2021 Subaru Outback review: Like an SUV...but an off-road wagon!

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 26 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 629

  • @lukebrinsmead
    @lukebrinsmead 3 ปีที่แล้ว +78

    I bought an Outback.
    Why? I wanted a car that can drive well on all roads with the ability to be easily parked and visit most camp sites. The car had to be affordable, safe, reliable with adequate space for my family of four. Yes occasionally the boot is a little small for all our camping gear but that’s what roof pods/baskets are for.

    • @JasonISF
      @JasonISF 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Still loving my '04 Outback. Has low range gearing so it's surprisingly capable off road.

    • @oggyoggy1299
      @oggyoggy1299 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Go the RAV 4 instead.

    • @rdmz135
      @rdmz135 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@oggyoggy1299 too small

  • @Doc1855
    @Doc1855 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    The reason why we chose the Outback over another suv was because of the ground clearance, reliability, the AWD system (which is far superior over any other unibody vehicle. The Outback has a LOT more interior space, it’s the safest vehicle on American roads, it’s super comfortable.
    When our Outback wears out we’ll replace it with another Outback.
    When my Rav 4WD Limited wears out we’ll replace it with a Forester Touring (so we can get the Brown interior).
    Our Outback has Ivory interior and we LOVE the color.
    We live in a very mountainous area of the USA in north central WA state and get 5-6 feet of snow every winter.
    We’ve Never had a problem with traction even with over a foot of snow on the unplowed roads. (We’re still using our original factory tires).
    This is our first Subaru but both of my wife’s Brothers and sisters in law live in Montana and get more snow than we do here in Washington state and all they drive is Outback’s.

  • @ashley0423399993
    @ashley0423399993 3 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    I was planning to get the Forester (for car camping) until I saw several “Outback” videos on TH-cam. I really love the roomy interior, large infotainment, leather seats, great head room and large cargo space. Great video, thanks! Decision made.

  • @autonewstv86
    @autonewstv86 3 ปีที่แล้ว +81

    Wagon Utility Vehicle
    WUV, it's what makes a Subaru a Subaru.

    • @mikeykeyes
      @mikeykeyes 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      a subsidiary of GM.

    • @petron1954
      @petron1954 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@mikeykeyes Wrong. Toyota have a large stake in Subaru and appear to be making decisions so that Subaru cars do not compete with or better Toyota cars. That is make them boring like Toyota.

    • @saif890000000
      @saif890000000 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@petron1954 Subaru never boring

    • @petron1954
      @petron1954 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@saif890000000 What I said was "Toyota are making Subaru boring".

    • @petron1954
      @petron1954 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@oldpaddler1158 Yes. It would be nice if it was released here in Australia. Especially with the 2.4Turbo.

  • @MrPhantomPete
    @MrPhantomPete 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    For me, the appeal of a raised wagon over an SUV is 1) raised wagon handles better and 2) the boot space is far more useable in a wagon. I think the new outback is the perfect next vehicle for me, although am holding off buying one until they offer a more powerful engine. Ventilated front seats would be nice too, but not a deal breaker.

  • @adamrenissance3322
    @adamrenissance3322 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I bought the Outback. I compared the Forrester, CR-V, RAV4, CX5, Equinox, and Edge. The Outback seems to me to have equal or more quality, be better thought out specifically the infotainment center. I especially like the automatic dimming wing mirror, the position of the blind spot monitor, the 8-way passenger seat, the position of the automatic sensor in the back hatch, the option of a non-turbo, and the quality of the CVT. I was not specifically looking for all wheel drive, but getting the symmetrical AWD at the same price of other FWD's was huge a bonus. The Outback combines, luxury, utility, and practicality for a reasonable price. Seven months in and 7,000 miles later, I am well pleased with my choice.

  • @eason2946
    @eason2946 3 ปีที่แล้ว +51

    Excellent review Paul! You’re one of my favourite Australian car reviewers at the moment and looking forward for more reviews to come! One thing I would like to see in your reviews though it’s how the car drives/feels in urban/city environment given most of your reviews have been done in rural area only. Anyway keep up the good work mate!

  • @HughRussell06
    @HughRussell06 3 ปีที่แล้ว +37

    Didn’t realise that Apple updated ACP to integrate better with portrait touchscreens which is a good thing

  • @vchanpe1
    @vchanpe1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Drove a RAV4, CR-V but the Outback felt more "planted" to the road. This is because of the lower center of gravity of the 2.5L boxer engine. The high gas mileage, high reliability, smooth ride, low noise and recommendation by consumers report magazine were all I needed. Potential buyers must drive other SUVs to compare and appreciate the Outback.

  • @angelapotter8332
    @angelapotter8332 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    Paul I do have an Outback, 2016 3.6R. It is brilliant and would buy a new one without thinking......if only it had the 2.4T (which some people say is coming next year to Aus). My 2016 is the the only car I have ever owned from new that has not had at least one warranty claim (even the most minor). Not the cheapest car to service but hey if they always run perfectly I’ll take that every time. Highly recommended.

    • @CarExpertAus
      @CarExpertAus  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I loved the 3.6! How are you going with fuel economy over the long term?

    • @angelapotter8332
      @angelapotter8332 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@CarExpertAus Paul city peak hour and peak hour suburban driving sees about 12.2L/100. Suburban flowing traffic around 10.5 L/100. Highway is high 7’s to low 8’s. Currently I am averaging 8.8L/100 for the last 8,000km or so. That would probably be 80% highway. For the driving I do now pretty good, remember too you can use 91 octane.

