Pre Arrival Working Structure Fire Point Pleasant Beach, NJ 4/18/21

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 17 เม.ย. 2021
  • Around 1:40 PM Point Pleasant Beach dispatched a smoke invest at the Point Beach Apartments next to the Ark Bar & Grill on Route 35. Reports of smoke coming out two windows of the second-story unit. The second report came in of the screens melting, Cheif then told dispatch to upgrade to a possible working fire. They tried to gain access to the unit but the door was locked and nobody seemed to be home. Shortly after the smoke started to push faster they then made entry to find heavy fire in the attic and second floor. 4305 was first due and hooked to the hydrant on the corner and stretched in an attack line through the front and into the unit. At this time heavy fire was pouring out the windows shortly after there was water on the fire. Crews started to vent the roof and look for an extension. Sad to report one dog was lost due to the fire & smoke conditions, no one was home all searches were negative.
    Stations 42,42 and squad 34 from Point Beach. Station 75 for the FAST TEAM. Along with squad 35.
    The cause of the fire is unknown at the time and is under investigation.
    INSTA - Jersey Shore Fire Response

ความคิดเห็น • 1K

  • @scrapcash2421
    @scrapcash2421 2 ปีที่แล้ว +187

    At my department, we try to have water flowing within 1 minute of the tires stopping. Very effective!! This department needs to try it!!

    • @markaaronclemons6089
      @markaaronclemons6089 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I will tell my fire unit saraland fire station 3 about it

    • @chaosXP3RT
      @chaosXP3RT 2 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      I have a question:
      Why are American firefighters so slow, lazy and unprofessional? Why do you watch fires and not put them out?

    • @claymusic640
      @claymusic640 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@chaosXP3RT frfrfrfr....I am a firefighter in Switzerland and there will be water flowing after LESS than 3 minutes after tires stopping...

    • @virgilhilts3924
      @virgilhilts3924 ปีที่แล้ว

      You aren't a firefighter and you are FOS

    • @scrapcash2421
      @scrapcash2421 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@virgilhilts3924 I am a volunteer firefighter, and have been for 27 years. Guess that shows you don't know S**T!!

  • @hiddencharges
    @hiddencharges 3 ปีที่แล้ว +81

    Screw the chainsaw.......put some damn water on the fire!

    • @jaysmith1408
      @jaysmith1408 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      But they like to use the chainsaw

    • @zechariahmcclain3083
      @zechariahmcclain3083 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      IF IM CORRECT THEY NEEDED THE CHAINSAW TO START VENTING ON THE ROOF, SO THE SMOKE CAN CLEAR OUT OF THE BUILDING.

    • @andrewallason4530
      @andrewallason4530 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@zechariahmcclain3083 smoke (and flame) was well and truely venting out of the building well before the saw came out. Through the two objects previously known as windows, now flues.

    • @jerseyshorefireresponse
      @jerseyshorefireresponse  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@andrewallason4530 hahahahaha

    • @scrapcash2421
      @scrapcash2421 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@zechariahmcclain3083 You're NOT CORRECT!!

  • @andyr8812
    @andyr8812 3 ปีที่แล้ว +419

    Here in Europe, the firefighters start pouring water into the fire as soon as they arrive. It usually works very well.

    • @arthurdowling970
      @arthurdowling970 3 ปีที่แล้ว +47

      Funny how when you put water on a fire it tends to put it out of

    • @davidwhite2544
      @davidwhite2544 3 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      We had a motto years ago, Hit it Hard from the Yard, before you make entry. It never caught on.

    • @FromGamingwithLove0456
      @FromGamingwithLove0456 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@davidwhite2544 That's just a cliche now... many departments use it- when it's necessary. Why are you going to "hit it HARD from the YARD" when you can barely see smoke on arrival?
      A lot of departments serving areas with traditional architecture still don't really understand the need. Even departments that do understand the need wouldn't "need" to use it in this instance.
      Those of us working in newer communities understand that just because you hit it from outside doesn't mean you don't need to go in... since the volatility of the environment of modern furnishings offgassing in a traditional build is a very precarious dragon to slay if you want to advance toe to toe with it.
      Take a guy from a station working predominantly traditional and move him into a newer community where homes are stuffed together and practically built with propane and they start to understand the concept and why it's important- but without the context we're all just pussies.

    • @brandoneiger
      @brandoneiger 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Depending on the S.O.P.s of the individual department the same takes place here in the United States. Look at how Boston operates. That procedure works for them, Then drive down 95-South into the Big Apple. Every department operates in the way that best fits their circumstances.
      But one thing is dead certain: Only amateurs put water on smoke. The rest of us locate the fire and put the wet stuff on the red stuff.

    • @OwneyMadden430
      @OwneyMadden430 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@arthurdowling970 wtf are u saying

  • @jstring
    @jstring ปีที่แล้ว +18

    Legend has it there is still heavy fire showing from the second floor.

    • @trvman1
      @trvman1 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Thank you for posting that. I was wondering what kind of fire it was and what floor it was coming from :)

  • @jefflloyd5987
    @jefflloyd5987 2 ปีที่แล้ว +263

    25 years on the job, don't ever remember seeing it take so long for what should have been a "quick attack".

    • @sueann9196
      @sueann9196 2 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      Hell water can could have put it out. But no we can't do that

    • @gottgaame
      @gottgaame 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      They do it on purpose now a days. They wait for it to catch fire

    • @rosejohnson9957
      @rosejohnson9957 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      I just watched it and I was like come on hurry up get some water put it in the window I don't understand.

    • @thoigianvotan3295
      @thoigianvotan3295 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thấy anh BRZ Nga Lao vào Cứu VN mình muốn học hỏi.

    • @davidburrows4801
      @davidburrows4801 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Could have been put out with couple of bowls of water at the beginning ridiculous.

