2:24 - Do you follow a madhab? 10:13 - What is the ruling on those that miss Salah ? 15:16 - Is the Niqab fardh? 21:28 - is Smoking haram? 23:35 - Is all seafood permissible? 25:43 - Is eating from McDonald's halal in the west? 32:16 - Fiqh of Divorce (3x talaq) 35:46 - Can we give salam to non-Muslims ? 36:35 - Do Salafis have respect for Madhabs? 40:33 - Would you give dawah or a talk in a Non-Salafi masjid? 45:59 - Can there be brotherhood with those that practice Istighstha or Mawlid etc ? 49:36 - Can there ever be unity with those who have a different Aqidah? 57:37 - His confrontation with Daniel Haqiqatjou last year. 1:04:53 - Can we unite behind a khalif with a different Aqidah ? 1:10:41 - issue of obeying the ruler 1:16:18 - Can you criticise the ruler ? 1:27:25 - Did you really get stabbed ?
Remember the path or manhajj the prophet of Islam left for the ummah are the TWO WEIGHTY MATTERS the Qur'an and Ahlulbayt Known is hadith Thaqalayn Thank you
Shaykh does good work defending Islam against the enemies of Islam, the muslim community appreciates this and hopes shaykh Uthman carries on with his work against the enemies of Islam
As salaamu alaykum brothers, sisters, friends and foes. Please like, share and comment on this video, as well as subscribing to the 5Pillars TH-cam channel! Jazakallah khayran.
And when the fitnah (trial, discord) occurred in the time of ʿUthmān, some people said to Usāmah bin Zayd , ‘Will you not speak to ʿUthmān?’ So he said, ‘Do you think that I have not spoken to him, just because you have not heard it from me? Verily I will speak to him concerning what is between him and me, without opening an affair which I would not like to be the first to open.’ [An authentic narration: Related by Ahmad (3/403) and Ibn Abī ʿĀsim (2/521) So when they (the Khārijites) opened it, evil took place in the time of ʿUthmān . They opposed ʿUthmān openly, thus completing the tribulations, fighting and corruption, which has not ceased to affect the people to this day, was brought about. And this caused the tribulation to occur between ʿAlī and Muʿāwiyah, and ʿUthmān was killed for these reasons …
Remember brother, the prophet of Islam left TWO weighty matters the Qur'an and ahlulbayt for source of guidance after him Not the sahaabah. Pls check N Investigate
It is the mainly Salafi movement that have caused significant division's in the UK. No hanafi has ever gone to a Shafi and telling them they are deviant and need to follow 'quran & sunnah'. They have casues mass confusion and fitna amkngst the youth from the 1990's in the Uk.
I don’t think that’s true at all. No salafi goes around calling followers of the madahib deviants.. the only people they call deviants when applies to aqeedah which is a whole different topic.
@@aklimurraza2626 Sorry brother but you must be living under a rock if you think that is the case. I reside in Birmingham and since the the late 80's , we had literally salafis, almost militant into thier approach in our areas going around speaking to the youth telling them ridiculous things like imam Abu Hanifa only knew 40 hadiths ! Stating they are not following quran and sunnah. I have seen and experienced this personally so please stop with the nonsense
@@ragayseven2260 4 mathhabs are Athari in Aqida & salafi in fiq... what's Numan's mom's mathhab? what is difference in Usul of 4 mathhab in fiq? Imam Ahmad made tabdi on kulabis who taught Mid life Hasan Ashari before he repented to Athari, proof he wrote Usul Dayana affirmed by Asakir, Dhahabi & I think Bayhaqi.
Allahumma baarik. Alhamdullah, Ya Allah. Many many so many syubhat that I have, Alhamdulillah with Allah's will, I come across this video and NOW, Alhamdulillah It make absolutely sense. It clear up of all my syubhat that I had Jazakallahu khayran sheikh Uthman, May Allah grant you jannah. - "May Allah unite us upon Quran, Sunnah and the way of salafulummah" (like sheikh Uthman said in closing of this video) ❤ -
Sheikh uthman, you’re a good role model for the Muslims because you put in the work for Allah SWT, see how Allah has elevated you and made you loved worldwide, may Allah increase you in strength and guidance!
Have you ever heard about the Arab Spring and how it was influenced by the Arab diaspora (mainly) on social media like Facebook or Reddit? Or were you too busy painting the walls of your cave?
@@human0_0skull akhi speak respectfully and show good manners, your meant to love me for the sake of Allah. The Arabs in those nations used social medias themselves to organise and take part in the Arab Spring. In Egypt, Tunisia there wasn't bloodshed, Libya has conspiracy theories surrounding it.
Masha Allah, very good interview. Thanks for clarifying on Daniel’s discussion, I have great respect now for YQ and Sheikh Uthman the both of them from different positions show sincere intentions to unite the Ummah. Ya Rabb, grant us Aafia 🤲🏾
Umm did you not hear the part where he mentioned sheikh Karim Abuzaid’s refutation on Yasir Qadhi? I think you should go watch that akhi May Allah bless you
I’m still unclear on that cuz at the event DH clearly told him that he would’ve preferred to be contacted privately on those questions. One of them must be lying.
@@ahmedyamani7388 Brother don’t accuse fellow Muslim brothers of potentially lying. There was some sort of misunderstanding and we should move on. Don’t let it distract us.
@@sammu Brother both of them have been exposed lying at different times. This is nothing new, so me claiming that one of them has to have lied here is not a stretch giving the contradictions displayed. Also everyone must be held to account, esp brothers with big platforms. We can’t just dismiss and sweep everything under the carpet.
@@AB-xx7hy And when the fitnah (trial, discord) occurred in the time of ʿUthmān, some people said to Usāmah bin Zayd , ‘Will you not speak to ʿUthmān?’ So he said, ‘Do you think that I have not spoken to him, just because you have not heard it from me? Verily I will speak to him concerning what is between him and me, without opening an affair which I would not like to be the first to open.’ [An authentic narration: Related by Ahmad (3/403) and Ibn Abī ʿĀsim (2/521) So when they (the Khārijites) opened it, evil took place in the time of ʿUthmān . They opposed ʿUthmān openly, thus completing the tribulations, fighting and corruption, which has not ceased to affect the people to this day, was brought about. And this caused the tribulation to occur between ʿAlī and Muʿāwiyah, and ʿUthmān was killed for these reasons …
On the issue of rebelling against rulers, I can respect the fact the shaykh did not blanketly deny its permissibility, like so many of these madkhalis, however he didn't make it clear what the conditions of rebellion and also criticism of rulers are. If this is something he studied in fiqh then it should be relatively easy to give an overview in this podcast, we will see if he does it in a second podcast...
Bro as always, such issues usually lie between the 2 extremes. I haven't seen that part yet where the sheikh said this, but my gut feel says on this matter the truth is somewhere in between what madkhalis and what Haqiqatjou and his gang say. Sheikh ibn uthaymeen actually said it was permissible but mentioned clear conditions. Its on the masjid dar us sunnah channel. A VERY CLEAR, PRECISE video mentioning 4-5 conditions
Ka’b ibn ‘Ujrah reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “Verily, rulers will come after me and whoever enters their audience, affirms their lies, and supports their oppression, they are not part of me and I am not part of them. They will have no presence at the Fountain. Whoever does not enter their audience, does not support their oppression, and does not affirm their lies, he is part of me and I am part of him. He will be present at the Fountain.” Source: Sunan al-Tirmidhī 2190 Grade: Sahih (authentic)
@shoIslam - why is your name show Islam? Do you advice ppl to be open with Islam. If do good but be accurate in speech. Also you error on so called Madkhalis, they say you can rebel but has conditions... too
Do you not see what happened to the muslim countries recently that revolt the leader? Now they are dead, and the same people who revolt want them back. Crying because the life was better.
@@amdol the problem is they understood the problem but not the cure. They needed to replace the leadership with an Islamic caliphate and not another secular democratic regime.
5pillars didn’t do justice in this podcast. Uthman Farooq challenged the thoughts of deobandis again and is refusing to sit with deobandis yet claims to be willing to sit with them. To question the aqeedah of great scholars isn’t a light matter and needs to be challenged. Talk about unity is cheap when you don’t back it up
Deobandis do have a very little part that is no way related to Islam, I can vouch for it being a south Indian Muslim and living in a community encircled with people from nizamuddin markaz. The book they read is so called fazaile aamal contains lot more made up stories than discussing about sahee hadiths. May Allah protect and guide us all.. Aameen
Usman said don’t criticize the ruler publicly from 1:17 only privately again this is also been debunked by bro Hajji of how the salaf criticized the ruler publicly not privately
And when the fitnah (trial, discord) occurred in the time of ʿUthmān, some people said to Usāmah bin Zayd , ‘Will you not speak to ʿUthmān?’ So he said, ‘Do you think that I have not spoken to him, just because you have not heard it from me? Verily I will speak to him concerning what is between him and me, without opening an affair which I would not like to be the first to open.’ [An authentic narration: Related by Ahmad (3/403) and Ibn Abī ʿĀsim (2/521) So when they (the Khārijites) opened it, evil took place in the time of ʿUthmān . They opposed ʿUthmān openly, thus completing the tribulations, fighting and corruption, which has not ceased to affect the people to this day, was brought about. And this caused the tribulation to occur between ʿAlī and Muʿāwiyah, and ʿUthmān was killed for these reasons …
Masha’Allaah shaykh uthman dealt with the questions. You can’t be concerned that the rulers of Muslim countries are kaffir but your living under a kafir ruler in the UK 😂 🇬🇧
Sheikh I am a Maldivian , love this podcast, n if you want to know if you want to a maldivian you have to be a muslim as far as I know n the country by law is an Islamic country. Hope you vist there soon😊
@@Figleaf-Bicarbonate MBS is not infallible nor should he be judged with such a standard. First of all you don't know his intentions, it could be to purchase it so that it isn't on public display, seeing as the painting was supposed to be shown at a gallery in Abu Dhabi in 2018 but since MBS purchased it, nobody has laid eyes upon it to the public's knowledge since 2017. Making the volume of adhaan was in response to complaints from citizens, so your qualm on that issue is with the residents, not the one acting on ther complaints, and lowering the max volume affects someone's deen how? Does it go in the Qur'aan and Sunnaah to lower the volume of the adhaan? Aren't we supposed to be a considerate people? If everyone recited at the top of their lungs during salah nobody in the masjid would be able to concentrate. The clubs opening, I can only find news on a club opening in Jeddah in 2019, which the GEA of SA stated they did not authorise, but rather the organisers took advantage of a license granted for a different event altogether to open the club. So everything is not as it seems. Either way, it should be removed but again, that shouldn't effect your ability to practise your religion and be the best Muslim you can be. BaarakAllaahu feekum.
@@Figleaf-BicarbonateHow about you worried about your sister, your mom and dad at home. Why do you stretch your hand where it doesn’t reach?🤷🏽♂️ Does knowing him bought the picture increases your eman?? How about you leave things that concern you and focus on things that concern you. Just know that I love you for the sake of Allah.❤️❤️
Not ruling by the laws of Allah is considered Major Kufr according to many Scholars, so it’s not a condition that one expresses their disbelief verbally, also the view that we don’t live in those lands and therefore we shouldn’t comment on their affairs is incorrect since we are one Ummah and what happens around the World concerns us and affects Muslims in different ways both economically and politically, but he’s correct in that the right procedure should be followed in addressing the matter, unfortunately what we see in the Muslim lands is sad from both the ruling governments and the people.
Ka’b ibn ‘Ujrah reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “Verily, rulers will come after me and whoever enters their audience, affirms their lies, and supports their oppression, they are not part of me and I am not part of them. They will have no presence at the Fountain. Whoever does not enter their audience, does not support their oppression, and does not affirm their lies, he is part of me and I am part of him. He will be present at the Fountain.” Source: Sunan al-Tirmidhī 2190 Grade: Sahih (authentic) according
Do you, your acquaintances, and the generality of myslim laymen rule by what Allah has ordered in your own homes these days?.. Hmm, yet here we are NOT making takfir on Muslims based on that. The rulers are a reflection of our own inner state as muslims. You want umar in charge act like those under umar at his time. We can complain all day, but NOTHING will change until we take accountability and apply the shari'ah to ourselves. There is no denying that there's corruption in land, but who is it to blame really? We've turned away from the shari'ah and we act like it isnt our fault.
@@pursueexcellence7737 that saying is well known from ibn Abbas (RA) but it’s context doesn’t apply to the one who makes laws to govern and judge the people in the land, what you are quoting is to do with judging in a matter away from the shariah, ie, not applying the command of Allah in a particular matter or so, not in cases where the actual laws are codified and are contrary to that of the shariah, this distinction is well known,
@@getout0101 Who before you preceded in this (wishy-washy) distinction of the difference between it being kufr Akbar and As-ghar being "judging in the land" and "judging in a particular matter"? Because there are over 30 salaf who have reported ijmaa' that a father not ruling by the ruling of Allah by allowing his child to have a girlfriend is commiting major kufr when he believes Allah has not made it haram, otherwise, it is only a sin.
Very dissapointed in Uthman ibn Farooq. He turns out to be on the Madkhali manhaj. If I was there I would have asked him some hard questions where I am sure I wouldnt have gotten a straight answer. First question: If disobeying the rules makes on a Khawarij then tell me, what is Ibn Saud, who overthrew the Sharif of Makkah in a violent coup with the help of the British? Second question: He considers modern national state rulers as muslims. Tell me, if they dont apply the Sharia then does that make them Taghut? And if they are Taghut, then they cannot be muslims and we must not obey them. Third question: National state goes against the nature of Islam, which is all about destroying falsehood and uniting the people under ONE imam. How can Sh. Uthman be in favor of national state rulers, if it goes directly against Islam?
Your questions are loaded with baseless assumptions and a clear agenda to create corruption, sitting in your home while calling for civil war and rebellion. The methodology of Iblees, the way of those dogs of the Hellfire.
@hamzanocap maybe you never went to school but valid criticism is important way to challenge a disputed claim and see if it holds up to the truth. Criticism does not cause "rebellion". Absurd ideological nonesense that's fed to you by state sponsored "scholarship" Sitting in our home swith our critical faculties in check and the ability to criticise non muslim goverments we live under and question them for opression, and also the Muslim ones. No double standard like the confused lot. FYI salafis have criticised foreign rulers themselves and ibn baz even called saddam a kafir, so it's a weird double standard pushed to preserve the power of the gulf despots
The differences between Rabee al Madkhali and other salafi scholars are political. They share sam fiqh and aqeedah even though each scholar contradicts themself many times. Wahabbism was created for political control and sabotage of the ummah. The madkhalis are just another wave of this sect.
