"In Limitless, if he's so brillaint and rich, why doesn't he just pay off the bookie on time?" That's the point. Having a high IQ doesn't magically mean you make nothing but good decisions. You still have to actually focus on *what* you're doing. And, it doesn't get rid of your core flaws. Being smart doesn't make you _wise._ An arrogant smart person is just a more dangerous arrogant person.
I've seen the Toy Story thing before. The best explanation I've seen is that Buzz is a highly trained Space Ranger. An individual specifically trained to survive in alien environments. When a giant walks in and all the other native lifeforms, who, in his extremely brief interaction with them, seem to be friendly, suddenly drop and pretend to be dead (or whatever it is that they're doing), it would be natural to assume that the giant is a threat and "playing dead" is a defense against the dangerous giant. With absolutely no other information to base a decision on... Well, as they say, when in Rome...
I remember reading a article years where this plothole was adressed. Apparently when making Toy Story they were trying to think of an explanation for it but eventually they were like "you know what? Who cares?".
Not sure this is a plot hole versus an unresolved plot thread but in "The Simpsons Movie", the pond is contaminated beyond the point of no return and that's why the dome is lowered over Springfield. After the dome is lifted, the pond is never addressed again despite it still being contaminated beyond the point of no return.
Aladdin (the 1992 animated film). From the moment that Aladdin meets the Genie and the Genie explains how the three wishes work, the ENTIRE PLOT FALLS APART. As Jafar proves later in the movie, Person B can INTERRUPT Person A's wishes by rubbing the lamp and commencing his/her own set of wishes. This means that Aladdin's "dilemma" of how to use his last wish is a non-issue. He can simply ask Jasmine or the Sultan to rub the lamp to gain enough wishes for Aladdin to remain a prince and to set the genie free. What's WORSE is that the Genie could have TOLD Aladdin all of this upon finding out that Aladdin was planning to break his promise. Not one character in the movie notices this giant Get Out of Jail Free card and it drives me crazy.
This is just a more convoluted version of the classic “I wish for infinite wishes” loophole that everyone always thought of in every wish-related stories. Every fairytale involving wishes always “conveniently” forget this loophole so the story can happen
The thing is, Aladdin's choice is more about his own character and wishing to be honest. Starting his relationship with jasmine S the real him and recognising genies need. While he can loophole another wish, if he can loophole a solution anyway and genie doesn't want to be bound any more, why not go without the wish?
To be fair, in the Genie's intro scene, he says he's been imprisoned in the Cave of Wonders for 10,000 years (assuming he wasn't just exaggerating) and he only mentions having had one previous master (who was apparently considerably taller than Aladdin), so the idea of having a second party 'take over' to restart the wishing total may have never come up before Jafar tried it. That or the Genie didn't mention it because he obviously doesn't want folk abusing it, especially not with the promise of being freed from servitude on the line.
5:35 This exact joke is referenced in Steven Spielberg's version. As Tony sings, two other Marias (a little girl and an old woman) open their windows to hear him.
And I think I tuned into a Sponge Bob episode for a few stray seconds one day when they showed an underwater hallway/room with torches on the walls. Flickering.
5:28 I never thought of that before... and yet it's so simple, like there are multiple Sarah Connors, obviously there should be even more just Sarahs. And then _Maria_ is a particularly popular name amongst the Spanish population, so... yeah. It reminds me of a Simpsons joke where two zombies are arguing over who's grave it is: *John2:* "Excuse me, _I'm_ John Smith." *John1:* "John Smith 1882?" *John2:* "My mistake."
In Percy Jackson: Sea of Monsters, the good guys were on a quest to find the Golden Fleece, which has the power to heal anything, even resurrect the dead. At the end, they got the Fleece, but the bad guys held one of their friends hostage to force them to hand it over….and Percy stupidly did! Why should the heroes care about a hostage situation when they have a fleece who can HEAL ANYTHING?
1:45 They tried to explain it once by claiming that Barry lets the villains get punches in "because he feels sorry for them," but really just about everything the Flash does is BS. I'm not entirely sure it's a plot hole, per se... he could just be the stupidest man in the world, and he constantly forgets he can move faster than light? Like 98.6% of the time, he just... forgets that's a thing he can do? That's the only rational explanation.
back to the future 3, youre telling me Doc Brown can make an ice machine in the old west, make chemical logs that ignite when they want as hot as they want, but was stupid enough to put moonshine in the DeLorean instead of making gas?
