China's Submarine Torpedo Destroys Out-Of-Use Ship As Navy Claims "Historic Breakthrough"

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 27 ก.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 505

  • @TheUltimateOpportunist
    @TheUltimateOpportunist 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +106

    A "historic breakthrough" that other countries have been doing for decades

    • @saiyanhead
      @saiyanhead 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      shut up and clap

    • @garryh3126
      @garryh3126 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

      You have absolutely no idea what is coming

    • @AmericanVice
      @AmericanVice 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

      @@garryh3126lol. Enlighten us Garry, what’s coming?

    • @vm-my6hg
      @vm-my6hg 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      A stealth submarine that can also fly at mach 25 is coming soon 😋

    • @garryh3126
      @garryh3126 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@AmericanVice
      Jeremiah 51 with Iran
      Revelation 18 Mystery Babylon USA destruction without warning.
      Russian and Chinese invasion of America...
      Vision of Pastor Henry Gruver
      Prophecy and vision of Pastor David Wilkerson
      Vision of the Romanian pastor Dimitri Dudaman.
      Prophecy of Caroline Daidem prophetic vision
      The prophecy and vision of the masters voice prophecy channel Celestial....
      AA Allen prophecy
      Mike 444 prophecy news channel..
      Holy spirit wind site prophecy channel .
      Prophets of God / bible...
      Daniel ... Jeremiah.. Ezekiel..The revelation of John the Revelator...all this is the without warning a surprise attack from your coastlines East and West coast without warning...a knock out decapitation strikes all across America Mystery Babylon USA Revelation 18 for in one hour no more .
      You are now IN LIGHTENED 🙏 and finally A Russian and Chinese invasion on your soil...God bless 🙏....

  • @smokescreen2146
    @smokescreen2146 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +22

    torpedo is ww2 tech

    • @et2709
      @et2709 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Why do you need high tech to destroy some wrecked ship?!

    • @denniszhang3021
      @denniszhang3021 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Yes you are absolutely right of your own Lies that submarines during WW1 is run by electric submarines, and only China has the only Electric Submarines that cross below the ocean with silent mode that US submarine unable to detect China's submarine frome its Sonar. and Chinese electric Submarines can easily hit the US submarines because of its noisy Old submarines.😛.!

    • @efrendeaustria7325
      @efrendeaustria7325 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Nuclear torpedo is much much different from the ww2 torpedoes...

    • @georgewilson4245
      @georgewilson4245 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Please don;t tell the Chinese Red Army that. Thanks.

  • @ufopulse
    @ufopulse 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +31

    2024: "We now have torpedos" lol

    • @wionporky9937
      @wionporky9937 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Stop that.
      CRUX you are frightening all the Indians 😮😮😮

    • @kygocrysmaine3583
      @kygocrysmaine3583 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      This torpedo can climb upward it says. Maybe to target hovercrafts and hydrofoil ships. I don't know maybe it can't

    • @94Whiskey
      @94Whiskey 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@wionporky9937 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

    • @georgewilson4245
      @georgewilson4245 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@kygocrysmaine3583 They are claiming this torpedo can travel 1000km. WOW!

    • @kygocrysmaine3583
      @kygocrysmaine3583 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@georgewilson4245 and drill underground or homing jets

  • @indrahaseo
    @indrahaseo 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +36

    paper tiger lol 😂

    • @H1mynameisLarry
      @H1mynameisLarry 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Proud American here but typical American thought process - I think the USA is a paper tiger. We are afraid to directly step in to fight Russia. We only have the guts to fight third-world countries. We spent 20 years fighting third-world countries that didn't even have a Navy, tank, Air Force, or anything else. That speaks volumes. The truth is, not a single American soldier today has any experience fighting another Navy, Airforce, drones, or even a country with nukes. Quit bragging and living off successful wars from the 1940s. We have zero modern war experiences. We fought a country that only had 1991 Toyota Tacomas.

  • @monacruz2762
    @monacruz2762 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Bruce lee once said wooden board doesn't hit back..fighting a resisting opponent is far different from training or drill

  • @Eire32
    @Eire32 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +46

    They are 100 years to late the West has been sinking ships since WW1 😂

    • @garryh3126
      @garryh3126 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Your another one who's in for a piss and shit time 😅...your own .

