Go to ground.news/Hampton to break free from media manipulation and stay informed on breaking news. Subscribe through my link for 50% off unlimited access this month.
So basically you’re saying to suck on their boots huh? And then ya tell us not to reach around and then ya tell us to record the interaction. Well don’t ya think the fiddling with the phone constitutes movement that could be fearsome to a paranoid piggy? Your confusing us man, ya say not to do and they ya say do.
laws are the opposite of freedom countries/states are cages laws are chains governments are wardens military/police are guards the masses are kept domesticated slaaves to serve the ruling class/perpetuate the enslaavement creation of government creates a ruling class - this is an extension, refinement of 'kingdoms, empires, dynasties" - slaaves becames 'serfs' became 'subjects' became 'citizens'
The secret Good and Plenty clause, written backwards in Esperanto, with invisible ink. Common mistake to forget about it. They tend to keep quiet about its importance for obvious reasons.
@glennwhis There were no "cops" when the bill of rights was adopted. "Cops" are nothing more than a group of people who got together and told the public that they are in charge of you. And also told the public that they can not create their own group of cops.
I don't remember the part in the Constitution that says you're not allowed to bear arms if you had a glass of wine with your dinner. End qualified immunity. sue every single time.
If i ever become governor i am adopting a policy that if ANY cop disarms ANY citizen or appears on youtube in any video of negative capacity they will automatically be fired and lose their credentials in my state
I would say that most are not that, but I think you only have to deal with the dredge of society for so long before you become jaded and suspicious. You ever walked up to someone’s car at night not being able to see in?
@@terryhsley3808 True!! But people are IGNORANT and got CONDITIONED to PAY & REGISTER vehicles…. while we have THE RIGHT TO TRAVEL FREELY…. and that “DRIVING LICENSE” and “ CAR REGISTRATION “ is used against The Second Amendment.. ** The right of a citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon, by horsedrawn carriage, wagon, or automobile, is not a mere privilege which may be permitted or prohibited at will, but a common right which he has under his right to life, liberty and the pursuit ofhappiness.
freedom is a concept that needs more talk and understanding, most do not understand it the constitution and specifically the bill of rights is an expression of the parameters required for an INDIVIDUAL to have freedom they are representative of inborn, inalienable, nature rights that ALL humans of the earth have, and the removal of such rights is what takes away freedom autonomy, free will, are supressed, subverted, in society/civilization (which is based on enslaavement of humans and control of them, the land, the resources on the land which people depend to live - free to live on the earth is a concept to consider and process towards)
@ I don’t need to read.. I already read more than most people!! There could be no RIGHT to a commodity at the expense of OTHERS’ RIGHTS! It simple, it’s BIBLICAL! The GIFT OF CHARITY is what we are SUPPOSED TO DO, but not at the “gun point “ of GOVERNMENT!
I was recently pulled over for speeding, after the explanation of why i got pulled over, he asked me if i had any weapons, to which i responded "I have my legal handgun in the car" just out of habit i turned in the direction of my weapon and he said " Now dont reach for yours and i wont reach for mine, just tell me where it is." I did and he was happy with that. He told me to slow down and have a good night. God i love living in Indiana. Keep up the great work bruddah
One of the reasons I chose not to move to Texas is that signs prohibiting firearms carry the force of law behind them, even for private retail businesses. That’s total BS. If I walk into Costco here in Nevada with a firearm and ignore their sign, they can tell me to leave, but have no legal recourse whatsoever unless I refuse to leave, then it’s only a trespassing. In Texas, proper signage at a business entrance has the force of law, so if I walk into Costco and ignore it, I can immediately be arrested. Such an atrocious anti-second amendment law, in a state that is allegedly, supposedly a pro-gun state.
@@buyaj7693 You are correct. Being asked to leave does not appy to prohibited places by law. If that's all that happens you'd be lucky, it's usally cops and bracelets if it's listed in law. It's the same in FL.
sane deal in FL you are only told to leave, but the new close to constutitional carry, federal law if your found with weapon 1000 from school even driving buy if you dont have the permit renewal is 57 bucks for 7 yrs but also allows you to walk in the gun store and after the instant check your deliverd the weapon no permit travel back after 3 days so a businessman who has weapon and it breaks and tomorrow your going to transport jewlrey to your 2nd store and have been robbed your vulnerable . bad law in fl even accidental display say you trip and coat flys open and cop sees it its a felony good were allowed a safe warning shot prohipited by law a smaller list than some states but dont forget . one part in PA my old state all courthouses by law must have lockboxes at the public entrances and low cost for permit
@@remocres Dude, if you're in FL support HB 31. Removes a lot of language in our hodgepodge if then therefores. Cuts it so much cleaner and less confrontational in just doing what we do everyday. Funny, I have a friend from PA who won't even go back for weddings or funerals in his home state because of their laws and lack of pre-emption (though that may have changed).
0:04 “We have a second amendment right to bear arms, the problem…” that we have allowed states and municipalities to override a federal amendment, stating “shall not be infringed“. They will chip away at this until you are simply not allowed to have a firearm.
@@jamespattan5653 I have read the entire second amendment. Is very clear. I am not “cherry picking”, but it does seem like certain states are cherry picking. Well, regulated refers to a well equipped militia. The militia is the people, not an army. Security of a free state refers to security against government tyranny. My argument is still valid.
@@jamespattan5653 the right of the people….its the crucial part. A well regulated militia means a well armed and trained. The statement covers the reasoning behind the amendment. Shall not be infringed means the government has no right to interfere, period
That’s what I was thinking too (and asked ^) Field sobrieties are so subjective.. not everyone is well balanced sober or not, or even standing on one leg, for whatever reason
True, never give evidence against yourself. FST are evidence gathering tools. I openly refuse to do FST. Loosing license for a year is way better than a DUI. I do not drink, but there are many people in jail who do not and was not drinking because of a failed FST.
@@marcrud1250 Your Lawyer would probably tell you different. You realize those tests are designed for you to fail and just used as a pretext for the cop to search you and start looking inside of your now open car door for anything he can use to arrest you .... right?
@_Coffee4Closers You (myself especially) Never submit to any sobriety tests... Even high school kids know this. Cut straight to the breathalyzer because, I know that shuts it down when I blew ZERO. ZERO.....
In some cases, you're damned if you do, and damned if you don't. Take the recent example of a man in Florida who was legally carrying a concealed handgun and was stopped for a traffic violation. According to the media reporting, he was not required by law to declare that he was carrying, but he voluntarily made the declaration to the police officer. She ordered him out of the car, of course, and did a pat-down before acting to disarm him during the stop. The police spokesman says, "The weapon discharged," shooting the man in the leg. Yeah, all by itself, riiight...
How about the young man killed in his own home because he was answering the door while armed... the cops never gave him a chance to put the weapon down.
Police read from the card so they are 100% sure (and you are 100% sure) that your rights have been read correctly. Government doesn’t want the charge thrown out because the officer misplaced a word or read them incorrectly. I see nothing wrong with police dotting their i’s and crossing their t’s.
@@OctaneExpress we should publish and carry with us copies of the laws , rights and court rulings that preserve our rights to carry, and restrictions on gov that prevent them from any illegal search and seizure! Pass cops copies when necessary!
Business' that prohibit the carry of a weapon in their establishment are also subject to law suits for not providing enough protection/security is you are injured while not having your weapon. This means that the security needs to be equal or better to what I can provide myself. No mall cop will ever come close to that standard.
@@ianstradian and what are you going to do if your attacker has been drinking and points his weapon at you or the crowd in the bar where you are partying with your family or friends. You saying your right to save yourself no longer matters? Remember the big mass shooting at the ~~~ bar in Florida ! We don’t give our right to breath nor to live just because we have a glass of wine! Maybe we have a designated driver who is our designated body guard ? This is not in the 2A … or is it?
@@ianstradian so what if u are attacked by a drinking assailant while having a glass with your family at anniversary or New Year's party in public ( or private) ? How r u going to defend against deadly attack?
