The $52 Billion Solution To Save NYC From The Sea
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 4 พ.ค. 2024
- Ten years after Hurricane Sandy wreaked havoc on the New York City area, the Army Corps of Engineers is proposing at $52.6 billion plan to protect the region from coastal storm risk. Plan 3B includes seawalls, surge gates, flood walls, levees and more but still can’t guarantee perfect protection. Watch the video to find out what’s included in the plan, who opposes it and how it will change the NYC coastline forever.
Chapters:
0:00 - Introduction
01:44 - Plan 3B
05:10 - Costs
08:10 - Timeline
10:26 - Climate migration
Produced by: Lindsey Jacobson
Additional Camera: Nathaniel Lee, Andrea Miller, Charlotte Morabito
Additional Editing: Brian Lutz
Graphics: Midnight Snacks
Archival Assistance from Debora Schooley
» Subscribe to CNBC: cnb.cx/SubscribeCNBC
» Subscribe to CNBC TV: cnb.cx/SubscribeCNBCtelevision
About CNBC: From 'Wall Street' to 'Main Street' to award winning original documentaries and Reality TV series, CNBC has you covered. Experience special sneak peeks of your favorite shows, exclusive video and more.
Connect with CNBC News Online
Get the latest news: www.cnbc.com/
Follow CNBC on LinkedIn: cnb.cx/LinkedInCNBC
Follow CNBC News on Facebook: cnb.cx/LikeCNBC
Follow CNBC News on Twitter: cnb.cx/FollowCNBC
Follow CNBC News on Instagram: cnb.cx/InstagramCNBC
#CNBC
The $52 Billion Solution To Save NYC From The Sea
I'm all for this, I even first heard about it a long time ago from a geopolitical analyst. The issue for me is that this $52 billion budget will grow to be $300billion and timeline will extend double it's life.
I mean, the lives of 20 million people are clearly not worth 300 billion
How can a budget that large grow 5 times
Hope so. But you are taking from a storm that's around 0.125 % chance at hitting the city.
Just print money, problem solved :)
In that case consider it an investment, seriously!
LA STRUTTURA DEI MERCATI CONTINUA A SCENDERE, FORSE ENORMI PROFITTI SONO STATI FATTI DAGLI ESPERTI. HO SENTITO CHE LA DETENZIONE NON E ' UNA MOSSA INTELLIGENTE NEL BREVE PERIODO. SI PREGA DI QUALSIASI IDEA SU COME FARE MIGLIORI PROFITTI NEL MERCATO.
Ti consiglio vivamente di non fare trading automatico, è davvero pericoloso e ha portato giù così tanti investitori, hai bisogno di qualcuno con le conoscenze e le strategie, qualcuno dedicato al business del mercato delle criptovalute e raccomanderà vivamente l'esperto Mrs Kiana Danial
Qui in Canada l'esperta signora Kiana Danial svolge sia il potenziale di orientamento che quello di tutoraggio
non si tratta di guardare video.... L'ho fatto per molto tempo senza risultati positivi, poi ho provato un professionista e ho fatto grandi guadagni.
Il suo servizio commerciale è qui in Europa?
Ciò che mi sorprende di lei per lo più è che dà l'accesso del suo cliente al suo sito di trading per cui possono monitorare i loro scambi su base giornaliera
It's not a question if such storms will happen, just when. The damage over the next decades will be much more than 52 billion.
You think this project will cost the stated 52b? lol
You've fallen for the climate change scam pushed by dishonest scientists that live on climate change grants instead of working real jobs.
@@qud3913 it would take 75+ years to build it
how do you know? are you GOD!
Because every flood event will be billions of dollars in damages. It’s that simple.
Climate change is a real threat that the Government have decided to not take any major action on. We often ignore the devastating effect it could have if things were to get out of hand. Imagine the economic turmoil it could have on the economy, and for a place like NYC, the effect would be rippling, and might spread across the whole globe. The stock market will collapse, businesses will go bankrupt, etc. So the Government should take action today.
True. I was speaking to my friend about how this could have effect in the economy, just yesterday. She shared a different view though, but she still agreed that it would affect the economy. Btw, I heard some people have been pulling in thousands in the current market condition despite the downturn. Any secrets?
