Testing Cleaning Products: UV light Wand VS Bacteria!

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 24 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 140

  • @myrandabrown
    @myrandabrown หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    Ive installed UV sanitation in air handlers and in medical rooms. Even if that wand had the correct wavelengths it just doesn’t have the intensity required for that short exposure time. It would probably be successful on your p-dishes if you laid it directly on top for about 20-60 minutes.
    Love your channel and your no nonsense delivery. I look forward to your next video.

    • @FieldOfFocus
      @FieldOfFocus  หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I just test products to see if their claims match real world applications. So in this case I tested the claims that the UV wand can remove bacteria. And we can all see the results! Thank you for watching and commenting!!

  • @Leona147741
    @Leona147741 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

    The way the use of uv light was explained to me, by a waste water treatment worker is that the light inhibits the ability of the bacteria to reproduce, not kill bacteria.

    • @shoe_thompsano
      @shoe_thompsano หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      That makes sense-since UV light is literally radiation damage, and radiation damage destroys DNA, leaving cells too damaged to divide. (I heard a story about a Japanese man with radiation poisoning where his tissues _'unalived'_ at different rates because none of his cells could replicate-the DNA inside them was mush. Yikes.)
      So, commercially, these wands might be misleading-they're not really sanitizers; they're more like inhibitors and probably should be used to maintain an already sterilized area. Nice, I feel like I learned something from your comment!

    • @doradean3097
      @doradean3097 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Great info, thanks!

    • @lisasim
      @lisasim หลายเดือนก่อน

      True, it causes damage to the DNA and by that interferes with duplication and cell division.

    • @FieldOfFocus
      @FieldOfFocus  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      YES! So that is one reason why these wands are gimmicky in my opinion.

  • @M.Campbell
    @M.Campbell หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    I cannot tell if you removed the top of the dish, or not, before using the light. Shining it through the closed top would make a huge difference. Thank you for testing the UV wand.

    • @FieldOfFocus
      @FieldOfFocus  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I did test it both ways.. both gave the same results....

  • @puddintang8034
    @puddintang8034 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Good video, these lights are upsells in air conditioners in the south. An a/c unit with one of the uvlights is quite a bit more expensive than a conventional a/c unit. Good video.

    • @shawnsg
      @shawnsg หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      UV light does work. That wand thing is basically a toy though assuming it's even real.

    • @FieldOfFocus
      @FieldOfFocus  หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      UV lights are used in lab hoods, but there is no way that this wand is the same as those!

  • @michelepropst9009
    @michelepropst9009 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

    I eas wondering if the reduced bacteria in the two sinks came from simply the wiping action of the swab? Maybe the quantity on the surface was mechanically reduced.
    I love your videos and watching them has given me a lot of peace of mind about trusting the products I use and feel less anxiety about cleaning! Thank you!!

    • @mementomori7266
      @mementomori7266 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I was wondering that, too.

    • @kindredanastasia
      @kindredanastasia หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      there is a previous video testing just wiping/rubbing with a cloth/paper towel.

    • @FieldOfFocus
      @FieldOfFocus  หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      If you watch any of my other tests you will see that just swabbing does not remove bacteria.. The closest video I have of this is here:
      Can Water & Paper Towels to Remove Bacteria??! - Tested with Petri Dishes th-cam.com/video/BeER2i2Gqw4/w-d-xo.html

    • @michelepropst9009
      @michelepropst9009 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@FieldOfFocus Thanks! I missed that one!

  • @HeHut
    @HeHut หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    I always assumed all those sanitizing lights were a scam. I still feel that way.

    • @FieldOfFocus
      @FieldOfFocus  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yes me too... these wands do not have the same level of UV light that is used in lab hoods.

  • @margot_78
    @margot_78 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

    That's somewhat disappointing. I was hoping to purchase a UV light sanitizer. Thank you so much for your detailed work. Love your channel!!!

    • @shoe_thompsano
      @shoe_thompsano หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      My thoughts exactly!

    • @FieldOfFocus
      @FieldOfFocus  หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      This one is just not that great... Hospitals and Labs use UV and there is no way this wand is the same strength as those. Thanks for watching!

