Anti-Gravity: The Secret Space Race | Weird Science | Earth Science
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 15 พ.ค. 2024
- Anti-gravity: The Secret Space Race.
Best of Earth Science: bit.ly/EarthLabOriginals
Best of BBC Earth: bit.ly/TheBestOfBBCEarthVideos
Gravity, we've all heard of the word, but do you realise it might be able to be manipulated. So much so that the race to be able to control gravity started. This doesn't mean the pathway to the finish line is easy. Dr Josie Peters and the team explain more.
This is a channel from BBC Studios who help fund new BBC programmes. Service information and feedback: bbcworldwide.com/vod-feedback-... - วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี
![🔴 [TRỰC TIẾP] U20 Thái Lan VS LPBank Ninh Bình | Cúp VTV9 - Bình Điền 2024 | JET STUDIO](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/3wRNdAy3DXs/mqdefault.jpg)
I'm reading a book about anti-gravity, I just can't put it down.
What's the book?
Lol
@@aymanissam6566 it’s a joke.
You clever. You should just let it go.
Boomtish, good one
I'm just a layman. Most everything I know about physics comes from popular science articles and random videos. Still, every shred of information I've encountered suggests that, of the four fundamental forces, gravity is the least understood. That begs the question: "How can you hope to control something when you don't know what it is?"
My exact thought.
You now know what most scientists know. Now find someone to pay you to prove yourself and everyone else and God, WRONG. The answer is there. It's just at this point we don't really know the question.
Excellent point. Imagine if we dropped a nuclear reactor in the Wild West. Before they could get the iridium shielding off, they'd all drop dead. How the hell would we even begin to dissect something like an "anti-gravity" reactor?
it does not "beg the question".
Supersymmetry Theory. Gravity is a force, as with any force it’s polarity theoretically can be reversed. Dirac’s equation revealed this fact (matter, anti matter). Opposites exist. Gravity is carried in a mass carrying particle called “The Higgs Boson” theorised by Higgs and recently discovered LHC. As the particle interacts with background Higgs field whilst in motion it’s mass increases. The greater the mass the more energy required to move to ever increasing higher speed. Therefore light speed is unachievable as it would take all the energy in the universe to move that object to light speed as Einstein predicted. If you switch the polarity of Higgs Boson or switch off it’s ability to interact with the Higgs Field you can anti gravity. Higgs boson carries mass, the greater the mass the greater the gravity it generates. Switch the polarity of the mass (“anti mass” or negative mass) you switch the polarity of gravity hence anti gravity. If the mass of the object does not increase with speed then faster than light speed travel is possible. The faster you travel the slower time ticks, so you can also travel through time (forward in this case). Time itself flows forward. If you can create enough negative mass you can bend the very fabric of space time, to fold in on itself to a point previously in time (backwards time travel).
When studying physics at university, I came up with a new perspective on the phenomena of gravity.
I have an experiment that uses spinning fields to create areas of time dilation and space contraction (relativity).
In these "nodes" gravity appeared reversed.
I'm intrigued, is this experiment you have a physical or mathematical (on paper) experiment?
Yeah, can we get a little more info?
I'd suspect charged objects in a gravitational potential field behave differently than those with a neutral relation to their attractor. So they will take on a torque effect. It's why a lot of orbital bodies spin rather than end up tidally locked. If there's something to that which could be exploited, it'd be interesting to see how that works. (Also suspect the dielectric constant has something to do with that somehow. A vacuum has a teeny teeny tiny bit of resistance to change in moving charges or electromagnetic fields.)
My apologies to all.
Yes I did come up with an alternative hypothesis on warped space, gravity and designed some experiments but these had to do with the relationship between relative movements of energy fields, time dilation/space contraction and gravity.
I was a bit inebriated when I watched this and mentioned my experiment in an irrelevant, tongue in cheek manner.
@@huepix so you may sense a gravity wave turned 180 degrees by turning 180 degrees time/space
I would love to hear your take on Dr. Salvatore Pais' patents. :) Keep up your great work! Regards from Germany
Richard Feynman postulated that a chair was a nifty anti-gravity device, and likely the only sort we'd see.
In one of his books Brian Greene said consider the electrostatic force holding the atoms in the molecules of chair together, your body together, the soil in the ground beneath you are all defeating gravity. Dr. Greene also said the electrostatic force is, I'm paraphrasing, something like a million million billion times stronger than gravity.
all it takes is to understand what gravity really is and what it's actually doing to create the results that we see, and then artificially create those conditions. it's inevitable once we understand the full nature of gravity
its science is a bridge to far
😯
Hahaha. Very nice. The truth is nice sometimes
"It’s not impossible; it’s just we don’t know how to do it."
True.
@Justin Croonenberghs
Not at all.
We’re talking about an artificial gravity.
Einstein would have been just fine, with it. So it wouldn’t be the end of Relativity at all. Relativity would still rule just business as usual.😁
It's also impossible.
@@cl114c0777498d People have been saying that since Ogg told Grogg that creating fire was impossible.
Not all animals are cows, because a cow is an animal. In the same line of thought something is not possible simply because we have not figured out how to make it happen.
@@ronald418 yeh historical ancient architecture all over the world that is unexplainable tells me it is possible & modern minds if anything cannot grasp something that ancient, more advanced civilization obviously could... go figure
I saw once some videos made by John Hutchinson who used a modified Tesla coil to move objects by tuning into their resonance frequency. It was pretty futuristic to see.
Yes there are videos of him lifting up objects. Some of them also seemed to partially liquify. Guy had his house packed full of test equipment, power supplies, etc!
Hutchinson is scam artist. His older stuff (ridiculous looking prop ray gun) was ridiculous.
I was feeling down today, but watching this has been uplifting.
"When a distinguished but elderly scientist states that something is possible, they are almost certainly right. When they state that something is impossible, they are very probably wrong. The only way to discovering the limits of the possible is to venture a little way past them into the impossible"
-Arthur C. Clarke
Arthur C Clarke was wron g on a lot of things. |you just don't hear about the stuff that was nonsense.
@@rogerphelps9939 we have to ignore the wrongness which surely is present and promote rightness, goodness and positivity and possibility...
"Momma said an an anti gravity fields are de de definitely fe fe feasible " - Bobby Boucher waterboys momma
@@philadelphiaslim4144
Lol
Don't forget about all dem teef but no toofbrush.
@@rogerphelps9939 We humans are far too ignorant, not to mention primitive, to say that anything is impossible. What we should say is, "We don't know how to do that -- yet". Today we can cut steel with beams of light from lasers. One hundred years ago that would have been called "impossible".
When the engineer seems more concerned about the "futuristic design" than the outrageous technical hurdles...
Yeah, that's a red flag that he hasn't got squash.
"anti gravity' is returning a region of space back to the conditions it has, far from any natural gravity source. Gravity acceleration is 32.2 feet per second^2 when near Earth but far enough out in space and gravity acceleration is negligible.
The failure of common physics is - lack of awareness that the conditions of space are change-able. It is 100% possible to restore the space on the underside, and in the immediate vicinity of, a vehicle - to the same conditions space has in open space far-removed from any natural gravity source.
ANALOGY: Let's call gravity 'hot space' and the space far removed from any natural gravity source 'cold space'. (I'm only using 'hot' and 'cold' because they're familiar ideas.)
'Hot' space accelerates a matter object at 32.2 feet per second^2. And 'cold' space has zero acceleration, compared to Earth gravity.
Move your vehicle into the vicinity of Earth. Convert the space on the underside, and in the immediate vicinity of, your vehicle to 'cold' space. You have
taken the 'low gravity' conditions of space and moved them to Earth. You have neutralized gravity.
Very few people can manage the intellectual hurdle that space has 'conditions' that can be modified.
