Botched refueling ends up in disaster at Las Cruces Airport, New Mexico - Golden Eagle N51RX

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 9 ก.พ. 2025
  • An Air Ambulance Cessna 421C with a medical crew and one patient, destined for Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport, couldn't make the journey because of a very inconceivable mistake. Don't forget to sub and like for more videos!

ความคิดเห็น • 455

  • @CAROLUSPRIMA
    @CAROLUSPRIMA 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +33

    This is becoming my favorite aviation incident channel. This guy could have uploaded one of the dozens of incidents that every single channel covers and probably gotten more views. In the short term.
    In the long term he will do as well as any of them because of covering crashes such as this one.
    Spare me another deep dive into Tenerife, AA 191 or JAL 123. I’ve seen enough. Show me something new. Like this one.

    • @tungstenkid2271
      @tungstenkid2271 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Agreed,, I like these short sharp vids which tell us in the title or early on what caused the crash, I rarely watch any long rambling vids where we have to skip to the end to find out what the cause of the crash was.

    • @gregfolland6569
      @gregfolland6569 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Totally agree with you ✅ - this has become my favourite aviation channel, for the same reason.

  • @charlesschneiter
    @charlesschneiter 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +124

    This video struck awfully close to home with me! As a young copilot for the Swiss Regional airline Crossair we used 412C's on some of our thinner routes. On one very hot day in July, we had to fuel up in Milan Malpensa before flying to Lugano Switzerland, which was just a short hop of 20 minutes. While the captain was in the FBO, I was preparing the cockpit and studying the passenger manifest, when I watched the fuel truck pull up to our Golden Eagle. Since I was studiying the all the papers and manifests, I looked outside the window and it took a few seconds until the glaring sign on the fueling truck's side registered in my brain: It read Jet A-1!!! Well, I must have broken the world speed record for the time it takes to leave the cockpit, running back along the cabin and jumping out of the aircraft to yell at the fueler to immediately stop the process. Alas there must have been already a good 100 liters of Jet A-1 in the one tank by then. After I finished yelling at the fueler I asked him how in heck he started filling this airplane wit A-1?? His answer, hold your breath, was: "but it says turbo power on the side of the engine nacelle!".. I was speechless. We then proceeded to empty this tank and thoroughly flush it of any residue of Jet A-1. Hadn't I seen this I wouldn't be relating this story today... But there for the grace of God went I plus the captain plus the passengers.. This still sends a shiver down my spine... Half a year later we transferred to turbine airplanes, namely the famous Metro III and later the SAAB SF-340.

    • @stevehuffman1495
      @stevehuffman1495 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Why is the nose so long on this model?

    • @charlesschneiter
      @charlesschneiter 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      @@stevehuffman1495 There are some Systems, the nosewheel well, the heat exchanger, plus a quite useful baggage compartment. It still is one very fine airplane! HTH Charles

    • @billwendell6886
      @billwendell6886 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Not a pilot, but old mechanic, a half gallon of kero in the gas would clean all the carbon off the valves and piston crown. In your car. What do A&P mechs do? Think Walter Matthau.

    • @dennistucker9081
      @dennistucker9081 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Sir, I am not a pilot, but I have watched many videos of plane crashes. So that makes me 😅 *informed* idiot, I have watched enough videos to know the three key words: aviate, navigate, communicate. One airflight video channel owner(1) has advised that if the pilot had simply flown the plane straight ahead it would not have stalled and crashed. He has also mentioned numerous times about how difficult turning back to the airport can be. I don’t know what to say about the right engine, but do you think that if he had simply prepared to land on that flat area it would’ve worked out? Thanks for the video.
      (1) Dan Gryder, experienced pilot and owner of *Probable Cause,* on TH-cam

    • @davidsmiths5471
      @davidsmiths5471 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@charlesschneiter So your in the cockpit doing a check list? Before the aircraft is fueled

  • @cablerbergschneider8541
    @cablerbergschneider8541 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +91

    Fly the aircraft.all the way into the crash landing, per Bob Hoover. Loss of thrust does not equate to a stall. That is pilot error. He was surrounded by flat desert. Plenty of space to land, nose down, straight ahead, per Dan Grider, "Probable Cause." So sad, a mid-time pilot with no understanding of physics.

    • @y00t00b3r
      @y00t00b3r 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      Thank you. I was just about to point out that this stall was entirely voluntary. Perhaps their patient was in critical condition? Well guess what? Now they're all dead.

    • @AlbertHess-xy7ky
      @AlbertHess-xy7ky 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Dan Gryder is a law suit loser. And obnoxious.

    • @bobanpen1
      @bobanpen1 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      The stall happened because the pilot was pulling back on the yoke to cover more ground.

    • @billcallahan9303
      @billcallahan9303 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Good call. Also, a 421 had GITSO 520Ms.

    • @46bovine
      @46bovine 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      The graphic showed a C-402. Not a big deal, the C-421 has rounded windows as it’s pressured and the engines have a bulge in the front as there is a reduction gear up there. Just for information.

  • @ggeorge4144
    @ggeorge4144 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    Absolutely no reason to stall the aircraft. It's called down elevator. As a flight instructor I had a private pilot I was checking out stall an aircraft on a go around by only using half throttle. I sat up so fast and jammed the throttle in and pushed the carb heat off at the same time with my pinky. I then pushed the nose to the ground and leveled off at 2-3 feet above the ground, built up speed and climbed out. Never waste time on the radio until the situation is totally under control. There is not a damn thing the controllers can do to help you, the load is on you. Professional pilots should spend at least an hour a day reading the NTSB reporter and become familiar with all the things that can go wrong. I did that everyday for 2 hours. I would read a story of a crash, then sit there with my eyes closed imagining what I would do in the same circumstance. It paid off in spades as I found myself in a similar situation and got myself out of it.

  • @laethharper
    @laethharper 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +45

    I'm a pilot and losing an engine or engines does NOT mean you will end up in a stall !!

    • @arnenelson4495
      @arnenelson4495 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Exactly!