He answered the questions about the rulers and rebellion with evidence from the quran and sunnah. The deen is based on quran and sunnah, not your emotions.
@usmanchaudhary1765 he didn't really. He offered the same tired replies. Not once did he refer to Quran and Sunnah when he spoke about why we can't criticise foreign leaders. Like why can't a Muslim in UK criticise the horrible actions of mbs? His rationale of why they shouldn't is absurd and based on his assertion that doing so harms the youth in the country. Such a viewpoint is absurd as it tries to make criticism of a foreign stranger the reason a youth or his family is persecuted, instead of the OBVIOUS elephant in the room; the tyranny of the ruler. His view point is essentially saying the random criticism is causing harm not tyranny and opression of the one being criticised. He didn't refer to textual evidence for his argument, rather his person reasons.
I appreciate Sheikh Uthman and his desire to bring the ummah together. That being said, I find something very wrong with his stance on criticizing rulers. He switched back and forth between Khalifa and ruler. Then when he said "why don't you go to those countries and say the same thing" and the brother responded "well they will arrest and kill me", the sheikh responded "exactly". So we are just supposed to be completely silent (as the oppressors want) while they arrest and torture our scholars? While they sell out to the west? As they work with foreign intelligence agencies against the Muslims? As they destabilize other countries, installing and propping up more oppressors? Changing the school curriculum to pervert the masses? Introducing fitnah where it didnt exist before? All while inviting foreign soldiers to establish themselves on your land? If the argument is that blood will be shed, my response is that blood has already been shed and is being shed. I'm not saying that the people in any specific country should just get up and start fighting the government, but calling it out seems like a reasonable first step.
And when the fitnah (trial, discord) occurred in the time of ʿUthmān, some people said to Usāmah bin Zayd , ‘Will you not speak to ʿUthmān?’ So he said, ‘Do you think that I have not spoken to him, just because you have not heard it from me? Verily I will speak to him concerning what is between him and me, without opening an affair which I would not like to be the first to open.’ [An authentic narration: Related by Ahmad (3/403) and Ibn Abī ʿĀsim (2/521) So when they (the Khārijites) opened it, evil took place in the time of ʿUthmān . They opposed ʿUthmān openly, thus completing the tribulations, fighting and corruption, which has not ceased to affect the people to this day, was brought about. And this caused the tribulation to occur between ʿAlī and Muʿāwiyah, and ʿUthmān was killed for these reasons …
@pvcrma1 I understand, but what is the solution? Do we sit back and stay quiet while the ummah deteriorates? Our children continue being brainwashed in schools? Countries being destabilized? I'm not suggesting armed conflict. I'm not even claiming to have an answer, but is saying that allowing Halloween celebrations in the Arabian peninsula haram too far? Is saying that the rulers allowing clubs and bars in the land of the sahaba are wrong for doing so, being a khariji? Is speaking out against arresting, torturing, and executing scholars equivalent to calling for violence? I don't think so. Sitting silent and hoping for the best doesn't seem like an intelligent solution. If the people there know it but are unable to speak because of a direct threat of arrest or death, the rest of us have to be silent? If you run your country in such a way, armed rebellion is a NATURAL result. This is a rule that has been seen time and time again in history. Muslim lands or not.
@@Melhimri The solutions are many: - 01. Learn Aqeedah - 02. Return to the Sunnah - 03. Repentance - 04. Go back to the way of companions - 05. Change our condition [13.11] Let us be realistic. The masaajid are practically empty and the potential of the Muslims are only seen on Fridays/Ramadaan/Eed etc. We want victory whilst we are far away from the deen of Allaah! Does that even make sense?
@pvcrma1 that all sounds nice and I'm not discounting it. But, again, our scholars are being locked up. The scholars being promoted by the government are teaching government sponsored Islam. The companions challenged the oppressive rulers on many (and I mean MANY occasions). Many of our most famous scholars were arrested and tortured for publicly disagreeing with leaders. Let me just summarize the situation. The leaders are pushing the population into more and more western ways: introducing clubs, concerts, gambling, bars, mixed events, etc. They are also jailing, torturing, and killing anyone who criticizes them. Then you have a group of people who are saying criticizing them is haram and you are a khariji if you do it. The way of Islam is not to just sit at home and pray. It's قول و عمل. You speak and take action. The Prophet (pbuh) praised speaking a word of truth to a tyrant. If we just sit at home and pray (which was not the way of the Prophets or the companions), and forget about enjoining good and forbidding evil, you are just as blameworthy as the leader. Recall the hadith when Allah was going to destroy a city and the angels said there was a faithful man amongst them. Allah called for his destruction first. Go read about the sahaba and how they openly criticized Hajjaj ibn Yusuf on multiple occasions.
@@MAli99923jazakAllahu khairan for your concise answer. We often forget that to change a situation, we must change ourselves. Speaking out against rulers will change nothing, the best is to focus on yourself and leave the rest to Allah (سُبْحَانَهُ وَ تَعَالَى)
I'm not hanbali I'm shafii asharii. So I love hanbali and their schoolers. Not the khashawia(خشوية) like ibn taymiyya, Abdullah ibn abdulwahhab, ibn favzan, etc.
@@emreyldrim so put in taymiyyah,ibn Kathir,imamul mizzi,ibnl qayyim,imamu thahabi put the in hell fire then and call them names since they don't subscribe ur own understanding of the religion
I find it amazing how Salaafi constantly mispresent history. 1. For the last 40 years, the pseudo-Salafi movement characterized people who followed Madhab as followers of Bidah and people who rejected clear Quran verses and Hadith. When the person following the madhab was not in a position to judge himself, then became reliant on the interpretation of the Quran and Hadith of the Salafi scholar. Who rejected 1400 years of scholarship. A madhab is a methodology on how to interpret the Quran and Hadith, basically having a consistent approach. 2. Also how do they equate scholars directly with Prophet Muhammad (SAW), are you going to follow the scholar or Prophet Muhammad (SAW), you innovator? 3. Also they constantly fail to mention that Imam Abu Hanifah, and Imam Malik are part of the Salaaf!! Imam Abu Hanifah, was Tabiee Imam Malik was Tabiee Imam Shafee was Tab Tabiee Also, both were contemporaries, i.e Imam Abu Hanifah fled from Kufa to Makkah and would meet Imam Malik in Makkah when he came for Haj. Also how Imam Abu Hanifah sent his students to learn from Imam Malik! Imam Shafee was a student of Imam Malik! Also, Imam Hanbali was a student of Imam Shafee. Also how Imam Hanbali stood up against the Mu'tazila. Also how the Salaafi movement glossed over the attack of Kaba and the killing of Hajis in 1979. By students of Sheikh Abd al-Aziz Ibn Baz, the great recent Salaafi scholar. The same scholar who gave a fatwa permitting the US troops to be stationed in Saudi Arabia Hejaz.
in 1979 it was the shia persians who attacked in hajj, there had to be a fatwa made to stop thw rioters since the rioters already killed many hujjaj and police officers. u said salafi reject history while ur here misrepresnting history and misleading the ummah as if "The students of ibn baz" started killing randomly. May Allah give you what u deserve.
Very problematic answers when he used the Hanbali Madhab as they weren’t based on the mu’tamad of the Madhab . The mu’tamad of the Madhab is that leaving salah totally out of laziness is only kufr when the person has is called by the leader , asked to make tawbah , one salah finishes and second one too, repeated etc and even when these conditions drop then they follow the majority as no one can apply these rules except the leader or his substitute not lay people coming on TH-cam channels or people with their families !! And that masalah ( along with dozens of others ) show the difference between the hanbali and salafi madhabs Tawassul is allowed via the rasool صلى الله عليه وسلم is sunnah in the Hanbali Madhab Smoking is makrooh with many of the Hanbali Madhab . He also talks about the strongest view according to himself as if he has reached the level independent jurist which he most certainly hasn’t ( the conditions are very stringent and mentioned in books of usool ) Please don’t conflate the Hanbali and Salafi Madhab , they are TOTALLY separate
Give me evidence that smoking is makrook within the hanbali madhab. Don’t speak about matter of deen without knowledge before people get misled. What if someone smokes because he has seen your comment? All ulema agree that smoking is haram the hanbalis included
@@alameenameen8871 I’m not going to discuss complex Fiqhi masaail with someone I don’t even know … we can say the masalah is a masalah khilaafiiyyah and it’s definitely something better to avoid and can become haram to external reasonings.
@@MK-kz6jn its not a issue of khilaf it was back then in the 80s,90s when ulema didn’t know the harm of smoking. Today we know smoking kills and allah says dont kill yourself. Today there is no khilaf amongst the ulema ,maybe amongst liberal so called imams that have no concern for the shariah of allah.
You are so ignorant bro Salafi is not an madhab is a manhaj is our manhaj and the only true path, under that you have the 4 madhab there are like a tools to practice Islam,
Masha Allah fantastic interview. Full of very very important information regarding the situation of the ummah. She is very learned but also very humble. Great man
People in comments are jokes, judging the dude on anything and everything, you guys should focus on your own lives and if its that important to you maybe you should go put in the work like these dudes and then get on a podcast and say what you gotta say. go fix yourselves. Bunch of scholars in the comments .
I know right. No one is infallible at the end of the day. Shiekh Uthman says he is a student of knowledge at the end of the day. Arrogance has just increased with the internet and keyboard warriors. No one actually is humble enough to sit down with a scholar and learn from them. Anyone taking knowledge for the sake of Allah become more humble, any other motives and they became arrogant.
This was the loveliest and the most awaited discussion for me. My beloved Shaykh Uthman wearing cool 😎 1:34:00 I ask Allah to preserve him and reward him immensely for his knowledge and his works and his tireless efforts day in day out. Love you for the sake of Allah, Shaykh ❤ Furthermore, beloved brother Dilly Hussain - I almost forgot - may Allah reward you for being neutral and impartial yet again for hosting this discussion. As you did in the past between Shaykh Israr and Shaykh Abdurrahman. Some people are good at being neutral? 😂
In all respect... He's incorrect...imam Maliks usool is that he would give preferrence to Amal ahle madinah over a saheeh hadeeth that has singular narration . Also this was not the dawah of the 90s and early 2000... The salafis would denounce following Madhab completely ...some of the super salafis as they were known back then would call Umar a biddati...Inna lillahi...for the ijtihad of 20 rakas
Subhan'Allah you will never find A true Muslim speak ill of his Muslim brother in public, no matter what happens, not to revile him or insult him. And if he finds a mistake or false information from him in the deen , then he corrects the matter without mentioning his name.... This is the path of our Prophet Muhammad peace be upon him, the companions,and the our salaf .. Now you find many who claim to be a Salafi while They even don't know what his Muslim brother right upon him !! backbites and hurts his Muslim brother, making a whole videos about only to convince ppl to get rid of him! Almost making him a kaifer!! Acting like they have good attantion! When they do nothing but fitnah and divided the ummah, they Only use the word Salafi to justify what they doing! May Allah deal them all.
"When Muslims will curse each other in public" This is one of the signs before day of judgment that will invite Allah's anger and lead to the destruction of the muslims. Your correct brother. The people of Iman control their anger and refrain from such backbiting/slandering of their Muslim brethren. Alhamdulillah, Salafists only makeup less than 2 percent of the Ummah, but they are platformed online and have incredible amounts of money at their disposal. I fear for the Ummah
@@AB-xi9im be exactly like a salaf, then go out and expose your brother. you cannot even pray like the salaf, fast like the salaf and you want to publicly criticize like the salaf, possibly this is what lead syrians to the complete disintegration of their nationm you still didn't learn from other's mistakes and you want badly to reproduce their same mistakes, walahi ajaeeb
It's disappointing seeing Br. Uthman being so close to becoming a madkhali. Doesn't he see how these rulers are LITERALLY fighting Islam? Not only in their countries, internationally! Hasn't Br. Uthman seen the tens of scholars jailed in Saudi for example?
Do you deny a clear narration from the Messenger pbuh? Or is your desire to call out the rulers stronger than your submission to Allah and His Prophet? Name calling those of the Sunnah is not new, that is all you people of desires have.
@@hamzanocap The clear narration when the Prophet PBUH says: that the best of martyrs is Hamza, and a man stood up to an oppressive ruler? Or the narration when he PBUH said the Ummah will no longer have any weight/effect if it doesn't say to the oppressor: you are oppressive? (obviously I'm paraphrasing)
@@hamzanocap Rulers that dont apply Sharia are Taghut, their outer appearance doesnt matter bro. Wake up brother, its not about calling out rulers. Its about our heartfelt desire to live in an islamic state, with a Muslim ruler that applies the Sharia.
I love to listen to anyone who speaks the truth and brings evidence. Where is the evidence in what he said? Daniel made a video responding to this. Walahi it is depressing to see muslims engaged in this.
Many of these comments hurt to read. Have shame people!! This is your brother, a very respectable brother at that subhan Allah! yet you call him names and critisize him. If this is how you treat a fellow muslim, i wouldn’t dare think how you'd treat an enemy.
Unfortunately, he is not Hanbali. He looks at the adillah, meaning he is deeming himself knowledgeable enough to do tarjeeh of the scholars' positions.
Yeah because he’s not a BLIND follower like his family who were hanafi were when they weren’t even following the Fiqh of the ahnaaf…you dummies don’t respect knowledge you respect sheep smh
Aren't u allowed to do so after u reach a certain level of understanding of fiqh? The idea is to always go back to Allah and his messenger ﷺ if there is confusion on something
@@maazmustafa2322 In principle, a student can study the adillah of the madhhab. They can understand them or fail to understand them. They may personally be swayed to one position over another WITHIN the madhhab. However, a student of knowledge needs to reach a higher level within the madhhab to actually say which of the two positions is preferable from within the madhhab's principles. This is the level of being a murajjih in one's school. Are there ulema' like this today? yes. But I do not believe Brother Uthman is at that level. He is doing some good da'wah work alhamdulillah. One cannot simply do tarjeeh willy-nilly on the basis of their personal opinion. They need to be schooled in the principles of the madhhab so that their understanding represents a madhhab understanding and not an individualistic understanding. And Allah knows best. I hope I represented the idea well. May Allah bless everyone on this thread, Salafi or otherwise
Daies should just admit that almost all Muslim Ruler have not implemented the Shariah and are guilty of Istibdal(replacing the laws of Allah with other kufr secular laws and system) and Istihlal (Make halal what Allah made Haraam and Vice versa) which are MAJOR KUFR, BUT we are unable to remove them Physically and the harm outweighs the good hence we should not rebel. This could have been an honest point of view rather trying directly or INDIRECTLY trying to defend these rulers. Your gonna be questioned for that on the day of Judgement.
