His name is Hutchison, as you write in the description, not Hutchinson - I used to make the same mistake sometimes. Anyhow, I have met him and the first thing I asked was about the comically fake videos - he did not bat an eyelid, he just straight away, "sometimes a TV crew wanted to see something and pressed to come over in a few days, I said it would take weeks to get things working, but they wanted to come over in days, so, I put on a show" That being said, I have had some samples from him analysed and in damaged areas, there are non-natural isotopes. I have respected you Robert for many years, but I don't want you to be on the wrong side of history on this. I derived a fractal toroidal structure, in part, from studying his samples, that explained the x-rays of "plasmoid" strike marks in Bostick and Nardi's 1980 paper (they had been researching for the US DOE since 1948 for ways to make fusion). When I showed my findings to a group of senior russian researchers on 31 April 2022, one, without comment, pointed me to a 1995 paper by Zhvirblis in "Chemistry of Life" referring to classified Soviet era energetics research - what they were researching was an exact technological equivalent in the form of a coil of coil of coil - of the structure I had derived, from Hutchison sample. Then, I saw that the Zhvirblis paper referred to a 1993 paper in the Russian peer reviewed journal "Electricity" by Nevessky a senior physicist and mathemetician at the Russian Academy of Science, he was tasked by Zhvirblis to see what, if anything, making a coil of the type he saw in 1988, would mean. Turns out it would mean, from generalised Maxwell equations, that the Poynting vector would be closed in a loop - this would explain the observance in 1980s of an electromagnetic phantom that would persist for up to two days - something that has been seen since by Urutskoyev in 57Fe in early 2000s exploding Ti foil experiments and in the peer reviewed 2019 paper by Bogdanovich et. al. This also explained observations in other systems we had evaluated or in the field of Condensed Matter Nuclear Science. On the 10th May 2022, a person following my investigations, sent me a paper from 2009 by a SLAC researcher called David Fryberger, in this 2009 paper, funded by the US DOE, he built on his previous DOE funded explanation of ball lightning from 1994, by realising that there must be possible, from generalised Maxwell equations, the ability to create "vacuum currents in the dirac sea" that are NOT dependant on ordinary matter. This supports the earlier work of the Soviet Energetics program, Zhvirblis/Nevessky and indeed, his papers explain many of the anomalous properties that Kenneth Radford Shoulders ascribed to, what he ultimately called, "Exotic Vacuum Objects" - which Ken said Ball Lightning are. Ken, who is the father of micro-electronics and inventor of the Quadrupole Mass Spectrometer, spent 33 investigating Hutchison Effect. In the 2009 paper, Fryberger states that the if the right level of clustering, energy and frequency is achieved in the clusters that are functionally equivalent to Ball Lightning, then the dyality angle of them is such that it disrupts ordinary matter nucleons reference with the local dirac sea, leading to the decay of nucleons. This is Coherent Matter Reactions. We have imaged the toroids of toroids. We have produced in a range of systems the crenelated Fe + O microspheres also found in natural Ball Lightning impact. We have also videoed the process of Ball Lightning reaching coherence and consuming W, Ti, Ni and Cu. It does the consumption on the inner boundary layer and we have shared 8k SEM images of the interaction cut zone between Ball Lightning and a copper pipe, a 10 yen coin, a Steel Hutchison sample from 1986 and another steel Hutchison sample from 2007. They all shoe a regular 'scalloping' in the affected area and material disappearance. Moreover, on our Ball Lightning cut Cu pipe, we see an orthogonal circular mesh of disrupted material in this fresh cut. It appears as if a mesh of toroidal structures have made the material disappear, this is consistent with John Hutchison, Ken Shoulders, Dr. Takaaki Matsumoto, David Hudson, Tadahiko Mizuno, Stanislav Adamenko, SAFIRE project and our own research. Fryberger offers one explanation, the Dyality process decays matter into light and leptons. We have observed both light and lepton emission in our research, strong light at below the blackbody temperature required to generate it and it is clear that John observed light emission from things that were not hot also. I would like to offer a public zoom debate with you on John Hutchison's work and the immense international, multi-decade research that was, in part, spawned from it now that we are getting to a good understanding, both from a physical experimental and mathematical/electro-dynamic and physics principles point of view, how he made the samples we physically have possession of.
I'm kind of amazed you zeroed in on this Bob. EVO-Dar! Yes, Robert seems a fair-minded fellow, but seriously deficient in fact-based evidence re: LENR. Peace Cheers Onward.
Bob, pay no attention to the man behind the curtain! While John Hutchison has done interesting work in the past, this does in fact appear to be quite an accurate replication of the Hutchison video segment cited. Spotting the string motion in the upper left corner was a good bit of observational work. You have to admit that levitating the toy UFO was a good bit of theater. So, analyzing and replicating the weird bendy metal is still of interest but the Hutch has no credibility going forward. Sure, it was faster and easier to fake a demo for TV instead of setting up a real experiment but there is no excuse for that.
@@NorseValhalla Not all videos attributed to John were made by him, many shows he took part in had a lot of material that had nothing to do with him and there have been a number of videos that have been claimed as his but were not. Is this one of them. The one that interests me is the canon ball and the spanner. The most interesting are the jellyfication ones, particularly were you have things merging into other things and doing so as if they have lost mass. It is the TONE of this video that grates. It almost looks as staged as the claims of staging it rails against.
I met John Hutchinson on the day he moved out from the place where he filmed his videos. I lived in the neighborhood and happened to be walking past his place while some of his equipment was being loaded onto a truck. I stopped to shake his hand and find out what was happening. I didn't ask any science questions, just noted that he was moving, and he had apparently been hired by a university science team to do his research and provided a warehouse to work out his experiments from instead of his one bedroom apartment in the city. He may not have known entirely what he was doing, but the effects he caused the neighborhood were renowned. I only heard from the daughter of the owner of the neighboring apartment about tenants stories; doors moving unnaturally, water and electricity misbehaving and even energy vibrations on their skin. I haven't heard from him since that time, about 2010, but I hope he is doing well.
Strange how these geniuses are often reclusive and regarded with suspicion in our towns and cities. Lucky you to have met the gentlemen. I have some theoretical and fantastical ideas myself which would probably be laughed out of the court of the theoretical physicist. A few years ago I acquired a compact disc which had a story concerning Harrison's chronometer and someone who was locked up in Bedlam and had covered the wall of their cell with written calculations for a workable chronometer. They say there is a fine line between genius and madness.
Hello, do you know if he is still alive and if he wrote any books on his experiments ? I’m trying to find out how I can replicate these experiments too. I’m very interested in sound and vibration.
I have filmed one of John’s experiments personally in 2008 in Vancouver Canada I can see how most public as well as engineering minds struggle with accepting something that has not been even fully understood by John himself there are few who will never need a proof and those who even if presented with real evidence will continue to doubt
John certainly would understand the equipment he's using, the schematic, and the setup. There was a rumor he created scalar waves. John should be able to at least explain this with a diagram or schematic and John should be motivated to get others to reproduce his experiment -- UNLESS it is too dangerous. You don't want your kitten, for example, to run into the scalar wave field while it's on. You also don't want some immature little kid messing around with this stuff if it is at all dangerous. Putting this on youtube might be equivalent to posting the schematics of an atom bomb.
perfectly written, I am fully in the same opinion, thank you Tom. The question one can ask is, if I would choose to hide information by using youtube, and I can not prevent other posting, how would I do it?
@@morpher44 - The way academic work is generally done is by publishing your experiments and their results in peer-reviewed journals. Was there a reason Hutchison couldn't do that?
Of all the Hutchison Effect videos of things melting and moving and floating over the years, for some reason I have never seen this one with the obvious string. Also odd, is that Hutchinson can see too and would have also seen the obvious string. Something funny going on here. Was the string video made after the raids on his lab?
That's not Hutchison"s garage where the original footage was shot, nor was that specific clip used in the original news story, though a similar one was. I know, I've seen it. This isnt the.only tech being held back from public access. If Tesla's research had been fully known, we would have free global wireless energy, flying cars, force fields that protect from cosmic rays and weaponry alike, and more. We are in the space age, and our space tech is being held back by the powers that be for some twisted reason. Sounds like we are being penned up when we should be spreading life through the solar system and beyond.
@@Ben111778 I hear ya. It is a shame that we ,as a civilization, just can't have only the good. Tesla was a bit sheltered from the inescapable evils of the world , as he began to show the us great things. He soon found a very cruel world surrounded him . It looks like he realized all he had done and all the good things he discovered for a better life for all, would surely be equally used to harm the world he truly wanted to better. I think he then blamed himself for what could come. His life story and how he was beaten down to nothing, just for caring about the future of humanity more than the profits of influential, is tragic. To me, his discovery of a sure and equal bad ,for good world, was in itself , a great discovery the world should have seen and changed. But of course, even that is hidden from us, as much as possible.
That's because when the cia raided his place and took all of his equipment, they made this film and released it as a debunking tool. Tried to make him look a charlatan. I have seen his original films with things like spanners tumbling aimlessly in the air with no static middle point at which a bit of cotton could be attached. Like all debunking videos this one leaves a lot to be desired
Historic texts on Tibetan Buddhists recounts how they levitate huge stones with group synchronized drumming techniques, which they did for days and boulders would be placed on high cliff plateau areas.
@@lilliansongs-w2dThe rhythm of the drums synchronised the workers possibly. Most religions had supernatural events long ago when the average person could not read or write
Thanks for the interest. The boulders were said to be part of cliffside temples built also as a way to avoid ground invasions and looting. @@davepowell7168
@@craigboden9455 You can smelt things like dissimilar metals together like that. Like, if you poured molten alum over a knife, and had the pour right, you could do the same The knife will have a much higher melting point than the alum in that case. You'd be left with what that pic showed. Been welding for 14 years. Seen all sorts of things like that. One similar would be sticking a tungsten electrode into the weld puddle. When cut, and or xrayed, you see a very clean tungsten electrode. Often still needle sharp, buried in the metal
@@Heliarc91 - you can also smash them together in a hydraulic press. Nothing spooky or unknown about anything that goober does. Hutchison I'm referring to.
@@Heliarc91 - you can also smash them together in a hydraulic press. Nothing spooky or unknown about anything that goober does. Hutchison I'm referring to.
Let us face it, if assuming this experiment managed to lift the ball up without any strings, it would still not classify as anti-gravity machine because it requires an external source of energy and a ball can be made to float in a field, for example a magnetic field, but ultimately the weight is being born by the magnetic field and its source which is resting on ground and not floating itself in air or in space.
No string will go slack while the weight of the object is still suspended. The top left hand corner shows a string or wire going slack while the object was suspended, stationary or going up. It consistently works inversely to what it should be doing if it were used to pull the object aloft. The string/wire should never go slack while the object is suspended, it would always be taut by the weight of the object. Yet the wire is often in a slack state. Having worked on high voltage devices it is normal for conductors to move around as you change the voltage or load levels. As the object is in a state of change the wire is also in a state of change. That's all this shows. Love Robert's videos and Hutchinson may have faked it, but the "evidence" in this is wrong. You just demonstrated that you can't observe two things at once or draw a proper correlation between them. Cheers!