Einstein in 1915 pointed out 'gravity bends light.' 'Bending' light means refraction. Gravity changes the refractive index of space. HOW? By altering the electric permittivity, magnetic permeability, of space. Those two 'conditions of space' are used to calculate the refractive index.
.
@Greg Chase Well first the acceleration of gravity varies by the mass if the body. On the moon the acceleration is 1/6th what it is on earth. So it is certainly variable but that variation is based on an object's mass not variations in the way gravity works. That's how we've been able to accurately determine how to use the gravity of planets like Jupiter to help accelerate satellites we've sent into the deeper recesses of the solar system.
The claim seems to be based on a premise that physics somehow is (or can be maybe) different elsewhere in the universe than our measurements show it to be here. That's extremely speculative and to my knowledge there's no objective evidence that it's possible.
Light bends because gravity warps space-time, it has nothing to do with "electricity," this has also been confirmed multiple times. Gravity is the weakest of known forces but it's ubiquitous, anywhere there are celestial bodies there's gravity to some degree. Areas of very empty space likely do have little gravity, but then there's still the push of "dark energy" that seems to permeate the cosmos, enlarging these voids in those instances.
Honestly I'm not quite sure what conclusion you're heading for there but if it's an "electric universe" well... you've got a lot of high level opposition to that premise. Like the vast majority of practicing astrophysicists and cosmologists. But as I usually say, make your observations, write your paper, and publish, my friend. Let the chips fall. I readily admit TH-cam is the weakest of all journals of peer review. ;-)
@@justaguy6100 A small team of us (elec engr and physics) work at artificial gravity devices. Publishing is out of the question. We will never commercialize or publicize the work due to fusion-enabling.
If the tokamak or any 'hot fusion' reactor - (none of which are able to reach "break even" energy output due to relying on electromagnetic confinement) -
- if they were retrofitted with artificial gravity containment they would achieve breakeven-plus, self-sustaining fusion output and disrupt the global energy ecosystem.
The Sun and stars in general require hydrogen and a gravity field. Gravity fuses hydrogen into helium.
Hydrogen is the most abundant element in the universe so there is no money in gravity-containment fusion.
Publishing is out of the question. We will never commercialize or publicize the work due to fusion-enabling.
@@Greg_Chase Well good luck. Once you finally make some kind of breakthrough that means you're not worried about too many people knowing your methods maybe then you'll publish something. I'm pretty sure sharing knowledge would enable breakthroughs much faster.
To weigh or not to weigh?
Love this mini series !!!
I had a good giggle there. Right at the end of the video, they mention they two things you need to understand it.
BBC should interview Glenn "Tony" Robertson who worked for NASA on this research, get the full story of what went on there...
This kind of fluffery is typical of the BBC, though. Bring it up, Entertain it, then trash it. Like they did with Shawyer's EM Drive. Don't mention workable alternatives. The fact is Antigravity, in addition to making warp drive possible, would also level the playing field putting landlocked nations on par with nations that have natural harbors. British power and hegemony always relied on maritime, naval control of chokepoints. This is why the British have stymied US cooperation with Russia, going all the way back to Lincoln and Czar Alexander II's attempt to build a trans-siberian railroad. It would undercut Britain's monopoly. It is the reason why Kennedy was killed, because the Deep State is controlled by Malthusianists who believe the Limits To Growth bullshit paradigm that is anti-civilizational, and Kennedy wanted to work with Russia and other nations. It is why British aristocrats funded Karl Marx, to bring about a revolution that would set Russia back and separate it from the West. It is behind the current propaganda against Russia and China, who want to build a Silk Road linking eurasia and other countries together, which would overcome the Limits To Growth. Bankers, City of London, DAVOS, etc all hate that because it undercuts their monopoly on power. It is also the same reason why Establishment scientists always try to rain on the parade or throw a wet blanket on notions of Antigravity and Warp Drive. Because they are believers in Closed System Dynamics, controlling scarce resources in the Limits to Growth. Hamiltonian/Leibnitz-ean Human Creativity paradigms are all about Open Systems, which Lincoln, FDR, and Kennedy all shared. That's why they all died while in office.
Not A Space Agency is Disney and CGI, everything has been done before, there is nothing new under the sun.
@@xavierlopes9204 No one can even know what the point of this comment even is. It makes no sense.
@@twinpeaksfanclub5493 you had me until you put your little piece in about China then you lost me entirely. Enjoy your +5 social credits wumao
@@DnBastard I never said I support China's social credit system, nor do I say I support their other authoritarian control measures, and nor do I endorse China's racism, which it DOES have, unfortunately. You're going to find that every system is a mixed bag of goods, containing some good and some bad. And a lesser or greater of two evils, in one area or another. China may be the greater of two evils in one area, for example, while also being the lesser of two evils along another axis or dimension of comparison. It depends on which point of reference you are using. What I am saying is the BRIC nations are choosing to develop infrastructure and connectivity to each other to build an alternative. Like, what about all the developments in soil regeneration technology, new battery technology, and Thorium that are happening in places like the UAE as well as China? What about the Russian work on Antigravity? I got called a sexist for endorsing the scientific progress and wealth of the UAE by a leftist woman, when I described how Congo could become like the UAE in the dimension of wealth and infrastructure development. But I never said I endorsed the UAE or Saudi Arabia's policies toward women. I was merely comparing ALONG ONE DIMENSION (the dimension of being able to use your countrie's natural resources to put wealth back into the development of your country, and not have it siphoned out elsewhere to benefit imperial powers while your people remain poor.) Same thing here: Why can't we look at and imitate the good things China is doing while discarding the bad? It doesn't have to be: X country does Y things bad therefore EVERYTHING about X country is bad. That's throwing the baby out with the bathwater. I mean, why is Soros now not welcome in China? Why is his affiliated organizations, like the NED, who have been involved in vicious destabilizing color revolutions undermining countries around the world, not welcome there?
The tic tac UAP encountered by commander Fraver sure does show that anti gravity transportation is very possible.
I think it’s already been done. Hard to put it to use though without putting nearly every business on earth out of business.
"Hard to put it to use though without putting nearly every business on earth out of business."
Bullshit claim. Making life easier and more convenient makes business MORE LIKELY.
You believe that the inventions of the steam engine and cellphones and computers "put all businesses out of business" because they made things easier for those businesses. That contradicts the OBVIOUS REALITY we see of the MASSIVE WORLD ECONOMY of 8 billion persons today in 2022 compared to 1000 years ago.
There has been research done in the US in this field more recently, even to the point that patents were awarded. One researcher, a Chinese national, working in the US, has even fled back to China taking what she learned with her. It may be that antigravity technology is more plausible, and closer than we think. After all is said and done, gravity is actually a fairly weak force (we routinely defeat it using magnetism).
Obviously, the US does not want the new tech because they have their own. Can’t wait till we can ALL work together on this and get to the business of finding new worlds for all. Everyone needs to loosen up and use the tech for the common good. Not to destroy.
I think a good pilot project for researchers to test their theories derived from anti-gravity research on a human-scale level, is to re-iterate the technology in what we normally in science fiction is common as 'hoverboards'. Also, the USGS conducts extensive research within geomangetism and magnetic anomaly, which I think could be incredible useful to dig even deeper into this unknown field of science.
@@feedyourhead7464 Right the US through private industry been having the technology since the 70s when they made a breakthrough with the tech… which came from WW2 the Germans were working on the technology, but didn’t finish it… Hans Kammler gave america what they started on along with night-vision advanced guidance systems etc… putting america 30 years ahead of the soviets…. Here is a good book about the subject (The SS GENERAL AND DIE GLOCKE).
@@feedyourhead7464 No, it's all bunk. I can assure you, along with every expert on General Relativity, that any claim of antigravity is pure bullshit.
