How the Edge of Our Galaxy Defies Known Physics
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 5 ธ.ค. 2019
- How is it possible that you can't see 95% of the universe? The edge of our milky way defies known physics, so physicists are using the LHC at CERN to search for Dark Matter.
Dianna Cowern from Physics Girl visited CERN and spoke to theoretical physicists about Dark Matter.
Why this stuff costs $2700 Trillion per gram: • Why This Stuff Costs $... (Antimatter at CERN)
Creator and Writer - Dianna Cowern
Research - Sophia Chen, Imogen Ashford
Editor/Videography - Levi Butner
Thanks: CERN, Dorota Grabowska, Loic Bommersbach, Sarah Charley, Daniella Bardalez Gagliuffi, Heather Dewis
Special thanks to our Sally Ride patrons: Alejandro Gutierrez, Brian O'Connell, Darkbit, Dave Butler, Edi, Fabrice Eap, Henning Bitsch, Kenneth Hunter, Margaux Lopez, and Rishi Dixit.
Join the Physics Girl Patreon community! ►► / physicsgirl
Sources:
Galactic rotation curves:
arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/9909252
Searching for Dark Matter with ATLAS (at CERN)
atlas.cern/updates/atlas-feat...
The Day the World Didn’t End (NASA)
science.nasa.gov/science-news...
Vera Rubin
www.annualreviews.org/doi/ful...
MOND Papers
adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1983Ap...
arxiv.org/pdf/gr-qc/0506021.pdf
arxiv.org/pdf/gr-qc/0703060.pdf - วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี
Anyone who has dropped a guitar pick knows about searching forever to find something you know is there.
Or a mechanic and a bolt.
Or the push pin/nail when you drop it, trying to hang something up
or a bead on the carpet
@@Crazy_Kakoos 9l9999999ll9999lll99lll9999llllll9lll999l9ll9l99999999lll999lll99ll9llllll9ll9llll99l9l9llll9l9lll9lll99999lll9lll99lll9llll999ll9llllll9l9lll9l99l9lll99llll9lll9lll99l9l9ll9l9llllllll9lllll99lll9llll9l9l9llllllllll9l9llll9l99l9llll9999l
@@MrHappy4311 9l9ll99l99ll9l9ll9l9l99lll
Teacher: "Why is your score so low?"
Me: "You only seeing 5%."
*4.9℅
This 5% thing. where does it come from? Of the Known universe, we can see 93 billion light years, but the constraint is unknown. Greene, Brian (2011). The Hidden Reality. Alfred A. Knopf.
There is no peer space it comes in different thicknesses
wackywong I taught science and math for 15 years, and if I were hit with this one, I'd have given it an A for comprehension.
dark answers?
I love stuff like this. I wasn't the only kid in the 60's to ask the geography teacher why the continents looked like a jigsaw puzzle. I wasn't the only student in physics to ask how come there are spiral galaxies when the solar system is not spiral at all. Even in my degree, they insisted that proteins denatured at high temps when you can clearly see the green slime in Iceland and Yellow Stone.
Love listening to these young minds, this lady and Diane, their eyes are wide open to anything.
it's funny you say that, even my my mum wondered as a child why all the continents seemed to "fit together"
Have you seen Particle Fever?
That was a solid video!. I'm familiar with the content, but still found your descriptions and information to be a big value added!
“we have narrowed down the mass to 90 orders of magnitude. It’s between a neutrino and the mass of the observable universe”
So you’ve basically nailed it
she explained it VERY badly,lol
lol
Thomas Urech: "So you’ve basically nailed it"
Maybe she was hammered at the time?
We are so close.
Thomas Urech It's called a loose upper and lower bound, the minimum maximum and the maximum minimum. Sometimes there is no minimum minimum or maximum maximum. You just keep finding more and more local maximums and minimums. 😐😐😐😐😐😐
I like that she used Siri to confirm her answer, not to give her the answer.
If you need Siri to do a simple subtraction, physics is not the field for you.
@@craigcorson3036 And if you never check your conclusions, science of any type is not the field for you.
@@JimFortune So, you think that the result of subtracting a number from 100 counts as a conclusion? Only by a very broad definition of that word.
@@craigcorson3036 What narrow definition of "conclusion" excludes it?
@@JimFortune The kind used by scientists when they are conducting experiments and doing basic research. Their conclusion comes at the end of those processes. They don't come to a conclusion every time they do a math problem.
I first learned about this when I was 14, and I was excited that something hadn't been discovered yet and I would get to eventually learn what it was. I'm 41 now, and still waiting.
Thanks for the explanation. It really helped my understanding. However, the one question no one seems to address is how we know that the galaxies are spinning faster than they should be? How do we measure the speed of rotation of a galaxy? How do we measure their total mass and the mass of the inner and outer stars? What is the difference? What is the variation of results when multiple galaxies are compared?
Earth has to send them a speeding ticket !
@@malcolmhardwick4258 I suppose they measure the relative red shifts of known atomic bands on both sides of the galactic centre - I think that would work for a galaxy with an axis not pointing directly at us. Like measuring Hubble's constant except only looking at changes in speeds across a chosen galaxy.
Great Question Jon. Whats the difference in the rotational variation against the calculated mass of a given galaxy.
You can measure the speed by observing the stars' motion relative to the center, and the mass based on the orbit relative to the center.