I used to play around with subwoofers in my cars.. and it's quite obvious the power of sound. And how it tends to move things, anything and everything.
I agree, people are always complaining about a lack of physical evidence. Jon hutch has many bizarre samples. Mfmp has investigated with scanning electronic microscopes and found anomalies that prompted an entire theory that coincides with scientists like Jon archibald wheeler, Ken shoulders, bostic, and more.
@@ThinkingandTinkering Now a days he could use gallium passed off as steal, if didn't already. I've not really heard of the Hutchison Effect in maybe the last 15 years. It was very popular with Sept 11, of course.
I am soon going to do a 'tricks revealed'/'magic revealed' bunch of videos. Maybe starting in the new Financial Year... so maybe I'll get me some Gallium and do just that. I'll also 'pick on' Criss Angel'.
These are Hutchison's own words, to a reporter... Q: "So, how does it work?" A: "By carefully manipulating the fluctuations in the quantum state of cosmic scalar energy to be in resonance with the zero-point energy vacuum through the use of concentrated gamma ray frequencies > 10^42 GeV. The real trick is getting the ferromagnetic crystal converter to enact a space charge via the insulated hyper-force barrier semiconductor. Then it's just a matter of applying the correct inverse proportional harmonic signatures to the atomic structure using a delta cascading reagent. This serves as a catalyst for the trans-dimensional proto-duotronic ionizing quasi-muons so they may have the desired effect of isolating the specific stellar-inertial sigma-waves of the spacial impulse distortion hyperbole. Once applied you should notice an instant change in the ultra diametric molecular composition of everyday household materials such as lanthanum and yttrium. If no effect is witnessed then you may need to increase the thermo-polarity oscillator index to the cubic nucleo-synthetic tetrahedron. For safety reasons, I recommend having an asymmetrical neural auxiliary apparatus on standby should the kinetic angular cosmic polymer induce a negative charge on the omega astral-nominal manifold sequencer." Yeah. By the way, 10^42 GeV (of course NOT a measure of frequency) is about the energy of I forget how many Tzar Bombe.
The "string" in the left hand corner was possibly a wire with high current running through it causing it to move. If it was a "string" like this man suggested then why does it get slack as the object floats and get tight when it sits back down? That is opposite of what it should do. Watch the string again, as the object moves the string moves in ways totally inconsistent with what it should be doing.
Should have kept watching, sucker! No string will go slack while the weight of the object is still suspended. The top left hand corner shows a string or wire going slack while the object was suspended, stationary or going up. It consistently works inversely to what it should be doing if it were used to pull the object aloft, but very consistent if it was an electrical conductor responding to a high voltage field. The string/wire should never go slack while the object is suspended, it would always be taut by the weight of the object. Yet the wire is often in a slack state. Having worked on high voltage devices it is normal for conductors to move around as you change the voltage or load levels. As the object is in a state of change the wire is also in a state of change. That's all this shows. It proves the presence of a high voltage field. Robert just demonstrated that he, or you, can't observe two things at once or draw a proper correlation between them. Cheers!
@@1nvertedReality Irony -the expression of one's meaning by using language that normally signifies the opposite, typically for humorous or emphatic effect. Sucker.
Question? since you have obviously brought our attention to the string. Can someone explain to me why the string goes slack as the object ascends and tensions when the object descends? Is it possible the string served as a pole for the object to keep a linear orientation?
Have you looked into the Townsend Brown Effect? Asymmetrical Capacitors charged to over 20K Volts will levitate. See: "Asymmetrical Capacitor Lifters" Some say Ion Propulsion, while others disagree. What do you think?
ionic lifters work, although this is a delicate force. I think "Evil Genius Parts, Book 1 - Chapter 1 - Anti-Gravity Project" describes how to build one as I'm sure there are other books that describe this. It would be fun to mess around with and replicate.
Still may be, this video is bad science. No string will go slack while the weight of the object is still suspended. The top left hand corner shows a string or wire going slack while the object was suspended, stationary or going up. It consistently works inversely to what it should be doing if it were used to pull the object aloft, but very consistent if it was an electrical conductor responding to a high voltage field. The string/wire should never go slack while the object is suspended, it would always be taut by the weight of the object. Yet the wire is often in a slack state. Having worked on high voltage devices it is normal for conductors to move around as you change the voltage or load levels. As the object is in a state of change the wire is also in a state of change. That's all this shows. It proves the presence of a high voltage field. Robert just demonstrated that he can't observe two things at once or draw a proper correlation between them. Cheers!
"Only liars think the Truth hurts because it destroys their illusions and delusions...To those that seek it it is music to their ears." "Lie is at the centre of beLIEve because only the truth shall set you free whether you believe it or not." -- ancient clown
I have a schematic of the Effect, Thomas Bearden made a small image of the actual setup (that is not shown in the video) Bearden created the MEG Generator.
I used to watch Hutchinson videos back when TH-cam had NO ads. His videos sent me on a 10 year bender of making free energy devices and frequency generators. Thanks to Hutchinson and guys like you I have learned about magnetism, electronics, and even some coding. I finally concluded that Hutchinson was fake because he never once explains anything in his videos. Not even close. Free energy is also fake btw. Lovin your channel…. Your kind of videos are what made TH-cam.
Oh, well let me fill you in then. In his own words... Q: "So, how does it work?" A: "By carefully manipulating the fluctuations in the quantum state of cosmic scalar energy to be in resonance with the zero-point energy vacuum through the use of concentrated gamma ray frequencies > 10^42 GeV. The real trick is getting the ferromagnetic crystal converter to enact a space charge via the insulated hyper-force barrier semiconductor. Then it's just a matter of applying the correct inverse proportional harmonic signatures to the atomic structure using a delta cascading reagent. This serves as a catalyst for the trans-dimensional proto-duotronic ionizing quasi-muons so they may have the desired effect of isolating the specific stellar-inertial sigma-waves of the spacial impulse distortion hyperbole. Once applied you should notice an instant change in the ultra diametric molecular composition of everyday household materials such as lanthanum and yttrium. If no effect is witnessed then you may need to increase the thermo-polarity oscillator index to the cubic nucleo-synthetic tetrahedron. For safety reasons, I recommend having an asymmetrical neural auxiliary apparatus on standby should the kinetic angular cosmic polymer induce a negative charge on the omega astral-nominal manifold sequencer."
It’s John Hutchison himself! There were videos that were important as well as web pages with devices that you have invented on your website which is no longer up... Is there somewhere I can find them? There was a video that was also supposed to uploaded which was going to give the details of the voltages, frequencies, and devices involved with your famous John Hutchison effect, but I was never able to see it
No string will go slack while the weight of the object is still suspended. The top left hand corner shows a string or wire going slack while the object was suspended, stationary or going up. It consistently works inversely to what it should be doing if it were used to pull the object aloft. The string/wire should never go slack while the object is suspended, it would always be taut by the weight of the object. Yet the wire is often in a slack state. Having worked on high voltage devices it is normal for conductors to move around as you change the voltage or load levels. As the object is in a state of change the wire is also in a state of change. That's all this shows. Love Robert's videos and Hutchinson may have faked it, but the "evidence" in this is wrong. You just demonstrated that you can't observe two things at once or draw a proper correlation between them. Cheers!
There's a sci-fi short story about an engineer who discovers a very very weak antigravity effect and gets fired for trying to study it on his spare time in the lab... so he makes a little tin rocket and hangs it from a string to take to public fairs as a showman's toy and wows all the kids with it. He runs into an old associate of an associate who offers to buy the thing because it looks so real and he wants to use it to trick his friends. At some point he plays with it and discovers that the string alone isn't strong enough to lift the tin rocket... the device and the landing pad MUST be turned on.
Your first congratulations is on how the many fake video's on TH-cam are needing further explanation. The second is showing the second coil not being wired in anyway, therefore no resonance is possible. Thank you Rob, you're a very honourable man.
I didn't want people watching half the video and thinking it was real - a few Easter eggs were necessary I thought - just so folks would say hang on a sec!!!
@@ThinkingandTinkering anyone watching half your videos don't understand the essence of what you are about and the honour and integrity that is Robert Murray Smith
One of his pictures is of a penny embedded in stainless steel. You can duplicate this by using a Bismuth and indium alloy in place of the stainless steel. You can buy bars of this alloy that melt at the temperature of boiling water, and cast them into a plastic mold.
lol, I saw Hutchison Anti-Gravity Effect in the title and just had to watch. I did notice the thread before you started and thought to myself "Yep, he is going to reproduce it exactly as it was done!" Thanks for the top notch reproduction and the explanation. We need more like this.
The string/wire should have never gone slack while under load of the object. This video proves nothing other than you and Robert can't observe two things at once or draw a proper correlation.
it was floating within a medium of waves directed at it or surrounding it, passing by which were emitted from an antenna. Rather than something you see pushing or holding you up it's a vibrating wave of energy, everything is about resonance.
Reminds me of when Mylow was busted using a motor and fishing line to turn his Howard Johnson "Magnet motor" replication. The guys over on the Overunity site worked hard and finally proved this was how it was done. A lot of people wasted a lot of money and time trying to replicate Mylow's device.
Are you saying sound waves can't make something levitate? Can you link to his original video to verify the one shown here is really his? How do you think he made metal warp in such strange ways? Thanks
Clockwise, counter clockwise, bubble, pressure, resonance, changing the atmosphere around it, cancelation zone, second frequency. There's more to it than just a string. In a sense of most minds it's impossible. Having the government take away your equipment 3 times. There's more to it than a string.
Wait what? What gov't took what away? (no jokes here) I went deep down the rabbit hole and then hit this channel that wants me to pay for videos about making supercapacitors at home - this is the "logical" gate I needed to find. Need more data. What you got - what's further down the rabbit-hole? Cheers!
Hutchinson claims he had equipment confiscated, he also claimed that the military had used his equipment to "do 9/11". Other people claim Elvis is alive and well and living in the secret Nazi moonbase.
This intuitively makes sense to me. Science is about asking nature questions to learn it's patterns, not upholding oyr beliefs with emotional framework. I still keep an open mind, but extreme skepticism is a healthy trait in these matters I think. Appreciate your demo. 🍻
It makes sense that the object goes up as the wire goes slack? As long as the object is suspended the string/wire should never go slack. Agree about being skeptical but don't base your skepticism on this video.
@@1nvertedReality I don't and actually believe John has important things to teach. I have asked special effects people and magicians about the floating cannon ball or jellification of metal. They have all been stumped and can'tgivea good explanation. I also talked with John and he is a vary caring and brilliant guy. He will say straight up he doesn't follow the proper scientific methods, he just likes playing with stuff. 😅
@@officialdiadonacs From what vids I've seen he seems genuinely a good guy. Good to hear it from someone that has met him. Thanks Spending a lazy day off re-watching everything Hutchison.
For those who are disappointed that levitation due to the falsity of the Hutchison Effect, go now and look into "quantum locking". You just might restore your hope in levitation.
The top left hand corner shows a string or wire going slack while the object was stationary or going up. It consistently works inversely to what it should be doing if it were used to pull the object aloft. The string/wire should never go slack while the object is suspended, it would always be taut by the weight of the object. Yet the wire is often in a slack state. Having worked on high voltage devices it is normal for conductors to move around as you change the voltage or load levels. As the object is in a state of change the wire is also in a state of change. That's all this shows. Love Robert's videos and Hutchinson may have faked it, but this "evidence" in this is wrong. You just demonstrated that you can't observe two things at once or draw a proper correlation between them. Cheers!