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, and there is...as usual...NONE whatsoever. At least one them should have been able to explain the mechanism with which they manage to alter the gravitational field. Oh man there are like 1000 ways to debunk any AG device.Those small objects floating in a chamber are being influenced by magnetism. Every element has a paramagnetic and diamagetic strength, and with sufficient magnetic field strength you can make almost anything float. It costs a humongous amount of energy and the range is tiny.
That's why I think the Tic-Tac UFO incident is of importance, since a military fleet was observing them. Aliens or not, this was no farmer seeing something, this was a Naval fleet observing anti-gravity and high velocities and accelerations. It really gives you "hope" that there might be something there that can overcome gravity as we speak., and that was 2004.
I believe it’s possible as it explains the movement in the recently disclosed tic-tac UFO incidents.
The DIELECTRIC VORTEX Technology by Ronald Frederick Sykes just G it
Agreed!
The DIELECTRIC VORTEX Technology by Ronald Frederick Sykes just G it
@@ronsykes5035 ball lightning. The sapphire project or Martin fliechman memorial project. As soon as they showed people laughing at the idea I knew it was gonna be part nothing to see here hit peice. BBC all over.
There was some military dude who said in an interview that the US military had ‘cracked gravity’ - then went on to propose a vehicle design along with a former Lockheed Martin head honcho - They talked about beamed propulsion and space time - their vehicle render had a circle in the base… Who knows what came of all that but I have no doubt the powers that be have some kind of tech that we’re not adult enough to have shared with us… Plenty of tales from Afghanistan vets and the black triangles that made no sound and hovered around them… 🤷🏾♂️
Perception is everything. Instead of thinking of it as anti-gravity, look at it as pro-gravity. In other words, instead of trying to cancel gravity, all you need to do is learn how to create gravity. The force of gravity depends on displacement of space. Space is not just an empty void. Space has its own properties and dynamics. When space is displaced by mass or other means, the force of gravity is space trying to close the hole created by the substance which is caused the displacement. If the displacement is caused by a large mass of matter, like a planet, the space which is displaced still exists, but now it is outside of its normal place. There is now a condensed ripple in space, occupying the area on the outside of the matter that has displaced it. The magnitude of the force of gravity depends on how large the mass is, and how dense it is. The ripple in space, of the displaced space, is where gravity exists. If the density of the matter is high, like a black hole, the ripple in space will be more dense also, and the force of the push to close back in on itself will likewise be stronger. So, we need to create technology that will displace space as completely as possible. And be able to project the displacement in the direction the vehicle needs to travel. I may be wrong, but I don't think G-forces are applicable when the force of gravity is causing the acceleration and maneuvering.
Very well said
That technology exists and its called UAP. Its using energy to displace space not mass and that technology has been around since the end of WW2. But its being blamed on "aliens" - Which means the subject has turned into one of ridicule. It would kill the oil industry for sure. UAP use a gravitational bubble around it and it slips/slides through the atmosphere. There are no gforces and it does not disturb the air so there will not be a sonic boom. When you bend gravity you bend time so inside the UAP craft time speeds up - What I don't know is what they see looking out the windows of the craft. Time might slow down. And size does not matter what's the gravitational field is turned on so crafts a mile wide can fly but its not flying like a plane. The bubble that surrounds the craft repels Earths atmosphere and even water. So these crafts are trans-medium. The crafts "fall" in any direction and are basically being pulled. Its crazy technology I hope we get to see it one day - Its quantum physics. Just imagine a quantum particle except a big UAP the size of a plane or a large football field.
Have you considered that matter is eddied spacetime?
Wrong
You've done it! Congrads. You win the coveted antigravity award.
i love that this amazing thing immediately gets brought to it is a powerful weapon.
If we can not understand gravity with our laws of physics, we may have to rethink them. Maybe if we allow for some sort of aether, we will find out that gravity is like a soundwave. It may be no force at all. Instead it's a compression of the medium we currently think does not exist.
Cannot ...
Gravity is not a force. It's a wave of stretches and compressions proven by ingenious scientist at Ligo. So our understanding of gravity has been wrong for the past 400 years, and only Einstein got it right but he couldn't prove it until Ligo confirmed it in 2015. Now, can you imagine how much we still don't know about gravity?
Its fascinating how the design for project Greenglow is eerily similar to the design of the so called saucer shaped ufos we see.
A galaxy, this design, and a classic saucer look similar because they are all under the influence of a gravity well.
I thought the same
Would it be possible that these "flying saucers " people claim to see could be anti gravity experimental aircrafts?
It was in the same time
@@user-nw8jr1dk9p No. It can't be earth tech. Period. It could not in the 50's, it still can't. We would need thousands of years of advances in science and industry techniques to even be able to replicate one "saucer".
They had photos taken from us military secret base and next to a stealth bomber was exactly the same looking plane so i guess they made it afterall
We haven't even nailed down if gravity is a force yet. I am not holding my breathe this is happening anytime soon.
Of course not. Like the real scientist here said, something like this doesn't suddenly come out of nowhere (and certainly not by one guy that failed miserably to show he isn't full of shit). We will see signs of something like this coming a mile away (and by a team of people). Look at cold fusion, A.I.,
gravitational-wave observatories, medicine, etc. You just don't suddenly make a landmark invention from out your basement all of a sudden. This isn't a cartoon.
Gravity is not a force, any force you do feel is atomic (electromagnetic) repulsion between you and the floor. When your are not touching another object (in free fall) there is no force over you. Gravity essential just changes your direction when moving around other objects with mass due to time dilation being stronger on the side closer to the mass.
@@JabranImran in order to change your direction, that would be a force i think. We call gravity a general phenomena but once we do figure out how it works, im sure a force of some kind will be at the bottom of it. What we should be perplexed by, is what forced are. Its like we get content with being able to model forces mathematically, and summing them up as metaphysical particles. I think we may get content with discovering something other than reality if we continue down that path.
@@cecilmcintosh864 Force is a mathematical construct of mass multiplied by acceleration, think about what happens atomically when a mass changes speed or direction due to a rocket engine, the force is felt from the side with the engine, the force being atoms pushing against each other electromagnetically due to velocity/direction changing non uniformly (from all 3 dimensions). With gravity the direction change is uniform across the mass from all 3 dimensions so the atoms won’t push against each other (electromagnetically) except very minimally depending on how warped the gravity is.
I’m essentially just trying to simplify things; we take for granted abstract concepts (such as force or even position) to be simple and obvious because they are intuitive but the reality of these concepts are more abstract or different than our perception.
It's a wave.
I just hope whoever eventually figures it out will also figure out that we don't yet have the wisdom to use such technology responsibly
Like nuclear power
It’s been out for decades.Kept A security for A reason.
Well, you're in luck - the second part has already been figured out: turns out we are all monkeys wearing clothes.
@@Midwinter2 omg who taught us how to wear cloths.
Hense why we don't know or have it yet. Look at Russia and Ukraine. Look at the devastation it would cause.
We are just too barbaric and egotistical.
Eugene's Vacuum Disk is closer to the answer, but not quite right. The Vacuum is only needed to get it started, Anti Gravity literally then takes over and a field generated around the disc.
I think studying gravity at the quantum level is probably the best bet for now
Antigravity through control gravity also means time dilatation or time control since space and time are connected.
Control gravity would basically make "time travel" at an embryonic stage possible.
Yep. Importantly, this may only be acheivable using anti-matter.
only in the future tho.
@@d3r4g45 hey, I'm from the future, I can confirm there is no time travel.
Spot on. The air force has achieved this with their Arora projects. I know how to do it, it's just really expensive
In 1986 or 1987, I was sitting in a car rental office in Guatemala waiting for my rental. I started thumbing through a business magazine and I came across a short article that reported an experiment where a superconductor was put in some kind of environment that made it spin and they observed a 10% decrease in gravity.
For my point of view reason for such illegal activities is that this technology is extremely dangerous, much more dangerous than nukes. Because you could use it to accelerate something to near lightspeed and than crush it to earth. This could even destroy whole planet with one hit.
