no im not u have to go across u shouldn't play I'm saying if u can't afford to go across like $64 across if u can't afford 64 dollars u shouldn't play cuz ur just gonna throw away that money and u clearly need that money for life
@@asmoday8382 bro call the 1-800 number no one cares
I don't know if you watch Waylon's Way but he has several strategy where he only plays one number and uses his ladder system. You can kill it with just one number. It all comes down to shooting the dice some people are better at it than others.
@HedgeapleJoe ya but its a laddering system so it works different compared to this were u hit 2/3 times on this strategy plus with the ladder systems u usely only need 1 hit