And when the fitnah (trial, discord) occurred in the time of ʿUthmān, some people said to Usāmah bin Zayd , ‘Will you not speak to ʿUthmān?’ So he said, ‘Do you think that I have not spoken to him, just because you have not heard it from me? Verily I will speak to him concerning what is between him and me, without opening an affair which I would not like to be the first to open.’ [An authentic narration: Related by Ahmad (3/403) and Ibn Abī ʿĀsim (2/521) So when they (the Khārijites) opened it, evil took place in the time of ʿUthmān . They opposed ʿUthmān openly, thus completing the tribulations, fighting and corruption, which has not ceased to affect the people to this day, was brought about. And this caused the tribulation to occur between ʿAlī and Muʿāwiyah, and ʿUthmān was killed for these reasons …
@@biggytough2586 Are you saying Islam changed?? Also do you know difference between Quran 5.44 - 47... 3 situations where they don't rule by Allah's law but three different rulings?
Has the issue of him and Karim Abu Zaid attempting to publicly humiliate Daniel H been brought up as well as him showing his 2 faced true colours on that embarrassing podcast with Dawah Man as well as his many Arabic mistakes including from the Quran which was exposed by the brothers in Bradford been brought up as well?
Sheikh Uthman probably gets the most Shahadas than most Daees combined, he has 99 more good things than bad, rather than backbiting him and trying to make him look bad to non Muslims, you can try do to at least 1% of what he does for Islam and the Muslims, try to excuse his mistakes, may Allah guide us all.
@@khairt1731 Evidence is clear on his channel, there are real scholars who might not be perfect at reciting Qur'an, plus if you struggle reading the Qur'an you get two rewards, any more crap?
I love sh Uthman. May Allah protect him and bless his work. The podcast was very beneficial as well msA. I'd really look forward to a 2nd podcast to drill down into the political side. While it's very clear in Islam that we shouldn't rebel against our rulers for oppression alone, we can definitely criticise them. Umar ibn Al'Khattab himself was criticised and allowed it. Imam Ahmed in Hanbal publicly spoke out against the fitna of khalq al-Quran. There are many other examples. However, rebellion is a different issue. The question here should be, is a ruler that actively *hates* Islam and Muslims still a Muslim ruler worth obeying? A ruler who's sole purpose is to shut down any and all Muslim work? At the end of the day, those who say rebellion is haram would still follow those who rebelled if their revolution is successful even if they think it's haram to do so.
Much of the salaf rebelled and fought against the rulers FOR OPPRESSION. For example Abdullah ibn Amr was being oppressed by having his property taken away by the Ummayyad rulers and when asked by someone to just let it go so he wouldn't die, he replied with the famous statement of the Prophet (saw) : "Whoever is killed defending his wealth, he is a martyr". There are many more examples from the tabieen who were in constant battles against the Ummayyads for their oppression The secular rulers of today that are consistently dismantling the Sharia and oppressing Muslims by killing and imprisoning them are much worse than the Ummayyads or Abbasids or Ottomans
Enjoying good and forbiding evil is the deen of Muhammed and Allah. Sheikh Uthman is wrong here. If the ruler promotes evil, we call it out, he is not our Prophet. Same goes for our parents
@@longegg-wind9577 Of course. And if my parents were public figures i would also make the same statements. This is the deen of the Rasool(PBUH), it's not to be played around with
Ka’b ibn ‘Ujrah reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “Verily, rulers will come after me and whoever enters their audience, affirms their lies, and supports their oppression, they are not part of me and I am not part of them. They will have no presence at the Fountain. Whoever does not enter their audience, does not support their oppression, and does not affirm their lies, he is part of me and I am part of him. He will be present at the Fountain.” Source: Sunan al-Tirmidhī 2190 Grade: Sahih (authentic)
I agree with Sheikh with everything but his stance on rulers. His position is very shallow unfortunately. Rulers in the Arab world are actually Western agents who fight Islam publicly. Unfortunately, he didn't mention the historic circumstances around the stance he adopts.
The point is that They didn't obey the ruler when they asking them somthing against islamic laws. So if the ruler asked them somthing with no Islamic conflict then they have to obey him as mentioned in Qur'an and Sunnah.
@@e.k874you have to obey the rulers when they rule with sharia and not with democracy and as long as he doesn’t order you to do something which is haram (like i Imam Maliks time) or Shirk/Kuffr (like in Imam Ahmads time)
@NejadIhsan I agree. In fact linguistically Aqeedah ends up meaning a contract between us and Allah in terms of the beliefs we hold, with the correct ones ending in Jannah and the false ones in Jahannam.
What a ridiculously disingenuous understanding of the madahib. Imam Abu Hanifas r.a. students went agaisnt him. This is true outwardly but what he doesn't mention is that they were at the level of mujahid mutlaq themselves, they were of such a high level they could have derived usool and created their own school. This also shows that the school for over a millenia is developing. With all due respect this Ustadh isn't even on the level of ahlul tarjih never mind mujtahid mutlaq. Meaning he's no way near the calibre of scholar that can directly go back to the quran and Sunnah, derive his own usool and then make ijtihaad on fiqh. He his a muqallid of the Hanaabilah, so how on earth does it make sense to say you follow the quran and Sunnah, when he binds himself to hanbali usool and does taqleed of their rulings. Do you see the contradictions 😂
What I believe Ustaadh is trying to say and I think he did mention it is not to blind follow any imam, key point 👍🏻 when it comes to Quran and sunnah over imams you go with the Quran and sahi hadeeth…never once did he say anything against any of the imams in his speech, he spoke about them all with great respect and status…what he mention was just a fact which seems to burn you and I don’t know what that is brother. You may need therapy.
Very arrogant wahhabe that's why. He think he is something after studying deen few years. He cant even read arabic correctly and man so many mistakes while he recite Quran. Been video documented. He should be shane to tall even madhab. But bjggest issues is. 5 pillar person call him and let him talk about madhab .. It Like this. Someone had a car accident and person havr brain damage and need to be quickly operation. And hospital goes to street and asks if anyone know how to do brain surgery and someone says yes i watch video about it last see. And hospital says ok come to do surgery. This is the Same mindset this guy has.. Useless really.
@@ÜmmetinHizmetkarları haha just in your first sentence, I can see how ignorant you are. You may actually not even be Muslim probably an atheist or Christian lol… News flash !!!! Aqeedah is more important than being able to read Quran with tajweed or making mistake in pronunciation… You must be another hater !! Que up buddy there’s plenty of haters against the truth! Who and what is wahaabi ?? Lol so ignorant go and learn !
@@ABC-wi6vt This is a great museeba amongst the ummah nowadays. The main cause of this is ignorance and fanaticism. A lot of people know Uthman Ibn Farooq has no idea when it comes to the basic of the deen and yet they promote him and appointed him as a community leader and imam in the US because of their ego. They don’t care about the damage and misguidance of the individual which will effect the ummah at large. الله المستعان!
This was an excellent episode, you really did your homework Dilly and asked precise, need to know questions He was very clear and we ended up seeing an authentic unequivocal discussion
Why do 5pillars finds the need to do a podcast on Fiqhi issues with the likes of "Shaykh" Usman who cannot read Surah Al Fatiha properly with Tajweed. This is how you lose credibility.
Usman tells Daniel so your not a scholar, so you don’t teach fiqh. Why is Usman khan teaching Fiqh and Aqeedah because he said he’s also not a Scholar? This guy is super deceitful.
I find the double standard by Salafi Madkhalis amazing and how much they lack self-awareness. Calling the Ottoman Caliphs unIslamic, while at the same time defending rulers who were responsible for the murder of Jamal Khashoggi is simply breathtaking. This is the problem with the Salafi movement, which has an inconsistent approach both to Aqidah and Fiqh. A person ultimately follows the opinion that best suits his whims under the disguise of the Quran and Sunnah. For over 40 years these people have been telling us to follow Quran and Sunnah and the Salaaf. When facts are pointed out to them that 1. Imam Abu Hanifah (Tabie) 2. Imam Malik (Taba Tabie) 3. Imam Shafee (Taba, Taba Tabie) 4. Imam Hanbal (Not from the Salaaf) Very Pious but not from the Salaaf Making unfounded claims Imam Abu Hanifah did not know hadith! The only thing you can rely on is the human Sanad, what was the moral character of your teacher and his teacher going all the way back to Prophet Muhammad (SAW). What the Salaafi fail to mention, is how they cannot validate the hadith book collection can you prove the hadith you today is the actual collection by the author of the collection. Secondly, Language and meaning change over time. Can you interpret the hadith today correctly while disregarding the interpretation of the scholars from the 1st and 2nd Islamic centuries? The likelihood Imam Mahdi will be a Salaafi is very small. According to the following hadith, he will not be pious until Allah corrects him overnight. Source: Sunan Ibn Mājah 4085 Grade: Sahih li ghayrihi (authentic due to external evidence) according to Al-Albani ‘Ali al-Qari said, “Allah will set right his affairs and raise his status in one night, or in a moment of one night, such that those invested with authority will agree upon his Caliphate.” So all the posturing by Salaafi is not helping the Ummah.
@@dcanebreezy5784 The fact, you equate seminary with Aqeeda school shows who the Jahl is. Let me explain it to you. Deobandi was a school set up by the Muslims in India after the defeat of Muslims by the British in 1866. For over 1000 years Muslims, either were Maturid, Ashari or Hanbali aqeeda, which you follow. When an Atheist asks you a question, can "Allah create a fire that he cannot put out". Your answer will be to go away Jahl. However, Maturidi and Ashari will have an answer. Surah Al-Baqarah - 258 Abraham said: Lo! Allah causeth the sun to rise in the East, so do thou cause it to come up from the West. Thus was the disbeliever abashed. And Allah guideth not wrongdoing folk.
Wouah i didn't know:) Listen, it's not about responding atheists It's a creedle issue about Allah swt. AShari & Matrudi took Ilm Al Kalam which is greek philosophy & applied it on Allah swt & interprted Texts with philosophical views not as Rassoul Allah, sahaba & tabeen nor 4 imams believed. You interpret Names & attributes of Allah swt, when Sahaba & rassoul Allah & The salaf did not. Listen, won't waste more time, you just remind me of Christians who used Philosophy on Allah swt We follow Sahaba who learned from Rassoul Allah. Period@@AbdulEssa-kp4vf
@@AbdulEssa-kp4vf Hanbali Aqeeda ? lol U mean Hanbali fiqh :) 4 imams Aqeeda is the Aqeeda of rassoul Allah. Dont't try to put philosophical Aqeeda with Sahaba's aqeeda & imams
@@dcanebreezy5784 Today there are many atheists amongst the Muslims in Pakistan Saudi Arabia and many Muslim countries around the world. The Salafi movement does not address the intellectual challenges posed by Agnostics and Atheists in the Muslim community. It was because of the threat of the Mu'tazilites, that these great Aqeeda scholars came. The fact you saying it is a waste of time tells me, you did very poorly in school and you have no GCSE to your name. You are the modern-day Bedouin roaming around most likely in Sparkhill.
This guy needs to stick to his dawah and comparative religion. He's not a scholar, he doesn't even have basic Arabic. His opening speech about divisions being caused by those who follow madhabs is very insincere; it is he who vigorously criticises certain Islamic schools such as that of Deoband to whom he has attributed multiple false statements/beliefs and when challenged about them simply goes into hiding and refuses to provide any evidence for his false claims. May Allah guide him or take away the platform that he has been given.
@@Durray13 Yes Uthman Farooq has indeed acted like a jahil... th-cam.com/video/U1YAqB91uMM/w-d-xo.html The fact that you take your Deen from him is truly astounding.
Dilliy hussein calling him shaykh and he can't read basic quran. My mum does not make major mistakes like him. He is making major mistakes in quran which is unacceptable. A shaykh can't read quran
@@Durray13 , it's not slander if it's true.. the videos of his poor arabic are available all other TH-cam.. It's not slander.. Guy is supposed to have a masters in hadith sciences.. It's a minimum requirement to be able to read and understand arabic. It would need to be a very crappy university that would allow someone who so badly struggles with arabic a masters in hadith sciences
The greatest cause of disunity amongst "Sunnis" broadly conceived is the Wahhabi doctrine of tripartite tawhid and their new-fangled conception of bid'ah.
There is nothing called Wahhabi Allah is The Wahhab. Muhammed ibn Abd Al Wahhab didn't bring anything new. If doing tawaf around graves & call to dead people is islam for you, i'd like to inform you this is not our religion (according to Quran & Sunnah) Period! Wahhabi doctrine ? can u teach me please about it ? Oh, you mean we need to follow the philosophy doctrine right ? of people who came 4 centuries after The prophet Sorry! Their new conception of Bidah ? have u read about Sahaba & 3 first generations, 4 imams & bukhari ..etc If u want to make a religion of your whimes & desires don't call urself Muslim. You seem to not learn from previous nations lol
wdym by you have your evidences & other side has theirs ? Is adopting Greek philosophy is what Rassoul Allah, Sahaba, Tabeen & four imams were on ? People of desires & innovation will never change.
@@dcanebreezy5784the day you can explain to me that you are not even 2% of the Muslim population and the rest are on the sunnah are wrong I will give you time to speak. Otherwise without knowledge, listening to a few speeches - do not talk.
Again, most lay muslims are not aware of deep creedle issue so you rubbish unstatistics are not real. do u know islam more than Sahaba ? Quboori@@mnuhs5
Even sufi in my country knows that Allah swt is above his creation on his throne. Do u know that old ashairah believed that too ? :) won't waste my time with 2% rubbish stats ignorant@@mnuhs5
@@mnuhs5dw the guy ur referring to is a clown. Hes probably the type person to claim all the Islamic golden age scholars as good even tho most of them were ashari or maturidi in aqeedah, and were mainly hanafi and then Maliki coming second 😂😂😂😂 such goofballs
59:43 but at the conference DH explicitly told him that it would’ve been nice if he had contacted him privately about these issues. So confused on who’s telling the truth here.
Does he know Arabic tho? Because he makes numerous mistakes that even a 2nd year student would pick up. He does good debate work, no doubt, but I question his qualifications
May Allah reward you brother Dilly for bringing the case of brother Daniel's "inqusition". That scene had really left a bitter taste at us,it was really unnecessary putting brother Daniel into that situation.
