Napoleon -- sure the grouchy reinforcements will save the situation. Marchals-- my emperor grouchy is fallowing your orders and will not join the battle but pursue the prussians Napoleon--- Der Angriff Steiner war ein Befehl! Wer sind Sie, dass Sie es wagen, sich meinen Befehlen zu widersetzen? So weit ist es also gekommen. Das Militär hat mich belogen!
I love how the one guy carried it from the case like it was an armed nuclear warhead, then Big Dave McSpadehands just stuffed it in the foam box like his spare boxer shorts
Uhh.. apparently because it's now an antique item and that the hat survived more than 2 centuries which was apparently from Napoleon's belongings.. and we definitely don't want it to break, scratch or anything. To preserved it
The hat is hideous. I would want to sell it ASAP. Looking at it disgusts me. Napoopleon ruineed Europe by liberalism from which communism and feminism have fed, plus atheism, all of which are cancers that ruin the world more than it already is.
@@moredistractions Damn, what a waste. No offence to your effort but i guess the Samurai family and their descent seems to not bother changing those silk strap.
@@mincedbeef8936 It can. But it’s often used to refer to death, so that’s why I motioned that it must’ve been used figuratively though the intent was lost in execution considering how it could’ve been misinterpreted.
LOL. Came here to comment on the stuffing. Someone designed that case with perfectly formed foam padding, but didn’t account for how the hat could be inserted gently.
*0:05* that red dot that shows up on his forehead as soon as he touches the hat make it look like the defenses of the museum kicked in, locked a laser sight onto his head, and were about to blow him away.
The hat which French Emperor Napoleon Bonaparte wore during the Battle of Waterloo is on its way back to the battlefield which saw his demise. The two-cornered, or bicorne hat, is normally kept in a museum in Sens in east of Paris. It was the one Napoleon wore on June 18th, 1815 when he was defeated by the British forces commanded by the Duke of Wellington and General Von Blücher’s Prussian army. Specialised transporters prepared tailor-made boxes to take the precious hat to Wellington Museum in the Belgian town of Waterloo where it will stay for four months. “This one is the last one he wore because it's the one he had during the Battle of Waterloo. And, as it was a rainy day, it changed its shape and you can still see traces on the front of raindrops which tell us about the rain which was falling from the Belgian sky.” One of the emperor's uniforms was also sent to Waterloo ahead of the bicentenary commemorations. Napoleon, initially defeated in 1813, had escaped exile in the Mediterranean island of Elba and returned to power for a period now called the Hundred Days. After Waterloo, he was confined on the Atlantic island of Saint Helena until his death in 1821. Difficult words: demise (failure), trace (a small sign of something), bicentenary (the day or year exactly 200 years after an important event), confine (to imprison). Read more: www.newsinlevels.com/products/two-hundred-years-after-the-battle-of-waterloo-level-3/
People need to stop acting like the British defeated Napoleon by themselves, they had help! If the United States didn't come to the British aid in WW2 , they would be speaking German now!
@@Garouu23 Yes and they made copies of it and Jean-François Champollion was the first in 2000 years to decrypt the ancient hieroglyphs and is the founding father of Egyptology.
Как он величайших убица милион людей потом его Россия по жопе дала всю французскую армию изгнали 1812году и также Гитлера1945г))историю читайте...как ваша сейчас Европейские политики надоели нечего не поменялись все также повторяется не дай бог 😇🙏👼
@@rogueace4115: His family and his lineage is Italian. Dig deeper, look closer. It´s pretty much glazed over and ignored but it´s true. The name Napoleone is French, literally translatable to meaning ¨person from Naples¨. The name of Bonaparte is an Italian surname. It derives from Italian bona (buona) 'good' and parte 'solution' or 'match' (a name bestowed as an expression of satisfaction at a newborn's arrival).
Wrong, he was not defeated by the British Forces. It was the combined forces with the Prussians that led to his loss at Waterloo. Even Wellington admitted that, if the Prussians had not arrived when they did, he was in trouble.
@@JJaqn05 yes but. Also historians said that there was a 100 percent chance that wellington would have been defeated at Waterloo without Blucher's assistant's his 68.000 men would have been dead.
*I find it amazing that morons like yourself would consider a man that was directly responsible for the deaths of up to 3 million people plus untold numbers of civilians who suffered well documented massacres at the hands of the French Armies as they crossed into Prussia, Russia and Spain...would hold Napoleon up as some kind of hero. GET YOURSELF AN EDUCATION*.
@@valenalfredlintao3020 He abdicated in 1814 at first, then returned to the mainland in 1815 for the 100 days. He was originally defeated and forced to abdicate in 1814, which is what they are actually discussing in the video (Watch it), and wrongfully date to 1813.
