@@-..----.--.-... except pesa is dogshit compared to aesa but since the only aesa the russians have is (and even that is only supposedly) on the su-57 it's not in gaijin's priority to implement properly.
For the record 8 MICAs is not an incorrect loadout, its just a wartime kit which france does not run as (clearly) they have not been at war with a peer nation since the rafale was introduced. 6 MICAs is just france's standard loadout for CAS, patrol, SEAD, etc. missions where other ordinance or external fuel tanks are more important. It is very clear the the rafale F3 can carry 8 MICAs just by looking at pictures of various combat loads with MICAs on 8 separate pylons. (Yes the rafale F3 and F3R both have that 'extra' pylon that everyone claims only the indian version has, if anyone likes I can send public photos of rafale F3s from before 2015 clearly showing the 'extra' pylon.)
Those pylons were only seen at airshow demos and testing for F.4/export variants no? France could have totally paid for it, they just didn't. I don't recall saying it was an "incorrect" loadout either, did I? If I did that's my bad
@@GeneralLee2000 While dassault did make a big show of the extra pylons at the 2010 expo every F3 was capable of fitting them and many did including several F3Rs, they're hard to find if you don't speak french but I have several pictures I'd be glad to share of an F3 and F3R from the pre F4 era mounting MICAs on the extra pylons for specialized ground support missions. Not every F3 fitted these pylons as for most missions there was no need, but whenever there was a need the F3 and F3R did fit, use and fly missions with MICAs on the extra pylons.
what most WT players dont get, is that the MICA is NOT the long range missile for the rafale, it is the METEOR which currently would completely unbalance even more than the phoenix at 12.0 and the map are too small for this missile to such a point that the rafale could fire it from the air base at ennemy team while they take off
Seriously? They just noticed the problem with the automatic switching between radar and IRST, I've had this problem on the Su-27 and MiG-29 since they put the automatic switching in radar mode.Please there was no problem with the flares it is a top tier plane without problems
I and other players would argue the MICAs are actually better 2 minutes into the match because most players from who I’ve encountered stay low to the ground and the aim120s are easily notchable at range. But yeah if your enemies are running away your rafale and micas are gonna struggle. Love your timely vidows, despite gaijins poor timing.
Thank you very much! Personally I've found myself in a lot more situations where I was wishing for more range than the few where I have a super close range HOBS target, but everyones mileage varies :)
There absolutely needs to be an option to toggle off the automatic radar mode switching because that shit is infuriating. Being able to manage your radar well in high stress environments was a learned skill and I got quite good at it. I’m very frustrated that gaijin basically made my work and experience completely worthless with that change.
Maybe the wobble wobble of thrust vectoring missiles will be fixed someday. I don't imagine it has a negligible impact on any thrust vectoring missiles with their range.
FYI (disclaimer: this is just my experience) I dont seem to have the IRST bug at all and ive done over a hundred games in the rafale since patch day, it might have something to do with 'Targets cyclic switching of aircraft radar' being turned on? Everyone i have seen with the bug has that setting on whereas a few friends and I all have it off and have no issues with the IRST bug. Could also just be gaijin being gaijin though.
8 missiles in french service in 2026 (2 meteor, 2 mica ng em, 2 mica ng ir, 2 mica ir) And the mica ng ir will be the main missile for the 5 years. In 2031 a new radar aesa GaN multi-way will enter service.
most WT player dont understand that gaijin doesn't give the rafale its real capabilities, especially 90% of them dont know what the METEOR is and how much it put the PL 12 and amraam to shame
To me the Rafale is the top plane in ARB. Just plane to plane no armament, I enjoy the Rafale much more. That instant notching turn that you need to do in close range fights feels better to me. Now to the missiles, sure the micas don’t have the 120 range but when you get used to their play style the are beyond fun
As good as the MICAS are for close range, they still need fix for their long range capability. IRL they are capable of 80km range, it's prooved that ingame they have too much drag (alongside a diameter a little too big) and wooble too much thanks to the code behind the TVC, bug report have been sent and some even accepted... 9 months ago. Cross finger for them to be fixed in 2025.
This is a game, are you guys aware of it? Gaijin did a good job of balancing Fox 3s overall for all nations(not saying that the platforms that carry them or the total power of missile+platform). Each missile has something it excels at (not supposed to be best among all but its strong side). And obviously, it is the manoeuvrability that Mica excels at. Additionally, I don't think that Mica needs any more range than it has right now, even though it means that not will be realistic. Maybe it can change when other nations(or export platforms) have reached the same league. But not any time soon.