Don't think it was unnecessary at all. It was better. Only ones who feel bad are hard-core Daniel fanboys. He was brought on stage to clarify his own stance to us laymen. That's what it was - a clarification IN HIS OWN words but fanboys understood it to be a humiliation of Daniel. The last part of Daniel taking shahadah with a salafi touch was just added as a light hearted joke to calm down super salafis
@@wally86_sorry brother, I doubt that. Everyone could clearly see Br Daniel schooled the panel trying to question him. The 'Sheikhs' tried to put Deobandis under the bus, but they got schooled about that also.
Really enjoyed this podcast and learnt a lot. Going to stop criticising Muslim rulers as I agree it's not my place to say. Barakallahu Feekum to Shaykh Uthman, OMF, Dilly and the 5Pillars team.
My brother, I have been following you for years. I think that Sheikh Othman dealt with some of the problems that some young Muslims fall into in the West. I think that the political journalist Salman Al-Ansari will be the best guest after Sheikh Othman bin Al-Faruq to talk about politics in the Middle East and how Muslim rulers deal with imperial powers. In the Western world, and how the Arab peoples deal specifically with the rulers, and the position of the Arab peoples towards the Muslim Brotherhood, as well as the Turkish, Persian and Zionist ambitions in the Arab world, as well as the reasons for the emergence of Al Qaeda and ISIS in the Islamic world, and how we build an Islamic civilization that advances among the countries of the civilized world. It is possible to talk about issues such as the Palestinian, Libyan, Yemeni, Syrian and Iraqi issues, and how Muslim rulers deal with them according to the law of security and political interest. And what hinders Muslims from scientific, civilizational, and military progress, etc.? And our problems are with the donkeys of colonialism and with the slaves of the occupiers, and they are known to every scholar of politics. Likewise, the problem of Islamic countries with left-liberal extremism in Western media and politics Likewise, how do we confront the media demonizing Islam in all means of channels and social communication that are led by international channels in the Western world, and many countries of the world copy Western news in Japan, Korea, etc.. Sharing your views with journalist Salman Al-Ansari will clarify a lot of understanding of the political reality as it is, and not as we dream or want to do it.
There can never be unity with Salafis , in all their different colours from followers of al Albani, ibn Baz, al madkhali etc who all follow Quran and sunnah yet differ on many many masaail and are all on each others throats as well very negative towards all other Muslims who don’t agree with them . The speaker isn’t a specialist in Islamic knowledge , he’s good at defending Islam and in dawah so questions should have been restricted to such .
One of their ‘ great contributions’ they’ve taught the ummah is how to label each other non believers from their most extreme strands to innovators in their lighter strands to the point one will see a revert or a newly practicing Muslim who can’t even recite Quran properly using kufr and bidah regularly in their speech !
I’m sorry but his argument in regards to calling out rulers and being in the west and going to those countries is such a bogus argument. Their are scholars that have done this in for example Saudi, and we know what has happened to them. Yet these salafis don’t praise them for that they still have some excuse to accuse them of khuruj. And also there is a huge difference between advising rulers who have made mistakes and oppressive rulers who are killing and changing the religion and even opposing Islam.
Uthman ibn Farooq is affected too much by Harry Potter novels. The ruler/Voldermort who must never be mentioned by name...what nonsense is this. Also if he was a salafi, he would know that the salaf pretty much did revolutions every year against the Ummayad and Abbasid rulers. It was only later on with the Asharis that revolting against rulers became a taboo topic.
As a defending for the Ottomans (as a non Turk): The Ottoman khulafa were highly educated and had really good Islamic education. Not only them, but their whole administration. The ulama had a lot of power and could prevent the khalifa from decisions.
He’s a wahabi/salafi, they don’t recognize the khalifa of Osman Ghazi simply because he’s not Arab and because they fought wars against each other including ww1
Whaaaat?!!! How is he a sheikh? Observing what hes been spewing out at the beginning, this guy doesn't even understand what a madhhab is. Then he goes onto make a mistake in the hadeeth: من ترك الصلاة فقد كفر, he pronounces it as "man tarkussalah" and not 'man tarakassalah' 😂 that's just basic Arabic man! He needs to go back to basics - especially makharij. His pronunciation of names of books and words like 'madhaahib' 'madaaris' is OFF. He should stick to da'wah only. Teaching is not for him. Allahul musta'aan. Time to
Modi killing Kashmiris & when attacked Kashmir Modi got some sort of medal from a Muslim leader when he visited the Middle East just a couple of weeks later cant remember which country it was Qatar or another, completely disagree with this Sheikh about saying Muslims have to always have to follow these corrupt leaders
@Bro Dilly. I was shocked on your silence when Shaykh Uthman said Istegatha (via the Prophet S.A.W) is shirk. I was so surprised, you moderated the whole debate with Shaykh Asrar and Ustad AbderRahman. His calling millions of Muslims mushrik, tbh you should not have remained silent. This is dividing the ummah because ppl like them saying we are mushrik. I get it biddah is different, but mushrik , common that's like saying we are worse than Qadiyanni. Qadiyani are not doing shirk (but kufr) , but we are labelled as mushrik, which means we have no chance ever going jannah. I know your views on this, and you should never have remained silent, am so sadded by this
There is no Istighatha through any prophet or anything. Shirk Brother, it's shirk that doesn't mean you are a kaffir & u will go to jahanam but u have to repent & do it correctly. Pray to Allah swt he does accept it why would u make someone in the middle.. Qadiyani are kuffar out of the fold of islam. يقول الله -تبارك وتعالى: وَإِذَا سَأَلَكَ عِبَادِي عَنِّي فَإِنِّي قَرِيبٌ أُجِيبُ دَعْوَةَ الدَّاعِ إِذَا دَعَانِ فَلْيَسْتَجِيبُوا لِي وَلْيُؤْمِنُوا بِي لَعَلَّهُمْ يَرْشُدُونَ [سورة البقرة:186].
May Allah Reward Sheikh Uthman, Brother Dilly & all at 5 Pillars Is there a Hadith which says, IF RIBA BECOMES WIDE SPREAD IN MUSLIM LANDS ….It becomes COMPULSORY FOR EVERY MUSLIM MAN AND WOMAN MUST PERFORM JIHAD Until it is Removed…? Barak Allah o Fiqom…
Asim He keeps on saying he wants unity that's why he mentions the other schools. But sadly when he came for his last tour he created so much fitnah over Aqeedah Ashari Maturidi. He made an announcement before he even came which I don't see how that is beneficial for the muslim. His good at his dawah..but I would not want him to deliver a khutbah or be an Imām as he does create division. Even one of the Salafi Imams had to tell him in green lane masjid to calm down with taking the mick of other Muslim groups not to add the conversation between Daniel...
I'm very interested to hear Ust Nouman discuss music with Syekh Usthman. I'm often confused abt it's haram or halal status. Where I am, nasyid is common. Or songs with religious lyrics are super popular and played on the radio or TV all the time. And nasyid groups performed them in special events. If it's haram, why is it not condemned? 🤔
MashaAllah very good and conscience explanation to all the questions brother dilly posed may Allah bless ustad Uthman Ibn Farooq. We need well educated and well spoken knowledgeable people giving dawah. People who give dawah please stop dividing the ummah and start explaining your points with wisdom and knowledge without the pantomime and theatrics its getting unbearable now.
The greater harm can often come from staying silent and letting the ruler secularise entire nations, rather than speaking up and criticising. This is why we have the crisis we have today. You have to look at the long-term picture on a case-by-case basis, rather than having a blanket rule “never criticise the ruler”.
@@AdamAliAden In many cases it can (and has) put pressure on the ruler, from inside and from outside, to make changes or not go too far. Wise rulers will pay attention to what others are saying, in order not to lose control. Muslim rulers are no different.
@@MAli99923 The hadith says IF one intends to advise a ruler, do so privately. But most criticism of rulers nowadays is to inform the public of the ruler's actions (for example, collaboration with Israel) rather than to advise the ruler. Secondly, the reason generally given to keep quiet in the ahadeeth is the greater harm to Muslims if they rebel or disobey. I am pointing out that in SOME cases at least, the greater harm can come from keeping quiet and letting the ruler do whatever he wants.
@@imranqqq7307 And when the fitnah (trial, discord) occurred in the time of ʿUthmān, some people said to Usāmah bin Zayd , ‘Will you not speak to ʿUthmān?’ So he said, ‘Do you think that I have not spoken to him, just because you have not heard it from me? Verily I will speak to him concerning what is between him and me, without opening an affair which I would not like to be the first to open.’ [An authentic narration: Related by Ahmad (3/403) and Ibn Abī ʿĀsim (2/521) So when they (the Khārijites) opened it, evil took place in the time of ʿUthmān . They opposed ʿUthmān openly, thus completing the tribulations, fighting and corruption, which has not ceased to affect the people to this day, was brought about. And this caused the tribulation to occur between ʿAlī and Muʿāwiyah, and ʿUthmān was killed for these reasons …
Not knowing Imam Abu Hanifa's actual name isn't a negative haha I think the bigger issue is he wasn't raised in an Islamic household, which often leads people to become wahabi or wahabi styled as those groups did admirable work in disenfranchised youth. But the problem is, so much of their work is also problematic and this can be viewed in a number of Farooqs statements.
Barelvis believe that one cannot pray behind those who have diffrent manhaj and deem them as disbelievers. And you have the guts to talk about Sheikh Abdulwahab.
Correct me if i’m wrong but Uthman is leaning towards wahabis even if he says it’s ok to follow madhabs because they sugarcoat nowadays and Salahaddin alayubi رحمه الله was a ash’ary and majority of the muslims were ash’aris and maturidis after the first 3 decades. and btw Ibn kathir رحمه الله mentioned this in his tafsir that someone went to the prophet ﷺ grave and made du’a ( clarification about tawassul and istighatha - we know and believe that Allah gives and takes like sustenance and children and forgiveness for our sins ) but sheikh ibn taymya had different views and said it’s not allowed and he was kinda alone there but Muhammad bin abdulwahab went to extremes and i wanted this to be talked about. And saudi arabia isn’t ruling by the Quran but those madkhali wahabis give fatwas to follow the rulers even though clearly they’re not following the Quran and I believe muslims should be smart like Sheikh Asrar Rashid said on 103 podcast .
Oh no! What about all those 100s who could do so and criticised/ disagreed with the view of the hanafis on many positions (like eating seafood besides fish)?
@@abyrahman6610 Stick to 1 thing lol. First u already mention something I said in my comment, now when I've showed u how u missed that, u say I missed something. If ur point is hanafi position on an issue is the correct one, then no. Many of the hanafi positions have been against what the other 3 madahib believed in. But if u say he isn't qualified to judge hanafi ulema, then we can look into his qualifications to determine that
The forked tongue on this guy... He completely dodges the issue of Saudi jailing scholars. Scholars who did not even criticise the rulers but criticised things like cinemas.
The only fork tongue guy is you ... are you going to go ssj and free them? Or are you just cariji... the point is they lead security even if they wrong, and non Muslims want curuj to replace always...
Do u know how to criticize Rulers ? even tho i 'm not fan of these rulers Do u know how to criticize according to Sunnha ? or just throwing claims? or maybe a khariji O.o Did Arab springs offered Muslims any good thing except Destruction, secularism & atheism.
2:24 - Do you follow a madhab?
10:13 - What is the ruling on those that miss Salah ?
15:16 - Is the Niqab fardh?
21:28 - is Smoking haram?
23:35 - Is all seafood permissible?
25:43 - Is eating from McDonald's halal in the west?
32:16 - Fiqh of Divorce (3x talaq)
35:46 - Can we give salam to non-Muslims ?
36:35 - Do Salafis have respect for Madhabs?
40:33 - Would you give dawah or a talk in a Non-Salafi masjid?
45:59 - Can there be brotherhood with those that practice Istighstha or Mawlid etc ?
49:36 - Can there ever be unity with those who have a different Aqidah?
57:37 - His confrontation with Daniel Haqiqatjou last year.
1:04:53 - Can we unite behind a khalif with a different Aqidah ?
1:10:41 - issue of obeying the ruler
1:16:18 - Can you criticise the ruler ?
1:27:25 - Did you really get stabbed ?
Please pin this
@@imaadindoronly blood brothers admin can do that, im just a viewer
JazakAllah khair 🙌🙌
Jazak Allah Khairan
Remember the path or manhajj the prophet of Islam left for the ummah are the TWO WEIGHTY MATTERS the Qur'an and Ahlulbayt
Known is hadith Thaqalayn
Thank you
Shaykh does good work defending Islam against the enemies of Islam, the muslim community appreciates this and hopes shaykh Uthman carries on with his work against the enemies of Islam
But makes a grave mistake honouring leaders/ figures in the salafi community
@@jeje4042why?
@@jeje4042 nothing wrong with that
He isn't a sheikh/scholar
@@abdullahassaffah he says in the video he is not I said it out of respect
As salaamu alaykum brothers, sisters, friends and foes.
Please like, share and comment on this video, as well as subscribing to the 5Pillars TH-cam channel!
Jazakallah khayran.
Why allow this lying jaahil lie on Aimma of Islam?
And when the fitnah (trial, discord) occurred in the time of ʿUthmān, some people said to Usāmah bin Zayd , ‘Will you not speak to ʿUthmān?’ So he said, ‘Do you think that I have not spoken to him, just because you have not heard it from me? Verily I will speak to him concerning what is between him and me, without opening an affair which I would not like to be the first to open.’ [An authentic narration: Related by Ahmad (3/403) and Ibn Abī ʿĀsim (2/521)
So when they (the Khārijites) opened it, evil took place in the time of ʿUthmān . They opposed ʿUthmān openly, thus completing the tribulations, fighting and corruption, which has not ceased to affect the people to this day, was brought about. And this caused the tribulation to occur between ʿAlī and Muʿāwiyah, and ʿUthmān was killed for these reasons …
و عليك السلام و رحمة الله و بركاته
Great Podcast & a well respected & well knowledgeable guest. May Allah swt guide us on the path of the Sahabah & we follow the Quran & Sunnah….. Ameen
Ameen❤
Remember brother, the prophet of Islam left TWO weighty matters the Qur'an and ahlulbayt for source of guidance after him
Not the sahaabah.
Pls check N Investigate
Fear Allah YA KADDAB! Allah PRAISED the sahabah. U rafidhi kaddab. We love the Ahlul Bayt, u are an evil liar.
It is the mainly Salafi movement that have caused significant division's in the UK. No hanafi has ever gone to a Shafi and telling them they are deviant and need to follow 'quran & sunnah'. They have casues mass confusion and fitna amkngst the youth from the 1990's in the Uk.