The Prussians arrived late to the battle, the battle was nearly over by the time the Prussians arrived. Lets not forget that even the dutch king William II was a BRITISH SOLDIER who joined the british army at age 19.
@@shrek13241 Of Wellington's 68,000 troops only 25,000 of the were actually from the UK and about a 1/3 of those were raw Irish recruits. As quiet a few of the professional British troops were still not back from North America as they had been sent there to fight the US (war of 1812) after the end of the 6th coalition/Peninsular war. At Waterloo there were 26,000 German troops from Hannover, Brunswick and Nassau (Including the KGL) and 17,000 troops from the Netherlands. Including Blücher's 50,000 troops that gives you approximately 30% troops being from the UK. Blücher's army arrived around 4:00pm and played a decisive role no question. Von Bülow's attack around Plancenoit forced the French to split their army onto two fronts which sucked in many units of the Old Guard. Prior to his arrival, the KGL and Nassauer troops had lost La Haye Sainte and Napoleon's artillery was blasting the tightly packed Allied formations on the Mont St Jean Ridge to shreds.Wellington said famously at this stage of the battle "give me night or the Prussians". The battle ended around 8pm, which is 4 hours after the Prussians arrived in full force, which I wouldn't consider to be 'late to the battle". The Prussians alone pursued the retreating French until 10pm to prevent them from re organising. Wellington's troops didn't participate in the pursuit as obviously they were worn out as they had been fighting for longer since 11:30am.
@@nuttygeezer708 "Blücher's army arrived around 4:00pm and played a decisive role no question" Yes they did. But without the British-allied army that was led by Wellington the Prussians would have stood no chance.
@@JJaqn05 Just as the British army led by Wellington would have had no chance without the arrival of the Prussians, let us not forget that they were losing... "Give me the night or Blucher" said Wellington in despair.
Well, the real hat is in the german museum in Berlin....Napoleon lost it during the retreat when his carriage was captured during the night after the battle.
Maybe the Germans and the French should have a battle to decide which nation has the real bicorn. IMO, the true hat will be that which has more use or wear evident.
the french Empereur Napoleon was defeated by a coalition of belgians, dutch, british, prussians, brunswick etc....the british were far from being the majority.. do not distort history !
So it was a victory for all of them. No one is distorting history. You are just misinterpreting what they are saying because you do not fully understand English.
@@JJaqn05 wellintong has always refused to fight napoleon live (spain) more in waterloo wellinton's army was not composed only of British. It is true that any historian admits that if the Prussians had not arrived at Waterloo, Wellinton would have been destroyed
@@pascalplantagenet4802 "It is true that any historian admits that if the Prussians had not arrived at Waterloo, Wellinton would have been destroyed" no historian has ever said that. What every historian has claimed tho is that without Wellingtons army the Prussians and Blucher would have never confronted Napoleon. And if he did alone he would have been utterly crushed. He needed Wellingtons army. It's well known that it was the Duke of Wellington who defeated Napoleon in battle. And the Prussians came in late. Remember it was Wellingtons army who fought Napoleon for most of the battle. Plantagenet
@@wimziekman1104 After you read the book The Wars Against Napoleon: Debunking the Myth of the Napoleonic Wars by Michel Franceschi we will talk again ok. Than you know the true history.
@@missstarbuck You dn't know the true history. After you read The Protocols of The Learned Elders of Zion, then we'll talk if God permits, ok? Then you can know the true history.
M.T.G Reminiscing on the reflections of Wellington in his later years complaining of the cost of administering post war France, the slowdown of reform and industry with the lack of the competition that Napoleon gave. And the distancing of the European powers of the coalition once the uniting factor of a common enemy was gone. The common people and intellectuals saw it as a win for the establishment and an end to the revolution.
I think the so called mini-ice age, was a factor to post war economic woes. The populations were growing and yields were going down. Fortunately it didnt last that long.
Wasn’t the last bicorne he wore, god the inaccuracies in this video are unreal, he took 2-3 bicornes with him, didn’t “meet his demise” at Waterloo, he lost the battle, and fled on horseback attempting to gain another army later down the line, failed, and then got exiled.
He wasn't defeated by only by British forces, numbers are: Brits commanded allies 68.000 (only 36 percent of them are British) AND Prussians 45.000. While Napoleon is only had 72.000. Napoleon defeated by numbers.
Without masonic collusion, Napoopleon would have had no string of victories. The lapdog of the Jews was a useful tool, but still, in the end, just a pawn. Mainstream history is like a PG Disney version of a Grimm tale. Real "cute."
