Film Scan Comparison

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 15 เม.ย. 2020
  • Hey all you cats and kittens, in this week's episode, Jason breaks the minimum 6ft social distancing rule and gets closer to the camera, and to your hearts.
    Scan comparison between Epson scan, Silverfast, and Negative Lab Pro (lightroom)
    Scanners in video:
    Epson v700
    Video recorded on my phone, and Sony a7rii.
    Social Media:
    Instayams: @50_shades_of_jason
    ===============
    AFFILIATES: (Helps support my channel)
    MUSIC provided by Epidemic Sound. Sign up here and get your first 30 days free:
    share.epidemicsound.com/grainy...
    BACKPACK: moment.8ocm68.net/emJor
    ================
    Business Inquiries: pigmodegraingang@gmail.com

ความคิดเห็น • 395

  • @NatePhotographic
    @NatePhotographic 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1503

    Hi! Nate here, maker of Negative Lab Pro. This video is so great... couldn't stop laughing. Well done. A couple of hints on Negative Lab Pro that may be helpful for viewers. 1) For Tiff scans, I recommend NOT using Lightroom's white balance tool prior to conversion. Without getting into all the technical details, the white balance tools works differently on RAW files vs Tiff/Jpeg files. White balancing on a TIF/JPG prior to conversion is likely to result in strong turquoise casts (which some people love, and others hate - so I guess to each his own?). So here, you could either just convert without white balancing prior to conversion, or you could use the included "Tif Scan Prep" utility, which will more correctly balance out the film prior to conversion. It isn't usually necessary, but you'll get slightly more accurate results if you do that step. You could also create a RAW DNG with either Silverfast or Vuescan, which could then make use of Negative Lab Pro's raw camera profiles. I usually think this produces better results. 2) The default "standard" profile in Negative Lab Pro is on the punchier side, and is based on Lab Scanners default contrast profiles. You can make the "linear + deep" or "linear + flat" profiles the default if you want something flatter, or adjust the whiteclip and blackclip points to taste. Everything you do in Negative Lab Pro in non-destructive (unlike EpsonScan and Silverfast) so it's easy to adjust and re-adjust always working against the original. 3) For backlit scenes, a quick trick you can do is to crop in to just the foreground, and then run the conversion (you can re-crop after). NLP will optimize based on whats in the crop at the time of conversion. 4) Future versions of NLP will have more options for gamut control - which will be especially useful for controlling the bright cherry reds and intense turquoise colors. Hope that helps, and thanks again for the awesome videos you make!

    • @briansavage932
      @briansavage932 4 ปีที่แล้ว +135

      You're a scholar and a gentleman, Nate!
      Your milkshake brings all the film photographers to the yard.

    • @kpsnow2411
      @kpsnow2411 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Great tips Nate!

    • @sigibergmann9356
      @sigibergmann9356 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      u are a god Nate!

    • @connieandstewart
      @connieandstewart 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      dropping knowledge! I'll have to try this out and see how the results change! thank you Nate!

    • @user-kt1by9oz9p
      @user-kt1by9oz9p 4 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      I'm going to translate this to some Chinese user of negative lab,thank you so much.

  • @KodakBoy
    @KodakBoy 4 ปีที่แล้ว +489

    Ok you had your fun Jason now can I please have my scanner back, I’m sending my wife’s boyfriend to pick it up since you broke my nose and clogged the toilet

  • @Denouermont
    @Denouermont 4 ปีที่แล้ว +232

    “So you can get liked by all 6 of your parents alt accounts” haha so true

    • @fandyus4125
      @fandyus4125 4 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Seriously though, it pains me to get my shots I worked hard on get 5 likes when some random girl can put a filter on her face and get 127. Instagram really isn't the way imho.

    • @riccardonecci8083
      @riccardonecci8083 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@fandyus4125 I've been seriously asking myself what's the way to go though... Like, how tf can I make someone at least interact with my photos!?

    • @dapeaceswagger
      @dapeaceswagger 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@fandyus4125 true that. plus it really isn't the best way to appreciate photography (it crops images, quality is poor and you can't really zoom in to see the details)

    • @fandyus4125
      @fandyus4125 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@riccardonecci8083 You can't, the market is too oversaturated.

    • @riccardonecci8083
      @riccardonecci8083 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@fandyus4125 that is a sad truth my friend.

