Danny Rensch transcript from this game “yep. yeah. yeah. yep. yep. oh wow. yep. mhmmm. yep. yeah. I was going to say that! yep. yeah. yep. yep. yep. yep. yep. yep. okay let’s take a break” Entire transcript takes place while Fabi is talking btw.
god the hess caruana analysis has been so on point (also danny’s awkward humor LMAO) I haven’t really felt too much need to pan forward (also Yifan was super cool)
Definitely is the great combo of commentators and adding Caruana, that for me is the next World Champion. Is super excellent. Loved. Really great job!!!
Magnus should definitely try the Fried Liver Attack, and try to get Nepo out of preparation. If anyone from his Magnus' team is reading the comments, hit me up - I've got a novelty that I used to take down some 1700 ELO pizzas in blitz - guaranteed win.
Ok. I am from Magnus's team but can't pay you more than 1 million usd for your ideas. Is it ok ? If yes , pl give your swiss bank account number and take the blue pill.
3:50:20 i just love the moment when nepo hears, that he played an almost perfect game with magnus. The realization, how good he actually played must have been like a pretaste for the world champion title!!
Fabi is doing the best commentary on the title match anywhere. Danny needs to take a back seat and let Fabi do the talking. And stop cutting him off in mid-sentence!
Can someone explain to me the reasoning behind allowing rapid chess to potentially determine a classical world chess title. If after 14 games they're tied at 7-7 Magnus retains his title. It's up to Ian to beat Magnus. Kasparov was trailing Karpov 11-12. Karpov only needed a draw to win the title. Kasparov won game 24, tied it at 12-12 and retained his title. No rapid games needed!!! Please don't say it's to determine money...really???
the problem is that this is unfair for the challenger, tieing the match doesn't mean the reigning world champion is better than the challenger, then why could the reigning world champion remains his title? We are all trying to improve the rules but sadly since chess is a special game with the first-mover always having advantage, we can never have a simple and fair tie-break at the same time
The reasoning is there's too many whiners, the same kind of people who are already complaining about this match after 3 draws. Don't worry, there's higher chance it will become dumber rather than more pure.
I'm ONE THOUSAND PERCENT with you. (@W Chambers) THIS IS LONG FORMAT CHESS, NOT BLITZ! There's no place for this in a world championship. It's always been set up so that time IS NOT a factor. Lasker and Steinitz didn't have to deal with this. WHY? WHY WHY? I'm almost certain the reason is of a pecuniary nature.
@@ericzhu6620 It's simple. It's because the onus is on the challenger to prove he is better than the World Champion and the onus is not on the World Champion to prove he is better than the challenger, since the World Champion beat the last Candidates tournament winner...It is kind of like the U.S. justice system. The onus is always on the Prosecutor to prove a case, since he's the one who makes the claim. Winning the candidates is sort of like making a claim that the challenger can beat the Champion. The onus is on him to prove it. If Ian wins, he will have the advantage on the next World Championship and the candidates winner will have the same disadvantage.
During the Soviet era, government told their scientists to find doping for chess. To help Karpov in WC matches. So Russia has a long history of doping in chess.
I love chess in every direction. The analysis here is great too. But what's with these competitors constantly abandoning their seats? At some times both players are missing! It's a little ridiculous. The match might as well be played remotely via zoom.
Seems odd that both players leave the board for such long periods of time. Magnus plays against an empty seat for nearly 20 minutes near the opening! Very anti-climatic, this getting sweaty in the stare of a swivel office chair.
@@rhobh1868 thank you. I didn't know they have to play so many games. I thought they play just one and then we have the winner 🏆 🥇 So, every day they will play by one game? Can we watch them here at this channel ?