@Robert Murray-Smith I think it's important to point out the string was slack while slowly descending. @just goes to show how powerful the medium of TV is. Pointing out that there is a string lifting the object paints a story that this was faked. While at the same time the string was slack as the object very slowly descended. If a video was made discussing a breakthrough on partial levitation explaining how a string was used to lift the object and you can see how once the object was lifted the string was released and the object slowly drifted to the ground you would be marveling over the advancements he is making towards levitation technology. @ Robert Murray Smith. I respect what you do and I enjoy what you bring to the community. You have both the credentials and the passion. Invention and discovery are about doing things that nobody has done before. If everybody only did what was known to work or be good enough we wouldn't have everything we do today. The light bulb was not made with understood science of the time. It was made with trial and error. John Hutchinson has a passion for bringing something to the table that no one else bothered with researching because they lived within the constraints of good enough. I think it's important to recognize John's passion for sustainable long-term energy solutions such as his solid state batteries that he's been working with. I think that if you're going to make a video about John Hutchinson's string you should have pointed out and observed for yourself that the string appears to be used to lift and the string appears to be slack while the object slowly descends. I'm disappointed that you made such a matter of fact video suggesting that it was faked. I would rather listen to you talk about the effectiveness or ineffectiveness of his solid state crystal batteries and listen to an educated analysis of the materials he was using.
If John was pulling on the wire(not string) it would get taught when the saucer went up and get lax when the saucer rested on the table, but this is opposite of what is observed. Besides, lets be honest, choosing one video out of many, to discredit John, is quite frankly Cherry Picking.
What a waste of time. Here I thought this might be serious. Nowhere near the equipment and knowledge of John. He may have been quirky, or autistic, but making fun isn't doing proper investigation. I don't care who you are. I wouldn't buy any of your material. Most of the comments I read here are like the kids wanting to agree with the school yard bully.
That was not John Hutchinson's original video with the string. It's propaganda to keep to public oblivious to advanced technologies that rewrite physics and expose the reality of the world in which we live.
The charlatan in your video reminds me of a experimenter that I was sent on an interview from a TV station, he had done several interviews with all sorts of places and no one had ever questioned what he was saying, when I showed up with the cameras and he pulled out drawers of resistors soldered end-to-end the next drawer would have capacitor soldered and to end the next drawer would have transistors soldered in series and he had lights flashing on the front panels of these drawers he pulled out, the trickery was exposed, this fellow even got grant money and equipment to search for extra terrestrials from his home. Needless to say I turned off the cameras put them back in their cases tore down the tripods and headed out.
I've always been a fan of Eric Laithwaite and his gyroscope endeavours. His Christmas lectures are on youtube and are great! Not that these are in any way antigravity, but maybe could be a path toward manipulating masses in new ways.
Look up Sandy Kidd's device. He got it to work after building it in his garage by himself over 20+ years. He linked up with Eric Laithwaite before Eric died. He used opposite gyroscopes to lift the mass of the machine.
the problem with debunking theory is, the wire goes in the wrong direction. if the object goes up that mean somebody pulls at the string but you see it hang down and. i cant see a direct connection from the movement of the object and movement of the string
Well done Rob, a great exposure. Videos like his have probably enticed many people to waste much time and money trying to replicate his experiments. There have been many others over the years with similar claims, I hope you continue to offer "alternative" explanations to their work also, it makes for an insightful and entertaining series. 😉
Martin-I have replicated some of Hutchinson's experiments with crystal batteries successfully. They produce voltage but unfortunately very little amperage, however they have very peculiar properties (increase output voltage when placed on a load).
For all the people saying "it's fake". I lived not far from this guy John Hutchison, heard the stories seen his George Knapp interview, when the government came to "shut his lab down due to safety concerns" it was in the news they did in fact "confiscate" his lab when he refused a contract to work with them. He later built a new one in the next town over and the same thing happend this time u.s military was interested too. Before the government came he managed to convince the German government to buy his equipment and fund a project to do with using the hutchison effect to clear pollution from oceans which he is still pursuing to this day.
I recall seeing some other experiments where he had bowling balls "levitating" in a box. I think the way he achieved this was to attach the camera to the box, then invert the box (and camera) in such a way it looked like the ball was "falling upwards".
I went to find Hutchison about 8 years ago. He drove into a Walgreens in his dark red Ford van, and walked inside dressed like a woman. What a damn freak. That was it for me.
He dislikes male aggressiveness and prefers portraying femininity, nothing illegal about that. And it keeps people like you away from him, doesn't it? Kind of smart if you ask me.
Only thing I saw was that the ball rose up in such a way that it was obviously suspended from a single point at it's top. Obviously a string. If it was real it wouldn't reorient itself as it left the ground. An object in a weightless state won't turn heavy side down. Common sense...
@@MrGoatflakes It seems obvious that you don't know much about gravity, or the word hypothesis. I mean for fucks sake, he showed you the string. How obtuse can you be? Have you never seen a video from the ISS, or the vomit comet? I don't suppose you would know what that is now would you? That's the Boeing 747 that the USA uses to train astronauts in 0-G... that means no gravity. Because if you had seen any of those, you'd know how stupid you really sound. Maybe you should do some research before you spout off next time.
You're going to piss a bunch of people off I happen to agree with you there are two types and if someone is lying they need to be exposed we just have to make sure to do our due diligence and not discredit people thank you for the video and hold on tight cuz this is going to be a bumpy one
My problem with your string theory is that its movements doesn't cohere with the object. The string is slack when the object moves up, when it should have been straight and tight. It should only be slack when the object is resting on the ground.
It does cohere. It proves the presence of high voltage field. As power goes up, object rises and the wire conductor is pulled towards the center of the field creating the slack effect. When the field is stable the wire goes straight again. It isn't slacking, it just a loose conductor being pulled toward the field every time the field strength is in a state of change. Judging from the amount the conductor deflected towards the field he's playing with some pretty high DC voltages.
Hahaha I knew this was a debunk firstly because it was obvious but most importantly the distinct lack of your maniacal laughter as you cast your scientific magic rob! 😉
I first noticed the way the toy swung in the air as a pendulum would, then how you cut to a close up with the background filling the frame vertically. Add a Tesla name-drop and season with some sciency words and voila! Nice setup.
"state sponsored"..... I think hutchinsonm charging people $100 to see shitty vhs copies of his faked videos tells us all we really need to know. Gullible sucker sponsoring is a much more reliable source of income for the alternative new age woo industry
hahah, i could tell from the movement that there was a fishing line on there, Hutchinson's items would move randomly and not have any particular balancing point.. llittle bit disappointed you faked it but good effort lol..
@@martinwragg8246 not at all, what I am saying is having watched multiple interviews and experiments the effect Hutchinson produced was far more random and uncontrolled, if you have seen the videos then you know what I mean 🙏. Nikola Tesla was reported to have achieved similar effects in his lab and the marks on the ceiling can still be seen to this day 🤔. Although Rob did a good job faking it, there is significant evidence that it is a real phenomena that is not understood with the current physics we have..
Wow! I never caught that in John's video before. I feel cheated by John as I always had some respect and admiration for his work. Glad you pointed this out! I've always been pretty sharp catching the B. S. but my own desire to see someone figure out some level of antigravity got my acceptance ahead of my questionable caution. Thanks for sharing your video.
I never caught this on Johns videos also, so I am wandering is this really a Johns video or fake replica of the real Johns video. Mister Robert could provide us the link to the original.
@@alequ83 I remember seeing this video back in the early 2000's. I can't remember seeing the string but it was pretty hard to see anything in those old quicktime and realmedia videos.
Well, after watching that, isnt everybody?! After all, that's exactly the effect they wanted to create with that fake video that was never in the original footage. I saw the original footage, and non of his experiments moved like that. Hutchison demonstrated how sound waves could not only create levitation, but break down the naturally occurring bonds in matter. That spiked the interest of the governments, promoted the raids, and he ended up moving to the US under an agreement to continue his experiments and share his findings with the US DOD. There are news reports south of the border.
As an amateur Foley artist, the first thing I noticed was that the buzzing sound you recorded sounded like it was close mic'd and thus too clear and loud and "up front" as compared to what you'd expect to be from a natural ambient effect. There was also a little bit of choppiness in volume im guessing from inconsistencies from splicing the audio in. That said, it is a great video, and adding the "incidental sound" does help "sell" the illusion.
I totally respect what you said about charlatans. They would do anything to keep humanity in the dark for their own monetary greed. Your channel is first class just like yourself Robert. God bless and peace to you Sir. Peace is what the world really needs that right now.
The pendulum effect gives the string away, as well as the turning upright of the toy as it rises. I never believed anything Hutchinson said , did, or put out. I remember him being on some documentary and the narrator calling him “Dr. Hutchinson”. Got a good laugh out of that one.
I haven’t even got to the bit where you’ve suspended it from a string yet and that you’re clearly just having a laugh, fair enough I guess it’s low hanging fruit and an easy video to make for views, but if you want to take it just a little more seriously- You’re missing something which is high potential electrostatic fields and radio frequency modulation these are the two missing components. Look, everyone knows that John faked a bunch of his videos, after he got way too much of the wrong kind of interest, this is part of the historical narrative of John Hutchinson, perhaps you missed that bit…? (maybe all of his antigravity videos can be dismissed fair enough, but that doesn’t solve the problem). Unfortunately for you and everyone else studying this stuff it doesn’t actually invalidate all of the effects that have been observed by John- Life is more complicated than black and white binary thinking, one needs to look into the entire situation and the context around it, John actually had the Navy and all kinds of other groups go out there and visit him repeatedly randomly showing up at his lab and even interfere with his ability to continue doing what he was doing. It’s not about beliefs, because belief have nothing to do with science, nor is it about being offended but the fact that you would mention those two things shows that you’re aware of them which is odd. No one concerned with Science should be concerned with those two issues causing offence is besides the point. Equally though in the interests of discovery one cannot simply take a position of pure scepticism, because that will have one dismissing phenomena that might otherwise be of interest- Even if something is completely fake entirely doesn’t mean that it couldn’t actually be done to believe so is fooling oneself. Now let’s see you replicate the collapsing twisting jellified piece of metal- The welding of incompatible materials in real time on video and all of the other weird stuff that he’s managed to do- of course the problem with John is that no one really knows how he did this and it’s entirely possible he’s not entirely sure himself. It would make sense that after John couldn’t reproduce the effect on demand, he might have ended up faking some videos having attracted interest, equally it’s possible that he might of made intentionally fake videos to send certain organisations in the opposite direction having attracted unwarranted attention- no one likes being spied on that kind of thing has a funny way of making people feel uncomfortable and regretting their choices. Life can be genuinely complicated- not everything is necessarily as it seems, even if it is as it seems 😂 Having written all that, great video I really enjoyed it and I do like your work, so please don’t take this the wrong way.:)
I don't take it the wrong way mate - I am in no way trying to rubbish anything - all I can say right now is John faked a few of his Anti-Gravity vids - that's it - I don't go from that to say everything is rubbish - I mean what do I know? not a lot tbh
You claim that blind hyper-skepticism is a bad thing and I agree. I think it is best to be very open-minded but that must be tempered with a healthy portion of skepticism. To be taken seriously and trusted by others one must have an impeccable history of honesty. Hutchinson violated that trust by faking some videos.