I don’t think that’s true at all. No salafi goes around calling followers of the madahib deviants.. the only people they call deviants when applies to aqeedah which is a whole different topic.
@@aklimurraza2626 Sorry brother but you must be living under a rock if you think that is the case. I reside in Birmingham and since the the late 80's , we had literally salafis, almost militant into thier approach in our areas going around speaking to the youth telling them ridiculous things like imam Abu Hanifa only knew 40 hadiths ! Stating they are not following quran and sunnah. I have seen and experienced this personally so please stop with the nonsense
@@shaikhimi6458they still do it
@@shaikhimi6458
Some so called hanafis said a Shafii man can't marry a hanafi sister... like what?
@@ragayseven2260
4 mathhabs are Athari in Aqida & salafi in fiq... what's Numan's mom's mathhab? what is difference in Usul of 4 mathhab in fiq?
Imam Ahmad made tabdi on kulabis who taught Mid life Hasan Ashari before he repented to Athari, proof he wrote Usul Dayana affirmed by Asakir, Dhahabi & I think Bayhaqi.
MashaAllah love this shaykh. Came to my local masjid on his tour to the UK and hugged him. And like him, I work in the science field too
The quality of this is a pure diamond بارك الله فيكم اخوتنا
Allahumma baarik. Alhamdullah, Ya Allah. Many many so many syubhat that I have, Alhamdulillah with Allah's will, I come across this video and NOW, Alhamdulillah It make absolutely sense. It clear up of all my syubhat that I had
Jazakallahu khayran sheikh Uthman, May Allah grant you jannah.
-
"May Allah unite us upon Quran, Sunnah and the way of salafulummah"
(like sheikh Uthman said in closing of this video) ❤
-
Sheikh uthman, you’re a good role model for the Muslims because you put in the work for Allah SWT, see how Allah has elevated you and made you loved worldwide, may Allah increase you in strength and guidance!
I want to see examples of Muslims critisizing rulers from the west that resulted in bloodshed in Muslim Countries.
They are just fear mongering, it was just a dumb argument.
They don’t have the guts bro unfortunately.. scared they’ll be called terrorists. What a joke
Have you ever heard about the Arab Spring and how it was influenced by the Arab diaspora (mainly) on social media like Facebook or Reddit? Or were you too busy painting the walls of your cave?
@@human0_0skull must have been in that cave you’re talking about
@@human0_0skull akhi speak respectfully and show good manners, your meant to love me for the sake of Allah. The Arabs in those nations used social medias themselves to organise and take part in the Arab Spring.
In Egypt, Tunisia there wasn't bloodshed, Libya has conspiracy theories surrounding it.
Masha Allah, very good interview. Thanks for clarifying on Daniel’s discussion, I have great respect now for YQ and Sheikh Uthman the both of them from different positions show sincere intentions to unite the Ummah. Ya Rabb, grant us Aafia 🤲🏾
Umm did you not hear the part where he mentioned sheikh Karim Abuzaid’s refutation on Yasir Qadhi? I think you should go watch that akhi May Allah bless you
@@longegg-wind9577 , Karim abuzaid is another boot licker.
I’m still unclear on that cuz at the event DH clearly told him that he would’ve preferred to be contacted privately on those questions. One of them must be lying.
@@ahmedyamani7388
Brother don’t accuse fellow Muslim brothers of potentially lying. There was some sort of misunderstanding and we should move on. Don’t let it distract us.
@@sammu Brother both of them have been exposed lying at different times. This is nothing new, so me claiming that one of them has to have lied here is not a stretch giving the contradictions displayed.
Also everyone must be held to account, esp brothers with big platforms. We can’t just dismiss and sweep everything under the carpet.
alhamdulillah i met this sheikh during one of his trips to mosque in scotland, asked about criticising of the saudi rulers. He had a good reply
What did he say?
@@AB-xx7hy And when the fitnah (trial, discord) occurred in the time of ʿUthmān, some people said to Usāmah bin Zayd , ‘Will you not speak to ʿUthmān?’ So he said, ‘Do you think that I have not spoken to him, just because you have not heard it from me? Verily I will speak to him concerning what is between him and me, without opening an affair which I would not like to be the first to open.’ [An authentic narration: Related by Ahmad (3/403) and Ibn Abī ʿĀsim (2/521)
So when they (the Khārijites) opened it, evil took place in the time of ʿUthmān . They opposed ʿUthmān openly, thus completing the tribulations, fighting and corruption, which has not ceased to affect the people to this day, was brought about. And this caused the tribulation to occur between ʿAlī and Muʿāwiyah, and ʿUthmān was killed for these reasons …
Bro don't leave us hanging like that 😂
The saudi rulers are the perfect role model ,how a hypocrite should be.all these scholars are just saudi bootlickers
On the issue of rebelling against rulers, I can respect the fact the shaykh did not blanketly deny its permissibility, like so many of these madkhalis, however he didn't make it clear what the conditions of rebellion and also criticism of rulers are. If this is something he studied in fiqh then it should be relatively easy to give an overview in this podcast, we will see if he does it in a second podcast...
Bro as always, such issues usually lie between the 2 extremes. I haven't seen that part yet where the sheikh said this, but my gut feel says on this matter the truth is somewhere in between what madkhalis and what Haqiqatjou and his gang say.
Sheikh ibn uthaymeen actually said it was permissible but mentioned clear conditions. Its on the masjid dar us sunnah channel. A VERY CLEAR, PRECISE video mentioning 4-5 conditions
Ka’b ibn ‘Ujrah reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “Verily, rulers will come after me and whoever enters their audience, affirms their lies, and supports their oppression, they are not part of me and I am not part of them. They will have no presence at the Fountain. Whoever does not enter their audience, does not support their oppression, and does not affirm their lies, he is part of me and I am part of him. He will be present at the Fountain.”
Source: Sunan al-Tirmidhī 2190
Grade: Sahih (authentic)
@shoIslam - why is your name show Islam? Do you advice ppl to be open with Islam. If do good but be accurate in speech.
Also you error on so called Madkhalis, they say you can rebel but has conditions... too
Do you not see what happened to the muslim countries recently that revolt the leader? Now they are dead, and the same people who revolt want them back. Crying because the life was better.
@@amdol the problem is they understood the problem but not the cure. They needed to replace the leadership with an Islamic caliphate and not another secular democratic regime.
Masha Allah, may Allah preserve brother Uthman. Very beneficial talk.
5pillars didn’t do justice in this podcast. Uthman Farooq challenged the thoughts of deobandis again and is refusing to sit with deobandis yet claims to be willing to sit with them. To question the aqeedah of great scholars isn’t a light matter and needs to be challenged. Talk about unity is cheap when you don’t back it up
He is unfortunately like most wahabi/salafi/najdis T_T. May Allah unite us all. Ameen.
Deobandis do have a very little part that is no way related to Islam, I can vouch for it being a south Indian Muslim and living in a community encircled with people from nizamuddin markaz. The book they read is so called fazaile aamal contains lot more made up stories than discussing about sahee hadiths. May Allah protect and guide us all.. Aameen
@@alsalman007tube 😂 stop. Go read insha allah
@@khairt1731 jahil spotted 🚨
He said there are many different kinds of Deobandis and he didn't generalize. Didn't you listen to the podcast?
Very informative podcast brother. Learnt a lot
Usman said don’t criticize the ruler publicly from 1:17 only privately again this is also been debunked by bro Hajji of how the salaf criticized the ruler publicly not privately
What Bro Hajji said was debunked too. Bro Hajji doesn't know
You're openly quoting a Khariji? Subhanallah, fear Allah.
Bro Hajji is a Deobandi
His whole existence revolves around fighting Madkhalis.
And when the fitnah (trial, discord) occurred in the time of ʿUthmān, some people said to Usāmah bin Zayd , ‘Will you not speak to ʿUthmān?’ So he said, ‘Do you think that I have not spoken to him, just because you have not heard it from me? Verily I will speak to him concerning what is between him and me, without opening an affair which I would not like to be the first to open.’ [An authentic narration: Related by Ahmad (3/403) and Ibn Abī ʿĀsim (2/521)
So when they (the Khārijites) opened it, evil took place in the time of ʿUthmān . They opposed ʿUthmān openly, thus completing the tribulations, fighting and corruption, which has not ceased to affect the people to this day, was brought about. And this caused the tribulation to occur between ʿAlī and Muʿāwiyah, and ʿUthmān was killed for these reasons …
Salaafi Aqeedah is you cannot criticise MBS. You can criticise rulers like Morsi who have some ghayrah for the Deen.
1:26:39
The answer of the sheikh is very very dangerous. Accusing Ulamaa who are imprisoned is NOT ok!
Hasbounallahou wa ni’mal wakeel.
And accusing all activists is NOT ok neither!
Where are your HUJJAJ of these imprisoned people in the muslim world that they have taken the g&uns on the streets ???
Are you talking about Salman owdah
I know Shaykh Uthman personally and he is one of the most amazing, humble, caring people on Earth. One of my favorite human beings and teachers.
Masha’Allaah shaykh uthman dealt with the questions. You can’t be concerned that the rulers of Muslim countries are kaffir but your living under a kafir ruler in the UK 😂 🇬🇧
MashAllah Barakallah, may Allah swt bless this ummah and the people striving for goodness and the pleasure of Allah swt
Man, season 3 is off to an amazing start
Ya know that bro!!!,
Sheikh I am a Maldivian , love this podcast, n if you want to know if you want to a maldivian you have to be a muslim as far as I know n the country by law is an Islamic country. Hope you vist there soon😊
May Allah preserve shaykh uthmaan
Ameen.
The problem are the Madkhalis and many false Muslim rulers, do you not get that?
the problem is arrogance coupled with ignorance towards the Quran and sunnah.
@@muslimresponse103How do you feel about MBS buying a picture of Isa (AS) for millions? Also making the adhaan lowered and opening clubs?
@@Figleaf-Bicarbonatehow do you feel about your own sins and disregarding the Quran and sunnah to follow your own emotions and feelings?!
@@Figleaf-Bicarbonate MBS is not infallible nor should he be judged with such a standard. First of all you don't know his intentions, it could be to purchase it so that it isn't on public display, seeing as the painting was supposed to be shown at a gallery in Abu Dhabi in 2018 but since MBS purchased it, nobody has laid eyes upon it to the public's knowledge since 2017.
Making the volume of adhaan was in response to complaints from citizens, so your qualm on that issue is with the residents, not the one acting on ther complaints, and lowering the max volume affects someone's deen how? Does it go in the Qur'aan and Sunnaah to lower the volume of the adhaan? Aren't we supposed to be a considerate people? If everyone recited at the top of their lungs during salah nobody in the masjid would be able to concentrate.
The clubs opening, I can only find news on a club opening in Jeddah in 2019, which the GEA of SA stated they did not authorise, but rather the organisers took advantage of a license granted for a different event altogether to open the club. So everything is not as it seems. Either way, it should be removed but again, that shouldn't effect your ability to practise your religion and be the best Muslim you can be.
BaarakAllaahu feekum.
@@Figleaf-BicarbonateHow about you worried about your sister, your mom and dad at home. Why do you stretch your hand where it doesn’t reach?🤷🏽♂️ Does knowing him bought the picture increases your eman?? How about you leave things that concern you and focus on things that concern you.
Just know that I love you for the sake of Allah.❤️❤️
Not ruling by the laws of Allah is considered Major Kufr according to many Scholars, so it’s not a condition that one expresses their disbelief verbally, also the view that we don’t live in those lands and therefore we shouldn’t comment on their affairs is incorrect since we are one Ummah and what happens around the World concerns us and affects Muslims in different ways both economically and politically, but he’s correct in that the right procedure should be followed in addressing the matter, unfortunately what we see in the Muslim lands is sad from both the ruling governments and the people.
My scholar, ibn Abbas رضي الله عنه said it is Kufr less than Kufr (I.e. minor kufr.).
Ka’b ibn ‘Ujrah reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “Verily, rulers will come after me and whoever enters their audience, affirms their lies, and supports their oppression, they are not part of me and I am not part of them. They will have no presence at the Fountain. Whoever does not enter their audience, does not support their oppression, and does not affirm their lies, he is part of me and I am part of him. He will be present at the Fountain.”
Source: Sunan al-Tirmidhī 2190
Grade: Sahih (authentic) according
Do you, your acquaintances, and the generality of myslim laymen rule by what Allah has ordered in your own homes these days?.. Hmm, yet here we are NOT making takfir on Muslims based on that. The rulers are a reflection of our own inner state as muslims. You want umar in charge act like those under umar at his time. We can complain all day, but NOTHING will change until we take accountability and apply the shari'ah to ourselves. There is no denying that there's corruption in land, but who is it to blame really? We've turned away from the shari'ah and we act like it isnt our fault.
@@pursueexcellence7737 that saying is well known from ibn Abbas (RA) but it’s context doesn’t apply to the one who makes laws to govern and judge the people in the land, what you are quoting is to do with judging in a matter away from the shariah, ie, not applying the command of Allah in a particular matter or so, not in cases where the actual laws are codified and are contrary to that of the shariah, this distinction is well known,
@@getout0101 Who before you preceded in this (wishy-washy) distinction of the difference between it being kufr Akbar and As-ghar being "judging in the land" and "judging in a particular matter"?
Because there are over 30 salaf who have reported ijmaa' that a father not ruling by the ruling of Allah by allowing his child to have a girlfriend is commiting major kufr when he believes Allah has not made it haram, otherwise, it is only a sin.
Mashallah a very calm and uniting discussion.
Just what we needed after the last Talk with Daniel Haqiqatjou didn't go well.
Which talk
Daniels has made a video as it seems like Uthman bin farooq is lying yet again.
th-cam.com/video/8mTshPbfKzw/w-d-xo.html
@@MisterSolitudeth-cam.com/video/JUK_SRnRV7A/w-d-xo.htmlsi=4CHylinc62OZUXbP
Very dissapointed in Uthman ibn Farooq. He turns out to be on the Madkhali manhaj. If I was there I would have asked him some hard questions where I am sure I wouldnt have gotten a straight answer. First question: If disobeying the rules makes on a Khawarij then tell me, what is Ibn Saud, who overthrew the Sharif of Makkah in a violent coup with the help of the British? Second question: He considers modern national state rulers as muslims. Tell me, if they dont apply the Sharia then does that make them Taghut? And if they are Taghut, then they cannot be muslims and we must not obey them. Third question: National state goes against the nature of Islam, which is all about destroying falsehood and uniting the people under ONE imam. How can Sh. Uthman be in favor of national state rulers, if it goes directly against Islam?