    • @izajahmed8863
      @izajahmed8863 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      lol in hollywood nly... all talk no action

    • @garryh3126
      @garryh3126 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      And the West hasn't won a war in 70 years and been in 50 plus incursions to date around the world and every one they have been in the country is worse off
      As when it first started

    • @ryanspinoza6586
      @ryanspinoza6586 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      @@izajahmed8863 Brother, torpedos from submarines have been around since WW2, it's a real thing that isn't just from movies you watched LOL.

    • @poonhound9377
      @poonhound9377 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      It’s not torpedos in general, but rather the type of torpedo.

  • @halo7250
    @halo7250 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +36

    Be cautious when suggesting that China lacks war experience. Not long ago, 3.2 million UN soldiers faced off against 2.9 million Chinese reinforcements in the Korean War. China's peasant army almost single-handedly pushed back a coalition of forces from 21 COUNTRIES to the DMZ. Consider the entire history of humanity and name another instance where so many nations stood against a single country. Let's not push China into an existential situation that forces them to mobilize the entire nation for total war, as it would truly be hell on earth. War experience is irrelevant as it can be gain over time, as long as the country have strategic depth, manpower, industrial capacity, technology, and determination they will catch up in no time.. Just look at Russia..

    • @hokz7283
      @hokz7283 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      You have described exactly how the US was in the second world war

    • @Capeau
      @Capeau 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Because they didnt want to shoot peasants...

    • @baffometti
      @baffometti 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      covid lover

    • @suilfisean
      @suilfisean 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You're clearly Chinese, I don't think you really want to be using russia as an example of anything enviable when it comes to warfare 😄

    • @halo7250
      @halo7250 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      @@hokz7283In World War 2, the USA and UK exhibited their core strength through their massive industrial base. Fast forward to today, the crucial question is how many warships or warplanes they can realistically produce if a global war breaks out. It's vital to remember that the key to winning a war is not having the best weapons, but the ability to produce and deploy “usable” weapons in vast quantities compared to the adversary. China current industrial capacity will allow them to flood the modern battlefield with AI controlled air, land, and sea drones. Adversary will lose a large bulk of their forces to those drone weapons, even before they meet the main force.. This is the cruel reality of modern warfare.

  • @imhimdk1785
    @imhimdk1785 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

    The most modern when American already has these??

    • @Jaysqualityparts
      @Jaysqualityparts 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The whole world has them.

    • @一路风景-v9g
      @一路风景-v9g 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      你是美国人吗?

  • @betchiebedonio
    @betchiebedonio 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +30

    Made in china not durable😂

    • @garryh3126
      @garryh3126 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Are you in for a shock soon it's your piss and shit time 😅

    • @liuminggee2573
      @liuminggee2573 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

      My huawei smartphone already 6 years old .still run like new one.

    • @momofighter3211
      @momofighter3211 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@liuminggee2573 Wah Way sucks. Chinese will always be low quality.

    • @张先生-f3m
      @张先生-f3m 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      美军并不这么想😂

    • @louiswilliamterminator2887
      @louiswilliamterminator2887 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@liuminggee2573 because they have lost access to modern chips?

  • @imhimdk1785
    @imhimdk1785 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    Wanna be American Soo bad

    • @Nikita4557
      @Nikita4557 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Nobody wants to be American.

    • @CuckimusMaximus
      @CuckimusMaximus 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      American men don’t know if they want to be men or women china not worried 😂

    • @eddale5557
      @eddale5557 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @Wukong_TheMonkeyKing Is the same in Norway so US is not any worse.

    • @imhimdk1785
      @imhimdk1785 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @Wukong_TheMonkeyKing crazy how so many ppl are immigrating to America still and I’ll rather be in America then anywhere else

    • @imhimdk1785
      @imhimdk1785 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @Wukong_TheMonkeyKing sure bro congrats? I hope you know there’s nothing wrong with that and America and Canada don’t care. Now use your logic about the ones in china or anywhere else in the world who saying that about moving to America. The cost of living has gone up but ig you have must been spoiled because making 80k-100k is not bad at all and a lot of ppl would love living with that income. I think it’s more about you losing touch with reality and being ungrateful. You don’t seem as bad as other ppl but bro don’t let geopolitics get in your life decisions. Yk every state in America and there cost of living varies right? And why china of all the places in the country but again it’s your choice and d what’s best for you god bless you and your family and decision

  • @du1gor
    @du1gor 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    the LAST CIVILIZATION ...the MARK OF THE BEAST

    • @notwithstanding111
      @notwithstanding111 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I think so I think they need to read the bible .
      Because their judgement day is about to come soon .