    • @angelapotter8332
      @angelapotter8332 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@CarExpertAus Paul city peak hour and peak hour suburban driving sees about 12.2L/100. Suburban flowing traffic around 10.5 L/100. Highway is high 7’s to low 8’s. Currently I am averaging 8.8L/100 for the last 8,000km or so. That would probably be 80% highway. For the driving I do now pretty good, remember too you can use 91 octane.

    • @CarExpertAus
      @CarExpertAus  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      That’s pretty impressive!

    • @Tonynz
      @Tonynz 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Subaru dealer in NZ told me it'll be available in 2022. (The 2.4T)

  • @mikeykeyes
    @mikeykeyes 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I found Subarus one of the best cars to drive around and a genuine SUV. My Forester was let down by a certain Geolander tyres downright dangerous in the wet but the car itself was superb. I drove a new Subaru given to me as a loan car and was fascinated by the pick up and go. The control I got was unparalleled.

  • @sylvb1686
    @sylvb1686 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Hello, nice review Paul. I've had my 2021 Outback Sport for a week now and I'm really enjoying it. Only done appx 300ks so far but it drives very nicely. Info screen isn't as distracting as I thought it may have been. I'm still learning how to use the tech that's loaded into the car. Night time vision is awesome and the car is very quiet. It's no rocket leaving the lights but then it's comfortable sitting on 100 on the freeway and just flows with the other traffic. Still early days, but so far really happy.
    Cheers.

    • @petron1954
      @petron1954 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Would like to know how you feel after a few months as I am looking to purchase a 2021 Touring. I would like to see one with the ivory nappa leather beforehand.

  • @metalmick99
    @metalmick99 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I have the previous model, and yesterday had a short drive of this one. I think your observations are really spot-on. Subaru's Outback is the labrador of cars: they do a couple of things very well indeed, and nothing poorly. You can depend on it to meet most, if not all of your needs, whenever that may be. Ownership isn't always smooth, with (in Victoria) some truly second-rate dealerships for servicing. One thing that you touched-on were the minor features: the poor implementation of Android Auto; the need to connect by wire; the lack of decent storage for bits and pieces; no 360 degree camera view, are all seemingly strange omissions. To me a big one is the lack of cooled seats, but provision of a heated steering wheel. The latter is really nice, but I'd swap it for cooled seats every day of the week, particularly in our summers. That said, it's currently at the top of my list for replacing the Outback I have. It's just *there* whenever I need it, and does all I ask of it.

    • @Stevevm21
      @Stevevm21 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Cool seats are in the new 2022 top of the range

    • @metalmick99
      @metalmick99 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Stevevm21 so I hear. I'm really enjoying my OB, but wish I could have waited. (Sigh)

  • @sgzip
    @sgzip 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    We have a 2019 Outback and couldn’t be happier for a family car. Roomy for three adult sized teenagers in the back, relaxed and enjoyable to drive, all the safety and tech I wanted. I’ve been genuinely pleased with the choice after looking at every mid-sized suv I could reasonably find.

  • @Grvmps
    @Grvmps 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I had an original Outback (1996) and it was a brilliant vehicle. The size difference between the original and the current model is massive. This model is practically SUV size and should be labelled as such.

  • @LoftyVisions
    @LoftyVisions 3 ปีที่แล้ว +30

    Gimme a T
    Gimme a U
    Gimme a R
    Gimme a B
    Gimme an O
    What do you get?
    A 2.5 wheeze bag. Cheers Subaru! 🙄💤

    • @pastorofmuppets8834
      @pastorofmuppets8834 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      And a CVT. It's like they hate us.

    • @goose646
      @goose646 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      “A 2.5 wheeze bag” lmao 😂😂

    • @ScottMurrayBestFamilyCars
      @ScottMurrayBestFamilyCars 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Change the channel, mate. The only reason people say this about the 2.5 and Subaru's CVT is because they don't know how to drive. If you need a turbo, you're doing it wrong.

    • @LoftyVisions
      @LoftyVisions 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@ScottMurrayBestFamilyCars lol Righto mate

    • @stevef2608
      @stevef2608 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I've got a 18 forester xt and boy is it fun to drive. Wouldn't trade the turbo out if you paid me. Driving is just that much more engaging (and enjoyable)

  • @GriffDawg94
    @GriffDawg94 3 ปีที่แล้ว +61

    Ive seen 25,368 comments on fb from people asking for a turbo in Aus and the pricks at subaru still wont listen

    • @CarExpertAus
      @CarExpertAus  3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      😅 true!

    • @amode8761
      @amode8761 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I read in another Aussie article that it could come here eventually...

    • @jesserowlingsify
      @jesserowlingsify 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Because the average punter doesn't care, couldn't tell you what a turbo does or how many cylinders are under the bonnet, and will buy it anyway. All the comments on the Subaru posts talk about turbos and 6 cyls because only enthusiasts comment on them. Average punters don't care. And average punters buy, enthusiasts don't.

    • @GriffDawg94
      @GriffDawg94 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@jesserowlingsify so why do other countries have the turbo then? Lol

    • @1991Vn2nV
      @1991Vn2nV 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@GriffDawg94 only the US have the turbo. It was designed and built by Subaru US and they 'own' the engine.
      Also, for reference, in the previous generation, Subaru sold 1 3.6R model for every 44 2.5L models. Where is the business case to pay to have the US engine built and shipped to Japan based on that? Australia sold less than 5,000 outbacks last year, while the US sold around 200,000.
      A turbo version will have to wait until the following model year refresh after the WRX gets the new turbo engine in Japan.

  • @easy4steve
    @easy4steve 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    yes i bought a 2018 outback , and yes its a great car on the highway very good on fuel and power , and very safe too with all very useful safety features . very happy with it Cheers steven

  • @babsschloss
    @babsschloss 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Finally! My car will remind me about those wedding anniversaries ... how have I coped until now?

