No. There are still some advantages to the Rangeman. Stay in that one if you’re happy with it. I’m testing out the AE-1500 as we speak. It’s great at night. You don’t even need to illuminate it if there’s dim ambient light.
I bought the 9500 off your recommendation, Jim, then turned around and bought the GWG-2000 MudMaster as well. I am enjoying them both. I think you would like the MudMaster better than the CasioOak, but the price jump is big. You REALLY have to like reading Analog Time on a watch, because EVERYTHING is harder to set on the 2000 over the 9500. But it is fun…. Great videos.
@@JimKinkade I have the OG Mudmaster but no solar meant the batteries only lasted like 2 yrs. It sits dead on my nightstand... Automatic or solar going forward. I do land surveying and I give watches (and anything pretty much) hell.
What sort money one can make working in your line of work, approximately?
It all depends on the price of oil.
I really like watching these.
Thanks! I have fun making them!
Which one better h1000 vs h2000??
The H2000 is better in a number of different ways.
How accurate is the sleep tracking function in H2000?
Good question. I haven’t really tested it out yet so I can’t give you a good answer. But I’ll let you know when I do.
@@JimKinkade Thanks a lot. Sleep tracker function is one of the major attraction in H2000.
@@prince2132 ok. My plan is to start testing the sleep tracking on October 26. I’ll get the results by November 1, Lord willing.
@@JimKinkade Great
I m using gw-9400. Wondering should buy gw-9500. Great video, thanks man. Pls share ur opinion about ae-1500wh. Tc👍
No. There are still some advantages to the Rangeman. Stay in that one if you’re happy with it. I’m testing out the AE-1500 as we speak. It’s great at night. You don’t even need to illuminate it if there’s dim ambient light.
@@JimKinkadewhat would be those advantages? Having hard time choosing between 9400 and 9500.
@@BrunoPulitika one advantage of the Rangeman is that the screen has less glare so even though the numbers are smaller it is easier to read.
Why dont you wear GWG 2000 or latest mudmaster it gonna dress handsome on yr wrist.
Good idea! I’d love that! It will take a while to save up for one so check back in later.
I bought the 9500 off your recommendation, Jim, then turned around and bought the GWG-2000 MudMaster as well. I am enjoying them both. I think you would like the MudMaster better than the CasioOak, but the price jump is big. You REALLY have to like reading Analog Time on a watch, because EVERYTHING is harder to set on the 2000 over the 9500. But it is fun…. Great videos.
I wanted to get the green 9500, I've seen too many videos of how hard it is to read. Positive display on the way.....
The positive display is the way to go. I think you'll like the 9500.
@@JimKinkade I have the OG Mudmaster but no solar meant the batteries only lasted like 2 yrs. It sits dead on my nightstand... Automatic or solar going forward. I do land surveying and I give watches (and anything pretty much) hell.
Watching this the second time cuz can’t decide which to get😂
Yea, it’s a tough call. If you work out a lot the H2000 is good. But if you’re rough on your watches the Mudman is really rugged.