    • @margot_78
      @margot_78 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@FieldOfFocus yeah, those must be way more efficient than the one you tested. But maybe there are better brands out there, but probably much more costly.

    • @doxasticc
      @doxasticc 21 วันที่ผ่านมา

      These test result didn't seem so bad to me. I was kind of impressed how much it reduced bacteria in only 10 seconds. You need much longer exposure times to get drinking water to an acceptable log reduction when using portable devices. The longer tests sounded like they were done on bacteria that's already colonized, which UV wouldn't have an effect on, but that doesn't matter when it comes to disease.

  • @shoe_thompsano
    @shoe_thompsano หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    I give this video 10 out of 5 stars-do you have any hypothesis or possible explanation for why it seemed to work relatively well on sink areas but nowhere else?

    • @FieldOfFocus
      @FieldOfFocus  หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Thank you so very much!!! It could be the type of bacteria or surface ... overall though, I am not encouraging the purchase of these wands.

  • @holliluc3497
    @holliluc3497 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    I do see a few good uses for this product
    1) For electronics. They sell UV light boxes to put your phone into, but if you could turn on wand and hanging it over your laptop, leave it on a timer for say 10 minutes when you come back from launch your laptop has had a good cleaning
    2) They do sell UV lights to stick to the lid of your toilet, I do think this will prove to be a good additional toilet cleaner, because every time you close the lid the light comes on to clean... Obviously not a replacement but a good addition
    3) Water containers, UV lights are built into a lot of water bottles, but they could also be used to keep water tanks clean
    I do believe you are right that UV products are not a replacement for cleaning. But I do think they could make a good addition

    • @shoe_thompsano
      @shoe_thompsano หลายเดือนก่อน

      I hope my tone comes off as inquisitive, not obnoxious, but after watching this video, why do you think UV light is useful at all? From what I gathered, UV light as a sterilizer seems rather gimmicky-at least for the commercial wands you can buy. Industrial UV lights used in labs are probably very effective as they do use them, but the consumer versions don’t seem functional, yeah?

    • @shawnsg
      @shawnsg หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@@shoe_thompsanowell UV light is germicidal. It's just that wand thing is nonsense. It'd be like throwing a cup of water on a bonfire and then saying that water must not work since it didn't put it out.

    • @FieldOfFocus
      @FieldOfFocus  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @shawnsg EXACTLY! Lab UV lights in hoods are not the same as this Amazon wand light.

    • @holliluc3497
      @holliluc3497 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@shoe_thompsano It is all about the amount of time and the intensity of the light. You are not going to stand around holding a UV light over something for an hour. But for places in your home that do get dirty often you could say add a UV light permanently and turn it on for an hour after you have finished doing what ever. So for example, I just saw yesterday a UV light toothbrush holder and cleaner. Now if that UV light is on your toothbrush all day then it most likely would clean it. But if it is on for 30 seconds than it would not do anything

  • @PlushFairytale
    @PlushFairytale หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Omg I’ve been anticipating for this video

    • @FieldOfFocus
      @FieldOfFocus  28 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      I hope you enjoyed it!!! Thanks for watching!

  • @alysal2568
    @alysal2568 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thank you for saving us the time and money 😊

    • @FieldOfFocus
      @FieldOfFocus  หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you for watching and commenting!

  • @lhallmbp8914
    @lhallmbp8914 18 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Thank you for this test. I was considering purchasing one for travel. It looks like I can save my money.

    • @FieldOfFocus
      @FieldOfFocus  14 วันที่ผ่านมา

      You are welcome!

  • @sueg2658
    @sueg2658 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Interesting test. Thank you.

    • @FieldOfFocus
      @FieldOfFocus  หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks for watching!

  • @AWanderingEye
    @AWanderingEye หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Once again, FofF does NOT fail to deliver! The Channel for those who NEED to KNOW! Thanks!

