Volkswagen Golf 1.5 eTSI Evo MHEV fuel consumption economy in a city - real-life test :: [1001cars]
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 21 ก.ย. 2024
- Here you have the real-life test of fuel consumption (fuel economy) in Volkswagen Golf 8 1.5 eTSI Evo MHEV 2020/2021: 1.5 l R4 turbo-petrol engine with Mild Hybrid system, DSG) in a city (also in heavy traffic). This car has 110 kW (150 HP), 250 Nm, FWD and 7-speed DSG. The same engine you can find in: Skoda Octavia, Seat Leon, Audi A3. Results:
1st test: 4.9 l/100 km (48.0 mpg US / 57.7 mpg UK),
2nd test: 5.0 l/100 km (47.0 mpg US / 56.5 mpg UK).
As always, I checked real fuel consumption on a petrol station. I noticed difference: 1% (computer shows 1% smaller fuel consumption comparing to what I refueled).
WOW!!! very impressive!!! i like you real life test for ADAS systems and fuel consumptions. No mainstram car reviewer does this type of tests!!!
Excellent fuel consumption
I have a 1.0ltr MK8 golf etsi and it absolutely eats the fuel when making short journeys, the mild hybrid technology makes the engine switch off when coasting, even for a split second of taking your foot off the accelerator. This causes the engine to constantly switch on and off
Isn't that the idea? I've got one on order (coming in a few days) and your comment has somewhat but the fear of God into me. I assumed it would be a bit more economical than the 1.5 eTSI. What kind of MPG do you get on say, a 45m to 1hr run?
Same here, it really _really_ does not like short trips. The issue is not the engine switching off, but rather how long the engine takes to warm up (and that it barely warms up at idle). Before oil is >80C or so it actually does not do any efficiency trickery. Hybrid regen is limited, auto start/stop is limited, engine does not switch off while coasting. Once its warm for me it actually sips fuel at
well, it's kinda hard to avoid that...
it's for emission control, because the catalytic converter needs to get up to temperature as fast as possible...
Great job man very good and informative video good job!
Great video, exactly what I needed. Thank you very much
Finally someone normal
I'd appreciate a video of the new Renault Clio e-tech 140 on this consumption drive.
I will try :)
if it only had a motor to move the car in the take offs, when it goes up to 40liters in instantaneous consumption, with all the features of coasting and cylinder on demand, it really would make a better hybrid than toyota, in terms of fuel consumptions, it already gets 4l100km without the help of an electric motor on the take offs and on small distances here and there, as a full hybrid does. volkwagen really need to get their hybrid game on point, they need to ditch the plug in, we don't need that, and the mild is good, but can do better, so really volkswagen, give us a full hybrid on the base of this eTSI mild hybrid. put a 1.2 kwh battery, a small electric engine, a good hybrid energy managment that cuts the ice as much as possible, and we could have one of the best efficient car
I will like to see Golf 8 tdi 2.0 city and motorway consumptions tests. I read its impressive.
Look at Octavia 2.0 TDI, Golf with this engine will be even better (lighter): th-cam.com/video/XvQXyQch__E/w-d-xo.html
great info thank you very much
Bardzo ładne spalanie, udowadnia to jedno - że elektryki są kompletnie nieopłacalne i nieoptymalne do codziennego użytkowania skoro w aucie spalinowym z lekkim wsparciem elektrycznym, które nie podnosi bardzo masy auta i jego ceny można zrobić takie wyniki.
EDIT: Sprawdzałem teraz także cennik Golfa z tym silnikiem w wersji Style, wychodzi około 130 tys (full wyposażenie) i jest ono porównywalne do Corolli. Jeśli chodzi o systemy bezpieczeństwa pewnie tutaj VW wygląda lepiej jednak jeśli chodzi o samą opłacalność to tutaj Toyota wychodzi do przodu dzięki mniejszemu spalaniu jednak tutaj różnica nie jest duża (tylko i może dla kogoś aż litr :) ) Ciekaw jestem bardzo jak będzie wyglądać silnik 1.0 z miękką hybrydą. Czyżby były realne wyniki rzędu 4 litrów?