    • @bkailua1224
      @bkailua1224 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I agree

    • @wilburfinnigan2142
      @wilburfinnigan2142 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      laethharper That pilot F'd up in more than one way.....He did not moniter the fueling, and just because the engines quit does not mean you have to crash, planes will glide and are still controllable !!! Geeeeeese !!! and gas engines will not self destruct on jet fuel/stove oil/ diesel, they will run, have run gas engines on diesel/stove oil many many times !!!!

    • @bills6093
      @bills6093 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@wilburfinnigan2142 The engines are fuel injected. They really will not like kerosene at all.

    • @billmorris2613
      @billmorris2613 หลายเดือนก่อน

      A recep gas engine will not run very long on Jet A or any other type of kerosene based fuel. It simply does not have the octane needed to sustain the operation of a gas engine. Jet A, A1, JP5,JP8 are kerosene based and only have an octane rating of 15. Jet B and JP4 are naphtha based and have an octane rating around 60. Both fall short of the low lead 100 octane used in gas powered aircraft engines.

  • @jhawker2895
    @jhawker2895 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +67

    "The low altitude and slow speed of the aircraft prevented the pilot from maneuvering to prevent it from entering the imminent stall" ... This is total B.S. ... A stall is 99% sudden death at low altitude... Any pilot with a lick of common sense would prevent a stall at low altitude at all cost. Even a rough crash landing at least has a chance of survival. Allowing the plane to stall at low altitude is just plain stupid... low altitude did NOT prevent the pilot from maneuvering ... Whoever wrote this text is or should not be piloting a plane anytime soon ....

    • @46bovine
      @46bovine 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      You are correct!

    • @Hawker900XP
      @Hawker900XP 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      And level the wings

    • @tungstenkid2271
      @tungstenkid2271 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Yes, any kid on a computer flight sim knows that if there's a sudden loss of power you should push the nose down to maintain airspeed and glide straight ahead into the nearest open space.
      It's because using the ailerons in a turn messes up the airflow over the inside wing which is always the one that stalls.

    • @mikeprevost8650
      @mikeprevost8650 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      That terrain looked pretty good for an emergency landing.

    • @danburch9989
      @danburch9989 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@tungstenkid2271 In airplane wing design, the wing root (nearest the fuselage) always stalls first then progresses to the wing tip as the angle of attack increases. It's called washout. That still allows roll control with the ailerons up until the whole wing stalls. Then it's all over.

  • @richardheeth6218
    @richardheeth6218 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

    This strikes close to home for me. I used to be a flight medic. That reg number looks very familiar. I may have either been on that A/C or met it before. Our program sustained a loss of a BK-117. Pilot switched to a dry tank. Auto-rotated into the ground. No loss of life, but pilot was in rehabilitation for months afterwards finally gaining the ability to walk again. One reason I left that field was there are way too many programs willing to fly in weather that is below minimums. Hospitals don't help. They do what we called "helicopter shopping". Weather bad?? Keep calling until one accepts. Pilots may sometimes be forced (either by the program or self-forced) into accepting a mission in bad weather due to patient aquity. The pilot should think only of crew safety, not completing the mission at any cost. Any crew member in a properly run program should have the ability to say NO to the mission. You have to think of weather where you are at, where you are picking up, at you destination and everywhere in-between. There have been missions where we were picking up and weather closed in. Sometimes we would call the local EMS to transport us to our destination and the pilot would wait out the weather. It sucks to go into I-IFR. Easy to lose situational awareness and make a CFIT, strike a tower or power cable. I've lost too many of my EMS family. We have to remember that we did not make the patient sick and crashing does not make them better. Old saying "There are old pilots, there are bold pilots. But there are no old bold pilots." There is no room for cowboys here. My 2¢.

    • @CFITOMAHAWK
      @CFITOMAHAWK 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      There are many old bold pilots. Military, crop dusters, Bush pilots. But There are no Stupid old bold pilots..

    • @davegubbins4428
      @davegubbins4428 23 วันที่ผ่านมา

      thanks for that revealing (to me at least) insight.

  • @blake86303
    @blake86303 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

    The fueler should have been charged with involuntary manslaughter, 3 counts.

    • @davidsmiths5471
      @davidsmiths5471 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Why?

    • @arnenelson4495
      @arnenelson4495 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@@davidsmiths5471 He is trained to NOT make this mistake. I fueled aircraft for 5 years and had a close one but caught it in time. The aircraft fuel tank was not properly labeled.

    • @davidsmiths5471
      @davidsmiths5471 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@arnenelson4495 Everyone makes mistakes! You almost did and you are blaming the labeling! The FBO and pilot dropped the ball on this tragic day!

    • @michaelmoon8856
      @michaelmoon8856 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@davidsmiths5471
      Because u can LOOK at the plane and kno it is NOT a jet nor a turbo prop , DOES NOT take jet fuel.
      Anyone that clueless shud not be allowed to work in aviation.

    • @davidsmiths5471
      @davidsmiths5471 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@michaelmoon8856 I hope your not on any flight line with that type of thought process! See a person that uses common sense in their everyday life! Would know ANY DOUBTS about which fuel goes into anybodies aircraft! Would ask the person or wait till they were present!

  • @williampeel3688
    @williampeel3688 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    The same thing happened back in'91 where a CV-240D was fueled with Jet-A instead of 100LL. It was fueled by my old Supervisor of a FBO at CAK. It made it a about a 1/4 mile off of the end of RWY 19 before impact, no fatalities. I was able to walk up to the wreckage still smoldering. Company went out of business.

    • @AlbertHess-xy7ky
      @AlbertHess-xy7ky 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Did the pilot confirm that the aircraft was properly fueled?

    • @williampeel3688
      @williampeel3688 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@AlbertHess-xy7ky He signed off on the ticket but the lawsuit killed the company.

    • @AlbertHess-xy7ky
      @AlbertHess-xy7ky 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@williampeel3688 The pilot signed off that he got the correct fuel?

    • @williampeel3688
      @williampeel3688 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@AlbertHess-xy7ky Yep, the receptionist gave him the ticket. He signed and paid for the fuel. Should have paid attention as at the time there was big price difference between 100LL and Jet-A.

    • @AlbertHess-xy7ky
      @AlbertHess-xy7ky 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@williampeel3688 He paid with his life.