    • @FieldOfFocus
      @FieldOfFocus  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thank you so much for your kind words!!!!!!!!!! ❤️😊

  • @barbaraberwick8993
    @barbaraberwick8993 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I think the decrease that was seen in the bathroom and kitchen sink is really related to the fact that before the UV wand was used you cleaned the area with the cotton-tipped applicator. You really covered almost the entire area with that swab. Otherwise, if it worked

    • @FieldOfFocus
      @FieldOfFocus  หลายเดือนก่อน

      If you watch my other videos you will see that the swab alone does not remove bacteria. So I do not think that contributed at all.

  • @julianneedsblood7091
    @julianneedsblood7091 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Nice! ❤😎

    • @FieldOfFocus
      @FieldOfFocus  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thank you! 😊

  • @mscatnipper2359
    @mscatnipper2359 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thank you for saving me time and money on this product. Perhaps there are other ways to use UV light(inside a box, for instance) and in stronger concentrations that would produce better results, but this was great info.

    • @FieldOfFocus
      @FieldOfFocus  หลายเดือนก่อน

      I would love to test more UV products, but right now I don't earn enough through TH-cam yet to purchase more or more expensive ones. Some day!

  • @pandoravictoria9541
    @pandoravictoria9541 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Great video I couldn't wait to watch. I was thinking about getting one for the laptop and remote controls and Xbox controllers

    • @FieldOfFocus
      @FieldOfFocus  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I hope it helped you.. personally I am not a fan of the UV wand (or at least this one)... Right now I don't earn enough on TH-cam to test many UV lights/wands, but hopefully someday I will earn more and be able to do a larger scale test with multibrands.

    • @pandoravictoria9541
      @pandoravictoria9541 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@@FieldOfFocus❤

    • @pandoravictoria9541
      @pandoravictoria9541 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@@FieldOfFocusI completely understand. We are a one income house so I get it. I think your channel is 1 of a kind and I love it such a fantastic topic. Hopefully soon your channel will generate more income you deserve it and im shocked its not. I love binging on your videos.

    • @pandoravictoria9541
      @pandoravictoria9541 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@@FieldOfFocusthe toothbrush case I have is from Amazon and was not very expensive the brand is called, your mate and was around 10 or 14 bucks.

    • @pandoravictoria9541
      @pandoravictoria9541 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@@FieldOfFocus if you are looking for more suggestions I would love to see 70% isopropyl Alcohol I did watch your video on 91% however some say 91% drys to fast and is not best for killing bacteria so I would be very interested to see if there is any difference. My Dr told me to use lysol wipes when my little guy has strep instead of the Alcohol. I watch your video on seventh generation disinfect wipes loved the video btw so I got them but can't get past the smell and the 10 minute dwell time. I also got the seventh generation all purpose wipes for everyday cleaning when no one is sick since its not a disinfect and it smells amazing like tea with fresh lemon. I would love to see a video on the seventh generation all purpose wipes to see if they wipe away any bacteria you never know lol. Thank you for all you do and prayers your channel starts to generate the more income you deserve it xo

  • @OffRampTourist
    @OffRampTourist หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    In early 2020 I bought one of these wands to sanitize keys and buttons on PCs and printers I worked on, but I found the application wanting. Not enough time and too easy to expose eyes to the light accidentally.
    However, I soon after bought one of the box style units for my phone, keys, etc. and I still use it for 15 or 30 minutes on anything I accidentally drop on the floor (think remotes).
    I also bought one of the standing lamps and weekly move it from room to room/spot to spot and run it 30 or 45 or 60 minutes in each area, generally on trash day after everything has been gathered/bagged/removed.
    I also run it in front of the open AC unit while I'm outside cleaning the filter.

    • @FieldOfFocus
      @FieldOfFocus  หลายเดือนก่อน

      Right now I just tested this one type of wand. Hopefully someday I will earn more money on TH-cam to be able to purchase multiple types of devices and do a larger scale test.

  • @Christine112359
    @Christine112359 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

    Ain't no "magic" in that wand! 👎

    • @FieldOfFocus
      @FieldOfFocus  หลายเดือนก่อน

      RIGHT! This is not hospital or lab strength UV!

  • @lyn1.6
    @lyn1.6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Great video. I wonder if maybe the time wasn't enough. I know that it said 5 or 10 seconds and that you went up to 1 minute, but with some products like the Phone Soap, take around 10 minutes to work.