But this is a holy grail of physics. I think all major powers have done research in this field.
Our understanding of gravity is limited. Once we know all particles involved and all the interactions/ equations it will be an easier task.
the recent UFO videos from US Air Force, seem to point out exactly this. WIth as much as going under water, almost instant acceleration and breaks.
I can't believe there are so few comments about this. As revealed by the US pentagon, antigravity craft are whizzing around earth all the time, we just don't know whose they are or how they work.
Look at mick wests work on trying to figure out what those craft might be
Yeah I just wonder if those crafts are actually ours or from out of this world
Love this, that's exactly right. This tech exists , it could very well be American. What are the odds? A high tech alien civilization probing us all the time, or humans finally manipulating gravity? Great comment
It's not just gravity, it is also inertia. Imagine how you would take a 90 degree angle (or a series of these) at Mach 5, 10, 20...? you'd get smashed...
An object approaching an intense gravitational field (like a Black Hole) experiences time-dilation, the object therefore appears relatively slower to an external observer.
An object approaching an intense anti-gravity field (like a UFO) experiences time-compression, the object appears relatively faster to an external observer.
A UFO is only making break-neck maneuvers relative to us. Inside the craft, they see us in slow motion, and those 'break-neck' maneuvers are actually trivial maneuvers to them.
My hypothesis is that gravity occurs when an object (like the Earth) absorbs spacetime; a spacetime vacuum, pulling in all forms of energy towards its center.
In contrast, I believe that anti-gravity is a spacetime emitter. A craft that increases it's anti-gravity field appears to shrink to an external observer, however, from the inside it actually assumes an increased volume. Space and time literally become compressed in an anti-gravity field.
As a science person, I could not say that antigravity is possible, or that it is impossible. But, also being somewhat a student of history, every great discovery is introduced with laughter. If someone would have predicted youtube 100 years ago, they would have been severely ridiculed.
Not saying that TH-cam is a great discovery, but you know what I mean.
This is like when they started playing with static electricity back in the 1600’s, which eventually evolved and changed the path of mankind. It took 100’s of years of experimenting with such an unusual, powerful and complex force.
Probqaly the worst video ive ever seen, so pointless
Why would the Elites allow the commoners to know such marvels? Considering they plan on wiping US out!
nah just you
@@randyross5630 You have a point,it was year 1995 when I read a book in which the author said only 2 billion peoples must be alive in our planet...The excess population must be disposed directly or by secretive,shrewed,subtle way- like food additives, in medicines,drugs also - via the baxinne was their latest weaponized population reducer....
@Roberto Vidal Garcia Try to read the 7.series comics of Dr.Alberto Rivera,an ex.jesuit priest undercover agent- I read it in year 1981..He exposed in great details how the planet earth is being runned behind the scene by religious-satan tandem...Like a giant tree,what their controlled media shown to 98% of world population - were all the front branches,twigs, leaves,etc- men and women who are just their obidient and trusted front.. The robust body,trunk of the tree which controlled said branches group- was never exposed,reported to the public...The same religion is himself also a front of satan- the Bible hell(2Peter 2:4= Greek word TARTAROS= temporary prison cell) was discoved in 1983 under Siberia,Russia with depth of 17kms plus,not in Kola Peninsula which was only 12kms plus deep....
To control gravity you need to control time and space. We haven't figured out a way to influence either of those properties besides going super fast to travel forward through time faster than a stationary observer and to have a giant blob of mass like a planet which warps time around it to create the effect of gravity. So we're not creating our own gravity until we actually understand the fundamentals of what we're dealing with. We're not even close.
seeing we have very little concrete comprehension on the ideas of time, space and gravity... I think your answer is a little presumptuous.
I think you have it a little backwards. To control spacetime, you need to control gravity.
@@passivehouseaustralia4406 yeah I assumed so, but that only further solidifies my point which is we're not even close to controlling gravity
Ciri can do it :)
@@slavicmax8682 "we're not even close to controlling gravity"
That you know of.
You could have spoke about Clovis Jacinto de Matos experiments at ESA as it seems he have observed pretty curious electrogravitomagnetism effects that are far superior than the "noise" detected by instruments...
There was an antigravity U.S. patent. IIRC, it used the gravitational component with Maxwell's Equations. It was hand wavy.
There was follow up work using super-conductors by others which claimed extremely high field strengths. Not sure if anyone duplicated those experiments creating the gravity version of AC waves which act like magnetic fields.
Since I'm a firm believer we're being visited, of course I believe artificial gravity is possible. Compressing spacetime is the only practical way to get from there to here, (or from here to there). And the only way to do that is through the creation of artificial gravity. Someone's figured it out.
"Compressing spacetime is the only practical way to get there to here" only if you have a short life. Even a billion years is nothing on the cosmic scale. In each cycle of the universe, the eons live 10^10^10^500 years
visited by who? your street neigbours?
3 things
1 my neighbor was a retired test pilot
2 a lying 🤥 fat drunk
3 whenever he took a dump you could always count on it drifting out his bathroom 🚽 window and floating into
My backyard where I’d be entertaining friends and family
What this all means I don’t know 🤷♂️
Maybe that if a fart 💨 can make its way out his ass and into the mouths 👄 and noses 👃 of friends than anything is possible
Just a thought 💭
@@zamolxezamolxe8131 LOL..^^^
@@zamolxezamolxe8131 by some non human intelligence, as appears in the 2004 Nimitz encounter
Remember kids, nothing is impossible.
Really.. I mean even universe?
Bob lazars story/observations about element 115 on the periodic table is very insightful about antigravity propulsion
Bob Lazar was absolutely correct on everything he has said on this issue & the evidence is overwhelming!
Correct! The issue is, we are having a hard time synthesizing element 115 with the correct isotope arrangement.
The biggest challenge at present is that we still don't know what gravity *is*. Yes, we know the effect it has on things, but we're still clueless as to precisely how it works. And until we crack that mystery, trying to overcome and/or manipulate gravity is basically a "throw stuff against the wall and see what sticks" approach.
Gravity is simple the curviture of space time. gravity is not a force.
The short answer is yes! We have seen ships that ignore gravity and liquids while moving at great speeds. We have video evidence of these craft, eye witness and interviews of folks who have seen these craft in action!
The short answer is no! You haven't seen video evidence of any anti-gravity craft, you've seen blurry pictures most of which are easily explained and some of which the only honest answer is 'we don't know'. As for interviews there are many terms for people who believe everything they want to hear. Naïve, gullible and easily led are a few that spring immediately to mind 😊
Victor grebennikov anti gravity technology
Honestly, scientists can't let crazy ideas without testing. Specially when it's about a force we barely understand like gravity.
I know this thing doesn't exist. But I'm sure that's the same thing that rattled my home as it hovered 30ft above my head for 30 seconds. Then shot off with a very distinctive Zumm/Vumm noise in May 2021!
I agree entirely. Just matter of time. I'm currently typing this on a small smart phone here in Ireland and my message is potentially going to be seen almost instantly all over the world. Tell 5hst to someone from 500 years ago and they just couldn't imagine . oh and you'd need a time machine!
You are doing that thanks to eletromagnetism (eletric signals) and quantum physicists(transistors).
Before being able to control gravity, we need to understand gravity at the quantum level. A thing that we cant do right now. Thats why this idea is in fact crazy and ilarious. We need to understand the theory behind before being able to create complex machines.
@@jzargowinterhold1942
you don't control, gravity...
you use it...
@@gordonpeacman2126 we cant because we dont know how to do it. But it may be possible with a new theory of quantum gravity
@@jzargowinterhold1942
you don't want to control gravity, you want it to work for you ...
Repel an Attract ...2 things you need to concentrate on..
Now if you can invent a Electromagnetic coil, that can do those 2things you will be famous...
Of course it won't be of any use ...
Not until the Oil runs out ...it may be then...
