great product but personally worry about especially in the UK where tasers can and a lot of of the time will be used in close range where 1 trigger pull is all you'll get which is why having to fire 1 at a time can be worrisome
Taser isn’t meant to be used at such a close distance. If you’re that close, you need to disengage and get a safe distance or get subject control. I get your point though.
Taser 7 is $1700. Taser 10 is that +8 shots and a higher IP rating plus it can be deployed at twice the distance. I can hear $3000 but want to see sub $2500.
If anything, why not, if possible, have the Taser 10 programmed, or maybe a switch similar to a safety switch, to shoot 2 probes, then 1 on the next trigger press, then 2 on the 3rd trigger press, then 1 on the 4th, and 2 on the 5th. Or maybe a mode where it only shoots the probes in pairs?
The problem with that is that the taser cartridge is set to shoot completely straight. The taser would have to be redesigned with the taser cartridges at an angle for it to spread and have an effective connection.
I need to see the real world applications. One probe at a time is worrisome. I thought it would’ve made more send to fire 2 probes the first trigger pull and then deploying one probe at a time if a connection wasn’t made with the first two.
Maybe make a feature so that you can select what firing mode you would like in the cid. Two probe mode or single probe mode would be better than just being restricted to only one probe, but it might make the device more complicated than it already is.
I think they are trying to combat one of the main issues with tasers which is probe placements and probe misses. A lot of folks tend to miss the placement of the lower probe. This would mitigate that a bit but I also agree that it adds another step to the process.
I don't understand why they don't just make a less then lethal rifle that can just go full auto and go through hoodies and thick jackets, there would be almost no reason to use a gun at that point.
Okay.. But now you have to land two shots. how about the chance of them pulling out the initial one before any NMI happens with the second one having to land. I feel like there is a higher chance of failure to contain the problem, because there is now a time frame at which people can react. Am I missing something here? because this is just another big issue I see.
Or this th-cam.com/video/GKBCs6wHZEs/w-d-xo.html, tasers have become such a crutch in LE. Learn to go hands on with someone, and I will always meet a deadly force threat WITH DEADLY FORCE!
@@roughmanready "learn to go hands on" ok... But why if you don't need to go hands on? What if they have a concealed knife, hands on and you get your throat slit and choke on your blood as the suspect takes your gun. Or you get your head slashed, or stabbed, or something. Hands on is an unnecessary risk. Not to mention there's also the bolo wrap that's being introduced to police departments.
@@John-Smith02 learn to go hands on because tasers work less than 50% of the time and I don’t see this design being much better. I’m only an Axon certified instructor with countless deployments on duty but what do I know. The Bolo wrap is the biggest piece of crap I have ever had the chance try. Learn to go hands and affectively control a combative subject, hold yourself to a higher level of physical fitness, and learn how to legally apply deadly force so that if that time comes you don’t hesitate. Just my two cents.
@@roughmanready ok...but you didn't mention how you're going to gain compliance in a suspect who has a hidden knife and stabs you in the eye or neck or slashes you by surprise because it was hidden. You can be the most tough human being on earth, unless you have an insane pain tolerance, or you are literally physically incapable of feeling pain, you would feel a slash, or a stab, and you would most likely recoil. Giving the suspect time for another ambush attack or something like reach for a gun.
Completely agree! With the power reduction of the X26P, X3, X2, & 7, you just don’t get the reliable muscle lock of the X26. This is why Tasing videos from 15 years ago when both probes hit show the suspect becoming a stiff board and hitting the ground. You just don’t see it with any of the replacement Tasers…
@Active Security Officer It is a big trade off that they removed the drive stun for having 10 single shot probes. I really wish they could have done this without sacrificing good features from their past models. I heard that the Taser 10 is also regulated under ATF now.
@@David-fp7yc They are only regulating the Taser 10 OC, which includes concurrent dispensing of a stream of flammable OC spray which is then ignited by the probes. Only their officers may carry this variant. It works especially well on small dogs...hot diggity dog.
😂 because tasers in general are 50% reliable on their best day in a real world situation. These taser 10s are horribly unreliable compared to the 7 and 26p even with multiple probes on target with good spread.