  • @yhird
    @yhird 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    “Aviation in itself is not inherently dangerous. But to an even greater degree than the sea, it is terribly unforgiving of any carelessness, incapacity or neglect” - Captain Alfred G. Lamplugh

  • @James-FL
    @James-FL 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I lived in Las Cruces at the time. Negligence and incompetence seem rampant in the work force there. Sad that people died 😢

  • @paulkelly4731
    @paulkelly4731 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

    40 gallons is not enough for 3 hours of flight, must have had another 40 gallons already onboard

    • @flyguy5941
      @flyguy5941 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That was what I thought too!

    • @davidmotter5140
      @davidmotter5140 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Maybe 40 per side

  • @michaelbedinger4121
    @michaelbedinger4121 4 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Very unfortunate. May the victims rest in peace 🙏 Thank you very much for sharing this MPC 😊

  • @richardheeth6218
    @richardheeth6218 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    My heart especially goes out to the family of the patient that perished in this incident. May you eventually find peace of mind. It may take a while, but you will find it if you seek it.❤

  • @dexterpoindexter3583
    @dexterpoindexter3583 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Change nozzles and receptacles so only the correct nozzle can be inserted. As we do with plugs and sockets for electric power, audio, video, computers etc. And with screws/ bolts and screwdrivers.
    Or get very technical: study preschoolers trying to put square pegs in round holes. That should waste enough time and money to satisfy the bureaucrats that it's a solid solution.

    • @rogermac358
      @rogermac358 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The FAA required avgas fueled aircraft to have fuel tank restrictors installed and jet fuel nozzles to be oversized so as to not fit in an avgas tank all the way back in the late 1980's. Someone had to have non compliant equipment or made a great deal of effort to get jet-a into a piston airplane. I was a line service supervisor when the regulations changed, and the jet-a nozzles would barely fit some turbine aircraft, let alone trying to get it past the restrictors on piston aircraft.
      I'd really like to hear the rest of the story on this incident!

    • @dexterpoindexter3583
      @dexterpoindexter3583 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @rogermac358 Good to know; thanks! Sounds just like the switch from leaded to non-leaded gasoline decades ago, where non-leaded pump nozzles & vehicle tank inlets were made smaller so a leaded gas nozzle wouldn't fit into a non-leaded car/ bus/ truck -- 's tank.
      You could still pump non-leaded gas into an older made-for-leaded tank, though. The knocking might drive you to distraction and cause some engine damage eventually... but nothing as serious as this disaster.

  • @davidcarter2379
    @davidcarter2379 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    The aircraft depicted in this video is a Cessna 402C powered by Continental TSIO 520 VB engines. When an aircraft stalls it referring to the wing not the engine.

    • @WaltIvey
      @WaltIvey หลายเดือนก่อน

      Close but actually GTISO 520L Continentals

  • @rocketman4438
    @rocketman4438 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    I worked the flight line at a small FBO back in the 70s, we had everything from C150s, Piper Navajos, up to MU2s, Sabreliners, King Airs, etc.
    My team and I were always cognizant of never making this mistake.
    It's unforgivable.

    • @AlbertHess-xy7ky
      @AlbertHess-xy7ky 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Who is responsible for order the correct fuel type?

    • @rocketman4438
      @rocketman4438 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@AlbertHess-xy7ky
      The pilot flying the airplane is responsible, but we were pretty airplane knowledgeable and we could discern between a piston engine and a turbine engine.

    • @tomfilipiak3511
      @tomfilipiak3511 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      The trick and I worked the line at Midway airport in Chicago for 46 years,retired in 2016, turn the prop,if there is resistance your a recip engine,if the prop moves freely,it’s a turbine!

    • @AlbertHess-xy7ky
      @AlbertHess-xy7ky 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@rocketman4438 Your pimply faced new hires?

    • @AlbertHess-xy7ky
      @AlbertHess-xy7ky 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Keep your hands off the propellor.

  • @mendel5106
    @mendel5106 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Very realistic visuals. Thanks

    • @davidsmiths5471
      @davidsmiths5471 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@mendel5106 except for the refueling truck! Would have been in front or back of the aircraft to be refueled

    • @mendel5106
      @mendel5106 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@davidsmiths5471 I was talking in general compared to other channels. Take a deep breath 🫁

  • @asteverino8569
    @asteverino8569 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    The closest thing similar in my life was when a gas station attendant filled my 70 something Oldsmobile diesel with gasoline. I caught the mistake barely as I saw the attendant hang up the nozzle. They drained the tank and schooled the attendant. The gas filler tube says "diesel fuel only" and I was in the "diesel only" lane. Diesel Olds sedans were new and not usual.

  • @kcstafford2784
    @kcstafford2784 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    i like the reading better than AI voice and background music ill be back...

  • @rockmathias1848
    @rockmathias1848 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    In the US, things may be different now: the Jet Fuel nozzle is like a duck bill; it can NOT fit into a AvGas filler neck. The Jet Fuel nozzle is too big.

    • @williampeel3688
      @williampeel3688 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It depends on the age of the aircraft as Corvair had huge fueling necks. Some were converted to turbo props but you just can't miss a huge radial engine and cowl with oil leaks. I was an Avionics Tech for Prowlers in the '80s and our first deployment we had both piston and jets. Second deployment and the piston CODs were gone.
      Nothing like having avg gas next to 2 million gallons of JP-4

    • @j.d.farmer6164
      @j.d.farmer6164 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      This program started in the late 1980s. Manufacturers sent out restrictors to install in the fuel filler necks of older aircraft so that the filling nozzles for jet fuel could not fit smaller fuel inlets. I would like to know more details about how this aircraft got the wrong fuel.

  • @nedsackmann2215
    @nedsackmann2215 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    Was the fuel/gas cap placard in english?what kind of knuckleheads are they hiring to fuel planes,jets,helicopters out in New Mexico?

    • @davidsmiths5471
      @davidsmiths5471 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Don't know how you can even put a jetA nozzle into that type of aircraft!

    • @bills6093
      @bills6093 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@davidsmiths5471 NTSB report says that the Jet-A truck had a small nozzle.