Couple of interesting points. In Tennessee, the posted business laws says that in order to be a lawfully posted building, EVERY entrance to that building must be posted. In the early oughts, I used to work at a mall. I was a closer at the business I worked at and would regularly carry bank deposits to the bank. The mall was posted at all entrances except ONE. I would use that entrance every time, with a small pocket pistol on my person. I went by that mall a few months ago, and while the original businesses are long gone, but the door remains unposted. A few years ago, I got pulled over for speeding. As I was flipping through my ID'S for my license, the county deputy saw my carry permit. "You got your firearm on you?" "Yes." "Where's it at?" "Uh, it's on my left hip." "Why didn't you tell me about it?" "Well, you didn't ask." "You need to tell a police officer you're carrying a firearm as soon as they approach your window." "Ma'am, that's actually not what the law says. I am intimately familiar with what the Tennessee state law says about disclose, and I have fully complied to the letter of the law." What the law says is if an officer explicitly asks you if you're possessing a firearm, you are required to tell them. There is zero duty to volunteer that information on your own. She wasn't happy, but she knew I was right. And surprisingly let me off with a verbal warning on the speeding.
I must say, The Constitution says Nothing about Purchasing Permission to carry my own defense weapon from the very people I intend to defend myself against.
Oh, we're way beyond that. We've allowed them to chip away at this so much.Just like taxes, we've allowed them to get this far, there's no going back, we b**** about this.We b**** about that, but we never actually do anything about it it's getting to the point where you're in some states.You can't even defend yourself unless you want to end up in jail
When cops ask "Do you have a weapon in the vehicle" why can't you just answer. "I don't answer questions". Or "I'm exercising my 5th amendment right not to answer questions". Also what sane person would agree to do a field sobriety test? I would only ever agree to a blood test at a hospital. I'm not leaving my future up to the opinion of an officer on how well I walk. I've had serious back injuries so I already don't walk so well, but I don't have any problems driving.
it's called "duty to report" and is subtly included in a lot of law language, for various things. In my state, in a traffic stop with a cpl/ccw the paperwork you signed to get that cpl/ccw says you have a duty to and WILL report. Additionally and similar, when you apply for a drivers license, in most if not all states, in the paperwork you sign that you are preemptively agreeing to submit bac/urine sample if suspected of a dui under penalty of default suspension of your license for a year
My personal feeling is if the situation is serious enough that you have to remove your weapon from it's holster you have to use it. A firearm is not for warning or intimidation, they have one singular purpose.
@@larryfinley9221 If someone is thoughtful about future possible litigation then they probably aren't in a situation where they need to draw their weapon and defend themselves. There are consequences for carrying a firearm and also for not carrying one. If 'dead' is preferable to possibly going to prison then don't carry. The reasonable man rule is about sound judgement, anyone who lacks that shouldn't carry a firearm anyway.
@@bdub0983 just let them assume that all persons they encounter have right to carry, and we have not shot anyone today , so what are they worried about? They are armed. They have body armor. Cameras. Dogs, & radios and backup , helicopters and swat! They still afraid to talk to a person who lawfully carries and has done no harm! Maybe they should keep on trucking stop no one or flip burgers if they are afraid of the general public !
11:53 "make sure you get out slowly. You move very slowly ..." And since a cop can turn absolutely everything into suspicion he'll happily say you were lethargic and therefore impaired. 🍺 I love that you used Tayvin Galanakis in this video. The cops intrepreted his 💯 normal movements in the car as uncoordinated and impaired. His perfectly normal speech as slurred. There was zero he could have done to avoid arrest.
32% of Americans own a gun. So majority doesn't. I suspect that majority may not want to see your gun in the public building. Please, think about this. Minority shouldn't push their views on the majority.
@@UtseuskiOur civil rights are not subject to majority consent. Blacks are not a majority, and I’m sure many people feel uncomfortable around blacks; so, by your logic, perhaps they should be prohibited from public buildings as well.
@@Utseuski To me, THAT says only 32% ADMIT to owning a firearm. It's no one else's BUSINESS if I own a firearm, and IF you ask me, I'll deny it. YOU'RE in the "minority" here, sir.
@@UtseuskiAnd the majority don't have the right to push their views on the minority either. We live in a constitutional Republic. I guess you missed the part that stated building paid for by tax payers. Minority rights don't end where majority begin.
I could not even get past your first one without laughing. Not surprising coming from an attorney. On the first one, you would state I don’t answer questions. And you never submit to any test.
Get out of the car and lock the doors with the keys visible inside. I keep a spare hidden under the car so no problem getting back into the car after the officer leaves.
Does that include giving a president a free pass on breaking the law while he’s in office, lol? If something’s not written in black and white in the US Constitution, then the SCOTUS shouldn’t say that it’s implied! That’s the kind of thing that will come back to bite the Court before it’s over!
From a legal perspective, it is different depending on what state you live in. For instance in IL, municipal parks are prohibited places, state parks are not prohibited, buildings in state parks are prohibited, county forest preserves are not prohibited, but Cook County forest preserves are prohibited. Confusing enough?
and people are being manipulated to call for more authoritarianism and control-systems freedom does not come in a cage with walls, with more surveillance, requirements for "ID" and consequences for not providing when shown, etc.
In Pennsylvania they know if you got a carriers permit from the plate reader. My buddy got pulled over at midnight, cop demanded his gun and permit. Cop came back with a bad attitude confiscated his gun and told him he will be charged with a felony for having a fake carriers permit. The loser cop typed in his permit number wrong that came back to another person in a different county. My buddy went to the police station and demanded his gun back. At least they apologized for screwing everything up
@johnleca handguns bought in PA are registered. But if you have some other unregistered ones you got when you lived in a red state. If they run your serial number and it comes back to nobody's name. Cops will take it and keep it for themselves or give it to their family members. I've seen it happen. I've also had 4000 rds stolen from me from Cops then deny they ever took it
@@brettcatterall7761 Interesting I am an ex Philly pig and have encountered firearms that did not come back with specific owner information. Unless the serial number comes back with an NCIC/PCIC hit it stays with the owner or if the serial number is obliterated then I would have taken it. It sounds like you encountered pig cops that are thieves and criminals. Always file a written complaint although pigs investigating pigs usually results in nothing BUT it may generate a paper trail or contribute. Merry Christmas.
I've had that happen to me. I've NEVER surrendered my weapon. I always called for a sergeant or lieutenant. Higher ranking officer shows up and tells me to have a nice day and I'm free to go.
An estimated 250,000 civilian injuries are caused by law enforcement officers annually. More than 600 innocent people are killed by law enforcement in the U.S. each year.
do not consent to searches & seizures. do not consent to field sobriety tests ever. do not answer questions. invoke your right to remain silent & right to an attorney if questioned.
There are quite a few lawyers that make videos similar to yours. Yours cover the best subjects, are clear, concise, and offer the best advice. Very well done.
A Conceal carry license is a permission slip you volunteered for to give up your right to keep and bear arms. Also, any law that says you can only carry in this place or time is a violation of the 2nd. Having to treat the police with kid gloves only for them to be able to beat, kill and violate your rights without any recourse shows we all live in Police States.
It does more than that. It informs the officer that you have passed a Criminal Background check and are not a criminal. They usually relax and stop fishing for suspension at that point.
Here in KY you don't need a permit. If you can legally own a gun and over 21, you can carry concealed and you don't have to immediately inform an officer.
I don't need a permit in Florida either. But there are still good reasons to have one. Weapons like clubs, long knives and slungshots (not a typo) are legal to have with a permit. Still illegal without. @@hillbillytarzan
I am so glad that in Indiana the sign does not carry the force of law. All they can do is ask you to leave. If you don't they can call the cops on you for trespassing.
The thing is, asking someone "Do you have weapons" is a massive trick question because there is no way to answer it. If you say "yes" you've gone and done it, and if you say "no" they are "trained not to believe you." Do an episode on that dilemma Mr. Lawbertarian
It’s best to paint a picture of normality for them so they don’t think you’ve recently lost your mind and out there looking for trouble. “Officer, I regularly carry protection and yes it’s on me right now. I’m not going to reach anywhere near it. I carry it in a holster on my right hip under my shirt.” It’s a little better than “yes”. Then they know the what, where and why. Eliminate questions before they have to ask them. You’ve even given them the “when”. Always. I always have it. It’s not that I’m out here angrily carrying something just tonight.
