So you will do nothing, Sledgehammer? Apathy is death, worse than death. Because at least a rotting corpse feeds the beasts and insects. Act Man Plushie's on SALE ➤ www.makeship.com/products/the-act-man-plush Follow me on Twitch ➤ www.twitch.tv/theactingmale
It’s time for me to play something else or get my homework done. These are far more valueable things than sitting through another bare bones, microtransaction-infected COD game.
One of my closest friends is actually a curator at the museum the Vanguard devs went to for their "research". He told me he had prepped an entire lineup of different variations of weapons and such, but the devs told him word for word "we just want what looks cool". They blew off almost an entire tour, took a handful of pictures, and left. The lack of respect for history really shows in the game.
They could have just used google. But, SHG is the dumbest studio that acts as deadweight like a mother views their baby before throwing it in a dumpster because it was too late for abortion. That is SHG. Axe the studio microsoft
Explains a lot as to why the game looks the way it does. Man, we were so darn spoiled back in the 90s and 2000s with all those World War shooters that made honest attempts at capturing the authenticity of the time period.
COD World at War: "This place once echoed with conversations of friends and lovers. No longer. Mark my words comrade, one day things will change. We will take the fight to their land, to their people, to their blood." COD Vanguard: "I shoot Nazis. They die. That's the plan."
The CHAD Call of duty world at war: Has memorable lines and quotes "TAKE OUT THOSE FUCKING PT BOATS" Good gameplay Honors the vets who died fight the unforgiving war The VIRGIN COD Vanguard: "I shoot Nazis. They die. That's the plan".
Theres more to this character, some details that you can see from her flashback, but its so bad - it would've been better if she didn't have it at all.
Honestly, Actman is right, if they went out of their ways and made an Alternate Universe where everything is steampunkish and had weapon modification aesthetics like in Bioshock, it would totally fit in Edit: Holy shit I didn't expect this to blow up, nice to see so many agree with me, you too Actman, nice to see a good homie.
@@TheActMan how about a WW2 game where Steiner attack actually happened and the war continued or WW2 ended with Japan only.And there would have been something like Korean War were Me262 and F86 Sabre would dogfight? Sounds Awesome despite being not steampunkish
@@TheActMan Just imagine The germans still pushing and starting to make ghastly experiments, the Japanese not giving up and trying to build something better than a Nuke Weapon modification with valves and tubes like in Bioshock, futuristic like Stukas and juggernauts with stalhelms and armored suits. Would've been a banger, hell it would even make a kickass zombies too, I loved the robot thing and the Panzersoldat in WaW.
One thing people always forget about is that vanguard zombies doesn’t give you a reason to use certain attachments. Also, it will not let you use others
W-what?? Holy Jesus on a bycicle trip... I didnt know honestly because I didnt buy this. Be honest this game was bought for you as a form of punishment
My great grandfather was one of the few veteran Japanese soldiers who survived the Pacific war. Only reason how he was able to live was because he had to be decommissioned and sent to a physiatric ward due to PTSD when he saw his commander issuing his squad STG44s, MG42s and antique shotguns. His last words were: *Not the reflex sights...* Edit:I could say that my grandfather fought on My team, the enemy of the enemy team, but that would be too confusing
I can't tell if this is true or not. Cuz, the last words seems way too ridiculous to be true. Like, if this is true, your great grandfather had a good point.
Yea because when you make a new game every year, it’s easy to make iconic characters in each franchise. They can’t use task force 141 in every game homie
They are very detached BUT to be fair, Given the context that statement was said and they were comparing it to Master Chief, they're right. CoD has no one that even remotely compares to Master Chief when it comes to iconic. Every gamer on the planet, whether they've actually played Halo or not, knows who Master Chief is and what franchise he's from. CoD doesn't have anyone like that. You could show a non-CoD fan say...Captain Price and they'd have no idea who he is. He's just generic rugged soldier man number 1052.
@@Rawnblade13 Im not saying your wrong but I feel like captain price and his bravo six going dark is extremely iconic, same with mason and the numbers. The thing is going from older periods of war to advanced warfare then modern warfare, an just going back and forth with decades of war it’s hard to bring those iconic characters to every battle, that defeats the realism of the weapon mechanics and the storylines and all that. Master chief is known throughout each halo because it’s more fictional based. Also I think a lot of people are forgetting that when vanguard came out, they had those worker strikes right after, they were upset because the lower people were being let go, and they’re wages were being used to give the more critical workers higher revenue. But people got upset and said that’s not right, then we were left with more workers that weren’t willing to put maximum effort into it because they’re not getting paid enough. The problem with vanguard is that they actually did try to use the community feedback to help create the game and make it a better experience for everyone.
@@mikegate6764 Iconic to a CoD fan, none of that reaches Master Chief levels of iconic though. Unfortunately for CoD, due to the realistic military setting, you can't really make a character with an iconic design and it's all just generic soldier stuff. Not to mention how due to constantly switching settings, CoD can't really establish someone as iconic as Master Chief. Which is probably why the devs on Vanguard went for some pseudo Avengers-style characters, even if it doesn't really work for WW2. Master Chief works and has become iconic because he's in almost every Halo, has a unique, distinct, and easily recognizable design, and it probably doesn't hurt that Halo games don't come out every year, so they don't all blur together.
I remember when my grandpa told me about the horrors of World War 2, people getting stabbed with sledgehammers, the conflict between My Team, and Enemy Team, fighting against Attack on Titan characters, drum mag Garands, and other horrifying things.
@@howtohow8686 wait wait wait, wait a moment, no, that can't be right, there are no red dots in this game, there are only............. Y E L L O W D O T S
@@MysticalHaloV2 Imagine telling a Call of Duty fan who's currently in the year 2011 that the undisputed worst game in the franchise will be a Modern Warfare game. He wouldn't believe you. I went in thinking that MWIII was going to be pretty good, on par with MWII, and then I got kicked in the teeth by this shoddy excuse for a _DLC_ that cost 70 clams. How far has CoD fallen that a Modern Warfare title is currently being lampooned as the worst game yet?
The biggest turn off for me was when they brought out the “historically accurate” claim. That’s when I knew I had to bring out the popcorn and watch the shitstorm
The moment the writers said COD had no "iconic" characters yet. I was ACTIVELY rooting for this game to fail. I want it to fail just to spite the writers.
honestly, with how powerful modern consoles are and the large budget these companies have, there's no reason we can't large scale, multi-front campaigns and multiplayer like WaW. Show us events gaming rarely does like the Chinese front or Soviet invasion of Finland. People aren't necessarily over ww2, they're over the low effort and generic depiction of it.
100% true. We're sick of seeing this cookie cutter type shit everytime there's a ww2 game released. Give us something unique and something unforgetable, something not taught in schools. More then anything, give us the fun that we've deprived for in the last couple years in the Call Of Duty franchise.
There's a pretty anachronistic oversight in dialogue in one mission, during the Australian mission when an soldier yells "RPG!" Which wouldn't make sense because the term RPG wouldn't have been coined until the 60's when RPG's were actually invented, and Bazooka's in WW2 weren't even considered RPG's they were recoiless rifles.
the “My Team” and “Enemy Team” thing genuinely makes me laugh. the more i think about how stupid it is, the more it makes me laugh. it’s comedically awful
I'm so glad that they got the historical accuracy on point for this COD game. I remember reading in history textbooks that the guy from Attack on Titan was witnessed t-bagging soldiers on the beaches of Normondy.
I can just imagine a grandfather talking to his grandson like “We were pinned down by the enemy, we didn’t know what they looked like why they were fighting or even who they were, but none of that mattered because we were pretty sure they might possibly have been the enemy AND THAT’S ALL WE NEEDED TO KNOW
This idea that video games are a direct substitute for historical education is a fucking stupid one, and I just wish people would cut it out. This game will never harm historical education, no matter how shitty it is.
Oh I’m Sowwy for hurting your freewings by twying to be funny here I’ll give you a special snowflake award, I’m not sure if you understand the concept of humour I’m literally pointing out the fact that a game set in the Second World War lacked enough confidence to even have countries fighting each other, It was never stated that this would be harmful to historical education nor was it implied So next time think before you type you inept Troglodyte
Full disclosure I don't play FPS games. My only experience is with RPGs. But I watched this entire video. I didn't understand all the terminology 100% of the time but I honestly found this fascinating and very entertaining. Apparently more entertaining than the actual game lol. Thank you for all your hard work Act man, you are so passionate and I appreciate your dedication to gaming! Newbie sub!
Late question but do you play JRPGs like Final Fantasy or Western RPGs like The Elder Scrolls and Fallout? I like both JRPGs and Western RPGs, hell Fallout 3 is my favorite game of all time IMO
I don’t even play Vanguard. I’m just here because I love Act Man’s humor when he critiques a game’s quality. Edit: wow…1k+ likes and a heart from Acting Male himself…I can die a happy man at this point. Edit: heart got removed. I can’t die happily.
CoD Devs: "there are no Remembered / good characters" Reznov: "we've been forgotten, abandoned in Vorkuta (CoD studio's desk that nobody has touch since CoD BO2) but we will be remember, by those who know us."
“This game will teach an entire generation that grandpa stormed Normandy with a f-cking EOTech.” -Brandon Herrera Pretty much everything I hate about this game is summed up by this quote.
And still every year people seem to be hyped as fuck for the next one. That is until day 1 after launch, then it's shit again and you find urself playing a older cod instead of the one you were hyped about.
In the campaign, when you were in the train, looking at the box and they threw a flash bang at you. Flash bangs weren’t invented until the 1960s by the British
And, thanks to MGS3, I know that the Flashbang was made to be a "training grenade". Once the S.A.S. realized the uses of "Stun Grenades", they started to spam the fuck out of it. And they still do it! And so does every other country's special forces.
So for those who are wondering initially Vanguard was not going to feature a zombies bonus mode at all as Treyarch was thrown into development only 6 months before release, however due to Treyarchs reputation and Activision threatening higher ups they conceded only 10 weeks prior to release and developed a very shoddy zombies game mode. The kicker is due to Vanguards (for once) unique take on the engine Cold War could NOT be used as a basis and Zombies had to be made from the ground up in just 10 weeks. This is the reason for so many features missing in the mode.
I can truly say that the game has only gone down hill since we lost Verdansk... They have atleast cut down on some of the hackers in the Warzone lobbies... Well said brother.
1. It's been downhill since ghosts. 2. Hackers feel better than ever. You have even soft cheaters like Zlaner making a living. It's messed up. They made cheat makers and cheat players, millionaires...
That interview with the lady saying CoD has no memorable characters is just a sad reminder that the people who make important design decisions in games don't actually play them... which more often than not just translates to a game that is just out of touch with what made the series great originally, trend/profit chasing, and just disappoints existing fans entirely
Not only that, they don't care about the history, the entire story isn't even accurate, the "bloodiest war" isn't even shown to be bloody, the characters too are bland, no historical figures also shown.