@@albacus2400BC It's actually quite simple. Just concentrate on two main objectives. First, keep yourself safe by knowing when to sell stocks in order to limit losses and maximise gains. Second, get ready to benefit from market changes. I advise consulting a CFP or other professional for advice.
@@ericmendels Yes, I have been in touch with a CFP ever since the 2020. So it's key to not lose your money. That's very important and is the first rule of investing. I personally use a wealth manager, and I return about $30k per month. Not as much as some people might make in returns, but at least my money is safe.
@@stephenpotter21 I really care more about the safety of my fund. Could you recommend the firm you work with?
@@victorlaranjahal No, I don't use firms as firms. Their large bureaucracies don't enable good returns. I use individual wealth managers who have a proven track record. So you could check out a couple. I personally work with Sharon Louise Count.
Why? Let New Yorkers move up to the third floor. The heating system could then be on the second floor. The tenants now could use row boats to get around. That is good for health and solves the NYC car traffic problem. It also now has an automatic street cleaning system, Each tide cycle will flush the debris out to sea. You can fish out your window for fresh fish for dinner.
lmaooo. thanks for a good laugh bro!
You’ll be fishing rats
But we can't switch to renewable energy because that would cost too much.
It's sadly ironic, isn't it?
As the mining companies start to move away from coal and toward lithium, cobalt, nickel etc. we start to see a dramatic shift in how politicians view renewable energy because all of a sudden it's companies Tesla that are writing the check not Exxon and Chevron.
I love hearing rich people say we are in it together🤣🤣🤣😂😂😂
Thanks a lot CNBC for this awesome journalism and thanks to all the people involved in this project!! Hopefully all people in the NYC area benefit greatly from this project!!
Also: please keep New York City alive and thriving as it has always been, is now and hopefully will stay for many more centuries to come.
The stock market has been a really tough one this past year, but I watched an interview on CNBC where the anchor kept mentioning "katrina vanrensum ". This prompted me to get in touch with her, and from August 2022 till now we have been working together, and I can now boast of $540,000 in my trading portfolio.
That's right, getting in touch with a consultant during the pandemic was how I was able to scale through the crazy stock downtrend.
Like I said earlier , her name is Katrina Vanrensum and you can reach her via her website.
Just run a search on her name, and you would see all you need.
Ain't nobody falling for these bots
@@wza223-fo3mc They really are 😆
Thinking about cities with underground storm water reservoirs (Tokyo and Chicago as examples), I wonder what role or viability those could play in a solution.
Even a beaver knows that attempting to stop water flow creates flooding in the opposing areas!
The issue for me is that this $52 billion budget will grow to be $300billion and timeline will extend double it's life.
just wonder when Path can operate on weekends. it was said they were impacted by typhoon sandy 10 years ago but the construction is still in progress. the mighty slowness and the astonishing high budget really astonishes me...
Well, embezzlement takes money. Politicians can't allow a project this size to go through without siphoning off a huge chunk for themselves.
we need dutch engineers, they have more experience for doing this
I think people need to reassess where they live… you live near a volcano, then you better expect lava. Live near a large body of water, expect a flood. You can’t beat nature
You’re one of the few critical thinkers left. I agree with you, all animals are nomadic except modern humans
Spot on. Climate change has been happening for millions of years before the first dinosaur, and will continue for millions of years after the last human is replaced by another form of life, maybe even more intelligent than the human race. Unfortunately critical thinking seems to have gone the way of the manual transmission, having been replaced by social media telling them how to think and act.
Look at California. Constant droughts and fires. Why? IT'S A DESERT.
This is completely true, nothing can stop the flooding entirely. There are too many variables in this plan and flooding damages will still occur at a high rate.
@@magee1627That isn’t critical thinking. Especially if the idea is completely and utterly not salvageable or based in reality. It may sound good in your mind, or on social media, but human nature will never allow that nonsense to happen until they exhaust all other options, no matter the cost. Can you imagine the politics of emptying out the NEW YORK CITY metropolitan area???? Give me a break.