  • @JudsonGraham
    @JudsonGraham 4 ปีที่แล้ว +272

    literally died laughing at the youtube film photographers avengers thing

    • @mastaw
      @mastaw 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Rest in Peace
      Judson Graham
      ???? - 2020

    • @thegreaterconundrum
      @thegreaterconundrum 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Nick Carver - Dr. Strange
      Matt Day - Captain America

    • @captaincrazy5075
      @captaincrazy5075 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      I think he forgot Analog Insights

    • @Frank-Ding
      @Frank-Ding 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I'm kinda new to the film photographers youtube space. Would somebody be kind enough to tell me who each of the "film photographer avengers" are?

    • @dubumowith7376
      @dubumowith7376 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Analog insights = vision ?

  • @kian8382
    @kian8382 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    You and Nick Caver are the best two film photography channels I've found, really enjoyable to watch.

  • @onefortrees
    @onefortrees 4 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    The picture of the mountains during sunrise is stunning. Clap

  • @MrViizualiZe
    @MrViizualiZe 4 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    asked a question about this on the livestream, got ignored but got a video out of it. Life is good.

  • @stephenwdunn6712
    @stephenwdunn6712 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    One of the funniest guys on TH-cam. Videos are informative and fun. Self depricating but always on the money.

  • @MrElectroman3
    @MrElectroman3 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is exactly what I’ve been trying to compare for months. Thank you for this.

  • @StevenShermanSingularity
    @StevenShermanSingularity ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Love the commentary. Recently purchased the Plustek Opticfilm 8200 ai scanner with 8.8 silverfast to scan decades of my parents slide photos. Still learning the correct settings especially for any underexposed slides...... Hundreds of Kodak Carousels in my closets now to be scanned. I am sure eventually I shall master the settings... Keep up the fantastic commentary and enjoy a beer discussing the wisdom of life and the value of an analog life....

  • @michisgouro2637
    @michisgouro2637 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Love the videos editing and special effects made the comparison experience an absolute blast! 🙏🏻

  • @calahad
    @calahad 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I didn't know it before but now it's clear. Your sarcasm is one of the many things that keep me afloat in these trying times.

  • @anonharingenamn
    @anonharingenamn 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    What a beautifully edited video. You made the comparison "shots" really, really well.

  • @imanevilpotatoe7546
    @imanevilpotatoe7546 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I just bought an Epson scanner this morning, and you conforted me in my choice.
    Great video as always, finally one that kills my boring ass quarantine day routine

  • @vikmanphotography7984
    @vikmanphotography7984 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    This was the video that we all badly needed. I had been wanting a comparison like this for a while.
    I wish that you developed your own film so that you could compare B/W developers

  • @Viniskates
    @Viniskates 4 ปีที่แล้ว +37

    I came here for the comedy and was not disappointed!

  • @justinjamison8678
    @justinjamison8678 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Super informative, Jason. I've been using Vuescan for a while but I'm looking to change things up. I definitely appreciate the humor that you bring to your reviews as well. Well done.

  • @olawalesanni2872
    @olawalesanni2872 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Negative lab was my favorite version! Thanks for testing them out for us!

  • @Jeff-rs7xd
    @Jeff-rs7xd 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I AM SO GLAD YOU UPLOADED TODAY!!

  • @joeltunnah
    @joeltunnah 3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    I turn “CCR” (color cast removal) off in Silverfast. I find it often screws up the colors.
    I watched so many of these comparisons and reviews last year, I’m confident that Silverfast is overall the best scanning software. For reference I use a Plustek 8200i.

  • @HeyxArno
    @HeyxArno 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    The dialogue in this video is my spirit animal. Thank you for giving me something I didn't know I needed. Scanning part is informative I guess.

  • @alexxedge
    @alexxedge 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Really enjoyed this video. Definitely informative, and you're mood is just nailing how we all feel right now...just trapped with our own thoughts.

  • @jdpst20
    @jdpst20 4 ปีที่แล้ว +41

    4:42 I would totally take the EPSON Scan over the other two. It's just way more natural IMO and a better starting point to work with the image if you wanted to tweak it in post a little. It's not a RAW file most likely a TIFF, so having good highlight exposure it looks great and If you wanted you could putt a bit of the shadows up but I think it looks the best and most properly exposed. The colors also look to be the most accurate. I've never had any issues with my Epson software.

    • @jameshall5556
      @jameshall5556 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yeah. Epson scan looks the best here.

