Husqvarna 372xp VS Stihl 044 ms440 chainsaw parts talk cylinder porting & crankshaft design

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 26 ส.ค. 2024
  • just some fun information about the cylinder, crank, piston differences on the 50mm bore and 36mm stroke 2 cycle chainsaw engines.

ความคิดเห็น • 20

  • @Csmith07
    @Csmith07 ปีที่แล้ว

    Top end power and bottom end power could be a direct relationship to the weight of piston and crank on each saw? No expert but that would tend to make sense to me.

  • @gundysgarage6664
    @gundysgarage6664 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Awesome 👍 less rotating mass with a Stihl crank assembly… good to know! Love your stuff Mr. 🤘

  • @alfredosanchez383
    @alfredosanchez383 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hey I need a PTO END CRANKSHAFT FOR A SPORTSMAN POLARIS 600 twin 2003 where can I find one ?

  • @coolestguyontheplanet723
    @coolestguyontheplanet723 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    did you measure pistons from the wrist pin ?
    or from the skirt ?

  • @bulletproofsaws
    @bulletproofsaws 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Really good video.. first of yours I've seen but subscribed.. well done..

  • @sagebrushhillbilly4655
    @sagebrushhillbilly4655 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Great video! Thanks for sharing!

  • @230e4
    @230e4 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Clutch and drum on the Husky is heavier and stronger too. It would be nice if they would combine the best attributes of each brand into one great saw. Which aftermarket brand crankshaft would you consider the best, hardness, and quality?

  • @MrHangerone
    @MrHangerone 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    G'day mate if you ever get a chance have a look at solo 670 chainsaw 70cc 48mm piston or solo 680 saw 80cc 52mm piston both saws have 38mm stroke massive transfers loved the video

    • @rockymountainchainsaw
      @rockymountainchainsaw  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Sorry I have not had the opportunity yet to look at one of those close up.

    • @MrHangerone
      @MrHangerone 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@rockymountainchainsaw think Husqvarna 372 xp on steroids , mass once you get it moving it's hard to stop it cheers down Under 😎 Kevin

  • @julioshaheen8386
    @julioshaheen8386 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Interesting the 038 mag is a 52mm bore, I would have thought the 044 would be larger bore, I was under the impression the 44 replaced the 038

    • @230e4
      @230e4 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      In 1990 I went to my local Stihl dealer to shop for my first logging saw, I was looking to get an 038. I looked at the 038 MagII, the 044, and the 064. The 038 was 72.2cc @15 pounds, the 044 was 70.7cc @ 12.8 pounds, and the 064 was 84.9cc @ 15.2 pounds. The 064 balanced perfectly with a 24" bar and chain. My dad had been running 064s since 86 and thought them to be the better saw. I walked out with a 064 and alot of other folks did too. I did eventually buy a 038 Mag II many years later, and my first 064 is still going strong. If my memory serves me right, Stihl ended the 038 MagII in 1993. All three are great saws.

    • @julioshaheen8386
      @julioshaheen8386 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@230e4 Correct i purchased mine in 1993 they are heavy.

    • @230e4
      @230e4 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@julioshaheen8386 Does yours have a full or 1/2 wrap handle?

    • @julioshaheen8386
      @julioshaheen8386 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@230e4 Half wrap, Jeremy has it now making a pipe for it.

    • @230e4
      @230e4 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@julioshaheen8386 That's cool, maybe we will get to see it run. Thanks for sharing.

  • @nateolmsted899
    @nateolmsted899 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    440 all the way