ไม่สามารถเล่นวิดีโอนี้
ขออภัยในความไม่สะดวก
Australia: Indian Origin Senator Takes Oath on Bhagavad Gita | Subscribe to Firstpost
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 6 ก.พ. 2024
- Australia: Indian Origin Senator Takes Oath on Bhagavad Gita | Subscribe to Firstpost
In Australia’s capital Canberra, Indian-origin Varun Ghosh became the first member of the parliament to take an oath on the Bhagavad Gita. The Legislative Assembly and the Legislative Council appointed him as a senator to represent the Australian state in the Senate of the Federal Parliament.
---
Australia | Indin-Origin Senator | Varun Ghosh | Bhagavad Gita | Firstpost | World News | Latest News | Global News | International News | Trending News
#australia #indianorigin #senator #bhagavadgita #firstpost #worldnews #latestnews #globalnews #internationalnews #trendingnews
Firstpost is an Indian news and media website. Get all the incisive opinions, in-depth analyses and other visual stories that matter to you and the world right here on this channel.
Subscribe to Firstpost channel and press the bell icon to get notified when we go live.
/ @firstpost
Follow Firstpost on Instagram:
/ firstpost
Follow Firstpost on Facebook:
/ firstpostin
Follow Firstpost on Twitter:
/ firstpost
Follow Firstpost on WhatsApp:
www.whatsapp.c...
A very proud Hindu! Well done!
Bharat Mata ki jai🎉
Day by day India & sanatana growing ❤
Next Generation of this Man will be Christian 😁
@@shubhhkumar6787
Then why are they leaving the country? Australia at least has Rice Bags to give. Can you even afford a Rice Bag?😜
@@monisingh771
And in spite of all the Great Universities we still have the highest number of Illiteracy. What was your Grandfather's education?
😁
@@shubhhkumar6787
Real Santanis don't make fun of ANY RELIGION or GOD.
Be careful Brother it's BAD KARMA!
@@shubhhkumar6787
What makes you think that the Rest of the world eats Rice? The Rice produced in India is eaten by Indians who left India because they DONT WANT TO BE IN INDIA!😂
Very very Proud of you 🙏
congratulations!
He will be more loyal to the Australia then most Australian.
Iam very proud to be Indian
Congratulations🎉 Varun Ghosh ji.
Jai Bhaarath 🇮🇳🙏Jai Bharatheey👍
Wherever you are always proud of your roots and culture 💪
Long live india.
So an Indian vows allegiance to an English King once again! Not sure why all the Indians are cheering?
Because Australia os an englishmen country.
Doing so in India is incorrect.
Be roman when u r in rome
Just a spark its going to be a wild fire..
Better not to do that if your oath is like that 😂 who the heck is loyal to king Charles ?
Australia is not a republic, they don't have a president as they're still a partial democracy, they refer to the UK king as their king!!
Prince Charles 😅
What a chad! A gigachad Bangali 🔥🔥
The world becomes a canvas, painted with the vibrant hues of solidarity for Ukraine's struggle.
Ram Ram ❤❤
Still owing allegiance to an English king !
Nice 👍
🙏🙏
It is a disgrace to gita and bagawan, touching it and taking the oath of allegiance to the king is not something to be proud of...
Take it lightly bro, it's not a disgrace if he feels good by starting his work with Bhagwat Geeta regardless of the location then it's good because it's a book full of knowledge, it will only help him!!
Time will come when 5 eyes are controlled by indian
Surprised that in a sovereign democratic and developed country like Australia they still take oath of allegiance to His Majesty King Charles😮
Australia still is an independent country. The constitutional monarchy arrangement is one between the Australian goverment and the House of Windsor, not the Australian goverment and the British goverment.
The way the arrangement works is that the UK and Australia are two separate nations with two separate governments but share the same constitutional monarch.
And the constitutional monarchy doesn't actually hold legislative power anymore, and instead remains for mostly ceremonial purposes, such as the ceremonial oath shown in the video.
If the UK held a referendum and voted to end the British monarchy, King Charles would still be the constitutional monarch of Australia.
Greatness of our Sanathana Dharmam.
Economic refugee
Isn't Ghosh bengali
Why King Charles referred in Australia.
Google it FFS
Allegiance to Charles and I thought Australia was an independent country? 😂
Australia still is an independent country. The constitutional monarchy arrangement is one between the Australian goverment and the House of Windsor, not the Australian goverment and the British goverment.
The way the arrangement works is that the UK and Australia are two separate nations with two separate governments but share the same constitutional monarch.