  • @GryphonHall
    @GryphonHall 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Wagon Pros:
    • ground clearance of an SUV
    • height of a car
    • boot height like a car (slightly higher but not as high as an SUV)
    • roof rack storage height comparable to a car (i.e. I don't need a stepladder to access), so better height clearance even when fully loaded
    • driving experience like a car, rather than an SUV
    • not as top heavy as an SUV
    • practically the same kind of storage space as SUV (because it is longer)
    Wagon Cons:
    • Technically not as much storage space (but only if you fill it "to the brim", but if you want to see out the back window, not really)

  • @lukakamoni5084
    @lukakamoni5084 3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Am really digging into the refreshed model.

  • @AndresK5Blazer
    @AndresK5Blazer 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    My love for Subaru faded as the CVT spread throughout the lineup. I sadly said goodbye to my 2016 Outback, but today I am happy with an 8 speed transmission.

    • @ytlurker220
      @ytlurker220 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Whereas a huge number of people's love for Subaru has been reinspired with this new model. It's truly incredible, no one should need to buy an SUV.

  • @barry7962
    @barry7962 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Handed back my company CX9 and spent my money on an Outback Touring. Quiet, comfortable and economical. Doesn’t have bulk oomph away from lights but doesn’t need much fuel for its size. The tech is amazing and took a few weeks to learn as it is so customisable. The Mazda was tech laden but the Subaru feels very next generation in comparison.

  • @Tonynz
    @Tonynz 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    We were 95% decided on the 2021 Outback, been a Subaru driver for 18 years. However in the end we decided on a CX-9 because it is just that much more luxury inside, more grunt to the engine and the boot is just that much bigger for the two puppies.

    • @tpolerex7282
      @tpolerex7282 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Not contending your other reasons but the CX9 has less boot space than this Outback.

    • @Tonynz
      @Tonynz 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@tpolerex7282 With the third row down or up? Pretty sure that with the third row down, it's bigger... going to check now.

    • @Tonynz
      @Tonynz 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@tpolerex7282 I think the Outback has 512L and the CX-9 has 810L with third row flat

    • @tpolerex7282
      @tpolerex7282 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I see behind the 1st row: CX9 71.2 cubic feet and Outback 75.7 cubic feet.

    • @JasonISF
      @JasonISF 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Mazdas do have nice interiors, but the symmetrical AWD on Subarus is far superior.

  • @sgbb
    @sgbb 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    12:55 the sound of door closing is pretty solid

  • @wigworx
    @wigworx 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    We have the 2019. Just a super practical car. We'll thought out and easy to live with. Wind noise is my only bugbear.

  • @gene978
    @gene978 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Subaru has come LIGHT YEARS from 1978 with our First Subaru DL with 60bhp climbing the hills (second hilliest City in the Country here in the North East) We had 2 long steep hills to get to our house and the little DL never disappointed. Even through the Blizzard of 1978!

  • @shaunwindrim5901
    @shaunwindrim5901 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Own a 3.6 2019 Outback and I am very happy with it. Very practical and meets the need for most purposes, drive is very smooth with good acceleration & highway driving. I do prefer the smaller infotainment screen with some buttons. Horses for courses though, IMO you don't buy an Outback if you want to go big bush traversing.
    Great review Paul, I think you gave it a deserving measured report.

  • @theseb1979
    @theseb1979 3 ปีที่แล้ว +34

    So it’s relatively underpowered and yet the fuel consumption is sitting at around 11l/100 km.

    • @CarExpertAus
      @CarExpertAus  3 ปีที่แล้ว +41

      I’ll caveat that by saying after we filmed this I did an extra 700km in the car and the fuel economy ended up at 7.5L/100km. On the day we filmed it was very hot and we spent most of the time driving at city speeds with a small highway stint thrown in.

    • @theseb1979
      @theseb1979 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      @@CarExpertAus fair enough. That is a lot better.

    • @malandvulamachawe6323
      @malandvulamachawe6323 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      "Underpowered" is one overused cliche in auto reviews.

    • @lowlifeangler
      @lowlifeangler 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@malandvulamachawe6323 I think my 2018 2.5 is pretty fast, a WRX is on the list next to buy

    • @reenachauriya4931
      @reenachauriya4931 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@malandvulamachawe6323 yeah I mean after driving $90k+ cars the normal ones are definitely gonna feel like underpowered to reviewers so I usually ignore that statement whenever it's said.

  • @lindumservices2812
    @lindumservices2812 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Currently have a 2018 Outback 3.6R and I love it. I know its probably only 1 out of 8 outbacks are 3.6 but there is no replacement for me here so will be forced to look to another brand :(

    • @lowlifeangler
      @lowlifeangler 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I have a 2018 2.5 premium. I think it's pretty fast. I should got a 3.6R with a tow package instead. The Outback definitely can go through the snow!!

    • @helicoptermn1463
      @helicoptermn1463 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Do you tow with the 3.6r? Looking at getting one but this new one has more towing capacity even though it’s a smaller engine ?

    • @makingadifference4834
      @makingadifference4834 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      If you live in the US the Mazda CX-50 is on sale in April

  • @Doc1855
    @Doc1855 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Subaru’s are the safest vehicles on American roads today. All other automobile manufacturers are trying to keep up with Subaru and its safety system’s.