Let it go under - my hometown has become a shell of what it once was.
I worked down in the Wall Street area when Sandy hit the city. The company didn’t reopen until 3 weeks after the storm. Even after that length of time, the water line from the floods were still visible on the building walls, it was about 10 feet high.
Good. Put those crooks out of business!
@SummerWizz1 You'd be poorer than now without that crooks defending the economic stability.
you know what they say
the writing is on the wall
🤭
@@SummerSausage1 I love those crooks :)
During Sandy my street was under 5 ft of water they evacuated us that day I went home to Rye to my parents where we didn't have electricity but we had hot water in the stove. I applied to FEMA and they put me up at the downtown W for 3 months. Sent me a check for $2,500 with an additional month at Gild Hall.
Funny part is the people that caused this are sitting at the top of a hill.
Climate change is caused by consumers, not by producers.
The people that caused this are dead. Good try, though.
But they also own Beach Houses for Vacations.
And they're probably insured for those.
This project will be delayed and final figure will be $150 Billion.
If not more…..!
Lol that's how it was back then, right now tho we've got a lot more incompetent ppl in power so it's gonna cost 300b and take twice the time u estimated
It’s over leave
I mean we spend like twice that on military so id say even 150billion is worth saving one of the most important cities in history.
@@redfox4561 Let me know who else you want to be the world’s military leader…..China? Russia?
There is more then enough money in the corporate investments and personal income of the richest new yorkers to pay for this program.
What makes you think you're entitled to take that money?
There are no barriers tall enough to protect you from the wrath of mother nature.
So true
Fact
God is going to tear that down too WATCH!
THEY JUST DON'T GET IT! NYC IS GOING UNDER
I like Plan 2, one or more large surge gates, as this is a lot like what the Netherlands did to protect against storms. It is the higher than normal waves that are the issue so if you can stop these waves from getting into the low-lying areas then you're largely fine. I would also look at dredging the NY Harbor area and using that to build up the sea wall where NY bay meets the Atlantic.
Lies again? Masters Of Sea
Great suggestion, what is your Masters and PhD in?
@@SummerSausage1 I currently hold a Masters degree in Engineering, a Bachelors degree in Biomedical Science, I am a Senior Member of the IEEE (SMIEEE), I have 23 years of experience in the workforce, and I have co-authored multiple scientific research papers.
I was thinking dredging may also be some assistance.
This was exactly my thought, it is one project instead of several and I believe has the most longevity instead of having to revisit plans 10 years from now when things develop beyond the original several plans scope which are still being implemented.
Time for NYC to raise taxes…..no reason the entire nation should have to pay.
Similar work is being done to protect Houston - it's just a necessity at this point.
10x the estimate so the politicians can line their pockets
That's crazy, why not to spend that money on planting more trees or on renewables energy sources and the best option is to start cutting down on fuel consumption. China, US and India are really affecting the rest of the world because of their massively green gas emissions
Would it be possible to build breakers with rocks to mitigate surge damage? Also taking lessons from other cities using mangrove, greenspace, corals
It’s a nice thought but mangroves are tropical, they wouldn’t survive the cold. Same with corals.
Netherlands have this
Could probably build a wall out of nyc rats, locally sourced material
Mangroves as natural barriers in that part of the globe? 🙄
For the same $52 billion you can build a couple blocks of the 1st Avenue Subway.
No longer worth it due to climate change
At the current rate the Antarctic Doomsday Ice Sheet is breaking up New York does not have until 2044. The sea level will be rising by about 11.5 feet in the next 2 to 3 years, and double that by 2030. It's a shame no one took the warnings seriously back in the 1970s when there was plenty of time to deal with this. If I lived in NY, I would start looking to relocate soon.
From a new yorker definitely soon
Nigeria did something similar and it worked well. It's pretty feasible as far as there aren't other water bodies getting pushed by the walls
They should be ready to build an underwater city
Reminds me of the scene from A.I where New York in the future was underwater tbh.