    • @FieldOfFocus
      @FieldOfFocus  หลายเดือนก่อน

      That is why I followed the directions during testing..If they tell people to use for 5 or 10 seconds, that is what they are going to use..

  • @georgiawild4332
    @georgiawild4332 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thank you for this. I was also wondering about this. I have a clamshell UV case for cell phones and the phone must remain for significantly longer, flipped and left again. I don't know if it really works, but after seeing this video, there may be "something" to it. I'm very disappointed in the results, but not surprised, lol.

    • @FieldOfFocus
      @FieldOfFocus  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I will add to my viewer suggestion list. Right now I am not making enough money on TH-cam to purchase multiple UV devices, but hopefully someday I will and I will be able to do a more extensive test!

    • @georgiawild4332
      @georgiawild4332 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@FieldOfFocus I just liked and subscribed. I thought I had before. I think you're doing a great service for us all! (Maybe not so much many of the hucksters trying to sell us stuff, lol)

  • @Ms.VitaMinC
    @Ms.VitaMinC หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Would love to see a small ultrasonic cleaner review from you thanks 😊

    • @FieldOfFocus
      @FieldOfFocus  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I will add that to my viewer suggestion list!

  • @smarttraveler8232
    @smarttraveler8232 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    UV light is used to remove bacteria in water in dialysis units. I would use it to remove bacteria in drinking water. Not sure if it would be more effective than Chlorine though.

    • @FieldOfFocus
      @FieldOfFocus  หลายเดือนก่อน

      I was only able to test 1 brand, 1 product. Hopefully someday I will earn more on TH-cam to be able to test more than one product.. it would be great to be able to test many types of UV sanitizers.

  • @alanrkanter
    @alanrkanter หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    A proper UVC lamp will do the job and quickly, but they are too dangerous for casual use. I've found via testing (lab grad spectrometer) that none of the LED type are as good as the claims. My lab utilizes high power gas discharge type UV lamps that can sterilize surfaces at great distances and generate ozone. The only downside is having to wait a few minutes for the ozone to return to safe levels. It breaks down from O3 to O2 quite quickly.

    • @FieldOfFocus
      @FieldOfFocus  หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you for taking the time to reply.. I just test products to see if their claims match real world applications. So in this case I tested the claims that the UV wand can remove bacteria. In no way am I advocating for the use of the product. There is no way that this wand is of the caliber of UV lights used in lab hoods.

  • @LLF1234
    @LLF1234 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Please do more tests with Hydrogen Peroxide, for people with asthma!!!
    I love your channel and I'm binge watching it, I love these tests and results! Thank you so so so much!!!

    • @FieldOfFocus
      @FieldOfFocus  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I do have quite a few videos on Hydrogen Peroxide, I will link them here:
      Bacteria Testing PureOxy Life Hydrogen Peroxide!!! th-cam.com/video/7Z9sF8nn-3Y/w-d-xo.html
      Testing Hydrogen Peroxide To See If It Can Remove Bacteria From Lettuce - VIEWER REQUEST! th-cam.com/video/tO07hB3zivc/w-d-xo.html
      Does Hydrogen Peroxide Disinfect My Toilet Bowl? VIEWER REQUEST! th-cam.com/video/3ytIEzWUpws/w-d-xo.html
      Re-Testing Lysol Hydrogen Peroxide Toilet Bowl Cleaner- Viewer Request! th-cam.com/video/cwno4ElNNF4/w-d-xo.html
      Hydrogen Peroxide as a Disinfectant: Did it kill bacteria in my home? Viewer Suggested Content! th-cam.com/video/UW7YFEJ_SsQ/w-d-xo.html

  • @Athenalovexoxo
    @Athenalovexoxo หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    So what if it was just this model? Do you try other brands or models? Loved this video tho it was helpful

    • @FieldOfFocus
      @FieldOfFocus  หลายเดือนก่อน

      That is true. I only can give results for the model that I tested. I don't make enough money on TH-cam to buy a large amount of them to test, but maybe someday I will be able to afford to do that!