    • @davidsmiths5471
      @davidsmiths5471 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @bills6093 Which is very weird,

    • @davidsmiths5471
      @davidsmiths5471 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@bills6093 So again FBO Problem

    • @bills6093
      @bills6093 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@davidsmiths5471 Well, the pilot signed a receipt for 40 gallons of Jet A...

  • @Mark-pp7jy
    @Mark-pp7jy 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

    The fueler claimed that fuel type was not specified??? Geezuschryst, what the phuck are the hiring standards at this FBO?

    • @Ackermanmedia
      @Ackermanmedia 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      DEI baby DEI....get ready for more. The Jet A nozzle doesn't fit into the Avgas fuel filler receiver. In order to get that fuel in that plane he, or she would have had to go slow holding the filler nozzle out almost pouring it and aiming. Seriously dumb...I worked line in high school then in Santa monica...this happened to a plane at Supermarine Aviation there filled by one of the old timer fuel guys. Crazy.

    • @AlbertHess-xy7ky
      @AlbertHess-xy7ky 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      $15 and hour refuelers are supposed to know what kind of fuel each aircraft should take?
      Including conversions?
      It is the pilot's responsibility to specify the fuel type and quantify, and make very sure that he got what he ordered, and that the fuel caps are in place.
      Geezuschryst, Mark is a phucking fool. Not a (good?) pilot.
      Reply

    • @AlbertHess-xy7ky
      @AlbertHess-xy7ky 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Ackermanmedia Was this refueler a DEI hire?

    • @AlbertHess-xy7ky
      @AlbertHess-xy7ky 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Geezuschryst, what the phuck are the hiring standards at this charter company that allows their aircraft to be refueled without pilot supervision.

    • @AlbertHess-xy7ky
      @AlbertHess-xy7ky 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Was the pilot a DEI hire, he failed to supervise the fueling of his plane, Is he now a dead DEI hire?

  • @TheAirportSteven
    @TheAirportSteven หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I was working for this Air Ambulance Company at the time & knew everyone onboard. 😭

  • @Qmcr9Vjm62
    @Qmcr9Vjm62 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    There is nothing in the accident report that indicates a stall/spin.
    The aircraft was in a generally eastbound direction and level when it hit the ground. Consistent with a takeoff from RWY 26.
    It turned over and caught fire when impacting the ground.
    It sounds more like an emergency landing and then they hit something that inverted and smashed up the aircraft with a rapid post crash fire when fuel hit the overhead engines.
    The only pilot mistake I cans see is failing to check what fuel you got.
    The FBO had not fitted the recommended larger nozzle and it sounds in the report like the fuel guy had inadequate training for the job and was the only one on duty.

    • @dalegreer3095
      @dalegreer3095 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Runway 26 is westbound. Two witnesses saw the plane entering a left turn. A medical crewmember onboard the airplane called the company medical dispatcher and reported that the flight was returning to LRU.
      However there's no mention of a stall, and the report says the plane impacted upright then flipped.

    • @Qmcr9Vjm62
      @Qmcr9Vjm62 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @ You are correct, my bad. Thanks for correcting that.

  • @jamess5154
    @jamess5154 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Many many years ago I was a line boy. We never put fuel in anything without written orders or the pilot standing there.

    • @AlbertHess-xy7ky
      @AlbertHess-xy7ky 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      As it should be.

    • @davidsmiths5471
      @davidsmiths5471 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Really ,find that hard to believe!

    • @jamess5154
      @jamess5154 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@davidsmiths5471 If the pilot was not there they had to place the order through he front desk who filled out an order sheet which was passed to us. Probably not so much to make sure the right fuel but to make sure the front desk got paid.
      We did have an incident with a corporate jet that did not get the prist order right and that caused some problems so they were real careful about fuel orders..

    • @davidsmiths5471
      @davidsmiths5471 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@jamess5154 This happened by poor training and management of the FBO!

    • @davidsmiths5471
      @davidsmiths5471 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@jamess5154 So as an expert FBO person, why didnt anybody question why prist was not order? Any your also saying you or anybody has never refueled an aircraft with out someone watching!

  • @MeaHeaR
    @MeaHeaR 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Oh this is So Sad
    R.I.P. to All the Poor Souls on Board 🌹

  • @AlanToon-fy4hg
    @AlanToon-fy4hg 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    That was not supposed to happen, due to changes made after the 1970 Air Acres Martin 404 crash in Atlanta.
    Warning labels were made mandatory, and jet fuel nozzles are designed not to fit in Avgas receptacles.
    But it still happens.

    • @davidsmiths5471
      @davidsmiths5471 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      So then you would think it's the company doing the refueling and training

  • @Stevesaenznm
    @Stevesaenznm 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    When I was in flight training back in the ‘90s at Las cruces with VY flying club we had a student pilot miscalculate his fuel consumption coming back from Arizona . We found him bout 15 miles west of LRU , he managed to find a dirt road to set down on but hit a berm & flipped the plane on its back . Student was humiliated but fine. Flying was simpler & way less expensive back then .

  • @lynndale6235
    @lynndale6235 หลายเดือนก่อน

    A couple of things for the creator of the video, the depicted aircraft is not a C421C which is pressurized. Square windows/Round windows and the cowling is wrong. It looks more like a C414. Next, the depiction of the right engine shut down shows the props in flat pitch instead of feathered. I don't know if this was really the case or an oversight but it does make a huge difference in drag and as others have said, Low and Slow is a bad combination. I began my aviation career as a lineman and most times there is little training, mostly OJT. Pilots: You need to know that last week your lineman could have been working at Burger King.

  • @tungstenkid2271
    @tungstenkid2271 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I heard there's a saying among military jet pilots as they walk out to their planes for takeoff-- "Today is the day I'll have to eject" which gets them into the right mindset of not leaving it too late to punch out.
    Likewise prop-plane pilots could adopt the same mindset (especially twin-engine pilots) by thinking as they walk out to their planes- "Today is the day my engine will quit on me" to mentally prepare themselves.