    • @mariablog2321
      @mariablog2321 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      And They are the Beast,China PIRATES

  • @ZOFIELHERRERA-wy3yo
    @ZOFIELHERRERA-wy3yo 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    A strong message to the United States: Do not mess around!

    • @kevinclarkson7036
      @kevinclarkson7036 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They probably won't mess with China, they will be laughing too much!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • @nicoleela2617
    @nicoleela2617 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    China Imperial Pirates 😂😂😂

  • @GilbertFortes
    @GilbertFortes 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    😂😂😂😂the gap between US and china are hundred years of experience

  • @mikestewart4752
    @mikestewart4752 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    🤦 That ship was likely rigged with an explosive charge.

    • @Sian-v2o
      @Sian-v2o 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      A classic case of one living in denial and a believer of Santa Claus .

    • @mikestewart4752
      @mikestewart4752 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@Sian-v2o Finally, this year nothing Made in China for Christmas!!! 😁👍👍

    • @Sian-v2o
      @Sian-v2o 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@mikestewart4752 the nothing for Christmas from China will stretched to nothing from China for the rest of days ahead. The image of empty shelves and long bread line of the Soviet era comes to mind. The US and the collective west will starve and be back to horse-drawn vehicles or wheelbarrows soon

    • @holboroman
      @holboroman 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Or a video made by their "AI"!

    • @derekng958
      @derekng958 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Don't worry! US Navy is the best in the world!

  • @Nikita4557
    @Nikita4557 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    I can't comment anything positive about China or it gets deleted. Wow are we that fucking threatened? 😅

    • @frostwing9046
      @frostwing9046 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Free world lol

    • @AmericanVice
      @AmericanVice 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Can’t comment anything negative either, thats TH-cam for you.

    • @garryh3126
      @garryh3126 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Mines been removed instantly 😔

  • @holboroman
    @holboroman 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    How long did they take to work out how to make a ball point pen?

  • @94Whiskey
    @94Whiskey 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    The "made in china" torpedo actually worked?

    • @louiswilliamterminator2887
      @louiswilliamterminator2887 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      150th time lucky!

    • @garryh3126
      @garryh3126 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Everything you use today is made in China either the product or electronic parts 😂 including your medication and pills all generic lol .
      Have another swig of whiskey 😂

    • @94Whiskey
      @94Whiskey 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@garryh3126 ....and your point is?

    • @gsyoou
      @gsyoou 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      China built the space station and the United States created genocide.

    • @94Whiskey
      @94Whiskey 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@garryh3126 if u think china is so awesome.....move to china bud. Let me know how that works out. Drink some good ol fake china made whiskey too😆😆😆😆

  • @georgewilson4245
    @georgewilson4245 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    WOW! A stationary ship. Such skillsets.

  • @jordandredge750
    @jordandredge750 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Looks like a small tourist boat. Not a ship

  • @SiphiweNyawera-qj2jr
    @SiphiweNyawera-qj2jr 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is an excellent report from China. So that all communication becomes very clear moving forward.

  • @Hmyt-yucca
    @Hmyt-yucca 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    China did it; it’s a bragging.
    Western country did it; it’s a breakthrough, perseverance, marvellous achievement & unprecedented.

    • @Jaysqualityparts
      @Jaysqualityparts 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      China did it they stole it more like.

  • @albertocaoili71
    @albertocaoili71 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

    Lack of war experience made. Chinese military a his incapability

    • @H1mynameisLarry
      @H1mynameisLarry 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      Proud American here but typical American thought process. Still bragging about successful wars from the 1940s. Every American soldier with true war experience is retired. Every active soldier today lacks modern war experience. It's been over 70 years since an American soldier sank another warship or shot down a modern aircraft lol and we got comments making fun of other countries' lack of experience when we have none also. All of our experiences are old and expired. We never seen a country with nukes, submarines, or even drones before. The reality is, that we have ONLY fought countries with NO Navy, Airforce, or a defense system recently... aka third-world countries.