  • @madiantin
    @madiantin หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Ehhhh. Thing is, even when it worked in your sinks it was the small localized area where the wand was held close to the sink. You'd have to do that in sections over the entire area - it would take *ages*. Very impractical. I agree, wipes and sprays work better and are more practical.

    • @FieldOfFocus
      @FieldOfFocus  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It would be impractical to hold the wand in place for extended periods of time, and I would never suggest that. It just seems worthless to me.

  • @positivelysimful1283
    @positivelysimful1283 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I wonder if the reason on the sinks the bacteria decreased because the first swabs wiped most of it away.

    • @FieldOfFocus
      @FieldOfFocus  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      If you watch my other videos you can see that the swabbing doesn't remove much bacteria.

  • @perduto85
    @perduto85 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thank you for this review, but how useful is the light in phones that are giving my daughter acne. And what about using it to clean makeup, brush, and tooth brush

    • @FieldOfFocus
      @FieldOfFocus  28 วันที่ผ่านมา

      I am not sure since I haven’t tested that yet!

  • @pandoravictoria9541
    @pandoravictoria9541 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I have a tooth brush case from Amazon for myself and my Son who gets strep often I honestly question if it works or not and I still soak them in antiseptic mouth wash to be safe but its a pain to do daily. I used to spray them with Alcohol but felt it was to toxic and questioned if U could rinse it about fully. I would love to see a test on toothbrush uv lights if you are still looking for suggestions.

    • @Leona147741
      @Leona147741 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Uv light will make any bacteria present unable to reproduce. Uv light does not kill the bacteria. You will still be protected.

    • @FieldOfFocus
      @FieldOfFocus  หลายเดือนก่อน

      That's a great idea! I will add that to my list of suggestions.

  • @leas128
    @leas128 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I wonder if a different type of bulb would make a difference? I have a non-LED UV light that was for aquariums that I put inside shoes to sterilize them. Now I’m wondering if mine works!

    • @FieldOfFocus
      @FieldOfFocus  หลายเดือนก่อน

      I can only speak for the wand that I tested. I do hope that someday I will earn more money on TH-cam to be able purchase a bunch of different UV lights to test!

  • @KaitlynMenser
    @KaitlynMenser 7 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Have you ever tested a steam cleaner??? Would love to see if they really work!

    • @FieldOfFocus
      @FieldOfFocus  8 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา

      Yes I have! Give the Bissell Power Steamer a Second Chance! Testing more areas!! More Bacteria Testing!
      th-cam.com/video/SWiHwjq5NPk/w-d-xo.html
      O-Cedar Spin Mop vs Shark Steam Mop: Remove Bacteria w/ Just Water? Bacteria Testing Complete!
      th-cam.com/video/cOJLvxwEy-E/w-d-xo.html

  • @mvneighbor4380
    @mvneighbor4380 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    It appears you had a cover over the dishes where you transferred bacteria. I'm sure that kept material from falling into the dishes. However is it possible that the lid doesn't transmit the UV light completely?

    • @FieldOfFocus
      @FieldOfFocus  หลายเดือนก่อน

      I did test without the lid and sorry I forgot to show results in the video.. The results were virtually identical.

  • @bygodsgracejourneytohealin8368
    @bygodsgracejourneytohealin8368 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Vinegar works 100%

    • @FieldOfFocus
      @FieldOfFocus  28 วันที่ผ่านมา

      I have tested vinegar in these videos
      Testing Vinegar! What Removes Bacteria Better:Full Strength, 50/50 Dish Soap or 50/50 Water?? #clean
      th-cam.com/video/9CKWda1vW5Q/w-d-xo.html
      Does Vinegar Remove Bacteria in Laundry? Bacteria Tested!
      th-cam.com/video/v4ey1A5a-WA/w-d-xo.html
      Bacteria Testing Lettuce Mix Before & After Washing w/ Sal Suds, Vinegar, Baking Soda & Water.
      th-cam.com/video/Q-v7GdqY4U0/w-d-xo.html
      Does VINEGAR Clean & Disinfect Bacteria? CLEAN WITH ME & FIND OUT!
      th-cam.com/video/9BLSb9AaB_o/w-d-xo.html

  • @amechealle5918
    @amechealle5918 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    What about the UV light on black mold?