11:25 Because if they used the solutions that legitimately worked, the tension/drama would lessen significantly. Zombies would rarely pose a threat after that.
7:00 he was going to maim and or kill Peter to get Spider-Man's attention. Because he assumed Peter would have been someone close to Spidey and therefore make him more likely to go after him than hurting say a rando civilian.
I could accept that if he had done something else. But throwing a car at somebody who, presumably, can't see you or the car, doesn't really have a high probability of JUST hurting them.
1. 'The Santa Clause' says by 'accident or design'. Design means Scott Calvin didn't have to do the job. 2. At no time did 'My Cousin Vinny' tell Lisa that his new fake name was Callo, so her last minute save makes no sense.
The Liar Liar one, I'm no lawyer, but I think it was that they were together for so long, it became a common law marriage and she was still entitled to half the assets, just the prenup was void. Also the Twilight blood thing, I read somewhere that Meyer said period blood was "dead blood" and didn't mean anything to vampires. But still, paper cuts, nose bleeds, etc.
Iron-man 3; Tony falls asleep while flying and crash lands, his house was blown up, and now his armor is broken because of the landing. He spends most of the film with a broken suit and can't get back to his lab to fix it. Then at the end of the movie he has JARVIS pilot a literal army of suits to his location he was hiding under his house. Are you telling me he didn't have any way to call JARVIS, an AI that is built into his house, armor, and company, before the finale of the film?
9:53 Well, the Arnold at the observatory is from the first movie, that timeline has happened at least once and so the send back has to happen, even if Skynet no longer exists (existed, whatever time travel stuff) If the movie wants to explain this they can just say that the original jump was calculated without the temporal aftereffects of the other jumps that happen in later movies or somth like that. God I miss when Terminator movies was about a calculating robot hunting down some heros and not trying to humanize them. It worked ONCE in Terminator 2 because it made sense lore wise and perfectly fit the plot and environment, basically comparing the learned humanity of the t-800 to what it was meant to be/do. (I'm a Terminator fan lol)
At the beginning of Toy Story, Buzz Lightyear thinks he's real. So how does he know to assume the "I'm a toy" pose and stay silent around humans when he thinks he's an actual space ranger? EDIT: I wrote this just by seeing the title, before watching the video.
@@EndlessSummer888 oh yeah, you are right. Also, do all toys go through the self discovery of being a toy? Do they all think they are the character they are?
@@cubah1 That's an interesting question. Combined information from the other movies might put that into perspective. I guess it depends on which toy they are. I can't really imagine who may have a tough time besides maybe Rex, realizing he's just a toy and not a fearsome dinosaur.
In the Flash film, time travel, going back in time causes you to be on a different timeline with a different history which happens to share one event with your current timeline... Unless you are Dark Flash who went back in time to ensure present Barry would be punched to the year 2013 instead of going back to 2023, ensuring a 2013 Barry would be set on the path to become Dark Flash.
Like Patrick Star or SpongeBob SquarePants said: “wait, how can we light a fire if we’re underwater?” Also, how is it possible for fish to get a tan? It doesn’t make sense
6:00 Yeah, all shrinkage movies are pretty much logical garbage. I never bothered to see _Fantastic Voyage,_ not when it came out and not since. _The Incredible Shrinking Man_ was super ridiculous and one of the 50's movies that I truly hated.
For the Superman/Lex Luthor thing. To further the point, why does Luthor need to worry about the absurd real estate plan at all? He had already conned the old lady out of, what appeared to be, a disgustingly gigantic fortune.
Because he's lex. It's not about any material gain or practical worth, it's about pride and proving himself the greatest. In his mind he has to sell the "one thing they don't make anymore" and get one over on superman while doing it, because nobody else can.
The spiderman one with doc Ock trying to kill Peter but needing his help could be explained by maybe doc Ock thinking spiderman is close enough to peter that if Ock attacks him Spiderman will show up, but also that is a massive gamble and I shouldnt have to like think around the universe to get an answer you know? But yeah that's my theory on that and to his credit spiderman does show up after he throws the car
Star Wars Episode I gets a retroactive plot hole thanks to Episode III: if Jedi can be wiped out en masse by trained soldiers with blasters, why didn't Padme just order her troops to open fire on Darth Maul when they open the hangar doors and see him standing there? Even if he was fast enough to deflect the hail of blaster bolts, Qui-Gonn and Obi-Wan could've used it as a distraction to go in and strike him down.