  • @andrewd7586
    @andrewd7586 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I am completely onboard with you Paul re SUV’s! I had a 2015 Merc GLC “Somewhat Underwhelming Vehicle” for about 18 months. Traded it in on a Skoda Superb 206kw wagon. Absolutely no regrets! I would seriously consider the Skoda Superb Scout for my next car, but no reason just now to get one. My ONLY issue with the Outback is that still underpowered engine. Why the heck Subaru won’t turbo the thing is beyond me? I considered several Subaru models time & time again & this would’ve been high on my list except for that wheezy engine. 👎🏼

    • @CarExpertAus
      @CarExpertAus  3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Let’s hope they develop the turbo for right-hand drive. I think it’d sell really well here!

    • @andrewd7586
      @andrewd7586 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@CarExpertAus Then it’d be straight on my list👍🏻

    • @andrewkok3467
      @andrewkok3467 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@CarExpertAus Subaru likes to add a turbo to premium variants and so the price goes very high. If they put a turbo onto the base model then the required sales volumes would be achieved.

  • @CaptSavageOZ
    @CaptSavageOZ 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I'm a wagon person, so the outback makes much more sense to me, love the space.

  • @damirjokic1797
    @damirjokic1797 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Very disappointing that turbo version is not available. That's probably the only thing really missing from this package

    • @CarExpertAus
      @CarExpertAus  3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Us too 😭

    • @billnu
      @billnu 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      They are not fast cars without the turbo. Probably not even with the turbo, it was too much money for me so I didn’t test drive. Hello from Minnesota

    • @oddities-whatnot
      @oddities-whatnot 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Nobody needs a turbo if they know how to drive properly. The more power you get in a car, the more that an impatient driver will simply go faster and be even more of a prick on the road. Too much of it nowadays.

    • @terrydanks
      @terrydanks 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@CarExpertAus Turbo not available . . . is this just an Aus. thing?
      Turbo models ARE available in North America . . . they are designated as "XT" in the upscale trim packages.

  • @oddities-whatnot
    @oddities-whatnot 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The current Outback in the UK is a good choice if you don’t want a hybrid, as it has 170bhp compared to 148bhp for the outgoing Forester. Similar prices nearly new.

  • @joshnnik
    @joshnnik 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Great review, this 2021 model hasn’t arrived here in the UK yet but I own a 2019 Outback which I love and rate highly. My other car is a 2016 Audi Q7 with the 272bhp V6 Diesel engine and air suspension. So, to be totally honest if I could only keep one car it would be the Subaru, no question.

    • @mauritsvw
      @mauritsvw 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Now that's loyalty!

  • @sydhowell4813
    @sydhowell4813 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I have a US spec Onyx XT with the 2.4 turbo and it transforms the car. Very sorry you don’t have it there because it is a big improvement in power without too much economy sacrifice. It is interesting to see the different styling cues and different headrest from the US spec cars. I’ve had mine a year and love it. My biggest complaint is having to go into the screen with multiple touches to change seat heater and other settings. Bring back the buttons!!

    • @mauritsvw
      @mauritsvw 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      "Bring back the buttons!!" Second that, but in this screen crazed era it will probably never happen.

  • @yaseene5349
    @yaseene5349 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I agree with you I prefer this over suv, this car is so awesome

  • @thatgaminguy
    @thatgaminguy 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I’d say the appeal of an suv would be the higher ground clearance and high and low range and the CVT is a let down a lot of the time.

    • @CarExpertAus
      @CarExpertAus  3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      The CVT in this is pretty good and most mid-sized SUVs in this segment have less ground clearance.

    • @malandvulamachawe6323
      @malandvulamachawe6323 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Subaru don't build 4x4s.

    • @thatgaminguy
      @thatgaminguy 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @T A not at all Subaru’s say that their vehicles in this segment are adventure vehicles they used to have Low range in them but they removed it (in the manual)

    • @lowlifeangler
      @lowlifeangler 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@CarExpertAus the CVT is alot better than GM's CVT .....alot

    • @petron1954
      @petron1954 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Outback has better ground clearance than most SUV's

  • @hrk2hrk
    @hrk2hrk 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is my second subaru outback and I still love it.

  • @johnturnbull2146
    @johnturnbull2146 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    As an older Australian I found that the slight stoop to get into the Outback is the difference for me with the Forester, wish it wasn't so but ease of access is a biggie and Subaru Oz, get the turbo engine here asap.

  • @richieduck67
    @richieduck67 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Does a grey cardigan come with it or optional? No turbo not interested asthmatic 2.5 and wheezy CVT.

  • @jm-river4573
    @jm-river4573 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Great review Paul! How would you say the ride compares to the current 2.5 Forester?

    • @CarExpertAus
      @CarExpertAus  3 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      The ride in the Forester is pretty good - this feels a little more comfortable. But the road noise is a little greater here than it is in Forester.

  • @Doc1855
    @Doc1855 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    WOW, I LOVE the tan metallic exterior paint. That looks fabulous !
    Here in the USA Subaru doesn’t offer that color.
    Here we have Depressing silver, grey, charcoal grey, Death black, dark mahogany red, (almost black), Crimson Red, Autumn Green , Dark Blue and White.
    The only standard interior colors are depressing grey, death black.
    On some more expensive trim level’s you can get a gorgeous ivory, (like on our Outback) or classy Napa brown.
    But all trim levels come with death black interior plastics and carpeting.
    We also own a 11 Toyota Rav Limited 4WD with a pretty Gold exterior and tan leather seats, tan carpeting , tan door inserts and seat belts . The rest of the interior plastics are death black.
    I think all automobile manufacturers think everyone on the planet is Super Depressed or Suicidal bc they are choosing paint colors and horrible drab interior colors.
    These drab colors became popular in 1990. That was almost 33 years ago.
    I don’t know about y’all down under, but Americans are sick and tired of Gloomy colors.