Wellington said it himself, "If Blucher won't arrive in 2 hours, We have to retreat" At Waterloo, Napoleon's front divisions captured the village and opened artillery on Wellington's square formation. The Duke's first division was broken apart
0:06 Napoleon Bonaparte didin't die in a battle. He died on the island of Saint Helena after loosing the battle of Waterloo. He died in 1821, the battle of Waterloo ended in 1815. he was defeated by the brits, and then exiled on the island of Saint Helena.
Defeated by the British? The British made up less than a quarter of the Army opposing the French. It was the Prussians that turned the tide of the Battle.
Those were much more civilized times then now. War was regulated to fields typical distanced from civilian populations, almost like a sporting match except some or a lot of the players died. Even the Uniforms were much more elegant then what is worn now by a say US army General which is not distingued from a private or enlisted man/woman.
***** I knew I would get a comment like yours. The fact is a set piece battle say like Waterloo is nothing like say the bombing of Dresden with 200,000 people, mostly civilians killed or a technical massacre like Hiroshima. Yes compared to that...55 million killed in WW2, much more civilized.
valhala56 I understand what you are saying about standard formation battles but there were plenty of civilian massacres in war prior to the 20th Century- Genghis Khans Campaigns, Viking Raids on Britain, Ottoman Atrocities, The Siege of Magdeburg in the 30 Years War, The Sacking of Bolton in the Wars of the Three Kingdoms, Oceans of civilian blood in ancient Chinese conflicts.... it goes on and on...
Nathan Hazlett Yes that is true but even Ghengis Kahn couldn't kill 100,000 people with one bomb. Now humans can easily kill One million people with one bomb. There are enough nuclear weapons on the planet now to kill everybody, Attila the Hun could only dream of such a nightmare.
That was the case in theory Valhala but the reality was very different. Many conquered towns and cities were ravaged by French forces. Unless you peacefully surrendered and made no opposition to them. Which is not that different to warfare of other ages including modern times.
BVargas78 I'm not going to argue that, however when the machine gun turned up on the battlefield that turned war into industrial level carnage. When one machine gun on the Somme could mow down hundreds and several machine gun nests could kill thousands on an industrial scale, there were single battles in WW1 that would have a million casulties on both sides. Then the Germans brought in chemical warfare and WW2 large scale bombing of Civilians, Dresden alone 200,000 killed in one awfull night by the Brits. This new level of warfare makes 18th century warfare look like football matches.
''... by the rain in Belgium that fell from the sky...' I guess it could have fell from somewhere else just like the hat. I am so glad that no one found Hitler's hat
@@renatovonschumacher3511 stfu nazi you don't think a german as any say in who is close to Hitler especially Bismarck the one that provoked ww1 and ww2 in the end
Yeah hey.. do they make these in tinfoil? Like cake-pans and stuff? One could order a few dozen, right, for all one's friends. "Sweets for the sweet, I always say. Here, have this genuine tinfoil Napoleon Bonaparte hat. It'll match that gold-lated nutcase we gave you last year."
All kudos to the Duke, but let's remember it was a British-ALLIED force that won the day in those Belgian fields. The Kings German Legion, for example, was an exemplary unit.
@@MikeB071 Interesting how the poor Engineer officer charged with creating the Waterloo model years later got in trouble for accurately showing the strong Prussian support.
@@jeb1413 Never denied that. He was close. But that doesn't matter. He had to pull out because his army run away and he could no nothing else. The British destroyed his old guard and the Prussians also pressured him
The British take all the glory from the Battle of Waterloo against Napoleon like the Roman take all the glory from the battle of catalaunian plains against Attila
Imagine what the hat heard,saw and learned from napoleon strategies
it perhaps did and became big headed ! , and yes amazing it would be , history captured for eternity .
Plot twist: the hat is marching on Paris gathering an army and challenging the world!
Napoleon -- sure the grouchy reinforcements will save the situation.
Marchals-- my emperor grouchy is fallowing your orders and will not join the battle but pursue the prussians
Napoleon--- Der Angriff Steiner war ein Befehl! Wer sind Sie, dass Sie es wagen, sich meinen Befehlen zu widersetzen? So weit ist es also gekommen. Das Militär hat mich belogen!
nothing because its not a living bean
@@moredistractions nobody cares about some french hat
I love how the one guy carried it from the case like it was an armed nuclear warhead, then Big Dave McSpadehands just stuffed it in the foam box like his spare boxer shorts
Uhh.. apparently because it's now an antique item and that the hat survived more than 2 centuries which was apparently from Napoleon's belongings.. and we definitely don't want it to break, scratch or anything. To preserved it
dude its just a hat its not that important
@@masternobody1896 you're not that important
The hat is hideous. I would want to sell it ASAP. Looking at it disgusts me. Napoopleon ruineed Europe by liberalism from which communism and feminism have fed, plus atheism, all of which are cancers that ruin the world more than it already is.