@@William_Hada Oh yes I wholeheartedly agree, I in no way wish to dunk upon scepticism here. Scepticism when properly applied, becomes absolutely vitally important with regard to the scientific method. It’s just that there are many forms of philosophical scepticism, actually academia itself is a form of ancient Greek philosophical scepticism. (and in my personal opinion perhaps not the best school, though I digress) Scepticism forms a vital tool and axis of analysis when used responsibly. Yes trust was violated however violating trust isn’t discreditation of scientific hypotheses. It certainly isn’t a good indicator but that might be actually even favourite for other reasons.
@@William_Hada The point about him faking some bits of video are well known. The explanation turns out to be more interesting than the actual faking. It is a logical inference that if someone is faking something that discredits anything else they may have done. Since the predicate and the conclusion are in fact logically disconnected or at least only connected by assumption, and since the association presents a very seldom question and implicit inference of discreditation, it’s quite easy to use that to one’s advantage. Quite why someone would need to do this might not make sense to anyone who haven’t found themselves in such a position.. - clearly VERY few people would ever find themselves in such a position, so it becomes quite hard to judge.. Anyway the other supposition and it is a supposition is that JH wished to get rid of some of the more ‘troublesome’ official interest that he had inadvertently attracted. To quote him: “ I knew I had something, I was just putting it out on what was at that time a new video platform, it (youtube) wasn’t like it is now, the video’s were originally anonymous, I didn’t expect much interest beyond other peoples opinions. I was looking for people who were doing similar experimentation and having similar results to communicate with. In the end people demanded more and more evidence, there was an enormous amount of pressure and that ended up getting in the way.” Yes, that may sound like something out of a science-fiction movie, so scepticism absolutely becomes necessary and a valid response. There is a tangible difference though between scepticism and cynicism. The intelligence community really are actual entities that do exist. Weapons development represents a financially enormous and highly secretive Industry with enormous amounts of money and power at their disposal. One can very easily establish from declassified documents, as completely irrational as it may seem, that all kinds of bizarre and borderline harassment and sometimes downright illegal activities are undertaken around individuals who develop something of interest. This is not hearsay, one can search the CIA‘s own database and find examples of this. People don’t ridicule the Havana syndrome events these day’s, but they used to before parts of the event’s were classified. In fact those who were suffering from the influences of whatever was going on, certainly had a lot of cynicism and disbelief. Such that subsequently it’s admitted that this tendency toward dismissiveness actually hindered and heavily delayed adequate scientist investigation and that should serve as a lesson moving forward. When it was finally investigated much of the evidence that could have been studied was no longer present. There are those that think the entire thing was a matter of mass psychosis, but that would not account for the physical evidence in the form of medical reports. The entire situation must be regarded therefore as a mystery with outcomes taking various different rational positions on the topic ranging from complete scepticism through two validating theories on non-ionising electromagnetic radiation and cross-frequency modulation on the autonomic and nervous system functions of the human organism. Even science-fiction writers have come under scrutiny on occasion as bizarre as irrational as that may sound. If you’re interested in this you could do worse than looking at the historical Marconi Deaths - One must stress though the whole topic has not really faced scientific scrutiny, there are many conspiracy focused spins on it, although the events though are factual, although even the most sceptical person would have to admit collating those events might be a mistake even though taken collectively they do certainly look awfully suspicious. Point being when one stumbles into such a spooky domain all kinds of strange things that are absolutely unusual can take place and having unusual reactions to them can actually be quite rational. Think of the number of celebrities who in trying to get rid of the attention of the tabloid press have only made things worse, believe it or not discrediting oneself can be enormously powerful if used correctly. Just because most people do not think of this or it seems unlikely doesn’t mean that is the case.
@@hominidaetheodosia He faked videos to get rid of a certain portion of his audience? That sounds completely rediculous to me. It sounds like the actions of a person out of touch with reality.
Excellent program. For the sake of our own sanity and for science, it pays to begin as a sceptic, though never as a debunker. Those who choose to merely debunk are negative by nature, and hold back progress as much as they can.
If only he would show the actual videos Hutchinson released. These are not them, I saw solid objects levitating and stretching, melting and merging. Saw ice cream levitating up out from it cone. Things that couldn't be faked.
The top left hand corner shows a string or wire going slack while the object was stationary or going up. It consistently works inversely to what it should be doing if it were used to pull the object aloft. The string/wire should never go slack while the object is suspended, it would always be taut by the weight of the object. Yet the wire is often in a slack state. Having worked on high voltage devices it is normal for conductors to move around as you change the voltage or load levels. As the object is in a state of change the wire is also in a state of change. That's all this shows. Love Robert's videos and Hutchinson may have faked it, but this "evidence" in this is wrong. You just demonstrated that you can't observe two things at once or draw a proper correlation between them. This video debunks nothing. Cheers!
How cute that you think you figured it out I've built a device that produces the effects on command I even talked to John about it the zone of incursion where both longitudinal emf waves produces this after the process of 4 wave mixing phase-conjugation occurs but also the anomalous balls of plasma in the zone
Thankyou so much! You help me to stop wasting my precious time of my way too short live. Keep it up. Mybe you could have a look at the videos on the youtube channel called daniel's inventions. That could serve lots of guys like me a lot. I believe in free energy, but I end up hesitating, when it comes to copying the posted experiments on TH-cam.
I came up with a few designs based on the particle physics facts I've discovered since 95, along with research into working tech. Deyo's lifter was impressive. I improved that design. The geometric interaction of rotating columns of charge is key. This can be used to accelerate the heavy end of the posited pole at a 3rd point where charge is forced to squeeze through in a forced decision. Splitting charge and folding zero point to generate free energy at once. That's the secret to portable super efficient antigrav.
Think again. No string will go slack while the weight of the object is still suspended. The top left hand corner shows a string or wire going slack while the object was suspended, stationary or going up. It consistently works inversely to what it should be doing if it were used to pull the object aloft. The string/wire should never go slack while the object is suspended, it would always be taut by the weight of the object. Yet the wire is often in a slack state. Having worked on high voltage devices it is normal for conductors to move around as you change the voltage or load levels. As the object is in a state of change the wire is also in a state of change. That's all this shows. It proves the presence of a high voltage field. Robert just demonstrated that he can't observe two things at once or draw a proper correlation between them. Cheers!
This was very much like those experiments in the 1960's with televisions and rockets. More or less everyone appeared to fall for them. Oh and a bit like the experiment over the last two years.. Best wishes.
His name is Hutchison, as you write in the description, not Hutchinson - I used to make the same mistake sometimes. Anyhow, I have met him and the first thing I asked was about the comically fake videos - he did not bat an eyelid, he just straight away, "sometimes a TV crew wanted to see something and pressed to come over in a few days, I said it would take weeks to get things working, but they wanted to come over in days, so, I put on a show"
That being said, I have had some samples from him analysed and in damaged areas, there are non-natural isotopes. I have respected you Robert for many years, but I don't want you to be on the wrong side of history on this.
I derived a fractal toroidal structure, in part, from studying his samples, that explained the x-rays of "plasmoid" strike marks in Bostick and Nardi's 1980 paper (they had been researching for the US DOE since 1948 for ways to make fusion). When I showed my findings to a group of senior russian researchers on 31 April 2022, one, without comment, pointed me to a 1995 paper by Zhvirblis in "Chemistry of Life" referring to classified Soviet era energetics research - what they were researching was an exact technological equivalent in the form of a coil of coil of coil - of the structure I had derived, from Hutchison sample. Then, I saw that the Zhvirblis paper referred to a 1993 paper in the Russian peer reviewed journal "Electricity" by Nevessky a senior physicist and mathemetician at the Russian Academy of Science, he was tasked by Zhvirblis to see what, if anything, making a coil of the type he saw in 1988, would mean.
Turns out it would mean, from generalised Maxwell equations, that the Poynting vector would be closed in a loop - this would explain the observance in 1980s of an electromagnetic phantom that would persist for up to two days - something that has been seen since by Urutskoyev in 57Fe in early 2000s exploding Ti foil experiments and in the peer reviewed 2019 paper by Bogdanovich et. al. This also explained observations in other systems we had evaluated or in the field of Condensed Matter Nuclear Science.
On the 10th May 2022, a person following my investigations, sent me a paper from 2009 by a SLAC researcher called David Fryberger, in this 2009 paper, funded by the US DOE, he built on his previous DOE funded explanation of ball lightning from 1994, by realising that there must be possible, from generalised Maxwell equations, the ability to create "vacuum currents in the dirac sea" that are NOT dependant on ordinary matter. This supports the earlier work of the Soviet Energetics program, Zhvirblis/Nevessky and indeed, his papers explain many of the anomalous properties that Kenneth Radford Shoulders ascribed to, what he ultimately called, "Exotic Vacuum Objects" - which Ken said Ball Lightning are. Ken, who is the father of micro-electronics and inventor of the Quadrupole Mass Spectrometer, spent 33 investigating Hutchison Effect.
In the 2009 paper, Fryberger states that the if the right level of clustering, energy and frequency is achieved in the clusters that are functionally equivalent to Ball Lightning, then the dyality angle of them is such that it disrupts ordinary matter nucleons reference with the local dirac sea, leading to the decay of nucleons. This is Coherent Matter Reactions.
We have imaged the toroids of toroids. We have produced in a range of systems the crenelated Fe + O microspheres also found in natural Ball Lightning impact. We have also videoed the process of Ball Lightning reaching coherence and consuming W, Ti, Ni and Cu. It does the consumption on the inner boundary layer and we have shared 8k SEM images of the interaction cut zone between Ball Lightning and a copper pipe, a 10 yen coin, a Steel Hutchison sample from 1986 and another steel Hutchison sample from 2007. They all shoe a regular 'scalloping' in the affected area and material disappearance.
Moreover, on our Ball Lightning cut Cu pipe, we see an orthogonal circular mesh of disrupted material in this fresh cut. It appears as if a mesh of toroidal structures have made the material disappear, this is consistent with John Hutchison, Ken Shoulders, Dr. Takaaki Matsumoto, David Hudson, Tadahiko Mizuno, Stanislav Adamenko, SAFIRE project and our own research. Fryberger offers one explanation, the Dyality process decays matter into light and leptons. We have observed both light and lepton emission in our research, strong light at below the blackbody temperature required to generate it and it is clear that John observed light emission from things that were not hot also.
I would like to offer a public zoom debate with you on John Hutchison's work and the immense international, multi-decade research that was, in part, spawned from it now that we are getting to a good understanding, both from a physical experimental and mathematical/electro-dynamic and physics principles point of view, how he made the samples we physically have possession of.
Robert would do well to read this reply.
I'm kind of amazed you zeroed in on this Bob. EVO-Dar! Yes, Robert seems a fair-minded fellow, but seriously deficient in fact-based evidence re: LENR. Peace Cheers Onward.