That movie was awful
The end of the world is Manhattan.
some sort of energy generation really should be built into this project... be it waves, wind, solar... with such a big project that requires maintenance... making it a powered generating project could make it seem more utopian and less dystopian
An off shore wind farm and oyster farm/ sea wall would make a lot more sense. I hope they actually incorporate stuff like that.
That 52 billion dollars will jump to 200 billion dollars 😂
Very true John.
The it will hurt the poor and minorities the most line was pretty funny. How many poor people do you know who own property near the coast of the NYC area? Most poor people can't afford property in the NYC area at all. This is an issue with these projects when the ones making the decisions are bureaucrats and politicians. It takes them decades to come up with a plan, come in massively over budget and take decades to build.
They have to sell it.
@@TheDogGoesWoof69 you have to sell your soul to even afford a house in today’s age.
Another idiot bot. Are all these Russian or Chinese?
Or they could just do something about climate change. 🤔
Either way they’ll tax you don’t worry
That ship has sailed, crashed, burned and sunk.
add 20 feet to the land. jack up all the structures. chicago did it one time including raising tall buildings.
why does this seem so familiar?
reminds me of some other sunked cities in europe
Question: does the plan include dealing with rainwater runoff from super storm? If not, won't the area behind the storm gates flood?
Guess rain water will flow from the drainages towards the wall where high capacity pumps will pump them over the wall
Manhattan is an island in a river coming out to sea.
There isn't a viable plan to contain that.
Build somewhere else, it'll cost less.
F NYC!
Precisely.
In an ideal world I imagine the best solution woud be massive walls that remain hidden until the 100 years storm and then they rise to protect the city. Probably cost way more than 52 billion though, along with exorbitant maintenance costs.
Sounds like a movie
In my mind when the time comes the wall does not rise because a millennial was to busy lving their best life on TH-cam and did not maintain it.
The lack of urgency is astounding.
Just start building higher. You can't wall off the ocean for more than a decade or two. I don't want to pay taxes for rich people on the coasts to constantly rebuild after disasters.
Imagine if someone spent $52 billion fixing what's causing these mysterious rising seas and extreme storms
52 Billion wouldnt be nearly enough
@greg9761 the implication (to me) is that the sum of all the expensive "adaptations" will be more than what fixing the problem in the first place would have been.
Next week, Musk will claim his mission to Mars is actially a climate change adaptation and secure government funding..
Sounds good but these changes are only possible through systemic policies to incentivize carbon neutral activities
Ya you should start. Go live in a cave.
@@kronosaurelius but people are making money with renewables. So adapting to climate change doesn’t have to be a net loss. It’s actually profitable. Healthier. Everyones happier. And not dead n stuff.
I wish NYC the best
If we would have worried about climate change like we should have , decades ago, we wouldn't need to worry about building a wall now
You COULD spend it on better office furniture. That would be a once-in-a-day upgrade.
You work for 40yrs to have $1m in your retirement, meanwhile some people are putting just $10k in investing coins for just few months and now they are multimillionaires, all thanks to Mrs Julia, God bless you ma 👏
I'm 37 and have been looking for ways to be successful, please how??
😱Sounds familiar, I have heard her name on several occasions.. and both her success stories in the wall Street journal!
Wow wow please is there any way to reach there services, I work 3 jobs and trying to pay off my students loan for a while now!! Please help me
@Randy George Thanks am sending her a message NOW! this is huge opportunity for me
My first 15 figure profit shocked everyone that they started trading with her guidance and expertise on both stocks and crypto....
So - just a years rent in an Manhattan penthouse... seems reasonable...
1:21 I'm all for the wall around NY itself not just the wall in our southern border, know what I'm saying? 🤣
How the people who own homes on billionaires row make an investment to protect their assets and fund this project?
I thought "build bridges not walls".
I'd argue that the insurance companies should get involved in the funding of this. At least partially. They're the ones who will eventually save big money from this.
They barely want to pay what they should be paying how would this ever happen?
@@sobeliever1638 They would save more money. They like paying less. It's in their corporate DNA.
Whats about Yellowstone?
This is a problem that solves itself without a sea barrier. If property insurers charge market rates that reflect the risk, and the federal government took a position of not bailing out landowners, then people would move, causing property values to decline to the point that building a wall wouldn't be anywhere near economically feasible. Problem solved, you're welcome.