    • @pimpmyride777
      @pimpmyride777 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      China is stronger than the Philippines. Go cry and talk about old wars. Its 2024. Your corrupt government failed for your people and weak Military 😂😂😂

    • @BrentDulnuan-bk6zs
      @BrentDulnuan-bk6zs 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@H1mynameisLarrykneel and bow to your Xi all china

    • @spartan7119
      @spartan7119 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@H1mynameisLarry
      Have you ever heard of operation praying, mantis? Also, during the Gulf War, the U.S. and its allies managed to take down the 4th largest military with very little casualties. Currently, in the Red Sea, U.S warships have also intercepted multiple drones, missiles, and even ballistic missiles(being the first time a warship is targeted by one and intercepted) which proves the effectiveness of the AEGIS systems capabilities.
      These are three examples, with the last one being the most recent, we still havent even seen any kind of combat from the Chinese.

    • @marshalljulie3676
      @marshalljulie3676 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      They fought across Africa and middle east as UN peace keepers. Plus now they are getting plenty of training from Russia based on modern warfare😂. US lacks the experience that's why they are sending troops disguised as mercenaries to Ukraine to learn trench warfare and how it feels to be on the receiving end of a 155mm round day and night.

  • @RobMedvedev
    @RobMedvedev 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    The world have been launching torpedoes since the 1930ts

    • @Eire32
      @Eire32 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Wrong WW1

    • @Babuka54
      @Babuka54 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Смотря куда и с какой скоростью!

    • @laosasean8482
      @laosasean8482 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      China invented gun powder a thousand years ago duh.

  • @齐天大圣-t5f
    @齐天大圣-t5f 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Congratulations on the 70th anniversary of China Navy.🎆

  • @thomasstuart6861
    @thomasstuart6861 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    That's not new technology but it is a step forward some nations, like Canada, are unable to achieve. I would not, however consider that the NATO group of nations have not advanced some unknown technologies during that interim. The problem unfortunately is not CPP technology but the ability to read, understand and adhere to UNCLOS agreements.

    • @jthom5951
      @jthom5951 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The 2016 "Tribunal ruling" by the PCA was brought by the Philippines at the instigation of the USA and its ruling has NO VALIDITY for the following reasons:
      The PCA is not a UN body and exceeded its authority in this matter.
      The arbitration ruling is non binding as China refused to be a participant in this sham / scam.
      The PCA ruling is in contravention of "The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties" which states that a later ruling cannot override or extinguish the rights of a member state's claims in an earlier treaty.
      UNCLOS explicitly recognizes the continuing validity of historical claims long before the disputing countries were sovereign entities.
      China’s historical claims, going back many centuries, are well recorded both in Chinese and non-Chinese documents (eg. Vietnam's 1958 agreement). China has consistently exercised sovereignty over the islands and reefs as well as the surrounding waters in the South China Sea. Therefore China has prior and rightful claims in the SCS.
      Lookup "Foreign Policy Journal: South China Sea: UN Law of the Sea Arbitration Tribunal Sinks the Rule of Law" as UNCLOS fully defends China's historical rights to the islands within the 10 dash lines in the SCS

    • @thomasstuart6861
      @thomasstuart6861 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@jthom5951 That's interesting. It does not matter who broucht it to debate, all that matters is the claim valid enough for a court to referree. The PCA is constituted through two separate multilateral conventions with a combined membership of 122 Contracting Parties but, as you say, it is not a UN agency, it is independent and this independence was agreed to by the 122 contracting Parties of the UN. It is an intergovernmental organization that provides dispute resolution services to the international community and I don't know how it is attached, perhaps you do, but to recieve any benefits in the UN converntions by signing the conventions through representation at the UN, automatically, to benefit, the nation must agree that other nations, including themselves have the right to defend their perspective through representation in a court of law, and that court of law was extablished as the PCA It has unparalleled experience in the administration of inter-State dispute resolution proceedings concerning oceans and the law of the sea. To benefit from the UNCLOS, the signator MUST agree if there is debate, then they MUST allow any signatory the right to bring any other signatory to the PCA. It was agreed but I don't know if it was a seperated document or inclusive with China's signing of UNCLOS. Interestingly, the USA is not a signatory and has not ratified it. So the USA can go whereever it wants. China should never have signed and there are penalties for breaking the agreement which included "BINDING" decission by PCA if There Was Any Disagreement. Now the PCA has recognized judges. China should know who the judges are an how they are chosen. If they disagree, then they should have petitioned for correction. You can't storm out of a court and claim corruption. If you do, a person is automatically considered guilty.