I haven't played a CoD campaign since BLOPS 1 and I can still remember at least 4-5 standout characters from MW1, MW2 and Black Ops 1. My cheeks are there no memorable characters lmao
I hate cod vanguard as a historian. The STG44 firing mechanism is located in its stock, so how can you remove the stock and still fire the gun?! Gay German soldiers, heavy racism in the British army, and cursed weapons modification. It just insults history.
Racism in the. British army.. Or any other.. Makes actual sense it's the 20th century.. But them making the British army... The German one.. Yeah agreed.. Wtf
If it was the US Marines, the cursed weapon modifications would've at least made sense, given what the Marines did in ww2. Literally made a machine gun using parts from 3 separate guns.
I'd like to add something onto this, Vanguard's "new" KotH-type mode was already done in DOOM 2016's multiplayer and there it was called Warpath, they legitimately just pulled it out of a better game.
I mean this as a dig at Activision and not The Act Man: It was genuinely hard to finish this video because at certain points I couldn't stand to listen and see some things that aren't/are in my once beloved Call of Duty
If the Act Man didn't make a review on this game, I honestly wouldn't be mad. I haven't played it but the footage I've seen convinces me I made the right call.
F But hopefully with the Microsoft acquisition they can restructure the company and may bring out a half decent COD for once. Either that or they will end up pulling a Rareware and self destruct. Could really go either way as far as I see it.
Ah yes, I remember my grandpa telling me about a guy who used 10000% aim assist to take down an entire Japanese battalion. History is so crazy like that.
You can't tell me that the dentist who killed 90 Japanese soldiers so his friends could retreat, who was found dead Borimir style in a pile of corpses, wasn't using hacks
@@Fartsmellahashsella I remember it like it was yesterday. D-day.. Storming the beach was insane. The anime, the green blue and red bullets flying around that sand? Damn it was crazy. I was also the only white guy on my boat, rest were indian, russian and british women with these Japanese weapons. It was a day that I will never forget.
Definitely one of the worst regimes in history, the enemy team, is really well portrayed in this game by showing the atrocities committed against the my team
It's weird, I need answers. In multiplayer, it's my team versus enemy team, but in single player, I'm playing as enemy team. So... is it supposed to be symbolic that we are all the same? That war... War never changes?
One cashgrabby method they used is weapon blueprints. Like Act Man said, the attachments give you a severe advantage against other players. So blueprints basically say: “would you rather grind 10 hours for good attachments or spend your hard earned money” it also takes away the feeling that you at least earned that attachment you wanted and grinned for.
It’s hilarious that people want Activision to stop making CoD an annual release when it’s clear that it makes them more money not to do that. CoD isn’t the cash cow, the customers are.
People are just so goddamn stupid sometimes. It's the same thing over and over again Dumbass: gets excited about the new cod Buys cod on release date Gets angry because it's trash Gets excited about to cod again Buys cod again on release date Gets angry because its trash Gets excited about cod again Like WHY DO YOU KEEP BUYING IT THEN!!!
That’s the funny thing, NONE OF THESE MODERN GREEDY BUSINESS PRACTICES WERE EVER NEEDED!! They became legends because they put TIME and CARE into the classics, and guess what? THEY STILL MADE BIG BUCKS!! It’s almost like these greedy pigs don’t need every penny on the planet or something! Heck I’ll double down and say that they could pay their employees…and get ready for this crazy idea…a living wage :0!!!
Same here, The Last Jedi and The Last of Us Part 2 have given me more entertainment value from video essays about how bad they are than they have by themselves
Wanna know something cool? There are still assets from COD2 in Black Ops 3, and probably Vanguard as well. Every COD game they share the new stuff with the other studios their library is insanely huge at this point. COD1 used some Return to Castle Wolfenstein assets but then with COD2 they forked the idtech 3 engine and put all their own assets. Oh here's another one- You know when you go to a door in Zombies and it says "This door is opened elsewhere..."? That script is leftover in the engine all the way back from Quake 1 circa 1996
Yeah and that animation is actually from BO3. They really need to chill with the teleporting shit in zombies, it was cool when it was only between two related locations, not two random areas like a german city and shi no numa??
The fact that the man the myth the legend himself MrRoflWaffles, is literally begging people not to buy a game because of how bad zombies is truly shows off how terrible modern gaming has destroyed the entire gaming genre
plus they know game will sell regardless because there is stupid people out there, i tapped out of COD ages ago because games are same thing over and over again, they get lazy each time
Well yes but addicting things are usually fun.. call of duty has been neither addicting nor fun since black ops 3. That was the last decent cod spite the futuristic stuff.
Whats more Ironic is the fact that more recently there was a news article that said that Vanguard failed because “No one likes WW2” The fact that activision needs to blame fans instead of making an actually good game is laughable at best
Correct. WW2 based games aren't the problem; It's the fact that 80-90% of all WW2 games almost exclusively focus on the Western Front loaded with cliches, cardboard characters, and Hollywood style action sequences. In other words, WW2 games aren't the problem; It's how generic and cliche most of them are.
@@ananastudio No, don't be a clown you realise real vets worked alongside MOH which the OG cod devs came from? You realise this genre started because they wanted to teach a whole new generation about this conflict hence so many movie scenes being in these games aswell. It isn't disrespectful at all quite the opposite. Unless movies and shows are also disrespectful?
@@dragonbornexpress5650 I mean this genre took off and really started with Spielberg hence the movie clichés even with cod but guess what those games where successful the current lot aren't what does that tell ya? This I think rubbish ain't it chief.
The thing about Cold War was they found a perfect operator system: there were operators, but they were exclusive to a specific side. They still had skins, but there wasn’t an operator on your team and an enemy operator with the same skin on the other.
The flash bang they got hit by shouldn’t have existed in WW2. It didn’t get developed until the 60’s and wasn’t officially used until the 70’s so the technological inaccuracies go beyond intentional. Either that or they were too lazy to think of an alternate scenario.
@@andrewgallegos290 i agree that a game does'nt have to be 100% historical accurate , but at leaste they need to be beliavable ,and vanguard isnt beliavable.
Not to be a picky player but when I played the campaign, I noticed in the Pacific airfield portion the Japanese were using StG 44s and Lugers? Around 1943?? It baffles me because the Japanese weapons are available in multiplayer…game was rushed af. World at War was and always will be the best Pacific campaign I’ve played.
There was a historian watching the gameplay and commenting on it and a LOT of the weapons were either in the wrong time, at the completely wrong place or both. You could find a german hunting shotgun in the japanese mission. You could find STG 44s before it even was 44, you could reload panzerfausts which were one time use ... You could even find the Volkssturmgewehr, which was in service about 2-3 months before the end of the war. WaW did the weapons right, you could find respective weapons only when they made sense. The FG42 in seelow heights e.g. was correctly placed, because the seelow height battle actually featured a german paratrooper unit.
I'm playing world at war right now and damn it, they could just remaster It and never touch anything that don't need to be fixed,.except the mp40 damage
@@Sliiiiicedcheese it is probably the worst weapon for mp, sure firerate and very managable recoil but damage sucks and damage dropoff is even worse :/
It always astounds me how AAA titles have like zero scope when it comes to WWII, even after over 20 years of the genre being around. Like literally have a conflict that spanned for 6 years on almost every continent of the world, but if you ask a activision employee the conflict took place from 1942 to 1944 in France and Russia. Activision had the balls to let you play as a mass shooter almost 15 years ago, but they still don't have the balls to let you play as the Germans in a cod campaign.
same with not having a swastika any more and only having the iron cross, because that's apparently "offensive." So if you're able to play a game rated M for "mature", why is some logo on a flag going to offend you? COD used to be so good, the last good COD game was black ops, which came out in 2010, and actually had swastikas in zombies. Everything now is a bunch of woke garbage. They're definitely was black women enlisted as US Marines storming an island in the south pacific killing Japanese soldiers... totally.
@@internetuser8371 Yah, the irony of the entire thing is really palpable, ever since "the nuke" in cod 4, cods thing has been being edgy and going for shock value. 5 you got to see serious war crimes committed by all sides, MWII you had the airport massacre, black ops you had the reznov twist, etc, somewhere along the way though they became a lot more politically conscious but at the same time tried to keep the edginess and gritiness of the past games, so the entire thing just becomes a convoluted cringy mess as a result. I would love if they just went back to the basics of like the first 3 COD games and just dropped the plot and even characters for that matter, and just had you play through set pieces that actually happened during the war and that we have never got to see, like playing as the finnish during the winter war, or the poles trying desperately to fend off the german blitzkrieg (and then later playing as free polish forces in italy) or how about you follow a group of german soldiers from barborrosa and show everything gradually go to shit for them. The possibilities are literally endless, but we only see the same recycled stuff again and again. EA was "slightly" better with battlefield I guess, featured norway and a tiny section where you were able to play as a tiger tank crew.
What I really want, is a vietnam vod game with a campaign that doesn't have an uplifting ending. The shit we have all heard about Vietnam is GRIM. I wanna see that on display. And for it to basically have a similar message to WaW ending with the 60M people dead. That war is bad, horrific, and even if it's over, the horror doesn't leave you.
@@bigbargemarge7675 "But where can we get all the microtransactions and bullshit skins to fit in and the whole niche weapon meta to exist?!?!/!1?1/?!/1?!?!1/!??!??!!??"-Retarded Executives in Activision, probably.
You know, the saddest thing about Vanguard is that, according to early leaks, they were _originally_ going for a Wolfenstein-esque aesthetic of an alternate history where the Axis won WWII, but changed their minds at some point. And do you know why that would be? Could it have been to be more accurate to WWII? Could it have been because they believed it to be somewhat disrespectful to history? Nope. It’s because they need the game to tie in narratively to World at War, Black Ops and Modern Warfare for Warzone. You can’t have an alternate history where the Axis won because you can’t do that without the MW and BO timelines being broken. They’re trying to do, like, a fucking Call of Duty cinematic universe with all their games now by connecting it together, and it just limits their options and dilutes the story.
Ironically, even with Vanguard at launch, there was no connection to any of the previous games including Cold War and MW 2019, so then it begs the question: What was even the point of going for a big connected universe if your own game doesn't connect to that universe?
@@dragonbornexpress5650 *These people are fucking dumb* Like, shouldn't they have started WITH the WW2 scenario first _BEFORE_ going into Cold War times, and THEN a Modern Warfare time!?
My Grandfather barely made it out of Okinawa alive. He was in the middle of building a bridge under heavy Enemy Team fire, when a member of the Enemy Team ran up and stabbed him with a sledgehammer. He barely survived and now has a crippling fear of sledgehammers to this day.
