@carlo.4400 From what I know, the watch came from the original owner. I also found online, "Not listed on the chart is the 93150 / 501B combo which was in fact issued with early year models of 16570, 16700, and 16710." So If I had to guess, it is a Sub Bracelet but it came that way from factory.
My 1996 16570 came also from the original owner with the sub-bracelet. someone on ebay payed 1000€ for the vintage sub-bracelet so i was able to by a brandnew ex2 bracelet for 1100€.
Explorer 2 is not exactly a pretty watch, but definitely not the ugliest. Yachmaster 2 and the modern Air King are much stronger contender for ugliest.
Mine doesn’t have a diver’s extension. I think a Sub bracelet somehow ended up on your watch.
@carlo.4400 From what I know, the watch came from the original owner.
I also found online, "Not listed on the chart is the 93150 / 501B combo which was in fact issued with early year models of 16570, 16700, and 16710."
So If I had to guess, it is a Sub Bracelet but it came that way from factory.
same for mine as well, 78790a 2005/2006 d serial SEL
My 1996 16570 came also from the original owner with the sub-bracelet. someone on ebay payed 1000€ for the vintage sub-bracelet so i was able to by a brandnew ex2 bracelet for 1100€.
Thanks, good to know it wasn't just me. Also killer deal! I'm sure you enjoy it :)
best low key rolex.
I agree, this and the oyster perpetual fly under the radar.
In my opinion the ugliest rolex watch.
Explorer 2 is not exactly a pretty watch, but definitely not the ugliest. Yachmaster 2 and the modern Air King are much stronger contender for ugliest.
@@PPN462 Agreed. For me, The Air King is an acquired taste. But the Yatchmaster2 is butt ugly.