    • @thomasstuart6861
      @thomasstuart6861 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@jthom5951 Firstly, China agreed that the PCS was valid and signed the UNCLOS. The point is it doesnot matter what UNCLOS says if the PCA can over rule as long as there is no censorship. Don't tell it to me on this fools paradise. what censorship takes away. The place for this is in the PCA where there is not media censorship. After that, then they make more declarations. You cited the Venna Convention, in Article 85 does it not say, the treaty has not been ratified or acceded.

    • @jthom5951
      @jthom5951 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@thomasstuart6861 Lots of misinformation in your comments. China refused to be a participant in this PCA scam and so certainly did not agree that the PCA ruling was valid. China also did not sign away their rights by joining UNCLOS. Why would they sign away these rights when they are protected by "The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties"? There are exception clauses for similar cases in UNCLOS.
      The PCA is a "for hire" arbitration tribunal and is NOT a UN body although it shares its premises with the UN. Its decisions are not legally binding. The PCA and UNCLOS also have no jurisdiction over territorial disputes. Only the ICJ has that authority and thus that begs the question, "Why did the Philippines take this to the PCA instead of the ICJ if they were so certain of their case. Was it because they knew they had no leg to stand on in this sham and would have had to return the islands they stole" ?
      China's historical claims are well documented and go as far back as 500 BC. UNCLOS only came into being in 1982 long after the 11 dash lines were reaffirmed by China after WW2, ironically with the help of the US Navy. This was before any of these disputing countries in the SCS became sovereign states. The PRC later reduced this to the 9 dash lines to accommodate Vietnam.
      Thus UNCLOS explicitly recognizes and defends the continuing validity of China’s historical claims and therefore those islands in the SCS belong to China with an EEZ of 200 nmi around each island. The Philippines disingenuously beached a ship on one of these islands to create a presence in this area to aid their claim. This theft is in contravention of UNCLOS and does not give the PH the right to these islands and their accompanying EEZs
      Some fun facts that our msm also hide from us. Vietnam has 10 outposts in the SCS. Philippines has 9, Malaysia has 8 and China only has 4.
      Vietnam was the first to militarize outposts in the SCS.
      Please at least research "Foreign Policy Journal: South China Sea: UN Law of the Sea Arbitration Tribunal Sinks the Rule of Law"

    • @jthom5951
      @jthom5951 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@thomasstuart6861 My reply to you which was valid and informative has been deleted by YT. So I will repeat until the cows come home to protect my right of free speech.
      Lots of misinformation in your comments. China refused to be a participant in this PCA scam and so certainly did not agree that the PCA ruling was valid. China also did not sign away their rights by joining UNCLOS. Why would they sign away these rights when they are protected by "The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties"? There are exception clauses for similar cases in UNCLOS.
      The PCA is a "for hire" arbitration tribunal and is NOT a UN body although it shares its premises with the UN. Its decisions are not legally binding. The PCA and UNCLOS also have no jurisdiction over territorial disputes. Only the ICJ has that authority and thus that begs the question, "Why did the Philippines take this to the PCA instead of the ICJ if they were so certain of their case. Was it because they knew they had no leg to stand on in this sham and would have had to return the islands they stole" ?
      China's historical claims are well documented and go as far back as 500 BC. UNCLOS only came into being in 1982 long after the 11 dash lines were reaffirmed by China after WW2, ironically with the help of the US Navy. This was before any of these disputing countries in the SCS became sovereign states. The PRC later reduced this to the 9 dash lines to accommodate Vietnam.
      Thus UNCLOS explicitly recognizes and defends the continuing validity of China’s historical claims and therefore those islands in the SCS belong to China with an EEZ of 200 nmi around each island. The Philippines disingenuously beached a ship on one of these islands to create a presence in this area to aid their claim. This theft is in contravention of UNCLOS and does not give the PH the right to these islands and their accompanying EEZs
      Some fun facts that our msm also hide from us. Vietnam has 10 outposts in the SCS. Philippines has 9, Malaysia has 8 and China only has 4.
      Vietnam was the first to militarize outposts in the SCS.
      Please at least research "Foreign Policy Journal: South China Sea: UN Law of the Sea Arbitration Tribunal Sinks the Rule of Law"

  • @numeloncjrpaza8503
    @numeloncjrpaza8503 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    No match up submarine from u.s helena fast attack submarine nuclear from china.