@@jzargowinterhold1942 we are understanding gravity at the quantum level thats what physicists all over the world are working on rn we have even encountered warp bubbles on the quantum level while studying the structure of casimir cavities darpa is literally funding this research
Star trek Enterprise created a gravity well focal point in front of the ship, into which it fell.
That's artificial gravity warp drive.
Waaaaay ahead of the state of the art.
4:08 ‘Breakthough’. Good job.
My grandfather was born in a time where's a steam engine was cutting edge science and cars where still 14 years away from being invented.
I get home from work in a car that drives itself!
I postulate that we ( the US) already have this tech ( triangle shaped craft) but keeping it VERY, VERY and VERY SECRET. As the Russian said " it could be used as a weapon"
While I can't imagine how it could be used as a weapon, other than being the transport of a weapon. But just because I can't imagine it. Doesn't mean somebody can't.. and that's probably the reason it's use is very secret
Well I guess if you can aim the antigravity to a specific spot, you could break up buildings, planes, ships, etc by essentially pulling on them.
You could just use a gravity control drive to accelerate some mass to near light speed and aim it to specified target on earth. Explosion would be much more powerful than fusion bomb. If enough mass is accelerated and enough percentage of lightspeed is gained planet or even a star could be obliterated. This concept is called "relativistic rocket".
@@tukatsinskyweight of payload the craft itself would prob not be nearly as important, and good luck hitting a ship with anti gravity that can move at those speeds lol
Humans have a habit of finding ways to do things that were once thought impossible. It’s almost like if we can imagine something we’ll eventually figure out how to achieve it. Impossible is a concept we have a habit of breaking. Ask Copernicus whether we will ever travel to the moon…
Applying antigravity technology to the moving industry would be a game changer. Moving heavy objects for a living takes a huge toll on the body. If we could eliminate the need for that, that would be extremely useful.
Hydraulics and robots 🤨 we don't need antigravity
Oh thank god we need more advancement in the moving company
@@casetteplayer Anti-gravity isn't real and isn't even theoretically possible. The technology you should hope for are super conductors as in the technology that makes trains levitate.
If there is some serious progress with manipulating gravity, what are the chances that the general public is going to be let in on it?
He literally said it at the end control time you control space hence you control gravity!
They aren't fundamental, so it is possible.
Based on my understanding of Science,
To control gravity, one must control mass.
To control mass one, must control the atomic structure of atoms
To control atomic structure of atoms, one must control sub-atomic structure of protons, electrons, neutrons
To control sub-atomic structure , one must control the quantum structure of bosons, muons, quarks
To control quantum structure, one must identify the primary source of energy & its properties of big-bang . which is work in-progress.
Or perhaps we have a total misunderstanding of what gravity is. For example, it is commonly known now that gravity is mearly a gradient in time caused by the curvature of spacetime. Another set of steps would be,
To understand what time really is (is it a dimension, why do we travel in one direction, do anti-particles move backward in time?)
To Control gravity by changing this gradient (No idea how one would do that).
To do a lot of other steps.
I believe Time is the missing peice of the puzzle. If we can figure out how time really works such is done using the Quantum Theory of Time by Prof. Vaccaro, then perhaps we can build an intuition of gravity using this. Btw, this work on the QTT explains why we don't see gravitons, why we don't see an abundance of anti-particles and reproduces dynamical equations such as Schrodingers equation and even Lorentz invariance totally pheonologically using T-violation in a 4th dimension of space we call time. Otherwise, Time is equivilent to a spatial dimension in every way.
@@LMProduction Keep in mind, you don't actually have to understand something to utilize it. Electricity was used LONG before anyone even understood what an electron was.
It could be something else abstract such as controlling the Higgs field (which is currently understood by physics to be what gives particles their mass). It could also be something we don't even know about yet. We lack a quantum understanding of gravity anyway (as special relativity and quantum mechanics fail to go together harmoniously), so this probably needs to be solved first... somehow. String theory is one possible contender for now, but there is likely a far more complex reality out there.
There are 2 ways to make an object weightless.
One is to invent a process for reducing the mass to zero. But that would mean a tiny force can give it an infinite acceleration and velocity.
Once you reverse that process and give the object mass again, you would have created an enormous amount of kinetic energy, which violates the first law of thermodynamics.
So forget about zero mass.
The other one is to create a local, artificial gravitational field in which a mass accelerates in any chosen direction.
I don't see how this can be done without violating another law: conservation of momentum.
the only comment here ive read that actually hits a point on the head.
what about using some kind of reverse magnetic drive or propulsion to push away from earth like reversing polls on a magnet 🧲 in a tall shoot that would be particularly under ground and a bit above ground for enough ramp up speed ? just a thought .
We just recently learned how to measure gravity. Couple of decades and we will have this nailed.
I feel certain that gravity manipulation of some type is possible, but I'm skeptical about whether or not we'll be able to utilize it without enormous amounts of mass, energy, or difficult to obtain substances such as antimatter. Additionally, being able to manipulate gravity to some extent doesn't mean that we've necessarily come up with anything useful. If we come up with a device that can create a repulsive gravity effect but can't overcome its own weight, that really limits its use. It it requires a nuclear fusion reactor to lift a sheet of paper, that's not very useful. If it emits extreme heat, harmful radiation, or other negative effects, this makes it hard to implement. I think we should continue looking at ant-gravity devices, but not expect anything useful to crop up, especially not anytime soon.
Well i think so Nikola tesla said that frequency can do anything he almost took down his building by tuning a device to the frequency of the building what if u found the frequency of gravity?
Bob Lazar's original interview answers all those questions. I highly recommend
th-cam.com/video/Fqd6kdg_EaA/w-d-xo.html The Lazar Tapes
That's where you're wrong. That's like saying it's impossible to fry your eggs besides any other means than to enter a volcano.
Mike LastName, On the contrary, If you can't make an anti gravity repulsive force strong enough to lift a sheet of paper with a nuclear fusion reactor, then it not only proves that negative energy anti gravity exists, but in time, research and study, one can figure out shortcuts and a more efficient way to make it much stronger, in the future. A thrust equal to the weight of a sheet of paper is more than enough to make an interplanetary probe which is more efficient than today's ion thrusters. In no time, we would be making manned spacecraft and eventually a warp drive. I think you will find it interesting @Mike LastName that the thrust of a sheet of paper is the same idea I am writing in a paper of mine which argues in favor of spending a lot of money to make anti gravity in the laboratory, the brute force way. Use what ever energy is needed to make a detectible space warp, gravity or anti gravity. Once we make it, it will revolutionize space travel.
Without the discovery of a fundamental particle, the mythical "graviton" - which clearly doesn't exist - this is all a moo point as there's very likely no way to "control" or replicate gravity without a large mass, as that's what it is - the bending of spacetime around mass.
Oh, and "moo" point is correct, you know - it's like a cow's opinion, it doesn't matter.
it's Moo.
What you would essentially be doing is creating your own electro magnetic atmosphere like that of earth. Propulsion is light, which is made of particles.
@@justhuman3886 lol
I don't know that the graviton necessarily needs to be discovered before we can better manipulate gravity. Michael Faraday was pushing around electrons long before he had any clue that they existed.
@@gregsurles4199 Not entirely sure what you mean by that? If they had made a propolusion using some kind of anti-gravity, then no it wouldn't be using light. Also, photons are quanta of the EM field, not actually particles. That's a common misconseption, and even a good approximation for some applications.
"Have I been living with him for too long - or did that all just make sense"
The inventor Alexe Chekurkov has a Anti Gravity device , its a small model of a device that uses Anti Gravity it really does fly , if you all want to see that in action it is on youtube , plus the inventor Tesla has a drawing of a flying saucer that uses Anti Gravity, using gravity amplifiers to create lift .