It's crazy how something that was supposed to be cool for us and the devs by making us able to get more content just turned into "let's see the worst thing we can put out that people will still buy"
@@classicsteakZ096 Game Freak at least puts care into their games.... you might not notice cause you're too bust on your high fucking horse over Techinical issues that can always be fixed
@@theoneandonlyjim902I played Pokémon violet and I can tell you that the main problem with the game is the performance. the gameplay is fun, the new Pokémons are good, and there’s a lot you can do in the game.
The one thing I love about The Act Man's Reviews there is NO HOLDING BACK. Just the Detail of Information he goes into every aspect I respect the Grind.
Except when it came to Infinite not only did he barely point out flaws but he knowingly lied through his teeth and his "follow-up" was a joke as well. Dude got paid to hype infinite plain and simple and if he didn't he's a fanboy of the worst kind
One of the less talked about evils of CoD Vanguard is having an American storyline in the campaign, but only allowing the player to use two US weapons (the M1911 and M1 Flamethrower) even though the US firearms were arguably some of the coolest in WWII. Also, I like how Sledgehammer included Jackson on the team because he was a master fighter pilot, but then made him do missions on the ground as a grunt (because apparently the most skilled commando the US had at the time also just so happens to be the most skilled pilot as well). Not to mention the ludicrous notion that the US and Soviet Russia would agree to send their best soldier to fight on a team behind enemy lines rather than keeping them to use on their own fronts. And one last thing. Sledgehammer had the 93rd Infantry Division rescue the pilot once his plane was shot down by the Japanese to score brownie points from people who only care about whether or not the game is inclusive. The problem is the 93rd really only did construction work and occasionally played a defensive role during the war, yet they’re portrayed as being part of like a tank battalion. I get the feeling Sledgehammer just Googled, “all black unit wwii,” and picked the first result that came up without doing any actual research. Not to mention that the 93rd weren’t even at Bougainville during the time the story was set (nor were StG-44s for that matter). If they gave a shit, they could’ve done a storyline about the 761st Tank Battalion “the Black Panthers,” who fought with General Patton during the Battle of the Bulge rather than a construction unit to give the illusion of inclusiveness. But then they couldn’t boast about the campaign including all fronts of the war in their marketing I guess.
@@spaceman624 That wouldn’t happen to be Big Red One would it? I vaguely remember that game and believe there was a mission set during the Battle of the Bulge.
@Samuellee Ogboko Jr “We’re not sure why we were fighting men on Enemy Team. We knew nothing of their culture or their motivations. All we knew was that they stood for everything that we didn’t marching under the banner of a plus sign.” -An unnamed soldier of the Second “My Team” Expeditionary Force
I stopped playing when during the Japanese missions you could pick up STGs and MG-42s off Japanese soldiers. How unbelievably stupid do you have to be to put the wrong guns in the wrong theater
I love that act man has come to appreciate and enjoy the complex zombies maps, especially considering the amount of content they could really add, and seeing how vanguard just never captured what made zombies so fun
I remember a quote Act Man brought up from his World at War review: "A true war story is never moral. It does not instruct, nor encourage virtue, nor suggests models of proper human behavior, nor restrain men from doing the things men have always done. If a story seems moral, do not believe it. If at the end of a war story you feel uplifted, or if you feel that some small bit of recititude has been salvaged from the larger wastes, then you have been made the victim of a very old and terrible lie." - Time O'Brien, The Things They Carried.
@@pootisengage6672 yeah germany was bad in it's history. not all people though. keep that in mind. tere were those that actively were against the Nazis and those that were against them, but scared because even just saying something against the governemt could get you killed. and then you had those that were completely on board with the ideology.
The vanguard grenade emote where the guy has his hands on his head is the exact same emote from Junkrat. They are not only recycling shit from older cods but they are also recycling from their other games.
It's astonishing how technology has advanced in the last decade, yet Call of Duty titles continue to come out on a yearly cycle with less and less innovation each time.
Brandon Herrera’s “cursed guns of COD Vanguard” is sooo damn accurate. You can legit turn a weapon into a completely different weapon…just by using the attachments…
@@NotKameron Look up Gamespot : "Firearms Expert Reacts To Call Of Duty: Vanguard’s Guns" he's a very frequent guest on that channel but he also part of the channel "Royal Armories" where he and other meusem staff show off and go over the history of certain weapons.
@@badasscrusader i woudn't even consider it accepted. people are just, for lack of better words, desperate enough to buy the new game since it's new and something to play, only to learn that it's terrible. problem is the companies already made their money, so to them, everything is fine since the met their sale numbers. theeen they learn people will buy anything, so the least amount of effort is put in knowing it'll sell because people want the newest installment. then the cycle repeats itself.
22:30 The Acting Male : "How does stuff like this get past quality assurance ???" Activision : _"Bold of you to assume that we even have a department for Quality Assurance"_
I can’t believe it’s taken consumers this long to realize how stale and repetitive Cod’s formula is, what with each game releasing every year. I gave up on Cod by the time I’d played Advanced Warfare. My third cod game.
The same I question I asked regarding Battlefield Bad Company 2 and Battlefield 4's Singleplayer Campaign difficulties being all the same. The number of hits it takes to die on Easy, is exactly the same as it is on Hard.
We need a cod game set in vietnam with multiple characters, kinda like vanguard, like 1 person who is a marine FORECON, another person who is a MACV-SOG operator, a Green Beret, and an Army Ranger. The story would basically be set in 4 different areas, one in Tay Ninh, one in Khe Sanh, one in Hue City, and one in Da Nang. The MACV-SOG operator will be in Khe Sanh and Da Nang, the FORECON will be in Khe Sanh and Da Nang, The Green Beret will be in Tay Ninh and Khe Sanh, and the army ranger will be at Tay Ninh and Hue City.
That one person who was at the comic con and said that there’s no one you think of when you hear Call of Duty actually shocked me. There’s no way she played any game in the series.
I was playing the Russian mission set in stalingrad. I thought there would be a Reznov or Dimitri easter egg. Because we were about to Kill Steiner. Only to be majorly disappointed because there was not even a nudge or anything about those characters.
To be fair, given her comparison to Master Chief, no, I don't think CoD has anyone who compares to how iconic Master Chief is. Even non-Halo fans know who Master Chief is, CoD doesn't have anyone on that level and that's probably what she meant. Probably. Though obviously they didn't seem to try that hard with this game either to succeed at that goal...
Honestly in general cod is such a huge franchise but doesn't have a mascot at the size of master chief, Lara Croft or really any other similar franchise size. It's probably akin to assassins Creed where Ezio is super popular in its respective fandom but no one outside of it really knows or cares about him.
@@Rawnblade13 That's only because you play as Master Chief in 90 percent of the Halo games And there is like 11 of them. If I can Remember Woods, Mason, Reznov, and Makarov in less time that's impressive writing.
Vanguard could have done a storyline where the war didn't end in 1945, and is pushing into the mid '50s, and so the arms technology race progressed even faster than in reality. This would been a probably universally accepted reason for all the weapons attachments, and the spec ops squads being akin to Cold War-era units.
Here’s a cool idea for a game mode: Air Raid, one team plays as planes like fighters/bombers, the other plays as the airbase defences, like flak cannons and AA guns, the goal is to capture the airbase by getting C47 style paratroopers for the plane team, and wait for air support for the defence team
“Call Of Duty Vanguard is teaching a whole generation of teenagers that their great grandfathers stormed Normandy with a fucking Eotech” “If you’re gonna sacrifice some realism to make the game fun, at least have a fun game.” - Brandon Herrera
this sounds like the kind of game I'd play as a super young kid and my older brother would show me the safe zone and we'd feel smart for "outsmarting" the evil zombies
To be completely honest, when I launched the campaign, I just sat there, looking at how the train moved and the environment just kept repeating itself, as if it was in and endless loop. After 10 minutes of standing on the train doing nothing, I uninstalled the campaign and went straight to multiplayer. Shit was whack; everything felt like I was playing MW19 with a World War 2 reskin placed on top. I don't need to talk about the weapons because I don't want to talk about the weapons. Zombies was...wait, what was that again? Nah, never mind, It wasn't that important. Vanguard is, at best, forgettable. I assumed that "return to their roots" meant adding old characters from the very first games as operators, retell their stories and such. Turns out that all we've got are these cringe-worthy "comic book heroes and heroines". Fuck me.
At the very least, Its not like they're radio silent, like EA is(and has been so far)with 2042. They fucked up so bad that everything they do or say becomes a PR nightmare. That's what you get for knowingly rushing and releasing an unfinished product and selling it full price. If you really want to play Vanguard, stick to Multiplayer.
@@sc1on but the feeling of anarchocristic and painful progression system, decent map design but extremely bland and stale (no authentic) even the fucking grind that Activision force u to stay in this hell aren’t that interesting enough to keep doing the pain so I just say “fuck you, I finally done with your shit and never ever see you again” type of thing.
@@sc1on Or just don’t give Activision money for this actual meme of a game. There are indie games worth 10 or 15 bucks that have a thousand times the soul and content of this game.
@@Phrscv I could, yes. I already do, in fact. Vanguard was a lost cause for me. I only spend money on bundles from past games and the battle pass for every season. I just hope MWII doesn't screw over all the good stuff MW19 had.
My least favorite thing that’s happened with recent cod multiplayer lobbies is you never play with the same lobby twice. It’s new people everytime. I understand why because when people have different modes selected for queue you can’t have them all play TDM if they have four other modes selected. I just wish you could choose single modes and match with other players in those modes and stay in the same lobbies over multiple matches
This game was like WWII given the “Avengers” treatment. Yeah a conflict that witnessed unthinkable horrific acts of pure inhumanity on a global scale accompanied by the 70+ million dead totally deserves the light-hearted team-up Avengers tone adaptation. By far Call of Duty at its laziest and most pathetic. I’m so happy people are not being kind to the title.
If this "Avengers" wannabe trying to beat the WW2, they should make another using "Justice League" in Korean War, Vietnam or even WW1... If they maked one in the future.
The moment that she said COD had no noteworthy or iconic characters is the moment I knew this campaign was doomed. Though with how ambitious they were going with it (In concept) I kinda adore it, but the execution was not exactly the best.
Sometimes I wonder, “Is cod maybe making their games so bad just so we get a better feeling when they finally decide they should make a good game again?”
@@g2jxGhF5G8z1gL7S maybe the most pessimist devs do that, but the ones who still give a s-it about their work probably still try in some capacity, and SHG is clearly part of the pessimist group who barely tries anymore, but I don’t know if I can blame them considering how bad Activision treats them with the strict deadlines and lack of creative freedom to work in something else (I’m sure they’re sick of CoD at this point)
Sure, set expectations so low that when they decide to meagerly exceed those low expectations, everybody hails it as a masterpiece to cope with their poor purchasing habits.