@@karkinos5398 @-..----.--.-... actually, in the files MICA is the only one HARD CAPED at 50km. It means it will self destroy after 50km. This is not the case for r77 and aam-4 (for PL-12 it's a bit different, it's missing around 20% of range due to hard cap as well if I remember well, but not sure). This might be due to other factors such as drag etc, but they don't have hard cap. MICA is the only missile missing almost 40% of it's real range.
2:12 I don't really understand how people prefer something like the AIM-120. If I launch these at anything more than 10km away people notch it or multipath it almost all the time. I mostly use them at these ranges to pressure enemies to defend and get closer for a better launch. Few months ago people were much worse but now most know how to avoid fox-3s (especially on patch day or the week after).
People dont know how the DL works either. If my plane's radar is still tracking you with tws, the amraam will not give a fuck about your notching. Most people switch target and fire more missiles
@@invertedv12powerhouse77 That may be the case in closer ranges but if the target is also perpendicular to your radar (which is often the case in BVR) and they also chaff you will most likely lose the lock as well and it will just miss.
Now, think that this jet can carry Meteor IRL ! Meteor + MICA NG + MICA IR on the same "packet".. and see why this jet is feared and such a commercial success !
you mixup things. MICA NG is an upgraded variant that exist for both MICA IR and EM, so in later variant it will be Meteor + MICA NG IR + MIC NG EM, no need to use MICA IR when the NG comes :p But that's not for today, NG variants are still in development.
Honestly I can’t wait for the J10B and C. They should play like a mix of the Rafale and Eurofighter because the PL 12’s are much more balanced in terms of engagement use compared to the amraam and mica found on the other two aforementioned vehicles.
4:01 This is not entirely correct. The solid Line on the left is the lift boundary, and the solid line to the right is the structural limit. The reason why the Rafale's looks better is because the Rafale can tolerate more Gs, however it isn't actually that clear cut, since the EF can pull more Gs than its limit for very short durations. The Dashed SEP lines with negative numbers are turnrates corresponding to a set level of speed bleed, and it is pretty easy to see that no matter how much speed you are bleeding, the EF turns harder. So in theory it wouldn't matter that at, say, 800 IAS and -6400 ft/s (heavily bleeding speed btw, basically full S hold) the EF turns harder because it would be outside the flight envelope, but the fact is that the EF can push the outside of that flight envelope for short durations
Nice review, just just win a new sub ! Btw, I flew this plane over 30 battles and pretty much full. It's a nice upgrade but for some reason I prefer Mirage 2000 5F. Also, even after the buff, radar still pain in the ass. For some reason it doesn't want to lock even if the enemis is flying straight to you. Very very frustrating. It's for me the biggest negative point of the plane.
brimstones should be fire and forget, not having radar homing is just abismal, i understand that not being able to smoke to prevent a hit is op but maybe they could give it IR or radar with some gimmicky smoke misses, it would be artificial in any case but being stuck with laser is a bit too painful
The radar just being slightly faster in its scan is disappointing. Maybe for a PESA that is ok but an AESA should be crazy as it isn't limited in how quickly it scans due to no moving parts, it can also use its antenna's independently since each has its own transceiver and power source
Aesa should offer a tws mode that tracks targets as well as a hard lock on a mechanical radar. It should scan nearly instantly across the full array and be able to track and target ground vehicles and air vehicles at the same time. It also offers radar imaging of the target and modern AESAs will list what the target is and high value targets first.. the radar set should be able to track and jam incoming missiles as well as enemy jets. An accurately modeled modern AESA radar would give a full battlefield view in 3-5 seconds even in a 16v16 match, jam all incoming missiles and guide it's own and other friendly missiles on to targets simultaneously