@@florinstoica5357 It's not that simple. Chess at the highest level now, backed by engines like Stockfish, is almost always going to be a draw with "perfect" or "correct" play. Look at the engine evaluation at the beginning of the game, it's basically 0 (equal). It doesn't matter that Magnus is the consensus best player in the world right now, I'd estimate that there's at the very least 10-15 top players in the world that can consistently hold him to a draw on demand. Wins only occur when a player blunders, which at this level is extremely rare and also hard to take advantage of. It's not like Ian is going to randomly hang a knight or blunder checkmate.
![КАРЛСЕН - НЕПОМНЯЩИЙ | 2 партия | Комментируют Крамник и Карякин | Lichess.org [RU]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/h2skR4ZAHlY/mqdefault.jpg)
Fabi has been fantastic in these, thanks for the coverage
Thank you so much for changing the layout, so we can see the live and the analysis board. Great decision!
Game starts at 45:50
edit:
Oh… they changed it to 25:00 lol
Thank you
Great coverage. Keeping the actual live position on screen at most times is a good improvement.
Danny Rensch transcript from this game “yep. yeah. yeah. yep. yep. oh wow. yep. mhmmm. yep. yeah. I was going to say that! yep. yeah. yep. yep. yep. yep. yep. yep. okay let’s take a break”
Entire transcript takes place while Fabi is talking btw.
god the hess caruana analysis has been so on point (also danny’s awkward humor LMAO) I haven’t really felt too much need to pan forward (also Yifan was super cool)
Definitely is the great combo of commentators and adding Caruana, that for me is the next World Champion. Is super excellent. Loved. Really great job!!!
Fabi commentary is Fab, I really like Hou Yifan too, but I think Ian might be the next world champion
Magnus should definitely try the Fried Liver Attack, and try to get Nepo out of preparation.
If anyone from his Magnus' team is reading the comments, hit me up - I've got a novelty that I used to take down some 1700 ELO pizzas in blitz - guaranteed win.
lol..as if they care about your comment
@@XoPlanetI Bruh, I have GMs sliding in my DMs on a daily for mad out-of-book variations that they don't teach on TH-cam.
@@threethrushes funny..
Ok. I am from Magnus's team but can't pay you more than 1 million usd for your ideas. Is it ok ? If yes , pl give your swiss bank account number and take the blue pill.
3:50:20 i just love the moment when nepo hears, that he played an almost perfect game with magnus. The realization, how good he actually played must have been like a pretaste for the world champion title!!
this didnt age well
@@williamku2949this really didnt age well after ding played Rg6 💀💀💀
Fabi is doing the best commentary on the title match anywhere. Danny needs to take a back seat and let Fabi do the talking. And stop cutting him off in mid-sentence!
Magnus was asked who is the best player of all time. His answer. Magnus Carlson
Mr. Hikaru "i don't know" Nakamura
Fabi at 2:48:00 is crazy
cool ad tbh
it´s amazing how much better your coverage is than chess24´s :D (gave them one chance but they almost analyzed as much as me by myfrigginself lol)
@3:57:56 for the real star of the show.
53:30 fork the Q / R instead?
Can someone explain to me the reasoning behind allowing rapid chess to potentially determine a classical world chess title. If after 14 games they're tied at 7-7 Magnus retains his title. It's up to Ian to beat Magnus. Kasparov was trailing Karpov 11-12. Karpov only needed a draw to win the title. Kasparov won game 24, tied it at 12-12 and retained his title. No rapid games needed!!! Please don't say it's to determine money...really???
the problem is that this is unfair for the challenger, tieing the match doesn't mean the reigning world champion is better than the challenger, then why could the reigning world champion remains his title? We are all trying to improve the rules but sadly since chess is a special game with the first-mover always having advantage, we can never have a simple and fair tie-break at the same time
In no other game does “I won last time against someone else” change the outcome this time.
The reasoning is there's too many whiners, the same kind of people who are already complaining about this match after 3 draws. Don't worry, there's higher chance it will become dumber rather than more pure.
I'm ONE THOUSAND PERCENT with you. (@W Chambers) THIS IS LONG FORMAT CHESS, NOT BLITZ! There's no place for this in a world championship. It's always been set up so that time IS NOT a factor.