A recent Action lab video "anti gravity wheel' certainly gives pause for thought if it's technically possible. Someone must understand the physics of spinning discs in a gravitational field, I've yet to comprehend what really is happening with them as the weight seems to change in some sense, dependent on its axis of orientation and other things .
Watch my latest...
We make space in car which is not earth in earth it's car
@@Waiting664all your base are belong to us
This technology already exists.
?
Could you explain?
Just not made by human hands
🤨how..
@@Vega004 We have had this technology since the Roswell crash of not sooner. This is how countries can have an actually "space force" that is feasible today as it requires power but not fuel. And, as Bar L implies below, it was not invented by humans. We have only managed to reverse engineer it over decades.
I hope we can figure it out, but I'm going to remain highly skeptical of any claim that we've done it at least until we figure out what gravity *is* beyond the definition relativity gives us.
At present, our understanding of generating gravity requires mass, and lots of gravity requires lots of mass.
The USS Nimitz encounter has proved that someone has created and implemented this technology. It’s just not us, not yet at least.
@@anthonyc5039 🤣
A theory of quantum gravity would help. Relativity gives us no easy path. Beyond using forms of exotic matter that, we can not say if it even exists. And there is a slight chance that we may mimic such exotic matter, but there are great doubts about it and even if we can, it may not be easy to do it on a practical level.
So anti gravity would require negative mass
@@user-jt6xh2ln9z That is the exotic matter indeed.
The first man made gravity drive vehicle was made by John Keely in 1885, The second device was made by Nikola Tesla in 1895, Then in 1943 in Germany the scientists made 3 different gravity drives and the best I found was the Honabu that was recorded flying accross Europe at speeds of 2,200km/h by US radar during the end of the war. Then in 1953 John Searl in England made many vehicles that were said to move at up to the speed of light. I am sure that many have been created since then but US secret services have been keepping a lid on the research since then.
Like a bowling ball on a mattress, it 'pulls' that which is behind it into the space it 'warps'. That's how aliens use 'anti-gravity'. They warp the space in any direction around the ship, and it 'pulls' (not pushes) the ship into that space. And promptly at that!
Great to see the BBC openly discuss such a taboo area of science... but research in to anti-gravity didn't start in the 80's. It started back in the 40's with the likes of T. T. Brown, and Viktor Schauberger. Why is nobody concerned with re-engineering and testing their experiments?
I made a gravity drive..it doesn't magically cancel or reverse gravity think of gravity as atomic weak force my lil box moves in any direction in anything like air, vacume of space or under water...the government has silent no air blowing aircraft because I figured it out so I'm positive they did..
@@sailingmohican2767 okay, whats is its source of energy? Does it exhaust any propellent? How fast can this lil box move?
@@FistOfBro it uses only electricity and no its a sealed box can be under pressure or in water or in the vacuum of space ..and the speed I believe Einstein was wrong and if you have a lil box 📦 with a electricity supply ( nuclear, solar) than it would keep a constant acceleration until the mechanical parts in it wear out and the acceleration is determined by the watts input and its mass at rest 😉not joking people are still believing Einstein was right and literally will beat you up if you argue or try something that proves him wrong ..its holding them back where I always thought since I understood light and mass and speed Einsteins theory made no sense to me..so I experimented and figured out how things work without the oppressive Einstein as a guide...seriously though I am just working on more money and a shop and equipment to build afull scale prototype .my lil box is tiny and can barely lift its self but it scales up exponentially so a bigger one will have more push in a lil car she moves pretty quickly and of course down twice as fast haha 😄 like I said gravity is related to atomic weak force ..so I kinda believe it is more a atomic force Making machine that pushes away from any type of matter so I made the opposite of atomic attraction...
People don't realize that space is not empty there is 1 hydrogen atom per every 3 cubic centimeters and I believe they will find less outside our heliosphere..but none the less I believe gravity is a type of atomic force and we all know Einstein was wrong about black holes, information moving faster than light he would get mad and call that one spooky action at a distance. Bahahaha witchcraft when called out ..instead of recognizing hmmm I might be wrong let's investigate. But no they just flunked the students doing that experiment lol ..and if you really believe gravity is a sheet woven of space and time that the earth sits on and shit orbits us because the sheet is sagged is funny because me as a small child pissed off my sience teacher by asking well umm why is there gravity on the top and bottom both?? A sheet we sitting on would mean everything in southern hemisphere would be smashed and reindeer would float in the north pole!!!! Lol it's insane that colleges force people to believe that 😂
@@FistOfBro oh and of course I'm not going to explain exactly how it works 🙃 but it's legit ufo type shit ,it's silent with sound proofing and actually when I tested it I put baby powder on the scale surface so it would slide easily and I didn't need it but it didn't blow or move like in a magnetic field or anything ..it does have a weird feeling in your hand like a intense vibration and I will say this frequency is a important factor in my invention..
@@sailingmohican2767 einstein referred to Quantum Entanglement as spooky action at a distance not wormholes- there is such a thing as the "einstein rosen bridge" from which the theory of wormholes was founded. the speed of light being a fixed speed barrier in the universe, is irrelevent for a craft which can travel interdimensionally. The existence of this form of travel does not imply einstein was wrong, or JC Maxwell for that matter, it only tells us there is more to the story of the physics around us.
We already know it's possible from all the UAPs that have been flying around our atmosphere and in our oceans for decades...if not much, much longer. So the technology exists, though it may still elude our grasp of science for a while yet.
They are following metamaterial with terahertz frequencies currently. Bismuth and magnesian layered atomically.
@@Broges_slots Yes, I saw that, too. We'll have to see if that leads anywhere, or ends up being a dead end because they still don't have all the pieces of the puzzle.
Anti gravity was controlled at about october 1954 . It's already done
Civilian scientists are not the only individuals working on this problem. Militaries are working on the same problem, and they don't share their results. They also don't necessarily have the same goals with respect to such a technology's application. Some people seem to forget that the development of the first atomic bomb was not public knowledge.
I thought I would regret wasting time watching this. I was right. It may be worthwhile (for certain people) as a cautionary tale-like a story about spending development dollars on perpetual motion or Chinese real estate.
I agree it’s not impossible. It just requires creating negative mass and enough of it to have enough force to counter earths gravitational pull.
Though, the creation of negative mass is not an easy task. Right now, the closest we have got to that is exploiting the Casimir effect, what I know of. And it is debatable if one should view the negative like energy state as a true negative energy. And if it is, can it be exploited for the purpose or will the setup itself cancel out any negative mass you manage to create.
To say not posible create antigravity is same to people in midle ages would say its not posible fly
@@tesodjukic4377 Well... It is a bit more complicated than that. And already in the Middle Ages there were people that dream on flying. Flying devices, if unsuccessful, dates back to before the middle ages. Though there is also some they where successful. Even if they could not work for manned flight.
There is a big difference here in that man had seen in nature things that flies, birds, insects, leaves. But we have not really seen any anti-gravity. I guess the closest thing is gravity waves. But is not really anti-gravity. Now, that does not mean it can not be. But a bit reason why a lot of people is sceptical is because we have not seen anything like it in nature or in our experiments.
So far, the only way we know to really bend spacetime is with the use of energy. Mainly in the very condensed form we call mass. But E=mc². Meaning that mass is just a form of energy. That is why we are talking about negative mass or energy. If this could be created, then you should have a pure anti-gravity effect. But we do not know. And we do not know if this can be created.
The laws of physics are not laws that can be broken. Their description of how reality works. And they can only be either correct or incorrect. We might have our theories wrong. But we do not know. We know however so far they have had practical results. So they at least partially right.
@@Cythil in 1000yrs evrything can happen things we can even imagine,example how would explosion of hydrogen bomb inflcenced man in yr.1021
If Cavendish was able to detect gravity over 200 years ago with his two massive balls, why hasn't there been more experiments since using mass to further detect or even influence gravity?