Only fires one probe at a time so now the operatorcan control the spread of the probes. Have to keep that minimum distance between the probes to be completely effective. The biggest problem I have had with prior models was the fact one of the probes would miss. If both probes are not in contact with the suspect then the taser will not work. I did like the X3 (that carried 3 cartridges) and the 7 (that carries 2) with multiple cartridges but I think this new 10 will be much more effective. I am curious how these probes will penetrate thick jackets. And what is the cost to replace a cartridge that contains 10 probes? $40 $100?
The cartridges are $22 a pop, so a full mag of 10 shots is $220. Then you have the actual magazine housing, which by itself is $160, so you are paying a total of $400+ with taxes.
Very awesome! As a State of Arizona Ranger I love my X2. I was very privileged to be part of the testing. I hope someday I can carry the Taser 10. Would be an awesome opportunity to educate others out on the field while in service. Thank you
Assuming you're telling the truth and not claiming to be a Leo for nothing, and since you claim to have been part of the testing of it. 1. Doesn't that require 2 shots then? And if so, how is that not more stressful and more difficult than firing once that shoots two probes? (I'm not talking about the amount it carries, 10, that's an obvious upside/upgrade)
This looks cool but.....one probe fired at a time? That sounds worse. It looks like the officer would have to aim both. I mean I guess it could be rapid fire but my understanding is to gain compliance or induce NMI, the probes that connect have to be something like at least 1 foot(12 inches) apart from each other. (I own a Taser Pulse+ I purchased myself, though if money wasn't a factor, or if I could choose one free taser of my choice, hands down it would be the Taser 7)
Two main issues: 1. This thing looks gigantic, significantly bigger than the 7 and that was never addressed. How much larger are we going to make all these less lethals until it affects the way we can move. Most agencies still don’t have load bearing vests or don’t allow officers to carry the taser on the vest. Why not make it magazine fed at this point and reduce the form factor? 2. It is already hard enough to get the probes on target in high stress situations or when running, this makes us have to get at-least two on target when in that high stress situation. Agencies are bound to make policies on how many rounds you can use on one subject. It should fire two at a time the same way the taser 7 fires while being able to ‘flick’ the taser to change the range. That way you have 5 firing chances to get a good connection; which is much better than firing round after round, wires and probes going everywhere trying to make a good connection. REMEMBER these will have to be very precise shots to give NMI, if you double tap two probes directly in the muscle group of the back, you are most likely not going to get full NMI. Bonus issue kind of tied into 2. Because you have to aim two shots with enough distance betwixt the two to achieve NMI, you lose the SURPRISE of the Taser. They now have a chance to rip the first probe out before NMI is achieved.
@@David-fp7yc I agree. It also doesn't look that much bigger than the Taser 7. Though, I obviously can't really see them in person for a good comparison
@@John-Smith02 I can tell from looking it uses the exact same rechargeable battery as the Taser 7. It would make a lot of sense of they allow police departments to reuse their newly acquired Taser 7 batteries and docks.
I’ve seen both up close and can confirm the T7 is VERY close in size to T10. It’s hard to tell the size difference unless you hold them next to each other.
I have three questions: Can the Taser 10 be purchased by private security? Will there be a civilian magazine fed taser in the works as well? Will there be a trade in program for Taser 7 and older models?
@@JasonSmith-ee7zq Exactly..... LE versions are way more restrictive. Taser civilian models are meant for you to stop the threat and then YOU get away from the situation ..... LE models are based on the need for LEOs to SUBDUE the person.
the taser 10 seems like a very good long range taser, however it has no drive stun feature that I could find, so for now the X2 and X7 seem like a better option for police
While they didnt state it, the sequential firing will be a game changer in struggles. Now instead of being forced to drive stun, you deliberately place a barb in two distant locations for full nmi. Though im not 100% sure thats true or supported by the new manual of arms. The only question remains is will the officer on thw street be able to aim well enough under pressure?
Not sure about the shooting 1 probe at a time. All the suspects have to do is quickly pull out the first hit before the 2nd hit to avoid nmi. Everything else seems great.