Firstly, PESA uses the same method to “move” its beam as AESA - both rotate phases of their “cells”(TRM’s) so they literally have the same speed limits that depends entirely on electronics and not on type of antenna. Secondly even though AESA can theoretically “split” its main beam and make every single TRM work independently and scan the zone instantly - this will decrease range of the radar by (amount of TRM)^1/4 so in case of Rafale’s radar that has 838 TRM’s its range will be 5.4x times shorter than if it’d use a single beam pattern + PESA’s algorithm of async updating already detected targets that gives an insta update of already detected targets anyway(which is basically what we have in the game - the radar works the same way as Su-34’s one) with the only 2 differences for AESA in game that is it’s unable to HARD-lock multiple targets at once while losing in max range with every additional target which is in case of WT as important as ground mapping or in other words useless and the second one is that it lacks LPI which won’t be implemented in the game anyway any time soon (most likely) Though both Su-34’s PESA and Rafale’s AESA are indeed slower than they should be in terms of regular scanning (speed of the main beam), these radars should be able to scan 60x30deg zone by less than 2s, in game it takes around 5 seconds
@СергейНикольский-я2ц I'm just sad that US once again doesn't get tech it invented first. I mean Japan made it first but regardless Japan and US have used AESA since 1995-1998. Mean while the rafale wasn't even introduced until 2001. Su 34 wasnt released until 2014!!! USA should have f22 and f35 before that! With full AESA, DAS, and datalink capabilities. And Aim9x and Aim120c-10 or D
France reallys get overloved Rafale is overall better in the perspective of muti-role And i must remind people that Gaijin steal the thrust from EF and gave it to Rafale
@@GeneralLee2000 I could take those values with a grain of salt though. They are very unreliable especially with Eurocanard. They do give good comparaisons (between eurocanard, and between regular planes, not very much between eurocanard and other planes), but the actual values are often not realistic
@@tvcat5847 its still bs. its probably one, if not the best mechanical radar even able to mimic some aesa functions, but somehow in the game its pretty slow, tracking all the time ghosts and cant maintain a tws lock. Its just garbage right now, even the ICE got better radar.
@@Likeaworm Should already be in game for the F-15E, the F-15C doesn't need it, Gaijin likely wouldn't keep it at that BR if it got it. The F-15E needs it because this Rafale and the Eurofighter both have (will have) much better radars then the current F-15Es radar.
@@aflyingcowboy31 no they don’t, the f15s are plenty competitive at the moment, and the rafale is the only one with a truly better radar the ef2000 and f15’s radars really are interchangeably better
Eurofighters got their radar buffed, with more to come. SU27s have been buffed massively. What has been nerfed since this update? And dont say Eurofighter because that flightmodel on the dev was bullshit just like the f15E when it came out
@@jeanvaljean9293 I hoped that everyone understands my comment, but i see there are crazy people always. Im not complaining. Im perfectly fine how is the Eurofighter rn, only the radar and irst bug is the problem. I dont care about the missiles bc 6 of them is perfectly fine. (Would be good if we could carry 8? Yes. But i dont give a shit.) Dont try to be smart when you are not even understand the comment. Take a step back and think before you start replying.
@@MrStrafeMan The things is that if Gaijongers just said "It will only carry 6 due to balancing" it would be fine but the blunderfools that work at that office do absolutley fuck all or make up stuff. The Rafale can carry 8 and therefore should be able to do so in-game unless they state stuff like balance
@@xlgapelsin6173 The reason i said that the Frogs cried for it, is that i read some posts and i found informations about the version what we have ingame. And looks like it should carry only 6 mica. Probably the Rafale M can carry 8 or somehing. But bc of that, i guess mot of us believed that gaijin is gonna leave the rafale and the eurofighter with only 6x ARH, and then we got a better version with 8 or even more if possible.
They can model an AESA but not the CAPTOR on the eurofighter. They should give the eurofighter the double AIM-120 pylons if they want to give the rafale more missiles
AESA radar for gaijin: a pulse doppler with some tweaks.
No? It already has instantaneous tws target updates, just like the pesa on the su-34
@@-..----.--.-... except pesa is dogshit compared to aesa but since the only aesa the russians have is (and even that is only supposedly) on the su-57 it's not in gaijin's priority to implement properly.
@@kerotomas1 и это нормально, меньше будут базы бомбить на прем истребителях..
Methed up pulse Doppler
@@kerotomas1Mig 31?
For the record 8 MICAs is not an incorrect loadout, its just a wartime kit which france does not run as (clearly) they have not been at war with a peer nation since the rafale was introduced. 6 MICAs is just france's standard loadout for CAS, patrol, SEAD, etc. missions where other ordinance or external fuel tanks are more important. It is very clear the the rafale F3 can carry 8 MICAs just by looking at pictures of various combat loads with MICAs on 8 separate pylons. (Yes the rafale F3 and F3R both have that 'extra' pylon that everyone claims only the indian version has, if anyone likes I can send public photos of rafale F3s from before 2015 clearly showing the 'extra' pylon.)