  • @chmiroau
    @chmiroau 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Well, you want to know why we chose this Outback instead of the Rav4 (Should be called the Rav bore though) Hybrid, the Mitsu Pajero Sport and the Forrester. Well, practicality, some prestige and the fact that it rides like a car which is great because our kids get car sick easily.

  • @paulmaconochie8909
    @paulmaconochie8909 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I took delivery of an MY21 Outback Touring a couple of weeks ago. I had traded a MY10 Forester and the car before that was also a Forester. I agree with all the comments made in this review. Every car will have bits you like and bits you are a bit disappointed in. For me the disappointment is in the infotainment system. Overall it is very good except the touch screen is laggy; it can seem like an age while typing in letters, for example. The implementation of Android Auto is not particularly good. I have seen better on other cars. But, let's not be too niggly. The Outback is a lovely car, I enjoy its comfort and I particularly like how quiet it is and thus how much I can enjoy the superior sound system. Finally I reckon it It represents very good value for money; you do get a lot of bang for your buck.

  • @benbaxter132
    @benbaxter132 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I’m reasonably sure the lack of portrait mode is an Android Auto limitation rather than something Subaru has done poorly. Apple specifically updated their software to work with portrait screens.

  • @martingifford5415
    @martingifford5415 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I love the new dash, the safety, and the flat back when the seats are folded down. The big down side is the bad fuel economy. Going over 10 L/100km is bad. But it does use 91 fuel, which is cheaper. Regarding SUV's, the obvious benefit is RIDE HEIGHT. I find it weird that reviewers are oblivious about this issue. I want to be AS HIGH AS POSSIBLE to take in the view and see ahead. I don't want to look up the exhaust pipes of the car in front. When I drove a delivery van, I loved the HEIGHT.

  • @seanpatrickperfecto7426
    @seanpatrickperfecto7426 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I really like their take on the plastic cladding above the tires. Adds to the overall design.

  • @christoskontogiannis9031
    @christoskontogiannis9031 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Great review! You guys are always a step ahead and you cover all of my potential questions on a new car! About this specific all rounder as you described it, my most important negative comment would be that there is only a petrol edition without any hybrid section to combine it for lower consumption. Rather than that is an absolute all around vehicle with hi end tech safety and it really upgrades your style. Very elegant car but unfortunately much more expensive to purchase here in Greece than any other country.
    Keep on your great work guys and thank you for your reviews 🙏🏼

    • @ekimandersom4478
      @ekimandersom4478 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hybrid rarely gives lower consumption

  • @angusnz7910
    @angusnz7910 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Had outback’s since 1999, replaced in 2004, then 2009....went to change again in 2012 and just couldn’t do it. Still have the 09 3.0l outback as a run around and went VW as main car. Huge affection for my old outback...newer one too big, too ugly, too slow, too plasticy....just couldn’t do it. This one looks better...but are they going to give it a proper engine ?

  • @Oddish08
    @Oddish08 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Great review! The only thing killing me is the fuel economy! rav4 still top of my list

  • @michaelthompson6972
    @michaelthompson6972 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Great review. I’m planning to update my current 2018 model so this review really helped me to understand what’s new/different in the 2021 model. Cheers!

  • @derekharvey5257
    @derekharvey5257 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Was so looking forward to this car with the turbo 2.4 when I order my next car in April. I’ve had 2 Outbacks, a diesel Gen4 and 2.5i Gen5, and will not buy another 2.5, which I though was underpowered to the point of being a liability on the highway when loaded with 4 people plus luggage. I could not contemplate towing anything with it. So it is such a shame because otherwise I love it. Will Subaru Australia listen or just go with the option that ~80%of their customers seem to be happy with (not sure of actual split of 2.5 vs 3.6 vs diesel in the Gen5)?

    • @1991Vn2nV
      @1991Vn2nV 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      1 3.6R for every 44 2.5L sold
      The 2.4 turbo was designed and engineered by Subaru US and is built in the US. RHD outbacks are manufactured in Japan.
      No business case to ship a turbo engine from the US to Japan just for a few Australian sales (consider the split above, and that we sold less than 5,000 outbacks last year vs around 200,000 in the US).
      We won't see a turbo variant unti the model year afterl the new WRX turbo is produced in Japan.

    • @derekharvey5257
      @derekharvey5257 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks for the info, that’s an even smaller volume of 3.6 sales than I had guessed. Absolutely it would be/is a marginal business case. I can’t help feeling though that in following the numbers and serving the mainstream Subaru are losing a bit of their magic sauce and appeal for the enthusiasts and more discerning buyer

  • @cdm4593
    @cdm4593 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Besides the steering wheel being on the wrong side and you driving on the wrong side of the road I would say that was a great report on a nice car.

  • @philmurray3651
    @philmurray3651 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Hey Paul, thanks for the review of the 2021 Subaru Outback. I currently drive a 2012 Nissan Murano which I bought as my very first brand new vehicle. Have loved the 6 cylinder, comfortable, full leather Murano but now ready to update the technology and tossing up between an Outback or a Forester. My wife drives a 2016 Forester and we use that vehicle as our road trip car. Fantastic, great vision, AWD safe vehicle.
    You ask, why a standard SUV over an Outback? Well, the Forester is 6cm higher which makes it easier for us older folk (post 65) to slide in and out without banging your head. The Forester's turning circle means it spins on a dime, but ... in 2022 I'll likely go the Outback for that big screen entertainment/information unit. Would still like to drive a 6 cylinder vehicle for the grunt, but, hey, the world is moving elsewhere. LOL

  • @Naessey
    @Naessey 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Great review as always. I’ve always loved Subaru. Though, stick a small caravan on back and loaded car with gear and kids, the underpowered engine and increase in economy is going to be noticeable.