That is not a plot hole. As for the inconsistency. Clones are born and trained for war. They have heavy armour and blasters. But the main thing is that the clones shot most of the jedi in the back. Its a surprise betrayal that gets them more than blaster fire.
Why doesn’t Frodo wear the Mithril shirt the rest of the time? He’s not wearing it, gets stuck by the spider *in the gut where that shirt should be* then the orcs knick it from his stuff
Not a plothole, more a plotplug. Once upon a time in the West is the most blatant offender: there's a whole movie going on where you see the what and how, but not the why. Then Harmonica walks in, says he's seen some documents which we never knew about and he was not seen searching for, and goes on to explain the why at length. That's the whole plot, but it's just told to us like a footnote. Oh, and he wasn't literate, most likely. There are many movies like that.
Spider-Man no way home only happens because Tom Holland Spider-Man apparently can’t have a 5 minute conversation with his aunt and his friends to tell them he’s Spider-Man.
Alternately, once Dr. Strange explains how the spell to make everyone forget he's Spider-Man works, Peter can't take 5 minutes to think of who he wants to be exempt from the spell and write them down so Dr. Strange only has to do it one more time.
In post-apocalyptic movies and TV shows, why does everyone have pearly white teeth?... They can barely find basic everyday needs and forgo bathing & personal hygiene for months at a time, yet everyone has a perfect set of chompers 😁. No one has tooth problems or decay or missing teeth? Watch Walking Dead, aside from the zombies, everyone else has a lifetime supply of Crest Whitening Strips.
11:51 The females don't die after the spawning, just the males after they pass on their genes. You never see Zoidberg's dad because of this, just his mom.
Early episode of the original Star Trek, "The Enemy Within". The Enterprise's transporter malfunctions and creates and evil duplicate of Captain Kirk, meaning they can't beam up the away team on the freezing planet they're orbiting until it's fixed or they could end up with evil copies of them, too. Why didn't they just send down a shuttlecraft to get them?
Star Wars VI: The Empire Strikes Back. Luke kills the Yeti-like snow creature then runs out into freezing weather. Why not stay in the cave? Even if there were other creatures in there, he had his light sabre. He would have been infinitely safer staying inside and killing monsters as needed.
In Star Wars the original trilogy there are many many plot holes making it actually garbage. So in Episode 4 Vader locks onto Luke and fires his lasers. Vader Locks on and fires but nothing happens. Also Luke destroys the Death Star flying better than super highly trained pilots using an X wing which he has never been off the planet he grew up on. Luke says he use to fly his sky hopper but let me put this into a comparison that people can understand which is a sky hopper is like a dirt bike while an X Wing is like an F 22 raptor. The difference between them is so bat shit insane that Luke claiming the idea of making that shot being easy is brain dead stupid especially when you realize Luke was blatantly talking out his ass because he has never done shit that was even fucking close to what he did. Hell then in The Empire Strikes Back Vader tells Luke "From the last time we met Obi Wan taught you well." The horrible brad grammar aside that line gets even stupider when you realize Vader killed Obi Wan less than 6 months earlier. The plot holes are so fucking bad the original trilogy is absolute garbage. As a kid yea I rewatched it a few times many because I only had like 3 VHS at the time and they were Who Framed Roger Rabbit, the 1989 Batman movie and Star Wars and then added more to my collection over a large period of time meaning nearly 20 years it took me to get my collection of VHS to over 1500 tapes.
The Death Star trench run is not a plot hole just because you find it unbelievable. Han shoots the tie fighter next to Vader, distracting him, which throws off his aim. I know that the edit of the movie shows Vader locking on, but the lasers don't hit Luke. Not sure what to tell you. Star Wars is a classic example of the hero's journey. Just look it up. Main character is living their life, they're down on their luck, then there is a call to adventure where the main character leaves all that they know and are thrust into the unknown. There are other characters, challenges, mentors, the main character grows and changes, overcomes obstacles, there might even be supernatural elements (the force) to the story, and they eventually win in the end and return home (or to the known). Luke was tapping into the Force with the aid of Obi-Wan to destroy the Death Star. Again, just because you don't find it believable that Luke can pilot an x-wing, does not make it a plot hole. "From the last time we met Obi Wan taught you well" is not a line in Empire, so I have no clue what you're going on about.