The last part though, I think is what the woman in the video was saying, where dark matter is anywhere from non-existent in some galaxies, to 95% of the mass in others. So I guess the leading theory is it varies from galaxy to galaxy (?).
i think relativity best explains how this speed can be measured
My last job interview I was asked, "What's your education background. I said "I was working toward my PhD in physics but I didn't quite complete it". Interviewer said, "Nice, how far did you get?" Me: "About the 10th grade."
I would have given you the job on the spot...
haha..... me too.
HaHa :)
I need to remember that one. :)
Good joke. I will have to remember that one
They only ask "what is dark matter", they never ask "how is dark matter' :(
I'll do you one better: why is dark matter?
@@888PsyMike888 "I would catch it"!
WHO is Dark Matter?!
Dark matter matters.
@@888PsyMike888 darkmatter is gamora
"Is it possible we don't understand gravity?" Here is the question. There is a hole in modern physics, and it is filled with the idea of 'Dark Matter'.
Good question! That hole can only be filled with the acceptance of god in science by the scientific community! Only then the we will move beyongd this dead end of ignorance and a new era of physics will open it doors! Its the only way forward but it goes against all norms! Lets see it wouldn’t be in our life times I guess
@@abutorab1004 religion is the only thing in our world that is not related to science at all, so yeah that’s not the answer because it’s not scientific and can’t be measured scientifically in any way. You can’t just go “oh I guess god is science now hooray all our problems are solved and everything makes sense” because that would just be a cheap way of brushing off the unknown
Yep. Like the old "Phlogiston" theory of combustion.
Just found this channel, and absolute love it. It’s what I have been searching for, for aeons. Thank you for the great videos.
I'd just like to point out that Dork Energy would make a good name for a band of physics researchers.
Or “W.I.M.P gang” 😂
Jim's videos brilliant idea! I work at CERN and I am part of it's music's club. I'll suggest your suggestions and credit you. Promised!
@@aurora2319 Thank you! The ATLAS folks made an album a couple years ago which I enjoy, I'm curious to see what else comes out of your community!
Big Dork Energy?
So you're saying we're completely in the Dark, literally and figuratively.
Nah, only 95%.
@@VoltisArt Ah good, so there's a light at the end of the Large Hadron tunnel.
@@KimberlyGreen At the end of $50 Billion LHC.
Hopefully next episode we will learn about black holes and event horizons.... Because that's also new information to the majority of the people who get recommended this.......... This video makes me so sad !
*+The One True Kira* sad :-?
why sad¿
there are aplenty things that we (as a species) won't ever fully figure out.
(including.. who we really are)
and it's okay.. i guess
we still don't close our minds (inquisitiveness)(
Really admire your work. Never been a student of physics but still find your videos interesting. Love from India. Keep up! 😊
Wonderful video. Toward the end, Physics Girl said: "I'm still hung up on the fact that we can only see five percent of our universe."
As a species, maybe our "seeing" is limited. We know that animals have a keener sense of smell than humans. Maybe our sense of sight is just as limited.
From all the discourse on "dark matter" I have read about, the concept strikes me as being just a label for that which we do not understand. Couldn't we just as easily call it "dark chocolate"? And I further wonder whether dark "matter" is actually the same thing as dark "energy", but just in a slightly different form.
Agreed. With our use of detectors for non-visible light, we shouldn't be surprised that there are still things we can't "see".
And "Dark Matter" is one of these two things:
(1) Matter that exists (holds galaxies together, gravitational lensing, etc.) but we haven't figured out how to detect; or,
(2) an indication that our theories on what matter and energy are are wrong, and that it's not a lack of matter that muck up our expectations of galaxy observations.
@@my-back-yard " I consider myself a materialist, but I don't like that term because it implies that we know what matter is". Sir Roger Penrose :)
In response to your last sentence, all known matter is the same thing as energy just in a slightly different form, so yeah.
I'm also curious if this has something to do with why so far we are not detecting any other verifiable advanced civilizations in the observable universe. The argument has always been that we should be detecting radio waves if there were other civilizations because that seems the most likely way that any would be communicating, at least through a major portion of their history. It could be like Star wars or Star Trek out there but they are using some other form of communication and our species just can't detect it. Maybe other life forms are even invisible or noncorporreal from our point of view.
I definitely prefer "dark chocolate." At least it's delicious!
At age 32, bog down by the responsibility and demands of society I kinda forgotten how it felt to be amazed by science.
i remember as a kid how science was a lens to look at the beauty of the world. And that feeling is amazing.
Science doesn't care about my emotions but I like to be sentimental and be inspired about it.
Without the child like wonder of "Eureka" where is the motivation to go search for more knowledge?
So thank you for doing this.
i saw someone who looked exactly like you the other day while i was playing piano at work, i was like omg are you physics girl, she was confused and asked if it was a super hero
😂😂😂
Of course
Wkwkwk
In the mythos of the original Star Wars continuity, there is a bubble that surrounds the Star Wars galaxy, this bubble is known as the circumferential hyperspace barrier and prevents travel outside of the galactic boundary.
amazing
it's like finding "the edge of true love feeling we experience" (a flash back of my study in astronomy 1979-1981 in Bosscha Observatory)
_NASA ANNOUNCEMENT_
"We know this sounds weird, but dark matter turns out to be mostly birds... and cake batter."
Oooh, BIRDS! I thought she said "Berts", like multiple people called Bert and I got so confused by that 🙈
What flavor?
@@dougpine4746 pidgeon
Deep fried?
@@midnight8341
Bert and Ernie memes are waiting for you on the Internet to be discovered.
“Without this the Milky Way couldn’t exist”
Thumbnail: points to PBS
they changed the title lol
Yeah i just noticed that
How can one change an alleged universal law?
donepearce Its was a play on the importance of PBS.