Bob, pay no attention to the man behind the curtain! While John Hutchison has done interesting work in the past, this does in fact appear to be quite an accurate replication of the Hutchison video segment cited. Spotting the string motion in the upper left corner was a good bit of observational work. You have to admit that levitating the toy UFO was a good bit of theater. So, analyzing and replicating the weird bendy metal is still of interest but the Hutch has no credibility going forward. Sure, it was faster and easier to fake a demo for TV instead of setting up a real experiment but there is no excuse for that.
@@NorseValhalla Not all videos attributed to John were made by him, many shows he took part in had a lot of material that had nothing to do with him and there have been a number of videos that have been claimed as his but were not. Is this one of them.
The one that interests me is the canon ball and the spanner. The most interesting are the jellyfication ones, particularly were you have things merging into other things and doing so as if they have lost mass.
It is the TONE of this video that grates. It almost looks as staged as the claims of staging it rails against.
@@magnetsandmushrooms I think Robert was paid to make this "debunking", so truth isn't important to him anymore.
I met John Hutchinson on the day he moved out from the place where he filmed his videos. I lived in the neighborhood and happened to be walking past his place while some of his equipment was being loaded onto a truck. I stopped to shake his hand and find out what was happening. I didn't ask any science questions, just noted that he was moving, and he had apparently been hired by a university science team to do his research and provided a warehouse to work out his experiments from instead of his one bedroom apartment in the city.
He may not have known entirely what he was doing, but the effects he caused the neighborhood were renowned. I only heard from the daughter of the owner of the neighboring apartment about tenants stories; doors moving unnaturally, water and electricity misbehaving and even energy vibrations on their skin.
I haven't heard from him since that time, about 2010, but I hope he is doing well.
Strange how these geniuses are often reclusive and regarded with suspicion in our towns and cities.
Lucky you to have met the gentlemen.
I have some theoretical and fantastical ideas myself which would probably be laughed out of the court of the theoretical physicist.
A few years ago I acquired a compact disc which had a story concerning Harrison's chronometer and someone who was locked up in Bedlam and had covered the wall of their cell with written calculations for a workable chronometer.
They say there is a fine line between genius and madness.
He has a channel on YT @klingonbaronessprincesskar5519
I wonder if there is something like a placebo effect going on here
Hi it’s me John hutchison iam relocated in California
Hello, do you know if he is still alive and if he wrote any books on his experiments ? I’m trying to find out how I can replicate these experiments too. I’m very interested in sound and vibration.
I have filmed one of John’s experiments personally in 2008 in Vancouver Canada I can see how most public as well as engineering minds struggle with accepting something that has not been even fully understood by John himself there are few who will never need a proof and those who even if presented with real evidence will continue to doubt
John certainly would understand the equipment he's using, the schematic, and the setup. There was a rumor he created scalar waves. John should be able to at least explain this with a diagram or schematic and John should be motivated to get others to reproduce his experiment -- UNLESS it is too dangerous. You don't want your kitten, for example, to run into the scalar wave field while it's on. You also don't want some immature little kid messing around with this stuff if it is at all dangerous. Putting this on youtube might be equivalent to posting the schematics of an atom bomb.
perfectly written, I am fully in the same opinion, thank you Tom. The question one can ask is, if I would choose to hide information by using youtube, and I can not prevent other posting, how would I do it?
is he still alive
@@NHLinden yes
@@morpher44 - The way academic work is generally done is by publishing your experiments and their results in peer-reviewed journals. Was there a reason Hutchison couldn't do that?
I think you can safely call this -
the "String Theory of the Hutchison Effect"
😂
Cheers, Robert
And how things are "inter-twined"with the string theory..!!😁
Side effects may include knots
@@synchro-dentally1965 i got you... Side effects may include wampum entanglement....
@oddjobbob LOL, dont forget the quantum entanglement
you start making me doubt the large hadron collider derived string theory all of a sudden.....
Of all the Hutchison Effect videos of things melting and moving and floating over the years, for some reason I have never seen this one with the obvious string. Also odd, is that Hutchinson can see too and would have also seen the obvious string. Something funny going on here. Was the string video made after the raids on his lab?
Now you're overthinking it.
That's not Hutchison"s garage where the original footage was shot, nor was that specific clip used in the original news story, though a similar one was. I know, I've seen it. This isnt the.only tech being held back from public access. If Tesla's research had been fully known, we would have free global wireless energy, flying cars, force fields that protect from cosmic rays and weaponry alike, and more. We are in the space age, and our space tech is being held back by the powers that be for some twisted reason. Sounds like we are being penned up when we should be spreading life through the solar system and beyond.
@@Ben111778 I hear ya. It is a shame that we ,as a civilization, just can't have only the good. Tesla was a bit sheltered from the inescapable evils of the world , as he began to show the us great things. He soon found a very cruel world surrounded him .
It looks like he realized all he had done and all the good things he discovered for a better life for all, would surely be equally used to harm the world he truly wanted to better.
I think he then blamed himself for what could come.
His life story and how he was beaten down to nothing, just for caring about the future of humanity more than the profits of influential, is tragic.
To me, his discovery of a sure and equal bad ,for good world, was in itself , a great discovery the world should have seen and changed. But of course, even that is hidden from us, as much as possible.
That's because when the cia raided his place and took all of his equipment, they made this film and released it as a debunking tool. Tried to make him look a charlatan. I have seen his original films with things like spanners tumbling aimlessly in the air with no static middle point at which a bit of cotton could be attached. Like all debunking videos this one leaves a lot to be desired
Agreed, this looks more like a attempt to discredit and hide knowledge.
Interestingly, it has now been shown to be possible to levitate objects using sound.
Historic texts on Tibetan Buddhists recounts how they levitate huge stones with group synchronized drumming techniques, which they did for days and boulders would be placed on high cliff plateau areas.
@@lilliansongs-w2dThe rhythm of the drums synchronised the workers possibly.
Most religions had supernatural events long ago when the average person could not read or write
Thanks for the interest. The boulders were said to be part of cliffside temples built also as a way to avoid ground invasions
and looting. @@davepowell7168
No doubt sound can move things. Anyone who's been in a car with an expensive sound system or some hard hitting subs knows that.
And lasers as well can levitate heavy objects.
Can you do a video of cold melting metals like he did?
If I was going to fake something like that I might use Gallium.
@@ColinWatters but the still doesn't make it melt inside of another block of solid metal so that they are both one thing.
@@craigboden9455 You can smelt things like dissimilar metals together like that.
Like, if you poured molten alum over a knife, and had the pour right, you could do the same
The knife will have a much higher melting point than the alum in that case. You'd be left with what that pic showed.
Been welding for 14 years. Seen all sorts of things like that.
One similar would be sticking a tungsten electrode into the weld puddle.
When cut, and or xrayed, you see a very clean tungsten electrode. Often still needle sharp, buried in the metal
@@Heliarc91 - you can also smash them together in a hydraulic press. Nothing spooky or unknown about anything that goober does. Hutchison I'm referring to.
@@Heliarc91 - you can also smash them together in a hydraulic press. Nothing spooky or unknown about anything that goober does. Hutchison I'm referring to.
Let us face it, if assuming this experiment managed to lift the ball up without any strings, it would still not classify as anti-gravity machine because it requires an external source of energy and a ball can be made to float in a field, for example a magnetic field, but ultimately the weight is being born by the magnetic field and its source which is resting on ground and not floating itself in air or in space.
This is the best explanation of how string theory really works !!
Ohh because they both involve string. I get it.. very clever.
Nylon strings😂
No string will go slack while the weight of the object is still suspended. The top left hand corner shows a string or wire going slack while the object was suspended, stationary or going up. It consistently works inversely to what it should be doing if it were used to pull the object aloft. The string/wire should never go slack while the object is suspended, it would always be taut by the weight of the object. Yet the wire is often in a slack state.
Having worked on high voltage devices it is normal for conductors to move around as you change the voltage or load levels.
As the object is in a state of change the wire is also in a state of change. That's all this shows.
Love Robert's videos and Hutchinson may have faked it, but the "evidence" in this is wrong. You just demonstrated that you can't observe two things at once or draw a proper correlation between them.
Cheers!
@@1nvertedReality I may educate myself a little before I even try to grasp your comment.
Lol good one 🇬🇧👍
I used to play around with subwoofers in my cars.. and it's quite obvious the power of sound. And how it tends to move things, anything and everything.
Just goes to show how powerful the medium of television really is in faking reality.
absolutely
That aspect of TV Media has been replaced and greatly surpassed recently by social media on the internet.
@@William_Hada yes when a business works diversify.
Nine eleven
Only one example
@@michaelmeier7453 the first wake up call for a few.
what about the 'torn metal'?
on the list mate
I agree, people are always complaining about a lack of physical evidence. Jon hutch has many bizarre samples. Mfmp has investigated with scanning electronic microscopes and found anomalies that prompted an entire theory that coincides with scientists like Jon archibald wheeler, Ken shoulders, bostic, and more.
@@ThinkingandTinkering Now a days he could use gallium passed off as steal, if didn't already. I've not really heard of the Hutchison Effect in maybe the last 15 years. It was very popular with Sept 11, of course.
I am soon going to do a 'tricks revealed'/'magic revealed' bunch of videos. Maybe starting in the new Financial Year... so maybe I'll get me some Gallium and do just that. I'll also 'pick on' Criss Angel'.
@@commonmisconceptions2365 MFMP?
These are Hutchison's own words, to a reporter...
Q: "So, how does it work?"
A: "By carefully manipulating the fluctuations in the quantum state of cosmic scalar energy to be in resonance with the zero-point energy vacuum through the use of concentrated gamma ray frequencies > 10^42 GeV. The real trick is getting the ferromagnetic crystal converter to enact a space charge via the insulated hyper-force barrier semiconductor. Then it's just a matter of applying the correct inverse proportional harmonic signatures to the atomic structure using a delta cascading reagent. This serves as a catalyst for the trans-dimensional proto-duotronic ionizing quasi-muons so they may have the desired effect of isolating the specific stellar-inertial sigma-waves of the spacial impulse distortion hyperbole. Once applied you should notice an instant change in the ultra diametric molecular composition of everyday household materials such as lanthanum and yttrium. If no effect is witnessed then you may need to increase the thermo-polarity oscillator index to the cubic nucleo-synthetic tetrahedron. For safety reasons, I recommend having an asymmetrical neural auxiliary apparatus on standby should the kinetic angular cosmic polymer induce a negative charge on the omega astral-nominal manifold sequencer."
Yeah. By the way, 10^42 GeV (of course NOT a measure of frequency) is about the energy of I forget how many Tzar Bombe.
The "string" in the left hand corner was possibly a wire with high current running through it causing it to move.
If it was a "string" like this man suggested then why does it get slack as the object floats and get tight when it sits back down? That is opposite of what it should do. Watch the string again, as the object moves the string moves in ways totally inconsistent with what it should be doing.
You actually replicated the effect! Nobody was able to produce his results for years! I was right all along!
P.s Stopped video at 2:40
Should have kept watching, sucker!
No string will go slack while the weight of the object is still suspended. The top left hand corner shows a string or wire going slack while the object was suspended, stationary or going up. It consistently works inversely to what it should be doing if it were used to pull the object aloft, but very consistent if it was an electrical conductor responding to a high voltage field.