  • @MegaUnclesalty
    @MegaUnclesalty 3 ปีที่แล้ว +101

    Anyone here who thinks this department did a good job is out of ur minds. This type of fire should have been bread and butter. On arrival that fire could have been put out with less than 200 gallons of water. I'm going to assume the first due piece carries that much. Even if it was a ladder. Use tank water and put a stop on that. They have enough pieces coming behind them that 2nd due can grab ur water supply. If your crew isn't capable of going interior stand in that doorway and send the water in. The steam conversion alone will extinguish a fire in that apartment. We aren't talking about a 2000 Sq foot plus home here. Sending someone to the roof with a k12 is crazy. The fire is already vented out the windows. They aren't clearing any smoke or heat at that point. Keep ur guy on that bucket if you really want to let command know of changing conditions from the roof. Finally get rid of at least 12 of those white helmets on scene. The fire might put itself out at that point

    • @ffjsb
      @ffjsb 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Anyone who uses ur, instead of YOUR is an idiot. You have NO idea of what they had to do to get to where the fire was.

    • @bobrosso9147
      @bobrosso9147 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@ffjsb please. First in could have hit that shit from the ground with an attack line.

    • @tomcander3669
      @tomcander3669 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      He was using a chainsaw

    • @MegaUnclesalty
      @MegaUnclesalty 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@tomcander3669 he went to the roof with the k12

    • @MegaUnclesalty
      @MegaUnclesalty 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@ffjsb the fire is showing itself. YOU'RE the reason fire department standards are lowering. Go save YOUR foundations and pat YOURSELVES on the back

  • @mm-hw9ku
    @mm-hw9ku 3 ปีที่แล้ว +130

    Don’t put put water on the fire. You have to let it cook and spread into the attic.

    • @michaelmiller8460
      @michaelmiller8460 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      K to ok po òòòkjkkjkj ki kol po obo kookpoo

    • @DasArab
      @DasArab 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Ah but you see that then allows them to cut loads of holes in the roof......

    • @SkysharkMediaAerialImagery
      @SkysharkMediaAerialImagery 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I’m pretty sure in murica they like to let it get out of hand so they have better stories to swap.

    • @markaaronclemons6089
      @markaaronclemons6089 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Mm. You no dot. You put water 💧💦 on the fire, as soon as you grab the attack line from the fire truck 🚛🚒

    • @GraemeMurphy
      @GraemeMurphy 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@DasArab Firefighters moonlighting as roofers !

  • @lenschneider8604
    @lenschneider8604 3 ปีที่แล้ว +77

    In my 45 years I have never seen that kind of clown act. 6 minutes to get water on the fire that probably wasn't anymore then room and contents

    • @ffjsb
      @ffjsb 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Too bad that in 45 years you never learned to read smoke so that you could tell that they DID start to get water on the fire around 3:15, and had to back out for some reason....

    • @TheTemporary
      @TheTemporary 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      They just want a big fire so they can be called heros.

    • @paulbentley2338
      @paulbentley2338 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      there are so many videos on TH-cam just like this. I have yet to see a US firefighter run.

  • @beckytwister01
    @beckytwister01 3 ปีที่แล้ว +41

    Way to go on showing what not to do.

    • @jackh577
      @jackh577 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Please enlighten us.

    • @beckytwister01
      @beckytwister01 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@jackh577
      Figure it out for yourself.

    • @RLTtizME
      @RLTtizME 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@beckytwister01 You really are taking much too much testosterone sweetie.

  • @roguejeff1
    @roguejeff1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +59

    My deepest condolences to the family who lost their home, it's contents and especially their beloved 🐕. 😥

  • @chaddavis523
    @chaddavis523 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    "Light smoke showing. She's a lost cause fellas. Let's do a bunch of unnecessary stuff."

  • @randyhuard5959
    @randyhuard5959 3 ปีที่แล้ว +108

    Six minutes in and still no water. We had a similar fire in my neighborhood and they were hosing it down within thirty seconds of arrival. Crazy.

    • @Berlinerisch
      @Berlinerisch 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      Yeah, this isn't an interesting video. It's evidence in a civil suit.

    • @engine2truck6
      @engine2truck6 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The water was in at 340

    • @ffjsb
      @ffjsb 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Berlinerisch You and Randy have NO IDEA of what you're talking about.

    • @bryanphillips6666
      @bryanphillips6666 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@ffjsb neither do you, they're renters, building has heavy fire insurance by the owners. Let it burn, the hell with the tenants. Civil suit!

    • @ffjsb
      @ffjsb 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@bryanphillips6666 Son, I've been on the job for nearly 40 years...

  • @frsantariga
    @frsantariga 3 ปีที่แล้ว +57

    Is there a drought in New Jersey?
    WATER. PLEASE 💦

  • @ericweiler6571
    @ericweiler6571 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    For the record, this channel's videos are unbelievable. His commentary is spot on. This guy is great

  • @CarTalesCrew
    @CarTalesCrew 3 ปีที่แล้ว +41

    Great video. Ladder truck got there and made the hydrant in good time which begs the question why didn't you guys use tank water while waiting on the hydrant. I'm fine with going into the building dry but once on the floor charge the line. I'm 6 mins in and I still see no water or fire being knocked down

    • @OwneyMadden430
      @OwneyMadden430 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      I agree with u brother 🤙🏽. I’m on the job 21 years , currently a Ladder co Captain, but I love when I get an OT shift on an Engine co ! Nothin beats putting a good knock a 🔥!! These fellas are vollies so I give them a bunch of props !! Yes they could have gotten quicker water on it if they went with tank water but all and all these boys did solid work here 🙏🏽

    • @ffjsb
      @ffjsb 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      On a short stretch like that I'd go right past the hyt, to set up and get a line off. Should be no problem for the hydrant man to stretch I00-200' of supply line by hand. If you look at 3:12 or so, you can see a DEFINITE change in the smoke to show that they've started putting water on the fire, but then something changes and they have to back out.

    • @Cthippo1
      @Cthippo1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@ffjsb The first guy went up with a P-can and I think he got a knock on it, but not enough to stop it and by opening the door gave it a flow path.