  • @LisaDiggin4595
    @LisaDiggin4595 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    USA- we had an Alien technology

  • @junmarborja929
    @junmarborja929 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    it is totally different in a real war ship that is moving .yes it cause damage to a ship like was seen here it's a sitting duck that can not retaliate

  • @snaked1984
    @snaked1984 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Calling china's navy the world's largest is like someone with a yard full of junkers saying they have a collection of 30 cars. Pretty sure they count the bath tubs in the wash rooms on land as naval vessels over there.

  • @RochellOfalla
    @RochellOfalla 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Jia you Zhong Guo ❤️🇨🇳💪

  • @elleni4499
    @elleni4499 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    GOD BLESS EVERYONE

  • @dmantia
    @dmantia 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    seems like a propaganda piece....this is pure bluster......

  • @MarLac-uz3jx
    @MarLac-uz3jx 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    A very light weight landing craft that is why it lift up easily when hitted by heavy torpedoe.

  • @huas5350
    @huas5350 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    YU-10, a torpedo of the same level as the MK-48 MOD7, India currently does not have a comparable object of the same level.

  • @DioXin
    @DioXin หลายเดือนก่อน

    Pooh happy with his little toy 🐻🍯

  • @N0P3Sugar
    @N0P3Sugar 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    They say never give an evil person power for the said person will use it for Evil things.

  • @flamingknight5130
    @flamingknight5130 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    That's only a small boat try a bigger one if its gonna sunk😂🤣🤣

  • @franciscalixto2049
    @franciscalixto2049 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Oh what a breakthrough 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 bark bark bark

  • @phjab1281
    @phjab1281 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Wait The Hacker Destroy Your Control Room 😂

  • @BenhurBaguio
    @BenhurBaguio 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    BYD torpedoes goes greentech 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

  • @samrolfe2563
    @samrolfe2563 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Supercavitating hypersonic torpedo.
    They create a plasma of super heated gas in front of the torpedo which allows it to travel at thousands of kilometers an hour under water - sure, im sure America has this too - just like they have active hypersonic weapons - lols.

  • @Eugene-w6k
    @Eugene-w6k 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Chinese submarines are still less quiet than western subs, and thats what will matter..

    • @benjavier8262
      @benjavier8262 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I disagree, what matters is that our mini subs that are are built and specifically designed to track and hunt enemy subs w out being detected have already been on their a$$’s and we have a “lock” on them thats what matters💯fact

  • @Infiniti_Rico
    @Infiniti_Rico 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Congratulations China.
    Welcome to the 1950's.

  • @ICEMAN2002BENZ
    @ICEMAN2002BENZ 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    US Navy.......let's party

  • @MayankKumar-z5t
    @MayankKumar-z5t 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I also heard that china is about to build a elevator to space is it possible 😅😅😅

  • @panzersquadph1361
    @panzersquadph1361 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Made in China quality always renewable😁

  • @alyasagan3620
    @alyasagan3620 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Made in China reach the moon a.d mars almost flawless everytime

  • @CarolJorgensen-oj8tz
    @CarolJorgensen-oj8tz 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Precision?? It was an unmanned sitting duck!

  • @wionporky9937
    @wionporky9937 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Stop that.
    CRUX you are frightening all the Indians 😮😮😮

  • @fritzmordred4874
    @fritzmordred4874 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    So they're saying that it only takes one hit to sink their ship's? As they show how powerful they are😂😂😂, then no need to worry 😂😂
    Made in cryna will always be made in cryna, A Paper

  • @jefrey123
    @jefrey123 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Its modern its a submarine paper never start a war but it's explode cant you see that 55 sailor died at the submarine

  • @nolidiaz1962
    @nolidiaz1962 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The truth is all of thise were just a good rehearsal and edited. But when it comes to actual combat everything will get malfunction. No quality product of PLA . Just being used to intimedate their neighbors

  • @Wvavy
    @Wvavy 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    America has had this for years 😂😂😂

    • @Jaysqualityparts
      @Jaysqualityparts 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      75

    • @laosasean8482
      @laosasean8482 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Without Chinese invented the gun powder the paleface won't be able to stolen the continent from the Native American and Aborigine people.

