Tap Conductor Sizing

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 24 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 33

  • @travellingchief6574
    @travellingchief6574 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Man, you are good at this. I couldn't get over how well you can write backwards.. OR your magic trick for however you did that. Thanks for your content. Big help.

  • @malayekk6522
    @malayekk6522 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks a bunch for simplifying this code requirement. Please do more videos, especially voltage drop based on new math in CEC2024

  • @starlapenner
    @starlapenner ปีที่แล้ว

    I felt really overwhelmed by the wording of all of this in class. I was so relieved when I found your video! Thank you!

    • @ZackHartle
      @ZackHartle  ปีที่แล้ว

      Glad it was helpful!

  • @brianwright6949
    @brianwright6949 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great video! Thanks for breaking this down, I’m in tradeschool and this helped me a lot in my code class.

  • @afkcpu7762
    @afkcpu7762 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    better taught than a 4 hour "lecture"... thank you so much

    • @ZackHartle
      @ZackHartle  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Glad it was helpful!

  • @abdualchaban5508
    @abdualchaban5508 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    easy to understand great explanations right on point thanks for your effort

  • @kylem420
    @kylem420 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks brother, you’re the man!!👍

  • @jimmyduca
    @jimmyduca 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Exactly, that is what I need. Thank you very much!😄

    • @ZackHartle
      @ZackHartle  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      You're very welcome. Thanks for watching!

  • @brimmedHat
    @brimmedHat 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    This comment is for anyone using the CSA Exam Prep app, yes indeed they app get the sizing wrong because it bases its calculation off the splitter ampacity, not the conductor supplying it.(Question ID 1510)
    I believe Zack's interpretation is correct.

    • @ZackHartle
      @ZackHartle  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      But you're saying this video is correct?

    • @brimmedHat
      @brimmedHat 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ZackHartle Seems like it to me, but I'm jsut an apprentice. The app fails to use to conductor sized for the splitter and rather uses the splitter ampacity. Sorry about the ambiguity, I'll reword my comment.

  • @ltesla257
    @ltesla257 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The Goat

  • @michealgoudarzi6893
    @michealgoudarzi6893 28 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Dear Zack, thank you for such a nice videos.
    I have a question:
    How an overcurrent device which is set more than an ampacity of a wire can protect the wire?
    Please let me know .
    Additionally, why didn't you use 80% equipment rated as in question doesn't mentioned it is continuous or non-continuous?
    Thx in advance.

  • @sawyerseguin2244
    @sawyerseguin2244 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    How does this rule apply if we are feeding the splitter with parallel conductors?

  • @ronaldkovacs7080
    @ronaldkovacs7080 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    How was the max 70 amp OCPD determined for the first tap example?

  • @geoffwilson9273
    @geoffwilson9273 ปีที่แล้ว

    If you know the loads, how do you size the feeders to the splitter?

  • @stephancupido3790
    @stephancupido3790 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Do these calculations still hold up today?

  • @jasonh8542
    @jasonh8542 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    aaaaaaaaand ... SUBSCRIBED!

    • @ZackHartle
      @ZackHartle  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Excellent! Thanks for watching!

  • @abouzarfallah7012
    @abouzarfallah7012 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    As you said in countinious brach circuit, we need to divide load amp by 0.8 and then use table2. But you didn't in this example. Can I ask why?

    • @ZackHartle
      @ZackHartle  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I guess I am treating all these as Non-continous loads. I should have been more clear

  • @lucasorgan8363
    @lucasorgan8363 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    What if your equipment was temp specified at 60/75 degrees? but still feeding a load less then 100AMP ?
    thank you in advance

    • @ZackHartle
      @ZackHartle  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Then you just make sure you use the appropriate column in Table 2 or 4 when sizing your conductor.

  • @hub9722
    @hub9722 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hi, why overcurrent is 70A? Thanks.

    • @ZackHartle
      @ZackHartle  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      It would just be the maximum size permitted by the CE code. I have a few videos on OC sizing.
      th-cam.com/video/Ur-7OO43WPg/w-d-xo.html
      th-cam.com/video/XKiS-tjeSpU/w-d-xo.html

    • @ihategoogleplus490
      @ihategoogleplus490 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ZackHartle If the breaker is only rated for 70 A, shouldn't the downstream wire meet or exceed that rating too? For example if the 60 A load was defective and drew more than expected, wouldn't the wire melt before the breaker could protect it?

    • @ZackHartle
      @ZackHartle  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@ihategoogleplus490 It could, but the CE code does allow you in certain situations to have an overcurrent larger than the wire.
      I have a few conductor sizing videos that cover this a bit

    • @ihategoogleplus490
      @ihategoogleplus490 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ZackHartle Yes, sorry just saw your linked video. It points to Table 13 which says for conductor ampacity of 61-70 A, a 70 A breaker is permitted. In this case for 65 A a 70 A breaker is permitted. Sorry for the confusion!