  • @HyperFoxTails
    @HyperFoxTails 3 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    Boy dose this fire department take it's sweet time on getting water on the fire, glad I don't live in Point Pleasant Beach.

    • @grumpycat4584
      @grumpycat4584 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I'm guessing you have never crawled into a hot dark smoke filled room.

    • @jackandsusangerstner1369
      @jackandsusangerstner1369 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      They need more trucks !

  • @jerrybuit3040
    @jerrybuit3040 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Great coverage. Thanks for sharing

  • @lindahoff7391
    @lindahoff7391 3 ปีที่แล้ว +26

    Well, that took a bit of time.

  • @mostrosticator
    @mostrosticator 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Wow...how long did it take for them to put any water on that fire? And why? 🤔

  • @timhill3330
    @timhill3330 2 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    In my 7 years in the fire service I'm pretty sure I learned that you need to be breathing air on your scba while on the roof

    • @jaysmith1408
      @jaysmith1408 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Not least of which is due to a possible roof collapse, then you’re now in the fire without scba.

    • @fdMT_EnGy
      @fdMT_EnGy 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      On my first job we popped the roof and I popped my cherry with a HUGE lung full of some heavy dark smoke. Tasted it for days. LOL

  • @ACorpseWithoutSoul
    @ACorpseWithoutSoul 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    No water over 5 minutes? Bravo guys!

  • @davidcarroll8735
    @davidcarroll8735 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    “Camera-1” first on scene. Good video!

  • @ericweiler6571
    @ericweiler6571 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    It's scary how fast that fire went from a little smoke to outright fire.. People, please be careful out there.

  • @PMAN-jj1hn
    @PMAN-jj1hn 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Nice work by the Brothers; if ya throw the ground ladder, place it between both windows to vent then roll into the window please!! Be safe gang......😎

  • @anthonybuono1604
    @anthonybuono1604 3 ปีที่แล้ว +59

    So if you have a white helmet you don't need SCBA to be on the roof? Really, Chief its 2021 not 1981.

    • @robthetinmang1455
      @robthetinmang1455 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      And the other guy is wearing his SCBA and doesn't use it. See that alot with videos out of NJ. Would hate to see their cancer rates!!!

    • @nw24153ns
      @nw24153ns 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I'm from "those days" and in 1981 we wore SCBAs whenever we were on a roof.

    • @jordanstone650
      @jordanstone650 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Not a smart practice or tactic

    • @astronwolf
      @astronwolf 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@robthetinmang1455 I see that outside of NJ. Officers don't use PPE, and their subordinates follow along. It's just bad leadership.

  • @tomcox6737
    @tomcox6737 3 ปีที่แล้ว +130

    I say again, why do fire departments have such a hatred of putting water on a fire? More than 5 minutes from arrival and no white smoke.

    • @speedyspooley
      @speedyspooley 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Unfortunately, it seems like old habits die hard. I said it in an other response, but the "pushing fire" theory and not hitting it from the outside when it's already vented was still being taught when I was a rookie 16 years ago. Tactics have changed and we now hit it from the outside in similar circumstances.
      I try not to go too hard on Monday Morning Quarterbacking...especially when it's not my city and I wasn't there....but it's fair to question why they wouldn't have put some water in those windows earlier.

    • @charlesgarvey5660
      @charlesgarvey5660 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Agree with your comment 100 %. They should have had water on that fire much sooner than they did

    • @tomcox6737
      @tomcox6737 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      @@charlesgarvey5660 There was a time period, where some FD attempted to outfit "Go Trucks". Small trucks with minimal equipment, 300 gallons of water, and enough 1.5 hose to just get some "first water" on small fires to slow down the fires enough to get the main apparatus in place. These go trucks could "dash" through traffic, similar to European style apparatus and do an initial knock down.
      .
      I've watched many videos of "nothing showing, or some smoke" turn into roaring flames when a wet wall or two would have allowed a full complement to arrive and quickly control the fire.

    • @ffjsb
      @ffjsb 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      That's not true if you KNOW what you're looking at. The ladder shows up around 1:20, and you can see a CLEAR change in the smoke start to happen at around 3:12. So by then they had started to put water on the fire. You don't know how many rooms they had to go through before the got to the room where the smoke and fire is venting.
      So being that it's the second floor of a large apartment building, I'd say that's not too bad, especially for a volunteer FD. We can get into whether a FD in a community that big should have a full time dept. though...
      BTW, white smoke is known as STEAM...

    • @speedyspooley
      @speedyspooley 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      @@ffjsb 16 years in the fire service...I know what I'm looking at, "chief".
      They screwed the pooch on this one. It happens. You are supposed to learn from your mistakes...not vehemently defend them.

  • @mattnew1773
    @mattnew1773 3 ปีที่แล้ว +44

    Perfect example of why you don't open doors until you have water ready. Great footage. Thanks 👍

    • @retiredfedleo6441
      @retiredfedleo6441 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Really hard to search without opening a door, eh?

    • @mattnew1773
      @mattnew1773 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@retiredfedleo6441
      Read the smoke. They went in and backed out 5 seconds later and waited for water. It almost rolled right over them first in guys with a dry line. This was a crazy close call. I'm glad it worked out. It's the little mistakes that get ya hurt. God bless

    • @JB91710
      @JB91710 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      @@mattnew1773 If they hit the windows within the first minute using tank water, they might have saved someone hiding under their bed in that room. THAT, is not only fast and safe it shows Thought and responsibility.

    • @michaeld.4521
      @michaeld.4521 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@mattnew1773 I think a couple of cans could have done the trick if done quickly.

    • @ek6063
      @ek6063 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@JB91710 so you’re saying throwing water through the window will save someone hiding under the bed better than going in and pulling them out? How does this work?