  • @reanontengson5338
    @reanontengson5338 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Meanwhile other countries already have sophisticated anti submarine force.

  • @jeromepacheco6005
    @jeromepacheco6005 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Modern pirates

  • @Golden_Rule_Truth
    @Golden_Rule_Truth 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    they so scary

  • @akal7885
    @akal7885 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    means f** around and found out who we are !!.

  • @allanbaldoque2578
    @allanbaldoque2578 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Whay does it means, we dont have to fight in case of chiness agression? Exercise or military drill is defferent on real battle 😊😊

  • @Kiminoyana
    @Kiminoyana 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    The Earth is not interested on that foolishness

  • @mcrick8931
    @mcrick8931 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    When AI enters the picture for all these ships.........😎 LOOK OUT

  • @heatherhayes9498
    @heatherhayes9498 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉

  • @BenhurBaguio
    @BenhurBaguio 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    China now have SCUD TORPEDO that can hit none moving target with high precision of +/_ 500 meters😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

  • @eddielangaman
    @eddielangaman 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Go to war and see it by yourself if is not a myth,

  • @JosephOrdeniza
    @JosephOrdeniza 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    They are just strong for weak countries like My homeland Philippines but got no balls poking USA.👌

  • @onewade1974
    @onewade1974 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What makes people believe that they have nuclear powered submarines? I'm not saying they do or don't but I'd like to see something that points in the direction. They don't have nuclear powered aircraft carriers, and that's much easier to do. You would think that they we would come first

    • @General_MacArthur
      @General_MacArthur 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      And all intel comes from western sources.

  • @rickjames18
    @rickjames18 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Wait, they used a torpedo? and that that is a breakthrough according to China? I don't get it, any have already done this for decades. Is the CPP gaslighting because their equipment sucks or what?

    • @Jacksonlgf
      @Jacksonlgf 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      你当然得不明白,如果能随随便便让你明白这个里面的意义,中国就不会变成超级大国了

  • @Fy20fy
    @Fy20fy 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    We used to think westerner are smarter than us , but …….😂.

  • @kateblack4221
    @kateblack4221 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    AMERICA "🇺🇸" ACHIEVED this more than "50" year's "AGO"....

  • @Adam.NavyVet
    @Adam.NavyVet 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Not a torpedo hit. Planted explosives. If it was a torpedo it almost missed to the stern. Fake video and not a torpedo. No torpedo trail anywhere.

  • @ahmedhersi9169
    @ahmedhersi9169 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is not Houthis missiles😭

  • @zakazan8561
    @zakazan8561 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    oh damn, china figured out how to launch a torpedo without it destroying the ship that launched it. We're done now

    • @fStormen
      @fStormen 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      No no lo destruyó pero si le abrió una gran brecha en el piso

  • @evergreen8165
    @evergreen8165 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    breakthrough? uhmmm. what era are you from? 😂

  • @peruvianbreed8719
    @peruvianbreed8719 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Ban this kind of propaganda.report this youtuber.

  • @eyes1181
    @eyes1181 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    If PiLipinos wil DIE. U ALSO CHINA WIL DIE TOO IN WAR. SO GO,GO,GO,

  • @grayhelium513
    @grayhelium513 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Yet they are not well trained like the us soldier..

  • @AMIT-ku9nd
    @AMIT-ku9nd 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Launched on 17 May 1897 at Navy Lt. Lewis Nixon's Crescent Shipyard in Elizabeth, New Jersey, the Holland VI was purchased by the United States Navy on 11 April 1900, becoming the United States Navy's first commissioned submarine and renamed USS Holland.
    100 years late. And they probably stole that like they do everything else LOL Bootleggers!

  • @leoissac657
    @leoissac657 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    China is economically strong. Military wise they need Russia.

    • @General_MacArthur
      @General_MacArthur 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I dont see Russia having a mass fleet of stealth fighters like the j-20 or fc-31 in which russia only has 5😂😂😂😂

  • @alpokoy2008
    @alpokoy2008 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    do not afraed china they are not win the war!

  • @derekng958
    @derekng958 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Don't worry! US Navy is the best in the world!