  • @HughRussell06
    @HughRussell06 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Appeal of an SUV over this is probably the fact your driving position is higher up which means you have better visibility

    • @CarExpertAus
      @CarExpertAus  3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Yeah I can see how that would potentially appeal.

    • @ScottMurrayBestFamilyCars
      @ScottMurrayBestFamilyCars 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Nah, that's just a myth. It's exactly the same. Just raise the seat height, or learn to look further down the road, not at what's happening on the proceeding car's tailgate. I say this from three years' first-hand experience.

    • @petron1954
      @petron1954 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ScottMurrayBestFamilyCars I agree, and that is from over 50 years driving experience in a variety of on and off road vehicles - cars, buses and trucks.

    • @ld9387
      @ld9387 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It's actually just for status. SUVs are a trend

    • @crazysithslave
      @crazysithslave 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I think it seems, when I'm on the road anyway, the SUV is a status symbols for mum's, I think they believe that the SUV is safer??... or make them feel more "in control" on the road... I hate being behind them in my lower sedan as you can never see through in front of them to predict what's going to happen on the road, and they tend to be worse/slower more unaware drivers.... and no I'm not having a go at female drivers, just at the times I'm driving after work is school traffic and it's predominantly mums driving kids in their SUVs. Personally I think SUVs are beyond ridiculous.... but then I drive a V8 sedan, not an SUV

  • @judih.8754
    @judih.8754 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Interestingly the 2021 US model didn't have the wide fender cladding. We only saw it in 2023. Also your coffee cups in Australia are quite small by normal standards here! Unfortunately its difficult to find a decent size like that. Great review!

  • @whya2ndaccount
    @whya2ndaccount 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Last one, I believe the indicator stalk is a bit annoying, not the crisp on/off of earlier models. I gather you need to specifically turn it off, not just flick it with your hand?

  • @Ant3739
    @Ant3739 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    1. Yes, I like you mentioning the available colours. 2. The Durometer. Get rid of it. The numbers don't mean that much. Just say - subjectively since we trust your reviews - whether the soft bits are comfortable and whether there are hard or soft bits where it matters. You spend way too much time explaining what a Durometer is and, again, those numbers...3. Why I would choose an SUV over the Outback: 2 reasons: First, the look. I like the look of an SUV over a hatchback. The second reason is height. An SUV sits higher, which is nicer to me. Love your reviews btw.

  • @mrkring1526
    @mrkring1526 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Can someone tell me why Subaru still insist on still having 12kw/22nm cars? Every year we whine about it being gutless yet every year we get a kW or 2.. cmon Subaru

    • @ytlurker220
      @ytlurker220 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Scream at Subaru Australia to demand Japan to give us the 2.4L Turbo the US market has for the Outback. Far more peppy and efficient. It's beyond me why they stick with the 2.5.

    • @petron1954
      @petron1954 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Maybe it is because Toyota have a major stake in Subaru and they want to make Subaru cars as boring as Toyota cars.

    • @millicentonyinzo7240
      @millicentonyinzo7240 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ytlurker220
      Sn
      S7barm

  • @needleontherecord
    @needleontherecord 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    What happens when the screen stops working? No climate control, no car controls and no radio

    • @CarExpertAus
      @CarExpertAus  3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Same as most modern cars today with digital screens. But I’d be keen to see how they deal with it.

    • @aytugdemir1323
      @aytugdemir1323 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I doubt the screen will ever stop working, at least anytime early during its lifespan. There's cars that are 15, 20 years old with crappy infotainment systems that work. My 2011 Sienna has an infotainment system that still works like new. If you're buying a dinosaur of a vehicle, you're acknowledging that it will have problems, and that it's all on you if they break

  • @Set_your_handle77
    @Set_your_handle77 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    12:56 The rear head rests are different that those here in the US. These look classier but somewhat odd that they go down below shoulder level when lowered. Any reason for that?

  • @MrHariniz
    @MrHariniz 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I own the previous model. Pros : The outback is super comfy bcoz of its long wheel base + very good safety features like subaru eyesight.. value for money . Cons : under power.. doesnt help overtaking or sudden launch , Subaru service is very high - as the dealer will come up with reasons to charge you for some extra part sale when you gove it for service. Also when you give it for service make sure you do the walk around check WITH the dealer and then hand over the keys for service. Subaru Bundoora Service gave me back my car after Service with a deep dent and told me it was there before. my bad i did the walk around check by my self before I gave then the key.. I was 100% sure that the dent wasnt there as I did the check before i gave the key for service :( never going back to Subaru or subaru Bundoora again. they lost my respect. My friends wont be going there as well as they are charged with so many parts during service.

  • @Evilwing12
    @Evilwing12 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I wish the US version of the outback had this styling mainly the grill and the fog light Front facia. Also on the forester.

  • @hedydd2
    @hedydd2 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    The appeal of a real SUV is in the seating position. Also in the generally superior towing capacity. Also if you go to Land Rover or Land Cruiser, the all round capability knocks this thing into touch in every way you can dream of apart from the running cost. If that capability is not needed, then a wagon will suit many users just fine. No doubt many will not even need 4wd and that's fine for them, there's plenty of choice.