1.0 ... po podwórku chcesz jeździć?
@@adamk.4053 Po mieście. Jest całkowicie wystarczający.
It all depends on what people mean when they say “city driving”. For me, it’s all start and stop driving continuously. What we saw in the video was definite not that. I’m guessing that the consumption would be much higher under the conditions I described.
It does look like a nice and economical engine though.
Yes, you are right: for many people "city driving" means in reality sth. else. I cannot prepare the test which is familiar with EVERY city scenario. This is why I make tests which are comparable between each other. Can you tell me what avg. speed usually you get?
@@1001cars 16-18 kmh
@@paparen Not as low as I thought. Sometimes I had such avg. speed. The car with hybrid system would not have higher fuel consumption comparing to higher speed.
exactly, city driving is usually 10-15km/h average speed and you also usually drive with engine COLD.
this video is showing the best scenario for such a car which you usually do not achieve in real world.
i really like mild hybird fuel economy in city. but i m little worry about short trip in winter. hope every hybird vehicle come with a button to switch to "normal mode"
Yeah, i wonder about turbo and winter conditions how will this work in the long term.
it shouldnt turn the engine off if its not warmed up yet afaik
thank you very much for your video , could you please do the same test on highway on speed of 90/100 km/h?
I have uploaded such video. It will be public tomorrow morning :)
Hello from romania! Like !!!!!!!
What happens if you have air con on? Does it get warmer when engine is at 0 rpm coasting? Or does it inhibit the coasting mode.. I wonder
Electric aircon compressor.
Will you do acceleration test video with 1.5 eTSI?
I have recorded it so yes I am going to publish such video :)
you should come in Bucharest, Romania.... the average speed in a workday is maximum 12km/h. Here, that consumption will be double.
It is not the case to show fuel consumption exactly at speed xxx or yyy. The thing is to make possibility to compare many different cars in similar conditions. It is obvious that at much lower speed consumption will be higher, but not twice.
@@1001cars în Bucharest, the fuel consumption is measured at litres/hour, not per 100 km. Frequently, 500m are made in 10 minutes. In The last year, 20 km office-home are made in 2 hours. At many cars i have measured the fuel consumption în different scenarios (30 km/h vs 12 km/h) and difference is at least twice.
This is interesting in comparison with corolla hybrid. One question arises, which engine will be more durable...
the Toyota of course
Hey! Does this car have a gas pedal vibration or something for when to lift foot from acceleration pedal? Or does it just make a sound/icon on the dashboard?
I am not sure when I should feel sth. like that. Can you explain?
Hi! Does the 130 hp version consume more or less, in your opinion?
Thanks!
1.5 eTSI 130 HP has almost the same consumption comparing to 1.5 eTSI 150 HP. The difference is minimal.
city drive with the 2L tdi 150hp i did 3.9L avg in confort mode 😅🤣
Show me the photo :) with avg. speed visible :)
Hi i heard that this engine ... shut's down a lot even when coasting to achieve these figures, is that healthy for it ?
Did you watch the movie over the comments section? :) It is clearly visible :)
Prius przy takiej jeździe spala 3.2 max do 3.5
am I doing something wrong? do you have certain settings? I always drive 6-7l
Just eco mode :) The rest you have on the movie :)
no, his test is made on city outskirts where traffic is lighter and average speed is higher hence he gets these good numbers.
@@vladmihai306 try again and watch the movie again, you were so focused on different things that you missed the moment when I entered to the city center :)
Why does the fuel gauge always show 230?
Not, at start was 240 km :) Loot also at second attempt.
Does Eco Mode and normal Mode have big difference?
No, the difference is quite small.
I'm hearing the turbo cry... :(
first test drive is pointless, it is OUTSIDE of the city. and it barely manages 5l/100 where a 2.0 tdi would do easily better than that.
2nd also...there are long stretches of road where you can maintain a high speed.
Try again on city center with actual crowded traffic and city lights. you'll get more like 10.
If you suggest that i was OUTSIDE of the city you should show me city sign (that I entered to the city) :) Result for the diesel engine in similar condition is on my youtube channel, you should easily find it :) Try again :)