It has been some time since this has been posted, but encountering it now has proven very useful. Thank you for the detailed explanation and the method of presentation.
A fabulous lecture, in which each and every step is clearly explained......... Extremely understandable content, short and sweet....... And a special "Hats Off" for the awesome handwriting and graphs...
It has been some time since this has been posted, but encountering it now has proven very useful. Thank you for the detailed explanation and the method of presentation.
A fabulous lecture, in which each and every step is clearly explained.........
Extremely understandable content, short and sweet.......
And a special "Hats Off" for the awesome handwriting and graphs...
Jitin Pillai Thank you for the positive feedback! :)
Now a more advanced form is using Laplace Transforms. Awesome Teaching.
Thank you it was helpful
But at 5:29 I think it should be RC
Yes, you're right. When I multiplied both sides by C, forget to stick that C in there. Thanks.
AK LECTURES thank u...I thought I was wrong.
waooo sir... honestly you areee great ...
EXACTLY HOW MANY DEGREES DO YOU HAVE?
Thanks sir for this derivation.
AMAZING VIDEO!! Thank You soo much
6:23 can you explain please why is -ln? not +ln
I think is it multiplied by (-1) due to d(-Q) right?
the electron motion is the opposite than the current motion we chose in the previous exercises right?
Thank you, really useful!
what about parallel RC circuits?
Ey thank you so muchhhhh
There is a mistake
VC-Q=(dQ/dt)R on upper left corner should be VC-Q=(dQ/dt)CR
Pankaj kumar upper left? lol
props
PRAlea PTMProducts Thanks :)