Finally. I’ve been looking for an intelligent comment that understands reality. Why should everyone else have to pay to fix these people’s real problem which is there need to live as close to ocean as possible without ever seeing water in their house. There is literally a whole continent they could move to. If they really want to stay there, I’m all for it, but they should pay. They haven’t been getting out their pocketbooks for people living in West Virginia who are partially poor because of their bad geography.
@@Triquetra15 the trend seems to be going to no state tax and bigger federal govt.
Reminds me how pre 1950 living close to the ocean wasn’t considered desirable in the way it is today. People who did live on the coast often didn’t even have windows facing the water. The ocean was a source of heavy winds and the technology didn’t exist yet to proof your home from the force of these.
How about instead of using technology to force making a previously inhospitable environment somehow livable, we just accept that Mother Nature can’t be completely dominated and we instead should adapt in other ways.
The fact that this nonsense got likes is an indication of the lack of education and common sense in today’s world. Do you not understand global economies, POLITICS, and the societal impact of doing what you say? Do you not understand the massive interruption this would have on the country and the far greater cost? My goodness, how can people be so narrow minded and completely unable to think past the trees. Stop watching nonsense that just reinforces your ignorance and actually try to get educated. But we all know you won’t..
@@Triquetra15Zero brain activity here
Probably be cheaper to alter the weather so more water freezes over cold regions, in particular, the South Pole. That would draw down sea levels over time. Wall might help for a 1-2 foot rise, but anything more, likely not. Water will find a way to get around the wall including coming up through the soil. Better approach is moving much of the city and/or raising the buildings.
I ams sure you discuss that with Storm and Professor Xavier already.
Brilliant take, hope we hear from them soon.
Or we could try and stop climate change by going to renewable energy, wasting less, and planting trees?
@@distracting1 Obama and Gore have beachfront mansions... I wouldn't worry too much about climate change.
@@atomicwedgie8176 "same I also think we shouldn't care about when the glaciers melt all of florida will be under the sea!"
@@distracting1 Take a glass and fill it with ice, set it on a table, and be amazed that it won't run over, when it melts. Climate change is a money and control grab against us. Statistics show the world is ACTUALLY cooling... it goes through heating and warming cycles. These politicians and scientists pushing this nonsense are demons.
Why did the study take 10 years! Sandy was in 2012, started in 2013 and construction expected complete by 2040's when sea level will already be higher...
There has to be an engineer able solution to divert flood waters into lower waterways and do it without some giant expensive sea wall. Imagine if we took all that extra water and captured it for our reservoirs somehow. I'm not going attempt to guess if or how we could do that but I can only hope they're thinking about it in a practical way.
NYC's reservoirs are all located north of the city and are mostly full. Capturing surge water would have to be desalinated and would take a tremendous amount of energy to then transport upstream, so while its a nice idea that isnt something that is really necessary and/or feasible.
@@bkguy11203 I'm not saying that's the right solution but there's many ways water moves across continents. We just have to think about how to get to do that same thing when we want, where we want. If we can't solve problems like this in the 21st century we're doomed.
Sea walls might be working in the short term, but they become less viable in the long term under projected climate change and sea level rise scenarios. I am afraid that major cities like New York will eventually have to strategically relocate their critical social and financial infrastructure to inland areas.
Places like New York can’t exist long term. A sea wall would eventually fail and they don’t have the ability to stop a flood like that, it would be a catastrophe
You kids are completely brainwashed.... sigh....
Ask Dutch, they have 1/3rd country below sea level
Could just stop building in risky areas and move development to Hartford CT. But something tells me that won’t happen since people are moving to Miami which is already under water
Won't be "inland" for long. Plan correctly, and it'll be water front again.
okay playing devils advicate here: lets say this approved and built and works, what is to prevent any other site on coastline demanding their own $52 billion project?
If only Long Island is connected whole to connecticut , a sea walls(like attack on titan tall walls) to the south will just suffice and they can make a natural huge water reservoir and can make a hydroelectric dam too.