  • @firemaniran
    @firemaniran 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Great job 🚒
    Im sharing my missions

  • @billyclose3460
    @billyclose3460 3 ปีที่แล้ว +30

    This is ridiculous. I’m fresh off probation. After finishing the video I went to the comments to see if I was right about anything. Turns out I was right about everything lol. That could’ve been a real nice aggressive attack. But the initial attack line wasn’t charged and they didn’t open the hydrant until an eternity later. I’m sorry but this was one to get after and get a quick knock down and soak her after. Everything took way too long and they flooded the first saw. The best drills are the basics. The list goes on with this one. Hitting a hydrant, flaking out the attack line and charging it, put water on the fire, turn on a saw. I see a lot of European guys commenting and to you guys this is just a bad representation.

    • @frankiefire3968
      @frankiefire3968 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes absolutely unbelievable, that would not happen in the uk.

    • @ffjsb
      @ffjsb 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@frankiefire3968 Bullshit. You guys would've stood around in the front yard with your garden hose trying to hit it through the windows...

    • @ffjsb
      @ffjsb 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Probie, you need to get some time on, because you clearly don't know what you're talking about.

    • @speedyspooley
      @speedyspooley 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@ffjsb Bullshit. The kid is right. This was a weak effort.

  • @cgrayson8011
    @cgrayson8011 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    The test to get into that department must be super easy. Cause I can stand around for 10 mins looking at a fire too

    • @madmaximilian5783
      @madmaximilian5783 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hey @C Grayson its really hard to believe that these guys ever trained for their jobs. They really looked confused as hell about what to do...🤔

  • @himbeerjack
    @himbeerjack 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Jean, we need more holes in the roof… instead uesing the water …. And i think smashing more Windows will help ….

    • @windage
      @windage 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      they didn't try the latch to raise it..couldn't find it from the inside...

  • @peterarvanitis6497
    @peterarvanitis6497 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Good job on the clip

  • @rd4660
    @rd4660 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Can I get some water on the fire?

  • @toddayres7298
    @toddayres7298 3 ปีที่แล้ว +35

    I worked on a smaller department. Our initial response was 4 guys until mutual aid arrived so I get it. The only problem I have....... and it always seem to be the white helmet guys....... is get the hell off the roof if you don't have the proper PPE.. Air pack maybe?

    • @mathewpiccioni5963
      @mathewpiccioni5963 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Was very surprised to see lack of scba by a few

    • @speedyspooley
      @speedyspooley 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@mathewpiccioni5963 - Didn't see any roof ladders either. It's constructive criticism, not a trash & bash session...but PPE, roof ladders....and maybe an initial hit from the outside.
      Anyone on the job knows it's easy to find fault after the fact...but we should always be open to a post-fire critique.

    • @mathewpiccioni5963
      @mathewpiccioni5963 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@speedyspooley completely agree. I’m not bashing by any means so I hope to clarify that. I am no pro.... I’m just surprised to see that. Perhaps using the halligan to vent was his only option for example as all other tools may have been in use. We are not there, but... basic PPE is crucial to ones safety. I wouldn’t be caught doing that. It’s just my opinion. Either way, these guys are daily heroes and I am sure did a great job controlling spread to exposures.

    • @mikef3855
      @mikef3855 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Absolutely agree with the roof operations and lack of SCBA. I nearly fell through a roof, thank god I did not. If I did, my SCBA would at least given me a second chance if I survived the fall into the attic.

    • @FromGamingwithLove0456
      @FromGamingwithLove0456 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I’d be pulling ceilings before I was putting anyone on a roof- almost ever. And yeah that Chief bitch slapping the roof with a Halligan was just irksome, useless and just unprofessional.

  • @russelljr4026
    @russelljr4026 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Hope everyone got out in time and are ok! 🙏

  • @tmilesffl
    @tmilesffl 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Interesting that the first person who showed on the scene called in "Heavy Smoke" cause I didn't see heavy smoke. I did notice the absence of any smoke alarms going off.

  • @jadendeyoung4151
    @jadendeyoung4151 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Rest in peace to the Dog that was still inside the Apartment when the Room was on fire

  • @davemarshall706
    @davemarshall706 3 ปีที่แล้ว +30

    You could just throw water through the windows and keep things under contol. Read the smoke.

    • @ffjsb
      @ffjsb 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      That's not true at all. They were making an interior attack and had to back out. Then they regrouped and went back in.

    • @jaysmith1408
      @jaysmith1408 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@ffjsb in the mean time, lob water through the window, either while interior is enroute, or while they’ve backed out.

    • @BassistFF
      @BassistFF 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ffjsb they definitely could have blitzed to check it. Not the biggest fan of it, but with taking that long to get to the fire it shouldve been employed

    • @ffjsb
      @ffjsb 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@BassistFF By the time the fire started to show out the windows, they were well committed to interior attack. If fire was showing on arrival, a transitional attack would be appropriate.

  • @paulor2
    @paulor2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    It is really frustrating the size of the apparatus and the low effectiveness due to the slowness of the actions. Here in Brazil, a team in a truck would control the fire in a few minutes with a much faster approach to the fire, due to the different strategies used.

  • @adamant8235
    @adamant8235 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    6 minutes to put water on the fire..... your kidding right, what a disgrace.
    A minute or so of water in the window early would have saved so much but nooooooo

    • @FromGamingwithLove0456
      @FromGamingwithLove0456 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Would have ruined the whole apartment too- saving what exactly?
      The undisciplined door control on the main entrance / and the door to the apartment is what ruined this apartment... 125 gallons of water sprayed in the window may have hit the fire... may have just hit all around it and put it out by accident while ruining the floor, leaking into the downstairs apartments and created- potentially- a bigger problem.
      I can tell those of you who know what you're talking about from those of you who do not- water or lack thereof was not what caused the fire to take up and ruin so much of the space... undisciplined door control was.

  • @blujeans9462
    @blujeans9462 3 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    Got to give some credit to the builders too. For a fire that intense and remain in one apartment, is amazing.

    • @MegaUnclesalty
      @MegaUnclesalty 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Fire walls

    • @ffjsb
      @ffjsb 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@MegaUnclesalty Nope, that's standard drywall for you.

  • @jz1340
    @jz1340 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great Catch.....