ＲＥＬＡＸ.
@@ugoeze7360 It*
You do such a great job and always find interesting topics! I was glued to this conversation
The picture of the galaxy you posted on this show, is neat! I like M-33; i think galaxies are so cool. They resemble whirlpools, tornadoes, and hurricanes, i think there's a strong relevance there.
My favorite galaxy might be M81, which is some 11.7 light years distant. Hence we are seeing it as it was long before there were any humans on the earth-when our remote ancestors were little more than arboreal apes.
I love how you showed a clip of a vehicle digging when you said "...looked for dark matter here on Earth". I know it was probably them digging to make something like the LHC, but I just can't stop picturing scientists with little gold-pans sifting through all the dirt going "Nope, no dark matter in this pan" all day
That would mean an actual particle has to be produced, when it's math and speculation one can keep coming up with new ideas ad nauseum without having to evidence one's "discoveries".
the passion you have is contagious and precious.
i concur. she should change her name to PhysicsGoddess. her enthusiasm is divine (and refreshing) 💯
Oh daddy!
she is a layman speculating on things she knows nothing about unfortunately.
@@mickrussom ...hence all the references to her previous work on dark matter. OBVIOUSLY she wouldn't know anything about what she spent a lot of time studying.
Perhaps if we studied in your proximity we could observe small scale gravitational lensing just above your neck.
Great video, Dianna presented in a way that we can follow and understand the subject.
"I wonder if the explanation is even more complex than we imagine at present"
It is.
Guaranteed.
So some people might be familiar with the name of Hannes Alfven. He was both an electrical engineer, and an astrophysicist. He applied what he knew of the laws of electrodynamics as laid out by Maxwell, Ampere, and Faraday to what he saw in the cosmos in what are still considered to be 'unconventional' ways, one of which was to interpret the rotation of spiral galaxies according to everyday electrodynamic principles. They even named some plasma phenomenon after him (Alfven waves), and he also was awarded a Nobel Prize in Physics for his work on magnetohydrodynamics, although he later went on to revise his understanding of electrodynamics to essentially revoke his earlier postulates on MHD.
Anyway, Alfven noted that the rotation of spiral galaxies behaved like a Faraday disk, or a homopolar motor. Essentially, if you pump an electric current through a plasma, it will rotate due to the Lorentz Force. Since the galaxy is a big pool of plasma, it whirls due to the Lorentz Force but cannot escape because of the concurrent magnetic field created by the initiating electric current. This would also explain the 'how' of spiral galaxies, as well as the 'why'.
An interesting sidenote to the above is that there is an almost equal amount of visible plasma as there is hypothesized 'dark matter/energy/etc'. Simply by considering basic nuclear chemistry and the behavior of dipolar atoms in electromagnetic fields, one is able to explain: the observations of the matter at the edge of galaxies and why they do not slingshot away into the void; the bipolar geometry of stellar systems/galaxies/galactic clusters/etc; the axial alignment of visible galaxies; magnetic fields at all scales of observation in the cosmos; high frequency emissions of cosmic objects of all scales. The list really does go on and on...
The list really does go on an on and on. Just as Hannes Alfven, who is known as the Father of Plasma Cosmology, applied his knowledge of electrodynamics and the behaviors of plasma to astrophysics, I would encourage anyone interested in astronomy and astrophysics to consider taking a course in either Nuclear Chemistry or even just Basic Electricity. It really and truly makes SO much more sense of modern observations of the cosmos than the old Standard Theory does.
Peace :)
Who would have thought that atomic structure would have anything to do with the visible universe.
You explained it better than my comment...those who believe in "dark matter" will not change their mind no matter the results of observations, the simplest explanation doesn't apply when you are receiving funding researching something that doesn't exist.
Yes! Plasma Cosmology!
@Craig Carmichael No sir, a bit south of there in Minnesota, USA :)
Tesla thought we live in an electromagnetic universe. He's probably right
Dark Matter is a Batch that fixes the Universe simulation Bugs.
you mean a patch?
@@cheesywiz9443 when your software needs an update, you give it an update batch ;)
@@hqcart1 In a SImulation it will probably be a Batch Routine that runs on a schedule, depending on triggers or run manually. Not extremely clear the details of manual instigation. But then I am not a Theoretical Physics Scientist. My bias is Software Engineering and the Turing machine.
Off-Topic: I want to wish Physics Girl and all her followers the most wonderful and warm Generic Holidays! Emphasis on Generic, of course. Go Woke, Go Broke and have to add "Epstein Didn't Kill Himself".
@@hqcart1 well it might be a batch file but is still an update patch...
True.
I wonder if faster 'time' rather than faster speeds could be anything to do with what you are seeing if the universe appears to be spinning faster than it's calculated mass appears to be, so you don't really need any more matter to explain the speeds you think you are observing. It's a calculation taking into account the affects of mass and gravity on time that you need.
At relativistic speeds , perceived mass increases in proportion to the energy input. So you are probably correct
That would be an idea to make sense, but only if the stars near the center appeared like they were moving slower than they should be. Because our time frame should be faster than theirs.
I'm pretty sure some physicists already had the same idea but they found a way to prove it wrong
@@Henning_S. yes ..i expect that's true
I finally understand the spinning thing thanks to the two demonstrators spinning each other! Thanks for your channel!
Dark Matter is a myth: stars get a Gravity Multiplier when they're on a kill streak.
That is at least a better postulation than dark matter.