The string/wire should never go slack while the object is suspended, it would always be taut by the weight of the object. Yet the wire is often in a slack state.
Having worked on high voltage devices it is normal for conductors to move around as you change the voltage or load levels.
As the object is in a state of change the wire is also in a state of change. That's all this shows. It proves the presence of a high voltage field.
Robert just demonstrated that he, or you, can't observe two things at once or draw a proper correlation between them.
Cheers!
@@1nvertedReality Irony -the expression of one's meaning by using language that normally signifies the opposite, typically for humorous or emphatic effect. Sucker.
John is amazing. I watched many many of his experiments & the wild characteristics they protreyed. Fascinating time. Best wishes John
Funny, it's amazing how anti-gravity looks like it's hanging from a string.
Question? since you have obviously brought our attention to the string. Can someone explain to me why the string goes slack as the object ascends and tensions when the object descends? Is it possible the string served as a pole for the object to keep a linear orientation?
Have you looked into the Townsend Brown Effect? Asymmetrical Capacitors charged to over 20K Volts will levitate. See: "Asymmetrical Capacitor Lifters" Some say Ion Propulsion, while others disagree. What do you think?
ionic lifters work, although this is a delicate force. I think "Evil Genius Parts, Book 1 - Chapter 1 - Anti-Gravity Project" describes how to build one as I'm sure there are other books that describe this. It would be fun to mess around with and replicate.
You have a sharp eye. Remember watching these videos many years ago and didnt notice anything unusal even though I was looking
Now fuse 2 different metals together then
Robert can you tell us about the experimental setup? I want to replicate that experiment!
I met John at Satellite Electronics back in the late 1980's. He seemed legit and sincere to me.
Still may be, this video is bad science. No string will go slack while the weight of the object is still suspended. The top left hand corner shows a string or wire going slack while the object was suspended, stationary or going up. It consistently works inversely to what it should be doing if it were used to pull the object aloft, but very consistent if it was an electrical conductor responding to a high voltage field.
The string/wire should never go slack while the object is suspended, it would always be taut by the weight of the object. Yet the wire is often in a slack state.
Having worked on high voltage devices it is normal for conductors to move around as you change the voltage or load levels.
As the object is in a state of change the wire is also in a state of change. That's all this shows. It proves the presence of a high voltage field.
Robert just demonstrated that he can't observe two things at once or draw a proper correlation between them.
Cheers!
"Only liars think the Truth hurts because it destroys their illusions and delusions...To those that seek it it is music to their ears."
"Lie is at the centre of beLIEve because only the truth shall set you free whether you believe it or not."
-- ancient clown
I have a schematic of the Effect, Thomas Bearden made a small image of the actual setup (that is not shown in the video) Bearden created the MEG Generator.
Alright I enjoyed this because I got hooked into this shenanigans but how did he do the ice cream and bowling ball video?
I used to watch Hutchinson videos back when TH-cam had NO ads.
His videos sent me on a 10 year bender of making free energy devices and frequency generators.
Thanks to Hutchinson and guys like you I have learned about magnetism, electronics, and even some coding.
I finally concluded that Hutchinson was fake because he never once explains anything in his videos. Not even close.
Free energy is also fake btw.
Lovin your channel…. Your kind of videos are what made TH-cam.
Oh, well let me fill you in then. In his own words...
Q: "So, how does it work?"
A: "By carefully manipulating the fluctuations in the quantum state of cosmic scalar energy to be in resonance with the zero-point energy vacuum through the use of concentrated gamma ray frequencies > 10^42 GeV. The real trick is getting the ferromagnetic crystal converter to enact a space charge via the insulated hyper-force barrier semiconductor. Then it's just a matter of applying the correct inverse proportional harmonic signatures to the atomic structure using a delta cascading reagent. This serves as a catalyst for the trans-dimensional proto-duotronic ionizing quasi-muons so they may have the desired effect of isolating the specific stellar-inertial sigma-waves of the spacial impulse distortion hyperbole. Once applied you should notice an instant change in the ultra diametric molecular composition of everyday household materials such as lanthanum and yttrium. If no effect is witnessed then you may need to increase the thermo-polarity oscillator index to the cubic nucleo-synthetic tetrahedron. For safety reasons, I recommend having an asymmetrical neural auxiliary apparatus on standby should the kinetic angular cosmic polymer induce a negative charge on the omega astral-nominal manifold sequencer."
I wish other people would have your moment of clarity.
@@artdehls9100 🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂
@Grim FPV Without that ability, what are we? :D
Explain how lodestone with no energy going into it, has magnetic energy coming out of it? A lodestone is cold fusion.
Funny man attempts to destroy another man's work while destroying his own reputation.
Another man's "work"?
Is there an echo in here?
@@soundmattersuk
Yes very nasty person who did no research on my work sad iam getting permission to get this video off mr smith also attracts others
Glad to see you around.@@klingonbaronessprincesskar5519
It’s John Hutchison himself! There were videos that were important as well as web pages with devices that you have invented on your website which is no longer up... Is there somewhere I can find them?
There was a video that was also supposed to uploaded which was going to give the details of the voltages, frequencies, and devices involved with your famous John Hutchison effect, but I was never able to see it
Thanks Robert! Always enjoy your educational and informative videos! Very appreciative of the work seen from both yourself and from Luke! Cheers!
No string will go slack while the weight of the object is still suspended. The top left hand corner shows a string or wire going slack while the object was suspended, stationary or going up. It consistently works inversely to what it should be doing if it were used to pull the object aloft. The string/wire should never go slack while the object is suspended, it would always be taut by the weight of the object. Yet the wire is often in a slack state.
Having worked on high voltage devices it is normal for conductors to move around as you change the voltage or load levels.
As the object is in a state of change the wire is also in a state of change. That's all this shows.
Love Robert's videos and Hutchinson may have faked it, but the "evidence" in this is wrong. You just demonstrated that you can't observe two things at once or draw a proper correlation between them.
Cheers!
yea that does seem to cover it except can you do that with a cannon ball and can you replicate the metal deformation effects??
And items in the neighbor's place.
The metal samples can’t be debunked as they simply exists and require explanation
There's a sci-fi short story about an engineer who discovers a very very weak antigravity effect and gets fired for trying to study it on his spare time in the lab... so he makes a little tin rocket and hangs it from a string to take to public fairs as a showman's toy and wows all the kids with it. He runs into an old associate of an associate who offers to buy the thing because it looks so real and he wants to use it to trick his friends.
At some point he plays with it and discovers that the string alone isn't strong enough to lift the tin rocket... the device and the landing pad MUST be turned on.
Eugene Podkletnov? How do we discern pseudo-science from the truth
I get addicted to this stuff sometimes digging into conspiracy
@@sprig3432 Look up Adam Weishaupt
Your first congratulations is on how the many fake video's on TH-cam are needing further explanation. The second is showing the second coil not being wired in anyway, therefore no resonance is possible. Thank you Rob, you're a very honourable man.
I agree with everything you said and Robert is a trickster but in the right way 🤔👍😎
I didn't want people watching half the video and thinking it was real - a few Easter eggs were necessary I thought - just so folks would say hang on a sec!!!
@@ThinkingandTinkering anyone watching half your videos don't understand the essence of what you are about and the honour and integrity that is Robert Murray Smith
@James Cunliffe 😂👍 where's Gerry & Sylvia Anderson when you need em
The are quite a few on the tv too, not called tv programming for nothing!. Best wishes.
nothing to apologise for, i liked the video. its people like you that make a better tomorrow.
cheers mate
One of his pictures is of a penny embedded in stainless steel. You can duplicate this by using a Bismuth and indium alloy in place of the stainless steel. You can buy bars of this alloy that melt at the temperature of boiling water, and cast them into a plastic mold.
but the metals have been analyzed, so theres that....
I did not know about that.
lol, I saw Hutchison Anti-Gravity Effect in the title and just had to watch. I did notice the thread before you started and thought to myself "Yep, he is going to reproduce it exactly as it was done!"
Thanks for the top notch reproduction and the explanation. We need more like this.
The string/wire should have never gone slack while under load of the object. This video proves nothing other than you and Robert can't observe two things at once or draw a proper correlation.
@@1nvertedReality
Indeed. I don't think the video is the original Hutchinson video to begin with.
@@jefft6802 wait... so the CIA faked with a string that goes slack when you pull on it?
Great video. I was hoping you would do the ice cream floating out of the cup......all while maintaining the shape of the cup. Do you know that one?
I stand behind you whole heartedly!
Interesting. How did he levitate a dollop of ice cream I wonder?
it was floating within a medium of waves directed at it or surrounding it, passing by which were emitted from an antenna. Rather than something you see pushing or holding you up it's a vibrating wave of energy, everything is about resonance.
Filmed upside down.
Simple. He filmed it melting upside down.
All of the objects where on string, right? Bowling ball, also? Metal riped apart by the string?
Reminds me of when Mylow was busted using a motor and fishing line to turn his Howard Johnson "Magnet motor" replication. The guys over on the Overunity site worked hard and finally proved this was how it was done. A lot of people wasted a lot of money and time trying to replicate Mylow's device.
Hilariously, there are those at _Overunity_ still working on their own silly machines, that have no chance of working.
Are you saying sound waves can't make something levitate?
Can you link to his original video to verify the one shown here is really his?
How do you think he made metal warp in such strange ways?
Thanks
Clockwise, counter clockwise, bubble, pressure, resonance, changing the atmosphere around it, cancelation zone, second frequency. There's more to it than just a string. In a sense of most minds it's impossible. Having the government take away your equipment 3 times. There's more to it than a string.
Wait what? What gov't took what away? (no jokes here) I went deep down the rabbit hole and then hit this channel that wants me to pay for videos about making supercapacitors at home - this is the "logical" gate I needed to find. Need more data. What you got - what's further down the rabbit-hole? Cheers!
Hutchinson claims he had equipment confiscated, he also claimed that the military had used his equipment to "do 9/11". Other people claim Elvis is alive and well and living in the secret Nazi moonbase.
@@Steve_Coates it's a good thing we can always trust our government to do the right thing.
@@freedomer342 Elvis fan?
Is this the same with the bug wing covers smacking into each other to levitate one above the other?
I was watching the boxes of vinyl gloves. Pah! Misdirection 😹
O no, now I'll have all kinds of hocus pocus videos in my recommendations for the next few hours lol 🤣
This intuitively makes sense to me. Science is about asking nature questions to learn it's patterns, not upholding oyr beliefs with emotional framework. I still keep an open mind, but extreme skepticism is a healthy trait in these matters I think.
Appreciate your demo. 🍻
I agree with you mate and cheers
@@ThinkingandTinkering u should reply to bob greenyer in your comment section
It makes sense that the object goes up as the wire goes slack? As long as the object is suspended the string/wire should never go slack. Agree about being skeptical but don't base your skepticism on this video.
@@1nvertedReality I don't and actually believe John has important things to teach. I have asked special effects people and magicians about the floating cannon ball or jellification of metal. They have all been stumped and can'tgivea good explanation.
I also talked with John and he is a vary caring and brilliant guy. He will say straight up he doesn't follow the proper scientific methods, he just likes playing with stuff. 😅
@@officialdiadonacs From what vids I've seen he seems genuinely a good guy. Good to hear it from someone that has met him. Thanks
Spending a lazy day off re-watching everything Hutchison.