@@masternobody1896 giga pussy
The guy putting the hat in the foam sure was not being very careful with it. Basically was stuffing it in.
I was thinking the same.Pity they could'nt have put the battle back a few years would have been great to have some pics.
Had the same impression. Was shocked, as I saw the guy´s rough handling of the very old hat.
With gritty teeth and a heart full of determenition and heavy hands we finally got it safely stuffed in its safety carry box.
Napoleon got stuffed the day he wore it as well. Oh!, there's irony in there somewhere.
@@moredistractions Damn, what a waste. No offence to your effort but i guess the Samurai family and their descent seems to not bother changing those silk strap.
Demise? I hope they mean figuratively or as in “demise of his rule” cuz Napoleon didn’t die at Waterloo. He was exiled.
I thought the same thing, they really made it sound like he died at the battle.
demise also means failure
@@mincedbeef8936
It can. But it’s often used to refer to death, so that’s why I motioned that it must’ve been used figuratively though the intent was lost in execution considering how it could’ve been misinterpreted.
LOL. Came here to comment on the stuffing. Someone designed that case with perfectly formed foam padding, but didn’t account for how the hat could be inserted gently.
@@henrylivingstone2971 Demise almost never means death. It means his failiure. The only one who misinterpreted it is you. Are you French?
*0:05* that red dot that shows up on his forehead as soon as he touches the hat make it look like the defenses of the museum kicked in, locked a laser sight onto his head, and were about to blow him away.
The hat which French Emperor Napoleon Bonaparte wore during the Battle of Waterloo is on its way back to the battlefield which saw his demise.
The two-cornered, or bicorne hat, is normally kept in a museum in Sens in east of Paris.
It was the one Napoleon wore on June 18th, 1815 when he was defeated by the British forces commanded by the Duke of Wellington and General Von Blücher’s Prussian army.
Specialised transporters prepared tailor-made boxes to take the precious hat to Wellington Museum in the Belgian town of Waterloo where it will stay for four months.
“This one is the last one he wore because it's the one he had during the Battle of Waterloo. And, as it was a rainy day, it changed its shape and you can still see traces on the front of raindrops which tell us about the rain which was falling from the Belgian sky.”
One of the emperor's uniforms was also sent to Waterloo ahead of the bicentenary commemorations.
Napoleon, initially defeated in 1813, had escaped exile in the Mediterranean island of Elba and returned to power for a period now called the Hundred Days. After Waterloo, he was confined on the Atlantic island of Saint Helena until his death in 1821.
Difficult words: demise (failure), trace (a small sign of something), bicentenary (the day or year exactly 200 years after an important event), confine (to imprison).
Read more: www.newsinlevels.com/products/two-hundred-years-after-the-battle-of-waterloo-level-3/
He also wore his hat and uniform while he was at St Helena. I guess they were brought back to France after his death.
@@DavBlc7
I hope so, considering his body was brought back to France and buried at Les Invalids.
What's with the middle school English book gimmick?
People need to stop acting like the British defeated Napoleon by themselves, they had help! If the United States didn't come to the British aid in WW2 , they would be speaking German now!
Can I ask why you typed out the video?
This hat is like Sauron's ring. If you ever dare to wear it, you start going crazy.
or so intelligent and brave !
😂😂😂😂 As a French I totally approve.
Napoleon hat on the battlefield is worth 40000 men . ( Duke of Wellington ) .💂♂️🇫🇷🇬🇧💂♂️
40,000
But he no gentlemen.
@@JimmyG1776 no just Emperor of great France...
50000
He actually said Napoléon himself not the hat.
Britain: Sure,we'll take the Rosseta Stone!
France:Wanna take Napoleon's hat?
Britain: Um.. you can keep it...
They took Rosetta Stone in Egypt in 1798 wtf your talking about
@@ommsterlitz1805 yes but it was the French who discovered it
@@Garouu23 Yes and they made copies of it and Jean-François Champollion was the first in 2000 years to decrypt the ancient hieroglyphs and is the founding father of Egyptology.
@@ommsterlitz1805 yeah That's what I'm talking about. Champollion was French and the guy who found this stone was a French soldier
@@ommsterlitz1805 Champolliion founded the Egipthology in Torino (Italy)
"careful with the hat" -flicks hat- -shoves in-
well I'm glad it's well made enough to withstand it after all these years
What our eyes are beholding is the hat of the greatest emperor that ever lived. Long may he live, RIP in heaven with the lord
What makes a great emperor ?
You're saying Alexander the Great also wore this hat???
Greatest emperor is kinda debatable
But sure he was the Greatest Military General of all time
vive l’empereur!