@@MegaBanne Yeah, it's the other big guess. No proof for either, barring super-cool online roleplaying jokes!
@@shifttheshaman
Your suggestion does at least have creativity and openmindedness.
Now see, right there? Your theory makes sense to me 😂
Lol
Dark Matter: "You merely adopted the dark. I was born in it, molded by it"
Proceeds to break regular matters spine.
@@Snoogen11
You fight like younger matter, nothing held back...
They say Light travels at 186,326 miles per second.
But what about the SPEED OF DARK?
@@rdelrosso2001 Dark is the absense of light; therefore 186,282 mps.
th-cam.com/video/iEzTO-T9H9o/w-d-xo.html
You asked the question whether dark matter does not exist and we simply have a limited understanding of gravity at a very large scale. I have wondered this myself, but your explanation early in this video of why the existence of dark matter seems more likely was very good. I've listened to a lot of people talking about the subject, but this is the first time I have felt half-convinced.
Physics, especially astrophysics, has always been something that I am very interested and passionate about. I never took any Physics classes in HS as my interest mainly developed from star gazing, in my earlier days, to watching countless youtube videos learning about Physics. I'm 32 now and recently started re attending my local Community College to resume the process of getting a degree in Computer Programming. I enjoy computers and love to tinker with them and play games, but I would love to take some Physics classes as well. The joy I feel from thinking about taking Physics classes makes me want to take a full course load and just soak up all the info I can. So therefore, I'm starting to think I should consider switching my major but I don't really know what all fields are out there...tbh, I don't really know what kind of jobs are out there for it or even if it's in demand. The only careers that I could think of would be to teach (not a fan) and I would assume that NASA would need to hire some people who are educated in the field.
When the LHC is done with its primary mission, they should use it to crack walnuts.
Why do that when your livelihood is directly tied to GDP of the nations who fund it? #GravyTrain
They should use it to crack open those pistachios that got into the bag with their shells intact.
@@commentfreely5443 So we have walnuts and pistachious and fudge....... are we baking a cake.
@@leqin
No, but we'll need the cake batter to dip those birds in...
CFGC...Canada Fried Goose Cake! ^_-
Poultry based desserts are the next big thing. :-D
I saw somewhere the particle is so small you wouldn’t even bleed from a head wound from it. Could it clip a neuron and suddenly you don’t remember how to wiggle your right big toe though? That would be pretty boss.
I learned more from you than PBS Space Time, and any other channel. Thank you for speaking to people like me, who enjoy and are fascinated with space, but aren't a physics guru.
That PBS Space Time guy is really hard for the lay person to understand. I wish I did understand better.
Sorry Trevor I just posted up here so people would see the truth about the Dark matter farce...
You learned nothing. Space is a fantasy and dark matter is just a distraction from the fact that their "science" is nonsense.
@@jeremywallis1960, right. Physics says otherwise. I trust scientists far more than someone else who doesn't believe the basics of science.
8:12 "It doesn't have to be any one thing! It could be 40% birds, 60% cake batter." A beautifully ditzy yet somehow appropriate summation of our ignorance. Well done!
You can pause this randomly, and she almost always looks utterly enthralled in what you have to say.
Love the book on the shelf "We have no idea" - quite an apropos title for this subject .. matter.
Brief mention of dark energy as a whole other can of worms - can we have a video on it please?
@Toughen Up, Fluffy Try the Entropic Gravity theory of Erik Verlinde.
You need to hear him explain it many times before you understand it. Lol
@Toughen Up, Fluffyedit: just realized you were talking about conversion between dark energy and dark matter.
No, dark energy and dark matter are completely different things. Astronomers gave the name "dark matter" to objects that have mass, but do not interact with light. They gave the name "dark energy" to whatever phenomenon/property/entity that is causing the expansion of space itself to accelerate.
So yes, the naming was arbitrary. There is no reason to believe they are convertible, or even related at all.
Dark Energy seems to be matter and the fabric of space falling into a black hole from another universe. The increasing mass and speed of matter falling into the other universe's black hole may be why the expansion of this universe is accelerating. This universe may be a white hole, and is the 'other side' of a black hole.
Dark MATTER may be explained by gravity being not uniform. My explanation: Gravity is explained by the strong and weak nuclear forces leaking through from countless other universes. These other universes have changing fundamental forces, causing planets and matter itself to disintegrate in almost all of them. This gradient of disintegrated matter in these other universes causes particles in our U to move toward the higher concentration of particles. So, near the edge of galaxies, there is a bigger large-scale gradient of other universe's matter, vs closer to the center of a galaxy.
- A youtube commenter.
@@FLPhotoCatcher wow, thats a bit arbitrary.
FLPhotoCatcher If the universe has different phisics, why would it form also galaxies?
Or if it doesn’t have gravity, how does it form a black hole? If it forms a black hole, why is it leaking to this universe convinient places? If the other universe has gravity, where is it getting it?
Gravity was already present after the Big Bang. So the other universes formed black holes faster to pump stuff over here?
I feel like you are throwing darts at the wall and connect the random dots as a meaningful argument, just to have a theory.
If you think the edge of the galaxy defies known physics, just imagine how much the edge of the universe defies known physics. Could you even see it if you were standing at the edge? boggling
"The edge of the universe"?.. The universe has an edge??🙃
Well, that's the ultimate question, isn't it?
If you believe that the universe is finite and created from a big bang event, then it must have delimiting boundaries, perhaps on one side being the universe, and on the other being nothing at all, not even space. Or, more likely, does space wrap around so that the other side of the boundary is actually a continuation from the other side of the universe? Like the globe of the earth, could you get to one side of the universe by actually traveling in the opposite direction to your ultimate destination? In such a case, the universe would indeed seem infinite.