@@garrethboland Yeah... sometimes people just invent reason to be mad. Like, if you don't like the movie, fine. There are _real_ criticisms you could make instead of pretending that implausibility equals plot hole.
I think what you’re missing is that the force and the fact that his dad was the greatest pilot ever are why he can fly so well. Also anything he says about Obi-Wan is clearly a taunt. “How’s your dead mentor” is a little on the nose.
thing about the movies that involve shrinking people , i cant shake the thought that people would die due human bodies being unable to process the now enlarged air/oxygen in comparison to normal ..... perhaps im way off , but seems like you'd suffocate or something
At SOME point, this would be an issue. But probably only after the oxygen molecules became a significant percentage of the individuals size. But that size, is probably somewhere near their already self-imposed "no subatomic" limit anyway.
This is a thing in Star Trek: Deep Space Nine. There is an episode where three of the crew members are in a shuttlecraft and fly into some space radiation nonsense, and exiting it makes them shrink. When they get back to the station they find it has been taken over, so they have to sneak around the station in order to help the normal-sized crew members. They stay inside the shuttlecraft the whole time, except for when they need to sabotage a system in order to help stop the invasion. They need to get inside the system, so they have to beam in some air that was also shrunk with them in order to breathe inside the electrical component that they're sabotaging, and they have to work really quickly because there's a limited supply. After they stop the invasion, the normal-sized crew members help them get back to normal size using the space radiation nonsense.
![ประสบการณ์ จ้าง Developer ที่ผมจะไม่มีวันลืม [ภาค1]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/bzivN4KDg-k/mqdefault.jpg)
"In Limitless, if he's so brillaint and rich, why doesn't he just pay off the bookie on time?"
That's the point. Having a high IQ doesn't magically mean you make nothing but good decisions. You still have to actually focus on *what* you're doing. And, it doesn't get rid of your core flaws. Being smart doesn't make you _wise._ An arrogant smart person is just a more dangerous arrogant person.
I've seen the Toy Story thing before. The best explanation I've seen is that Buzz is a highly trained Space Ranger. An individual specifically trained to survive in alien environments. When a giant walks in and all the other native lifeforms, who, in his extremely brief interaction with them, seem to be friendly, suddenly drop and pretend to be dead (or whatever it is that they're doing), it would be natural to assume that the giant is a threat and "playing dead" is a defense against the dangerous giant. With absolutely no other information to base a decision on... Well, as they say, when in Rome...
I remember reading a article years where this plothole was adressed. Apparently when making Toy Story they were trying to think of an explanation for it but eventually they were like "you know what? Who cares?".
Not sure this is a plot hole versus an unresolved plot thread but in "The Simpsons Movie", the pond is contaminated beyond the point of no return and that's why the dome is lowered over Springfield. After the dome is lifted, the pond is never addressed again despite it still being contaminated beyond the point of no return.
Aladdin (the 1992 animated film). From the moment that Aladdin meets the Genie and the Genie explains how the three wishes work, the ENTIRE PLOT FALLS APART. As Jafar proves later in the movie, Person B can INTERRUPT Person A's wishes by rubbing the lamp and commencing his/her own set of wishes. This means that Aladdin's "dilemma" of how to use his last wish is a non-issue. He can simply ask Jasmine or the Sultan to rub the lamp to gain enough wishes for Aladdin to remain a prince and to set the genie free. What's WORSE is that the Genie could have TOLD Aladdin all of this upon finding out that Aladdin was planning to break his promise. Not one character in the movie notices this giant Get Out of Jail Free card and it drives me crazy.
This is just a more convoluted version of the classic “I wish for infinite wishes” loophole that everyone always thought of in every wish-related stories. Every fairytale involving wishes always “conveniently” forget this loophole so the story can happen
The thing is, Aladdin's choice is more about his own character and wishing to be honest. Starting his relationship with jasmine S the real him and recognising genies need. While he can loophole another wish, if he can loophole a solution anyway and genie doesn't want to be bound any more, why not go without the wish?
To be fair, in the Genie's intro scene, he says he's been imprisoned in the Cave of Wonders for 10,000 years (assuming he wasn't just exaggerating) and he only mentions having had one previous master (who was apparently considerably taller than Aladdin), so the idea of having a second party 'take over' to restart the wishing total may have never come up before Jafar tried it. That or the Genie didn't mention it because he obviously doesn't want folk abusing it, especially not with the promise of being freed from servitude on the line.