Lasker and Steinitz didn't have to deal with this. WHY? WHY WHY? I'm almost certain the reason is of a pecuniary nature.
@@ericzhu6620 It's simple. It's because the onus is on the challenger to prove he is better than the World Champion and the onus is not on the World Champion to prove he is better than the challenger, since the World Champion beat the last Candidates tournament winner...It is kind of like the U.S. justice system. The onus is always on the Prosecutor to prove a case, since he's the one who makes the claim. Winning the candidates is sort of like making a claim that the challenger can beat the Champion. The onus is on him to prove it. If Ian wins, he will have the advantage on the next World Championship and the candidates winner will have the same disadvantage.
Whats the name of this song i cant find it 0:32
2:00:45 both clocks going at the same time
Fabi's as good at commentating as he is at playing.
Song name at 00:17:00 please??
any of you know the song being played at 2:53:00 ? been trying to find it, its amazing
There s no song there but I would love to know the name of the opera song
It was a perfect match!
Stockfish 14 draws with Stockfish 14!!😀😀😀😀😀
What, you think drawing stockfish is easy? If you play one inperfect move you might lose
@@thedamnmoron might? it's certain
What about making it so the first 3 moves on the side of white cannot be exactly repeated on any games
man i'm sure the players are jizzing off of this match, but as a new kid it's very hard to follow
Feel, but still exciting
2:52:01
Like Danny but we need to see and hear 90% less from him,let Fabi talk and try not interrupt him.
During the Soviet era, government told their scientists to find doping for chess. To help Karpov in WC matches.
So Russia has a long history of doping in chess.
I love chess in every direction. The analysis here is great too. But what's with these competitors constantly abandoning their seats? At some times both players are missing! It's a little ridiculous. The match might as well be played remotely via zoom.
Maybe they were shy against camera
It's because most players above 2300 prefer visualising the position over looking at it.
Seems odd that both players leave the board for such long periods of time. Magnus plays against an empty seat for nearly 20 minutes near the opening! Very anti-climatic, this getting sweaty in the stare of a swivel office chair.
kasparov is goat?
Who won these three games last days please? Is anyone can tell?
@@AdityaSharma-gv8fb thanks!
But, how is this possible??
I thought Magnus is invincible! I mean he didn't lost but how he couldn't win this guy Ian
@@AdityaSharma-gv8fb they will continue to play?
@@florinstoica5357 yes 11 more games
@@rhobh1868 thank you.
I didn't know they have to play so many games.
I thought they play just one and then we have the winner 🏆 🥇
So, every day they will play by one game? Can we watch them here at this channel ?
@@florinstoica5357 It's not that simple. Chess at the highest level now, backed by engines like Stockfish, is almost always going to be a draw with "perfect" or "correct" play. Look at the engine evaluation at the beginning of the game, it's basically 0 (equal). It doesn't matter that Magnus is the consensus best player in the world right now, I'd estimate that there's at the very least 10-15 top players in the world that can consistently hold him to a draw on demand. Wins only occur when a player blunders, which at this level is extremely rare and also hard to take advantage of. It's not like Ian is going to randomly hang a knight or blunder checkmate.
did you guys just spend 20 minutes talking about H3?
Fisher random only
Why do I have to watch the match from small screen and your moves from large screen?
Fabi's Boyfriend was here 😱😉😛
who? when?
LMAO GOLDEN STATE CLIPPERS
This guy is such a troll.
He said it like “Golden State/Clippers” as in Golden State vs Clippers, c’mon man.
i wish i could..."trade rooks" with yifan....
Tal defeat all.
Who can resist Danny in a dress coat 😉
Go,carlsen magnus..beat nepo now..tactics can even a draw but makes your the best snap shot....
Robert is a little mean to Daniel, I get he’s trying to be funny, but help a guy out a little