The Universal “Edge” is a very tricky subject.
The big bang isn’t expansion from a single point, like that of a Baloon.
But it’s more thought of as the expansion of an area on the *surface* of the balloon.
tThat means the Universe isn’t expanding from a single point, but everywhere at once, all the time, at a rate that’s increasing every second.
The “Edge” of the Universe is the Edge of “Our” Universe/The Universe we can see. The Universe is most definitely larger than we can see. What we call the Edge is just the edge of what we are able to see.
Think of the Edge as the Render Distance of a video game like Minecraft.
Yes, Im not referring to the the edge of the 'known universe', that which we simply cannot see beyond, but rather the edge that started out in the big bang and delimits the actual edge of the entire universe. Is it possibly true that the universe is unbound, and that there may not be an edge, the universe actually looping back upon itself, meaning that if you were to continue traveling in the same direction would you eventually arrive at your starting location?
Space may indeed have been concentrated in a single point at the time of the Big Bang, which would explain the Cosmic Microwave Background. I'm inclined to believe that the universe is not infinite, as infinity is a purely mathematical concept that really has no examples in reality. Again, boggling.
I love your channel, you’re a natural teacher and east communicator
Scientists have been looking for this dark matter
Me:*sitting on the couch*
Scientists: have you seen the dark matter?
Me: no
Scientists: are you sitting on it?
Me: no
Scientists: stand up
Me: No...
But is it denser then iron or not?
If so we should be able to see it.
If its not... then can't we basicly Make it by using hydron colliders??
Fusion and stuff? We can create gold or artificial diamond. Nature can't make any element denser then iron without the help of massive heat and pressure from supernovea or planet cores.
So... meh??? I cud be wrong tho
HAAAA
@Despiser Despised OMG
@@cherrydragon3120 lol
Dark matter is comprised primarily of odd socks and coat hangers.
And 10mm sockets.
And tupperware lids
@@nasonguy 10mm sockets? No wonder they haven't found it.
wunnell
Plectrums too.
And biro tops.
i find the videos on this channel so interesting, i should really watch more of them.
People never take into account spacial time/gravity in regards to the speed of the outside of galaxies. Stars distances between themselves is huge. Dark matter does not exist. Stars are just following the gravity well of the galaxy. It's more like they are being pushed along rather then gravitationally connected to each other. .
I love how you present and explain the topic at hand. The way that you explain the descriptive nature of the subjects that you present makes it much easier to visualize the concepts of the subject matter.
"The simple things you see are all complicated" The Who - Substitute
not exacly if you see a stick you see stick nothing more nothing less. Do not try to make it something more than it is.
It wasn't intended as a stand-alone generalization by The Who or me. If you read the lyrics you will understand the context.
@@V3ntyl Try looking at a stick under a microscope, it's complicated.
@@V3ntyl if you're _good_ at seeing you'll see the type of tree, current and recent weather conditions, the time since the stick fell from the tree, the types of biome you could be in, and more. "Don't complicate things" is nice but ignores reality and possibility.
@@williamchamberlain2263 Exactly. A misleading oversimplification.
I read a long time ago that there was a quantum foam made up of virtual particles in empty space. The theory stated some particles might escape from their virtual state which might add mass to the universe, which might also add gravity and energy. I believe that is where so called zero point energy came from. Just a thought.
@4:22 "some galaxies don't have it at all"
That sounds like the key to the mystery.
Quiz show host "What is dark matter?"
Contestant "Er, no idea"
Quiz show host "somehow,... that is correct"
The Chase:
Bradley Walsh: What is dark matter?
Contestant: Pass
Bradley Walsh: Correct
Contestant: 👁👄👁
That's Numberwang!
@@Milamberinx I wanted to point out this dude just paraphrased the top comment for likes and how lame that is, but you're right - that's Numberwang, too.
7:49 "nor has anyone found any wimps"
well... here I am
No true wimp has the courage to call him or herself a wimp.
Machos either :P
@@MrGoatflakes
MAssive Compact Halo Objects?
@@rdelrosso2001 something like that
The gravitational force that is observed by the supposed "dark matter" may actually be an effect that is a first order observation of a second or third order interaction (that cannot be directly observed), hence, the need to create a first order "straw man" (dark matter), in order to make sense of the observed phenomena. Theoretical second and third order of wave field interactions could be producing a first order observable event, that which we measure as gravity. We assume that a massive object is causing this gravity well, but, that may very well not be the case. Fact is, in science, we don't know the quantity of that which we don't know. We are mere babes in the woods when it comes to knowledge, as science is just beginning to understand a little about how everything works.
I liked this presentation. Dark matter and dark energy are fascinating and incredibly important topics. Very recently, some physicists have theorized that there is an "anti-universe" out there, in which many of the "known" laws of physics run backwards. Some physicists even think that time runs backward in this "anti-universe." Some people think that this "anti-universe" is the source of dark matter and dark energy. I would love to hear what you think about this.
I wonder if people that believe in dark matter and dark energy criticize people that believe in ghosts.
Yes, I know that the concepts were introduced to explain certain observations, but also ghosts were.
@@usuarioenyt Not even close the same thing. I don't see how it corelates
Actual newspaper article: "Scientists Cannot Find Invisible Dark Matter"
One. It's invisible.
Two: it's dark.
Three: it's the Hide and Seek champion!
Journalism at it's peak.