Your questions are loaded with baseless assumptions and a clear agenda to create corruption, sitting in your home while calling for civil war and rebellion. The methodology of Iblees, the way of those dogs of the Hellfire.
@hamzanocap maybe you never went to school but valid criticism is important way to challenge a disputed claim and see if it holds up to the truth. Criticism does not cause "rebellion". Absurd ideological nonesense that's fed to you by state sponsored "scholarship"
Sitting in our home swith our critical faculties in check and the ability to criticise non muslim goverments we live under and question them for opression, and also the Muslim ones. No double standard like the confused lot.
FYI salafis have criticised foreign rulers themselves and ibn baz even called saddam a kafir, so it's a weird double standard pushed to preserve the power of the gulf despots
The differences between Rabee al Madkhali and other salafi scholars are political. They share sam fiqh and aqeedah even though each scholar contradicts themself many times. Wahabbism was created for political control and sabotage of the ummah. The madkhalis are just another wave of this sect.
He answered the questions about the rulers and rebellion with evidence from the quran and sunnah. The deen is based on quran and sunnah, not your emotions.
@usmanchaudhary1765 he didn't really. He offered the same tired replies. Not once did he refer to Quran and Sunnah when he spoke about why we can't criticise foreign leaders. Like why can't a Muslim in UK criticise the horrible actions of mbs?
His rationale of why they shouldn't is absurd and based on his assertion that doing so harms the youth in the country. Such a viewpoint is absurd as it tries to make criticism of a foreign stranger the reason a youth or his family is persecuted, instead of the OBVIOUS elephant in the room; the tyranny of the ruler. His view point is essentially saying the random criticism is causing harm not tyranny and opression of the one being criticised. He didn't refer to textual evidence for his argument, rather his person reasons.
Mashaallah my respect for sheikh uthman gets bigger every time i watch him
I appreciate Sheikh Uthman and his desire to bring the ummah together. That being said, I find something very wrong with his stance on criticizing rulers. He switched back and forth between Khalifa and ruler. Then when he said "why don't you go to those countries and say the same thing" and the brother responded "well they will arrest and kill me", the sheikh responded "exactly". So we are just supposed to be completely silent (as the oppressors want) while they arrest and torture our scholars? While they sell out to the west? As they work with foreign intelligence agencies against the Muslims? As they destabilize other countries, installing and propping up more oppressors? Changing the school curriculum to pervert the masses? Introducing fitnah where it didnt exist before? All while inviting foreign soldiers to establish themselves on your land? If the argument is that blood will be shed, my response is that blood has already been shed and is being shed. I'm not saying that the people in any specific country should just get up and start fighting the government, but calling it out seems like a reasonable first step.
And when the fitnah (trial, discord) occurred in the time of ʿUthmān, some people said to Usāmah bin Zayd , ‘Will you not speak to ʿUthmān?’ So he said, ‘Do you think that I have not spoken to him, just because you have not heard it from me? Verily I will speak to him concerning what is between him and me, without opening an affair which I would not like to be the first to open.’ [An authentic narration: Related by Ahmad (3/403) and Ibn Abī ʿĀsim (2/521)
So when they (the Khārijites) opened it, evil took place in the time of ʿUthmān . They opposed ʿUthmān openly, thus completing the tribulations, fighting and corruption, which has not ceased to affect the people to this day, was brought about. And this caused the tribulation to occur between ʿAlī and Muʿāwiyah, and ʿUthmān was killed for these reasons …
@pvcrma1 I understand, but what is the solution? Do we sit back and stay quiet while the ummah deteriorates? Our children continue being brainwashed in schools? Countries being destabilized? I'm not suggesting armed conflict. I'm not even claiming to have an answer, but is saying that allowing Halloween celebrations in the Arabian peninsula haram too far? Is saying that the rulers allowing clubs and bars in the land of the sahaba are wrong for doing so, being a khariji? Is speaking out against arresting, torturing, and executing scholars equivalent to calling for violence? I don't think so. Sitting silent and hoping for the best doesn't seem like an intelligent solution. If the people there know it but are unable to speak because of a direct threat of arrest or death, the rest of us have to be silent? If you run your country in such a way, armed rebellion is a NATURAL result. This is a rule that has been seen time and time again in history. Muslim lands or not.
@@Melhimri The solutions are many:
- 01. Learn Aqeedah
- 02. Return to the Sunnah
- 03. Repentance
- 04. Go back to the way of companions
- 05. Change our condition [13.11]
Let us be realistic. The masaajid are practically empty and the potential of the Muslims are only seen on Fridays/Ramadaan/Eed etc.
We want victory whilst we are far away from the deen of Allaah! Does that even make sense?
@pvcrma1 that all sounds nice and I'm not discounting it. But, again, our scholars are being locked up. The scholars being promoted by the government are teaching government sponsored Islam. The companions challenged the oppressive rulers on many (and I mean MANY occasions). Many of our most famous scholars were arrested and tortured for publicly disagreeing with leaders.
Let me just summarize the situation. The leaders are pushing the population into more and more western ways: introducing clubs, concerts, gambling, bars, mixed events, etc. They are also jailing, torturing, and killing anyone who criticizes them. Then you have a group of people who are saying criticizing them is haram and you are a khariji if you do it. The way of Islam is not to just sit at home and pray. It's قول و عمل. You speak and take action. The Prophet (pbuh) praised speaking a word of truth to a tyrant. If we just sit at home and pray (which was not the way of the Prophets or the companions), and forget about enjoining good and forbidding evil, you are just as blameworthy as the leader. Recall the hadith when Allah was going to destroy a city and the angels said there was a faithful man amongst them. Allah called for his destruction first. Go read about the sahaba and how they openly criticized Hajjaj ibn Yusuf on multiple occasions.
@@MAli99923jazakAllahu khairan for your concise answer. We often forget that to change a situation, we must change ourselves. Speaking out against rulers will change nothing, the best is to focus on yourself and leave the rest to Allah (سُبْحَانَهُ وَ تَعَالَى)
Try getting a proper Hanabli scholar on, that would be better and beneficial.
Hanbali scholar not the Wahhabis
jahil spotted 🚨 @khairt1731
Well he should try and get you instead...so that we will see what you have
I'm not hanbali I'm shafii asharii. So I love hanbali and their schoolers. Not the khashawia(خشوية) like ibn taymiyya, Abdullah ibn abdulwahhab, ibn favzan, etc.
@@emreyldrim so put in taymiyyah,ibn Kathir,imamul mizzi,ibnl qayyim,imamu thahabi put the in hell fire then and call them names since they don't subscribe ur own understanding of the religion
Wallahi, Shaykh Uthman does some really good work and is really the Lion of the Ummah in the West.
I find it amazing how Salaafi constantly mispresent history.
1. For the last 40 years, the pseudo-Salafi movement characterized people who followed Madhab as followers of Bidah and people who rejected clear Quran verses and Hadith. When the person following the madhab was not in a position to judge himself, then became reliant on the interpretation of the Quran and Hadith of the Salafi scholar. Who rejected 1400 years of scholarship. A madhab is a methodology on how to interpret the Quran and Hadith, basically having a consistent approach.
2. Also how do they equate scholars directly with Prophet Muhammad (SAW), are you going to follow the scholar or Prophet Muhammad (SAW), you innovator?
3. Also they constantly fail to mention that Imam Abu Hanifah, and Imam Malik are part of the Salaaf!!
Imam Abu Hanifah, was Tabiee
Imam Malik was Tabiee
Imam Shafee was Tab Tabiee
Also, both were contemporaries, i.e Imam Abu Hanifah fled from Kufa to Makkah and would meet Imam Malik in Makkah when he came for Haj. Also how Imam Abu Hanifah sent his students to learn from Imam Malik!
Imam Shafee was a student of Imam Malik! Also, Imam Hanbali was a student of Imam Shafee.
Also how Imam Hanbali stood up against the Mu'tazila.
Also how the Salaafi movement glossed over the attack of Kaba and the killing of Hajis in 1979. By students of Sheikh Abd al-Aziz Ibn Baz, the great recent Salaafi scholar.
The same scholar who gave a fatwa permitting the US troops to be stationed in Saudi Arabia Hejaz.
Well said
in 1979 it was the shia persians who attacked in hajj, there had to be a fatwa made to stop thw rioters since the rioters already killed many hujjaj and police officers. u said salafi reject history while ur here misrepresnting history and misleading the ummah as if "The students of ibn baz" started killing randomly. May Allah give you what u deserve.
We can forgive a brother especially like shaykh bin Baz rahimullah..his esteem in the DEEN should be overlook
Al-hamdulillah. Amazing guest you have here.
Very problematic answers when he used the Hanbali Madhab as they weren’t based on the mu’tamad of the Madhab . The mu’tamad of the Madhab is that leaving salah totally out of laziness is only kufr when the person has is called by the leader , asked to make tawbah , one salah finishes and second one too, repeated etc and even when these conditions drop then they follow the majority as no one can apply these rules except the leader or his substitute not lay people coming on TH-cam channels or people with their families !!
And that masalah ( along with dozens of others ) show the difference between the hanbali and salafi madhabs
Tawassul is allowed via the rasool صلى الله عليه وسلم is sunnah in the Hanbali Madhab
Smoking is makrooh with many of the Hanbali Madhab .
He also talks about the strongest view according to himself as if he has reached the level independent jurist which he most certainly hasn’t ( the conditions are very stringent and mentioned in books of usool )
Please don’t conflate the Hanbali and Salafi Madhab , they are TOTALLY separate
Give me evidence that smoking is makrook within the hanbali madhab. Don’t speak about matter of deen without knowledge before people get misled. What if someone smokes because he has seen your comment? All ulema agree that smoking is haram the hanbalis included
@@alameenameen8871 I’m not going to discuss complex Fiqhi masaail with someone I don’t even know … we can say the masalah is a masalah khilaafiiyyah and it’s definitely something better to avoid and can become haram to external reasonings.
@@MK-kz6jn its not a issue of khilaf it was back then in the 80s,90s when ulema didn’t know the harm of smoking. Today we know smoking kills and allah says dont kill yourself. Today there is no khilaf amongst the ulema ,maybe amongst liberal so called imams that have no concern for the shariah of allah.
Anyway may allah guide is allah. And protect us from haram
You are so ignorant bro Salafi is not an madhab is a manhaj is our manhaj and the only true path, under that you have the 4 madhab there are like a tools to practice Islam,
Masha Allah fantastic interview. Full of very very important information regarding the situation of the ummah. She is very learned but also very humble. Great man
People in comments are jokes, judging the dude on anything and everything, you guys should focus on your own lives and if its that important to you maybe you should go put in the work like these dudes and then get on a podcast and say what you gotta say. go fix yourselves. Bunch of scholars in the comments .
💯
I know right. No one is infallible at the end of the day. Shiekh Uthman says he is a student of knowledge at the end of the day. Arrogance has just increased with the internet and keyboard warriors. No one actually is humble enough to sit down with a scholar and learn from them. Anyone taking knowledge for the sake of Allah become more humble, any other motives and they became arrogant.
Ma shaa Allah, may Allah bless both of you, one of the most intellectual podcast I have watched, love and respect.
This was the loveliest and the most awaited discussion for me. My beloved Shaykh Uthman wearing cool 😎 1:34:00
I ask Allah to preserve him and reward him immensely for his knowledge and his works and his tireless efforts day in day out. Love you for the sake of Allah, Shaykh ❤
Furthermore, beloved brother Dilly Hussain - I almost forgot - may Allah reward you for being neutral and impartial yet again for hosting this discussion. As you did in the past between Shaykh Israr and Shaykh Abdurrahman.
Some people are good at being neutral? 😂
Masha Allah, may Allah bless and guide you both.
In all respect... He's incorrect...imam Maliks usool is that he would give preferrence to Amal ahle madinah over a saheeh hadeeth that has singular narration . Also this was not the dawah of the 90s and early 2000... The salafis would denounce following Madhab completely ...some of the super salafis as they were known back then would call Umar a biddati...Inna lillahi...for the ijtihad of 20 rakas
@@043ash i dunno brother
Subhan'Allah you will never find A true Muslim speak ill of his Muslim brother in public, no matter what happens, not to revile him or insult him. And if he finds a mistake or false information from him in the deen , then he corrects the matter without mentioning his name.... This is the path of our Prophet Muhammad peace be upon him, the companions,and the our salaf .. Now you find many who claim to be a Salafi while They even don't know what his Muslim brother right upon him !! backbites and hurts his Muslim brother, making a whole videos about only to convince ppl to get rid of him! Almost making him a kaifer!! Acting like they have good attantion! When they do nothing but fitnah and divided the ummah, they Only use the word Salafi to justify what they doing! May Allah deal them all.
ameen. unfortunately this is what we see today, bashing each other on a super public platform, these are serving themselves not Allah
making public amr bilma3ruh nahi 3an al-munkar is permissible and was done by the salaf
"When Muslims will curse each other in public" This is one of the signs before day of judgment that will invite Allah's anger and lead to the destruction of the muslims.
Your correct brother. The people of Iman control their anger and refrain from such backbiting/slandering of their Muslim brethren. Alhamdulillah, Salafists only makeup less than 2 percent of the Ummah, but they are platformed online and have incredible amounts of money at their disposal. I fear for the Ummah
@@AB-xi9im be exactly like a salaf, then go out and expose your brother. you cannot even pray like the salaf, fast like the salaf and you want to publicly criticize like the salaf, possibly this is what lead syrians to the complete disintegration of their nationm you still didn't learn from other's mistakes and you want badly to reproduce their same mistakes, walahi ajaeeb
@@HumbleServantofAllah642 what is this gibberish type english
It's disappointing seeing Br. Uthman being so close to becoming a madkhali.
Doesn't he see how these rulers are LITERALLY fighting Islam? Not only in their countries, internationally!
Hasn't Br. Uthman seen the tens of scholars jailed in Saudi for example?
Same notion from my side. He reiterates the Madkhali defence against the rulers.
Do you deny a clear narration from the Messenger pbuh? Or is your desire to call out the rulers stronger than your submission to Allah and His Prophet? Name calling those of the Sunnah is not new, that is all you people of desires have.
@@hamzanocap The clear narration when the Prophet PBUH says: that the best of martyrs is Hamza, and a man stood up to an oppressive ruler? Or the narration when he PBUH said the Ummah will no longer have any weight/effect if it doesn't say to the oppressor: you are oppressive? (obviously I'm paraphrasing)
@@Addakhel Was the ruler Hamza stood up to Muslim...?