    • @FieldOfFocus
      @FieldOfFocus  หลายเดือนก่อน

      I cannot say because I didn't test that!

  • @GabrielKnightz
    @GabrielKnightz หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    That's disappointing, i figured it would have a better effect. Would've been useful around household medical equipment and produce. Thanks for testing it. Does it say what wavelength it is? should say something nm.

    • @FieldOfFocus
      @FieldOfFocus  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The packaging did not say the wavelength. I will test more UV products over time! Thanks!

  • @maryg.7790
    @maryg.7790 16 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Have you done video checking packages for germs, etc. We all know amazon, etc. can be dirty but what about the world of microbes????

    • @FieldOfFocus
      @FieldOfFocus  14 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      I haven't, but will add that to my viewer suggestion list!!! That sounds fun!

  • @chawin007
    @chawin007 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    For my Philips UV lamp, it has a 15-minute exposure mode and 30, 45 minutes for larger rooms.
    I think that exposure for a few seconds is not helpful and the power of the portable lamp is too low. Finally, the UV light cannot penetrate even a little bit such as glass or plastic.

    • @FieldOfFocus
      @FieldOfFocus  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Different machines will have different directions. I followed the directions for this wand. Hopefully as my channel grows and I earn more money I will be able to purchase a variety of UV products and do a larger scale test!

  • @oliviagonzalez4584
    @oliviagonzalez4584 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Could it possibly work if the petri would not have the lid?

    • @FieldOfFocus
      @FieldOfFocus  หลายเดือนก่อน

      I did test that and it yielded the same results.. thanks for asking, sorry I forgot to mention that in the video.

  • @Vic-dl7wq
    @Vic-dl7wq หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Can you test Crown Kleen wipes for hats?

    • @FieldOfFocus
      @FieldOfFocus  หลายเดือนก่อน

      I will add that to my viewer suggestion list!

  • @carolstella6776
    @carolstella6776 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    In a way I’m very surprised, since we know sunlight is very good for killing bacteria on laundry. Guess you just need the real deal! 😉

    • @irritatedkitty7301
      @irritatedkitty7301 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      +

    • @FieldOfFocus
      @FieldOfFocus  หลายเดือนก่อน

      This wand just isn't it!! Others may be better, I just was able to test this one!

  • @rychei5393
    @rychei5393 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Force of Nature on lettuce.

    • @FieldOfFocus
      @FieldOfFocus  หลายเดือนก่อน

      Will add to my viewer suggestion list!

  • @Ranger-8013
    @Ranger-8013 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Could visible light be interfering with the UV light? Maybe using it in a dark room would be helpful?

    • @shoe_thompsano
      @shoe_thompsano หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Heya! From what I understand visible and UV light are in different parts of the spectrum , so they don’t interfere with each other. They have different energy levels and wavelengths, so no overlap occurs.
      If you're making very precise measurements (like a physics level experiment), visible light might affect the results because it bounces back and acts as noise. In those cases, controlling light in your environment is important. But on a molecular level, there shouldn't be any significant interference.

    • @feraacedia1825
      @feraacedia1825 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      This product does not produce UV-C which is what is necessary to sterilize. Amazon has poor regulation on their products.

    • @FieldOfFocus
      @FieldOfFocus  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @feraacedia1825 EXACTLY!

    • @FieldOfFocus
      @FieldOfFocus  หลายเดือนก่อน

      I don't think so. I think the UV in this wand is just not strong enough.

  • @tmontero8492
    @tmontero8492 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Could the light's ineffective results on the Petrie dish samples and toilet rim have something to do with the type of bacteria? Just guessing here -- thank you!

    • @limitlessends
      @limitlessends หลายเดือนก่อน

      It almost seemed like it was most effective on hard surfaces. But you’re right the toilet rim didn’t change much and that would be a hard surface as well.