New York is priceless. The city must survive at all costs.
it's garbage. i hope we pollute more and let new york sink along with LA and SF
I agree!
An excellent story that clearly communicates the complex climate challenges faced by all New Yorkers . Lindsey reports not only on the problems but also on some potential solutions as well
This reminds me of the Expanse Series New York Wall
What Sealevel rise did they use for the design?
14 years - likely triple that.
during that time, the revised Sealevel rise will blow this design 'out of the water'
better move to 70 meters higher ground.
Been waiting for this to actually happen for years. I mean, sci-fi had this figured out way back in 1981!
Yeah, wall to keep NYC in, not the sea out!
which movie?
It was ONE storm, 11 years ago. The world is NOT ending.
@@TheBooban Will it keep their Politics IN though???
Might as well build trillions of dollars of walls on all coast. The U.S. should have began populating the Mid West a long time ago. the North American water Shed is huge and extending from the Arctic Ocean to the Gulf of Mexico and by connecting it north to south and east to west should be a priority.
Smarter to just extend the coast. Problem is cities too near to the water. Can’t move the city now, so just reclaim land and rebuild the coast with natural barriers and give people their natural coast again. Must be cheaper and better solution.
Have you ever been to the Midwest USA? 'Nuff said, its worse than Ukraine, especially the meth!
Is the wall to keep water out or the ppl in 🤔
This will end up like the levy-system around New Orleans; whatever ends up being constructed... it won't be maintained, just like all the other dated, mouldering infrastructure here.
There is no world in which climate migration wouldn't just benefit the hugely wealthy. All of the rich people pushed out of lower Manhattan will just be moved to the Bronx and the non coastal parts of Brooklyn and queens which are some of the last ungentrified areas of the city. They'll make those places their new homes and push the people who live there onto the streets. Climate migration cannot be an option
Perhaps the city can gradually be raised up. Start with the streets block by block. The building owners can do changes in their entrances or whatever it takes. There is a precedent for this: when the NY Central RR ran tracks to Grand Central Station, it was decided to raise the street level to above the track level. The necessary accommodations were made. Park Avenue runs OVER the NY Central tracks.
…. Huh?
"We should take bikini bottom and push it somewhere else!"
futurama's NEW New York comes to mind
Build Pipe Lines To Desserted Places Like Arizona, Nevada, Utah And Arizona To Lower The Water 🌊
Our new estimate is now 500 Billion and 30 years to build.
At $52 Billion. Correct me if I'm wrong, but wouldn't it be cheaper to build a new city that can A. Handle a growing population and B. Not be in the direct path of hurricanes based on accessible data?
It’s probably much more environmentally damaging to build a whole new city. The increase in co2 material transportation and manufacturing would exacerbate the problem and wherever that new city is placed we’ll see increased problems as well. If you move it inland and it gets too hot you get droughts and wildfires. Move it north and the weather is erratic you get blizzards with 10 feet of snow. The reality is we have to modify the city and change the way we live and interact with nature to secure the future.
The damage from Sandy was $19 Billion for NYC and $37 Billon in NJ and that is with buildings and infrastructure being repaired. You're not moving a fraction of NYC for $52 Billion. One WTC alone cost $3.8 billion to build and it's not uncommon that individual office buildings in Manhattan run into the billions of dollars to construct. The real estate in all of NYC alone is worth literally trillions of dollars and if you take into account the infrastructure you're looking at trillions more. Start building all new building and infrastructure and you're probably in range of tens of trillions of dollar just to move NYC.
Escape from New York! 😂
5% of the countries economy and becoming less everyday.
How many boarded up window downtown still?
All those companies who said they'll never be back!
How's that Louisiana thing going now?
You know New Orleans?
Who's paying for it?
So we have no problem spending billions of taxpayers money to protect private profits of major shareholders of oil companies. We are not changing our energy generation structure because it will hurt their earnings (politicians like to call it "economy"). We are just mitigating the damage because we are being told it's inevitable.
In other words, many will pay for the greed of the few.