So you will do nothing, Sledgehammer? Apathy is death, worse than death. Because at least a rotting corpse feeds the beasts and insects.
Act Man Plushie's on SALE ➤ www.makeship.com/products/the-act-man-plush
Follow me on Twitch ➤ www.twitch.tv/theactingmale
Do a BioShock Infinite review🔥
I lov u
It’s time for me to play something else or get my homework done. These are far more valueable things than sitting through another bare bones, microtransaction-infected COD game.
Uncharted 4 review
tf
One of my closest friends is actually a curator at the museum the Vanguard devs went to for their "research". He told me he had prepped an entire lineup of different variations of weapons and such, but the devs told him word for word "we just want what looks cool". They blew off almost an entire tour, took a handful of pictures, and left. The lack of respect for history really shows in the game.
They could have just used google. But, SHG is the dumbest studio that acts as deadweight like a mother views their baby before throwing it in a dumpster because it was too late for abortion.
That is SHG. Axe the studio microsoft
unless there is any proof other than your word, this comment is baseless.
Explains a lot as to why the game looks the way it does. Man, we were so darn spoiled back in the 90s and 2000s with all those World War shooters that made honest attempts at capturing the authenticity of the time period.
Sounds made up lmao
Up. The lack of respect. This is so sad and unbelievable.
Call of a Duty has finally broken the Act Man
yes
“They can’t keep getting away with thisssssss”
It was done doing that since after mw 2019
Pretty much lol
Including gamers as a whole
The worst part about the campaign is that I didn’t even see the enemy build at least one bridge.
THEY’RE BUILDING A BRIDGE
Ok now its definitely not worth buying
Bruh what a fucking scam, right?
@@TheActMan I know bro
@@TheActMan Would you have enjoyed it if the enemy had built that bridge?
"No call of duty will be released in 2023" that aged like milk
truly
And it’s basically a $70 DLC with a shitty campaign according to reviews
Can’t believe I wasted 70 bucks on a warzone ripoff and a story more soulless and confusing than vanguard’s.
And y'know what? Vanguard was somehow better.
technically it's still true cause lol lmao MW3 aint no game
COD World at War:
"This place once echoed with conversations of friends and lovers. No longer. Mark my words comrade, one day things will change. We will take the fight to their land, to their people, to their blood."
COD Vanguard:
"I shoot Nazis. They die. That's the plan."
The CHAD Call of duty world at war:
Has memorable lines and quotes
"TAKE OUT THOSE FUCKING PT BOATS"
Good gameplay
Honors the vets who died fight the unforgiving war
The VIRGIN COD Vanguard:
"I shoot Nazis. They die. That's the plan".
@@creamery299 cod vanguard: "dO yOu sPeAk jApAneSe?"
@@yesfiraswa "oui"
Theres more to this character, some details that you can see from her flashback, but its so bad - it would've been better if she didn't have it at all.
Call of duty have seen better days
Honestly, Actman is right, if they went out of their ways and made an Alternate Universe where everything is steampunkish and had weapon modification aesthetics like in Bioshock, it would totally fit in
Edit: Holy shit I didn't expect this to blow up, nice to see so many agree with me, you too Actman, nice to see a good homie.
It would be a MASTERPIECE!!!
They played it too safe. Would've been cool to see a WWII game where the fighting just like... never ended
@@TheActMan how about a WW2 game where Steiner attack actually happened and the war continued or WW2 ended with Japan only.And there would have been something like Korean War were Me262 and F86 Sabre would dogfight?
Sounds Awesome despite being not steampunkish
Or go even crazier and do a whole game based on the Cod Zombies Origin map. That world was so coo, but only appears in the one instance
@@TheActMan Just imagine
The germans still pushing and starting to make ghastly experiments, the Japanese not giving up and trying to build something better than a Nuke
Weapon modification with valves and tubes like in Bioshock, futuristic like Stukas and juggernauts with stalhelms and armored suits. Would've been a banger, hell it would even make a kickass zombies too, I loved the robot thing and the Panzersoldat in WaW.
One thing people always forget about is that vanguard zombies doesn’t give you a reason to use certain attachments. Also, it will not let you use others
Are you shroud
W-what?? Holy Jesus on a bycicle trip... I didnt know honestly because I didnt buy this.
Be honest this game was bought for you as a form of punishment
@@tobyconoley5511 i mean yes but for 26USD not the worst purchase, but never worth more than 30USD.
@@tobyconoley5511 refunded
The "I would rather play ghosts part" was actually censored for me by a low battery message on my headphones 💀
Ain't no way 💀💀💀
Even your headphones couldn't believe their ears that's even possible to hear lol! "Vanguard worse than Ghost?! That's impossible!"😭😂
g o o d
“There can be no greater heresy!”
My great grandfather was one of the few veteran Japanese soldiers who survived the Pacific war. Only reason how he was able to live was because he had to be decommissioned and sent to a physiatric ward due to PTSD when he saw his commander issuing his squad STG44s, MG42s and antique shotguns.
His last words were:
*Not the reflex sights...*
Edit:I could say that my grandfather fought on My team, the enemy of the enemy team, but that would be too confusing
Must be those freight ships that turn out to have guns on them
I thought you were being legit for a second lol
I can't tell if this is true or not. Cuz, the last words seems way too ridiculous to be true. Like, if this is true, your great grandfather had a good point.
@@MA78yt ofc it's a joke
Can't believe bombers were bombing in the game
The "not having iconic characters" thing shows just how detached the company really is from their franchise. Expect failure.
Yea because when you make a new game every year, it’s easy to make iconic characters in each franchise. They can’t use task force 141 in every game homie
@@clownbaby3877 The point was that they said COD has *NO* iconic characters. Who cares if they weren't in this COD.
They are very detached BUT to be fair, Given the context that statement was said and they were comparing it to Master Chief, they're right. CoD has no one that even remotely compares to Master Chief when it comes to iconic. Every gamer on the planet, whether they've actually played Halo or not, knows who Master Chief is and what franchise he's from.
CoD doesn't have anyone like that. You could show a non-CoD fan say...Captain Price and they'd have no idea who he is. He's just generic rugged soldier man number 1052.
@@Rawnblade13 Im not saying your wrong but I feel like captain price and his bravo six going dark is extremely iconic, same with mason and the numbers. The thing is going from older periods of war to advanced warfare then modern warfare, an just going back and forth with decades of war it’s hard to bring those iconic characters to every battle, that defeats the realism of the weapon mechanics and the storylines and all that. Master chief is known throughout each halo because it’s more fictional based.
Also I think a lot of people are forgetting that when vanguard came out, they had those worker strikes right after, they were upset because the lower people were being let go, and they’re wages were being used to give the more critical workers higher revenue. But people got upset and said that’s not right, then we were left with more workers that weren’t willing to put maximum effort into it because they’re not getting paid enough. The problem with vanguard is that they actually did try to use the community feedback to help create the game and make it a better experience for everyone.
@@mikegate6764 Iconic to a CoD fan, none of that reaches Master Chief levels of iconic though. Unfortunately for CoD, due to the realistic military setting, you can't really make a character with an iconic design and it's all just generic soldier stuff. Not to mention how due to constantly switching settings, CoD can't really establish someone as iconic as Master Chief. Which is probably why the devs on Vanguard went for some pseudo Avengers-style characters, even if it doesn't really work for WW2.
Master Chief works and has become iconic because he's in almost every Halo, has a unique, distinct, and easily recognizable design, and it probably doesn't hurt that Halo games don't come out every year, so they don't all blur together.
I remember when my grandpa told me about the horrors of World War 2, people getting stabbed with sledgehammers, the conflict between My Team, and Enemy Team, fighting against Attack on Titan characters, drum mag Garands, and other horrifying things.
And not forget about the red dots
Mine told me about the demons he worked with to stop an angry German guy and another demon
@@howtohow8686 and don’t forget about the guys who were *BUILDING THE BRIDGE!!!*
At least he was led by the great General Snoop Dogg.
@@howtohow8686 wait wait wait, wait a moment, no, that can't be right, there are no red dots in this game, there are only.............
Y E L L O W D O T S
“No new CoD in 2023”
Well, fuck. That didn’t age well.
aged like milk
and its worse than vanguard
@@MysticalHaloV2 Imagine telling a Call of Duty fan who's currently in the year 2011 that the undisputed worst game in the franchise will be a Modern Warfare game. He wouldn't believe you. I went in thinking that MWIII was going to be pretty good, on par with MWII, and then I got kicked in the teeth by this shoddy excuse for a _DLC_ that cost 70 clams. How far has CoD fallen that a Modern Warfare title is currently being lampooned as the worst game yet?
@@brendansage6876I am loving Cold War :)
That's dlc
The biggest turn off for me was when they brought out the “historically accurate” claim. That’s when I knew I had to bring out the popcorn and watch the shitstorm
Yeah , WITH ANIME SKINS 🤣
The worst idea you can have is to have an sjw as a writer on a historical game.
@@darthconquerus
But were The germans Red, or soviets?
Reminds me of Battlefield V
Hello Liquid Chris.
The moment the writers said COD had no "iconic" characters yet. I was ACTIVELY rooting for this game to fail. I want it to fail just to spite the writers.
CoD has iconic characters, just not ✨iconic✨ characters.
@@camarokidbb4347 Soap trusted you, and Price thought he could too.
@@camarokidbb4347 They don't represent. They don't exist.
@@anonymousapproximation8549 Sarcasm is a bitch to portray in an online comment. >_
@@camarokidbb4347 Is that why Makarov knows you?
honestly, with how powerful modern consoles are and the large budget these companies have, there's no reason we can't large scale, multi-front campaigns and multiplayer like WaW. Show us events gaming rarely does like the Chinese front or Soviet invasion of Finland. People aren't necessarily over ww2, they're over the low effort and generic depiction of it.
100% true. We're sick of seeing this cookie cutter type shit everytime there's a ww2 game released.
Give us something unique and something unforgetable, something not taught in schools. More then anything, give us the fun that we've deprived for in the last couple years in the Call Of Duty franchise.
It’s out of laziness 100%, nothing to do with technical limitations of consoles/PC lol
Just look at fifa mate. Could have graphics like Ride 2 but they dont bother
I would kill a man or 100 for a game set in the sino-japanese war
Just play Hell Let Loose for your WW2 experience. Stop with this Call of Duty bullshit
There's a pretty anachronistic oversight in dialogue in one mission, during the Australian mission when an soldier yells "RPG!" Which wouldn't make sense because the term RPG wouldn't have been coined until the 60's when RPG's were actually invented, and Bazooka's in WW2 weren't even considered RPG's they were recoiless rifles.