    • @feraacedia1825
      @feraacedia1825 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Unfortunately, based on the color of the light produced, it is not producing UV-C which is a light blue color.
      That being said, using UV-C lamps, you need proper skin and eye protection as it is dangerous

    • @shoe_thompsano
      @shoe_thompsano หลายเดือนก่อน

      Or maybe it's just the overall amount? Maybe there's just a crap ton (pun intended) more bacteria on a toilet compared to a sink?
      After all I've heard that anywhere from 25%-50% of stool is actually bacterial mass.

    • @FieldOfFocus
      @FieldOfFocus  หลายเดือนก่อน

      Always a possibility!

  • @Cswazey348
    @Cswazey348 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Toothbrush sanitizer

    • @FieldOfFocus
      @FieldOfFocus  หลายเดือนก่อน

      Will add to my viewer suggestion list!

  • @LLF1234
    @LLF1234 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    First like, first comment!

    • @FieldOfFocus
      @FieldOfFocus  หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks for being the first commenter!

  • @andreagardner2335
    @andreagardner2335 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I would never trust these devices. If you are worried, wipe the surface down with the appropriate cleaning agent.

  • @mylair7204
    @mylair7204 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Uvc doesn't make bacteria disappear, what were you trying to achieve? I thought you were going to check if they were still viable or made inert after uvc. You just checked if they disappeared. is this a joke?

    • @mylair7204
      @mylair7204 หลายเดือนก่อน

      For the record, yes, uc-c works quit well as ling as you're using correct n number like 850 nm vs 750 nm. UVC (100-280 nm). Short-wavelength UVC is the most damaging type of UV

    • @FieldOfFocus
      @FieldOfFocus  หลายเดือนก่อน

      I was testing it because it is marketed as being able to remove bacteria. The product claim is that is removes bacteria. I tested the product claim. Not a joke. Just testing the claim.

  • @lindastevens6861
    @lindastevens6861 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I’m sorry I rather spray bleach and wipe clean😊

    • @FieldOfFocus
      @FieldOfFocus  หลายเดือนก่อน

      That is always an option! I test all sorts of cleaning products!

  • @ICHope1
    @ICHope1 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I used a UV wand during COVID on mail and packages. Also during COVID hospitals and airlines used huge UV lamps that are turned on and no one in the area as it sanitizes the area.
    Maybe the time nada to be greater or maybe some UV lamps are more in tense, but I think of it like a portable sun. You’ve already tested laundry hung out to dry in the sun and know that the sun sanitizes. Of course laundry hangs in the sun much longer than 10 seconds.

    • @feraacedia1825
      @feraacedia1825 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Unfortunately, the wand in the video is fake and does not produce UV-C which is the sterilizing light

    • @bettyir4302
      @bettyir4302 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Ugh, I bought two lights during c19 and they turned out to be 4" long for the entire thing so the actual light is teeny. Ridiculous waste of money so they're in the back of the junk drawer taking up room.

    • @Leona147741
      @Leona147741 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@ICHope1 the uv lights inhibited the ability of the organisms to reproduce.

    • @FieldOfFocus
      @FieldOfFocus  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      For me, this UV lamp isn't worth it, but there may be other brands that work better. In labs we have UV lights in the hoods, so I know that UV works, but do these at home wands work as well as hospital grade, no.

    • @FieldOfFocus
      @FieldOfFocus  หลายเดือนก่อน

      @feraacedia1825 Exactly!

  • @DaemonCross
    @DaemonCross หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Next Test: SUN LIGHT vs Bacteria!

    • @FieldOfFocus
      @FieldOfFocus  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I have done that twice! I will link videos for you
      Washing & Drying in the SUN to Remove Bacteria? -VIEWER REQUEST- Tested w/Petri dishes! th-cam.com/video/MioFTSuBQHA/w-d-xo.html
      Does the Sun Remove Bacteria From Cloths? - Part 2! Viewer Request th-cam.com/video/1vCqi2ofYiU/w-d-xo.html

  • @ItsAllFakeAndGhey
    @ItsAllFakeAndGhey 18 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    What a silly product! Much easier to just spray a surface

    • @FieldOfFocus
      @FieldOfFocus  14 วันที่ผ่านมา

      I agree... but it was a viewer suggestion!