Marshall Middleton VS JBL Xtreme 3 | Is really that good? 😁
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 10 ก.พ. 2023
- - If you want to support me, subscribe my channel!
My recommendations
Tribit stormbox micro 2 - $60 - 8/10 -
A really great sounding speaker at an affordable price and also very compact. Perfect for biking or the beach.
In addition, an application with an equalizer and a battery indicator is available
Soundcore Motion 300 - $80 - 7/10 -
Great sounding speaker with a nice customizable EQ and an adaptive EQ that changes the sound depending on position. But it can distort sometimes
JBL Partybox Encore - $300-330 - 9/10 -
A good loudspeaker with deep bass for a party. It has an equalizer app and has bass boost options that make it even better
will enhance the party. Additionally, there are 2 microphones in the box (USA) and 1 microphone in the EU. I even prefer the encore to the boombox 3. New models have now better battery. - If you want to support me, subscribe my channel!
reviewsdominik@gmail.com - วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี
![[Full Episode] MasterChef Junior Thailand มาสเตอร์เชฟ จูเนียร์ ประเทศไทย Season 3 Episode 4](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/e7Oqqo90x_w/mqdefault.jpg)
Finally, someone shows proof the marshall plays deeper than the larger extreme 3.
And I still saw you're comment from earlier it does play deeper but not by much it's just louder between 45Hz to 40hz the rest of the bass is rolled off afterwards which is fine. But the Xtreme 3 takes the win in sound quality
@The Ascended Tech Ninja I will say this. The middleton doesn't sound good in some situations. If I have it sitting on my bed it's like it has no bass. Its like the bed absorbs the bass. But if I take it to work which is In a big pharmacy. I have it placed in the corner of the pharmacy on a big stainless steel table and the bass is really impressive. The deep rumble is surprising. One employee ordered one when they heard it walking by. I think the unique driver layout and 360 audio hinder it in some areas but if you find the right location it really does sound impressive.
the marshall still loses. the bass is fake, no kick or attack...and missing treble. on higher levels the marshall sounds real shitty. Better get a teufel rockster cross for the price..it destroys it. or a jbl xtreme 3...
@M. # is your name Oluv? How about you have your own opinion and not someone else's. I knew he wouldn't like it. I agree it's not good over 60% volume and it's lacking some kick but imo the deep rumble it has is quite impressive. In my cornor at my work the bass gets this enhancement from the walls and it sounds much bigger than it is
@@alexlittig7927 seems like you have not your own opinion and only say no to what others say. Get your own opinion first, then come back. I made my own conclusion as you can read.
And if you only like fske bass up to 60% okay - that doesn't mean it is a good speaker. It is still shit for the price and overall sound is bad. If i want rumbling bass, i bux a subwoofer 😁 and as i said, the teufel rockster cross destroys this easily while beeing cheaper also
A bit much upper bass and slight boxiness which can give additional warmth, but the deep bass is really impressive, especially if you have advantage of room mode below 50hz. But mids and treble sound more even and hifi on the JBL.
Both get the same bass low limit, but as xtreme ceases to sound notes it ceases to excursion too, so the bass is more genuine and no just vibrations, because the excursion without sound (heard in marshall) is noticeable
What a comparison 🔥 gives a genuine idea of the sound difference and capabilities. 👌🏼👌🏼
🙏
Quick question: I’ve heard that the Xtreme 3 performs better when its plugged in. How significant is the performance upgrade in % vs non plugged in? And does it also increase the bass performance or just the loudness. Thanks :)
@@shaishavgandhi It increase just loudness, i think its like 1,5 db boost or just 1db
@@DominikReviews oh! that’s negligible. Thanks for quick response:)
If both the speakers were similarly priced(lets say around the price of discounted Xtreme 3, you’re also getting Middleton) which one would you pick?
@@shaishavgandhi Xtreme 3, i have both still at home and for highs levels xtreme is way better, middleton at maximum completely compress volume
Wow Marshal too peaceful while jbl kind of distorting
Great comparasion. Both of these are great quality sound. Nice deep bass. It's very hard for me to decide... Which sounded of the best sound quality to u?
no one can for me sound good. I like more xtreme 2 for the sound
In person. That 360 sound from Marshall kills
@@gzoe4real4ever have you compared them in person?