Yes, at %:30 on "brandishing a firearm". The bit you quoted says " ..., or otherwise make the presence of a firearm known to another person to intimidate that person, regardless of whether the firearm is directly visible to that person". So simply telling someone that you have a gun, or having a "weapons on board" sign would suffice.
They need to take away these businesses ability to limit concealed carry on their premise. Shouldn't be considered private property if they're conducting public business. All that junk is infringement of the 2nd
Business' that prohibit the carry of a weapon in their establishment are also subject to law suits for not providing enough protection/security is you are injured while not having your weapon. This means that the security needs to be equal or better to what I can provide myself. No mall cop will ever come close to that standard.
Yeah, here's the deal. There is no such thing as a privately owned central bank in a functioning republic. The USA has been a lawless kakistocracy since 1913.
On the brandishing issue, when we lived in Seattle, I exited I-5 and pulled into a gas station. When I pulled up to the pump, a car drove up and stopped immediately behind us. It was only me and my infant daughter in her car seat. A guy, red-faced and yelling got out of the other vehicle with a pistol in his hand. He brought the pistol up, and holding it in two hands, he started screaming about me cutting him off. Had I cut him off? I don't know. I hadn't seen him or his vehicle in my life. But even if I had, it wasn't intentional. Why would i risk my child's life, my life, and the lives of other people on the interstate? What was definitely intentional was that he was pointing a pistol at me and the car that my child was sleeping in. He could've yelled at me. He could've cursed me. He could've taken down my license plate and reported it to the police. Instead, what was his go to? To threaten my life. My experience with firearms began at FT Benning, and what was one of the first things that the drill sergeants taught us? "Do not point your weapon at anyone that you don't want to kill." Was that his intention? I explained to him that I hadn't seen his car, and some other people at the pumps said that the police were on their way. He got back into his car, called me an asshole, and drove off. Almost twenty years later, I'm still angry at that cowardly punk.
@@pilgrimwings1295 I enjoyed my time in service, and no, I didn't think about getting his number. I was worried about the baby. I'm grateful for the other people at the pumps. Their bluff scared him off.
@@tangotango256 Thank you for your service as well. I went through infantry OSUT at Harmony Church the summer of 1979. I was never stationed there, but I was stationed at FT Stewart years later.
All that sounds really good. I have a question for you: When our second amendment apply and obey the law of the land protected for the people by the people? Since when codes and statuses take superiority over the Constitution of the United States of America? The truth is corporate policy are not law and if they presumed to be law they are colorable law and never been ratified. These advices are nothing but compliance to foreign officers paid by the county to violate our rights. No one have the authorityto rule over another man if he or she is not his property or his slave. Under the law of the land, we all are equal and ones would have more rights or power over another.
How does a person reconcile his/her second, fourth and fifth amendment rights in a shall notify state such as North Carolina? In NC if you have a concealed carry license, you have a duty to notify. It’s a bit hard to navigate imo. I have a 5th to remain silent and not speak or answer any questions but am I in violation of my CCW if I evoke the 5th from the go? Do I suspend my 5th solely by possessing a ccw? I personally don’t like the idea of notifying because of how it immediately becomes exponentially more dangerous and tense the moment a weapon is mentioned in even the most casual and friendly encounters. I do however worry if I’m actually breaking the law or just in violation of my ccw and how it works with my civil rights.
It's a great legal question that demands clarification. If one's First Amendment to conscious objections is inalienable; then why, and for what reason, is the Second Amendment claimed by Gov to not be inalienable?
You should NEVER HAVE TO REACH FOR ANYTHING IN YOUR CAR! ALWAYS keep your insurance, registration and driver license strapped to your drivers side visor. When pulled over, be certain to keep your hands on the wheel, eyes front. When the oinker asks for your info, simply reach up and take it from the visor and hand it over and put your hands back on the steering wheel. In my state, there is no need to tell the oinker I am carrying a gun. I will refuse to answer even if he asks. ALWAYS KEEP YOUR MOUTH SHUT AND INVOKE YOUR FIFTH AMENDMENT RIGHT TO REMAIN SILENT. NEVER CONSENT TO A SEARCH OF ANYTHING. PUT THAT OINKER IN HIS PLACE AND KEEP HIM THERE!
Your response tells all you just hate the police. In all my stops but one I received the ticket I deserved and it was a professional attitude and a friendly one.
We don't have a right to defend ourselves. If we did, there woud be few prohibited areas. In some cities, the entire city is one huge prohibited area, partly because of school zones.
*Kinda funny (not really) that if you’re carrying in a state where “Open Carry” is legal so you don’t have a concealed permit, and your firearm is partially covered you can be charged with carrying a concealed weapon, at the same time if the exact same thing is true, except that you do have a concealed permit but ”Open Carry” is not legal, that partially covered firearm is not being concealed, it is being carried openly*
No business under the law of public accommodation has the right to tell me I lose my RIGHTS by entering their premises that serves and depends on the public for revenue.
I just got charged with an aggravated dui & I told the officer I had a loaded handgun. I handed it to her & she put it in the back seat after the stop. No charges on the gun.
Signs mean nothing in oklahoma unless the type of location is prohibited by law (govt building, certain arena, bar) 5:20 I haven't done that since 91😂😂
By your definition of "brandishing," if you were to reach for something on an upper shelf at a store and your canceled pistol, PRINTED, some Karen could report you saying that she felt threatened by the presence of your pistol. Or as you reached into your pocket to get your money, she saw your spare magazine and wanted to be a bitch, she again could report that she felt threatened. Even if you honored that sign at the door and left your gun in a lockbox in the trunk of your car.
Yes. One man in Virginia some 45 or so years ago put his hand in his empty pocket and told the person he was talking to that he, the man with the hand in the pocket, had a gun. He didn't but was arrested, charged, tried, and sent to jail over it. It was classified as brandishing. When a cop comes up to you and puts his hand on his gun, that is brandishing, a crime if a consensual conversation is going on. The laws were written by socialist progressives and enforced by socialist progressives, in most cases. We know them as Democrars, in my opinion. Welcome to America! And, Merry Christmas!
Everyone who can afford it, and even those who can’t, should have a lawyer at their fingertips and with technology and apps like attorney shield and lawyers on retainer, having a lawyer at your fingertips to interact with the police for you is CLUTCH
That depends where you are. Here in Arkansas you're only legally required to tell officers you're carrying if you have a CHCL (we also have constitutional carry). If you have no CHCL your only answer should be "I don't answer questions." Consult with a local lawyer about anything before trying it
Better off just getting the CCP. I lived in Arkansas for 40 years and the cops never gave me any issues while carrying, as long as I handed the CCL over with my DL. As I've also pointed out, it additionally helps to cover the carrying of non-firearm weapons.
I have a question. If I am on private property or a business like Walmart and something happens that put my life in danger and I could not defend myself because of the posted sign saying I couldn’t carry even though I have a license to carry does that make them liable and can I sue them for putting me in danger? In my opinion their actions caused me to rely on them for safety.
I have never seen a 51% sign, and have often wondered how a citizen is supposed to know that an establishment makes more than 50% of its income from the sale of alcoholic beverages. It makes sense that a sign should be required before a firearms carrier could be charged. Maybe I just don’t actually visit such establishments?
My answer to if I know why i was pulled over is, "No. I'm guessing that maybe a taillight has gone out on me?" Ball is now in their court to explain why they pulled me over. Not a confession nor an admission of my knowledge of any situation.
QUESTION: If I have a cased unloaded firearm in the trunk of my car, does this affect my duty to disclose? Is there a way to keep the police out of my trunk for a search if I have to disclose?
There used to be a saying my dad said when talking about traffic laws. I think it applies to dealing with police as well. "Here lies John, dead as a nail. John was in the right. Here lies John."
Mine had a better one Here lies the body of Michael O’ Day. He died maintaining his right of way. His way was right & his will was strong but he’s just as dead as if he’d been wrong.
You sir, are one DAMN FINE attorney. When you said "the odor of an alcoholic beverage" in the beginning... only cops and ESQ's know that. Speaking from years of professional experience in these areas.