What about the cannonball
In one of his videos?
And the fusing of unlike
Materials?
For those who are disappointed that levitation due to the falsity of the Hutchison Effect, go now and look into "quantum locking". You just might restore your hope in levitation.
Wasn’t just levitation, he transmuted metals.
Fact.
The top left hand corner shows a string or wire going slack while the object was stationary or going up. It consistently works inversely to what it should be doing if it were used to pull the object aloft. The string/wire should never go slack while the object is suspended, it would always be taut by the weight of the object. Yet the wire is often in a slack state.
Having worked on high voltage devices it is normal for conductors to move around as you change the voltage or load levels.
As the object is in a state of change the wire is also in a state of change. That's all this shows.
Love Robert's videos and Hutchinson may have faked it, but this "evidence" in this is wrong. You just demonstrated that you can't observe two things at once or draw a proper correlation between them.
Cheers!
Thanks, you really cleared that up for all of us.
The world needed this video. Many thanks
@Robert Murray-Smith
I think it's important to point out the string was slack while slowly descending. @just goes to show how powerful the medium of TV is. Pointing out that there is a string lifting the object paints a story that this was faked. While at the same time the string was slack as the object very slowly descended. If a video was made discussing a breakthrough on partial levitation explaining how a string was used to lift the object and you can see how once the object was lifted the string was released and the object slowly drifted to the ground you would be marveling over the advancements he is making towards levitation technology. @ Robert Murray Smith. I respect what you do and I enjoy what you bring to the community. You have both the credentials and the passion. Invention and discovery are about doing things that nobody has done before. If everybody only did what was known to work or be good enough we wouldn't have everything we do today. The light bulb was not made with understood science of the time. It was made with trial and error. John Hutchinson has a passion for bringing something to the table that no one else bothered with researching because they lived within the constraints of good enough. I think it's important to recognize John's passion for sustainable long-term energy solutions such as his solid state batteries that he's been working with. I think that if you're going to make a video about John Hutchinson's string you should have pointed out and observed for yourself that the string appears to be used to lift and the string appears to be slack while the object slowly descends. I'm disappointed that you made such a matter of fact video suggesting that it was faked. I would rather listen to you talk about the effectiveness or ineffectiveness of his solid state crystal batteries and listen to an educated analysis of the materials he was using.
The behavior of the wire is consistent with the presence of a high voltage field. Robert proved that albeit unintentionally.
3:18 but the wire goes or seems slack when the item goes up? are we sure that's not a safety tether? -I see your point though, for sure.
If John was pulling on the wire(not string) it would get taught when the saucer went up and get lax when the saucer rested on the table, but this is opposite of what is observed. Besides, lets be honest, choosing one video out of many, to discredit John, is quite frankly Cherry Picking.
Yes, and as John points out in a video he hangs the toy from a string.
As you said, it's a wire. And a wire would probably not look lax as it would retain its stiffness.
How did he do the melting things together
What a waste of time. Here I thought this might be serious. Nowhere near the equipment and knowledge of John. He may have been quirky, or autistic, but making fun isn't doing proper investigation. I don't care who you are. I wouldn't buy any of your material. Most of the comments I read here are like the kids wanting to agree with the school yard bully.
What was that deal with longitudinal waves
payed for discrediting hutchison ... in the name of the goverment
Sad really that easy to insult and discredit mainstream science has a stick up it's arse
John is the man.
Could it be that John did use a string in some of his experiments because he did not want to cause too much suspicion ?
Hell no. Hutchinson and Searles are the real deal.
@@jefft6802
Heck yes it’s real .
Oh thank you sir for putting this video together I was losing sleep over this.
Thank you for being fringe-curious. I find it refreshing to hear a critique from someone who isn't condescending or zealous for mainstream science.
That was not John Hutchinson's original video with the string.
It's propaganda to keep to public oblivious to advanced technologies that rewrite physics and expose the reality of the world in which we live.
The charlatan in your video reminds me of a experimenter that I was sent on an interview from a TV station, he had done several interviews with all sorts of places and no one had ever questioned what he was saying, when I showed up with the cameras and he pulled out drawers of resistors soldered end-to-end the next drawer would have capacitor soldered and to end the next drawer would have transistors soldered in series and he had lights flashing on the front panels of these drawers he pulled out, the trickery was exposed, this fellow even got grant money and equipment to search for extra terrestrials from his home. Needless to say I turned off the cameras put them back in their cases tore down the tripods and headed out.
Vous avez totalement raison, c'est un charlatan!
@@Victurf nine sppraken ze doitche
@@401ksolar TTC
I've always been a fan of Eric Laithwaite and his gyroscope endeavours. His Christmas lectures are on youtube and are great! Not that these are in any way antigravity, but maybe could be a path toward manipulating masses in new ways.
Look up Sandy Kidd's device. He got it to work after building it in his garage by himself over 20+ years. He linked up with Eric Laithwaite before Eric died. He used opposite gyroscopes to lift the mass of the machine.
See the Stan Deyo lectures on antigravity on youtube.
I gree Mr. Neste.
@@morpher44 Yes.
Gravity is inertia like all forces.
now make solid metal break apart before our eyes.
The only people who would be upset by this are the charlatans and they deserve no apology.
the problem with debunking theory is, the wire goes in the wrong direction.
if the object goes up that mean somebody pulls at the string but you see it hang down and.
i cant see a direct connection from the movement of the object and movement of the string
Well... how do you explain his fused metals and floating liquids?
Why is he string slack as the object ascends?
It isn't suspended all the time
Well done Rob, a great exposure.
Videos like his have probably enticed many people to waste much time and money trying to replicate his experiments.
There have been many others over the years with similar claims, I hope you continue to offer "alternative" explanations to their work also, it makes for an insightful and entertaining series. 😉
cheers mate
Martin-I have replicated some of Hutchinson's experiments with crystal batteries successfully. They produce voltage but unfortunately very little amperage, however they have very peculiar properties (increase output voltage when placed on a load).
I didn't see him debunk even half the claims Hutchinson had. Only one. With a very lightweight object
For all the people saying "it's fake". I lived not far from this guy John Hutchison, heard the stories seen his George Knapp interview, when the government came to "shut his lab down due to safety concerns" it was in the news they did in fact "confiscate" his lab when he refused a contract to work with them. He later built a new one in the next town over and the same thing happend this time u.s military was interested too. Before the government came he managed to convince the German government to buy his equipment and fund a project to do with using the hutchison effect to clear pollution from oceans which he is still pursuing to this day.
Sounds like you cant figure out how he did it and decided to use an old magician trick to throw shade🤷🏻♂️
He played one of John's video's, you can see the string in that one. Look to the left side as he said in the video.
Can you get metal to blind together?
I recall seeing some other experiments where he had bowling balls "levitating" in a box. I think the way he achieved this was to attach the camera to the box, then invert the box (and camera) in such a way it looked like the ball was "falling upwards".
Sounds like nasa
Classic technique used by Hollywood numerous times in various films, for decades.
I went to find Hutchison about 8 years ago. He drove into a Walgreens in his dark red Ford van, and walked inside dressed like a woman. What a damn freak. That was it for me.
Smart ppl always go crazy in the end
He dislikes male aggressiveness and prefers portraying femininity, nothing illegal about that. And it keeps people like you away from him, doesn't it? Kind of smart if you ask me.
Only thing I saw was that the ball rose up in such a way that it was obviously suspended from a single point at it's top. Obviously a string. If it was real it wouldn't reorient itself as it left the ground. An object in a weightless state won't turn heavy side down. Common sense...
Hear me out. If you think about it, that's exactly what it might do. Hypothetically. Because of the force upwards acting against gravity.
@@MrGoatflakes It seems obvious that you don't know much about gravity, or the word hypothesis. I mean for fucks sake, he showed you the string. How obtuse can you be? Have you never seen a video from the ISS, or the vomit comet? I don't suppose you would know what that is now would you? That's the Boeing 747 that the USA uses to train astronauts in 0-G... that means no gravity. Because if you had seen any of those, you'd know how stupid you really sound.
Maybe you should do some research before you spout off next time.
Thankyou kind sir for the great; in-the- spirit- of-Houdini, looking out for us. Your time taken is most appreciated.
You are very welcome
You're going to piss a bunch of people off I happen to agree with you there are two types and if someone is lying they need to be exposed we just have to make sure to do our due diligence and not discredit people thank you for the video and hold on tight cuz this is going to be a bumpy one
lol - it might well be mate - but if we do get rid of the tricks we must be left with the truth - surely?
@@ThinkingandTinkering yes speak to Bob Greenyer.
My problem with your string theory is that its movements doesn't cohere with the object. The string is slack when the object moves up, when it should have been straight and tight. It should only be slack when the object is resting on the ground.
Pulleys☺️
It does cohere. It proves the presence of high voltage field. As power goes up, object rises and the wire conductor is pulled towards the center of the field creating the slack effect. When the field is stable the wire goes straight again. It isn't slacking, it just a loose conductor being pulled toward the field every time the field strength is in a state of change. Judging from the amount the conductor deflected towards the field he's playing with some pretty high DC voltages.
Hahaha I knew this was a debunk firstly because it was obvious but most importantly the distinct lack of your maniacal laughter as you cast your scientific magic rob! 😉
I first noticed the way the toy swung in the air as a pendulum would, then how you cut to a close up with the background filling the frame vertically. Add a Tesla name-drop and season with some sciency words and voila! Nice setup.
I'm wondering if this guy (the guy onscreen) is state sponsored to do a hatchet job on a clever man ahead of his time.
"state sponsored"..... I think hutchinsonm charging people $100 to see shitty vhs copies of his faked videos tells us all we really need to know. Gullible sucker sponsoring is a much more reliable source of income for the alternative new age woo industry
Have you reviewed Alexie”s graviflyer?
hahah, i could tell from the movement that there was a fishing line on there, Hutchinson's items would move randomly and not have any particular balancing point.. llittle bit disappointed you faked it but good effort lol..
So what you are suggesting is Hutchinson is a more accomplished magician than Rob! 😄
@@martinwragg8246 not at all, what I am saying is having watched multiple interviews and experiments the effect Hutchinson produced was far more random and uncontrolled, if you have seen the videos then you know what I mean 🙏. Nikola Tesla was reported to have achieved similar effects in his lab and the marks on the ceiling can still be seen to this day 🤔. Although Rob did a good job faking it, there is significant evidence that it is a real phenomena that is not understood with the current physics we have..
cheers mate
@RobertMurray whats you're opinion on the flatEarth bipolar model?
i can't really give a short answer to that mate - but i can give it a go at trying to explain how i see the flat earth view
Wow! I never caught that in John's video before. I feel cheated by John as I always had some respect and admiration for his work. Glad you pointed this out! I've always been pretty sharp catching the B. S. but my own desire to see someone figure out some level of antigravity got my acceptance ahead of my questionable caution. Thanks for sharing your video.
I never caught this on Johns videos also, so I am wandering is this really a Johns video or fake replica of the real Johns video. Mister Robert could provide us the link to the original.