    • @mapletree736
      @mapletree736 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I agree I was confused every time he said it was ass and the worst

    • @totskieranque9325
      @totskieranque9325 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      😊

    • @totskieranque9325
      @totskieranque9325 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      😊😊 3:11

  • @kai9_long
    @kai9_long 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    this officially becomes my new favorite ASMR channel

  • @ryangordon5491
    @ryangordon5491 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Casually throws a sick parallax on the last shot. Well done sir.

  • @ewi2772
    @ewi2772 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I’m in love with your channel, is like watching standup comedy with photography

  • @tyrrellmentoor4733
    @tyrrellmentoor4733 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Been waiting for another upload

  • @jayextarys8616
    @jayextarys8616 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Getting a V600 to scan paper photos and slides. Thanks so much for this amazing video, it gives me a good idea - I tend to prefer the SilverFast scan.

  • @avtoportret
    @avtoportret 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    not only hilarious, not only educational, but also simply well made video

  • @Decco6306
    @Decco6306 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Your commentary is god-like, keep it up, I love it

  • @aarongatewood1224
    @aarongatewood1224 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Subscribed because your personality is hilarious!! Thanks for the comparison!

  • @garciaomar0203
    @garciaomar0203 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    What did you use to scan the positives for negative lab pro? Epson or silverfast? I get different results when scanning from either.

  • @HouseOfHorusWorld
    @HouseOfHorusWorld 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video, love the comparisons!

  • @AeromaticXD
    @AeromaticXD 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Ahhh a grainydays upload means a good day

  • @josephstitt137
    @josephstitt137 4 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    I use Epson scan just because it came with the scanner and one of the most impressive things about the software is how it removes the magenta shift from expired slide film and gives a pretty usable image. Would be interested in how the other software alternatives would handle expired slide film.

    • @pilsplease7561
      @pilsplease7561 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Silverfast gets weird. Ive had issues with it.

  • @hewhotellsastory
    @hewhotellsastory 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for bringing back a memory 1:20 I can recall the funeral pyres just a little farther down the river.

  • @marekkovac7058
    @marekkovac7058 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks a lot for comparison, as for the example images you shown, I liked silverfast the most, personal preference I guess.
    Did you measure the time it takes to scan for epson vs silverfast (with/without ICE) ?

  • @megzjr
    @megzjr 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Man you are so damn funny 😂 i enjoy how bored/sarcastic you are all the time .. and great content as always

  • @Barzyz01
    @Barzyz01 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent blend of science, color and humor. Prost!!!

  • @JacobCarlson
    @JacobCarlson 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Just curious, did you use Epson Scan or Silverfast to scan the negatives you used in Negative Lab Pro?

  • @aristoioannidis7490
    @aristoioannidis7490 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for your assessment. Much appreciated. For me the Epson solution hit the mark.

  • @antoinedbf4307
    @antoinedbf4307 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video ! i've been fighting with my scans forever.

  • @2thirty9
    @2thirty9 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I’d be interested in your Negative Lab settings and a bit more workflow if you feel like sharing! Do you always keep the basic profile, change them up occasionally, select your film or go with the newer neutral/cool/warm color adjustments? Negative Lab pro has been amazing for me mostly and abysmal sometimes, but I probably need to re-work on my workflow. (Or some of my negs are crap maybe)
    Also your videos are awesome. That is all.

  • @MB-or8js
    @MB-or8js 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Did you adjust your frame holders in your V700 scanner for the optimum height? Maximum scanner sharpness is a few mm above the scanner glass. Makes a huge difference in picture sharpness! I find the Epson scan surface too dark in results, I am using currently SilverFast 8.

  • @mikemassa6143
    @mikemassa6143 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very funny video and very detailed! Thanks for the info!

  • @gilpineda
    @gilpineda 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I see grainydays on my push notifs, I click

  • @jjuarez83
    @jjuarez83 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The nice thing about the V700 is you can use the wet mount scan process to get better results from your film scans. If you have Silverfast there is a option to crossgrade your license at a discount. These flatbeds are great for medium / large format film not so great for 35mm. Silverfast does some interesting scanning at different setting to give you a better dynamic range. I don't scan much at home anymore because it just takes too long and I never been able to match results from pro labs with skilled film scanner operators (except for Black and White, I can get just as good or better black and white scans at home).

  • @mikeackYT
    @mikeackYT 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video! Only thing I would suggest is that NLP does do some weird blue hue casts. I have since been scanning my film with VuScan as DWGs and then using NLP on those and I haven't had the issue since. Maybe something to test out? NPL has an option to pick your film brand but not stock as well.