Как он величайших убица милион людей потом его Россия по жопе дала всю французскую армию изгнали 1812году и также Гитлера1945г))историю читайте...как ваша сейчас Европейские политики надоели нечего не поменялись все также повторяется не дай бог 😇🙏👼
Napolean was the badass of all badasses.
Gaius Julius Caesar, but at least Napoleone was Italian.
@@jaelge >implying
@@rogueace4115:
What?
@@jaelge I just think your comment was funny, because it implies that Napoléon was Italian which he wasn't
@@rogueace4115:
His family and his lineage is Italian. Dig deeper, look closer. It´s pretty much glazed over and ignored but it´s true.
The name Napoleone is French, literally translatable to meaning ¨person from Naples¨.
The name of Bonaparte is an Italian surname. It derives from Italian bona (buona) 'good' and parte 'solution' or 'match' (a name bestowed as an expression of satisfaction at a newborn's arrival).
Wrong, he was not defeated by the British Forces. It was the combined forces with the Prussians that led to his loss at Waterloo. Even Wellington admitted that, if the Prussians had not arrived when they did, he was in trouble.
they arrived late.
No he would have won without the Prussians
@@JJaqn05 yes but. Also historians said that there was a 100 percent chance that wellington would have been defeated at Waterloo without Blucher's assistant's his 68.000 men would have been dead.
@@AAAA-zc9gz Hippocrates was a physician and do you believe the things he said? Don't be so gullible and stop talking to these historians
@@JJaqn05 READ HISTORY. AND THINK OF WHAT YOURE SAYING. THINK FIRST and don't reply to me until you know what I was trying to even say.
its like a relic. does it give any stats?
Do you play easy tech games
+20 to moral -50 to low supplies
+10 000 moral
+50 000 charisma
+100 000 inteligence
+500 000 military might
- 500 000 luck in your love life
I see no large bullet hole in his hat as depicted in the recent movie 😂
Vive l'Empereur !! Vive Napoléon !! Vive la France !
Vive le chapeau !
*I find it amazing that morons like yourself would consider a man that was directly responsible for the deaths of up to 3 million people plus untold numbers of civilians who suffered well documented massacres at the hands of the French Armies as they crossed into Prussia, Russia and Spain...would hold Napoleon up as some kind of hero. GET YOURSELF AN EDUCATION*.
@@BloodOfYeshuaMessiah also that happened only one time and napoleon ordered to fusillate every rioter
@@BloodOfYeshuaMessiah that's why french people are proud of him dude lmao
@@BloodOfYeshuaMessiah what else did you expect lol
He was defeated in 1814 not 1813!
Lol he was defeated in 1815 not 1814
@@valenalfredlintao3020 He abdicated in 1814 at first, then returned to the mainland in 1815 for the 100 days. He was originally defeated and forced to abdicate in 1814, which is what they are actually discussing in the video (Watch it), and wrongfully date to 1813.
@@JohnsonTheSecond oh
He lost the Battle of Leipzig in 1813 which was the main caus of his retreat and eventual surrender in 1814
@@darkice3267 arguably that was 1812 when his downfall began - We're discussing the actual date of his original downfall
Pretty sure Napoleon had many, many, many hats. Probably had a whole room - just full of hats.
as a wise man once said: "Give me your hat"
If you want to get ahead - get a hat!
........so i can sh^t in it.
British victory? You mean a victory By Wellingtons Allied army and Bluchers Prussians
The Prussians arrived late to the battle, the battle was nearly over by the time the Prussians arrived. Lets not forget that even the dutch king William II was a BRITISH SOLDIER who joined the british army at age 19.
@@shrek13241 Of Wellington's 68,000 troops only 25,000 of the were actually from the UK and about a 1/3 of those were raw Irish recruits. As quiet a few of the professional British troops were still not back from North America as they had been sent there to fight the US (war of 1812) after the end of the 6th coalition/Peninsular war. At Waterloo there were 26,000 German troops from Hannover, Brunswick and Nassau (Including the KGL) and 17,000 troops from the Netherlands. Including Blücher's 50,000 troops that gives you approximately 30% troops being from the UK. Blücher's army arrived around 4:00pm and played a decisive role no question. Von Bülow's attack around Plancenoit forced the French to split their army onto two fronts which sucked in many units of the Old Guard. Prior to his arrival, the KGL and Nassauer troops had lost La Haye Sainte and Napoleon's artillery was blasting the tightly packed Allied formations on the Mont St Jean Ridge to shreds.Wellington said famously at this stage of the battle "give me night or the Prussians". The battle ended around 8pm, which is 4 hours after the Prussians arrived in full force, which I wouldn't consider to be 'late to the battle". The Prussians alone pursued the retreating French until 10pm to prevent them from re organising. Wellington's troops didn't participate in the pursuit as obviously they were worn out as they had been fighting for longer since 11:30am.