Bet they didn't check the back of the sofa.
I like your comment
I vote on answer 3, just because it makes me chuckle the most.
This is like saying electricity, in 1850, is "Dark steam" . It does work. It causes change.
That’s it! I’m naming an electronica band “Dark Steam”. Sounds way better than my first idea of, “smog.”
Electricity is “Ether”.
@@JG-mp5nb Close! It's really an Electric Universe! Electricity is 39 times more attracting than gravity. And there is a theory that gravity is a property of electricity, that is still being researched. Also, electricity repels, as well as attracts, which can explain why cosmic structures, like galaxies, retain their structures over time. Electricity also has a dark mode, when current flow, in space, can't be seen. When the current is strong enough, it goes into a glow mode. The best example of it working, is in incandescent lights. If you're interested, you can go to The Electric Universe, or Thunderbolts.info.com sites.
@@williamrthompsonjr556 the "electric universe" is a pseudoscientific conspiracy theory
@@flamingspinach Thsnks for your opinion.
Every thing science has discover and show us so far about the universe, is that everything started from a single point of inflation that originated from nothing that has being theorized that is actually something, that something has existed for ever. Whatever it is, is the other 95% that act like gravity on the scale of a galaxies, by the mass speed. So, yeah, cheers to Vera Rubin!
Things like this always remind me of" the quote "It may turn out the universe is not only stranger than we imagine, but stranger than we can imagine."
Dark Matter is science speak for we don't have a clue.
I agree, like retrograde orbits when we thought Earth was center. So we "invent" something to make the MATH work.. "Fudge Data"
@@omrirotcod7035
Or "Luminiferous Aether". 😑
Could be 5 dimensional super beings playing with gravity magnets for all they know 🤷♂️
True
+1
8:13 "it could be 40% birds, 60% cake batter...metaphorically speaking". LOL just killing me. I love this sense of humour.
I believe this theory.
who does birds cake on butter ... oO
Who could not love her energetic M.O.... She's always smiling, positive vibes, a mind 20,000 times brighter than mine... and yes, a great sense of humor... I bet she has Gary Larsen "Scientist" cartoons in her pad.... I do... His "Paramecium Humor" is off the charts... Bless you Physics Girl...
I think it's probably 38% the feeling of a triangle, 62% sadness
I am a science teacher, and not a physicist, so my lifelong interest in astronomy and cosmology is more a hobby than even a study. I tried to understand Neutron Stars at age 15 in the mid seventies, so yes we have come a ways since then. As an occasional listener to Matt O'Doud, Anton Petrov, and Dr. Becky, I am finding you a lot of fun to listen to. I like folks like Matt O'Doud because I try to keep up a little, and he stretches my mind past my ability to even believe that I 'got it'. Your approach to your videos is a little history ( yay! ), with some credit where due, and very easy to understand for the layperson. I also appreciate that you find the subject matter itself exciting without need for extra sensationalism. I really liked this dark matter vid for how much you packed into ten minutes. Keep up the good work, Physics Girl!! Ranger G.
Your videos are VERY informative. You obviously are very well grounded in the nomenclature of physics. But for us who don't know terms such as "LHC" I suggest defining the term somewhere at the beginning of your video.
"The only thing that can hold stars in our galaxy is gravity" and what about the power of friendship?
Stars are notorious loners, they don't believe in it.
This comment might be onto sth. Why can't there be a new force that we don't know of
@@Arthur0000100 because a dark force is totally evil and we will have a bunch of weirdo running around waving a plasma torch like it is a completely sensible use of energy weapon.
damn i gotta send this signal to Murphy using gravitational waves
That's magic. We ain't gotta explain that.
My theory:
Dark Energy = Dark Matter x (Speed of Dark)^2
Dark Matter and Dark Energy are effectively the same thing
I know I haven’t included my derivation but I deserve a Nobel Prize, please.
Here take an apple instead🍎
@@gamesbond1380 Or maybe a Dark Apple...
_"Dark Matter and Dark Energy are effectively the same thing"_
No, they aren't. DM is effectively attractive, while DE is effectively repulsive.
Darkness is faster than light
Think about it,,,,,,,,,
Darkness always precedes light.
Without darkness how would one know there was light?
I knight thee Sir Dark
I've always enjoyed talking about physics, particularly with my uncle who is just absolutely brilliant but I have a hard time grasping some of the more advanced parts of physics. My uncle eats, sleeps and breathes physics, he is a commercial electrician by trade but he spends virtually ALL of his free time reading all the academic papers, discussing with his online physics communities. It just gets to a point where my head starts to hurt and my brain turns to mush lol but this was such an interesting video to watch! My uncle says if I'd applied myself more to mathematics in high school and college, I would probably be able to understand some of the concepts and details a little better. Makes me regret not applying myself in math and science mote but I was always an English and history buff
We need English and history Buffs too.
I wish I had a well paid job that meant I could keep saying to the boss "It's there, we've almost found it, but haven't quite got there yet."
I mean, the answer is that we _don't_ know that dark matter exists. The concept was invented to resolve the conflict between our observations and our models. There's nothing inherently wrong with that, in fact, this kind of thing is very common.
But dark matter may just be the next ether, or centrifugal force. The results that we get maybe not be due to a "quirk in math" but maybe a flaw in the way we are observing the universe overall.
What isn't mentioned here is gravitational lensing. Gravitational lensing causes optical illusion when a light source behind an object is seen at multiple points around the object. It is also why we see the sun set yet it has already set. Gravitational lensing is happening in areas where the math says the dark matter should be there. If the math is wrong, there wouldn't be the gravity in the area bending the light.