I guess if they stop to remove probes that's buying officers time to apprehend, or it could make them compliant knowing that a second probe is moments away from making them go very stiff
This video over and over is basically arguing this taser would/should be used in place of a firearm. If someone is a deadly threat, lethal force should be used. not a taser of any kind, even if it had 50 probes. should it technically be very efficient in less lethal scenarios? yeah. But why does it keep talking about lowering gun related deaths like police are using their service pistols on people who aren't posing a deadly threat.
It’s the woke society that needs to change, they think police are the issue. I’m certain the girl with the dreads in this video is not helping. Police will continue to be expected to risk their lives needlessly in an attempt to use less lethal force when lethal force may be necessary. I’m sure this will come in handy but there will always be a need for lethal force and it should never be downgraded when needed. I get this is a great supplementary tool but that’s all it is.
hopefully in 10-15 years (if not sooner, i'm being conservative here) we'll have the battery technology (more efficient, reliable, and compact) and propellent coupled with a reliable wireless signal to allow something like this to work Without the wires. But as it is now it's still very impressive and exciting.
They had the shotgun that shot out wireless probes that were huge. I’m not really sure what the issues were with it though that made them decide to discontinue it but I’ve said the same thing. I hate that these have thin delicate wires that can break if the person pulls on them or rolls around. It would be a game changer for the 10 to be wireless! Maybe soon like you said.
@@brightbkh07 Being that the shotgun xrep was made nearly 2 decades ago, it's possible that maybe in a decade or less we'll have a miniaturized version of it with more reliable and better micro batteries and chips to ensure they're more reliable and effective. But also able to fit a pistol or semi auto carbine or at the very least a revolver.
I think it's a good idea, but not just make it available to law but also ccw carriers it could reduce those trigger happy people or those that are in a life situation would drop also the reason of a civilian carrying a fire arm instead of using deadly force cause he fears for his life he can stop the threat as well in a moments needed.
It would be expensive to make a wireless probe that can stun someone. If anything, the ammunition would be more expensive than the weapon. Plus a wireless connection to a probe could potentially fail, which would consequently kill the perpetrator due to excessive electric damage, rather than the intended use of immobilising said perpetrator. It’s easier to have a wire connection to the probe, which can be shut off quickly by the user, avoiding a potential death.
The problem I have with this is how the training has gone in the last 20 years. Originally when the tazer was available there were very few areas that you were to avoid and even hitting them was better than shooting the person. Since then tazer has added larger avoid areas and the use of force level of tazer has been elevated much higher. They talk about how it could cause heart problems even though the initial research and marketing said the pulses were not able to effect the heart. I do not blame law enforcement or the courts for this but the inability to provide legal representation in these cases where they created bad case law. I can tell you that 99% of the screaming and agony that you hear on body cameras is usually A) after the taser was turned off and B) because the person hit was losing it that the police didn't allow them to just continue their rampage.
5k USD. Not too bad. A person's life is worth a lot more than that. Less people in hospital, less permanent injuries and deaths etc... the list goes on.
Gotta be very careful with your wording. It sounds like you're advocating using less lethal force in a deadly force situation. Deadly force isn't just used because "it's effective" it's used to stop A DEADLY THREAT. If some one pulls a gun on you and you pull a taser, no matter which one, you're doing something very wrong. Tasers are NOT 100% effective in all situations, even with 10 rounds. That said....... It's nice to see that this solves a serious issue with past tasers, Spread. It's MUCH better that you can put out multiple barbs in non deadly force situations in order to control your own spread, making it more likely to be effective at various ranges. Up close it's almost useless since you have to rely on drive stunning, which doesn't create NMI. Also have to think about stress factors when deploying since it's one barb at a time. It's not uncommon for officers to shoot way more rounds than they thought or hold the taser trigger for longer than they thought when in these situations. I think this is a great step forward but just be careful how you market this or how you say things.