Even if you’re required to notify the police that you’re carrying a firearm in a state that requires you to do so, the requirement to notify does not trump the 5th amendment against self incrimination. You can simply say you don’t wish to answer any questions and actively invoke your right to remain silent. Later in court after being charged with failure to notify you can make the argument that you were unsure of your exact location and therefore did not wish to incriminate yourself by violating a state statute if you were in possession of a firearm in a prohibited location. For instance it’s illegal to drive with a firearm in Florida within 1000 of a school zone. If you are unsure of how far away you are from a school zone and pulled over for a traffic stop, you can reasonably invoke your right to remain silent regardless of a state’s law requiring you to notify the officer you have a firearm.
@@Johnfisher12345 It is always a reasonable defense to remain silent, even in duty to inform states, when you risk self-incrimination. It's certainly a gray area, but I'm sure a lawyer would prefer you to shut up and say nothing over informing, finding out your are actually in an area you can't carry, and now you have a felony charge. If you say nothing, the cop doesn't know if you are carrying or not and they can't search you unless certain things apply - don't give them legal reason to search and it doesn't matter if you are carrying illegal or not.
@@Johnfisher12345 your duty to inform never trumps a constitutional right against self incrimination. If it did the fifth amendment would be meaningless.
So, in Florida, law enforcement can not ask about a firearm. But, I’ve always thought if I was pulled over I would inform them that I am carrying. Should I not inform them? If they pull me, they would already know that I have a carry license. What should a person do? My thinking is that it would be thoughtful of me to inform them that I am carrying.
@@davidclaycomb5496 Don't tell them. I'm in GA . No duty to inform either. Hand documents. ( DL, insurance, registration) Invoke your 5th and shut up. If they ask you to exit who gives a sht ! Lock your doors and fst are voluntary there should be no legal RAS or PC bc you're not drinking and right ? If you are QUIT DRINKING AND DRIVING ! It's all really pretty simple if you don't let them intimidate you.
Disclosure varies from state to state. Some states require you to immediately tell the officer at a traffic stop that you are armed. Others only require to answer truthfully if the officer asks. Personally, I keep my drivers license and carry permit together and I disclose immediately and say it’s on my right hip. It puts the officer at ease and he is usually grateful for your candor.
@ I live in a south eastern Red State town with deputies that are happy to be working in a safe , crime free town. Traffic citations, fender benders and occasional drunks. Sort of like Mayberry. The deputies are mostly pleasant.
In VT each time I was asked if I have a firearm on me I said yes. Pending wha situation you are in if you are at right vs other guilty party they don't care. Just asked for their safety. Also, we had a private business here that had a sign. No guns allowed, then they took the sign down means either the owner started carrying realizing that something might happen or he possibly might have gotten sued.Regardless the sign is gone.
Only pulled over once in last 10 years in Northern VT. Officer asked if I had a firearm in the vehicle. Asked him which State he came from, because any native VT cop would ask 'How many firearms are in your vehicle?'
Go to ground.news/Hampton to break free from media manipulation and stay informed on breaking news. Subscribe through my link for 50% off unlimited access this month.
So basically you’re saying to suck on their boots huh? And then ya tell us not to reach around and then ya tell us to record the interaction. Well don’t ya think the fiddling with the phone constitutes movement that could be fearsome to a paranoid piggy? Your confusing us man, ya say not to do and they ya say do.
@@hamptonlawfirm thanks for your like that means a lot coming from you. I appreciate your hard work us peons.
Do all these new firearms on premises in private facilities legally stand up to off duty law enforcement as well
Sounds like an argument for discrimination
Man....... You are a Great Lawyer I Wish I live in TEXAS 😊
These gun laws are such BS 😤 if cops can arrest you for carrying your gun , all laws for guns are a infringement
laws are the opposite of freedom
countries/states are cages
laws are chains
governments are wardens
military/police are guards
the masses are kept domesticated slaaves to serve the ruling class/perpetuate the enslaavement
creation of government creates a ruling class - this is an extension, refinement of 'kingdoms, empires, dynasties" - slaaves becames 'serfs' became 'subjects' became 'citizens'
Where in the Constitution does it say that your rights are dependent upon a cops impression?
Police unions lobby for Unconstitutional laws.
The secret Good and Plenty clause, written backwards in Esperanto, with invisible ink.
Common mistake to forget about it. They tend to keep quiet about its importance for obvious reasons.
It doesn't. Alot of cops think they are above you the citizen
@glennwhis There were no "cops" when the bill of rights was adopted. "Cops" are nothing more than a group of people who got together and told the public that they are in charge of you. And also told the public that they can not create their own group of cops.
It's called traffic law.
I don't remember the part in the Constitution that says you're not allowed to bear arms if you had a glass of wine with your dinner. End qualified immunity. sue every single time.
I don’t remember the part of the constitution that says that you can’t bring a firearm to the airport, a school, a courthouse, or on private property.
Laws that violate the constitution are null and void..
Constitutional or not, it remains stupid.
No, not everyone is a drunk.
I know imagine us living in Toddler Nation where we can't even be like a gentleman and have a glass of wine
Too many laws. Too many cops. Too much power from gang members to have authority over you for victimless crimes.
Can not infringe on.
A “victimless crime” isn’t a crime, at all.
But you local politician says “you will be fine, thank you for paying taxes so I get paid to control you 😂.”
The police are organized crime.
Yes Sir the blue sh-t skid mark gang members aka blue line gang are definitely working for the authoritarian scourge government's of America
If cops are so fearful, fragile, and irrationally unpredictable, perhaps they shouldnt be cops.
If i ever become governor i am adopting a policy that if ANY cop disarms ANY citizen or appears on youtube in any video of negative capacity they will automatically be fired and lose their credentials in my state
I would say that most are not that, but I think you only have to deal with the dredge of society for so long before you become jaded and suspicious. You ever walked up to someone’s car at night not being able to see in?
I’m sure the bad guys will obey the no weapons sign.
Of course, they will, and I am sure an order of protection is just as important.
Im sure the cops wont either.... on or off duity
That's the only ones that will have a weapon in those places. They take your ability to protect yourself against someone like that.
the bad guys control the laws and government
According to the constitution, you are not required to pay a fee or obtain a license to exercise a right.
@@terryhsley3808
True!! But people are IGNORANT and got CONDITIONED to PAY & REGISTER vehicles…. while we have THE RIGHT TO TRAVEL FREELY…. and that “DRIVING LICENSE” and “ CAR REGISTRATION “ is used against The Second Amendment..
**
The right of a citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon, by horsedrawn carriage, wagon, or automobile, is not a mere privilege which may be permitted or prohibited at will, but a common right which he has under his right to life, liberty and the pursuit ofhappiness.
freedom is a concept that needs more talk and understanding, most do not understand it
the constitution and specifically the bill of rights is an expression of the parameters required for an INDIVIDUAL to have freedom
they are representative of inborn, inalienable, nature rights that ALL humans of the earth have, and the removal of such rights is what takes away freedom
autonomy, free will, are supressed, subverted, in society/civilization (which is based on enslaavement of humans and control of them, the land, the resources on the land which people depend to live - free to live on the earth is a concept to consider and process towards)
@
You are right!
The ONLY INDIVIDUAL HUMAN RIGHTS ARE LIFE & LIBERTY!! Any COMMODITY-such as FOOD , EDUCATION, MEDICAL CARE.. ARE NOT RIGHTS!
@@AlCatrraz what we have the right to is the pursuit of acquiring those things without being violated to do such
look up "american's creed"
@
I don’t need to read.. I already read more than most people!!
There could be no RIGHT to a commodity at the expense of OTHERS’ RIGHTS! It simple, it’s BIBLICAL!
The GIFT OF CHARITY is what we are SUPPOSED TO DO, but not at the “gun point “ of GOVERNMENT!
I was recently pulled over for speeding, after the explanation of why i got pulled over, he asked me if i had any weapons, to which i responded "I have my legal handgun in the car" just out of habit i turned in the direction of my weapon and he said " Now dont reach for yours and i wont reach for mine, just tell me where it is." I did and he was happy with that. He told me to slow down and have a good night. God i love living in Indiana. Keep up the great work bruddah
It was none of his business. You should have said, "............."