@@nuttygeezer708 "Blücher's army arrived around 4:00pm and played a decisive role no question" Yes they did. But without the British-allied army that was led by Wellington the Prussians would have stood no chance.
@@shrek13241 Your people are overrated. See my series "The British Empire Was NOT The Biggest." Only hypocrites count oceans of sand but not oceans.
@@JJaqn05 Just as the British army led by Wellington would have had no chance without the arrival of the Prussians, let us not forget that they were losing... "Give me the night or Blucher" said Wellington in despair.
The guy who put it into the foam needs to get fired
Who ever wrote the script for girl talking needs the do some research as it was 1814 that he abdicated not 1813
God I wanna wear that.
@Floron Armour is much cooler than the flamboyance of this libtard's era.
@floron7777and long live the greatest military leader of all time Napoleon Bonaparte
The times that hat must of been slung across a room and they now treat it as though it is made of fragile glass, get real.....its a hat.
They're just trying their best on preserving the hat and not giving it wear and tear that would be natural to its use
Well, the real hat is in the german museum in Berlin....Napoleon lost it during the retreat when his carriage was captured during the night after the battle.
Maybe the Germans and the French should have a battle to decide which nation has the real bicorn.
IMO, the true hat will be that which has more use or wear evident.
1:06 he was a short man
he was average hight
It is bigger than your country so on your knees.
I always thought it would have more feathers and precious gems.
That's a hat not a crown 🤦♂️
I know it was a joke.
Lol you two....
That hat has curls on each side and I think a narrow rectangle is inside the the body of the hat, it's a classic hat good for any knight templar
Templar spelled F-R-E-E-M-A-S-O-N?
the french Empereur Napoleon was defeated by a coalition of belgians, dutch, british, prussians, brunswick etc....the british were far from being the majority..
do not distort history !
It's a very British thing. Their entire history is a laughable recital of self-glorifying myths.
@@Skanzool How is saying an army led by Wellington beat Napoleon a myth? It's not. It's a fact and you are in denial
So it was a victory for all of them. No one is distorting history. You are just misinterpreting what they are saying because you do not fully understand English.
@@JJaqn05 wellintong has always refused to fight napoleon live (spain) more in waterloo wellinton's army was not composed only of British. It is true that any historian admits that if the Prussians had not arrived at Waterloo, Wellinton would have been destroyed
@@pascalplantagenet4802 "It is true that any historian admits that if the Prussians had not arrived at Waterloo, Wellinton would have been destroyed" no historian has ever said that. What every historian has claimed tho is that without Wellingtons army the Prussians and Blucher would have never confronted Napoleon. And if he did alone he would have been utterly crushed. He needed Wellingtons army. It's well known that it was the Duke of Wellington who defeated Napoleon in battle. And the Prussians came in late. Remember it was Wellingtons army who fought Napoleon for most of the battle. Plantagenet
O i would love to have that hat and the clothes right here... or just hold it... #hugewish
Vive L'empereur !! :D
you admire the one man who is beside some good things also mainly responsible for a lot of deaths.
@@wimziekman1104 After you read the book The Wars Against Napoleon: Debunking the Myth of the Napoleonic Wars
by Michel Franceschi
we will talk again ok.
Than you know the true history.
NO NO NO - VIVENT LES ROIS !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
@@renatovonschumacher3511 no no no ... Vive L'empereur !!
@@missstarbuck You dn't know the true history. After you read The Protocols of The Learned Elders of Zion, then we'll talk if God permits, ok?
Then you can know the true history.
“Bye god how I hate the 21st century”
Daughson Perkins
By God *
And me too !
not his “lucky” hat then ...
If hats could talk the stories this one would tell
No that hat is ashamed of once having covered the head of this ridcule and arrogant man.
The greatest loss in British history was winning at Waterloo.
What do you mean to say by that?
M.T.G Reminiscing on the reflections of Wellington in his later years complaining of the cost of administering post war France, the slowdown of reform and industry with the lack of the competition that Napoleon gave. And the distancing of the European powers of the coalition once the uniting factor of a common enemy was gone.
The common people and intellectuals saw it as a win for the establishment and an end to the revolution.
***** O.k, good answer...
I think the so called mini-ice age, was a factor to post war economic woes. The populations were growing and yields were going down. Fortunately it didnt last that long.
Very true
The narrator stated "demise" of Napoleon at Waterloo, she should have said "defeat".
Napoléon 61 battle only 5 defeat , just Dark soul boss.
Wow I wanna see it in person
So this hat is basically worth 40,000 hats??