    • @aliangkasa5813
      @aliangkasa5813 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Bestari in the holywood film😅😅😅😅

  • @irishorong3730
    @irishorong3730 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    thats made in china!🎉

  • @johndyson4109
    @johndyson4109 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I bet the Chinese put extra explosives on the target ship to make it LOOK devastating... LOL... I wonder what Bruce Lee would think of his country now if he were still alive?

  • @ZeusLongcayana
    @ZeusLongcayana 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    but scare of invading taiwan 😂🤣😅😆

  • @nammeneo
    @nammeneo 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Chinese made of wood. Its for show.

  • @elmercolinares2
    @elmercolinares2 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Just like there robot...nickname..lobat

  • @EZsWaterBoy
    @EZsWaterBoy 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Kinuha pa yung bag! at naglabas ng axe at knife yung mga Chinese. Nanggalaiti na talaga ako sa mga Chinese na to. Sana boss inubos nyo na gamit ng bala nag labas naman pala sila ng Armas at threat na yan eh

    • @SoccerNutTV
      @SoccerNutTV 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Bakit ka umiiyak

    • @useqsepng
      @useqsepng 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      😂

  • @ailah2
    @ailah2 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is obselete already america and allies has it for long time, 😂, america have nuclear aircraft submarine and ship what are you bragging for, your sub and ships are just copycat, low quality

  • @jamesjadloc9664
    @jamesjadloc9664 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Whatever..

  • @Rider_in_Thunder
    @Rider_in_Thunder 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    😂😂😂😂😂

  • @raymondtjoen837
    @raymondtjoen837 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I will not comment on these comments, but merely compare the facts of the past half century.
    For example, who had to flee Vietnam in 1970-1975, even though it was the largest and strongest army in the world? In 2020, who choose to take the haze path to run out of Afghanistan for men on mopeds and pajamas, even without advanced weapons and advanced equipment. Also pretending to be the strongest NATO in the world. Can you explain it to me?

    • @benjavier8262
      @benjavier8262 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Your selective memory deceives you. The US pulled outta vietnam bcoz richard nixon was elected president and his promise to the american people if elected is that he would pull all troops outta vietnam, it was an unpopular war and the mothers and fathers of the 18-19 year old kids who were coming back in body bags was more than the american people could bare. As for afhganistan we whooped that ass, the same ass russia couldnt beat lol

  • @vicfallaria541
    @vicfallaria541 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The most Bully Navy I think

  • @AliceHLin-l7j
    @AliceHLin-l7j 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    President Xi has represented the 'wise face' of Chinese. May the Living God opens a way to turn Chinese from Communist ideology to seek the God of Christianity, the loving and True God. God who loves Israel, Americans, Arabs, must love Chinese as well.. as God creates so many Chinese in this planet. May God continues to put peace into the US presidents and president Xi who stands for peace until today, AD 2024

  • @WinningSoulsForChristMinistry
    @WinningSoulsForChristMinistry 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    We rebuke the evil forces and their wicked plans and intent that cause war and hatred on earth, may all the evil forces be stopped and break their plans. In the mighty name of JESUS we pray/ AMEN.

  • @koushikmukherjee9465
    @koushikmukherjee9465 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Winee the phoo 😂

  • @evavieirapereira786
    @evavieirapereira786 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Deus é o único dono do universo mundial Deus acima de tudo e de todos no céu e na terra 🌎 glória glória sem seça em gratidão por nossa vidas por nossas Liberdade 🗽 🗽 Liberdade ❤️

  • @ElizabethJobe
    @ElizabethJobe 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    And that fake

  • @clavo3352
    @clavo3352 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Most unfortunate predictable juvenile comment responses. Taking this alarmist bait proved the test and the Chinese are predictably watching the emotional tribal response. Supremacy dominance, at this point, is for the emotionally insecure and/or the self-referencing paranoid.

  • @johndafoe3408
    @johndafoe3408 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The bearer of fake items

  • @ZainalAbdi-xn8bh
    @ZainalAbdi-xn8bh 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Negara mana lagi yg mau ku rudal aku pasti menang😂😂

  • @RockLine92
    @RockLine92 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Why are you showing this to us???
    in India we are happy with Hindu Muslim that is enough for us.
    Who eat meat who wears what??? that is more important issues for us?