I mean a flashbang appeared in the beginning so……
They didn't give a shit about anything when making Vanguard, did they?
the “My Team” and “Enemy Team” thing genuinely makes me laugh. the more i think about how stupid it is, the more it makes me laugh. it’s comedically awful
When cod mobile at least have squad names
They literally threw out Historical context and just went with generic tribalism.
@@bobby45825 sounds like real life right now
I don't get it thought. They have the Nazis in the main campaign already but can't in multiplayer? Kind of sense does that make lol
@@MistahJay7 I think its because you can play as Nazis, which somebody somewhere at some point got upset about
I'm so glad that they got the historical accuracy on point for this COD game. I remember reading in history textbooks that the guy from Attack on Titan was witnessed t-bagging soldiers on the beaches of Normondy.
@@Mr_Bunk I found the joke to be funny, so you're entire comment is debunked you bozo.. You're so triggered and mad lmaoo
@@Mr_Bunk found the guy who makes college history textbooks
@@Mr_Bunk Seething so hard right now
@@Mr_Bunk Okay, oh great speaker of truth.
@@Mr_Bunk
*r/wooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooosh*
I can just imagine a grandfather talking to his grandson like “We were pinned down by the enemy, we didn’t know what they looked like why they were fighting or even who they were, but none of that mattered because we were pretty sure they might possibly have been the enemy AND THAT’S ALL WE NEEDED TO KNOW
This idea that video games are a direct substitute for historical education is a fucking stupid one, and I just wish people would cut it out. This game will never harm historical education, no matter how shitty it is.
@@Mr_Bunk I agree with you. It's a fucking game
So basically every war but especially this one? Everyone gets called a nazi
Oh I’m Sowwy for hurting your freewings by twying to be funny here I’ll give you a special snowflake award, I’m not sure if you understand the concept of humour I’m literally pointing out the fact that a game set in the Second World War lacked enough confidence to even have countries fighting each other, It was never stated that this would be harmful to historical education nor was it implied
So next time think before you type you inept Troglodyte
@@Aquatic-Male man this looks like a big cringe post hahahahaha bro take your adderall
Full disclosure I don't play FPS games. My only experience is with RPGs. But I watched this entire video. I didn't understand all the terminology 100% of the time but I honestly found this fascinating and very entertaining. Apparently more entertaining than the actual game lol. Thank you for all your hard work Act man, you are so passionate and I appreciate your dedication to gaming! Newbie sub!
Late question but do you play JRPGs like Final Fantasy or Western RPGs like The Elder Scrolls and Fallout? I like both JRPGs and Western RPGs, hell Fallout 3 is my favorite game of all time IMO
A good starting FPS game is Call of Duty World at War, The Half Life series or maybe Team Fortress 2.
@@fireflythe7 team fortress 2 barely teaches you ANYTHING
The half-life series would be the best candidate
I don’t even play Vanguard. I’m just here because I love Act Man’s humor when he critiques a game’s quality.
Edit: wow…1k+ likes and a heart from Acting Male himself…I can die a happy man at this point.
Edit: heart got removed. I can’t die happily.
I played 20 mins of it and I thought
"Oh Act Mans gonna have alot to say"
I would assume most of us are doing the same
I watched this to see what the hell Activision fucked up this time
Same
Same
The being offended gag was hilarious "the nazis should be called the enemy team" - A+
Didn't think we will defend Nazis but here we are in this day of age. I guess we can't call them enemies of the free world.
This was more fun than playing the actual game. Thanks for the amount of effort you put into this.
Ripping your toenails out and dipping them in salt would be more fun than playing this game.
I agree to this . Luckily I get rid of this piece of s*** .
I absolutely agree
Yes daddy your right
Man you guys are pathetic
Forget building a bridge. They didn't even build a FUCKING GAME
Don’t hate on ww2
@@RickColeman_M3terrible game good campaign
CoD Devs: "there are no Remembered / good characters"
Reznov: "we've been forgotten, abandoned in Vorkuta (CoD studio's desk that nobody has touch since CoD BO2) but we will be remember, by those who know us."
"Though the flags may be different, the methods are still the same."
@@Jules279 lol respect +
@@starsjosephfrost Who knew he would predict every cod after BO2 and even AW?
@@Jules279 I have no idea (maybe he's from the future, the twist)
[Petrenko, Reznov, Soap, Price, Ghost, Shepherd, Makarov, Menendez, Woods, and Mason hated that.]
“This game will teach an entire generation that grandpa stormed Normandy with a f-cking EOTech.” -Brandon Herrera
Pretty much everything I hate about this game is summed up by this quote.
You got other issues at hand if you get your facts from an Xbox game. Dumbest thing I ever heard
Ayyy. Nice
@@megami215 Most people don't even know what makes a fact, *a fact.*
You forgot swastikas didn’t exist and there was black female nazis lol
@@megami215 good thing misconceptions have never been spread through fictional books or movies, especially about ww2!
Cod Vanguard is the gaming equivalent of sleeping pills
That and eating a pufferfish.
But with Sleeping pills you get your moneys worth…
Melatonin about to go bankrupt
@@Carlisho melatonin about to skyrocket
The games quite fun, lol but you believe whatever this whiner says
It's funny that Wolfenstein the new collossus is more historically accurate than this and they don't censor swastika for no reason
Just don’t mention the game okay for everyone’s sake including mine
This is a crazy take bro
The fact that ghosts is getting brought up is proof how badly this series has fallen yet again.
And still every year people seem to be hyped as fuck for the next one. That is until day 1 after launch, then it's shit again and you find urself playing a older cod instead of the one you were hyped about.
Yet again? Never recovered after ghosts to be honest
@@Sacciuiguai never recovered after mw3
@@MrSp3ctre The disrespect to BO2.
@@MrSp3ctre modern warfare 3 was dogshit compared to black ops 1 2 and modern warfare 2
In the campaign, when you were in the train, looking at the box and they threw a flash bang at you. Flash bangs weren’t invented until the 1960s by the British
Activisiom/Sledgehammer/Treyarch: "Yes, you see, everytime you see details like that, a wizard did it"
neither did red dots that didn't stop them
And, thanks to MGS3, I know that the Flashbang was made to be a "training grenade". Once the S.A.S. realized the uses of "Stun Grenades", they started to spam the fuck out of it. And they still do it! And so does every other country's special forces.
yeah that would probably be a grenade and everyone would have been dead by then
@@johnnyg4mer764 god I love that game
"I'm surprised treyarch managed to even include a scoreboard"
*Meanwhile in 2042....*
You got the joke. Good job.
The only Treyarch games I play are World at War and Black Ops 1 and 2.
And Battlefield 1943 is the best game.
So for those who are wondering initially Vanguard was not going to feature a zombies bonus mode at all as Treyarch was thrown into development only 6 months before release, however due to Treyarchs reputation and Activision threatening higher ups they conceded only 10 weeks prior to release and developed a very shoddy zombies game mode. The kicker is due to Vanguards (for once) unique take on the engine Cold War could NOT be used as a basis and Zombies had to be made from the ground up in just 10 weeks. This is the reason for so many features missing in the mode.
Source
@@fafanir82 I am an employee at Treyarch :p
@@mistermittens3533real
At least the “Zombies” name fits.
No functioning organs; just skin.
fucking gottem
I can truly say that the game has only gone down hill since we lost Verdansk... They have atleast cut down on some of the hackers in the Warzone lobbies... Well said brother.
1. It's been downhill since ghosts.
2. Hackers feel better than ever. You have even soft cheaters like Zlaner making a living. It's messed up.
They made cheat makers and cheat players, millionaires...
@@mozan33r71 they sure did.
since the cold war intergration
Source? "I made it up, bro"
@@rvolmed74 What's your agenda?
That interview with the lady saying CoD has no memorable characters is just a sad reminder that the people who make important design decisions in games don't actually play them... which more often than not just translates to a game that is just out of touch with what made the series great originally, trend/profit chasing, and just disappoints existing fans entirely
Not only that, they don't care about the history, the entire story isn't even accurate, the "bloodiest war" isn't even shown to be bloody, the characters too are bland, no historical figures also shown.
Even as someone whose experience with CoD is only with WaW and BO3, I can say that she's just wrong. Price and Reznov come to mind.
*frank woods crying in a corner for "not being memorable"*
I haven't played a CoD campaign since BLOPS 1 and I can still remember at least 4-5 standout characters from MW1, MW2 and Black Ops 1. My cheeks are there no memorable characters lmao
Man even ghosts had Roarke
I hate cod vanguard as a historian. The STG44 firing mechanism is located in its stock, so how can you remove the stock and still fire the gun?! Gay German soldiers, heavy racism in the British army, and cursed weapons modification. It just insults history.
Don't ask Activision what the Nazis did to the one LGBT progressive clinic in Germany.
Dont forget guns in the wrong theatres, like Japanese guns on german trains or German guns in the Pacific
Not to mention the fact that you can just entirely remove the stock off of the MG42 and somehow the recoil spring doesn’t fall out of the gun.
Racism in the. British army.. Or any other.. Makes actual sense it's the 20th century.. But them making the British army... The German one.. Yeah agreed.. Wtf
If it was the US Marines, the cursed weapon modifications would've at least made sense, given what the Marines did in ww2.
Literally made a machine gun using parts from 3 separate guns.
Activision needs to give this franchise a break. They can’t milk their cash cow any drier than this.
Imo they should just remaster cods from waw to bo2
Apparently there is no cod coming out next year. Hopefully that means we get a finished game the year after.
@@joshhollands7504 Hopefully
what
Title: Why is Vanguard so bad
Me: hmm yes.... the floor is made of floor
I'd like to add something onto this, Vanguard's "new" KotH-type mode was already done in DOOM 2016's multiplayer and there it was called Warpath, they legitimately just pulled it out of a better game.
Halo 5 had Roaming King as well by 2016
gears of war has had koth, and its been one of its most popular game modes, since its inception back in 2005.
@@poeskey but did the hill move? Combat Evolved had KoTH in 2001 👀
Ha! I was wondering if anyone else thought of that!
man doom's multiplayer is fun, I've enjoyed it alot. unless of course you come across some script kiddie who spams their rocket launcher at 600 RPM
This guy is so spot on with cod it’s scary… the scarier part is, the devs won’t listen to him and continue to make the same crap over and over again.
the real scary part is, stupid clients are going to buy all of it! over and over again...
@@Nero-tz9jh Apathy is death - Devs
The definition of insanity - the consumers
@@Nero-tz9jh The scariest fact of them all.
yeah and the only new gd mode is just payload without the payload its just a flag
@@nate88888 war mode in ww2 was awesome storming the beach was fun if had the waw look and feel it would've been a winner
Fun fact: the recoil spring in the STG 44 continues into the butt stock removing the butt stock in anyway will make the STG 44 unable to fire
Hugo Schmeisser: look how they massacred my boy
Wouldn't it be have to be manually cocked?