@@hamzanocap Rulers that dont apply Sharia are Taghut, their outer appearance doesnt matter bro. Wake up brother, its not about calling out rulers. Its about our heartfelt desire to live in an islamic state, with a Muslim ruler that applies the Sharia.
I love listening to Shaykh Uthman. Clear, methodical, and always based upon evidence.
Yes. Alhamdulillah.
I love to listen to anyone who speaks the truth and brings evidence. Where is the evidence in what he said? Daniel made a video responding to this. Walahi it is depressing to see muslims engaged in this.
@@HumbleServantofAllah642 Uthman makes clear mistakes. The problem is he reads books with no teacher smh
@@m4fital2 no teacher?? don't about someone when u never really know them akhi.
I love this guy. May bless his him abundanlty for his efforts. And you too dilly.
Many of these comments hurt to read. Have shame people!!
This is your brother, a very respectable brother at that subhan Allah! yet you call him names and critisize him. If this is how you treat a fellow muslim, i wouldn’t dare think how you'd treat an enemy.
Calling names, I agree maybe not but Shaykh Uthman and all scholars of Islam are fallible thus are not above criticism
jahil spotted 🚨@@khairt1731
He should not delve in issues that there is legitimate disputation and seek to sow discord and disunity.
Amazing podcast. I love sheik Uthman and our brother Dilly for his amazing work. I am waiting for the 2nd part of the podcast.
Unfortunately, he is not Hanbali. He looks at the adillah, meaning he is deeming himself knowledgeable enough to do tarjeeh of the scholars' positions.
Yeah because he’s not a BLIND follower like his family who were hanafi were when they weren’t even following the Fiqh of the ahnaaf…you dummies don’t respect knowledge you respect sheep smh
the level of arrogance is extreme on someone who lacks basic nahw lol
You need to grow up
Aren't u allowed to do so after u reach a certain level of understanding of fiqh?
The idea is to always go back to Allah and his messenger ﷺ if there is confusion on something
@@maazmustafa2322 In principle, a student can study the adillah of the madhhab. They can understand them or fail to understand them. They may personally be swayed to one position over another WITHIN the madhhab. However, a student of knowledge needs to reach a higher level within the madhhab to actually say which of the two positions is preferable from within the madhhab's principles. This is the level of being a murajjih in one's school. Are there ulema' like this today? yes. But I do not believe Brother Uthman is at that level. He is doing some good da'wah work alhamdulillah. One cannot simply do tarjeeh willy-nilly on the basis of their personal opinion. They need to be schooled in the principles of the madhhab so that their understanding represents a madhhab understanding and not an individualistic understanding. And Allah knows best. I hope I represented the idea well. May Allah bless everyone on this thread, Salafi or otherwise
Daies should just admit that almost all Muslim Ruler have not implemented the Shariah and are guilty of Istibdal(replacing the laws of Allah with other kufr secular laws and system) and Istihlal (Make halal what Allah made Haraam and Vice versa) which are MAJOR KUFR, BUT we are unable to remove them Physically and the harm outweighs the good hence we should not rebel.
This could have been an honest point of view rather trying directly or INDIRECTLY trying to defend these rulers. Your gonna be questioned for that on the day of Judgement.
And when the fitnah (trial, discord) occurred in the time of ʿUthmān, some people said to Usāmah bin Zayd , ‘Will you not speak to ʿUthmān?’ So he said, ‘Do you think that I have not spoken to him, just because you have not heard it from me? Verily I will speak to him concerning what is between him and me, without opening an affair which I would not like to be the first to open.’ [An authentic narration: Related by Ahmad (3/403) and Ibn Abī ʿĀsim (2/521)
So when they (the Khārijites) opened it, evil took place in the time of ʿUthmān . They opposed ʿUthmān openly, thus completing the tribulations, fighting and corruption, which has not ceased to affect the people to this day, was brought about. And this caused the tribulation to occur between ʿAlī and Muʿāwiyah, and ʿUthmān was killed for these reasons …
@@MAli99923 So are you Comparing the Khilafah of Uthman RA to the modern day western backed secularist nationalists rulers of the Muslim lands?
@@biggytough2586 Are you saying Islam changed??
Also do you know difference between Quran 5.44 - 47... 3 situations where they don't rule by Allah's law but three different rulings?
I don't think he does know it lol
@@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543
I hope u don't live in the west & criticizing muslim rulers :)@@biggytough2586
his arabic is extremely weak
Nobody is perfect may Allah SWT reward him for the good he does in spreading tawheed
@@argbbonanza shouldnt claim to be a shaykh whilst making school boy errors
@@argbbonanza he cant even recite quran properly
jahil spotted 🚨@@khairt1731
@@husnainshahzad2165 jahil spotted 🚨
Has the issue of him and Karim Abu Zaid attempting to publicly humiliate Daniel H been brought up as well as him showing his 2 faced true colours on that embarrassing podcast with Dawah Man as well as his many Arabic mistakes including from the Quran which was exposed by the brothers in Bradford been brought up as well?
Shaykh yasir al Hanafi invited him to sit with him after he welcomed any deobandi and he his away
Was that public humiliation?.isnt that exaggerated language.i don't know the whole issue so I can't say
Sheikh Uthman probably gets the most Shahadas than most Daees combined, he has 99 more good things than bad, rather than backbiting him and trying to make him look bad to non Muslims, you can try do to at least 1% of what he does for Islam and the Muslims, try to excuse his mistakes, may Allah guide us all.
Daniel H is the one who wanted to publicly speak with Sheikh Uthman
@@khairt1731 Evidence is clear on his channel, there are real scholars who might not be perfect at reciting Qur'an, plus if you struggle reading the Qur'an you get two rewards, any more crap?
I love sh Uthman. May Allah protect him and bless his work. The podcast was very beneficial as well msA.
I'd really look forward to a 2nd podcast to drill down into the political side. While it's very clear in Islam that we shouldn't rebel against our rulers for oppression alone, we can definitely criticise them. Umar ibn Al'Khattab himself was criticised and allowed it. Imam Ahmed in Hanbal publicly spoke out against the fitna of khalq al-Quran. There are many other examples.
However, rebellion is a different issue. The question here should be, is a ruler that actively *hates* Islam and Muslims still a Muslim ruler worth obeying? A ruler who's sole purpose is to shut down any and all Muslim work?
At the end of the day, those who say rebellion is haram would still follow those who rebelled if their revolution is successful even if they think it's haram to do so.
Much of the salaf rebelled and fought against the rulers FOR OPPRESSION. For example Abdullah ibn Amr was being oppressed by having his property taken away by the Ummayyad rulers and when asked by someone to just let it go so he wouldn't die, he replied with the famous statement of the Prophet (saw) : "Whoever is killed defending his wealth, he is a martyr". There are many more examples from the tabieen who were in constant battles against the Ummayyads for their oppression
The secular rulers of today that are consistently dismantling the Sharia and oppressing Muslims by killing and imprisoning them are much worse than the Ummayyads or Abbasids or Ottomans
@@wakemeup38 what do you think criticism will lead to? you dont know what you are talking about
Problem is that all the Muslim rulers aren’t even independent they are just puppets
Enjoying good and forbiding evil is the deen of Muhammed and Allah. Sheikh Uthman is wrong here. If the ruler promotes evil, we call it out, he is not our Prophet. Same goes for our parents
Do it in the presence of the ruler the same way you do it in the presence of your parents
@@longegg-wind9577 Of course. And if my parents were public figures i would also make the same statements. This is the deen of the Rasool(PBUH), it's not to be played around with
Ka’b ibn ‘Ujrah reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “Verily, rulers will come after me and whoever enters their audience, affirms their lies, and supports their oppression, they are not part of me and I am not part of them. They will have no presence at the Fountain. Whoever does not enter their audience, does not support their oppression, and does not affirm their lies, he is part of me and I am part of him. He will be present at the Fountain.”
Source: Sunan al-Tirmidhī 2190
Grade: Sahih (authentic)
The asl is private, only scholars who understand nuance can criticize in public...
Project guiding Light has very good videos on this issue imo. BarakAllahu Feekum 🏳️🤲🏼☝🏼
I agree with Sheikh with everything but his stance on rulers. His position is very shallow unfortunately. Rulers in the Arab world are actually Western agents who fight Islam publicly.
Unfortunately, he didn't mention the historic circumstances around the stance he adopts.
Yet. I love the Sheikh
Why don't people call for Shariah? & reject Demotrashy
Imam Malik didn’t obey the rulers so he was almost beat to death and imprisoned
Imam Ahmad Bin Hanbal too, when he opposed the mutazili rulers asking him to declare that the Quran is created.
@@vol94 and Hussain ibn Ali didnt obey Yazeed so whats this nonsense u must obey the ruler
The point is that
They didn't obey the ruler when they asking them somthing against islamic laws. So if the ruler asked them somthing with no Islamic conflict then they have to obey him as mentioned in Qur'an and Sunnah.
@@e.k874you have to obey the rulers when they rule with sharia and not with democracy and as long as he doesn’t order you to do something which is haram (like i Imam Maliks time) or Shirk/Kuffr (like in Imam Ahmads time)
hell no i will not obey the munafiq zionest lover arab rulers of UAE BAHrain etc @@adrenalin4122
And were Saudi worried about Aqidah in Algeria, Egypt and Yemen?
@NejadIhsanBeliefs, theology
who is Saudi?
@NejadIhsan I agree. In fact linguistically Aqeedah ends up meaning a contract between us and Allah in terms of the beliefs we hold, with the correct ones ending in Jannah and the false ones in Jahannam.
Every president must take responsibility for its own country . Algeria and Yemen have presidents Saudi is not their care taker
What a ridiculously disingenuous understanding of the madahib. Imam Abu Hanifas r.a. students went agaisnt him. This is true outwardly but what he doesn't mention is that they were at the level of mujahid mutlaq themselves, they were of such a high level they could have derived usool and created their own school. This also shows that the school for over a millenia is developing. With all due respect this Ustadh isn't even on the level of ahlul tarjih never mind mujtahid mutlaq. Meaning he's no way near the calibre of scholar that can directly go back to the quran and Sunnah, derive his own usool and then make ijtihaad on fiqh. He his a muqallid of the Hanaabilah, so how on earth does it make sense to say you follow the quran and Sunnah, when he binds himself to hanbali usool and does taqleed of their rulings. Do you see the contradictions 😂
What I believe Ustaadh is trying to say and I think he did mention it is not to blind follow any imam, key point 👍🏻
when it comes to Quran and sunnah over imams you go with the Quran and sahi hadeeth…never once did he say anything against any of the imams in his speech, he spoke about them all with great respect and status…what he mention was just a fact which seems to burn you and I don’t know what that is brother. You may need therapy.
May be he is doing dawah but when it came to internal matters he didn't tell truth
@@nsayyed5469 what internal matters 😂🤦🏻♂️ what are you on about ?
Very arrogant wahhabe that's why. He think he is something after studying deen few years. He cant even read arabic correctly and man so many mistakes while he recite Quran. Been video documented. He should be shane to tall even madhab. But bjggest issues is. 5 pillar person call him and let him talk about madhab .. It Like this. Someone had a car accident and person havr brain damage and need to be quickly operation. And hospital goes to street and asks if anyone know how to do brain surgery and someone says yes i watch video about it last see. And hospital says ok come to do surgery. This is the Same mindset this guy has.. Useless really.
@@ÜmmetinHizmetkarları haha just in your first sentence, I can see how ignorant you are. You may actually not even be Muslim probably an atheist or Christian lol…
News flash !!!! Aqeedah is more important than being able to read Quran with tajweed or making mistake in pronunciation…
You must be another hater !! Que up buddy there’s plenty of haters against the truth!
Who and what is wahaabi ?? Lol so ignorant go and learn !
MashAllah, Great work Brother Dilly.
Great talk from Sheikh Uthman…
The fact of the matter is that the brother has no idea about Islam at all.
His knowledge of Arabic is negative zero.
الله المستعان!
@@ABC-wi6vt This is a great museeba amongst the ummah nowadays. The main cause of this is ignorance and fanaticism. A lot of people know Uthman Ibn Farooq has no idea when it comes to the basic of the deen and yet they promote him and appointed him as a community leader and imam in the US because of their ego. They don’t care about the damage and misguidance of the individual which will effect the ummah at large.
الله المستعان!
@@ABC-wi6vt Ameen.
His knowledge on fiqh is also below zero
May Allah protect Shaykh Uthman and brother Dily
His trying
This was an excellent episode, you really did your homework Dilly and asked precise, need to know questions
He was very clear and we ended up seeing an authentic unequivocal discussion
Why do 5pillars finds the need to do a podcast on Fiqhi issues with the likes of "Shaykh" Usman who cannot read Surah Al Fatiha properly with Tajweed.
This is how you lose credibility.
Usman tells Daniel so your not a scholar, so you don’t teach fiqh. Why is Usman khan teaching Fiqh and Aqeedah because he said he’s also not a Scholar? This guy is super deceitful.
My first time listening to Shaykh Uthman and I’m blessed to do so. Jazakallah khair.
I find the double standard by Salafi Madkhalis amazing and how much they lack self-awareness. Calling the Ottoman Caliphs unIslamic, while at the same time defending rulers who were responsible for the murder of Jamal Khashoggi is simply breathtaking.
This is the problem with the Salafi movement, which has an inconsistent approach both to Aqidah and Fiqh. A person ultimately follows the opinion that best suits his whims under the disguise of the Quran and Sunnah.
For over 40 years these people have been telling us to follow Quran and Sunnah and the Salaaf. When facts are pointed out to them that
1. Imam Abu Hanifah (Tabie)
2. Imam Malik (Taba Tabie)
3. Imam Shafee (Taba, Taba Tabie)
4. Imam Hanbal (Not from the Salaaf) Very Pious but not from the Salaaf
Making unfounded claims Imam Abu Hanifah did not know hadith!
The only thing you can rely on is the human Sanad, what was the moral character of your teacher and his teacher going all the way back to Prophet Muhammad (SAW). What the Salaafi fail to mention, is how they cannot validate the hadith book collection can you prove the hadith you today is the actual collection by the author of the collection.
Secondly, Language and meaning change over time. Can you interpret the hadith today correctly while disregarding the interpretation of the scholars from the 1st and 2nd Islamic centuries?
The likelihood Imam Mahdi will be a Salaafi is very small. According to the following hadith, he will not be pious until Allah corrects him overnight.