Whoever wears it becomes the new French emperor
Wasn’t the last bicorne he wore, god the inaccuracies in this video are unreal, he took 2-3 bicornes with him, didn’t “meet his demise” at Waterloo, he lost the battle, and fled on horseback attempting to gain another army later down the line, failed, and then got exiled.
Life is temporary, drip is forever
He wasn't defeated by only by British forces, numbers are: Brits commanded allies 68.000 (only 36 percent of them are British) AND Prussians 45.000.
While Napoleon is only had 72.000. Napoleon defeated by numbers.
Napoleon fought the majority of his battles with a numerical disadvantage, 1 against two or 1 against three.
They literally mentioned the Prussians under blücher at the start of the video...
Without the prussian cavalry, Wellington would have lost the battle of waterloo
Without masonic collusion, Napoopleon would have had no string of victories. The lapdog of the Jews was a useful tool, but still, in the end, just a pawn. Mainstream history is like a PG Disney version of a Grimm tale. Real "cute."
Wellington said it himself,
"If Blucher won't arrive in 2 hours, We have to retreat"
At Waterloo, Napoleon's front divisions captured the village and opened artillery on Wellington's square formation. The Duke's first division was broken apart
@@scintillam_dei?
@@malopephasha5341 My series "The British Empire Was NOT The Biggest" explains how Napoopleon was just a pawn of Jews.
And d'ont forget that Napoléon fight waterlooo without 30 000 men!
Dude hold it like it's a warhead ticking.
0:06 Napoleon Bonaparte didin't die in a battle. He died on the island of Saint Helena after loosing the battle of Waterloo. He died in 1821, the battle of Waterloo ended in 1815. he was defeated by the brits, and then exiled on the island of Saint Helena.
She was talking about the demise of Napoleon's empire
Defeated by Brit and Prussian xd
@@alexiscoppola535 DUDE THAT COMMENT WAS 2 YEARS AGO LOL
This should belong to the UK, by right, and we should be able to wear it.
🫤
non
GRYFFINDOR !
But can this hat correctly choose if your Gryffindor or Hufflepuff?
The foam in the box should of been cut out more so it could just comfortably fit down inside. It's not rocket science.
Defeated by the British? The British made up less than a quarter of the Army opposing the French. It was the Prussians that turned the tide of the Battle.
True. What we should say is the Dutch/ and Hanoverians were getting beaten until the Prussians showed up late and saved their asses.
what a cool hat. i wonder if there's an unusual version
Richard Sharpe saw that hat…
0:36. Be more careful, please!!...""😬🙆
I know I got a little nervous there too.
Boney's hat and nosey's honk on exhibition, now, that would draw in the punters.
Those were much more civilized times then now. War was regulated to fields typical distanced from civilian populations, almost like a sporting match except some or a lot of the players died. Even the Uniforms were much more elegant then what is worn now by a say US army General which is not distingued from a private or enlisted man/woman.
***** I knew I would get a comment like yours. The fact is a set piece battle say like Waterloo is nothing like say the bombing of Dresden with 200,000 people, mostly civilians killed or a technical massacre like Hiroshima.
Yes compared to that...55 million killed in WW2, much more civilized.
valhala56
I understand what you are saying about standard formation battles but there were plenty of civilian massacres in war prior to the 20th Century- Genghis Khans Campaigns, Viking Raids on Britain, Ottoman Atrocities, The Siege of Magdeburg in the 30 Years War, The Sacking of Bolton in the Wars of the Three Kingdoms, Oceans of civilian blood in ancient Chinese conflicts.... it goes on and on...
Nathan Hazlett Yes that is true but even Ghengis Kahn couldn't kill 100,000 people with one bomb. Now humans can easily kill One million people with one bomb. There are enough nuclear weapons on the planet now to kill everybody, Attila the Hun could only dream of such a nightmare.
That was the case in theory Valhala but the reality was very different. Many conquered towns and cities were ravaged by French forces. Unless you peacefully surrendered and made no opposition to them. Which is not that different to warfare of other ages including modern times.
BVargas78 I'm not going to argue that, however when the machine gun turned up on the battlefield that turned war into industrial level carnage. When one machine gun on the Somme could mow down hundreds and several machine gun nests could kill thousands on an industrial scale, there were single battles in WW1 that would have a million casulties on both sides. Then the Germans brought in chemical warfare and WW2 large scale bombing of Civilians, Dresden alone 200,000 killed in one awfull night by the Brits.
This new level of warfare makes 18th century warfare look like football matches.
Add an exhebit of the Duck of Wellington's famous hooter and game on .
is it coincidental that this video comes up in my featured just as I finsihed my project onNapoleon bonaprte
Which museum does this hat rest now? (01/07/22 7:20pm)
''... by the rain in Belgium that fell from the sky...' I guess it could have fell from somewhere else just like the hat. I am so glad that no one found Hitler's hat
Bismarck is close to Hitler, Napoleon isn't
@@ommsterlitz1805 Napoleon is close. Bismarck not at all.