One of the reasons I chose not to move to Texas is that signs prohibiting firearms carry the force of law behind them, even for private retail businesses. That’s total BS. If I walk into Costco here in Nevada with a firearm and ignore their sign, they can tell me to leave, but have no legal recourse whatsoever unless I refuse to leave, then it’s only a trespassing. In Texas, proper signage at a business entrance has the force of law, so if I walk into Costco and ignore it, I can immediately be arrested. Such an atrocious anti-second amendment law, in a state that is allegedly, supposedly a pro-gun state.
I'm non-iconographic so I just carry on.
If you have a license then from my understanding they have to ask you to leave first. But I don't think it applies to 100% prohibited places by law
@@buyaj7693 You are correct. Being asked to leave does not appy to prohibited places by law. If that's all that happens you'd be lucky, it's usally cops and bracelets if it's listed in law. It's the same in FL.
sane deal in FL you are only told to leave, but the new close to constutitional carry, federal law if your found with weapon 1000 from school even driving buy if you dont have the permit renewal is 57 bucks for 7 yrs but also allows you to walk in the gun store and after the instant check your deliverd the weapon no permit travel back after 3 days so a businessman who has weapon and it breaks and tomorrow your going to transport jewlrey to your 2nd store and have been robbed your vulnerable . bad law in fl even accidental display say you trip and coat flys open and cop sees it its a felony good were allowed a safe warning shot prohipited by law a smaller list than some states but dont forget .
one part in PA my old state all courthouses by law must have lockboxes at the public entrances and low cost for permit
@@remocres Dude, if you're in FL support HB 31. Removes a lot of language in our hodgepodge if then therefores. Cuts it so much cleaner and less confrontational in just doing what we do everyday. Funny, I have a friend from PA who won't even go back for weddings or funerals in his home state because of their laws and lack of pre-emption (though that may have changed).
0:04 “We have a second amendment right to bear arms, the problem…” that we have allowed states and municipalities to override a federal amendment, stating “shall not be infringed“. They will chip away at this until you are simply not allowed to have a firearm.
Only way to,fix it is for the people to stop cooperating with their oppression
@@davefletch3063correct, not only noncompliance, but they must re-establish their own authority by stripping the power from police and politicians
You can't just cherry pick parts you like. Read the entire amendment all together.
@@jamespattan5653 I have read the entire second amendment. Is very clear. I am not “cherry picking”, but it does seem like certain states are cherry picking. Well, regulated refers to a well equipped militia. The militia is the people, not an army. Security of a free state refers to security against government tyranny. My argument is still valid.
@@jamespattan5653 the right of the people….its the crucial part. A well regulated militia means a well armed and trained. The statement covers the reasoning behind the amendment. Shall not be infringed means the government has no right to interfere, period
NEVER consent to or do any "field sobriety test"... this guy is a lawyer and should know this.
That’s what I was thinking too (and asked ^)
Field sobrieties are so subjective.. not everyone is well balanced sober or not, or even standing on one leg, for whatever reason
True, never give evidence against yourself. FST are evidence gathering tools. I openly refuse to do FST. Loosing license for a year is way better than a DUI. I do not drink, but there are many people in jail who do not and was not drinking because of a failed FST.
No, I would like to take a breathalyzer and a supervisor please.
@@marcrud1250 Your Lawyer would probably tell you different. You realize those tests are designed for you to fail and just used as a pretext for the cop to search you and start looking inside of your now open car door for anything he can use to arrest you .... right?
@_Coffee4Closers You (myself especially) Never submit to any sobriety tests... Even high school kids know this.
Cut straight to the breathalyzer because, I know that shuts it down when I blew ZERO. ZERO.....
In some cases, you're damned if you do, and damned if you don't. Take the recent example of a man in Florida who was legally carrying a concealed handgun and was stopped for a traffic violation. According to the media reporting, he was not required by law to declare that he was carrying, but he voluntarily made the declaration to the police officer. She ordered him out of the car, of course, and did a pat-down before acting to disarm him during the stop. The police spokesman says, "The weapon discharged," shooting the man in the leg. Yeah, all by itself, riiight...
Also said it wasn’t a police involved shooting even though she shot him with his own gun. She had no clue on safely handling a firearm
@@reddfoxx9019 Yes, exactly. As I mentioned, "The weapon discharged," as if of its own volition.
@@arinerm1331didn't know Megatron was in Florida. That's concerning. Wonder what scheme he's planning.
That's why you never offer the information unless asked. No need for complications during a simple traffic stop.
How about the young man killed in his own home because he was answering the door while armed... the cops never gave him a chance to put the weapon down.
When a cop reads you your rights from a laminated paper, you can be sure they don’t know your constitutional rights
Police read from the card so they are 100% sure (and you are 100% sure) that your rights have been read correctly. Government doesn’t want the charge thrown out because the officer misplaced a word or read them incorrectly. I see nothing wrong with police dotting their i’s and crossing their t’s.
Oh, that's no problem. The judge will just call it a "good faith effort." Because they are never wrong 🙄
There are some that have that committed to memory, but if they are having to read it from a card, I don't think they deserve to be cops.
@@l.clevelandmajor9931 anyone can make a slip up. The use of cards help prevent such fowl ups.
@@OctaneExpress we should publish and carry with us copies of the laws , rights and court rulings that preserve our rights to carry, and restrictions on gov that prevent them from any illegal search and seizure! Pass cops copies when necessary!
Everything in this video needs to be unconstitutional
Business' that prohibit the carry of a weapon in their establishment are also subject to law suits for not providing enough protection/security is you are injured while not having your weapon. This means that the security needs to be equal or better to what I can provide myself. No mall cop will ever come close to that standard.
“The Right of the People to bear arms shall not be infringed.”
25 minute rundown of infringements….
Wish it made sense.
If I’m carrying concealed I will either not consume alcohol or have a single drink…. And I have kept this rule for myself for 20+ years now.
@@ianstradian and what are you going to do if your attacker has been drinking and points his weapon at you or the crowd in the bar where you are partying with your family or friends. You saying your right to save yourself no longer matters? Remember the big mass shooting at the ~~~ bar in Florida !
We don’t give our right to breath nor to live just because we have a glass of wine! Maybe we have a designated driver who is our designated body guard ? This is not in the 2A … or is it?
@@ianstradian so what if u are attacked by a drinking assailant while having a glass with your family at anniversary or New Year's party in public ( or private) ? How r u going to defend against deadly attack?
Couple of interesting points. In Tennessee, the posted business laws says that in order to be a lawfully posted building, EVERY entrance to that building must be posted. In the early oughts, I used to work at a mall. I was a closer at the business I worked at and would regularly carry bank deposits to the bank.
The mall was posted at all entrances except ONE. I would use that entrance every time, with a small pocket pistol on my person. I went by that mall a few months ago, and while the original businesses are long gone, but the door remains unposted.
A few years ago, I got pulled over for speeding. As I was flipping through my ID'S for my license, the county deputy saw my carry permit.
"You got your firearm on you?"
"Yes."
"Where's it at?"
"Uh, it's on my left hip."
"Why didn't you tell me about it?"
"Well, you didn't ask."
"You need to tell a police officer you're carrying a firearm as soon as they approach your window."
"Ma'am, that's actually not what the law says. I am intimately familiar with what the Tennessee state law says about disclose, and I have fully complied to the letter of the law."
What the law says is if an officer explicitly asks you if you're possessing a firearm, you are required to tell them. There is zero duty to volunteer that information on your own.
She wasn't happy, but she knew I was right. And surprisingly let me off with a verbal warning on the speeding.
I must say, The Constitution says Nothing about Purchasing Permission to carry my own defense weapon from the very people I intend to defend myself against.
LOL great reply
Oh, we're way beyond that. We've allowed them to chip away at this so much.Just like taxes, we've allowed them to get this far, there's no going back, we b**** about this.We b**** about that, but we never actually do anything about it it's getting to the point where you're in some states.You can't even defend yourself unless you want to end up in jail
So.. Basically.. Act the same way you would with an unpredictable wild animal.. Got it.
Well said
PA vs Mimms is what the Police use when they get butt hurt because they don't like your answers.