Those pylons were only seen at airshow demos and testing for F.4/export variants no? France could have totally paid for it, they just didn't. I don't recall saying it was an "incorrect" loadout either, did I? If I did that's my bad
@@GeneralLee2000 While dassault did make a big show of the extra pylons at the 2010 expo every F3 was capable of fitting them and many did including several F3Rs, they're hard to find if you don't speak french but I have several pictures I'd be glad to share of an F3 and F3R from the pre F4 era mounting MICAs on the extra pylons for specialized ground support missions. Not every F3 fitted these pylons as for most missions there was no need, but whenever there was a need the F3 and F3R did fit, use and fly missions with MICAs on the extra pylons.
No the rafale will carry METEOR in real life
@@AgentK-im8ke Where did I say it does not carry meteor? Obviously it does buddy but we are talking in the context of whats available in wt
what most WT players dont get, is that the MICA is NOT the long range missile for the rafale, it is the METEOR which currently would completely unbalance even more than the phoenix at 12.0 and the map are too small for this missile to such a point that the rafale could fire it from the air base at ennemy team while they take off
Meanwhile gripen: still recovering from the 98 nerfs gaijin slapped on it 🤕
Seriously? They just noticed the problem with the automatic switching between radar and IRST, I've had this problem on the Su-27 and MiG-29 since they put the automatic switching in radar mode.Please there was no problem with the flares it is a top tier plane without problems
I and other players would argue the MICAs are actually better 2 minutes into the match because most players from who I’ve encountered stay low to the ground and the aim120s are easily notchable at range. But yeah if your enemies are running away your rafale and micas are gonna struggle. Love your timely vidows, despite gaijins poor timing.
Thank you very much! Personally I've found myself in a lot more situations where I was wishing for more range than the few where I have a super close range HOBS target, but everyones mileage varies :)
Guess it depends how aggressively you play, if you're someone who likes to get into knife fights the micas are just the best ARH missile in the game
There absolutely needs to be an option to toggle off the automatic radar mode switching because that shit is infuriating.
Being able to manage your radar well in high stress environments was a learned skill and I got quite good at it. I’m very frustrated that gaijin basically made my work and experience completely worthless with that change.
Same here, mate
Only good side to it is that now my phantoms can actually switch to standard pulse during a hard lock, whereas before it couldnt
The thing is... You SHOULD be able to shoot a fox 3 on a target locked on with IRST with the rafale.
Im pretty sure Gaijin is looking into implementing that later down the line
Maybe the wobble wobble of thrust vectoring missiles will be fixed someday. I don't imagine it has a negligible impact on any thrust vectoring missiles with their range.
@@KaguyasBeat I've HEARD that it's a visual glitch and the missile isn't wobbling server side, but I'm not sure. Regardless that would be awesome yeah
God forbid the radar isn't exactly accurate. AESA or not, it doesn't matter that much
The low deck speed is the biggest problem for me.
FYI (disclaimer: this is just my experience) I dont seem to have the IRST bug at all and ive done over a hundred games in the rafale since patch day, it might have something to do with 'Targets cyclic switching of aircraft radar' being turned on? Everyone i have seen with the bug has that setting on whereas a few friends and I all have it off and have no issues with the IRST bug. Could also just be gaijin being gaijin though.
I didnt have this issue either till today, everyone in a slight notch causes the HMD to switch to track IR
No way! This is the exact moment where the Rafail became the Midfale!
LOL
If only they gave the F-104S ASA the 6 AIM-9Ls it had irl 😔
I hope they add mica ir soon
8 missiles in french service in 2026 (2 meteor, 2 mica ng em, 2 mica ng ir, 2 mica ir)
And the mica ng ir will be the main missile for the 5 years.