Man! Tasers are becoming like PlayStations? They keep getting better and better, but pricier and pricier! With the better technology also comes more training which is pretty great! 👍
First off this sounds like you all are trying to eliminate the need for deadly force. Which a less than lethal option will never be able to do. Although Taser does fit a certain type of scenario you should never NEVER ever use a less than lethal option on a lethal threat.
Damn y'all stroke it slowly only to not give us a decent release. You didn't show it in use You didn't't mention dry stun You didn't give a price point
Came here to say these are incredibly unreliable compared to the previous generations. Multiple shots in light clothing are ineffective even to the point of two different tasers having multiple shots on target with good probe spread. The running theory is it is because the significantly reduced power utilized that no longer generates the air gap from probe to skin through the clothing barrier but axon cant seem to figure out what it is. Buyer beware.
I'm sorry but no matter how sophisticated these get IMO it doesn't mean shit to me. When the use of a taser is in the same level of force on the use of force "matrix" "or what ever your state calls it now" as the firearm I'm going to go to my gun over the taser every time. Why? because I'm better with it, I get to train with it more, I know it'll work everytime whereas the taser doesn't, and many more reasons. How bout we PUNISH the violent offenders instead of letting them out so we have to deal with them again and again instead of coming up with new ways to safely detain them while they're trying to KILL you??
Pretty cool, but I'm waiting for a taser like the one in that one TV Show APB. How come you can't design one like this one: th-cam.com/video/OuXR0F6ZQzc/w-d-xo.html
not even showing the price = civilians won't be able to afford. also forget the rechargeable batteries, use batteries anyone can get like CR123's. that being said you solved one of my main complaints about these tasers and it's ammo. Granted I can't imagine how much those cartridges will cost in comparison to regular ammo and a firearm.
![แฉกลโกงงานวัด 2024 [ โกงมั้ยครับ ep.106 ] | DOM](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/taC5dpP3HXA/mqdefault.jpg)
great product but personally worry about especially in the UK where tasers can and a lot of of the time will be used in close range where 1 trigger pull is all you'll get which is why having to fire 1 at a time can be worrisome
Hopefully a prolonged use of the trigger would prompt the device to systematically eject multiple barbs until the trigger is released.
Taser isn’t meant to be used at such a close distance. If you’re that close, you need to disengage and get a safe distance or get subject control. I get your point though.
Hope your not officer with that thinking
You know this one is going to be expensive
@Active Security Officer depends on how smart the threat is iv met up dumb MFs with Guns and they weren't a good shot at all
Wonder how much is going to be
Taser 7 is $1700. Taser 10 is that +8 shots and a higher IP rating plus it can be deployed at twice the distance. I can hear $3000 but want to see sub $2500.
@@whoa6375 Price increased $1960.
The interesting thing is, axon make most of their money from cloud storage and memory. The actual device is cheap compared to the data storage
"Why did you hit him with all 10 shots?"
"Sir, I only had 10 shots."
😂🤣😂
If anything, why not, if possible, have the Taser 10 programmed, or maybe a switch similar to a safety switch, to shoot 2 probes, then 1 on the next trigger press, then 2 on the 3rd trigger press, then 1 on the 4th, and 2 on the 5th. Or maybe a mode where it only shoots the probes in pairs?
The problem with that is that the taser cartridge is set to shoot completely straight. The taser would have to be redesigned with the taser cartridges at an angle for it to spread and have an effective connection.
I need to see the real world applications. One probe at a time is worrisome. I thought it would’ve made more send to fire 2 probes the first trigger pull and then deploying one probe at a time if a connection wasn’t made with the first two.
Maybe make a feature so that you can select what firing mode you would like in the cid.
Two probe mode or single probe mode would be better than just being restricted to only one probe, but it might make the device more complicated than it already is.
I think they are trying to combat one of the main issues with tasers which is probe placements and probe misses. A lot of folks tend to miss the placement of the lower probe. This would mitigate that a bit but I also agree that it adds another step to the process.
I don't understand why they don't just make a less then lethal rifle that can just go full auto and go through hoodies and thick jackets, there would be almost no reason to use a gun at that point.
