Good overview, though as mentioned, prelims are history for most cases now. Moot suggestion on wording - at 2:20-2:45 you used the term "creating inconsistencies" 3 times. Perhaps its better to express it as 'revealing' inconsistencies in witness testimony, which in turn create defensive opportunities. We don't create evidence, we test it. Curious - its been 5 years now since the change on preliminary hearings - do you feel its changed things for the worse or not? Thanks for the vids - great refreshers for us non-crim types.
Good overview, though as mentioned, prelims are history for most cases now. Moot suggestion on wording - at 2:20-2:45 you used the term "creating inconsistencies" 3 times. Perhaps its better to express it as 'revealing' inconsistencies in witness testimony, which in turn create defensive opportunities. We don't create evidence, we test it. Curious - its been 5 years now since the change on preliminary hearings - do you feel its changed things for the worse or not? Thanks for the vids - great refreshers for us non-crim types.
Its a language