@@alequ83 I remember seeing this video back in the early 2000's. I can't remember seeing the string but it was pretty hard to see anything in those old quicktime and realmedia videos.
This guy is spinning johns work...
Hutchison effect real
Well, after watching that, isnt everybody?! After all, that's exactly the effect they wanted to create with that fake video that was never in the original footage. I saw the original footage, and non of his experiments moved like that. Hutchison demonstrated how sound waves could not only create levitation, but break down the naturally occurring bonds in matter. That spiked the interest of the governments, promoted the raids, and he ended up moving to the US under an agreement to continue his experiments and share his findings with the US DOD. There are news reports south of the border.
As an amateur Foley artist, the first thing I noticed was that the buzzing sound you recorded sounded like it was close mic'd and thus too clear and loud and "up front" as compared to what you'd expect to be from a natural ambient effect. There was also a little bit of choppiness in volume im guessing from inconsistencies from splicing the audio in.
That said, it is a great video, and adding the "incidental sound" does help "sell" the illusion.
I totally respect what you said about charlatans. They would do anything to keep humanity in the dark for their own monetary greed. Your channel is first class just like yourself Robert. God bless and peace to you Sir. Peace is what the world really needs that right now.
Lmao pander away
But how do you explain how a live rabbit is pulled from a hat?
The pendulum effect gives the string away, as well as the turning upright of the toy as it rises. I never believed anything Hutchinson said , did, or put out. I remember him being on some documentary and the narrator calling him “Dr. Hutchinson”. Got a good laugh out of that one.
I'm upset because you didn't put a link to the ball I want one for my grandbabies
Thank you!! Fantastic demonstration of the Hutchison effect!!
At the end of this sentence I will list everything I understood about this discussion:
I haven’t even got to the bit where you’ve suspended it from a string yet and that you’re clearly just having a laugh, fair enough I guess it’s low hanging fruit and an easy video to make for views, but if you want to take it just a little more seriously-
You’re missing something which is high potential electrostatic fields and radio frequency modulation these are the two missing components.
Look, everyone knows that John faked a bunch of his videos, after he got way too much of the wrong kind of interest, this is part of the historical narrative of John Hutchinson, perhaps you missed that bit…? (maybe all of his antigravity videos can be dismissed fair enough, but that doesn’t solve the problem).
Unfortunately for you and everyone else studying this stuff it doesn’t actually invalidate all of the effects that have been observed by John-
Life is more complicated than black and white binary thinking, one needs to look into the entire situation and the context around it, John actually had the Navy and all kinds of other groups go out there and visit him repeatedly randomly showing up at his lab and even interfere with his ability to continue doing what he was doing.
It’s not about beliefs, because belief have nothing to do with science, nor is it about being offended but the fact that you would mention those two things shows that you’re aware of them which is odd.
No one concerned with Science should be concerned with those two issues causing offence is besides the point.
Equally though in the interests of discovery one cannot simply take a position of pure scepticism, because that will have one dismissing phenomena that might otherwise be of interest-
Even if something is completely fake entirely doesn’t mean that it couldn’t actually be done to believe so is fooling oneself.
Now let’s see you replicate the collapsing twisting jellified piece of metal- The welding of incompatible materials in real time on video and all of the other weird stuff that he’s managed to do- of course the problem with John is that no one really knows how he did this and it’s entirely possible he’s not entirely sure himself.
It would make sense that after John couldn’t reproduce the effect on demand, he might have ended up faking some videos having attracted interest, equally it’s possible that he might of made intentionally fake videos to send certain organisations in the opposite direction having attracted unwarranted attention- no one likes being spied on that kind of thing has a funny way of making people feel uncomfortable and regretting their choices.
Life can be genuinely complicated- not everything is necessarily as it seems, even if it is as it seems 😂
Having written all that, great video I really enjoyed it and I do like your work, so please don’t take this the wrong way.:)
I don't take it the wrong way mate - I am in no way trying to rubbish anything - all I can say right now is John faked a few of his Anti-Gravity vids - that's it - I don't go from that to say everything is rubbish - I mean what do I know? not a lot tbh
You claim that blind hyper-skepticism is a bad thing and I agree. I think it is best to be very open-minded but that must be tempered with a healthy portion of skepticism. To be taken seriously and trusted by others one must have an impeccable history of honesty. Hutchinson violated that trust by faking some videos.
@@William_Hada Oh yes I wholeheartedly agree, I in no way wish to dunk upon scepticism here.
Scepticism when properly applied, becomes absolutely vitally important with regard to the scientific method.
It’s just that there are many forms of philosophical scepticism, actually academia itself is a form of ancient Greek philosophical scepticism. (and in my personal opinion perhaps not the best school, though I digress) Scepticism forms a vital tool and axis of analysis when used responsibly.
Yes trust was violated however violating trust isn’t discreditation of scientific hypotheses. It certainly isn’t a good indicator but that might be actually even favourite for other reasons.
@@William_Hada The point about him faking some bits of video are well known.
The explanation turns out to be more interesting than the actual faking.
It is a logical inference that if someone is faking something that discredits anything else they may have done.
Since the predicate and the conclusion are in fact logically disconnected or at least only connected by assumption, and since the association presents a very seldom question and implicit inference of discreditation, it’s quite easy to use that to one’s advantage.
Quite why someone would need to do this might not make sense to anyone who haven’t found themselves in such a position..
- clearly VERY few people would ever find themselves in such a position, so it becomes quite hard to judge..
Anyway the other supposition and it is a supposition is that JH wished to get rid of some of the more ‘troublesome’ official interest that he had inadvertently attracted.
To quote him:
“ I knew I had something, I was just putting it out on what was at that time a new video platform, it (youtube) wasn’t like it is now, the video’s were originally anonymous, I didn’t expect much interest beyond other peoples opinions. I was looking for people who were doing similar experimentation and having similar results to communicate with. In the end people demanded more and more evidence, there was an enormous amount of pressure and that ended up getting in the way.”
Yes, that may sound like something out of a science-fiction movie, so scepticism absolutely becomes necessary and a valid response. There is a tangible difference though between scepticism and cynicism.
The intelligence community really are actual entities that do exist.
Weapons development represents a financially enormous and highly secretive Industry with enormous amounts of money and power at their disposal.
One can very easily establish from declassified documents, as completely irrational as it may seem, that all kinds of bizarre and borderline harassment and sometimes downright illegal activities are undertaken around individuals who develop something of interest.
This is not hearsay, one can search the CIA‘s own database and find examples of this.
People don’t ridicule the Havana syndrome events these day’s, but they used to before parts of the event’s were classified.
In fact those who were suffering from the influences of whatever was going on, certainly had a lot of cynicism and disbelief.
Such that subsequently it’s admitted that this tendency toward dismissiveness actually hindered and heavily delayed adequate scientist investigation and that should serve as a lesson moving forward. When it was finally investigated much of the evidence that could have been studied was no longer present.
There are those that think the entire thing was a matter of mass psychosis, but that would not account for the physical evidence in the form of medical reports. The entire situation must be regarded therefore as a mystery with outcomes taking various different rational positions on the topic ranging from complete scepticism through two validating theories on non-ionising electromagnetic radiation and cross-frequency modulation on the autonomic and nervous system functions of the human organism.
Even science-fiction writers have come under scrutiny on occasion as bizarre as irrational as that may sound.
If you’re interested in this you could do worse than looking at the historical Marconi Deaths - One must stress though the whole topic has not really faced scientific scrutiny, there are many conspiracy focused spins on it, although the events though are factual, although even the most sceptical person would have to admit collating those events might be a mistake even though taken collectively they do certainly look awfully suspicious.
Point being when one stumbles into such a spooky domain all kinds of strange things that are absolutely unusual can take place and having unusual reactions to them can actually be quite rational.
Think of the number of celebrities who in trying to get rid of the attention of the tabloid press have only made things worse, believe it or not discrediting oneself can be enormously powerful if used correctly.
Just because most people do not think of this or it seems unlikely doesn’t mean that is the case.
@@hominidaetheodosia He faked videos to get rid of a certain portion of his audience? That sounds completely rediculous to me. It sounds like the actions of a person out of touch with reality.
Excellent program. For the sake of our own sanity and for science, it pays to begin as a sceptic, though never as a debunker. Those who choose to merely debunk are negative by nature, and hold back progress as much as they can.
I love how you debunk scamers. You should make more debunking videos and put it into a playlist
If only he would show the actual videos Hutchinson released. These are not them, I saw solid objects levitating and stretching, melting and merging. Saw ice cream levitating up out from it cone. Things that couldn't be faked.
The top left hand corner shows a string or wire going slack while the object was stationary or going up. It consistently works inversely to what it should be doing if it were used to pull the object aloft. The string/wire should never go slack while the object is suspended, it would always be taut by the weight of the object. Yet the wire is often in a slack state.
Having worked on high voltage devices it is normal for conductors to move around as you change the voltage or load levels.
As the object is in a state of change the wire is also in a state of change. That's all this shows.
Love Robert's videos and Hutchinson may have faked it, but this "evidence" in this is wrong. You just demonstrated that you can't observe two things at once or draw a proper correlation between them. This video debunks nothing.
Cheers!
How cute that you think you figured it out I've built a device that produces the effects on command I even talked to John about it the zone of incursion where both longitudinal emf waves produces this after the process of 4 wave mixing phase-conjugation occurs but also the anomalous balls of plasma in the zone
Thankyou so much! You help me to stop wasting my precious time of my way too short live. Keep it up.
Mybe you could have a look at the videos on the youtube channel called daniel's inventions. That could serve lots of guys like me a lot. I believe in free energy, but I end up hesitating, when it comes to copying the posted experiments on TH-cam.
Great suggestion!
I came up with a few designs based on the particle physics facts I've discovered since 95, along with research into working tech.
Deyo's lifter was impressive. I improved that design. The geometric interaction of rotating columns of charge is key. This can be used to accelerate the heavy end of the posited pole at a 3rd point where charge is forced to squeeze through in a forced decision.
Splitting charge and folding zero point to generate free energy at once. That's the secret to portable super efficient antigrav.
Nice demo. It was just the wet bus ticket to reality I needed, gently slapping my face. Apologising afterwards = very smooth.
Think again. No string will go slack while the weight of the object is still suspended. The top left hand corner shows a string or wire going slack while the object was suspended, stationary or going up. It consistently works inversely to what it should be doing if it were used to pull the object aloft. The string/wire should never go slack while the object is suspended, it would always be taut by the weight of the object. Yet the wire is often in a slack state.
Having worked on high voltage devices it is normal for conductors to move around as you change the voltage or load levels.
As the object is in a state of change the wire is also in a state of change. That's all this shows. It proves the presence of a high voltage field.
Robert just demonstrated that he can't observe two things at once or draw a proper correlation between them.
Cheers!
@@1nvertedReality maybe you didn't get the joke. It's a good wake-up call.
@@TomAtkinson Second joke I didn't get? Must be losing my sense of humor. I thought it would be my hairline that went first.
This was very much like those experiments in the 1960's with televisions and rockets. More or less everyone appeared to fall for them. Oh and a bit like the experiment over the last two years.. Best wishes.
indeed mate
I get that but how did he get the poon In The metal or Fracture the metal.
right now - i don't know how he did that
Terawatts.