  • @mikeprevost8650
    @mikeprevost8650 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    It wasn't a very inconceivable mistake. I didn't even have to hit play to guess that they got a load of Jet A in the tanks. "Botched refueling" was all I needed to see.
    Back in the days before self-service took over service stations, a guy drove into my uncle's Texaco station with a car that sounded like Tito Puente was banging the timbales under the hood. He refueled at a station up the road, and the attendant evidently mistook the kerosene pump for the regular one.

  • @JWP452
    @JWP452 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    That was really sad and horrible! RIP everyone.

  • @billmorris2613
    @billmorris2613 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The pilot should have never let the aircraft stall. Put it down off the airport if necessary. It was in the desert as depicted on Google Earth with some sagebrush. A gear up in the sand, with a proper touchdown and no other obstacles except the sage brush, every one should have survived the belly landing.
    With 1553 hours of multi engine time the pilot should of had plenty experience to not stall the aircraft. I wonder what were the issues that caused him to not “Fly the airplane, first?”

  • @flyingardilla143
    @flyingardilla143 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I learned to fly at Las Cruces. On the hot days you had to think light thoughts to get the C-152 off the ground (it seemed).

  • @jdsaldivar5606
    @jdsaldivar5606 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Eighty Deuce
    Nice work on the video...

  • @KennyNash-sb9sh
    @KennyNash-sb9sh 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Absolutely heart breaking!

  • @Pixx4you
    @Pixx4you 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Terrific animation..!

  • @richardheeth6218
    @richardheeth6218 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    May the families of the crew have at least some solice that they perished helping others❤❤❤

  • @JohnShields-xx1yk
    @JohnShields-xx1yk หลายเดือนก่อน

    What I can't understand is how there aren't accidents everyday, between human errors and the rapid communication between pilots and controllers, different accents, the critical info is communicated so quickly, idk.

  • @rescue270
    @rescue270 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

    The airplane looks like a 402C, not a 421C.
    Same thing happened to another 421C aerial ambulance at San Antonio around 1993. Same thing, the wreckage reeked of jet fuel. Pilot was kilked on impact. Co pot died a few hours later. The flight nurse survived for a month or so but finally died of complications from his injuries.

  • @scoot77777
    @scoot77777 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Wow! Still hard to understand how this can happen! Godspeed to those who perished 🙏

  • @seaswirl79
    @seaswirl79 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This identical situation happened here in Spokane with a craft from Canada being refueled at SFF. Instead of 100 LL avgas, the FBO goofball put jet fuel in. The craft departed SFF on 22R, losing power shortly after and crashing and killing the sole occupant and pilot. The craft, a Piper PA46-350 was destroyed on Feb 22, 2015

    • @AlbertHess-xy7ky
      @AlbertHess-xy7ky 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The goofball pilot is responsible for what is aboard their aircraft.

    • @davidsmiths5471
      @davidsmiths5471 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Who trained the goofball?

  • @benklotz6881
    @benklotz6881 29 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I think the confusion with which fuel to use has always been towards the small twin engines airplanes. Twin Cessnas, twin pipers and twin Beechcraft. I don’t think the line guy knew well enough but as a piston engine pilot, you would know to sump the fuels before each flight.

  • @tombeck2792
    @tombeck2792 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    great animation, the re-feuler should have seen props on the engine as he pulled next to it.

    • @davidsmiths5471
      @davidsmiths5471 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Really

    • @davidsmiths5471
      @davidsmiths5471 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What's really neat ! You are clueless! If a DC-3 or B-29 lands at a FBO explain how you refuel them??

    • @tombeck2792
      @tombeck2792 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@davidsmiths5471 Why am I clueless, the NTSB concluded the wrong fuel was installed, and cap was labelled for avgas.

    • @davidsmiths5471
      @davidsmiths5471 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@tombeck2792 I understand all that! You stated the props? Now answer my Dc-3 B-29 question!

    • @AlbertHess-xy7ky
      @AlbertHess-xy7ky 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Psssst, your ignorance is showing. Piper's newest trainer uses jet fuel. Not to mention thousands of of turboprops. You would refuel based on props? You are a fool.

  • @demiurgiac
    @demiurgiac 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    1. Any fuel truck driver worthy of the title needs little more than a glance at the engine nacelles to know its NOT a jet.
    2. The last statement (The low altitude and slow speed...) was written by someone who knows nothing about flying airplanes... get the nose down (keep it above VS) keep the wings level as possible, fly it to the crash site. Simple.

  • @garymurphy6980
    @garymurphy6980 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Same thing happened to Bob Hoover and his Shrike Commander.

    • @jamesburns2232
      @jamesburns2232 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      But Bob Hoover and his Shrike Commander didn't stall and spin into the ground. 😉😇😀

  • @warped-sliderule
    @warped-sliderule 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    after a refuel, how about looking in the tank to verify pretty blue color, and then sump the fuel to verify pretty blue color with no random stuff at the bottom...

  • @badcompany-w6s
    @badcompany-w6s 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The pilot does not know what kind of fuel the plane uses? Just unbelievable!

  • @rebeccahylant7695
    @rebeccahylant7695 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    When did this happen? Resident of Las Cruces question

    • @davegubbins4428
      @davegubbins4428 23 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Aug 27th 2014 the vid says.

  • @danburch9989
    @danburch9989 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Even though Jet-A was in the fuel tanks, there was just enough avgas in the fuel lines to get the aircraft into trouble before the jet-A shut the engines down. It still might have been a survivable incident. Interstate 10 was available as well as a frontage road along the interstate. Returning to the airport on one engine was a viable action. But when the 2nd engine failed, abort that option and land "straight ahead". The airport is on the north side of I-10 and the crash site is on the south side of I-10. With that, I'm thinking that I-10 and the frontage road might have been the best option even though a potential hazard with a power line cutting across the landing area of the roadways. But with all post accident comments, hindsight is 20/20. My IP drilled into me that total engine failure shortly after takeoff is always lower the nose and land "straight ahead", never return to the airport. Fly the aircraft.

  • @kenrhodes948
    @kenrhodes948 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Had a 421c Golden Eagle which is distinguished by a hump on top of cowling because it is a geared engine. I think this might be a 414. Regardless, with over 500 hours in 421, I never let my plane or BH-206 Jet Ranger be fueled unless I observed…..yes, even in snow or rain.
    The black smoke was a dead giveaway. Also, I realize it’s a computer generated video but Pilot never feathered first failed engine. Always observe fueling.