5:35
This exact joke is referenced in Steven Spielberg's version. As Tony sings, two other Marias (a little girl and an old woman) open their windows to hear him.
how does Mr krabs listen to music with headphones if he doesn't have ears
And I think I tuned into a Sponge Bob episode for a few stray seconds one day when they showed an underwater hallway/room with torches on the walls. Flickering.
Vibrations through the shell. But in all seriousness there’s no logic to hearing like we do underwater.
5:28 I never thought of that before... and yet it's so simple, like there are multiple Sarah Connors, obviously there should be even more just Sarahs. And then _Maria_ is a particularly popular name amongst the Spanish population, so... yeah. It reminds me of a Simpsons joke where two zombies are arguing over who's grave it is:
*John2:* "Excuse me, _I'm_ John Smith."
*John1:* "John Smith 1882?"
*John2:* "My mistake."
In Percy Jackson: Sea of Monsters, the good guys were on a quest to find the Golden Fleece, which has the power to heal anything, even resurrect the dead. At the end, they got the Fleece, but the bad guys held one of their friends hostage to force them to hand it over….and Percy stupidly did!
Why should the heroes care about a hostage situation when they have a fleece who can HEAL ANYTHING?
Re: periods in Forks, I assume menstrual blood is too full of Other Stuff to be palatable to vampires?
1:45 They tried to explain it once by claiming that Barry lets the villains get punches in "because he feels sorry for them," but really just about everything the Flash does is BS. I'm not entirely sure it's a plot hole, per se... he could just be the stupidest man in the world, and he constantly forgets he can move faster than light? Like 98.6% of the time, he just... forgets that's a thing he can do? That's the only rational explanation.
back to the future 3, youre telling me Doc Brown can make an ice machine in the old west, make chemical logs that ignite when they want as hot as they want, but was stupid enough to put moonshine in the DeLorean instead of making gas?
11:25 Because if they used the solutions that legitimately worked, the tension/drama would lessen significantly. Zombies would rarely pose a threat after that.
7:00 he was going to maim and or kill Peter to get Spider-Man's attention. Because he assumed Peter would have been someone close to Spidey and therefore make him more likely to go after him than hurting say a rando civilian.
I could accept that if he had done something else. But throwing a car at somebody who, presumably, can't see you or the car, doesn't really have a high probability of JUST hurting them.
All of the Star Wars prequels are a plot hole
1. 'The Santa Clause' says by 'accident or design'. Design means Scott Calvin didn't have to do the job. 2. At no time did 'My Cousin Vinny' tell Lisa that his new fake name was Callo, so her last minute save makes no sense.
Damn I forgot about the whole carfox switch up
14:30 That is an excellent explanation of Toy Story's issue with Buzz.
Regarding the walking dead, fear the walking dead actually did this. Used zombies to defend from zombies
The Liar Liar one, I'm no lawyer, but I think it was that they were together for so long, it became a common law marriage and she was still entitled to half the assets, just the prenup was void.
Also the Twilight blood thing, I read somewhere that Meyer said period blood was "dead blood" and didn't mean anything to vampires. But still, paper cuts, nose bleeds, etc.
Iron-man 3; Tony falls asleep while flying and crash lands, his house was blown up, and now his armor is broken because of the landing. He spends most of the film with a broken suit and can't get back to his lab to fix it. Then at the end of the movie he has JARVIS pilot a literal army of suits to his location he was hiding under his house. Are you telling me he didn't have any way to call JARVIS, an AI that is built into his house, armor, and company, before the finale of the film?
9:53 Well, the Arnold at the observatory is from the first movie, that timeline has happened at least once and so the send back has to happen, even if Skynet no longer exists (existed, whatever time travel stuff)
If the movie wants to explain this they can just say that the original jump was calculated without the temporal aftereffects of the other jumps that happen in later movies or somth like that.
God I miss when Terminator movies was about a calculating robot hunting down some heros and not trying to humanize them. It worked ONCE in Terminator 2 because it made sense lore wise and perfectly fit the plot and environment, basically comparing the learned humanity of the t-800 to what it was meant to be/do.
(I'm a Terminator fan lol)
At the beginning of Toy Story, Buzz Lightyear thinks he's real. So how does he know to assume the "I'm a toy" pose and stay silent around humans when he thinks he's an actual space ranger?