Yes, I believe eventually science will, in the future, understand the control, utilization and weaponry of gravitational control, much like the Wright Brothers and others came to understand the mechanics of lift on an airfoil. I also think gravity control will somehow involve research at CERN and understanding subatomic particles and the physics therein.
Gadzooks! ...that quantum gravity detector there at the end - sure looked like a flux capacitor.
We still don't yet even know what gravity really is so how can we control it? Until we unify our physics theories, we have no hope. This is a pie we cannot get into the sky.
@Justin Croonenberghs I agree with you on the point of gravity being a result of space/time distortion/fluctuation. I think gravity is a global term for a number of factors that we have yet to discover and fully understand.
It really involves bringing the quantum world into the macroscopic world. In simpler terms, how much can we scale up the quantum level of reality to the macroscopic?
Have you read Ball Lightning by Liu Cixin? It is pretty much this. But Macrocosmic Electron's already being present (and invisible)..
The fact that the best they could come up with was an artist impression with a green glow as their original concept is very telling.
Hey! - That guy wrote a book called Project GreenGlow. It was really good sadly it was short on technical details.
I would think blocking the effect of gravity would be easier than trying to create gravity or anti gravity. Think about it... if you could just temporarly block the gravity created by earths mass around an object you can achieve lift from the earths natural rotation.
That's HG Well's Cavorite as described in his novel 'The First Men In the Moon'.
Check out the motion picture adaptation!
Well do not go too far along that… do you want trouble or just looking for info that will bring you big problems.
Well the problem is that Gravity is not a physical "field" like magnetic or electric fields. It's merely an illusion and not a force.
@@shahabazkhan1Gravity is not a force but it is both a field and a fundamental interaction.
According to my feeble understanding gravity is caused by mass. You need something with negative mass which if found could help us invent the warp drive.
Antimatter is a real thing and 'might' create antigravity. We don't know for sure as we cant create antimatter in large enough quantities to find out.
Or we need to create negative mass somehow.. If it doesn't exist
What we refer to as "The Strong Nuclear Force" is essentially the same force as gravity just trillions of times stronger. You need access this wavelength and amplify it in order to distort gravity to a useful level we could use for time/travel .
The way our energy fields work on earth you have to create anticharge to get the effect you're wanting. Spinning electromagnetic fields fast and causing massive shifts in eddy currents is what will cause an energy antigravity effect because they will build up an extreme positive anticharge compared to the rest of the planet. It's not too difficult once you understand, it just takes alot of power and money.
Heres one concept: You have two points (A and B). Point A is attracted(pulled) to a point B where point A is rigid to a body of the vehicle and the point B is independently floating of the body. By controlling the position of the point B controls the direction in which to point A is pulled. However, for this theory to be feasible, these two points must not be affected by "gravity".
Trying to overcome gravity or rather create gravity controlling device, it would had to be stronger that the gravity field this device is in. This gravity based device would encounter many problems like the power requirement, plus out in space, there are objects that create gravity fields beyond anything possible. This would render such device impractical.
We need to look at different possibilities of objects being attracted to each other that dont involve "gravity". magnetism, quantum physics or even some other exotic "thinks" that we dont even know about yet.
Wouldn't an anti gravity device once turned on be suspended in the air and see the planet move away from it at whatever speed the earth moves at?
it would still be in its local frame of reference so no
If we've got it we sure as hell aren't going to tell you about it and we sure as hell aren't going to tell anybody that we've got it.
Whistle blowers say repeatedly it has been done using 2 - 3 Terahertz electromagnetic field around a craft that blocks subatomic particle entanglement that normally carries the mass or weight of every local atom so if you block the communications your craft is weightless and has zero mass or weight and a match head rocket engine can power a craft like a bullet fired out of a gun !
Whenever an old professor says it cannot be done, you can be sure it will
I'll tell you right now it's been perfected very well. Its been in use for many years now. Its been flying around for a long time. It's sad really, the people that died in the shuttle didn't have to.
your 100%. correct flying around in rockets is absolute b.s.....like nuclear weapons ...both obsolete...
yes they never needed to die ...
the U.S. have been back an forth to the Moon, during, an after the War ...
Be app 10k ppl on their Moon base ...
U.S. have had the tech since, 1936...
@@gordonpeacman2126 you are so right. Most people just have no idea.
Canada has 2sightings per day ...
Roosevelt an the Allies built 500,, Foo Fighters in a 300sq mile hidden valley in B.C. that's their H.Q. on Earth, my guess there's a no fly zone over it, or it's cloaked, the Alberta town of St Paul built a 130ton UFO landing pad 45yrs ago..
lol... Roswell has nothing on B.C....
Ning Li paper on “Gravity Modification”. It worked. She got a nice grant but died a few years back.
Ac gravity can influence Dc gravity.
Don't tell the laughing guy in the hat that we've already sent a rocket to the moon...😂
If you could design an engine that converts centrifugal torsion force into forward motion, then theoritically, as the mass of the flywheels increases due to the effects of acceleration, the speed would be increased by the same ratio of effeciency between the energy required to rotate the flywheels, to the net forward motion or see it this way, the go faster, the faster you can go. You dont need super conducters, you be suprised at how plain water acts when you rotate it beyond 100 rpm.
Sandy Kidd's device as a notable example?
@@jerardogonzalez007 hey thanks ill check it out...but no, Ive been trying to figure out a drive system, that was what Ive visualized so far. Im kind of a savant for building stuff. Kind of like having a CAD program in my head. Since my design converts torsion force into linear acceleration, as a by product of this method of propulsion, I also realised that as it accelerates the fly wheels would increase in mass. Im still trying to visualize the bearing assembly. Not so much a resistance or drag problem as much of a cold welding issue. Then theres a possiblity of Dzhanibekov effect on the nacelles. My mental CAD program cant visualize beyond what I dont understand. I have a limited education. Have you ever seen a person with a spining bike wheel on a rotaing chair move by tilting the make shift gyroscope? Something like that. Just extremely more complex. Essencially a ship that uses carefully placed gyros to generate thrust in a forward motion. It works off electricity. I also design a more primative design engine that uses water electrolysis to use HHO gas as fuel. The combustion chamber re captures the water, which it s the by product of HHO combustion and recycles it back to the tank. Super efficient and uses water, which we need anyways. The water would be kept around the ships hull. To shield from radiation and protect from impacts, freezing and self sealing damage. I know, im wierd.
@@apocraphontripp4728 here's a video that illustrates something along the lines of what I think you're trying to convey th-cam.com/video/zo8PT4oIDIY/w-d-xo.html
Gyroscopic precession is the key aspect in redirecting angular momentum perpendicularly.
@@jerardogonzalez007 Wow thank you so much. Yes similar. The idea is that all the rotating assemblies are in free fall, therfore weigh nothing until they all face forward and their mass is aimed in one direction. Giving a bump forward. You can go with either a higher rotational speed or have a larger rotational mass. Both work, both have thier engineering issues. Timing them is not an issue, as the same principal that gets swinging pendulums that are out of sync, to get in sync is at play. Not a warp drive, so no instant FTL, but it can give you 1 g of constant acceleration. Id call this video more of a momentum drive, i played with it in my head, but could keep the ship from flipping around in zero gs from the Dzhanibekov effect. So I abandoned it for a flywheel based system. Similar concept, just like a V 8 and a rotary are similar, but go about different ways of doing the same thing. See it this way, imagine the pendulums in this video were made of tungsten and encapsulated in an aluminum wheel. So now instead of the electric motor being inside the shaft, you could use an array of them to rotate the wheel, kind of like the stargate in SG1 spins. The wheels all spin at different speeds but all the weights are timmed to meets at the front point. Id build a prototype, but right now working on a rail gun, not a rail gun, but a torsion gun. Its just stupid to use the weakest force, electromagnetism to grab and launch a projectile. Or see it this way, never seen an arc welder accidentally spit out a piece of metal at near bullet speed, but ive had a die grinder do it. That is the principal behind my torision gun. Hey, its been cool talking to you, let me know if your ever in the Orlando area. A new friend Joe.