  • @DellyDoo
    @DellyDoo 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I went from years of SUVs to an Outback and I cannot wait to sell my Outback and go back to an SUV. Made a mistake with this car. It has some nice features (e.g. the turbo), but I miss being higher up and some of the more luxury features of my last cars. The factory tires are crap (U.S.) and the infotainment is too buggy. The car doesn't recognize me half the time and I've never seen better than 15mpg (US). If you like wagons you'll like this car. If you don't, you won't. I learned I don't like wagons. Such a throwback to the 70s

  • @markpukete
    @markpukete 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Paul’s review never disappoint me.

  • @chappo4845
    @chappo4845 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Don't currently drive an SUV but expect people buy them for a number of genuine reasons;
    - Easy to get in and out of
    - Visibility in traffic
    - Ground clearance over sedans and standard wagons
    - Perceived luggage capacity - I say perceived as the usable space in a SUV is often inferior to a decent boot.
    And of course, status in many cases.
    I get the appeal of Subaru cars, especially in days gone by. These days they seem underpowered and I'm not a fan of the CVT. In my view Subaru gives the air of perceived quality without the cost of more expensive brands. Almost a Volvo for half the price.
    Am I right in assuming they're long lasting too?

  • @taohan2281
    @taohan2281 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    First time that I drove a car before paul tests it. Have to say, outback is too hard to resist and cant wait for my Outback sports in autumn green!

  • @josephmuia6178
    @josephmuia6178 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    you give the chapters but end up watching the full review! genuine review but you need to focus more on the negatives. This will give potential buyers what they will live with if they end up buying the car

  • @The9meister
    @The9meister 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Good review, you explained the tech better than any of the other reviews I have watched, I want a sport model in wilderness green please.

  • @MultiDesignGuy
    @MultiDesignGuy 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Paul many would say SUV because the Subaru has no 4Wd, transfer case, (CVT is shite) its underpowered (no turbo in oz) not enough ground clearance, departure angle etc.
    Now with that all said I’m attracted i think however if we do get the Turbo Wilderness model next year then i am 100% getting one!!

  • @TheKataan
    @TheKataan 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Was considering the Outback but went with SUV in the end.
    IMHO Outback isn't worse than an SUV but it really isn't better either (form factor). So other criteria decide. Tech, design, transmission, engine, image, etc...
    Living in a city, Length / Width vs practicality are the deciding factors for me. Height isn't really factoring in. And It's not like the Outback drives much better than a good SUV (or is it Paul?).

  • @johndarwin7937
    @johndarwin7937 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Happy to buy this but would prefer a turbo petrol

  • @paulholder9361
    @paulholder9361 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Yes, but how well does it tow ? That's likely why many want a full size turbo.

  • @M8YM8
    @M8YM8 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I got the Forester because you didn’t need to bend down as low to get babies in the car seats. Also I would have thought the Forester had better approach/departure angles.

  • @chris2favip
    @chris2favip 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    In regards to wagon over SUVs, the joke is this wagon came 3 months later after the purchase of SUV.... but the true is, I know some one would like to sit higher which I believe most of Subaru focus too much on lower the CG, so their roof seem somewhat lower... but the biggest minus for this outback to other SUV’s for me is the engine and gearbox combo....

  • @jean-loubertrand6896
    @jean-loubertrand6896 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Got my new 2021 Outback Sport in November last year. I have to say the tech, safety and interior is excellent with tonnes of space inside. It also looks good outside. A head turner. sadly that's it. The ride is too smooth and spongy and the engine is underpowered for the size. I wouldn't dare towing although you can do 2000Kg. The cvt gets a bit loud when in S drive. Overall it's a good car to own.

  • @cuipougy
    @cuipougy 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hi, I wonder if a car's performance, e.g. 0-100 could be more accurately tested, perhaps with the use of equipment other than relying on each car's speedo. Also, it would be great to compile a spreadsheet with all cars' performance numbers, even if only 0-100 so a comparison could be made.
    Keep up the excellent work!

  • @brianhoward9217
    @brianhoward9217 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Great review Paul, as usual so thanks. They need the 3.6R back WITH a turbo. What's wrong with Subaru now? An asthmatic N/A 2.5 four?! C'mon, where's that STi spirit? :-) We have a 2015 3.6R and it is, for us, perfect. Top quality, no issues ever.I wouldn't want anything with LESS urge than our 3.6R that's for sure. A turbo on that unit would be heaven.

    • @darrellborland119
      @darrellborland119 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Brian Howard...I am not sure why one needs more power....the turbo 2.4 is more powerful than the 3.6...maybe to chase high end euro-suv's?....maybe as we say in the motorcycle world...never enough oomph! 😀 The 2.4 turbo gets better mpg than the 3.6. But, of course, with high fuel prices, economical driving seems more prudent. Thanks.

    • @brianhoward9217
      @brianhoward9217 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@darrellborland119 Hi Darrell, I'm in Australia so was talking from an Aussie viewpoint. We only have the naturally aspirated 4 cylinder here currently, although Subaru is making grumbling noises about bringing the turbo in. Why they'd even waste time with this normal motor and not just going straight to turbo is beyond me. Incidentally, it isn't the 'power' I love most about the 3.6R - I should have been more specific - it is the low end torque. The launch feel is magnificent, and when and not something a smaller 4-cyl can 'easily' replicate, even a turbo methinks but I haven't driven a Suby turbo.

  • @philipwest4553
    @philipwest4553 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I decided to buy a Forester rather than an Outback because the Forester suited my needs a little better gets a bit better fuel economy and has better visibility for the driver.
    I think that there's no front sensors for parking and the like because the 'eyesight' cameras give a very good view of what is in front of the vehicle if you use the 'mode' button and look at the top screen. I think the camera view is better than the chorus of beeps from sensors.

  • @Braselton21
    @Braselton21 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Don't you get the Volvo V60 Cross Country in Australia?