In 2031 a new radar aesa GaN multi-way will enter service.
most WT player dont understand that gaijin doesn't give the rafale its real capabilities, especially 90% of them dont know what the METEOR is and how much it put the PL 12 and amraam to shame
One minute my reaction time is ass
3 people ahead of you... smh
To me the Rafale is the top plane in ARB. Just plane to plane no armament, I enjoy the Rafale much more. That instant notching turn that you need to do in close range fights feels better to me. Now to the missiles, sure the micas don’t have the 120 range but when you get used to their play style the are beyond fun
2:14 dude thought that multipathing will save him lmao
He’s not low enough
@the_jingo there no alt in the game to 100% multipath ;)
@@spookygulag9342 unless you want to count German EFT going underground
At 0:39, was that vapour cone off center?
they moved the vapour cones forwards for some reason.
As good as the MICAS are for close range, they still need fix for their long range capability.
IRL they are capable of 80km range, it's prooved that ingame they have too much drag (alongside a diameter a little too big) and wooble too much thanks to the code behind the TVC, bug report have been sent and some even accepted... 9 months ago.
Cross finger for them to be fixed in 2025.
Same thing with r77
@@karkinos5398 Aam-4 and pl-12 as well
This is a game, are you guys aware of it? Gaijin did a good job of balancing Fox 3s overall for all nations(not saying that the platforms that carry them or the total power of missile+platform). Each missile has something it excels at (not supposed to be best among all but its strong side). And obviously, it is the manoeuvrability that Mica excels at. Additionally, I don't think that Mica needs any more range than it has right now, even though it means that not will be realistic. Maybe it can change when other nations(or export platforms) have reached the same league. But not any time soon.
@@lightyagami5365not really aim 120 is still probably the best one in most scenarios, some by far… not really balanced tbh
@@karkinos5398 @-..----.--.-... actually, in the files MICA is the only one HARD CAPED at 50km. It means it will self destroy after 50km. This is not the case for r77 and aam-4 (for PL-12 it's a bit different, it's missing around 20% of range due to hard cap as well if I remember well, but not sure). This might be due to other factors such as drag etc, but they don't have hard cap. MICA is the only missile missing almost 40% of it's real range.
They need to add a CCRP hud indicator. I fly in sim and there is no way of knowing when to drop bombs in the cockpit
2:12 I don't really understand how people prefer something like the AIM-120. If I launch these at anything more than 10km away people notch it or multipath it almost all the time. I mostly use them at these ranges to pressure enemies to defend and get closer for a better launch. Few months ago people were much worse but now most know how to avoid fox-3s (especially on patch day or the week after).
People dont know how the DL works either. If my plane's radar is still tracking you with tws, the amraam will not give a fuck about your notching. Most people switch target and fire more missiles
People don't know as well that simulation is a mode
@@invertedv12powerhouse77 That may be the case in closer ranges but if the target is also perpendicular to your radar (which is often the case in BVR) and they also chaff you will most likely lose the lock as well and it will just miss.
This reminds me of when they first introduced the harrier SRAAM missles or whatever they were called, but on steroids
Can confirm at 6pm cst the yes on typhoon still isn’t working
Here I am in my recently spaded F-15C being left behind...
Now, think that this jet can carry Meteor IRL !
Meteor + MICA NG + MICA IR on the same "packet".. and see why this jet is feared and such a commercial success !
you mixup things.
MICA NG is an upgraded variant that exist for both MICA IR and EM, so in later variant it will be Meteor + MICA NG IR + MIC NG EM, no need to use MICA IR when the NG comes :p
But that's not for today, NG variants are still in development.
Its really funny that they refuse to give the Brimstone fire and forget capabilities but every other jet has them lol
Seeing the TWS work properly pains me, the typhoon radar is absolutely killing me
2:10 wow. excuse me sir, i am not a rat. 👺👺
Honestly I can’t wait for the J10B and C. They should play like a mix of the Rafale and Eurofighter because the PL 12’s are much more balanced in terms of engagement use compared to the amraam and mica found on the other two aforementioned vehicles.
4:01 This is not entirely correct. The solid Line on the left is the lift boundary, and the solid line to the right is the structural limit. The reason why the Rafale's looks better is because the Rafale can tolerate more Gs, however it isn't actually that clear cut, since the EF can pull more Gs than its limit for very short durations.
The Dashed SEP lines with negative numbers are turnrates corresponding to a set level of speed bleed, and it is pretty easy to see that no matter how much speed you are bleeding, the EF turns harder.
So in theory it wouldn't matter that at, say, 800 IAS and -6400 ft/s (heavily bleeding speed btw, basically full S hold) the EF turns harder because it would be outside the flight envelope, but the fact is that the EF can push the outside of that flight envelope for short durations
No views? Lemme fix that.