@@jerardogonzalez007 th-cam.com/video/n_6p-1J551Y/w-d-xo.html
This is more like what im going for. Imagine an array of these, a nacelle of them, arranged to target all there forward momentum in one direction.
Im a medical scientist with many published works. Im from Pakistan. The saddest part in this video was scientists laughing at the hypothesis. Have we learnt nothing from scientific history?
+ Romans 10:9-10 "That if you confess with your mouth, "Jesus is Lord," and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved. For it is with your heart that you believe and are justified, and it is with your mouth that you confess and are saved."
Are you saved by Jesus Christ, my friends?
"THIS IS THE HEART OF THE BRITISH SECRET DEFENSE SCIENCE SYSTEM"
Goes ahead to Show him everything in their secret.
I've read Bob Lazar's recollection of working on UFO's at area 51 and he said these crafts had the ability to create its own gravity through some generators and amplifiers. He recalled these crafts being other worldly in their design with no electric wiring, no on/off buttons, it didn't generate heat at all, and for some reason there were no right angles in the machinery. He said the abilities of this craft was due to element 115 which was recently proven to exist, and as time has continued Bob Lazar's story only gains credibility, so it's not even a matter of if anti-gravity is possible because we've KNOWN it's possible. Scientists just haven't figured out how to reverse engineer these UFO's, or maybe they do and they just don't want to release it to the public.
Do you honestly believe ufos come from aliens? Dude Nazis made them. Plus the ancients had tech. The only reason they're increasing is because they're making more ufos now. Not because of aliens.
@@Allyourheroswenttohell " element 115 which was recently proven to exist" Yes, but extremly instable and no detectable speciel feature. Bob Lazar does not gain any new support.
@@1fairi idc about any of that. There are literally ufos. You honestly believe the government pushing an alien agenda doesn't know how they work? Lmao.
@@1fairi The media is fake.
@@Allyourheroswenttohell No,it is impossible to understand. We do not have unified theory for phisics.And according the our understanding, the mehacics of UFo is totally impossible. We are only caveman compared to an interstellar civilisation.
Gravity is the result of the slowed down flow of objects through time space near large masses generating gravity.. thus to make anti-gravity you'll need to make time flow backwards as well, and that's what makes sense even more. Untill and unless we can make something which has negative mass, manipulating time would be the way to control gravity which is a dream yet to come true..
you do not need to reverse time to have anti gravity you do however need to manipulate the space time continuum thats not time travel its slowing or speeding up time who tf is teaching you people physics and gravity is the interaction of the spacetime continuum and mass has nothing to do with the flow but rather vibration of energy as energy makes up atoms and atoms makes up mass
I'm old and 108kgs. Every time I get out of my chair, it feels like I'm defying gravity. 😊
The net thrust observed on asymmetric and symmetric capacitors is observed in a vacuum and in oil baths, telling us that there is more than just 'ion wind' at work, so perhaps that's a good route to explore. Honda showed an apparent 3% weight loss in an experiment using a symmetric capacitor in an oil bath, Gravitec, a NASA contractor, showed that the effect worked in a vacuum. Others have succesfully repeated both experiments.
SUBLIMATION. When the voltage is high enough and the work function of the electrode is exceeded, the material *_of the electrode_* provides the 'working fluid' - the source for a plasma - in the evacuated testing of asymmetric capacitor devices. "There's no air in the evacuated chamber but there is still thrust" the sublimated electrode, which is converted to gaseous form, replaces the missing air molecules in the evacuated chamber.
*Sublimation is the transition of a substance directly from the solid to the gas state* (wiki)
Asymmetric capacitors rely on very high (10Kv, 20kv, etc) voltages applied across the electrodes. Those electrodes fail over time due to the erosion from sublimation.
"Asymmetric capacitor thrust is possible in vacuum" yes due to sublimation of the electrode.
A gradient static electric field is NOT going to produce artificial gravity or alteration of gravity. The constituents of the Vacuum (space, the background field, etc) consist of electric AND magnetic parts. We know that from the alternating electric and magnetic fields in electromagnetic waves that propagate through space.
We know that from Vacuum Permittivity, and from Vacuum Permeability (see wiki for articles on those).
You must work on both the electric and magnetic portions of the constituents of the Vacuum to control gravity. You can't only do the magnetic part, or only do the electric part.
Thanks, informative and educational. I can't imagine sublimation having a strong effect in an oil bath, what are your thoughts on that ?>@@Greg_Chase
@@GaryMcKinnonUFO Can the oil bath be ionized? Yes.
A.C. rely on a space charge of ions. Ionizing the oil bath constituents (including impurities) is feasible.
The 'ion wind' is a secondary effect. The primary enabler of motion is the space charge of ions created by the high voltage.
The ion wind DOES NOT create the lift. I could explain if you like.
Yes i think there is more than just ion wind, i've been reading papers and the experiments of others on this effect since 2007. I meant do you think sublimation could be the cause of the thrust in an oil bath. I bought some copper calcium titanate to test as a dielectric, i've had results with glass and also nitrile rubber so time to try something with a massive K. If sintered properly the K can be ridiculously large, up to 280,000 i read in one article.@@Greg_Chase
If it can be done, even reducing gravity effect some, think of the fuel savings on airplanes and rockets. Think of raising a space shuttle without all the huge tank and side boosters, just enough rocket to get into orbital speed to chase down the ISS. Enough rocket to slow down on re-entry and settle gently to earth.
Its been done since the 1980s lol the government just wont release it to the public
Well maybe, or maybe manipulating gravity might be really energy intensive and actually consume more fuel.
Now, we are really close to functional fusion energy. If we used that, even if it was an energy intensive process, it wouldn't be a problem.
@@Mephilis78 I'd love to see viable fusion energy. I'm not a green but I do know at some point fossil fuels will run out. It may be in 3000 years but it will happen. I'd like to think we can advance beyond them in a practical manner before then.
My own theories about gravity are probably wrong but I consider it a force similar to radio waves. if you put some dust in a bucket on the space shuttle the dust will clump together on its own. This is gravity in action. Whatever that force is, there may be a way to block or redirect it. Science hasn't come up with any better explanations. No one really knows how it works so my theories are as good as anyones.
@@Dannysoutherner me too. I also hope we have the chance to terraform some other planet before 3000 years too lol. Here's hoping.
I honestly think for us to progress that far technologically, we'll probably have to tear down all current political systems and replace them with entirely new ideas. Like literally not capitalism or communism. (From a historical point of view, even monarchy is more successful) They both are failures, and they both stifle any innovation that isn't directly beneficial to the power holders.
This all depends on what gravity actually is. We can meansure it in all kinds of ways, but - for example - the Electric Universe community have totally different ideas as to what causes the effect we call gravity.
Mass…….. mass causes gravity…. No idea there. It’s a fact.
@@nkyryry mass creating distortions in space time its not just mass its the interaction of all three
@@thesasquatch3032 well true. But with nothing to distort space time. There’s no distortion.
@@nkyryry It only seems to be a fact if you accept the given narrative. If the given narrative is wrong, any conclusions based on it are wrong. Just because the 'loudest' researchers put together a narrative doesn't make it the truth. Materialists and 'scientism-ists' deny supernatural dimensions, which in effect means denying quantum theory.
gravity is just the property of mass...next... what is mass...?@@nkyryry
Measurements have shown that the earth's center of gravity is about 6000km up in the air, which actually makes it a pushing force and not a pulling force.
Gravity propulsion, Tic tac vehicles, already exists. Stargate. What I want to know about is time. The ones who know, I believe are frantically trying to find why they cannot see past a certain time and are trying to change it.
We mock what we don’t understand ✨💫