I mean this as a dig at Activision and not The Act Man:
It was genuinely hard to finish this video because at certain points I couldn't stand to listen and see some things that aren't/are in my once beloved Call of Duty
I had to come back 3 different times just cause the zombies and multi-player were so mind numbing
@Gabriel Contreras definitely not. Dead means you literally can’t find a lobby.
The long awaited sequel to
“Why is COD WW2 so BAD?!”
At least cod ww2 is playable and fun. Yeah it’s so bad but it’s nowhere near vanguard standards. Cod ww2 is better than vanguard.
@@CalixtoGarciaIniguez1898 yeah at least that game was somewhat playable. This is fucking boring af
@@Nebulasecura literally. Nazi Zombies in cod ww2 is ten times better than vanguard zombies.
@@CalixtoGarciaIniguez1898 We thought we had it bad back then 🤣
@@VanLupen for real lmao
Props to you for sitting through a game that doesn’t deserve anyones time
Honestly I enjoy cold war more lol
I take no shame in putting so many hours into it
Hopefully the revenue from this video can heal the pain he went through
@@TheJoviLovi it’s fun compared to the newer cods but sometimes sweats can ruin the game
I’d rather watch the Dragonball live action than play through this game.
If the Act Man didn't make a review on this game, I honestly wouldn't be mad. I haven't played it but the footage I've seen convinces me I made the right call.
“No new Call Of Duty for 2023!”
Yeah… about that, here’s a little project we been doing in our spare time: MW3
F in chat for good zombie experience 😞
F
It hasn’t been really good since bo3
@@Crimson06 cold war zombies was fun imo
F
But hopefully with the Microsoft acquisition they can restructure the company and may bring out a half decent COD for once. Either that or they will end up pulling a Rareware and self destruct. Could really go either way as far as I see it.
F
@@younglord161 I agree although it was my first zombie experience.
Ah yes, I remember my grandpa telling me about a guy who used 10000% aim assist to take down an entire Japanese battalion.
History is so crazy like that.
That sucks. Frickin autoaim in the 40's. Hey, was your grandpa in my team of the enemy team?
You can't tell me that the dentist who killed 90 Japanese soldiers so his friends could retreat, who was found dead Borimir style in a pile of corpses, wasn't using hacks
And the dude was shot and stabbed by bayonets up to 26 times while still being alive.
This is not real "Aim assist" Is not a real thing. In real life you would have to aim weapon like with your eyes, not "aim assist"
@@Fartsmellahashsella I remember it like it was yesterday. D-day.. Storming the beach was insane. The anime, the green blue and red bullets flying around that sand? Damn it was crazy. I was also the only white guy on my boat, rest were indian, russian and british women with these Japanese weapons. It was a day that I will never forget.
Definitely one of the worst regimes in history, the enemy team, is really well portrayed in this game by showing the atrocities committed against the my team
It really shows great respect to the victims of the war crimes of Enemy Leader and Enemy Team
Yeah. Those guys make Team Evil look like a joke
Luckily we have my leader who can lead us to my team’s victory.
Anyone who got a problem with my team is a racist bigot.
It's weird, I need answers. In multiplayer, it's my team versus enemy team, but in single player, I'm playing as enemy team. So... is it supposed to be symbolic that we are all the same? That war... War never changes?
One cashgrabby method they used is weapon blueprints. Like Act Man said, the attachments give you a severe advantage against other players. So blueprints basically say: “would you rather grind 10 hours for good attachments or spend your hard earned money” it also takes away the feeling that you at least earned that attachment you wanted and grinned for.
It’s hilarious that people want Activision to stop making CoD an annual release when it’s clear that it makes them more money not to do that. CoD isn’t the cash cow, the customers are.
People are just so goddamn stupid sometimes. It's the same thing over and over again
Dumbass:
gets excited about the new cod
Buys cod on release date
Gets angry because it's trash
Gets excited about to cod again
Buys cod again on release date
Gets angry because its trash
Gets excited about cod again
Like WHY DO YOU KEEP BUYING IT THEN!!!
That’s the funny thing, NONE OF THESE MODERN GREEDY BUSINESS PRACTICES WERE EVER NEEDED!!
They became legends because they put TIME and CARE into the classics, and guess what? THEY STILL MADE BIG BUCKS!! It’s almost like these greedy pigs don’t need every penny on the planet or something!
Heck I’ll double down and say that they could pay their employees…and get ready for this crazy idea…a living wage :0!!!
@@ramenbomberdeluxe4958 a living wage?! do you want the ceo's to sell their yachts you monster?!
@@organicleaf Oh yeah, and I’ll make them have to buy million dollar mansions instead of billion dollar mansions too! Muahahahahahaaaaa!!
@@ramenbomberdeluxe4958 You monster! what next??? Are you gonna build a bridge to their houses?! You are a devil
Activison CEO: looks like they like it
Fans: we hate it
CEO: they like it
explains the sexual assault
@@naenaemister5048 r/cursedcomments
The fact that of all things they recycle they dont recycle wonder weapons LOL
@@spectroelectro3772 this ain't reddit
@@randomperson6004 r/yes
Spend 40 min. watching The Act Man talking about this game is far more enjoyable than playing an actual game.
This video honestly has more replay value than the actual game 😂😂 and that’s facts
fuck man, at least I feel something by watching the video
Same here, The Last Jedi and The Last of Us Part 2 have given me more entertainment value from video essays about how bad they are than they have by themselves
Same with blame truth’s videos
the thumbnail is also funny and more enjoyable than the actual game lmao
“Let’s go no game in 2023! Modern warfare 3 is behind me isn’t it.”
I like how the zombies portal isn't even unique, it's straight up just a re-colored version of the one from Cold War
Thats not sledge hammers fault. Thats treyarches.
Wanna know something cool? There are still assets from COD2 in Black Ops 3, and probably Vanguard as well. Every COD game they share the new stuff with the other studios their library is insanely huge at this point. COD1 used some Return to Castle Wolfenstein assets but then with COD2 they forked the idtech 3 engine and put all their own assets. Oh here's another one- You know when you go to a door in Zombies and it says "This door is opened elsewhere..."? That script is leftover in the engine all the way back from Quake 1 circa 1996
its true
Yeah and that animation is actually from BO3. They really need to chill with the teleporting shit in zombies, it was cool when it was only between two related locations, not two random areas like a german city and shi no numa??
B2 , he never said shg was to blame or that. He just made an observation. Pretty simple.
The fact that the man the myth the legend himself MrRoflWaffles, is literally begging people not to buy a game because of how bad zombies is truly shows off how terrible modern gaming has destroyed the entire gaming genre
@T-Army Multiplayer is solid and the campaign is really good you should get it if you get it cheap or just wait for mw2
@T-Army I missed bo1 so much I just had to buy it again for my old ps3 man that game is so good
@@Sprunkzz yeah as well as bo2 multiplayer is modded asf but zombies is still fun to play
"how did these get passed quality assurance?"
Simple Activision fired them asking for raises so the playerbase have become the testers 😂
I sincerely believe that they haven’t had a quality assurance department for at least a decade.
As someone who works in QA I bet any money they were logged by QA but was considered "not blocking release" or put as "will fix after launch".
plus they know game will sell regardless because there is stupid people out there, i tapped out of COD ages ago because games are same thing over and over again, they get lazy each time
They have no QA department
I had a friend who did QA for the game, he told them about the issue and they ignored it.
"Heres a sentence that i will never be saying again: i'd rather play Ghosts"
MW3 2023: say it again
“Call of Duty’s base design is based on addiction, not enjoyment.” Bro, You couldn’t have said that any better
Literally a perfect summary of the situation.
Yeah… And honestly most AAA games nowadays. With the loot boxes of old being replaced with something else…
This is so true, I remember going back to MW19 after a 5month break and I felt dirty. It felt like a relapse
@@samuelault4723 lmfao
Well yes but addicting things are usually fun.. call of duty has been neither addicting nor fun since black ops 3. That was the last decent cod spite the futuristic stuff.
Whats more Ironic is the fact that more recently there was a news article that said that Vanguard failed because “No one likes WW2”
The fact that activision needs to blame fans instead of making an actually good game is laughable at best
Honestly they should just stop making WW2 games if it is to disrespect it
Correct. WW2 based games aren't the problem; It's the fact that 80-90% of all WW2 games almost exclusively focus on the Western Front loaded with cliches, cardboard characters, and Hollywood style action sequences. In other words, WW2 games aren't the problem; It's how generic and cliche most of them are.
Ain't nothing wrong with WW2, Purposely making a bad game to make a crappy none point is tho.
@@ananastudio No, don't be a clown you realise real vets worked alongside MOH which the OG cod devs came from? You realise this genre started because they wanted to teach a whole new generation about this conflict hence so many movie scenes being in these games aswell. It isn't disrespectful at all quite the opposite. Unless movies and shows are also disrespectful?
@@dragonbornexpress5650 I mean this genre took off and really started with Spielberg hence the movie clichés even with cod but guess what those games where successful the current lot aren't what does that tell ya? This I think rubbish ain't it chief.
Two things I learned after watching this video.
1: Apathy is death.
2: THE ENEMY IS BUILDING A BRIDGE!!!1!1!
sToP tHe eNemy FROM BUILDING THAT BRIDGEEEEE
Haha 😆
@@Xbxbbxbdbdxbxbbx THEY’RE BUILDING A BRIDGE!!!!!111!1!!!1!1!!1
Worse than death
And War
The thing about Cold War was they found a perfect operator system: there were operators, but they were exclusive to a specific side. They still had skins, but there wasn’t an operator on your team and an enemy operator with the same skin on the other.
MW 2019 actually did the same thing; Even had multiple sub-factions between the main mega-factions.
The flash bang they got hit by shouldn’t have existed in WW2. It didn’t get developed until the 60’s and wasn’t officially used until the 70’s so the technological inaccuracies go beyond intentional. Either that or they were too lazy to think of an alternate scenario.
I don't play games for historical accuracy but either way this game is boring ahahaha
I didn’t play the campaign but that seemed like a very one way area
Just cover that area, or kill them with a frag
There’s also holographic sights LMAO
@@andrewgallegos290 i agree that a game does'nt have to be 100% historical accurate , but at leaste they need to be beliavable ,and vanguard isnt beliavable.
@@hd5783 a revolver shotgun with detachable mags lmao.
Not to be a picky player but when I played the campaign, I noticed in the Pacific airfield portion the Japanese were using StG 44s and Lugers? Around 1943??
It baffles me because the Japanese weapons are available in multiplayer…game was rushed af.
World at War was and always will be the best Pacific campaign I’ve played.