Yessir!
Lmao
Actually you can overspeed on 102%, maybe even on only 101 but not sure
Yes you Can lol
@makow_5637 damn
I'm really interested in RAFAIL gif in the intro. 💀💀
Nice review, just just win a new sub !
Btw, I flew this plane over 30 battles and pretty much full.
It's a nice upgrade but for some reason I prefer Mirage 2000 5F.
Also, even after the buff, radar still pain in the ass. For some reason it doesn't want to lock even if the enemis is flying straight to you.
Very very frustrating.
It's for me the biggest negative point of the plane.
Thank you very much, I'm glad you enjoyed! Yeah, the radar issues can be infuriating sometimes. Cmon Gaijin...
brimstones should be fire and forget, not having radar homing is just abismal, i understand that not being able to smoke to prevent a hit is op but maybe they could give it IR or radar with some gimmicky smoke misses, it would be artificial in any case but being stuck with laser is a bit too painful
You see buddy the Rafale can actually carry 8 MICAs in a wartime config if needed
The radar just being slightly faster in its scan is disappointing. Maybe for a PESA that is ok but an AESA should be crazy as it isn't limited in how quickly it scans due to no moving parts, it can also use its antenna's independently since each has its own transceiver and power source
Aesa should offer a tws mode that tracks targets as well as a hard lock on a mechanical radar. It should scan nearly instantly across the full array and be able to track and target ground vehicles and air vehicles at the same time. It also offers radar imaging of the target and modern AESAs will list what the target is and high value targets first.. the radar set should be able to track and jam incoming missiles as well as enemy jets. An accurately modeled modern AESA radar would give a full battlefield view in 3-5 seconds even in a 16v16 match, jam all incoming missiles and guide it's own and other friendly missiles on to targets simultaneously
Firstly, PESA uses the same method to “move” its beam as AESA - both rotate phases of their “cells”(TRM’s) so they literally have the same speed limits that depends entirely on electronics and not on type of antenna.
Secondly even though AESA can theoretically “split” its main beam and make every single TRM work independently and scan the zone instantly - this will decrease range of the radar by (amount of TRM)^1/4 so in case of Rafale’s radar that has 838 TRM’s its range will be 5.4x times shorter than if it’d use a single beam pattern + PESA’s algorithm of async updating already detected targets that gives an insta update of already detected targets anyway(which is basically what we have in the game - the radar works the same way as Su-34’s one) with the only 2 differences for AESA in game that is it’s unable to HARD-lock multiple targets at once while losing in max range with every additional target which is in case of WT as important as ground mapping or in other words useless and the second one is that it lacks LPI which won’t be implemented in the game anyway any time soon (most likely)
Though both Su-34’s PESA and Rafale’s AESA are indeed slower than they should be in terms of regular scanning (speed of the main beam), these radars should be able to scan 60x30deg zone by less than 2s, in game it takes around 5 seconds
@СергейНикольский-я2ц I'm just sad that US once again doesn't get tech it invented first. I mean Japan made it first but regardless Japan and US have used AESA since 1995-1998. Mean while the rafale wasn't even introduced until 2001. Su 34 wasnt released until 2014!!! USA should have f22 and f35 before that! With full AESA, DAS, and datalink capabilities. And Aim9x and Aim120c-10 or D
@@derekholdeman4461you have the fucking f15e
Wassup lee?
I’m not late this time 🗣️🔥
Literally first LOL
rafale is king 👑
France reallys get overloved
Rafale is overall better in the perspective of muti-role
And i must remind people that Gaijin steal the thrust from EF and gave it to Rafale
This amount of copium xD "steal the thrust of EF and gave it to Rafale" hahaha wtf
Is there any word on the IRST issues getting fixed with the euro fighter and other plans that are suffering from it going and messing up radar locks?
i like the look of the rafale over EF but neither interest me to grind for.
Where are you getting the SEP/turn rate graphs?
Statshark.net!!!
@@GeneralLee2000 I could take those values with a grain of salt though. They are very unreliable especially with Eurocanard. They do give good comparaisons (between eurocanard, and between regular planes, not very much between eurocanard and other planes), but the actual values are often not realistic
Makes no sense to give this and the other new jets MAW but not any others that were equipped with it.
Which ones had MAWS and didn't get it equipped?