@@tonybadaboni 😆😆😆😆
Yeah, why can't they design one like this one: th-cam.com/video/OuXR0F6ZQzc/w-d-xo.html
Okay.. But now you have to land two shots. how about the chance of them pulling out the initial one before any NMI happens with the second one having to land. I feel like there is a higher chance of failure to contain the problem, because there is now a time frame at which people can react. Am I missing something here? because this is just another big issue I see.
Or this th-cam.com/video/GKBCs6wHZEs/w-d-xo.html, tasers have become such a crutch in LE. Learn to go hands on with someone, and I will always meet a deadly force threat WITH DEADLY FORCE!
@@roughmanready "learn to go hands on" ok... But why if you don't need to go hands on? What if they have a concealed knife, hands on and you get your throat slit and choke on your blood as the suspect takes your gun. Or you get your head slashed, or stabbed, or something. Hands on is an unnecessary risk. Not to mention there's also the bolo wrap that's being introduced to police departments.
@@John-Smith02 learn to go hands on because tasers work less than 50% of the time and I don’t see this design being much better. I’m only an Axon certified instructor with countless deployments on duty but what do I know. The Bolo wrap is the biggest piece of crap I have ever had the chance try. Learn to go hands and affectively control a combative subject, hold yourself to a higher level of physical fitness, and learn how to legally apply deadly force so that if that time comes you don’t hesitate. Just my two cents.
@@roughmanready ok...but you didn't mention how you're going to gain compliance in a suspect who has a hidden knife and stabs you in the eye or neck or slashes you by surprise because it was hidden. You can be the most tough human being on earth, unless you have an insane pain tolerance, or you are literally physically incapable of feeling pain, you would feel a slash, or a stab, and you would most likely recoil. Giving the suspect time for another ambush attack or something like reach for a gun.
@godspeed646 10/10 brain cells fo sho, but @@roughmanreadyyou’re blind. You’re the kinda dude that says “Shut up, I can’t see” idiot…
X26 will always be bae. That is the best Taser ever produced.
Completely agree! With the power reduction of the X26P, X3, X2, & 7, you just don’t get the reliable muscle lock of the X26. This is why Tasing videos from 15 years ago when both probes hit show the suspect becoming a stiff board and hitting the ground. You just don’t see it with any of the replacement Tasers…
I rarely heard anything bad about the X26 besides it only having one shot, no duel lasers, and expensive batteries.
My tazer pulse never fails always come in handy never know I love the product so far ❤❤❤❤
X26 was trash!!! Did u guys run them on patrol? Or as SROs?
@@rincon3315this Noob
So... can this taser drive stun? Or is it only usable if you have appropriate standoff distance and contact shots?
No drive stun from what I was told.
@Active Security Officer It is a big trade off that they removed the drive stun for having 10 single shot probes. I really wish they could have done this without sacrificing good features from their past models.
I heard that the Taser 10 is also regulated under ATF now.
@@David-fp7yc They are only regulating the Taser 10 OC, which includes concurrent dispensing of a stream of flammable OC spray which is then ignited by the probes. Only their officers may carry this variant. It works especially well on small dogs...hot diggity dog.
I like the fact that it's high capacity. The flashlight and laser sight are also big pluses too. The biggesr thing is the farther range.
Is there a price point and an availability date?
Why does an officer ever need to use lethal force. Because you're not stopping an active shooter, armed with a rifle with a taser.
Exactly. When a perp pulls a firearm, the taser gets DROPPED!
😂 because tasers in general are 50% reliable on their best day in a real world situation. These taser 10s are horribly unreliable compared to the 7 and 26p even with multiple probes on target with good spread.
Only fires one probe at a time so now the operatorcan control the spread of the probes. Have to keep that minimum distance between the probes to be completely effective. The biggest problem I have had with prior models was the fact one of the probes would miss. If both probes are not in contact with the suspect then the taser will not work. I did like the X3 (that carried 3 cartridges) and the 7 (that carries 2) with multiple cartridges but I think this new 10 will be much more effective. I am curious how these probes will penetrate thick jackets. And what is the cost to replace a cartridge that contains 10 probes? $40 $100?