  • @davej-r9153
    @davej-r9153 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Just a tip for American firefighters it helps if you put water on the fire.

    • @FromGamingwithLove0456
      @FromGamingwithLove0456 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      And sometimes it does more damage than it resolves in the presence of other options.
      I mean yeah- water is great... it also does tremendous amounts of damage unnecessarily. If they'd just done 1 thing a little differently they'd have had a miraculous save with minimal damage and an intact fire scene resulting in a better chance to find a cause... instead of it remaining under investigation.

  • @jonathanlee7355
    @jonathanlee7355 3 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    I'm curious what they learned from this fire. It's been over 10 years since I left the FD, but this was waaay too much time with no water. Maybe things have changed? Surprisingly, u need very little water to start containing a fire.

    • @felixpolnasekjr.9049
      @felixpolnasekjr.9049 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I lived through an arson fire and because of political township shit They let it burn when it could have been put out in 5 to 10 minutes ! I lost everything unnecessarily

    • @user-zq5gy2ri6o
      @user-zq5gy2ri6o 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Garden hose!

  • @mrinfelix4574
    @mrinfelix4574 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Not sure what part of the insurance company that you guys work for but here in the U.K when we arrive we put water on it, fire doesn't seem to like water, nice to see you spent 6 minutes getting the ladder ready and someone on the roof.

    • @cjritchie9701
      @cjritchie9701 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      So what? Your Gona spray water on light smoke through a window on arrival? I know you don’t know much about interior, but it takes a little time

  • @bevcamren1316
    @bevcamren1316 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Excellent reporting in your write-up very succinct and informing thank you my storage is full but as soon as I can I will subscribe to you

  • @Accu53Mation
    @Accu53Mation 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    That's our kitchen every time my wife cooks.

  • @tamietaylor8620
    @tamietaylor8620 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I thought I was the only one that thought this was a damn farce... Until I came to the comments 🤷

  • @JZ909
    @JZ909 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    As a guy who uses chainsaws regularly for work, I'm wondering what is going on with that chainsaw. In a situation like this, I would have preferred the saw already on before it was brought up to the roof, it's easier and safer to start it on the ground, and it's better to solve any problems there than on the roof of a burning building. However, at bare minimum, the saw should be ready to go when it gets up there. It's hard to see what the guy is doing, but it looks like the guy is tensioning the chain. He's certainly not doing anything related to starting the saw.

  • @windage
    @windage 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Chief Thoms taught us to open windows instead of breaking them...some even tilt in to remove..much safer than broken glass shards.

  • @jacksonherr1752
    @jacksonherr1752 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Great Video of A Real Fire

  • @michaelv.1107
    @michaelv.1107 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Wow, yesterday's technology. Line up to the appartment charged at 4:14, visible progress four minutes later. Tanker truck with solid hose on reel (common in Europe) in comparison is ready to attack in under a minute. Tanker trucks save lives and protects property, need less FF personnel and time for set up.

  • @briannash1982
    @briannash1982 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Enough White Helmets to crew two engines at least if not more!. In most cases here in the UK we attack a fire a lot quicker than you guys.

  • @chrishilton5439
    @chrishilton5439 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for the info. I never realized there was heavy fire coming from the second floor!!!🤣🤣🤣🤣

  • @jasonbailey4148
    @jasonbailey4148 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    same in Canada water wright away. i am glad no one got hurt RIP for the dog..

  • @jackh577
    @jackh577 3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Looks like nice work overall. The White Helmet on the roof should have a pack on, and you don't vent a roof with a halligan.

    • @LTBROYT6A
      @LTBROYT6A 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      They took way too long to put water on the fire !!!

    • @derrickharvey7487
      @derrickharvey7487 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      the white helmet should not have been on the roof.......unless he stole the helmet....

  • @woodstockenvy4666
    @woodstockenvy4666 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Great catch .. it's nice to see the police position their vehicle "out of the way" for firefighters. Too often, they park in the way.

    • @gavinschwartz5677
      @gavinschwartz5677 ปีที่แล้ว

      Great catch? They dropped the ball big time!

  • @mattboyle3161
    @mattboyle3161 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    water when you guys think about pouting that small fire out my god about 40 guys the giu with the loud speaker is he on a war movie

  • @astronwolf
    @astronwolf 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Guy hooks up the 5-inch to the hydrant @ 1:24...and runs away before flowing water @ 1:57. Only part of the call I didn't understand. Attack line went in @ 2:15. Flames showing at 2:30. Someone else had to open the hydrant @ 3:30. They charged into a burning building with a bumper line? Better than nothing I guess. Water started flowing to the first attack line over a minute later maybe @ 3:47? Second line goes in @ 4:53. Get the chainsaw! @ 5:25 apartment fully involved three minutes after first attack line went in. @5:50 I think interior attack may reached the windows, smoke changes color, and a minute later the fire that was showing was out. What would you guys have done differently? Sounds to me like they encountered low visibility in cramped conditions on the second floor. The apartment might have been full of junk. No way was that water can enough, but good on them that they gave it a shot.

  • @AbbeyRoad52
    @AbbeyRoad52 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    “Dig in, dig in God damn it!”

  • @timc0ffin444
    @timc0ffin444 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    One question the later crew on roof why didn't they have a second way of egress off the roof while ventilating

    • @ek6063
      @ek6063 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      How do you know they didn’t, did you see the other side of the building?

  • @juliemodun4149
    @juliemodun4149 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    First time I’ve seen a Truck lay in, very cool!

  • @ActionOfTheDay
    @ActionOfTheDay 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    damn good catch!

  • @jole3799
    @jole3799 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I’m so sorry for the residents house got on fire in Jersey shore i will praying for all you guys lost your home

    • @ekop1778
      @ekop1778 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      THIS PLACE IS A SCITT PITT
      PLACE REEKS OF TRASH AND PEOPLE ARE JUST MORONS

  • @lilwoowoo884
    @lilwoowoo884 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Another fine example of "you get what you pay for" in terms of fire protection.
    #SameJob
    #SameCerts
    #Training
    #JustAsGoodAsProfessionals

  • @ilovejesuschrist621
    @ilovejesuschrist621 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    God Bless F/F! True and THE BEST hero’s of first responders! 🚑❤️🚒🇺🇸

  • @TheTemporary
    @TheTemporary 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Just wondering. Would it have been worth using a hose and water from the front of the building to help put the fire out?? All those fire fighters and equipment...but no water?? Doesn't make any sense.