There’s a remedy. When you get stopped get out of your car. They’ll scream at you to get back in the car. Lol
@@karinaz8756 that seems like a bad idea and a good way to get the cop worked up and on edge.
And that ruling has no basis in the constitution
When cops ask "Do you have a weapon in the vehicle" why can't you just answer. "I don't answer questions". Or "I'm exercising my 5th amendment right not to answer questions".
Also what sane person would agree to do a field sobriety test? I would only ever agree to a blood test at a hospital. I'm not leaving my future up to the opinion of an officer on how well I walk. I've had serious back injuries so I already don't walk so well, but I don't have any problems driving.
If you're in a state where you're required to tell them when asked, you've committed a crime if you refuse to answer. Do you really want that?
@@deebee4575then you have no right to remain silent in those states. Make it make sense.
@@deebee4575no state law trumps the constitution.
100%
it's called "duty to report" and is subtly included in a lot of law language, for various things. In my state, in a traffic stop with a cpl/ccw the paperwork you signed to get that cpl/ccw says you have a duty to and WILL report.
Additionally and similar, when you apply for a drivers license, in most if not all states, in the paperwork you sign that you are preemptively agreeing to submit bac/urine sample if suspected of a dui under penalty of default suspension of your license for a year
My personal feeling is if the situation is serious enough that you have to remove your weapon from it's holster
you have to use it. A firearm is not for warning or intimidation, they have one singular purpose.
Absolutely
Maybe. Don’t forget about the reasonable man rule. This is what the jury will be going by.
@@larryfinley9221 If someone is thoughtful about future possible litigation then they probably aren't in a situation where they need to draw their weapon and defend themselves. There are consequences for carrying a firearm and also for not carrying one. If 'dead' is preferable to possibly going to prison then don't carry. The reasonable man rule is about sound judgement, anyone who lacks that shouldn't carry a firearm anyway.
I'm glad I live in a fairly free state. Constitutional carry, no requirement to tell police you have a gun
@@bdub0983 just let them assume that all persons they encounter have right to carry, and we have not shot anyone today , so what are they worried about? They are armed. They have body armor. Cameras. Dogs, & radios and backup , helicopters and swat!
They still afraid to talk to a person who lawfully carries and has done no harm!
Maybe they should keep on trucking stop no one or flip burgers if they are afraid of the general public !
The right to have and bear arms shall not be infringed! Sounds like infringement to me
11:53 "make sure you get out slowly. You move very slowly ..." And since a cop can turn absolutely everything into suspicion he'll happily say you were lethargic and therefore impaired. 🍺
I love that you used Tayvin Galanakis in this video. The cops intrepreted his 💯 normal movements in the car as uncoordinated and impaired. His perfectly normal speech as slurred. There was zero he could have done to avoid arrest.
Any building paid for by taxpayers should not be able to prohibit carrying a firearm. We own the damn thing.
32% of Americans own a gun.
So majority doesn't.
I suspect that majority may not want to see your gun in the public building.
Please, think about this. Minority shouldn't push their views on the majority.
@@UtseuskiOur civil rights are not subject to majority consent. Blacks are not a majority, and I’m sure many people feel uncomfortable around blacks; so, by your logic, perhaps they should be prohibited from public buildings as well.
@@Utseuskithat's not what the constitution says
@@Utseuski To me, THAT says only 32% ADMIT to owning a firearm. It's no one else's BUSINESS if I own a firearm, and IF you ask me, I'll deny it. YOU'RE in the "minority" here, sir.
@@UtseuskiAnd the majority don't have the right to push their views on the minority either. We live in a constitutional Republic. I guess you missed the part that stated building paid for by tax payers. Minority rights don't end where majority begin.
I could not even get past your first one without laughing. Not surprising coming from an attorney. On the first one, you would state I don’t answer questions. And you never submit to any test.
Get out of the car and lock the doors with the keys visible inside. I keep a spare hidden under the car so no problem getting back into the car after the officer leaves.
"All laws repugnant to the Constitution are null and void." -SCOTUS, Marbury v. Madison (1803)
Does that include giving a president a free pass on breaking the law while he’s in office, lol?
If something’s not written in black and white in the US Constitution, then the SCOTUS shouldn’t say that it’s implied! That’s the kind of thing that will come back to bite the Court before it’s over!
Public parks are NOT no gun zones. We absolutely live in a police state.
From a legal perspective, it is different depending on what state you live in. For instance in IL, municipal parks are prohibited places, state parks are not prohibited, buildings in state parks are prohibited, county forest preserves are not prohibited, but Cook County forest preserves are prohibited. Confusing enough?
and people are being manipulated to call for more authoritarianism and control-systems
freedom does not come in a cage with walls, with more surveillance, requirements for "ID" and consequences for not providing when shown, etc.
Valid reason for not getting a concealed carry because they already know if you "might" have a gun before they even stop you.
Facts.
Yup !! as soon as they ding your tag they know
In Pennsylvania they know if you got a carriers permit from the plate reader. My buddy got pulled over at midnight, cop demanded his gun and permit. Cop came back with a bad attitude confiscated his gun and told him he will be charged with a felony for having a fake carriers permit. The loser cop typed in his permit number wrong that came back to another person in a different county. My buddy went to the police station and demanded his gun back. At least they apologized for screwing everything up
Certainly sounds like a gun registration huh?
@johnleca handguns bought in PA are registered. But if you have some other unregistered ones you got when you lived in a red state. If they run your serial number and it comes back to nobody's name. Cops will take it and keep it for themselves or give it to their family members. I've seen it happen. I've also had 4000 rds stolen from me from Cops then deny they ever took it
@@brettcatterall7761 Interesting I am an ex Philly pig and have encountered firearms that did not come back with specific owner information. Unless the serial number comes back with an NCIC/PCIC hit it stays with the owner or if the serial number is obliterated then I would have taken it. It sounds like you encountered pig cops that are thieves and criminals. Always file a written complaint although pigs investigating pigs usually results in nothing BUT it may generate a paper trail or contribute. Merry Christmas.
Thats why you dont give up your rights and ask permission….ever wonder the gangster never has a problem with carrying their guns?
I've had that happen to me. I've NEVER surrendered my weapon. I always called for a sergeant or lieutenant. Higher ranking officer shows up and tells me to have a nice day and I'm free to go.
cops that are scared are guns should get another job
For real I used to work at walmart and people bring em in there all the time not even reasonably secured etc. and I just had to go about my day!
Can a cop go into these establishments with a gun then, or are they above the law...
I’d say that all those signs are in direct violation of the 2nd Amendment…
A private business has rights as well, if you don’t like businesses anti gun rules don’t shop there. Pretty simple…
An estimated 250,000 civilian injuries are caused by law enforcement officers annually. More than 600 innocent people are killed by law enforcement in the U.S. each year.
Bull sh it.
This needs to be reversed in every day life.
Ignorance of the law is no excuse, unless you have qualified immunity. Then it's OK. DO anything you want to.
do not consent to searches & seizures. do not consent to field sobriety tests ever. do not answer questions. invoke your right to remain silent & right to an attorney if questioned.
There are quite a few lawyers that make videos similar to yours. Yours cover the best subjects, are clear, concise, and offer the best advice. Very well done.
A Conceal carry license is a permission slip you volunteered for to give up your right to keep and bear arms. Also, any law that says you can only carry in this place or time is a violation of the 2nd. Having to treat the police with kid gloves only for them to be able to beat, kill and violate your rights without any recourse shows we all live in Police States.
It does more than that. It informs the officer that you have passed a Criminal Background check and are not a criminal. They usually relax and stop fishing for suspension at that point.
@@sarge12212 No they don't, watch video after video after video they think we're all criminals period !! they escalate until they can effect an arrest
AmeroBabylon!!!
Here in KY you don't need a permit. If you can legally own a gun and over 21, you can carry concealed and you don't have to immediately inform an officer.
I don't need a permit in Florida either. But there are still good reasons to have one. Weapons like clubs, long knives and slungshots (not a typo) are legal to have with a permit. Still illegal without. @@hillbillytarzan
I don't answer questions, i don't consent to any searches nor seizures.
And “With all due respect, I would like to exercise my right to remain silent.”