The cartridges are $22 a pop, so a full mag of 10 shots is $220.
Then you have the actual magazine housing, which by itself is $160, so you are paying a total of $400+ with taxes.
Very awesome! As a State of Arizona Ranger I love my X2. I was very privileged to be part of the testing. I hope someday I can carry the Taser 10. Would be an awesome opportunity to educate others out on the field while in service. Thank you
Assuming you're telling the truth and not claiming to be a Leo for nothing, and since you claim to have been part of the testing of it.
1. Doesn't that require 2 shots then? And if so, how is that not more stressful and more difficult than firing once that shoots two probes? (I'm not talking about the amount it carries, 10, that's an obvious upside/upgrade)
@@dm7uy apparently only 4 probes can connect/talk to each other. I'm guessing that makes the connection if there's enough spread.
@@John-Smith02 here's my story. Thank you for replying.
th-cam.com/video/hHHwPfgggXg/w-d-xo.html
I’m so proud of you, my babies. I can’t believe what you’ve done for us ALL.
Next............wireless probes!!!!!
Fun fact, there used to be a shotgun that fired self-contained Taser probes called the X12.
This looks cool but.....one probe fired at a time? That sounds worse. It looks like the officer would have to aim both. I mean I guess it could be rapid fire but my understanding is to gain compliance or induce NMI, the probes that connect have to be something like at least 1 foot(12 inches) apart from each other.
(I own a Taser Pulse+ I purchased myself, though if money wasn't a factor, or if I could choose one free taser of my choice, hands down it would be the Taser 7)
Two main issues:
1. This thing looks gigantic, significantly bigger than the 7 and that was never addressed. How much larger are we going to make all these less lethals until it affects the way we can move. Most agencies still don’t have load bearing vests or don’t allow officers to carry the taser on the vest. Why not make it magazine fed at this point and reduce the form factor?
2. It is already hard enough to get the probes on target in high stress situations or when running, this makes us have to get at-least two on target when in that high stress situation. Agencies are bound to make policies on how many rounds you can use on one subject. It should fire two at a time the same way the taser 7 fires while being able to ‘flick’ the taser to change the range. That way you have 5 firing chances to get a good connection; which is much better than firing round after round, wires and probes going everywhere trying to make a good connection. REMEMBER these will have to be very precise shots to give NMI, if you double tap two probes directly in the muscle group of the back, you are most likely not going to get full NMI.
Bonus issue kind of tied into 2. Because you have to aim two shots with enough distance betwixt the two to achieve NMI, you lose the SURPRISE of the Taser. They now have a chance to rip the first probe out before NMI is achieved.
1. How are you going to magazine feed a probe that requires an electrical current to be passed to it? I agree with your #2 point and bonus point
Around 3:00 he said more capability and cartridges in the same size weapon, so similar to the Taser 7 size.
@@David-fp7yc I agree. It also doesn't look that much bigger than the Taser 7. Though, I obviously can't really see them in person for a good comparison
@@John-Smith02 I can tell from looking it uses the exact same rechargeable battery as the Taser 7. It would make a lot of sense of they allow police departments to reuse their newly acquired Taser 7 batteries and docks.
I’ve seen both up close and can confirm the T7 is VERY close in size to T10. It’s hard to tell the size difference unless you hold them next to each other.
I have three questions:
Can the Taser 10 be purchased by private security?
Will there be a civilian magazine fed taser in the works as well?
Will there be a trade in program for Taser 7 and older models?
There’s no reason for there to be different models. If the people cannot have the same model as law enforcement, there’s a problem.
@@SouthernGospelMusic Typically the civilian models are less restrictive than LE. 30 second activation instead of 5 second.
@@JasonSmith-ee7zq Exactly..... LE versions are way more restrictive.
Taser civilian models are meant for you to stop the threat and then YOU get away from the situation ..... LE models are based on the need for LEOs to SUBDUE the person.
the taser 10 seems like a very good long range taser, however it has no drive stun feature that I could find, so for now the X2 and X7 seem like a better option for police
Awesome to see. Now just waiting for the Axon Flex 3!