  • @salmahlizerd
    @salmahlizerd 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Earned a subscriber purely in your wit, great video.

  • @jeromestolly1178
    @jeromestolly1178 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm glad I'm not the only one who gets crazy blue Skys with Negative Lab Pro. I thought maybe I was developing wrong or over agitating. Glad to see it isn't me! Where did you get that 4 strip negative holder? And will that work with the epson v600?

  • @Perryk
    @Perryk 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Have you tried VueScan? Using the Nikon Coolscan 9000 and SilverFast, I would get red lines all over the image.

  • @idreaminsurfgreen5327
    @idreaminsurfgreen5327 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I am so pumped to watch this! Just switched from Epson Scan to Siverfast. HELP!

  • @Strawbsmedia
    @Strawbsmedia 4 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    the last time i was this early we weren't living through a historical pandemic

    • @m93sek
      @m93sek 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      the last time it was mentioned it wasn't original already

  • @wordsrmusic
    @wordsrmusic 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Keep the salty humor going, it's gold!

  • @jacksonjacksonnguyen
    @jacksonjacksonnguyen 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I really enjoyed this video and your humor 😆😭😂

  • @nino8344
    @nino8344 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    That motel picture with Cinestill was dope!!

  • @rf8221
    @rf8221 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    How did you change the turquoise color cast from the NLP?

  • @woohoo0237
    @woohoo0237 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    the video that i needddddd!!! thank youuu!

  • @raghebabunahla115
    @raghebabunahla115 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Amazing. You're amazing. Thank you.

  • @MinTieS.
    @MinTieS. 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Jason looking fresh AF!

  • @bryanbernart
    @bryanbernart 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you, I really get a kick out of your videos.

  • @tobiasx8312
    @tobiasx8312 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice comparison, but how do you scan the negatives for Negative Lab Pro?

  • @annie_on_film
    @annie_on_film 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    ahh Jason... the antithesis of the photography avengers... and a breath of fresh air!

  • @user-ux5hp6vp2t
    @user-ux5hp6vp2t 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Like, great editing. Dude.

  • @paoloportillo7700
    @paoloportillo7700 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    not sure if this applies to the v700 but Silverfast is actually given free if you register your scanner to the epson website. Reason being that the iSRD isnt functional in the Epson Scan software 2. Used it on my v600

  • @calvinwu3861
    @calvinwu3861 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video. I really like it!

  • @NicholasSmithPolygonsPixels
    @NicholasSmithPolygonsPixels 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I use silverfast, but only because it came free with the scanner I bought. However I think I read an article somewhere that epson scan’s details are a bit soft in comparison to silverfast. Not sure if you’ve noticed yourself?

  • @SashaOnyshchenko
    @SashaOnyshchenko 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Would love to know which software you use to scan your negatives as positives before importing to LR?

  • @raycoyleiv
    @raycoyleiv 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Always can make me laugh - love that

  • @ramseymellette3169
    @ramseymellette3169 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great video! I'm now subscribed!

  • @ronwolfept
    @ronwolfept 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    nice job on the comparison and the edit on this video

  • @toulcaz31
    @toulcaz31 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    You didn’t mention the lack of ICE for Negative Lab Pro which adds to the processing length. Have you done manual inversions in Photoshop? It’s not too hard and would have been a great 4th comparison. Maybe a follow-up video?

  • @helgebrekke
    @helgebrekke 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks!
    I went all in and bought the Epson V850Pro some weeks ago, mainly for braggin' rights, but it comes with Silverfast SE 8 included for free (cause the scanner is hella expensive), and I've just been using that so far. I have, though, realised how much difference a few adjustments can do to to the output of the scan. Also, the iSDR (iRDS? iSRD?) for colour negatives is AMAZING at removing all that dust that otherwise would make my life a living hell.

    • @helgebrekke
      @helgebrekke 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Also, the thanks was for a break in the monotony of lockdown and the sound of my scanner whirring away at my backlog of negatives.

  • @sharonchisanga4469
    @sharonchisanga4469 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    We would love to have that here in Zambia.❤❤ It's really good have loved them all.

  • @brvnos
    @brvnos 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    It seems all of them needed a little correction, but only one is free. Love your videos, man.