There was a historian watching the gameplay and commenting on it and a LOT of the weapons were either in the wrong time, at the completely wrong place or both. You could find a german hunting shotgun in the japanese mission. You could find STG 44s before it even was 44, you could reload panzerfausts which were one time use ... You could even find the Volkssturmgewehr, which was in service about 2-3 months before the end of the war. WaW did the weapons right, you could find respective weapons only when they made sense. The FG42 in seelow heights e.g. was correctly placed, because the seelow height battle actually featured a german paratrooper unit.
I'm playing world at war right now and damn it, they could just remaster It and never touch anything that don't need to be fixed,.except the mp40 damage
@@Sliiiiicedcheese and FG42 damage, 4 shots to kill with what is an instakill in SP??
@@kayas7574 I never noticed the FG 42 ,I never got to try in MP, only zombies and campaign, it seems good
@@Sliiiiicedcheese it is probably the worst weapon for mp, sure firerate and very managable recoil but damage sucks and damage dropoff is even worse :/
It always astounds me how AAA titles have like zero scope when it comes to WWII, even after over 20 years of the genre being around. Like literally have a conflict that spanned for 6 years on almost every continent of the world, but if you ask a activision employee the conflict took place from 1942 to 1944 in France and Russia. Activision had the balls to let you play as a mass shooter almost 15 years ago, but they still don't have the balls to let you play as the Germans in a cod campaign.
same with not having a swastika any more and only having the iron cross, because that's apparently "offensive." So if you're able to play a game rated M for "mature", why is some logo on a flag going to offend you? COD used to be so good, the last good COD game was black ops, which came out in 2010, and actually had swastikas in zombies. Everything now is a bunch of woke garbage. They're definitely was black women enlisted as US Marines storming an island in the south pacific killing Japanese soldiers... totally.
@@internetuser8371 Yah, the irony of the entire thing is really palpable, ever since "the nuke" in cod 4, cods thing has been being edgy and going for shock value. 5 you got to see serious war crimes committed by all sides, MWII you had the airport massacre, black ops you had the reznov twist, etc, somewhere along the way though they became a lot more politically conscious but at the same time tried to keep the edginess and gritiness of the past games, so the entire thing just becomes a convoluted cringy mess as a result.
I would love if they just went back to the basics of like the first 3 COD games and just dropped the plot and even characters for that matter, and just had you play through set pieces that actually happened during the war and that we have never got to see, like playing as the finnish during the winter war, or the poles trying desperately to fend off the german blitzkrieg (and then later playing as free polish forces in italy) or how about you follow a group of german soldiers from barborrosa and show everything gradually go to shit for them. The possibilities are literally endless, but we only see the same recycled stuff again and again. EA was "slightly" better with battlefield I guess, featured norway and a tiny section where you were able to play as a tiger tank crew.
@@internetuser8371 it's just bullshit. The swastika was everywhere in Wolfenstein and nobody cared.
It's even more baffling how they keep portaying the red scum as "the good guys".
I've always wanted to have the German perspective
I watched this after your 2023 "MW3" expansion pack video... and oh man I wish I could travel into the past and talk to you
What I really want, is a vietnam vod game with a campaign that doesn't have an uplifting ending. The shit we have all heard about Vietnam is GRIM. I wanna see that on display. And for it to basically have a similar message to WaW ending with the 60M people dead. That war is bad, horrific, and even if it's over, the horror doesn't leave you.
I think that'd be pretty fun
@@bigbargemarge7675 "But where can we get all the microtransactions and bullshit skins to fit in and the whole niche weapon meta to exist?!?!/!1?1/?!/1?!?!1/!??!??!!??"-Retarded Executives in Activision, probably.
I’ve always wanted a cod Vietnam game that wasn’t like cod ww2
That would be amazing a more bitter story line would probably hit the feels.
And maybe Korean as well
It's really astounding to me that the same studio that made Black Ops 2 worked on Vanguard
Same studio but not the same people sadly
Bo1>bo2
Sledgehammer made vanguard not treyarch
@@jaydennoodles4682 treyarch did the zombies
Well the developers of those games were fired
You know, the saddest thing about Vanguard is that, according to early leaks, they were _originally_ going for a Wolfenstein-esque aesthetic of an alternate history where the Axis won WWII, but changed their minds at some point.
And do you know why that would be? Could it have been to be more accurate to WWII? Could it have been because they believed it to be somewhat disrespectful to history? Nope.
It’s because they need the game to tie in narratively to World at War, Black Ops and Modern Warfare for Warzone. You can’t have an alternate history where the Axis won because you can’t do that without the MW and BO timelines being broken. They’re trying to do, like, a fucking Call of Duty cinematic universe with all their games now by connecting it together, and it just limits their options and dilutes the story.
Ironically, even with Vanguard at launch, there was no connection to any of the previous games including Cold War and MW 2019, so then it begs the question: What was even the point of going for a big connected universe if your own game doesn't connect to that universe?
@@dragonbornexpress5650 *These people are fucking dumb*
Like, shouldn't they have started WITH the WW2 scenario first _BEFORE_ going into Cold War times, and THEN a Modern Warfare time!?
@@dragonbornexpress5650and then mwii has an alternate timeline
wolfenstien was better
@@cymikgaming1266 I... I think that's a given.
My Grandfather barely made it out of Okinawa alive. He was in the middle of building a bridge under heavy Enemy Team fire, when a member of the Enemy Team ran up and stabbed him with a sledgehammer. He barely survived and now has a crippling fear of sledgehammers to this day.
It's crazy how something that was supposed to be cool for us and the devs by making us able to get more content just turned into "let's see the worst thing we can put out that people will still buy"
Activision 🤝 Game Freak
@@classicsteakZ096 Game Freak at least puts care into their games.... you might not notice cause you're too bust on your high fucking horse over Techinical issues that can always be fixed
@@Sonichero151 I mean, as of recent this is true. The story is always good, but it's everything else that feels bad to play.
@@theoneandonlyjim902I played Pokémon violet and I can tell you that the main problem with the game is the performance. the gameplay is fun, the new Pokémons are good, and there’s a lot you can do in the game.
@@SheerDruid81 Performance? The voice acting or like the Switch not being able to handle the game play?
The one thing I love about The Act Man's Reviews there is NO HOLDING BACK. Just the Detail of Information he goes into every aspect I respect the Grind.
I take no prisoners, comrades
@@TheActMan good man
Unless the game is made by Amazon...
@@TheActMan Yo what are you’re thoughts on Rdr2 online
Except when it came to Infinite not only did he barely point out flaws but he knowingly lied through his teeth and his "follow-up" was a joke as well. Dude got paid to hype infinite plain and simple and if he didn't he's a fanboy of the worst kind
One of the less talked about evils of CoD Vanguard is having an American storyline in the campaign, but only allowing the player to use two US weapons (the M1911 and M1 Flamethrower) even though the US firearms were arguably some of the coolest in WWII.
Also, I like how Sledgehammer included Jackson on the team because he was a master fighter pilot, but then made him do missions on the ground as a grunt (because apparently the most skilled commando the US had at the time also just so happens to be the most skilled pilot as well). Not to mention the ludicrous notion that the US and Soviet Russia would agree to send their best soldier to fight on a team behind enemy lines rather than keeping them to use on their own fronts.
And one last thing. Sledgehammer had the 93rd Infantry Division rescue the pilot once his plane was shot down by the Japanese to score brownie points from people who only care about whether or not the game is inclusive. The problem is the 93rd really only did construction work and occasionally played a defensive role during the war, yet they’re portrayed as being part of like a tank battalion. I get the feeling Sledgehammer just Googled, “all black unit wwii,” and picked the first result that came up without doing any actual research. Not to mention that the 93rd weren’t even at Bougainville during the time the story was set (nor were StG-44s for that matter).
If they gave a shit, they could’ve done a storyline about the 761st Tank Battalion “the Black Panthers,” who fought with General Patton during the Battle of the Bulge rather than a construction unit to give the illusion of inclusiveness. But then they couldn’t boast about the campaign including all fronts of the war in their marketing I guess.
@Samuellee Ogboko Jr Yeah, my bad. Thank God for the troops on “My Team” who fought and died to protect the free world from the “Enemy Team.”
@@spaceman624 That wouldn’t happen to be Big Red One would it? I vaguely remember that game and believe there was a mission set during the Battle of the Bulge.
@Samuellee Ogboko Jr “We’re not sure why we were fighting men on Enemy Team. We knew nothing of their culture or their motivations. All we knew was that they stood for everything that we didn’t marching under the banner of a plus sign.”
-An unnamed soldier of the Second “My Team” Expeditionary Force
@Samuellee Ogboko Jr my team...
Everything woke always turns to shit.
I stopped playing when during the Japanese missions you could pick up STGs and MG-42s off Japanese soldiers. How unbelievably stupid do you have to be to put the wrong guns in the wrong theater
I stopped when I saw the modern tacticool reload animations in a ww2 game, oh and that bullshit you mentioned.
I love that act man has come to appreciate and enjoy the complex zombies maps, especially considering the amount of content they could really add, and seeing how vanguard just never captured what made zombies so fun
I remember a quote Act Man brought up from his World at War review:
"A true war story is never moral. It does not instruct, nor encourage virtue, nor suggests models of proper human behavior, nor restrain men from doing the things men have always done. If a story seems moral, do not believe it. If at the end of a war story you feel uplifted, or if you feel that some small bit of recititude has been salvaged from the larger wastes, then you have been made the victim of a very old and terrible lie."
- Time O'Brien, The Things They Carried.
@@pootisengage6672 tell em king
You finished half of the quote but good one.
@@pootisengage6672 yeah germany was bad in it's history. not all people though. keep that in mind. tere were those that actively were against the Nazis and those that were against them, but scared because even just saying something against the governemt could get you killed. and then you had those that were completely on board with the ideology.
@@pootisengage6672 idk man you wanting an entire race of people wiped out sounds kinda nazi to me…
@@jlag96 after what they did? Oh no my friend. It would have been reckoning
COD Vanguard: selling stuff they did not even finish.
Words of a genius, Act Man I salute you.
This game is a straight insult to Gamers everywhere
and historians as well
@@Crom_Apsotle based
The vanguard grenade emote where the guy has his hands on his head is the exact same emote from Junkrat. They are not only recycling shit from older cods but they are also recycling from their other games.
i wish they'd at least draw inspiration from their GOOD games
😆 🤣 😂 😹
🤣
I like how the campaign's death quotes are from the in game characters, making said quotes meaningless
I think I'll just play [PROTOTYPE] . It's another Activision franchise which I think you should to try.
What you on about?
Polina saying "ppl die" is the most inspirational shit in COD history
@@shamoonmarwat9840 best part of prototype, you don't even need a pc from heaven to run it.