Very interesting
Too costly. I bet the Dutch can offer a much cheaper solution
Guaranteed. They did an even bigger project for 1/10th the costs. The Delta works they built to defend the Southwest of the country protects an area bigger than New York, and was designed and built for a mere €5 billion. Even better, it still allows the port of Rotterdam, the 3rd biggest in the world, to work without any hindrance to its shipping whatsoever yet can fully close everything off in less than an hour if needed.
@@pieterveenders9793 Too optimistic. Those 5B€ was spend between 1960 and 1997. Taking inflation into account, my wild guess is that it costed around 30B€ in todays money. But better to look at current investments. The Dutch spent 7.7B€ per year (2020) on water management projects, which is just short of 1% of the GDP. 1% of 21Trillion US$ (GDP) is 210B US$ per year. 50B spread over many years to protect NY is not much. Relatively.
Investing is considered a bedrock in making generational wealth. Most people don't know when, where or what to invest in. Fortunately, great investors of the past and present can provide us with guidance and ideas. Meaningful contributions are always welcomed.
The common mistake we newbies make is without help and legit guidance from a professional.
@@alonsocarlos8372 Job will pay your bills, business will make you rich but investments make and keep you wealthy, the future is inevitable.
The market is all about crypto now, you might want to look into it.
Investing in Stocks is the wisest decision, If you've not been involved in any you're missing out.
Nobody becomes a millionaire or billionaire by working for others and depending on them, good investment brings millions of dollars.
What about Florida cities and every other city along the oceans? Let New York City pay for it itself.
the making of Escape from New York
build a wall
make Manhattan Island a prison
If anything, 8 million New Yorkers will get free scuba gear!
I wonder how they plan to pay for all this, and it's not just NY!
Flushing NY from time to time may not be all bad.
NYC's GDP in 2022 was $2.1 Trillion. $52.6 Billion is definitely affordable.
It ⏲️ to leave the BIG CITY OF DREAMS
And if they use traditional concrete and steel, they will only add to the base problem.
It will cost much more than that, and it'll be a waste of money and ressources. No plans for facing climate change or even for facing economic recession/retraction. That's insane. Not to mention we don't know how much sea levels are going to rise since we don't know if global temperatures are going to be 2, 3 or 4 degrees higher than pre-industrial times. Precisely because of the uncertainty, it wouldn't hurt to already prepare for the worse, which means already planning relocations of some of the most low-lying areas of NYC's region.
The wall around New York is in the opening sequence of The Expanse.
New Yorker can surely afford this because New York has a "billionaire row" 🙂
You pay for it
So it will be more like 75 billion.
I don’t think block nyc waterfront go with plan 2
The $0 solution: Don't, fk cities. We don't need cities when we can work remote.
focus on building the wall with Mexico first
How about work on the the water systems.
It floods in Hoboken from just a half inch of rain.
More drains, and make the pipes bigger. It will not flood.
Glad luck nyc with this plan
We don't need luck we are rich
Invest a few million in PICKING UP THE DAMN TRASH. Im visiting NYC right now and it’s ridiculous
Why not drop large boulders into the sea to create an underwater wall that reduces wave size? Similar to how some Caribbean beaches have a "shore" hundreds of feet out. It's better than a visible wall and wouldn't require construction or years to build. The boulders would absorb the wave impact, protecting the land.
Just redirect the next hurricane to billionaires row and wall street. problem solved
So...Walls work now? Didn't work in 2016 but now they magically do? Fascinating.
Water isn’t very smart, humans are. I guess , I might be wrong since you are also a human.
I'm sure the waves/storm surges will get a ladder to help them climb over
Water doesn't work like an autonomous human being, numbnut
@@JHayler7 walls won't stop tidal waves, but they can sure help slow the movement. See how that works?
@@anony88 he was being sarcastic in response to the parent comment
Why not reclaim a big part of the land as part of a sea wall. You can create a new seafront, and more buildings in high value area which would also generate money, it’s just like Flevoland in the Netherlands, any of the proposed plans are heavily inspired by the Netherlands.
The wave trailer 🌊🤷
Or we could have oil & gas corporations foot his bill. Apparently they wrote studies in the 70's that predicted this if we maintained or increased using their products.
Man in a suit says we’re all in this together, check your wallets people lmao
based lol