    • @StephenFogarty2023
      @StephenFogarty2023 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      No
      Unfortunately !!
      It was meant to get here in April 2020
      But did not !!
      Kept getting delayed
      It’s is finally getting to Australia in July / August this year...

  • @bushanliger
    @bushanliger 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Would love an Outback but not a fan of the CVT

  • @Cooliemasteroz
    @Cooliemasteroz 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I love the concept though I’m not to sure about the durability of Subaru engines but I still thought I’d like to get one one day until the only gearbox option is now a CVT.

    • @ekimandersom4478
      @ekimandersom4478 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Most reliable cars on the planet, that would be the last thing to worry about.

  • @Doc1855
    @Doc1855 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Here in the USA we can get a turbo 2.4L 260hp engine in the Outback with the XT trim level.
    It’s quick but not as quick as my 11 Rav 4WD Limited with a 269hp 3.5L V6 naturally aspirated engine and my Rav gets better fuel economy.

  • @Doc1855
    @Doc1855 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Again, I LOVE all the chrome and the look of the nose on the Outback you have in Australia. It’s bold and classy looking at the same time. It’s Fabulous !

  • @Set_your_handle77
    @Set_your_handle77 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    1:18 Where is the front tow hook mounting point on Australian model? Is it under the car?

  • @M8YM8
    @M8YM8 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hey Paul, would love to see you include some of the off-road components in the AWD SUVs, specifically sand. This car especially is marketed as the best of both worlds but I can’t find many videos on how they go beach driving.

  • @jaroslavtyrner1977
    @jaroslavtyrner1977 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Hi Paul, i like very much you channel. I am from Czech Republic and i want to buy new Subaru Outback. What do you think about reliability of Cvt transmission? Thanks a lot for your answer. Jaroslav

  • @Speckled10
    @Speckled10 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Great video thanks SO MUCH for showing us the Apple Car Play with full portrait mode support !!! Have not been able to get an answer on this up till now .. hopefully Android Auto will support it soon too ..

  • @DonutGuy-2000
    @DonutGuy-2000 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Paul which you take - the Outback or the Skoda Superb Scout?

    • @StephenFogarty2023
      @StephenFogarty2023 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      IMO
      Both are very good cars
      Superb is bigger, and more expensive
      Check them both out and test drive etc..
      Pick the one you like the most ?

  • @paulredfern2252
    @paulredfern2252 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    you can skip the ISOFIX as its been an ADR standard since 2014 (introduced since 2012)

  • @Kruse1
    @Kruse1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    A gutless naturally aspirated 2.5 rather than a turbo 2.0? come on.

    • @tonys8243
      @tonys8243 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Why they think Australians prefer cars that are flat out getting out of their own way amazes me...

    • @Wrang15
      @Wrang15 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Hope for the 2.4 T like we have in the states.

    • @ytlurker220
      @ytlurker220 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@tonys8243 look, look! It's a 2.5, not a 2.4 turbo, it must be more powerful!

  • @VenkateshPattamatta
    @VenkateshPattamatta 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    How does the Outback Touring fare with Mitsubishi Outlander? I cant find any comparisons between these two

  • @philross1680
    @philross1680 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great report on the Outback Paul I think it’s the best I have viewed. I have owned a number of Subaru’s over the years including the Outback and for the most part I have been very happy with them.
    I probably would have been interested in buying the new ‘21 edition but Subaru took so long in getting it released here (a year later than the US) that late last year I decided to go for a RAV4 Cruiser Hybrid (mainly because as luck would have it I could get one!) and I would have to say it’s the best Toyota I’ve driven.
    However back to the new Outback it looks to be the best version of this model that Subaru have brought out so far. I still think the design could have been further updated as it still has some of the exterior look of the 2010 model, Subaru have given a facelift similar to what they did with the latest Forester and I must admit they have become very similar in appearance especially in the tail. I only wish they would have given us a bit more power in the engine bay and I’d have to say the RAV4 has it over Subaru in this respect.
    I agree with you on the Piano Black finishes they are too easy to become marked or scratched even new from the factory (just have a look at one of the new Mazda’s) I just don’t know why vehicle manufacturers continue with this unfortunate design feature.
    To answer your question on SUV’s Vs Wagons I think it’s become a state of mind the motoring public, SUV’s have become such a craze and fascination most people still view wagons as an extension of a normal sedan. This however will hopefully be changed a little with the new generation constant All Wheel Drive Outback which is certainly worth considering as it has the same or more going for it than the average mid size SUV.
    Just have a look at the new Outback sport which would be pick of the bunch.😊

    • @petron1954
      @petron1954 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I think the Sport would be the pick of the bunch as well, but without all the black accenting.

  • @johnnumbat9782
    @johnnumbat9782 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks Paul - as mentioned previously I’ve owned 10 Subarus models such as Leone, Liberty, Forester, Outback and WRX GC8 doing an equal run of kms in urban and offroad/high country in the ACT - the Liberty did not have enough ground clearance - the Outback was really in name only as I found the long nose (poor approach angle) would quickly dig in to the ground when climbing steep gravel fire trails and the same with the rear and not enough rear storage space - from then only owned Foresters with better approach angles, high cabin roof and more room internally - John in SA

  • @runejensen6145
    @runejensen6145 ปีที่แล้ว

    Paul mentions this has noticable wind noise - but doesn't the Aussie Touring model have acoustic glass and both front and sides?

  • @Dnuggrepresenting
    @Dnuggrepresenting 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    With wired Apple Carplay/Android Auto I think a wireless charger seems a bit redundant. The phone is plugged in everytime you drive anyway. At that point it's an addition for the passenger.