And what if it's electro-magnetism!?
We know it's there as much as we know gravity is there. However, both of them got some splainen to do!
.
Dark matter was a glitch in the simulation. The patch was cleverly hidden to look like it was always there when someone figures it out.
Dark Matter is the fundamental. You can't have a big event like the Big Bang without a place to have it. If there is no space/time, where does this bang take place? In this primordial substrate. What is it? A mold?
@George Pen I have a theory about this. Our math system is based on a linear progression; one, then two then three . . . I think math should follow a logical progression one divided into 2 that together become a unique 3rd. Like a premise and a related premise that yield a conclusion. The conclusion can become a premise and the logic is 1 premise plus another premise yeild a 3rd premise. I think such a system would help clear up a lot of glitches like PI and e.
What makes the simulation, if not a reality?
@@briankleinschmidt3664 In math, there is so much more than this.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Line_integral look up Cauchy, Riemann etc.
You can navigate around a singularity, and often still get a useful result etc.
What you bring in, actually is Constructivism.
Only the universe can simulate the universe.
I've often wondered if it's due to how compact stars are within compared to the outer edge that causes space to blend in such a way that it can create the event we see?
Gonna go out on a limb and assume they already ruled that one out.
I love your show!!! You are entertaining and informative!! Good luck finding Dark Matter.
By the thumbnail, thought it could not exist without Dianna.
So what you're to say is that we're still in the dark when it comes to matter?
Apparently to Everything.. we understand 4.9% what grade is this on a completed test?
@synchromorph 97% of scientists agree about climate change. 100% agree that Epstein didn't kill himself.
@Toughen Up, Fluffy Orange man bad. C02 making the world die. That's the consensus of 151% of scientists now.
To conclude a fractional percentage of a thing you first need to know what a 100% of the thing is .
@@tracker001 1000% of politicians agree with everything they are paid to.
Apparently the connection is the eye strike proposition where when looking at the center of a galaxy the out side becomes a section of the eye strike.
When you see a galaxy, you are looking at differing rates of time and differing measures of distance. Outside of a galaxy, there is very little matter mass and gravity to slow down time and shorten distance.
What slows down light *from our perspective* is the gravity in the vicinity that slows down the *rate* of time. (It’s not that light slows down, it’s the rate of time that slows down.)
So what happens where there is no gravity is that the rate of time speeds up relative to our rate of time so that starlight travels the same (or greater) distance at a faster rate of time. It’s still traveling the *same relativistic frame speed* but an entire second passes by from our perspective at a much faster rate, in a fraction of a second *where there is no gravity* to slow down time. So for most of the time, starlight is traveling through space at a faster rate of time relative to our rate of time.
That means starlight arrives much more instantaneously because the rate of time is free from the effects of gravity for most of the way. With no mass of its own, starlight arrives instantaneously as it experiences no time of its own traveling at the speed of light. We see things in slow motion *where time is slowed down* by gravity.
This relativistic effect allows for a young earth since it doesn’t take billions of lightyears for starlight to arrive through the *void* of space where there is no matter to slow down *time.*
*Fun Fact:*
The Big Bang was just Michael Bay directing the Universe
Wowwww! How clever Mr. NeverWashHisCock, I have a real issue with your so called "joke". It first begins with the fact I dont like you. And yea, i guess that basically ends all my facts up to this point. Go squander the streets for nickles dated before the 1980's and get lost.
@@plint99 toxicity is starting to become a problem
I'm going to follow you simply because Cash Lint is such a monumental douchnozzel
Oh my - @@plint99 doesn't think his dad respects him. Poor Mr @Cash Lint ; cry for him.
This is not true, because then the contents would be boring.
Amazing video, am very excited to explore more of your content. I teach English overseas in a primary school and I have many students that are so very interested in science. Many of them are young girls, so that is awesome, and sharing your videos in class will certainly help encourage them. Makasih banyak!
Her guest sitting there is probably one of the greatest explorers of the entire human race.
Time is moving faster for stars on the outside and slower for stars on the inside.
looking at a galaxy sideways on, what would you see?
Unless something other than gravity can curve space time too. As Douglas Adams said: 'The whole fabric of the space-time continuum is not merely curved, it is in fact totally bent.'
We have never witnessed space time not subject to gravity - who is to say it was ever straight to being with?
2:28 best explanation of centripetal force.
Nice video !! One thing I'd like to know though, that I've never seen in video from the CERN is....how is the CERN working? Not 'technically', but more like 'administratively'.
Are they doing tons and tons of collision every day with different parameters, and put the data available to the researchers, that could find what they need? Does researchers have to make protocols first (if yes, how long does it take between the draft of the protocol and getting the results of the experiment)? How many collision per day are happening? All this kind of stuff :)
What is the life of a CERN researcher basically :)
That's a video idea for The Administration Girl.
That's a nice of a subject for a video. I'll talk with the people in the video / media dept
In the meantime here's some starters
th-cam.com/video/-fXAsrZ-ePM/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/-fXAsrZ-ePM/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/AdJn82JwhTM/w-d-xo.html
and of course the official youtube channel th-cam.com/users/CERNTV
They do like 20 million collisions per second. Then they have software to sort the ones that are not really that interesting. They store only the interesting ones. So theres this big chache of collision results researchers have access to.
This could be explained by Moshe Carmeli's modification to general relativity. This allows a differential rotation due to gravity which would come into play in very heavy objects like galaxies. There has been some evidence collected agreeing with this by John Harnett the inventor of the atomic fountain clock.
