Unlike the ideological rigidity of the original Cold War, today’s rivalry is shaped by interconnected economies, global tech races (like AI and quantum computing), and competition over influence in international institutions. However, labeling this as a 'Cold War' might oversimplify a complex global landscape where cooperation on issues like climate change and pandemics remains essential. The question is whether the world can navigate these tensions without repeating the divisiveness of the past.
The biggest communication problem is we don't listen to understand but we listen to reply. گەورەترین کێشە لە کاتی گفتوگۆی نێوانماندا ئەوەیە کە ئێمە بۆ ئەوە گوێ ئەگرین وەڵامی یەکتر بدەینەوە نەک لەیەکتر تێبگەین.
Great discussion overall, but I disagree with framing AI development as a potential form of "digital colonialism" - this perspective misses the fundamental nature of AI as an enabling technology. AI tools and capabilities are increasingly accessible to everyone, from students to entrepreneurs to businesses of any size, anywhere in the world. While there are valid concerns about technological gaps and access to resources, the focus should be on how AI democratizes opportunities and allows anyone to innovate and compete globally. Instead of viewing it through a lens of dominance/dependency, we should emphasize how countries and individuals can leverage AI to create value and solve problems. The real conversation should be about education, practical applications, and maximizing AI benefits for everyone.
Unlike the ideological rigidity of the original Cold War, today’s rivalry is shaped by interconnected economies, global tech races (like AI and quantum computing), and competition over influence in international institutions. However, labeling this as a 'Cold War' might oversimplify a complex global landscape where cooperation on issues like climate change and pandemics remains essential. The question is whether the world can navigate these tensions without repeating the divisiveness of the past.
Thanks to Sir Gita wirjawan for the content great discusss.increase my knowledge
Interesting and thought provoking.
I appreciate so many topics explored: 4Cs, EU past and future, US-China, AI, and open source. Thanks Gita and Olaf
Fantastic Enough to know reality movement in anything reality
Thanks to Gita wirjawan for discuss this topics its really important for me❤
His face was so radiant
Makasih pak
The biggest communication problem is we don't listen to understand but we listen to reply.
گەورەترین کێشە لە کاتی گفتوگۆی نێوانماندا ئەوەیە کە ئێمە بۆ ئەوە گوێ ئەگرین وەڵامی یەکتر بدەینەوە نەک لەیەکتر تێبگەین.
we are entering a new age, and nobody know what is in store for us. Will it be a violent one or a prosper one, God help us.
good
Next with Dr.Shashi Tharoor from India.
Great discussion overall, but I disagree with framing AI development as a potential form of "digital colonialism" - this perspective misses the fundamental nature of AI as an enabling technology. AI tools and capabilities are increasingly accessible to everyone, from students to entrepreneurs to businesses of any size, anywhere in the world. While there are valid concerns about technological gaps and access to resources, the focus should be on how AI democratizes opportunities and allows anyone to innovate and compete globally. Instead of viewing it through a lens of dominance/dependency, we should emphasize how countries and individuals can leverage AI to create value and solve problems. The real conversation should be about education, practical applications, and maximizing AI benefits for everyone.
Ga paham bahasa Inggris😂
fist
...argument where you need it...🕊🕊❤❤👏👏👏👏🙏🙏🪻