Now fix eurofighters radar
уже чинят, сделали скорость обновления целей нормальной.
@@tvcat5847 its still bs. its probably one, if not the best mechanical radar even able to mimic some aesa functions, but somehow in the game its pretty slow, tracking all the time ghosts and cant maintain a tws lock. Its just garbage right now, even the ICE got better radar.
Not all Eurofighters have AESA radars. The Captor-E radar is the AESA model, put on the most modern EF-2000s.
@@therealavenger3537 Whats your Point?
@@therealavenger3537 у Германии самій мощній АФАР в мире.
In real life Brimstone is fire and forget and multiple firings. No realism for Brits though.
I can't get the decal......😢😢
@@Hamham-i8l why not? 👀
@ it leads me to the store and that's it.... is it because I am using my phone?
@@Hamham-i8l you should have a 3 percent discount on everything? If you do it's working. You need to buy something, even if it's 1 buck.
@@GeneralLee2000 ohh okay! I thought the decal was free lol. Merry Christmas and happy new year!! Love your vids
Hell yeah
how do i get the decal the link just takes me to the shop great vid btw
Buy something
Release the AN-APG 63V2/V3
Should already be in game on the F15c. They’ll probably update it soon.
@@Likeaworm Should already be in game for the F-15E, the F-15C doesn't need it, Gaijin likely wouldn't keep it at that BR if it got it. The F-15E needs it because this Rafale and the Eurofighter both have (will have) much better radars then the current F-15Es radar.
@@aflyingcowboy31no f15’s need any buffs
@@jaek__ considering both the Eurofighter and Rafale will have much better radars then the F15E, yes it does.
@@aflyingcowboy31 no they don’t, the f15s are plenty competitive at the moment, and the rafale is the only one with a truly better radar the ef2000 and f15’s radars really are interchangeably better
How is your radar able to go to 70km mine is stuck at 37
There's a control to increase radar range :)
Don’t tell me u have top tier and haven’t used radar controls at least once
@@141menace I’ve used everything but irst and scale
gib Su-30SM wit R-37M thank
It’s not a buff because rafale irl have 8 missile
Seems good, nerf the F15E
rafale get buff afther buff and others nerf...
Eurofighters got their radar buffed, with more to come. SU27s have been buffed massively. What has been nerfed since this update? And dont say Eurofighter because that flightmodel on the dev was bullshit just like the f15E when it came out
@@jessegm1 they are in full copium mode. I didn't see a single nerf of the EF since the release but they are completely delusional.
BRUH
The frogs always cry... For everything... So when the eurofighter gets the 8 amraams and 2 aim9s?
Complaining about crying babies and doing so like a crying baby!
You outdid the French on that one.
@@jeanvaljean9293 I hoped that everyone understands my comment, but i see there are crazy people always. Im not complaining. Im perfectly fine how is the Eurofighter rn, only the radar and irst bug is the problem. I dont care about the missiles bc 6 of them is perfectly fine. (Would be good if we could carry 8? Yes. But i dont give a shit.)
Dont try to be smart when you are not even understand the comment. Take a step back and think before you start replying.
@@MrStrafeMan The things is that if Gaijongers just said "It will only carry 6 due to balancing" it would be fine but the blunderfools that work at that office do absolutley fuck all or make up stuff. The Rafale can carry 8 and therefore should be able to do so in-game unless they state stuff like balance
@@xlgapelsin6173 The reason i said that the Frogs cried for it, is that i read some posts and i found informations about the version what we have ingame. And looks like it should carry only 6 mica. Probably the Rafale M can carry 8 or somehing. But bc of that, i guess mot of us believed that gaijin is gonna leave the rafale and the eurofighter with only 6x ARH, and then we got a better version with 8 or even more if possible.
They can model an AESA but not the CAPTOR on the eurofighter. They should give the eurofighter the double AIM-120 pylons if they want to give the rafale more missiles
God forbid the Rafale gets the same amount of missiles as the other 2 14.0s am I right?
Crazy me-me-me logic in this one.
@@michaels9739 The rafale F3 has 6 missiles IRL
@@michaels9739 The eurofighter has a sea harrier radar as a placeholder still in it
@@LeAoZiM024 It can carry as many radar missiles as the F-15E and F-15I while being nearly as fast and being much more maneuverable
How do you stay in tws and still switch targets? About to unlock this plane.