  • @flyprincess69
    @flyprincess69 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I work for a 4 letter Gov agency that has an aviation program. A Government representative is always is present while fueling. This person #1 confirms the fuel type #2 confirms fuel caps are in place and locked!

  • @kenwhitfield219
    @kenwhitfield219 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The model in this simulation is not a 421C. It is a 402C! 421 has gear driven engines with a hump above the prop shaft.

    • @AlbertHess-xy7ky
      @AlbertHess-xy7ky 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Such an important distinction...

  • @martinthoendel2687
    @martinthoendel2687 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The different filler neck size prevents filling jet fuels into an ac gas openings. The fueling contractor had a fueling contract with the military to fuel their airplanes. They do not have that safety measure built in. That made possible to dispense jet fuel into an av gas tank. They lost the fueling contract

    • @davidsmiths5471
      @davidsmiths5471 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      So that's on the FBO!

  • @billcomerford3021
    @billcomerford3021 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    If the fuel said Avgas why would you put jet fuel in the tank?

    • @AlbertHess-xy7ky
      @AlbertHess-xy7ky 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Where did the plane say AvGas? What did the pilot say to the line boy?

  • @cbonz7734
    @cbonz7734 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    As I remember a 421C burns 20 gph per side so 40 gallons is an hour of fuel, not three hours. With proper leaning you could get it down to 15 gph but 40 gallons would not do three hours.

    • @danburch9989
      @danburch9989 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I doubt the fuel tank was completely empty when the pilot ordered the 40 gals of fuel. Most likely he added that amount to ensure fuel reserve in case he had to divert ot an alternate airport.

    • @cbonz7734
      @cbonz7734 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@danburch9989 True, but my point was the OP stated the pilot added three hours worth of fuel which clearly isn't 40 gallons.

    • @danburch9989
      @danburch9989 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@cbonz7734 The OP may just be stating facts from the incident report without second guessing the reasons for the 40 gal. I don't think the OP is a pilot or he would have known that 40 gal = about 1 hr flight time at 75% power give or take.

  • @cesarrivarola6409
    @cesarrivarola6409 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    it can happens to anyone, but as a pilot double and triple checking it s so crucial , but unfortunately lot of pilots so call "experience " makes the style of fatal mistake. On the ground I know ppl put in their cars diesel instead a average gas , when only requieres normal , this is the first time I heard about this type of massive mistake.

  • @clutchcrgo
    @clutchcrgo 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    How didju get the sound so right?

  • @marlow769
    @marlow769 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I’ve never heard of, in 35 years of flying, about a pilot NOT stipulating the type of fuel in a fuel order, regardless of how obvious the type requirement might be. I guess, my point is, I doubt that the pilot didn’t state the type…but he’s not here to refute the fueler’s claim.

    • @davidsmiths5471
      @davidsmiths5471 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Just curious, so you never came into an FBO late ,parked your plane, and just said give 30 a side and kept going??

  • @kailaniandi
    @kailaniandi 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The pilot is responsible for aircraft safety. That's it. He should have inspected the fuel supply on delivery. He was responsible for the aircraft and the passengers. RIP

    • @davidsmiths5471
      @davidsmiths5471 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      If you leave an aircraft on any FBO they are responsible for that aircraft

    • @AlbertHess-xy7ky
      @AlbertHess-xy7ky 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@davidsmiths5471 The pilot has the primary responsibility for what is in the tanks. Be it Jet A, AvGas, water or air.

    • @davidsmiths5471
      @davidsmiths5471 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@AlbertHess-xy7ky Please explain how's that actually works if the pilot is not there!

  • @hendrik4978-b4j
    @hendrik4978-b4j 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Yea, easy to blame a dead pilot! The idiot who was refueling should be able to read - or was this a case of employing someone who could not read English in NM? It will take a lot to convince me the pilot was there when the refueling was taking place - watching in other words! This more seems like a blame the pilot as he cannot contradict the technician and they do not want to accept liability, at any cost!

    • @davidsmiths5471
      @davidsmiths5471 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      WOW

    • @danburch9989
      @danburch9989 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The pilot in command (PIC) is ALWAYS the first, last and only person in charge of the aircraft and its safe operation. He can deligate tasks but the pilot retains responsibility to ensure it's done properly.

    • @davidsmiths5471
      @davidsmiths5471 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@danburch9989 So what's your point?

    • @danburch9989
      @danburch9989 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@davidsmiths5471 The pilot shifted the responsibility of getting the correct fuel to the lineboy and he assumed the lineboy put in the correct fuel

    • @davidsmiths5471
      @davidsmiths5471 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@danburch9989 So you skip the the FBO that trains the line person and their supervision that tragic day! An FBO that has safe guards in place ,this never happens! Correct nozzles,signage on every truck! Trucks parked in different areas! The list is long

  • @HyperSpaceProphet
    @HyperSpaceProphet 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Continental, not Lycoming.
    This was an entirely survivable incident. (yes, I am a multiengine pilot, yes I am qualified to comment, Yes, I have flown 421's.).
    The aircraft should not have "stalled" unless the pilot tried to stretch the glide and lost too much energy and got too slow.. Better to land under control off airport than to lose all ability to fly at too low a speed , lose control, and crash.
    ALWAYS watch them refuel., always make sure it is the proper fuel, always sample the fuel after refueling. Any one of those would have caught the error.
    This was a failure on the pilot.

    • @AlbertHess-xy7ky
      @AlbertHess-xy7ky 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You are a qualified to comment if you have survived a similar accident.

  • @williamhanna2613
    @williamhanna2613 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    if i wanted to read about it i would buy the book

  • @RebuildingScotland
    @RebuildingScotland 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Pilot tried the impossible turn with the usual consequences.

  • @AxtionMag
    @AxtionMag 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    How does this happen? So very sad! RIP to all who perished.