Did you use the JBL Portable app before using the speaker?
Yeah
Please do a comparison with the Charge 5
Maybe i will do
Dominik, can you give me the name of the songs? Thanks🤯
boom boom fuck fuck fuck police ✖✖✖
Thanks a lot for this comparison. I watched Floss video and others including yours and I wasn't convinced at all the Marshal was anything to pay attention to. Well this video prove me wrong but the Xtreme 3 wins in this comparison from what I heard. It has proper and more defined stereo separation and the highs doint get jumbled which was more noticeable at max volume compared to the Marshall. Although the Marshall has deeper bass but not by much and has more mids. Since each channel is on a side playing in stereo it fills up a room better if it's in the middle but most of the times people have their speakers closer to a wall so I couldn't really see myself using the Marshall since one woofer is mostly blocked off. Keep up the good work 👍
if you listen to deep instruments in music, a marshall with a much larger sound space, something like 360, will be better played. Xtreme 3 is harsh in the treble at high volume. At maximum, I have the feeling that none of them are pleasant to listen to.
But jazz, rock, metal, classical > Marshall Middleton
Disco, EDM, Rap > Xtreme 3
@@DominikReviews The Xtreme 3's highs are really too harsh and subpar compared to its competitors (even the "non-brand" Tribits / Ankers)
The Charge 5 and Boombox 3 are better products in their class.
@@redinho1994 boombox 3 is harsh also
Sounds like the Marshall reaches way lower. How would you describe the comparison as you ve heard both in pearson
Both reaches the same note (49hz) but marshall keeps excursioning producing just vibrations below that frequency
JBL gaves much clean sound, whithout noises in middle. Thanks.
No problem!
xtreme 3 still better overall - especially in treble and the bass of the jxtreme 3 has more kick. marshall too soft, but its close. if you want a real winner, buy teufel rockster cross - it destroys them both
Buy motion boom plus it destroy stinky rockster Cross
@@DominikReviews no it doesnt and it is also heavier and bigger ..it is more jbl bombox competitor, althought the boombox destroys it.
@@mxz2024 motion boom plus is only a bit bigger and it is the same weight
People that think xtreme 3 have better treble is simply suffering from hearing loss or little bit deaf.
I even need to turn down the PB310 treble to reduce the unnatural harsness.
@@ggg-en6hq people who think there is good treble on the marshall are deaf yes. Because there is no treble at all
Here the Marshall is the winner... JBL sound stage narrow n Marshall sound more wider n smooth
But marshall is so muffled and distorted
At max volume Marshal cant keep up
Marshall Sharp sound
yep
Marshall mid range frequency is awesome
Hmm
🤣🤣🤣
Nice video. Very helpful… for this kind of music and hearing right in front of the speaker, the jbl is the winner, plus with nicer deeper bass. Rock songs the results could be different.
marshall middleton goes deeper in hertz
@@DominikReviews yeah, I got it on the video, but Jbl sounds deeper because it has less upper bass, giving the impression of playing deeper on the song.
@Miguel Kiesse JBL has way more upper bass than Middleton I can assure you that
@@alexlittig7927 you mean the xtreme has more mid bass, because, specially at maximum, the xtreme has very little upper bass, that’s why it sounds thin. Now, if the Middleton has less upper bass, that’s not good, it has not a balance bass.
@Miguel Kiesse it's got Ok mid bass but upper bass slam is just average. It's tuning is mostly for that deep rumble instead of slamming bass where you feel the kicks in your chest. Motion boom plus has tons of upper bass slam I can physically feel it thump. But it can't do deep bass. Same with boombox 3. The boombox 3 has a lot of rumble between 40 and 65hz than it falls off a cliff. Not much slam.
While that is a downside of the middleton I don't care. I much prefer the deep rumble to the hard-hitting mid to upper bass. The only speaker I have that can effectively do all bass well is my devialet Phantom 2. Insanely deep sub bass down to 18hz. Then on a track with slamming bass, it will thump your chest when you crank the volume up part 80%
Marshall sucks! JBL still the best
Is the Middleton portable or to big?
Is ok but 2kg so is actually heavy
@Dominik looking to buy one for traveling but not sure if it's going to be to big for the baggage lol 😆
@@drss3 if you want nice travel speaker buy charge 5 or motion boom