  • @iamstorii
    @iamstorii 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Wow. I've only been a firefighter for five years but even I know enough to put the wet stuff on the red stuff. What were they waiting for? Are they stuck on the myth that water pushes fire? They didn't need to use a deck gun with people inside - a 1 3/4 handline from outside could have knocked that down enough to give the interior crew time to get to the fire. SMH. Am I missing something?? Tunnel vision? Too worried about venting to actually put some water on it?

  • @IansOddInterests
    @IansOddInterests 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I’ve seen this on many USA vs U.K. fires...the USA ones take a long time to make a first strike with water...do the USA fire depts not carry smaller hoses or reels to hit a fire quick? Totally different techniques.. UK fight internally for small internal fires , USA seem to stand above fire breaking through structure from above ?

    • @l.halsey2991
      @l.halsey2991 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Check put the city of Stockton, California. Those guys get it done.

    • @ffjsb
      @ffjsb 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      You clearly know NOTHING about US Firefighters.

    • @IansOddInterests
      @IansOddInterests 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ffjsb I know, that’s why I asked the question do USA fire appliances have water tanks like U.K. ones...I was looking at U.K. ones they carry up to 2000L of water with small hoses to tackle fires quickly having to plug into a water hydrant first would take a long time.

    • @Cthippo1
      @Cthippo1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@IansOddInterests The general thinking in the US is that nothing smaller than a 1 1/2" line at 150 GPM (600-ish LPM) will do the job against a fire. Some apparatus carry smaller booster lines for dumpsters, outdoor fires, etc, but they are not used for interior firefighting. The concern is that a booster line may not put out enough water to overcome the heat generated in a flashover situation. It's a philosophical difference between bringing a tool that will probably work, but might not be big enough or bringing one that will almost certainly work, but might be overkill and is slower to deploy.

    • @JS-zb1vv
      @JS-zb1vv 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yes lacking a lot !! Sorta like American fire trucks are more for show than for functional purposes!! American firefighters are more stuck on traditional stuff than newer tactics. The older guys are thinking they will be phased out because of it and don’t want change!!

  • @Dan-O40
    @Dan-O40 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    If I were a fireman, I would be ashamed to show this.

  • @me7690
    @me7690 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Yes, we see the heavy fire thanks.

  • @TheTommyboy1971
    @TheTommyboy1971 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Nice to see them use hydraulic ventilation. While their technique could use some fine tuning, it is a great tool to keep in mind and I believe it should be used more often.

    • @RckyMtneer
      @RckyMtneer 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I saw that too, but there would not have been as much of a need if they were more proficient at getting the wet stuff on the red stuff a lot faster, and the white helmet had not gone upstairs and opened the door to provide more air to the fire before they were all ready.

  • @drewski8138
    @drewski8138 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    A master stream for the outside would’ve been useful while the tower is getting set up

  • @ohjumpa
    @ohjumpa 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    It's always so funny to watch US firefighter (and police)! Greetings from Europe, get well soon, dear USA!

    • @tiffanyreid4084
      @tiffanyreid4084 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Even the Canadian police and firefighters are better then those

  • @johndelaney9399
    @johndelaney9399 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    How come, with the aerial bucket right there, they didn't just hit the windows with a monitor line?

  • @DC-ih8bv
    @DC-ih8bv 3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Nice job by the lads. Yes we do things different in the big city ...but we have the manpower to do so. These guys have aerial ladders operating like an engine companies at first..dropping hose lines and hooking up while taking exposure one. Different way of doing things but facing the same beast. Great work. Glad all are ok..except for the dog.

    • @rd4660
      @rd4660 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      The neighbors are not so sad about the dog dying.

    • @charlesgarvey5660
      @charlesgarvey5660 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      They did a horrible job. That department definitely needs training. It's embarrassing to other fire departments

    • @ffjsb
      @ffjsb 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@charlesgarvey5660 No. Just NO. Not the best job ever, but at least average, especially for a VFD.

    • @charlesgarvey5660
      @charlesgarvey5660 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      They did a terrible job getting water on that fire. It took way to long. I don't care if there volunteer or paid.

    • @shawndauber6488
      @shawndauber6488 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@ffjsb not every Voly is like this. My Department would of had water on the 3 minutes earlier because of the training we do and how aggressive we are.

  • @hihfty
    @hihfty 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    This is a case into why pre planning and "highrise ops" is critical when dealing with apartment buildings. I know not every fire is perfect but there are some learning points that can be made here. Engine companies are so used to spreading hose in the front yard and having only a small working load at the front door. Apartment buildings generally warrant having a majority of that hose inside at the stairway landing. Having a majority of your hose in the front yard is not advantageous to the crew on the nozzle who now have to drag all the hose back inside and upstairs/around corners. As far as vent group goes, know how to start a saw and wear your PPE. Also you shouldn't have to pry open your holes, a work around is just cut another line right down the middle and they should just fall in with a poke.

    • @PMAN-jj1hn
      @PMAN-jj1hn 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Lack of exposure, they did fine!!

    • @hihfty
      @hihfty 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@PMAN-jj1hn I agree! But we we can always learn from these videos and share accepted practices in the comments that have worked for departments who encounter these buildings everyday.

    • @jackh577
      @jackh577 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Sloppy stretch for sure.

  • @drewski8138
    @drewski8138 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I love how y’all set a ladder up for a firefighter egress

  • @greglattanzio3683
    @greglattanzio3683 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    You've heard of the Keystone Kops? These must be the Keystone Firemen. Do something!