@@renatovonschumacher3511 stfu nazi you don't think a german as any say in who is close to Hitler especially Bismarck the one that provoked ww1 and ww2 in the end
@@ommsterlitz1805 You are a simpleton. No idea about history but a big mouth.
@@ommsterlitz1805 Bismarck did NOT provoke WWI. Quite on the contrary. If someone then it was Caprivi.
worth millions of dollars and is the equivalent of 50,000 men on the battlefield
My glories hat.
He puts so much effort into handling it carefully then just bonks it anyways 00:35
That is what I thought too.
@@renatovonschumacher3511it’s fabric it won’t break that’s why i assume
How much do you think it would cost? Probably millions...
look for his hair inside it and use it to genetically replicate him and send the world into chaos again
I mean other than treating it like a bomb atleast they wore glothes
damn! i was wondering where i left it.
I wish that Napoleon had won for it would have been a far better world
You must be joking.
@@renatovonschumacher3511 bah il n'y aurait pas eu les 2 guerres mondiales et la guerre froide dans son scénario.
@@waardlafrance110 Mais les catastrophes du 20e siècle ont été une conséquence directe.
Vive L'empereur!!! :-)
The real hat...how would they even know that for sure...??
the dude that put it inside the box, dont know how to handle fragil artefacts
Yeah hey.. do they make these in tinfoil? Like cake-pans and stuff? One could order a few dozen, right, for all one's friends. "Sweets for the sweet, I always say. Here, have this genuine tinfoil Napoleon Bonaparte hat. It'll match that gold-lated nutcase we gave you last year."
I watching this video while eating bred
What proof do they provide of authenticity???
Huh. No hole..
ThE pReSiOs HaT every hat in the early 18 hundreds looked like that
Where he is right now
Wisbech
" ho my god ! oh my god ! ô my gooooood ! ! ! "
Information correction it was the battle of Leipzig or the battle of the Nations, that ultimately sealed the fate of Napoleon, not Waterloo
He didn't die at Waterloo btw ODN
France the army the head of the army Josephine!
There's nothing we can do
Where's the hat he wore at Austerlitz?
Kylie would look good in that.
If the hat fit …wear it.
Treats it like a holy relic then stuffs it into a box. Must’ve thought the cameras were off.
How typically French.
Essa derrota de Napoleâo 1815 Waterlo ele se debandou do campo de Batalha,fugindo deixou chapeu cair..? E isso eles dizem..
Oh dear! Did it fall off when he did a runner??
All kudos to the Duke, but let's remember it was a British-ALLIED force that won the day in those Belgian fields. The Kings German Legion, for example, was an exemplary unit.
Not to mention Blucher and his Prussians...
@@MikeB071 Interesting how the poor Engineer officer charged with creating the Waterloo model years later got in trouble for accurately showing the strong Prussian support.
It was a WELLINGTON led force. So a big victory for us because it was a Brit who was in charge of the army. And you fail to admit that
@@JJaqn05 the french were close to win Waterloo Napoleon had to pull out because of the prussian
@@jeb1413 Never denied that. He was close. But that doesn't matter. He had to pull out because his army run away and he could no nothing else. The British destroyed his old guard and the Prussians also pressured him
How much is it?
Prot07ype there was one of his hats sold for 1.8 million €, but I don’t know about this one...
I want it.
Prot07ype yeah me too man. I feel you...
Prot07ype same bruv
Am I the only one that wants to see Napoleon's tomb opened?
How did the Battle of Waterloo "See his demise"? Demise means Death. Napoleon did not die at Waterloo.
Demise can also mean failure.
Demise does mean death but it also means abdication, which means losing a throne or duty.
The British take all the glory from the Battle of Waterloo against Napoleon like the Roman take all the glory from the battle of catalaunian plains against Attila
Do we? As far as I am aware we Brits always acknowledge the Prussian contribution in this battle.
maybe not you but lot yes @@ryanmcgowan417
They're handling it as if it'll explode.
I say too..
a hat which is more than 250 years old is very very vulnerable yes. So it is great that they handle it like that.
It's 202 years.
Marticus
Of course they have to be very careful, that is a national treasure
it’s not only 250 years old, but also worth millions
Tres. Bien
I. Want. That. Hat.
what happened to this hat after the battle?
KEEP IT IN THE MUSEUM🗣️🔥🔥🔥
I swear none of these media company commentators can pronounce properly
You should see his pants.
Price?
No way original if it exists already in some guest hall of Big and Powerful 😂😂😂
I need to put some water into the loo…..🤪😘