I have soooooo many questions. Is there not a drive stun ability?
Cool but no way anyone is taking a taser to a gun fight
Is this even available? I don’t see it on the website. I don’t see a release date either.
While they didnt state it, the sequential firing will be a game changer in struggles. Now instead of being forced to drive stun, you deliberately place a barb in two distant locations for full nmi. Though im not 100% sure thats true or supported by the new manual of arms.
The only question remains is will the officer on thw street be able to aim well enough under pressure?
Hopefully they fixed the safety lever problem thr Taser 7 has. Two broken safety levers in the past month which occurred during my daily test.
When is this one coming out ?
Armed Security Officer here, I can't even purchase a Taser 7 because Axon won't sell it to me, They only sell me the Taser 7qc... 😢
Try contacting Pro Force they are an authorized Axon dealer. Don’t even bother with the Taser 7 CQ.
Not sure about the shooting 1 probe at a time. All the suspects have to do is quickly pull out the first hit before the 2nd hit to avoid nmi. Everything else seems great.
I guess if they stop to remove probes that's buying officers time to apprehend, or it could make them compliant knowing that a second probe is moments away from making them go very stiff
This video over and over is basically arguing this taser would/should be used in place of a firearm. If someone is a deadly threat, lethal force should be used. not a taser of any kind, even if it had 50 probes. should it technically be very efficient in less lethal scenarios? yeah. But why does it keep talking about lowering gun related deaths like police are using their service pistols on people who aren't posing a deadly threat.
It’s the woke society that needs to change, they think police are the issue. I’m certain the girl with the dreads in this video is not helping. Police will continue to be expected to risk their lives needlessly in an attempt to use less lethal force when lethal force may be necessary. I’m sure this will come in handy but there will always be a need for lethal force and it should never be downgraded when needed. I get this is a great supplementary tool but that’s all it is.
New era indeed
Can be used for home defense
The Taser 10 doesn't have a civilian counterpart yet. Only the Taser 7.
When does this come out? Was thinking of getting the taser 7
Next month
Does this even have the ability to drive stun???
hopefully in 10-15 years (if not sooner, i'm being conservative here) we'll have the battery technology (more efficient, reliable, and compact) and propellent coupled with a reliable wireless signal to allow something like this to work Without the wires. But as it is now it's still very impressive and exciting.
They had the shotgun that shot out wireless probes that were huge. I’m not really sure what the issues were with it though that made them decide to discontinue it but I’ve said the same thing. I hate that these have thin delicate wires that can break if the person pulls on them or rolls around. It would be a game changer for the 10 to be wireless! Maybe soon like you said.
@@brightbkh07 Being that the shotgun xrep was made nearly 2 decades ago, it's possible that maybe in a decade or less we'll have a miniaturized version of it with more reliable and better micro batteries and chips to ensure they're more reliable and effective. But also able to fit a pistol or semi auto carbine or at the very least a revolver.
This is very revolutionary!!!
06:43. Yeah single officer should never draw a taser vs a knife.
I think it's a good idea, but not just make it available to law but also ccw carriers it could reduce those trigger happy people or those that are in a life situation would drop also the reason of a civilian carrying a fire arm instead of using deadly force cause he fears for his life he can stop the threat as well in a moments needed.
Why not just do wireless probes?
It would be expensive to make a wireless probe that can stun someone. If anything, the ammunition would be more expensive than the weapon.
Plus a wireless connection to a probe could potentially fail, which would consequently kill the perpetrator due to excessive electric damage, rather than the intended use of immobilising said perpetrator.
It’s easier to have a wire connection to the probe, which can be shut off quickly by the user, avoiding a potential death.
It should fire 2 initially then 1 thereafter.
The problem I have with this is how the training has gone in the last 20 years. Originally when the tazer was available there were very few areas that you were to avoid and even hitting them was better than shooting the person. Since then tazer has added larger avoid areas and the use of force level of tazer has been elevated much higher. They talk about how it could cause heart problems even though the initial research and marketing said the pulses were not able to effect the heart. I do not blame law enforcement or the courts for this but the inability to provide legal representation in these cases where they created bad case law. I can tell you that 99% of the screaming and agony that you hear on body cameras is usually A) after the taser was turned off and B) because the person hit was losing it that the police didn't allow them to just continue their rampage.
that’s great but it has to have a price tag just as good.