  • @mijoru
    @mijoru 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Any tips on where to purchase some C41 developer kits? B&H is sold out of the mainstream kits that are reasonably priced

  • @lukasbusse2793
    @lukasbusse2793 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    you can achieve NLP-conversions without the turquoise blue tones, if you digitize as a RAW DNG, either with Silverfast (a version which allows it) or with Vuescan which can also use infrared dust removal. but for your route via Tiff I highly recommend using the Tiff-Preparation tool which comes with NLP. It will change the tiffs gamma to a value (2.2) from which NLP will work much better.

  • @richardstollar4291
    @richardstollar4291 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I looked at NLP but found the fact that you're dealing with a positive that's transformed confusing as all the sliders are backwards and the wrong-way-round. For example, the shadows slider actually affects the highlights because it works on the negative shadows. How do you handle that?

  • @DozierGraphic
    @DozierGraphic 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    you're the shit! this and all your other videos incredibly helpful! Thanks!

  • @depotmsa2362
    @depotmsa2362 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    i love your dark humour

  • @bene681
    @bene681 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Have you heard about the film negative converter in rawtherapee? Its free and I'm too cheap to buy some software thats worth more than the old scanner I have

  • @alexmoliname
    @alexmoliname 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    This was awesome.

  • @ForgottenTasmania
    @ForgottenTasmania 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I like the results from Silverfast but it’s the program I love to hate. Most unfriendly interface, but useable if you buy the third party manual. I’m currently trying NLP as the interface is very nice and it fits into my LR workflow without the export, import hack to fix backwards controls in LR when photographing negatives. It’s just so good to see new products in this space and your review was a giggle. Thank you.

  • @LAR1945
    @LAR1945 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    you are just soooo engaging. And smart..

  • @DanRegueira
    @DanRegueira 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    were you using epson or silverfast to scan the positive of the negative for negative lab pro? You had to use something

  • @bradvincet1848
    @bradvincet1848 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Are the more expensive epson scanners worth the upgrade or is the software more important? Just getting started in digitizing old family photo albums.

  • @hakkimaziz
    @hakkimaziz 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I just subscribed cause you're a funny person!

  • @Tsudkyk
    @Tsudkyk 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I really love the results I get with my epson, they scans are flat but it retains details in the shadows and highlights but it takes some work in Lightroom to correct the contrast and mid tones.
    I’m impressed with what Ive seen from silverfast and I’m curious about negative lab pro.

  • @zachminawi
    @zachminawi 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    bro.... why are you so funny? ahah! Thank you for all your great videos :D

  • @JL-vk1rs
    @JL-vk1rs ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi can I ask which "film profile" you used for the cinestill and silverfast combo? I have silverfast but it has no cinestill option

  • @danielklingenstein4203
    @danielklingenstein4203 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hey I know this video is old but how are you getting such good resolution out of your epson? I have a V600 and all of my scans look like a gen1 digital point and shoot. Any suggestions?

  • @justinpatterson4164
    @justinpatterson4164 4 ปีที่แล้ว +31

    The Silverfast defaults looked so good!

    • @jjuarez83
      @jjuarez83 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Agree. Though I get a feeling he was just using defaults and not doing anything really custom.

    • @HungUpOnADream1122
      @HungUpOnADream1122 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Jose Juarez That was the point of the video, comparing their default results without editing them. It is to show people what the program does itself, not with the user.

    • @TheEmptyMayoJar
      @TheEmptyMayoJar 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      It could just be me, but my silverfast doesnt have a cinestill default... does anyone know if there is one?

    • @JasonZakrajsek
      @JasonZakrajsek 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@jjuarez83 you should get that feeling because he explicitly said it’s few times.

  • @Theincrediblespud
    @Theincrediblespud 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Where was the picture at 4:31 taken? It looks beautiful

  • @dannyvalentine8439
    @dannyvalentine8439 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Dude this video made my day.. LOL!

  • @bqfilms
    @bqfilms 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I like the new angle for the commentary, your baby face can be greatly appreciated now.

  • @Mickaelplqn
    @Mickaelplqn 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    how do you correct blue sky in neglabpro ?!

  • @Migi467
    @Migi467 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    so good

  • @mtothej43
    @mtothej43 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Instant subscribe after listening to 10 seconds of you chatting

  • @CHGroups
    @CHGroups 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Çox sağol önəmli məlumatlar üçün! Thank you bro!

  • @dee.other.artist8091
    @dee.other.artist8091 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Which Negafix settings did you use for CineStill 800?