  • @edloeffler9769
    @edloeffler9769 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Why was a CHIEF on the roof doing ventilation without SCBA?????

    • @ffjsb
      @ffjsb 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      You can't be salty standing there with the accountability board...

  • @marshanotmarcia7433
    @marshanotmarcia7433 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    This is probably a very ignorant question, but the fire seemed to be smoldering, than all of a sudden, BOOM. it that because the crew opened the door to get at it? Wonderful team work!, btw!!

    • @jozotheclown30
      @jozotheclown30 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      What you saw was most likely all of the gases and particles in the smoke beginning to ignite because the temp in the room was increasing, which usually causes a rollover/flashover. The windows were already broken out so the fire was getting plenty of oxygen So opening the door would have little to no effect

    • @jerseyshorefireresponse
      @jerseyshorefireresponse  3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      yes just like joey said

    • @ecw5394
      @ecw5394 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Not ignorant at all and a very valid question. I wasn't there so I don't know the facts, but it seems likely there was another introduction of oxygen. The video is edited at 2:30 so it's a little hard to know for sure, but there was no observable fire inside the room prior to the flames venting out the windows. After they do, you can clearly see fire on the inside. If this was a flashover, we should have already seen the orange glow in the windows. Oxygen could have entered several ways and it could have been due to the crew opening the door. If the windows were already broken, then perhaps a wind change allowed more air to enter. If it was from crew entry, then they likely knew exactly what they were doing or they got very, very lucky that there wasn't a backdraft.

    • @jerseyshorefireresponse
      @jerseyshorefireresponse  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ecw5394 that happened when the crew entered the unit.

    • @jozotheclown30
      @jozotheclown30 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@ecw5394 you sir are correct. I didn’t think of the wind effect of the fire.
      I’m actually quite surprised that there was no extension to the next apartment based off the flames.

  • @JBart3112
    @JBart3112 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Not saying that you don’t get a water supply, but this fire should have been knocked with what’s in the tank. And don’t get me started on:
    - Having to go up and down aerial for a saw that’ll start
    - Trying to open vent hole with a prying tool
    - Performing vert vent without SCBA
    - More white helmets on scene than an FDNY five alarm fire
    - Guys who can’t operate their own SCBA main valve because they can’t reach it
    Seems like more of a social club than a fire department.

  • @petercrean5176
    @petercrean5176 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I almost thought these guys were wildland, and they were trying to start a back burn with how long they let the fire go before putting water on it 🤣🤣

  • @colinturner6628
    @colinturner6628 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Most of the fire crews just stood and watched, need to get some training on the use of water on the fire normally helps. Watch some fire crews here in the UK they will show you how to put a fire out.

  • @Critical911
    @Critical911 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Wow! At 2:30 you can see that Fire creepin out then shortly after the gases in that smoke ignited! This is what scares me about apartments. Great video man again! What camera do you use? Quality is incredible!

  • @ernstz1004
    @ernstz1004 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    It's only on the second floor...
    Shouldn't it be suppressed right away?
    I think it can be done later on raising the ladder...

  • @TRUCKYOUTRUDEAU
    @TRUCKYOUTRUDEAU ปีที่แล้ว

    It looks like they took a while to get water in there... But, it's possible they had lines from the inside or the back of the building...

  • @sccz13
    @sccz13 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hello everyone. I work as a firefighter in Russia. I believe that the first unit that arrived, in addition to the first aid barrel for extinguishing inside the building, could also give another barrel from the facade to prevent the spread along the facade of the building, and even slightly extinguish through the window opening, until the moment when the link inside the building is ready to submit the barrel for extinguishing.

    • @MichaelDeSanta.
      @MichaelDeSanta. ปีที่แล้ว

      I was a firefighter in Germany and we try to minimize damage by water, could be the cause here. Also there is a myth among many American Fire Departments wich says that you push the fire inside when your extinguishing it from the outside wich is completely wrong.

  • @marcbach5880
    @marcbach5880 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Heavy smoke? You must be kinda new at this.

    • @jerseyshorefireresponse
      @jerseyshorefireresponse  3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Heavy smoke!!!! I even weighed it. Was like 1,300 pounds of smoke!!!

  • @stv2613
    @stv2613 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Not a good job at all. Fireman on roof with no headgear on? Door opened before water line available?

  • @bill-nj6fc
    @bill-nj6fc 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    yeah you got heavy fire, why, how long did take to get water on it, should never got that bad

  • @lawrencekirwin9665
    @lawrencekirwin9665 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great job brothers. I’m not a Monday morning quarterback so I’ll leave you with this. Shit happens but the Axe always starts.

  • @Goober10584
    @Goober10584 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    These guys need to do some research on transitional attacks. Can greatly slow the fire and give any victims inside a much better chance of survival. A smooth bore thru those windows from the exterior could of cooled the room and surrounding rooms, buying more time for both victims and firefighters.

    • @MoparGuy1625
      @MoparGuy1625 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hit it hard from the yard!

  • @kristofersmith5476
    @kristofersmith5476 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Need a lil work on interior attacking.

  • @tamraanne4066
    @tamraanne4066 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good gravy! All those trucks and men and no water.

  • @tonysers11
    @tonysers11 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Question, why does it so long afther the fire department shows for the water to start flowing. ???

  • @jeremyleppington5526
    @jeremyleppington5526 3 ปีที่แล้ว +27

    Great role modeling by white helmet on roof. Oh well, seemed like there were enough white helmets to go around.

    • @roidragingpuppy
      @roidragingpuppy 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I guess IDLH doesn't hurt him... No SCBA for him!

    • @brianjeffiers4283
      @brianjeffiers4283 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      His striking technique is on point at 7:11...looked like he was puffing the air out from under a fitted sheet.