And the constitutional monarchy doesn't actually hold legislative power anymore, and instead remains for mostly ceremonial purposes, such as the ceremonial oath shown in the video.
If the UK held a referendum and voted to end the British monarchy, King Charles would still be the constitutional monarch of Australia.
@jamesclarke2789 I bring it up because I believe in democracy and not monarchy at any level. Regardless of the ceremonial nature, personally, I can't stand privileges earned by birth. I see the same "reasoning" for monarchy in most western Europe. I dont believe in "bending my knees for privileged few." That is just me. Appreciate your explanation.
@@arungore2797 I generally agree with your view on democracy and monarchy. My first comment wasn't really an endorsement of the constitutional monarchy, just an explanation as it seems that many people don't seem to understand the crucial differences between the British goverment and the House of Windsor.
My view is that the constitutional monarchy in Australia is an outdated relic of Australia's past and doesn't really represent or reflect modern Australia, as a country moving into the future, and its increasingly multicultural population.
My own self and my family being an example as my Japanese mother doesn't have any actual cultural or traditional ties to the House of Windsor, or the UK as a matter of fact.
Plus, I know that many people from a place like India perceive Australia as largely 'White Anglo Saxon British/English' because of the ancestorial and language ties, but from the perspective of most white people born in Australia, Britain still is a foreign country, with foreign people and with only modest cultural connections to Australia.
The fact that there are shared ancestorial and language links doesn't change the fact that the UK is still seen by many white Australians as a faraway country halfway across the world, with decreasing economic, cultural and political relevancy to modern Australia.
That sentiment tends to extend to topics like the constitutional monarchy.
💀 very well.
Whats the Big Deal. Why would a Hindu want to take an Oath on the Quaran or the Bible😂
@@rohanbhatnagar31039
If tomorrow the Next PM of India is a Muslim. Should he take an Oath of the Constitution using the Bhagwadgita or the Quran or the Bible?
@shivakanthmandal-zg4ec in india we take oath on constitution not on holy books u should know as being indian
He is a pseudo intellectual , a pseudo liberal . He won’t know that
@@nam070
Brah. It's an Oath or Affirmation on the Constitution or the Holy Book. They are not physically touching the Holy Book or the Constitution. They are just attesting that they are bound to the laws and HENCE ITS NOT A BIG DEAL!
@@gujarati16
Your GUJJU ASs problem is that you don't want to think about a Muslim PM😜
Monarchy not going out of there way! Charles is King! in today's day and age. Seems quite bleak.
Faithful to King Charles 😂😂😂
🎉🎉
Нет Страха Божия и трепета перед вечным Судом. Развратный образ жизни отключает Совесть.
Поэтому Бог через Священные Тексты предупреждает- Ге ходить на совет нечестивых и жрать не пить рядом с такими - чревато набраться с кем в одной упряжке.
Hindu always great
Ai bara title abar ghosh
To his majesty what the f is wrong with this people, this countries are clearly vassal States, they are not free countries how they give faltu ka free gyan on democracy to us Indians?
The constitutional monarchy arrangement is not between the Australian goverment and the British goverment, it's between the Australian goverment and the House of Windsor.
The arrangement doesn't give any legislative or political authority over Australia to the British goverment, as the British goverment and House of Windsor are two separate institutions.
And the arrangement doesn't give the House of Windsor any legislative or political authority over Australia, as the constitutional arrangements mean that the constitutional monarchy in Australia exists solely as a ceremonial position with no legislative power.
@@jamesclarke2789 it's a vassal state these countries vassal state of the so called roman Christian Empire which is now called as USA all these P 5 nation doesn't have independent foreign policy and they have US necler arm (manage by usa ) in their land and no one is sovereign
@@jyotinanoma6227 whatever you say
Australia is a free country don't need to have any allegiance to UK monarch anymore.
I disapprove.
Why are they still referring to England Royalty ?! Aren't they democratic sovereign country??
Why swear by Charles lll ? Are they still in Imperial past ?!
They are Englishman
@@Shadow-uw3ld Ancestors were, sure.
Alongside the Scots, Welsh, Irish and Cornish, all of which are separate ethnic groups to the English who also originate from the UK.
But an ethnic group, such as the English, is not a biological phenomenon. Ethnic groups are a sociocultural phenomenon.
And aside from the English language, I'm not exactly sure what sociocultural ties you think I have to a foreign country like the UK, that I've never stepped foot in.
They are not Republic, they have partial democracy, they have yet to adopt complete democracy.
That's why they still refer to the king of the UK as their king to this age.
Faithful to king charles shame on you .
Not so shame compared with Converted Rice bag and Peacefuls 😂😂😂😂