  • @stevehicks8944
    @stevehicks8944 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The aircraft shown is a Cessna 402C, not a Cessna 421C. Lycoming never manufactured the GTSIO-520; TCM or Continental did. It is ALWAYS the responsibility of the PIC to ensure his aircraft has been fueled with the correct fuel. I trained many line service techs over the years; WHY are aircraft still being mis-fueled?

  • @robertwatson818
    @robertwatson818 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    How and why did this aircraft stall? He had an entire desert to land in yet stalled the aircraft and killed everyone.

  • @nickcaci7238
    @nickcaci7238 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Who hired that fuel truck guy with no common sense of aviation engines? And who trained that pilot? Probably didn’t perform a fuel sump check and no excuse for not maintaining proper airspeed.

  • @Jumbojetfueler
    @Jumbojetfueler หลายเดือนก่อน

    Feather both props lower the nose...maintain best glide speed...leave the gear up...full flaps when the field is made. Make a phone call for a ride.

  • @rongenise7006
    @rongenise7006 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What, no incompatibility nozzle requirement? Maybe sensors detecting the type of fuel? Surely the NTSB could do better than “check the fuel type”.

  • @davidmccann9811
    @davidmccann9811 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Can't manufacturers use different filler connections, one kind for jet fuel and a different one for AVGAS?

  • @davedave5787
    @davedave5787 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Glad that pilot is not flying anymore!!! Great MPC ( story is in my hometown)

  • @hendrikdebruin4012
    @hendrikdebruin4012 15 วันที่ผ่านมา

    You are a technician in charge of refuelling aircraft. How tough a job can that be? And you cannot read? Just yesterday when I was filling up my car I read the instructions inside the filler door. Hmmm 91, 93 or 95. Not 87 or 97. What a class moron - should be charged with manslaughter and go to jail for life. I hope he has nightmares for his entire life. What types of idiots are employed by aviation companies? One should think that they should at least be literate? The pilot was a class idiot himself. While he had some speed he should have looked for a flat place to land and there was plenty. Defective thinking to always think you must return to the airport.

  • @cpy
    @cpy 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    2,432 flight hours, but can't be bothered to sump the tanks....wow

    • @greysheeum
      @greysheeum 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      You don’t sump freshly fueled tanks.

    • @nedsackmann2215
      @nedsackmann2215 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      I wonder if sumping would have noticed the fuel,the jet fuel would have been on top of the fluid,the engines ran for 10 minutes on the ground and then got in the air.

    • @AlbertHess-xy7ky
      @AlbertHess-xy7ky 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@greysheeum You supervise the fueling of your aircraft, you do not not leave it to some pimply faced kid in a go nowhere job. Always sump, two or three times, after fueling.

    • @AlbertHess-xy7ky
      @AlbertHess-xy7ky 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@nedsackmann2215 Gas weighs 6 pounds per gallon. Jet fuel weighs closer to 7. You take on big load of fuel it will soon be in the sump.

    • @davidsmiths5471
      @davidsmiths5471 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@AlbertHess-xy7kyHow's that work actually!

  • @johnschulenberg7560
    @johnschulenberg7560 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Over Macho Grande?

    • @krisbast7481
      @krisbast7481 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      No.. I don't think I'll ever get over Macho Grande! Those wounds run pretty deep.

    • @starguy2718
      @starguy2718 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The decision to proceed is yours.

  • @MrCrystalcranium
    @MrCrystalcranium 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    What IQ do you need as a fueler to recognize the difference between a jet and a prop aircraft? Sounds like his excuse was “Hey he watched me and and he he didn’t tell me I was doing it wrong…It’s not my fault!”

    • @lbowsk
      @lbowsk 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Do you know what a turbo prop burns?

    • @MrCrystalcranium
      @MrCrystalcranium 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@lbowsk This isn’t a turboprop if that’s what you’re talking about. It’s an opposed 6 cylinder piston engine.

    • @lbowsk
      @lbowsk 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@MrCrystalcranium I am well aware of that. You questioned why a guy would put jet A in a propeller driven plane. And I am simply pointing out that not all props burn Avgas.

    • @patricnoK
      @patricnoK 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Hey guys, the question is how did he get the much larger and flattened jet A nozzle into the smaller and round avgas filler neck?
      Aviation gasoline (avgas) nozzles are small and round and fit into smaller opening fuel filler ports while jet fuel nozzles are larger and flattened like a duck's bill, requiring a larger fuel filler port.

    • @greysheeum
      @greysheeum 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@patricnoKThe truck may not have a duck bill nozzle. In fact, I haven’t seen a flat jet fuel nozzle at an FBO in a good while.

  • @TheAirportSteven
    @TheAirportSteven หลายเดือนก่อน

    The aircraft in this Video is NOT a 421C. You're showing a Cessna 402. And the Cessna 421C does NOT have Lycoming engines. They are CONTINENTAL GTSIO-520's

  • @paynederick8573
    @paynederick8573 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The displayed aircraft was not a Cessna 421C, I believe it was a 402, or 441.
    Not withstanding that, it was the PIC responsiblity to ensue the correct fuel and quantity was purchased.
    Any pilot who know about Avgas and Jet A fuel could smell the dispensing unit and recognize the difference.
    I've an engine as a young Pilot, fly for 35 minutes, made the approach and landed safely.
    Pilot error all the way.
    RIP.

  • @bachblues2
    @bachblues2 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The refueling truck operator should have also noticed the label and refrain from pumping the jet fuel, he well knew was being transported.

    • @davidsmiths5471
      @davidsmiths5471 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      So then actually the company is at fault and the FBO!

  • @donreinke5863
    @donreinke5863 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is apples and oranges as Im describing an automotive engine and aircraft engines are of course different.
    I ran out of gasoline while driving, but had a couple gallons of diesel in the back that I used for a steam pressure washer. I put it in the tank, the engine started and while it had less power than normal and smoked, it did run.
    I dont know how different jet fuel is from diesel, but Ive heard they are similar.

    • @AlbertHess-xy7ky
      @AlbertHess-xy7ky 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It was probably running on more gas than diesel.

  • @tungstenkid2271
    @tungstenkid2271 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Same old story as in countless other vids; the pilots try to turn back and stall, it's killed lots of pilots who don't seem to have heard of the old aviation saying- "Never turn back".
    It's because using the ailerons in the turn messes up the airflow over the inside wing which is always the one that stalls.