    • @thomasvilleneuve1253
      @thomasvilleneuve1253 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@brianjeffiers4283 I hope its sarcasm lol

    • @MegaUnclesalty
      @MegaUnclesalty 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      The great white wave. No wonder this scene looked like a cluster fuck

  • @bobcallahan2274
    @bobcallahan2274 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Frustrated. A line from the exterior flowing into the windows while they were stretching the interior line would have made all the difference in this fire. There is absolutely nothing wrong with hitting from the exterior and resetting the fire while the interior attack crews and moving line to the fire area. Not trying to second guess but the research has shown that an exterior line can significantly reduce heat, fire spread and fire growth until the interior line can be placed in service. (40 year fire service member and 30 plus year instructor)

    • @bamrak2000
      @bamrak2000 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I came here to ask this. The tower ladder had water flowing from the hydrant at the 2 minute mark. It seems like a knockdown with the ladder nozzle would have made a huge difference. At the 5 minute mark the first attack hose is still outside the building and not charged. It was almost at the 7 minute mark until you saw a change in the smoke.

    • @skidude8989
      @skidude8989 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Why can't people just come on here and just say " good job. They got a good knock and controlled the fire. There was no need to go defensive UNLESS the interior crew could, for some reason, not be able to get to the fire.

    • @bamrak2000
      @bamrak2000 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@skidude8989 Because they believe it wasn't a good job? It's not a single family dwelling, so it seems like initial knockdown might be more beneficial than say, over 6 minutes to get water on the fire.

    • @FromGamingwithLove0456
      @FromGamingwithLove0456 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Respectfully- I disagree.
      I mean... yeah- you'd have put the fire out and ruined the whole apartment and flooded the ones below. We're great saving a house from 5000 dollars of fire damage by doing 50000 dollars water damage to it.
      And yes- when the fire has been allowed to develop, is running efficiently with a unidirectional flow that supplies it with everything it needs to grow- NO ARGUMENT with you... none. Hit it... but in this case? So many people in this case are just "water water water water water water water water" when a ladder with a couple of draft curtains would have put this thing out. Sure, you usually draft curtains on doors but hey- why not a window. I'm asking... why not?
      Fire on arrival- let's look at that. That was not heavy smoke showing... that was barely smoke showing. Low velocity- extremely low density... dark but we expect that... the fire is burning inefficiently... The fire was clearly- CLEARLY- vent limited. You say you're a fire guy or were or whatever and you're saying all the things that suggest that you (too) have seen the NIST / UL science and seems you understand it at least 10% of it. You got the terms maybe not the science and why its relevant and how it was intended to be applied.
      Look at the very inefficient bi-directional flow at the windows. The thing is barely getting any traction in there... huffing and puffing for air through the lower space of the broken window while the smoke it produces is trying equally hard to push out through the top. It's as straightforward as anyone can make it... NIST / UL should use this video in their flowpath science presentations it's that basic. And you're on about "hard from the yard and dog from the bog" or whatever the latest cliche is.
      And the guys on scene- at least one guy with a white helmet- seem to realize that; early on we see a guy with a water can making his way up there. No gloves- just wandering in with no mask on ... Everything right up to the door of the involved apartment is a cakewalk.
      And the can would have done it... if ventilation had been rigidly controlled which it obviously wasn't. There was a delay- whatever it was- from the time the door opened to when they found the fire and put water on it. No thermal camera? No charged hoseline ready? Left the door of the apartment open to improve ventilation? As stupid as that sounds... hey let's put guys on the roof to cut a hole in it. Every opportunity to follow fresh air straight in to the seat... burp a little water- done. A little natural ventilation... maybe the hydraulic the one guy does for a bit... PPV if there's one out there... why not?
      Anyway- I should probably know better to even care about guys in here waving their "instructor this and service that" like it means anything if they're just going to staple it to useless cliches that don't apply to the video.. The concept isn't useless- but a person should recognize when that's the solution to the CURRENT situation versus just an available option for other very specific circumstances.

    • @FromGamingwithLove0456
      @FromGamingwithLove0456 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@skidude8989 First- I agree. The number of people in here talking out their ass is astonishing. Certainly to some of them I'm doing the same thing so... there's that. Take the rest of what I'm saying with a grain of salt on account of that alone if you wish.
      On another note- it isn't "going defensive" if you're going to hit it from the outside first in the interest of making conditions inside safer to enter... this is "transitional." This is a signal (if properly announced on the radio) to incoming apparatus that the next due is going to be supporting an offensive attack. This is usually if the fire is no longer vent limited- and is free burning. Most of the people in here honking about water first and ask questions later are referring to a transitional attack and in many cases they're not wrong at all.
      In this case, they're all very, very wrong.
      This fire wasn't going anywhere. It was vent limited in spite of the broken windows... It wasn't getting enough air since the rest of the apartment was closed up and was fuel rich probably on account of newer furnishings readily offgassing. They could have hung out for 30 minutes and seen very little change in the fire. Get a backup line, water supply, utilities isolated, other apartments evacuated, have a piss... THEN Pull the trigger on YOUR terms. Some departments call this operational mode "Preparing" though I don't see it often it is absolutely applicable in this scenario though technically the fire did vent it had no traction to build up any flame
      But when that involved apartment door opened and stayed opened and water wasn't applied?
      That, my dude, that is where the squirrel ran back up the toilet paper roll.

  • @bryantlehman2418
    @bryantlehman2418 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Arm chair quarterbacking here for sure but why did they not do a quick hit to take away the intensity of that fire?

  • @ronbradley5631
    @ronbradley5631 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    That department needs to go back through training. Everything from how to hook a hydrant to venting a roof. The officer on the roof without his SCBA on needs to be written up.

    • @johnrockie5270
      @johnrockie5270 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Yeah, that crosslay flake was horrible. Those two FFs @ 1:53 need to start stretching and learning how turn their SCBAs on their own lol

    • @johnphillips2426
      @johnphillips2426 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@man4054 One members actions can kill many members. Remember that!

    • @Goober10584
      @Goober10584 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@man4054 Fire was knocked down very quick? Did we watch the same video lol

    • @johnphillips2426
      @johnphillips2426 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Glad to see that thing left. He was killing brain cells

    • @ronbradley5631
      @ronbradley5631 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@johnphillips2426 you are correct.