EDIT: I wrote this just by seeing the title, before watching the video.
Either it’s a reflex toys cannot control? Like how the gargoyles turn into stone in sunlight and it doesn’t matter what they are doing
@@cubah1 Like the video said, it's not reflexive because they came alive in front of Sid. So it is a genuine plot hole.
@@EndlessSummer888 oh yeah, you are right. Also, do all toys go through the self discovery of being a toy? Do they all think they are the character they are?
@@cubah1 That's an interesting question. Combined information from the other movies might put that into perspective. I guess it depends on which toy they are. I can't really imagine who may have a tough time besides maybe Rex, realizing he's just a toy and not a fearsome dinosaur.
In the Flash film, time travel, going back in time causes you to be on a different timeline with a different history which happens to share one event with your current timeline...
Unless you are Dark Flash who went back in time to ensure present Barry would be punched to the year 2013 instead of going back to 2023, ensuring a 2013 Barry would be set on the path to become Dark Flash.
Like Patrick Star or SpongeBob SquarePants said: “wait, how can we light a fire if we’re underwater?” Also, how is it possible for fish to get a tan? It doesn’t make sense
6:00 Yeah, all shrinkage movies are pretty much logical garbage. I never bothered to see _Fantastic Voyage,_ not when it came out and not since. _The Incredible Shrinking Man_ was super ridiculous and one of the 50's movies that I truly hated.
The entirety of “damsel”, like a fire-breathing dragon that nearly dies from its own fire…
For the Superman/Lex Luthor thing. To further the point, why does Luthor need to worry about the absurd real estate plan at all? He had already conned the old lady out of, what appeared to be, a disgustingly gigantic fortune.
Because he's lex. It's not about any material gain or practical worth, it's about pride and proving himself the greatest. In his mind he has to sell the "one thing they don't make anymore" and get one over on superman while doing it, because nobody else can.
For the 10:40 Hannah Montana issue, he presents himself as Hannah Montana’s manager, not her father.
The spiderman one with doc Ock trying to kill Peter but needing his help could be explained by maybe doc Ock thinking spiderman is close enough to peter that if Ock attacks him Spiderman will show up, but also that is a massive gamble and I shouldnt have to like think around the universe to get an answer you know? But yeah that's my theory on that and to his credit spiderman does show up after he throws the car
6:55 Caffeine from the Coca-Cola plant speeds up evolution. That was from FUTURAMA.
Star Wars Episode I gets a retroactive plot hole thanks to Episode III: if Jedi can be wiped out en masse by trained soldiers with blasters, why didn't Padme just order her troops to open fire on Darth Maul when they open the hangar doors and see him standing there? Even if he was fast enough to deflect the hail of blaster bolts, Qui-Gonn and Obi-Wan could've used it as a distraction to go in and strike him down.
That is not a plot hole.
As for the inconsistency. Clones are born and trained for war. They have heavy armour and blasters. But the main thing is that the clones shot most of the jedi in the back. Its a surprise betrayal that gets them more than blaster fire.
Why doesn’t Frodo wear the Mithril shirt the rest of the time? He’s not wearing it, gets stuck by the spider *in the gut where that shirt should be* then the orcs knick it from his stuff
Not a plothole, more a plotplug. Once upon a time in the West is the most blatant offender: there's a whole movie going on where you see the what and how, but not the why. Then Harmonica walks in, says he's seen some documents which we never knew about and he was not seen searching for, and goes on to explain the why at length. That's the whole plot, but it's just told to us like a footnote.
Oh, and he wasn't literate, most likely.
There are many movies like that.
Spider-Man no way home only happens because Tom Holland Spider-Man apparently can’t have a 5 minute conversation with his aunt and his friends to tell them he’s Spider-Man.
Alternately, once Dr. Strange explains how the spell to make everyone forget he's Spider-Man works, Peter can't take 5 minutes to think of who he wants to be exempt from the spell and write them down so Dr. Strange only has to do it one more time.
In post-apocalyptic movies and TV shows, why does everyone have pearly white teeth?... They can barely find basic everyday needs and forgo bathing & personal hygiene for months at a time, yet everyone has a perfect set of chompers 😁. No one has tooth problems or decay or missing teeth? Watch Walking Dead, aside from the zombies, everyone else has a lifetime supply of Crest Whitening Strips.
It's almost as if a lot of films are poorly written with little world building behind the script!