The guitar pick analagy made my morning. Lol. With me, my favorite writing pens always hide in obscure places..clearly, dark energy fields have enveloped the pens
Needs to say "The observable Universe"
ju-....just stop
Accuracy is paramount. otherwise it's just more muddle.
So dark matter is just stuff with stuff that we just don’t don’t know what this stuff is. Awesome.
probably just normal matter but inside a thing which information can't get out so we can't know they exist like a matter inside a blackhole
Well, we have to given the observation a name, even if we don't understand it..... better than saying, "that stuff, you know.... out there!"
@@Vvopat96 Lol, that sentance 😂
When talking about percentage of dark matter to dark energy to regular matter, is it based on the calculated volume of the universe or is it to balance an equation based on the observed volume of regular matter?
I guess I am left wondering why we expect it to be some sort of exotic particle that is missing from our current model when instead i believe that there must simply be some kind of force acting in twisting, long strands throughout the universe, sheparding galaxies along these strands and holding them together along with the gravity in each galaxy doing its thing as well.I think the biggest mistake cosmologists have ever made is to think that the Big Bang model explains the universe. Hving said that though....I still have enormous respect for Physics Girl.
Honest question. What in the findings of physics have led you, pointed, to these force strands?
*Hello darkness my old friend...*
I’ve come to look for you again...
Mit Seraffej 😂🤣😂
Lee Blaclock .
Hello darkness my old friend
I’ve come to look for you again
In a buried tank of liquid xenon
I wait for a flash to spur my dreams on
And the vision of my Nobel Prize
Is still alive
Within the bounds of funding
Reiya Aurum I`ve come to talk to you again.
Nothing even matters anymore
"For decades, scientists have looked for dark matter here on Earth..."
Did they check under the couch cushions?
There is a very good possibility it just may be in couch lint balls... :)
Only loose change and some M&M's.
Ask the cat.
@@patrickr3400 before you checked under the cushions they were dark m&ms and dark coins
Im always dark matter in my pockets AFTER I do laundry.
Learning that some galaxies don’t have dark matter is MESSING ME UP
Reminds me of the Incubus song 'New Skin'......It has a sample of Buckminster Fuller over a guitar solo that says 'Until the Twentieth Century, reality was everything humans could touch, smell, see, hear. Since the initial publication of the chart of the electromagnetic spectrum, humans have learned that what they can touch, smell, see and hear, is less than one millionth of reality.'
It was a sobering thought nearly 30 years ago when I first heard it....It's even more sobering now with all the new things we've learned since. It is intriguing that the more we learn, the more we come to realize how much we don't know.
"We don't know what this is, we don't know how that works, it's all theoretical.
I can tell you what's what and change my mind in ten years. And I still get paid.
And I can never be proven wrong".
I want that gig.
Become a preacher then
Or a weather man! Who else can be so wrong so often, and then claim a 99% success rate?
Psephologist anyone?
@@AnalyseThiswithIO Gesundheit
Psychiatry is the same kind of hustle
Random thought:
- Evidence for dark matter is based on seeing effects related to it's gravitational influence.
- Gravitational force can be considered (equivalent to) an emergent property of time dilation, in a way
- If one considers the universe as analogous to a simulation, one could consider mass as we know it plus a certain overhead to be the computational cost of a given planck length region of space. One could consider time dilation (and thus gravity) to be emergent from (or at least analogous to) a local computational bottleneck in the universe
- If you can only interact with something via gravity... well essentially you can only interact with it via a local computational bottleneck... essentially like how much CPU resources you're taking from each other... and well that really sounds like a virtual machine situation doesn't it
- So depending on the nature of dark matter, it may well be that searching for it could be considered akin to breaking out of a virtual machine into the host system to find out what the heck else is taking CPU resources
Or the one who created the simulation didn't care to realistically "paint" the galaxies. They just put everything far away and out of reach, they are essentially an animated matte painting.
@Lalrivunga Hnamte Could it be delayed gravity from past times that only gradually gets there acting on things just now?
She answered her own question in beginning with spinning with another individual. The strength of the bond between each spinning object. Kids playground equipment from 1960's, 1970's with spinning disc. Fun times learning. Be careful if trying it now.
Stay safe
4:27 the sass! I wish I knew of physics girl and watched all this live and at release. But thankfully I have 90 orders of magnets dude worth of videos to watch
I love how you showed a clip of a vehicle digging when you said "...looked for dark matter here on Earth".
Dianna I got a question that has always given me some fun. If you launch a huge mirror at 99% of light speed, facing towards earth and you take a telescope and look at your mirror 50 years later. What will you see? 100 years? longer? What if we could send it 100 light years away but like through a wormhole just in 1 year. What would we see?
This is the most intriguing question I've heard in a long time!.
I want an answer too!!♥️
so, since light doesn’t slow down(supposedly), then when light is reflected off of it, the light will still be moving towards us at light speed, so that we would see(in years ago) however many light years away it is.
and i apologize for the run on sentence, i should’ve read it over.
To calculate the answer, you have to use the Lorentz transformation.
So, you'd see the Earth, massively red-shifted, 49.5 years ago and as you watched, things on Earth would move at 1% normal speed.
Remember the pool experiment?
The plate?
The double vortex?
The shadows on the bottom of the pool?
You may want to meditate on that.
The scientific mind is also poetic as it ponders. It wanders as it ponders at the wonders.
The more dense something is means atomically there is more motion!
Any motion in a pressure atmosphere creates low pressure and everything forces to it!