  • @jeffperry601
    @jeffperry601 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    A fuel man that cannot read warnings on the fuel caps doesn't know the difference between a gasoline-powered engine and a jet engine you have to be kidding me

    • @AlbertHess-xy7ky
      @AlbertHess-xy7ky 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What warnings were on the the caps? You expect a $15 an hour fuel person to to know the difference between a gasoline-powered engine and a jet engine? Piston engines use jet fuel. You have to be kidding me.
      A pilot does does not check his fuel receipt, and sniff the tanks.
      He is dead.

  • @tc1904
    @tc1904 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Graphic image is a Cessna 402C

  • @backcountyrpilot
    @backcountyrpilot 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Jet fuel is essentially Diesel. I doubt that it damaged the engine, it simply requires more heat to ignite than gasoline, so the engines stopped running when there was not enough avgas remaining in the system.
    The pilot should have sumped the tanks to verify that the fuel was blue and smelled like avgas.
    There was no reason to stall. He panicked and pulled back to far and/or turned too steeply.

    • @davidsmiths5471
      @davidsmiths5471 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      So he sumps the tanks what comes out

    • @AlbertHess-xy7ky
      @AlbertHess-xy7ky 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@davidsmiths5471 Jet A. Like water Jet A is heavier than AvGas

    • @davidsmiths5471
      @davidsmiths5471 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@AlbertHess-xy7ky So you think it just removes AVgas! From all the lines and little sump pipes! Then please explain how this aircraft was able to fly at all?

    • @AlbertHess-xy7ky
      @AlbertHess-xy7ky 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@davidsmiths5471 It does not remove, it displaces, Jet A is much heavier. There was still AV gas in the fuel system.

    • @AlbertHess-xy7ky
      @AlbertHess-xy7ky 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@davidsmiths5471 Sniff test.

  • @maartenvanleeuwen617
    @maartenvanleeuwen617 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Strange. When you get refueled by a truck, you know there is great danger for the wrong fuel to be delivered so you check like 5 times. Then, why enter a stall? Nothing to do with low altitude. Set the plane on the ground even a rough landing is highly likely survivable. A stall almost never is.

  • @irocker350
    @irocker350 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I spent several years as a lineman at FBOs in Billings, Montana, Las Vegas and Reno and that is a mistake that has no excuse, anyone that is employed as a line tech should know instantly just by looking at an aircraft's engines or even just the aircraft type written on the fuel ticket, if it takes Avgas or Jet A, the fuel trucks are ALL clearly marked as JET A or Avgas and many have different nozzles and there are black labels (sticker) around the fuel caps for JET A and green or blue for avgas, (in the old days there were also red or purple stickers for the avgas grade required). Also, there were very few times (in my own experience) in which the pilot was present during fueling.. I would imagine that at the very LEAST the fueler got fired after submitting to a drug test and maybe faced charges of negligent homicide.

  • @jeffro221
    @jeffro221 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This proves once again to me why I have no interest in general avaiation.....too many other people you have no control over who can easily kill you.

    • @AlbertHess-xy7ky
      @AlbertHess-xy7ky 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You have control on commerical?

    • @jeffro221
      @jeffro221 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@AlbertHess-xy7ky True, but the level of competence is much higher in commerical. Everybody is in general avaiation no matter what level of competence.

    • @AlbertHess-xy7ky
      @AlbertHess-xy7ky 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@jeffro221 Same goes for driving. You have no control.

  • @GeeBee909
    @GeeBee909 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Just like at a car gas station, the two different fuels should have handles of different colors (for example red pump handle for "avgas " and green for "jet fuel") and it should be common knowledge which is which. This would have prevented this tragic matter, which was SO easily preventable.

    • @AlbertHess-xy7ky
      @AlbertHess-xy7ky 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      How do you tell which fuel goes in which plane? Are fuel caps different colors for different types??

    • @GeeBee909
      @GeeBee909 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@AlbertHess-xy7ky I believe he said the fuel cap or pump said "avgas" on it

  • @Madskills810
    @Madskills810 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    You have to fly the airplane all the time. I would bet that the pilot was not present when the refueling was completed either. Always be present when having the airplane refueled.

  • @MrBharper1978
    @MrBharper1978 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    How the hell does the guy doing the refueling not know that airplane needed 100ll? Wow.

    • @davidsmiths5471
      @davidsmiths5471 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Poor training and bad equipment

  • @scottmoseley5122
    @scottmoseley5122 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Id prefer a voice over actually.. but nice work.

  • @jmy6050
    @jmy6050 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Being a technical head and past aircraft engineer the 520 engine belongs to Continental not Lycoming

  • @eucliduschaumeau8813
    @eucliduschaumeau8813 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I ruined a perfectly good lawnmower by putting two-cycle fuel into it instead of gas. That’s a mistake that you only make once.

  • @jamescoffey3176
    @jamescoffey3176 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I owned a 421C- this picture is not a 421C.

  • @markcardwell
    @markcardwell 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    You can easily smell the difference from 20 feet

  • @prayingpilot3806
    @prayingpilot3806 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I don't understand this . With plenty of open desert and roads why not take a chance on a forced landing?

  • @80sCrazyCatDadNGunAddiction
    @80sCrazyCatDadNGunAddiction 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    My BMW would have the serious shits too if I put 87 in it.

  • @Cruiser777
    @Cruiser777 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    That airplane has 375 horsepower turbocharged. If it's not heavily loaded, it can fly with one engine with no problem. We did it before😅 we used to call that airplane the hanger queen for sure, good plane but I didn't like the design of the fuel system running through the turbocharger when it's red hot according to the video he turned towards the running Engine which is good but he didn't feather the engine shut down. RIP

    • @AlbertHess-xy7ky
      @AlbertHess-xy7ky 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      He allowed his plane to be mis-fueled.

  • @VerissimusAurelius
    @VerissimusAurelius 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I suspected they would probably have loaded jet fuel into the fuel tanks… From day one we are taught as pilots to maintain airspeed… This was probably a very survivable situation.