Avgn thumbnail
11:51 The females don't die after the spawning, just the males after they pass on their genes.
You never see Zoidberg's dad because of this, just his mom.
So his uncle's a virgin then
your plot hole 😅
brain
Early episode of the original Star Trek, "The Enemy Within". The Enterprise's transporter malfunctions and creates and evil duplicate of Captain Kirk, meaning they can't beam up the away team on the freezing planet they're orbiting until it's fixed or they could end up with evil copies of them, too. Why didn't they just send down a shuttlecraft to get them?
Star Wars VI: The Empire Strikes Back. Luke kills the Yeti-like snow creature then runs out into freezing weather. Why not stay in the cave? Even if there were other creatures in there, he had his light sabre. He would have been infinitely safer staying inside and killing monsters as needed.
In Star Wars the original trilogy there are many many plot holes making it actually garbage. So in Episode 4 Vader locks onto Luke and fires his lasers. Vader Locks on and fires but nothing happens. Also Luke destroys the Death Star flying better than super highly trained pilots using an X wing which he has never been off the planet he grew up on. Luke says he use to fly his sky hopper but let me put this into a comparison that people can understand which is a sky hopper is like a dirt bike while an X Wing is like an F 22 raptor. The difference between them is so bat shit insane that Luke claiming the idea of making that shot being easy is brain dead stupid especially when you realize Luke was blatantly talking out his ass because he has never done shit that was even fucking close to what he did. Hell then in The Empire Strikes Back Vader tells Luke "From the last time we met Obi Wan taught you well." The horrible brad grammar aside that line gets even stupider when you realize Vader killed Obi Wan less than 6 months earlier. The plot holes are so fucking bad the original trilogy is absolute garbage. As a kid yea I rewatched it a few times many because I only had like 3 VHS at the time and they were Who Framed Roger Rabbit, the 1989 Batman movie and Star Wars and then added more to my collection over a large period of time meaning nearly 20 years it took me to get my collection of VHS to over 1500 tapes.
The Death Star trench run is not a plot hole just because you find it unbelievable. Han shoots the tie fighter next to Vader, distracting him, which throws off his aim. I know that the edit of the movie shows Vader locking on, but the lasers don't hit Luke. Not sure what to tell you. Star Wars is a classic example of the hero's journey. Just look it up. Main character is living their life, they're down on their luck, then there is a call to adventure where the main character leaves all that they know and are thrust into the unknown. There are other characters, challenges, mentors, the main character grows and changes, overcomes obstacles, there might even be supernatural elements (the force) to the story, and they eventually win in the end and return home (or to the known). Luke was tapping into the Force with the aid of Obi-Wan to destroy the Death Star. Again, just because you don't find it believable that Luke can pilot an x-wing, does not make it a plot hole. "From the last time we met Obi Wan taught you well" is not a line in Empire, so I have no clue what you're going on about.
@@garrethboland Yeah... sometimes people just invent reason to be mad. Like, if you don't like the movie, fine. There are _real_ criticisms you could make instead of pretending that implausibility equals plot hole.
@@Wendy_O._Koopa Exactly! Thank you.
I think what you’re missing is that the force and the fact that his dad was the greatest pilot ever are why he can fly so well.
Also anything he says about Obi-Wan is clearly a taunt. “How’s your dead mentor” is a little on the nose.
thing about the movies that involve shrinking people , i cant shake the thought that people would die due human bodies being unable to process the now enlarged air/oxygen in comparison to normal ..... perhaps im way off , but seems like you'd suffocate or something
??? You make no sense. What about small animals?
At SOME point, this would be an issue. But probably only after the oxygen molecules became a significant percentage of the individuals size. But that size, is probably somewhere near their already self-imposed "no subatomic" limit anyway.
This is a thing in Star Trek: Deep Space Nine. There is an episode where three of the crew members are in a shuttlecraft and fly into some space radiation nonsense, and exiting it makes them shrink. When they get back to the station they find it has been taken over, so they have to sneak around the station in order to help the normal-sized crew members. They stay inside the shuttlecraft the whole time, except for when they need to sabotage a system in order to help stop the invasion. They need to get inside the system, so they have to beam in some air that was also shrunk with them in order to breathe inside the electrical component that they're sabotaging, and they have to work really quickly because there's a limited supply. After they stop the invasion, the normal-sized crew members help them get back to normal size using the space radiation nonsense.