Activision should bring back Prototype and make Prototype 3
"We are out of Nazis"
Wow when I saw this quote, I laugh so hard. It is hilariously so bad like bruh this woman is trying to act like Blazkowicz
It's astonishing how technology has advanced in the last decade, yet Call of Duty titles continue to come out on a yearly cycle with less and less innovation each time.
Gildorf aka bootleg Gandalf what's new since 2013 we know this do you.
Accretion fatigue has been plaguing the franchise for almost a decade.
Innovation? Bruh they doesnt provide even bare minimum
I like your point despite being a non-sequitur
@@soulbrother5435 facts
“Call of duty’s game design is based on addiction, not enjoyment”… I couldn’t agree more, which is why I kicked the habit a couple years ago.
Brandon Herrera’s “cursed guns of COD Vanguard” is sooo damn accurate. You can legit turn a weapon into a completely different weapon…just by using the attachments…
When Jonathan Ferguson of the British Royal Armories did a video on the weapons, I think the poor guy nearly had an aneurysm.
@@dragonace119 please give me a link to that vid
@@NotKameron Look up Gamespot : "Firearms Expert Reacts To Call Of Duty: Vanguard’s Guns" he's a very frequent guest on that channel but he also part of the channel "Royal Armories" where he and other meusem staff show off and go over the history of certain weapons.
@@dragonace119 thanks
@@NotKameron No problemo.
gaming is the only industry where selling an unfinished product is considered "normal"
It's like serving burgers laced with E.coli halfway cooked before it's even finished.
I wouldn't call it normal,but it is accepted and that's worse
@@badasscrusader i woudn't even consider it accepted. people are just, for lack of better words, desperate enough to buy the new game since it's new and something to play, only to learn that it's terrible. problem is the companies already made their money, so to them, everything is fine since the met their sale numbers. theeen they learn people will buy anything, so the least amount of effort is put in knowing it'll sell because people want the newest installment. then the cycle repeats itself.
Movies also kinda fall into this. Just take a look at Justice League. Clearly unfinished.
@ERROR 422 yea that's not a good thing
Fallout 76 is good now,years after its release.it should have been like this at release
22:30
The Acting Male : "How does stuff like this get past quality assurance ???"
Activision : _"Bold of you to assume that we even have a department for Quality Assurance"_
I do like that moniker for the Performing Penis-haver
Even if they did it would be to much work :)
I can’t believe it’s taken consumers this long to realize how stale and repetitive Cod’s formula is, what with each game releasing every year. I gave up on Cod by the time I’d played Advanced Warfare. My third cod game.
The same I question I asked regarding Battlefield Bad Company 2 and Battlefield 4's Singleplayer Campaign difficulties being all the same. The number of hits it takes to die on Easy, is exactly the same as it is on Hard.
We need a cod game set in vietnam with multiple characters, kinda like vanguard, like 1 person who is a marine FORECON, another person who is a MACV-SOG operator, a Green Beret, and an Army Ranger. The story would basically be set in 4 different areas, one in Tay Ninh, one in Khe Sanh, one in Hue City, and one in Da Nang. The MACV-SOG operator will be in Khe Sanh and Da Nang, the FORECON will be in Khe Sanh and Da Nang, The Green Beret will be in Tay Ninh and Khe Sanh, and the army ranger will be at Tay Ninh and Hue City.
When a franchise reaches a point where it’s just a license to print money the innovation and creativity is always the first to go.
Describes Halo too
There’s been more effort put into this video than vanguard
I put more effort into typing this comment than in vanguard
There's been more effort put into me breathing than Vanguard.
@@maki_zenin-z7t There's been more effort put into anyone existing than shitguard
There’s been more effort being put into vanguard than MWIII
Me taking a sip of water is more complicated than the entire CoD franchise.
That one person who was at the comic con and said that there’s no one you think of when you hear Call of Duty actually shocked me. There’s no way she played any game in the series.
I was playing the Russian mission set in stalingrad. I thought there would be a Reznov or Dimitri easter egg. Because we were about to Kill Steiner. Only to be majorly disappointed because there was not even a nudge or anything about those characters.
To be fair, given her comparison to Master Chief, no, I don't think CoD has anyone who compares to how iconic Master Chief is. Even non-Halo fans know who Master Chief is, CoD doesn't have anyone on that level and that's probably what she meant. Probably.
Though obviously they didn't seem to try that hard with this game either to succeed at that goal...
@@Rawnblade13 Reznov is the only name I recognize and that's just from my brother playing CoD:WaW all the fucking time.
Honestly in general cod is such a huge franchise but doesn't have a mascot at the size of master chief, Lara Croft or really any other similar franchise size. It's probably akin to assassins Creed where Ezio is super popular in its respective fandom but no one outside of it really knows or cares about him.
@@Rawnblade13 That's only because you play as Master Chief in 90 percent of the Halo games And there is like 11 of them. If I can Remember Woods, Mason, Reznov, and Makarov in less time that's impressive writing.
After two matches of vanguard zombies I closed and deleted the application, and hopped on some der eisendrache
Vanguard could have done a storyline where the war didn't end in 1945, and is pushing into the mid '50s, and so the arms technology race progressed even faster than in reality. This would been a probably universally accepted reason for all the weapons attachments, and the spec ops squads being akin to Cold War-era units.
Sadly that takes foresight
Interesting that Fallout kind of went this route in the 50's after WW2 and is what led to the entire nuclear warfare that decimated the world.
@@Deadsea_1993 hey you right! If the CoD want going to Fallout Route is not hard
That reminds me of "Wolfenstein The New Order" and "Turning Point Fall Of Liberty," both of which were alternative history WW2 games.
@Christopher Regan I enjoyed "Turning Point". I do wish it would get a rework; it was blatant how much of a low budget PS3 release game it was.
Here’s a cool idea for a game mode:
Air Raid, one team plays as planes like fighters/bombers, the other plays as the airbase defences, like flak cannons and AA guns, the goal is to capture the airbase by getting C47 style paratroopers for the plane team, and wait for air support for the defence team
Treyach: No cause that would be fun, and we hate FUN
That’s a good idea
💯💯
COD could never. Battlefield does need this tho that'd be a cool mode
@@garbearfar1394 you really think Dice with battlefield is gonna try to put something fun in their game?
Got some water to sell you in the Sahara pal
They've successfully targeted the audience of people who want to play a WW2 game and people who want to play a COD game - Absolutely nobody.
I fit into both those categories, and even I don't wanna play this game. Some of the earlier entries were far superior.
Why hasn’t he done a video on COD4? Out of all the ones he’s made videos for, that one is certainly the most important in the entire franchise.
If I could like a comment 2 times for one time I would choose this one.
“Call Of Duty Vanguard is teaching a whole generation of teenagers that their great grandfathers stormed Normandy with a fucking Eotech”
“If you’re gonna sacrifice some realism to make the game fun, at least have a fun game.”
- Brandon Herrera
Ah yes, I love AK Guy
Bro they put pages of the Holy Quran on the floor with blood all over it.
@@KageTSG Okay?
@@KageTSG ?
@@KageTSG Do you know male cats have a barbed penis?
this sounds like the kind of game I'd play as a super young kid and my older brother would show me the safe zone and we'd feel smart for "outsmarting" the evil zombies
Reminds me of that one room in left 4 dead at the end of mercy hospital campaign
@@montmurillo8291 what room
@randomprecision oh ok thanks
Meanwhile everyone else who’s mastered training, Easter eggs n shit: *laughs in pro*
To be completely honest, when I launched the campaign, I just sat there, looking at how the train moved and the environment just kept repeating itself, as if it was in and endless loop. After 10 minutes of standing on the train doing nothing, I uninstalled the campaign and went straight to multiplayer.
Shit was whack; everything felt like I was playing MW19 with a World War 2 reskin placed on top.
I don't need to talk about the weapons because I don't want to talk about the weapons.
Zombies was...wait, what was that again?
Nah, never mind, It wasn't that important.
Vanguard is, at best, forgettable. I assumed that "return to their roots" meant adding old characters from the very first games as operators, retell their stories and such. Turns out that all we've got are these cringe-worthy "comic book heroes and heroines".
Fuck me.
camn, i really tri'd gettin into vanG. idk im still tryna finish it
At the very least, Its not like they're radio silent, like EA is(and has been so far)with 2042. They fucked up so bad that everything they do or say becomes a PR nightmare.
That's what you get for knowingly rushing and releasing an unfinished product and selling it full price.
If you really want to play Vanguard, stick to Multiplayer.
@@sc1on but the feeling of anarchocristic and painful progression system, decent map design but extremely bland and stale (no authentic) even the fucking grind that Activision force u to stay in this hell aren’t that interesting enough to keep doing the pain so I just say “fuck you, I finally done with your shit and never ever see you again” type of thing.
@@sc1on Or just don’t give Activision money for this actual meme of a game. There are indie games worth 10 or 15 bucks that have a thousand times the soul and content of this game.
@@Phrscv I could, yes. I already do, in fact. Vanguard was a lost cause for me. I only spend money on bundles from past games and the battle pass for every season. I just hope MWII doesn't screw over all the good stuff MW19 had.
My least favorite thing that’s happened with recent cod multiplayer lobbies is you never play with the same lobby twice. It’s new people everytime. I understand why because when people have different modes selected for queue you can’t have them all play TDM if they have four other modes selected. I just wish you could choose single modes and match with other players in those modes and stay in the same lobbies over multiple matches
This game was like WWII given the “Avengers” treatment. Yeah a conflict that witnessed unthinkable horrific acts of pure inhumanity on a global scale accompanied by the 70+ million dead totally deserves the light-hearted team-up Avengers tone adaptation.
By far Call of Duty at its laziest and most pathetic. I’m so happy people are not being kind to the title.
If this "Avengers" wannabe trying to beat the WW2, they should make another using "Justice League" in Korean War, Vietnam or even WW1... If they maked one in the future.
The moment that she said COD had no noteworthy or iconic characters is the moment I knew this campaign was doomed. Though with how ambitious they were going with it (In concept) I kinda adore it, but the execution was not exactly the best.
Sometimes I wonder, “Is cod maybe making their games so bad just so we get a better feeling when they finally decide they should make a good game again?”
@@g2jxGhF5G8z1gL7S maybe the most pessimist devs do that, but the ones who still give a s-it about their work probably still try in some capacity, and SHG is clearly part of the pessimist group who barely tries anymore, but I don’t know if I can blame them considering how bad Activision treats them with the strict deadlines and lack of creative freedom to work in something else (I’m sure they’re sick of CoD at this point)
Sure, set expectations so low that when they decide to meagerly exceed those low expectations, everybody hails it as a masterpiece to cope with their poor purchasing habits.
I feel like it was made so bad so that the backlash could force Activision to give them some breathing room.
No wonder MW19 is so praised.
@@Tyler_W Won't happen, since MW2019 was okay but it was still criticised instead of worshipped, rightfully so of course