Dumb that you have to verbally say it, but you do.
it's also good to not consent to be subject to and ruled by any authority
'slaaves' became 'serfs' became 'subjects' became 'citizens'
I am so glad that in Indiana the sign does not carry the force of law. All they can do is ask you to leave. If you don't they can call the cops on you for trespassing.
The thing is, asking someone "Do you have weapons" is a massive trick question because there is no way to answer it. If you say "yes" you've gone and done it, and if you say "no" they are "trained not to believe you." Do an episode on that dilemma Mr. Lawbertarian
"I don't answer questions"
@@trentvlak and how do you think that will work out an estate where you are required to give them that information?
It’s best to paint a picture of normality for them so they don’t think you’ve recently lost your mind and out there looking for trouble.
“Officer, I regularly carry protection and yes it’s on me right now. I’m not going to reach anywhere near it. I carry it in a holster on my right hip under my shirt.”
It’s a little better than “yes”. Then they know the what, where and why. Eliminate questions before they have to ask them. You’ve even given them the “when”. Always. I always have it. It’s not that I’m out here angrily carrying something just tonight.
@@deebee4575 we are "required" in my state but there's no penalty for not saying.
Doesnt matter what they believe
The advice ics appreciated. The laws are preposterous. According to Bruen, there was never a law prohibiting carrying in any condition.
Yes, at %:30 on "brandishing a firearm". The bit you quoted says " ..., or otherwise make the presence of a firearm known to another person to intimidate that person, regardless of whether the firearm is directly visible to that person". So simply telling someone that you have a gun, or having a "weapons on board" sign would suffice.
that is hor$hit ...just another ordinance not worth the paper it's written on........ 1773 JS
I was pulled over in mesa az for loud muffler, I was later arrested under ARS13-3102a1b for saying I don’t answer questions
What was the charge? And how much did you get for suing them for violating your rights under color of law?
@ the ARS I put up was the charge and I haven’t had court yet
Thank you for the info and websites. I have had my CCW permit for years and I see how easy it is to make a mistake that can land you in trouble.
They need to take away these businesses ability to limit concealed carry on their premise. Shouldn't be considered private property if they're conducting public business. All that junk is infringement of the 2nd
Never tell the officer you are carrying.
What they do buy you off?? First off we have rights and second amendment right!! They need to fear us not us fearing them!
Business' that prohibit the carry of a weapon in their establishment are also subject to law suits for not providing enough protection/security is you are injured while not having your weapon. This means that the security needs to be equal or better to what I can provide myself. No mall cop will ever come close to that standard.
As a veteran that took his oath in 1981 and still train weekly ....I concur
What I got out of this was…..ALL my rights are the same anywhere in the USA without question…except the 2nd
Crazy isn’t it. Like imagine if North Carolina was like you need to apply for a permit to exercise your first amendment right of free speech.
Yeah, here's the deal. There is no such thing as a privately owned central bank in a functioning republic.
The USA has been a lawless kakistocracy since 1913.
AmeroBabylon!
On the brandishing issue, when we lived in Seattle, I exited I-5 and pulled into a gas station. When I pulled up to the pump, a car drove up and stopped immediately behind us. It was only me and my infant daughter in her car seat.
A guy, red-faced and yelling got out of the other vehicle with a pistol in his hand. He brought the pistol up, and holding it in two hands, he started screaming about me cutting him off.
Had I cut him off? I don't know. I hadn't seen him or his vehicle in my life. But even if I had, it wasn't intentional. Why would i risk my child's life, my life, and the lives of other people on the interstate? What was definitely intentional was that he was pointing a pistol at me and the car that my child was sleeping in.
He could've yelled at me. He could've cursed me. He could've taken down my license plate and reported it to the police. Instead, what was his go to? To threaten my life.
My experience with firearms began at FT Benning, and what was one of the first things that the drill sergeants taught us? "Do not point your weapon at anyone that you don't want to kill." Was that his intention?
I explained to him that I hadn't seen his car, and some other people at the pumps said that the police were on their way. He got back into his car, called me an asshole, and drove off.
Almost twenty years later, I'm still angry at that cowardly punk.
Thank you for your service sir ... I live in Columbus now was stationed here in 1984 ....Glad he didn't pull the trigger ...God Bless
Thank you for your service. But did no one at thegas station, including yourself, not get his LPN and report him ?
@@pilgrimwings1295 I enjoyed my time in service, and no, I didn't think about getting his number. I was worried about the baby. I'm grateful for the other people at the pumps. Their bluff scared him off.
@@tangotango256 Thank you for your service as well. I went through infantry OSUT at Harmony Church the summer of 1979. I was never stationed there, but I was stationed at FT Stewart years later.
All that sounds really good. I have a question for you: When our second amendment apply and obey the law of the land protected for the people by the people? Since when codes and statuses take superiority over the Constitution of the United States of America? The truth is corporate policy are not law and if they presumed to be law they are colorable law and never been ratified. These advices are nothing but compliance to foreign officers paid by the county to violate our rights. No one have the authorityto rule over another man if he or she is not his property or his slave. Under the law of the land, we all are equal and ones would have more rights or power over another.
AmeroBabylon!
How does a person reconcile his/her second, fourth and fifth amendment rights in a shall notify state such as North Carolina?
In NC if you have a concealed carry license, you have a duty to notify. It’s a bit hard to navigate imo. I have a 5th to remain silent and not speak or answer any questions but am I in violation of my CCW if I evoke the 5th from the go? Do I suspend my 5th solely by possessing a ccw? I personally don’t like the idea of notifying because of how it immediately becomes exponentially more dangerous and tense the moment a weapon is mentioned in even the most casual and friendly encounters. I do however worry if I’m actually breaking the law or just in violation of my ccw and how it works with my civil rights.
It's a great legal question that demands clarification.
If one's First Amendment to conscious objections is inalienable; then why, and for what reason, is the Second Amendment claimed by Gov to not be inalienable?
Second amendment is your carry permit!
You should NEVER HAVE TO REACH FOR ANYTHING IN YOUR CAR! ALWAYS keep your insurance, registration and driver license strapped to your drivers side visor. When pulled over, be certain to keep your hands on the wheel, eyes front. When the oinker asks for your info, simply reach up and take it from the visor and hand it over and put your hands back on the steering wheel.
In my state, there is no need to tell the oinker I am carrying a gun. I will refuse to answer even if he asks.
ALWAYS KEEP YOUR MOUTH SHUT AND INVOKE YOUR FIFTH AMENDMENT RIGHT TO REMAIN SILENT.
NEVER CONSENT TO A SEARCH OF ANYTHING.
PUT THAT OINKER IN HIS PLACE AND KEEP HIM THERE!
Keep it in your phone
Your response tells all you just hate the police. In all my stops but one I received the ticket I deserved and it was a professional attitude and a friendly one.
Didn't post again
@@JerryRedd-bs8xi the police are not your friend and every interaction has a chance to escalate and get you injured or killed.
We don't have a right to defend ourselves. If we did, there woud be few prohibited areas. In some cities, the entire city is one huge prohibited area, partly because of school zones.
We do have the right. Dont comply with rules and laws that violate them. Ot is you duty to exercise them and defend them
"All laws repugnant to the constitution are null and void."- SCOTUS, Marbury v Madison 1803
FTP 💯
How about SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED. That’s what that pesky constitution thingy says anyway.
More times then not they demand you exit your vehicle without telling you a reason why other then saying they are telling you to do it
*Kinda funny (not really) that if you’re carrying in a state where “Open Carry” is legal so you don’t have a concealed permit, and your firearm is partially covered you can be charged with carrying a concealed weapon, at the same time if the exact same thing is true, except that you do have a concealed permit but ”Open Carry” is not legal, that partially covered firearm is not being concealed, it is being carried openly*
Keep it conceal 100% of the time and you never have an issue
I've noticed over the year's some of these signs on the inside and only visible as you exit
Abolish qualified immunity
No business under the law of public accommodation has the right to tell me I lose my RIGHTS by entering their premises that serves and depends on the public for revenue.
Honest people fallow the laws.
Crooks do not.
Honest people don't need laws.
Laws are created for criminals & idiots, to deter both from harming others.