5k USD. Not too bad.
A person's life is worth a lot more than that.
Less people in hospital, less permanent injuries and deaths etc... the list goes on.
Why wont you make it available to civillians?
The WASR10 of a NEW AGE
Should change the tag from "less lethal" to "less than useless" or "more lethal, to the user."
I can’t handle everything that pours into my phone
Freaking awesome!
Gotta be very careful with your wording. It sounds like you're advocating using less lethal force in a deadly force situation.
Deadly force isn't just used because "it's effective" it's used to stop A DEADLY THREAT. If some one pulls a gun on you and you pull a taser, no matter which one, you're doing something very wrong.
Tasers are NOT 100% effective in all situations, even with 10 rounds.
That said....... It's nice to see that this solves a serious issue with past tasers, Spread. It's MUCH better that you can put out multiple barbs in non deadly force situations in order to control your own spread, making it more likely to be effective at various ranges. Up close it's almost useless since you have to rely on drive stunning, which doesn't create NMI.
Also have to think about stress factors when deploying since it's one barb at a time. It's not uncommon for officers to shoot way more rounds than they thought or hold the taser trigger for longer than they thought when in these situations.
I think this is a great step forward but just be careful how you market this or how you say things.
Man! Tasers are becoming like PlayStations? They keep getting better and better, but pricier and pricier! With the better technology also comes more training which is pretty great! 👍
Call it the Harpoon
The lifeguards of the lower end of the gene pool.
Next is flamable fluid in a glass bottle, 1000x effective at stunning people.
First off this sounds like you all are trying to eliminate the need for deadly force. Which a less than lethal option will never be able to do. Although Taser does fit a certain type of scenario you should never NEVER ever use a less than lethal option on a lethal threat.
Wattozz wireless stun gun
Bring a taser to a knife fight huh? No thanks, 9mm +p HP's are the correct answer.
Barbaric weapons that are far from safe.
Damn y'all stroke it slowly only to not give us a decent release.
You didn't show it in use
You didn't't mention dry stun
You didn't give a price point
Drive Stun
next one gone be tazer 11 LMFAO
Came here to say these are incredibly unreliable compared to the previous generations. Multiple shots in light clothing are ineffective even to the point of two different tasers having multiple shots on target with good probe spread. The running theory is it is because the significantly reduced power utilized that no longer generates the air gap from probe to skin through the clothing barrier but axon cant seem to figure out what it is. Buyer beware.
Too bad it doesn’t go through police body armor.
Как ты себе это представляешь?
I'm sorry but no matter how sophisticated these get IMO it doesn't mean shit to me. When the use of a taser is in the same level of force on the use of force "matrix" "or what ever your state calls it now" as the firearm I'm going to go to my gun over the taser every time. Why? because I'm better with it, I get to train with it more, I know it'll work everytime whereas the taser doesn't, and many more reasons. How bout we PUNISH the violent offenders instead of letting them out so we have to deal with them again and again instead of coming up with new ways to safely detain them while they're trying to KILL you??
Pretty cool, but I'm waiting for a taser like the one in that one TV Show APB. How come you can't design one like this one: th-cam.com/video/OuXR0F6ZQzc/w-d-xo.html
I heard the Russian guy who designed that one works for Axon now.
Basically after all the blah blah blah the underlying message is we want to make money
not even showing the price = civilians won't be able to afford. also forget the rechargeable batteries, use batteries anyone can get like CR123's. that being said you solved one of my main complaints about these tasers and it's ammo. Granted I can't imagine how much those cartridges will cost in comparison to regular ammo and a firearm.
@John Stevenson I get that, but the taser pulse is trash, I wouldn't trust my life to it
I’m sure you’ve heard the song “IRONY” - well, she’ll probably have to make “PLASTICKY” or something, now!!! 🫶🫰🤭🤪