Here is the Thing,...... CRIMINALS Do Not obey the Laws if the Deadly encounter with a Serial killer..... We are Doomed 👎❌👎
Why yes I have arms what do you tink I was driving with.
There shouldn't be prohibited places for our rights.
I just got charged with an aggravated dui & I told the officer I had a loaded handgun. I handed it to her & she put it in the back seat after the stop. No charges on the gun.
Aggravated dui= pissed and drunk? Lol. You got lucky
You aren't required anywhere to let them know. Because we have the right to remain silent no matter what the state and city laws are.
Signs mean nothing in oklahoma unless the type of location is prohibited by law (govt building, certain arena, bar)
5:20 I haven't done that since 91😂😂
By your definition of "brandishing," if you were to reach for something on an upper shelf at a store and your canceled pistol, PRINTED, some Karen could report you saying that she felt threatened by the presence of your pistol. Or as you reached into your pocket to get your money, she saw your spare magazine and wanted to be a bitch, she again could report that she felt threatened. Even if you honored that sign at the door and left your gun in a lockbox in the trunk of your car.
Yes. One man in Virginia some 45 or so years ago put his hand in his empty pocket and told the person he was talking to that he, the man with the hand in the pocket, had a gun. He didn't but was arrested, charged, tried, and sent to jail over it. It was classified as brandishing. When a cop comes up to you and puts his hand on his gun, that is brandishing, a crime if a consensual conversation is going on. The laws were written by socialist progressives and enforced by socialist progressives, in most cases. We know them as Democrars, in my opinion. Welcome to America! And, Merry Christmas!
Brandishing has two components, showing and intent
@davefletch3063 you may be right. Is the same in all the states and the District of Columbia?
@@DavidBenner-cy4zl unfortunately its not the same in all states, and DC of course is the pit of tyranny itself
this is america..2a SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED....
Make yourself a defendant and let us know how it goes on your case.
That’s funny.
As per Corpus Jurus Secundum. If the clients situation conflicts with the court, the lawyers loyalty is to the court first.
Cop walks up, ask you if your Armed, no I was driving with my feet!
What do you need glasses, are you even sure you pulled over the right car?
Man...... You Sir are a Great Lawyer, I Wish I live in TEXAS 😁😊
If they’re so spooked why are they cops?
Everyone who can afford it, and even those who can’t, should have a lawyer at their fingertips and with technology and apps like attorney shield and lawyers on retainer, having a lawyer at your fingertips to interact with the police for you is CLUTCH
That depends where you are. Here in Arkansas you're only legally required to tell officers you're carrying if you have a CHCL (we also have constitutional carry). If you have no CHCL your only answer should be "I don't answer questions." Consult with a local lawyer about anything before trying it
Better off just getting the CCP. I lived in Arkansas for 40 years and the cops never gave me any issues while carrying, as long as I handed the CCL over with my DL. As I've also pointed out, it additionally helps to cover the carrying of non-firearm weapons.
@sarge12212 yeah, no. I don't beg for permission from the state to carry 🤷♂️
I have a question. If I am on private property or a business like Walmart and something happens that put my life in danger and I could not defend myself because of the posted sign saying I couldn’t carry even though I have a license to carry does that make them liable and can I sue them for putting me in danger? In my opinion their actions caused me to rely on them for safety.
I have never seen a 51% sign, and have often wondered how a citizen is supposed to know that an establishment makes more than 50% of its income from the sale of alcoholic beverages.
It makes sense that a sign should be required before a firearms carrier could be charged.
Maybe I just don’t actually visit such establishments?
What is legality of a cop walking up to a parked car, an occupant inside, with the cop's weapon already drawn?
My answer to if I know why i was pulled over is, "No. I'm guessing that maybe a taillight has gone out on me?" Ball is now in their court to explain why they pulled me over. Not a confession nor an admission of my knowledge of any situation.
That's a great response. 😎👌
QUESTION: If I have a cased unloaded firearm in the trunk of my car, does this affect my duty to disclose? Is there a way to keep the police out of my trunk for a search if I have to disclose?
Post Office is a sneaker. Easy to forget to leave your firearm in your vehicle.
There used to be a saying my dad said when talking about traffic laws. I think it applies to dealing with police as well. "Here lies John, dead as a nail. John was in the right. Here lies John."
Mine had a better one
Here lies the body of Michael O’ Day. He died maintaining his right of way. His way was right & his will was strong but he’s just as dead as if he’d been wrong.
That is a lot of infringement on a Constitutional right that states exactly the opposite.
Common sense tells you not to drink and carry.
And yet some drunks will do it anyway!
You sir, are one DAMN FINE attorney. When you said "the odor of an alcoholic beverage" in the beginning... only cops and ESQ's know that. Speaking from years of professional experience in these areas.
Even if you’re required to notify the police that you’re carrying a firearm in a state that requires you to do so, the requirement to notify does not trump the 5th amendment against self incrimination. You can simply say you don’t wish to answer any questions and actively invoke your right to remain silent. Later in court after being charged with failure to notify you can make the argument that you were unsure of your exact location and therefore did not wish to incriminate yourself by violating a state statute if you were in possession of a firearm in a prohibited location. For instance it’s illegal to drive with a firearm in Florida within 1000 of a school zone. If you are unsure of how far away you are from a school zone and pulled over for a traffic stop, you can reasonably invoke your right to remain silent regardless of a state’s law requiring you to notify the officer you have a firearm.
Don’t think that’s true. Duty to inform means the cop doesn’t have to ask, but you still have to inform him anyway. This is bad advice, folks.
@@Johnfisher12345 It is always a reasonable defense to remain silent, even in duty to inform states, when you risk self-incrimination.
It's certainly a gray area, but I'm sure a lawyer would prefer you to shut up and say nothing over informing, finding out your are actually in an area you can't carry, and now you have a felony charge.
If you say nothing, the cop doesn't know if you are carrying or not and they can't search you unless certain things apply - don't give them legal reason to search and it doesn't matter if you are carrying illegal or not.
@@Johnfisher12345 your duty to inform never trumps a constitutional right against self incrimination. If it did the fifth amendment would be meaningless.
So, in Florida, law enforcement can not ask about a firearm. But, I’ve always thought if I was pulled over I would inform them that I am carrying. Should I not inform them? If they pull me, they would already know that I have a carry license. What should a person do? My thinking is that it would be thoughtful of me to inform them that I am carrying.
@@davidclaycomb5496 Don't tell them. I'm in GA . No duty to inform either. Hand documents. ( DL, insurance, registration) Invoke your 5th and shut up. If they ask you to exit who gives a sht ! Lock your doors and fst are voluntary there should be no legal RAS or PC bc you're not drinking and right ? If you are QUIT DRINKING AND DRIVING ! It's all really pretty simple if you don't let them intimidate you.
Walmart signs say "PLEASE REFRAIN FROM OPEN CARRY." What does that mean?
What it says. If you carry there, conceal carry.
If you open carry, they can trespass you.
Its all designed to run us through the wringer.
Disclosure varies from state to state. Some states require you to immediately tell the officer at a traffic stop that you are armed. Others only require to answer truthfully if the officer asks. Personally, I keep my drivers license and carry permit together and I disclose immediately and say it’s on my right hip. It puts the officer at ease and he is usually grateful for your candor.
until you get a Tyrant
@
I live in a south eastern Red State town with deputies that are happy to be working in a safe , crime free town. Traffic citations, fender benders and occasional drunks. Sort of like Mayberry. The deputies are mostly pleasant.
I have watched several interactions where both the permit and informing the officer of the firearm immediately escalates to near death. experience
Shall not be Infringed
Not being able to drive through a school zone with a loaded firearm is a complete violation of the 2nd Amendment, IMO.
In VT each time I was asked if I have a firearm on me I said yes.
Pending wha situation you are in if you are at right vs other guilty party they don't care.
Just asked for their safety.
Also, we had a private business here that had a sign. No guns allowed, then they took the sign down means either the owner started carrying realizing that something might happen or he possibly might have gotten sued.Regardless the sign is gone.
Only pulled over once in last 10 years in Northern VT. Officer asked if I had a firearm in the vehicle. Asked him which State he came from, because any native VT cop would ask 'How many firearms are in your vehicle?'
They put their safety over yours