Source: Sunan Ibn Mājah 4085
Grade: Sahih li ghayrihi (authentic due to external evidence) according to Al-Albani
‘Ali al-Qari said, “Allah will set right his affairs and raise his status in one night, or in a moment of one night, such that those invested with authority will agree upon his Caliphate.”
So all the posturing by Salaafi is not helping the Ummah.
Were Sahaba, tabeen & 4 imams deobandi or Ashari Aqeeda ? lol
Jahl
@@dcanebreezy5784 The fact, you equate seminary with Aqeeda school shows who the Jahl is.
Let me explain it to you. Deobandi was a school set up by the Muslims in India after the defeat of Muslims by the British in 1866.
For over 1000 years Muslims, either were Maturid, Ashari or Hanbali aqeeda, which you follow. When an Atheist asks you a question, can "Allah create a fire that he cannot put out". Your answer will be to go away Jahl. However, Maturidi and Ashari will have an answer.
Surah Al-Baqarah - 258
Abraham said: Lo! Allah causeth the sun to rise in the East, so do thou cause it to come up from the West. Thus was the disbeliever abashed. And Allah guideth not wrongdoing folk.
Wouah i didn't know:)
Listen, it's not about responding atheists
It's a creedle issue about Allah swt.
AShari & Matrudi took Ilm Al Kalam which is greek philosophy & applied it on Allah swt & interprted Texts with philosophical views not as Rassoul Allah, sahaba & tabeen nor 4 imams believed.
You interpret Names & attributes of Allah swt, when Sahaba & rassoul Allah & The salaf did not.
Listen, won't waste more time, you just remind me of Christians who used Philosophy on Allah swt
We follow Sahaba who learned from Rassoul Allah.
Period@@AbdulEssa-kp4vf
@@AbdulEssa-kp4vf Hanbali Aqeeda ? lol
U mean Hanbali fiqh :)
4 imams Aqeeda is the Aqeeda of rassoul Allah. Dont't try to put philosophical Aqeeda with Sahaba's aqeeda & imams
@@dcanebreezy5784 Today there are many atheists amongst the Muslims in Pakistan Saudi Arabia and many Muslim countries around the world. The Salafi movement does not address the intellectual challenges posed by Agnostics and Atheists in the Muslim community.
It was because of the threat of the Mu'tazilites, that these great Aqeeda scholars came. The fact you saying it is a waste of time tells me, you did very poorly in school and you have no GCSE to your name. You are the modern-day Bedouin roaming around most likely in Sparkhill.
Much respect, Shaykh Uthmaan! الله يحفظك
This guy needs to stick to his dawah and comparative religion. He's not a scholar, he doesn't even have basic Arabic. His opening speech about divisions being caused by those who follow madhabs is very insincere; it is he who vigorously criticises certain Islamic schools such as that of Deoband to whom he has attributed multiple false statements/beliefs and when challenged about them simply goes into hiding and refuses to provide any evidence for his false claims. May Allah guide him or take away the platform that he has been given.
jahil spotted 🚨
@@Durray13 Yes Uthman Farooq has indeed acted like a jahil...
th-cam.com/video/U1YAqB91uMM/w-d-xo.html
The fact that you take your Deen from him is truly astounding.
@@Durray13 I suggest you watch this before blindly following Uthman:
th-cam.com/video/pE6Y3DofOoA/w-d-xo.html
12:38
من ترك الصلؤة.
He said it wrong.... That cant even be a slip of tongue... Literally doesnt make sense the way he said the hadeeth. Im shocked
how shocking is that? kinda like earth-shattering one?@@kemchy3838
Dilliy hussein calling him shaykh and he can't read basic quran. My mum does not make major mistakes like him. He is making major mistakes in quran which is unacceptable.
A shaykh can't read quran
jahil spotted 🚨
Farooq's fanboy spotted@@Durray13
slander spotted @@AbdulH97 🤡
@@Durray13 , it's not slander if it's true.. the videos of his poor arabic are available all other TH-cam.. It's not slander..
Guy is supposed to have a masters in hadith sciences.. It's a minimum requirement to be able to read and understand arabic.
It would need to be a very crappy university that would allow someone who so badly struggles with arabic a masters in hadith sciences
gee u talks like i was defending him, im not 😅@@kabhussain3113
Brother Dilly should’ve asked him about Shaykh Yasir Al-Hanafi responding to his invitation to sit with ulema
The greatest cause of disunity amongst "Sunnis" broadly conceived is the Wahhabi doctrine of tripartite tawhid and their new-fangled conception of bid'ah.
There is nothing called Wahhabi
Allah is The Wahhab.
Muhammed ibn Abd Al Wahhab didn't bring anything new. If doing tawaf around graves & call to dead people is islam for you, i'd like to inform you this is not our religion (according to Quran & Sunnah) Period!
Wahhabi doctrine ? can u teach me please about it ? Oh, you mean we need to follow the philosophy doctrine right ? of people who came 4 centuries after The prophet
Sorry!
Their new conception of Bidah ? have u read about Sahaba & 3 first generations, 4 imams & bukhari ..etc
If u want to make a religion of your whimes & desires don't call urself Muslim.
You seem to not learn from previous nations lol
“Look at evidences”, you have your evidences, the other side has theirs.
wdym by you have your evidences & other side has theirs ?
Is adopting Greek philosophy is what Rassoul Allah, Sahaba, Tabeen & four imams were on ?
People of desires & innovation will never change.
@@dcanebreezy5784the day you can explain to me that you are not even 2% of the Muslim population and the rest are on the sunnah are wrong I will give you time to speak. Otherwise without knowledge, listening to a few speeches - do not talk.
Again, most lay muslims are not aware of deep creedle issue so you rubbish unstatistics are not real.
do u know islam more than Sahaba ? Quboori@@mnuhs5
Even sufi in my country knows that Allah swt is above his creation on his throne.
Do u know that old ashairah believed that too ? :)
won't waste my time with 2% rubbish stats ignorant@@mnuhs5
@@mnuhs5dw the guy ur referring to is a clown. Hes probably the type person to claim all the Islamic golden age scholars as good even tho most of them were ashari or maturidi in aqeedah, and were mainly hanafi and then Maliki coming second 😂😂😂😂 such goofballs
59:43 but at the conference DH explicitly told him that it would’ve been nice if he had contacted him privately about these issues.
So confused on who’s telling the truth here.
th-cam.com/video/8mTshPbfKzw/w-d-xo.htmlsi=p8zib4rp5qu0Yq5u
Does he know Arabic tho? Because he makes numerous mistakes that even a 2nd year student would pick up. He does good debate work, no doubt, but I question his qualifications
Right it doesn’t make sense
Could be but grammar is different from knowledge atleast In some sense
@@Xenor9hhhnahw is the father of all sciences and sarf is the mother.
@NejadIhsanGoogle translate
Do you know Arabic????
May Allah reward you brother Dilly for bringing the case of brother Daniel's "inqusition". That scene had really left a bitter taste at us,it was really unnecessary putting brother Daniel into that situation.
Daniel put himself in that situation.
Daniel put himself in that situation and got schooled
@@ABC-wi6vt😂😂
Don't think it was unnecessary at all. It was better. Only ones who feel bad are hard-core Daniel fanboys. He was brought on stage to clarify his own stance to us laymen. That's what it was - a clarification IN HIS OWN words but fanboys understood it to be a humiliation of Daniel.
The last part of Daniel taking shahadah with a salafi touch was just added as a light hearted joke to calm down super salafis
@@wally86_sorry brother, I doubt that. Everyone could clearly see Br Daniel schooled the panel trying to question him. The 'Sheikhs' tried to put Deobandis under the bus, but they got schooled about that also.
Really enjoyed this podcast and learnt a lot. Going to stop criticising Muslim rulers as I agree it's not my place to say. Barakallahu Feekum to Shaykh Uthman, OMF, Dilly and the 5Pillars team.
My brother, I have been following you for years. I think that Sheikh Othman dealt with some of the problems that some young Muslims fall into in the West. I think that the political journalist Salman Al-Ansari will be the best guest after Sheikh Othman bin Al-Faruq to talk about politics in the Middle East and how Muslim rulers deal with imperial powers. In the Western world, and how the Arab peoples deal specifically with the rulers, and the position of the Arab peoples towards the Muslim Brotherhood, as well as the Turkish, Persian and Zionist ambitions in the Arab world, as well as the reasons for the emergence of Al Qaeda and ISIS in the Islamic world, and how we build an Islamic civilization that advances among the countries of the civilized world.
It is possible to talk about issues such as the Palestinian, Libyan, Yemeni, Syrian and Iraqi issues, and how Muslim rulers deal with them according to the law of security and political interest.
And what hinders Muslims from scientific, civilizational, and military progress, etc.?
And our problems are with the donkeys of colonialism and with the slaves of the occupiers, and they are known to every scholar of politics.
Likewise, the problem of Islamic countries with left-liberal extremism in Western media and politics
Likewise, how do we confront the media demonizing Islam in all means of channels and social communication that are led by international channels in the Western world, and many countries of the world copy Western news in Japan, Korea, etc..
Sharing your views with journalist Salman Al-Ansari will clarify a lot of understanding of the political reality as it is, and not as we dream or want to do it.
There can never be unity with Salafis , in all their different colours from followers of al Albani, ibn Baz, al madkhali etc who all follow Quran and sunnah yet differ on many many masaail and are all on each others throats as well very negative towards all other Muslims who don’t agree with them .
The speaker isn’t a specialist in Islamic knowledge , he’s good at defending Islam and in dawah so questions should have been restricted to such .
One of their ‘ great contributions’ they’ve taught the ummah is how to label each other non believers from their most extreme strands to innovators in their lighter strands to the point one will see a revert or a newly practicing Muslim who can’t even recite Quran properly using kufr and bidah regularly in their speech !
We all agree on the unity of all Muslim ln Sha Allah
I’m sorry but his argument in regards to calling out rulers and being in the west and going to those countries is such a bogus argument. Their are scholars that have done this in for example Saudi, and we know what has happened to them. Yet these salafis don’t praise them for that they still have some excuse to accuse them of khuruj.
And also there is a huge difference between advising rulers who have made mistakes and oppressive rulers who are killing and changing the religion and even opposing Islam.
Uthman ibn Farooq is affected too much by Harry Potter novels. The ruler/Voldermort who must never be mentioned by name...what nonsense is this. Also if he was a salafi, he would know that the salaf pretty much did revolutions every year against the Ummayad and Abbasid rulers. It was only later on with the Asharis that revolting against rulers became a taboo topic.
As a defending for the Ottomans (as a non Turk):
The Ottoman khulafa were highly educated and had really good Islamic education.
Not only them, but their whole administration. The ulama had a lot of power and could prevent the khalifa from decisions.
He’s a wahabi/salafi, they don’t recognize the khalifa of Osman Ghazi simply because he’s not Arab and because they fought wars against each other including ww1
Whaaaat?!!! How is he a sheikh?
Observing what hes been spewing out at the beginning, this guy doesn't even understand what a madhhab is.
Then he goes onto make a mistake in the hadeeth: من ترك الصلاة فقد كفر, he pronounces it as "man tarkussalah" and not 'man tarakassalah' 😂 that's just basic Arabic man!
He needs to go back to basics - especially makharij. His pronunciation of names of books and words like 'madhaahib' 'madaaris' is OFF.
He should stick to da'wah only. Teaching is not for him.
Allahul musta'aan.
Time to
Daniel Haqiqatjou has answered about the stuff that was discussed about him
Man, I still have a lot to learn about islam because I didn't understand anything from 1:50 to about 10:00 lol
You will get there إن شاء الله ❤
May Allah make it easy for you ❤️
Modi killing Kashmiris & when attacked Kashmir Modi got some sort of medal from a Muslim leader when he visited the Middle East just a couple of weeks later cant remember which country it was Qatar or another, completely disagree with this Sheikh about saying Muslims have to always have to follow these corrupt leaders
We are truly blessed to have shiekhs like this. May Allah SWT reward Shiekh Uthman in abundance Allahumma Ameen ❤
@Bro Dilly. I was shocked on your silence when Shaykh Uthman said Istegatha (via the Prophet S.A.W) is shirk. I was so surprised, you moderated the whole debate with Shaykh Asrar and Ustad AbderRahman. His calling millions of Muslims mushrik, tbh you should not have remained silent. This is dividing the ummah because ppl like them saying we are mushrik.
I get it biddah is different, but mushrik , common that's like saying we are worse than Qadiyanni. Qadiyani are not doing shirk (but kufr) , but we are labelled as mushrik, which means we have no chance ever going jannah.
I know your views on this, and you should never have remained silent, am so sadded by this
There is no Istighatha through any prophet or anything. Shirk
Brother, it's shirk that doesn't mean you are a kaffir & u will go to jahanam but u have to repent & do it correctly.
Pray to Allah swt he does accept it why would u make someone in the middle..
Qadiyani are kuffar out of the fold of islam.
يقول الله -تبارك وتعالى: وَإِذَا سَأَلَكَ عِبَادِي عَنِّي فَإِنِّي قَرِيبٌ أُجِيبُ دَعْوَةَ الدَّاعِ إِذَا دَعَانِ فَلْيَسْتَجِيبُوا لِي وَلْيُؤْمِنُوا بِي لَعَلَّهُمْ يَرْشُدُونَ [سورة البقرة:186].
May Allah Reward Sheikh Uthman, Brother Dilly & all at 5 Pillars
Is there a Hadith which says, IF RIBA BECOMES WIDE SPREAD IN MUSLIM LANDS ….It becomes COMPULSORY FOR EVERY MUSLIM MAN AND WOMAN MUST PERFORM JIHAD Until it is Removed…?
Barak Allah o Fiqom…
Asim
He keeps on saying he wants unity that's why he mentions the other schools. But sadly when he came for his last tour he created so much fitnah over Aqeedah Ashari Maturidi. He made an announcement before he even came which I don't see how that is beneficial for the muslim. His good at his dawah..but I would not want him to deliver a khutbah or be an Imām as he does create division. Even one of the Salafi Imams had to tell him in green lane masjid to calm down with taking the mick of other Muslim groups not to add the conversation between Daniel...
Insightful. Mashaallah.
May Allah bless the Ulema of Deoband who upon the Quran and Sunnah
Ameen
They are not upon the quran and sunnah
Than why so many bidaah comes from them
@@maisamsadigi1658 Ikr
I'm very interested to hear Ust Nouman discuss music with Syekh Usthman. I'm often confused abt it's haram or halal status. Where I am, nasyid is common. Or songs with religious lyrics are super popular and played on the radio or TV all the time. And nasyid groups performed them in special events. If it's haram, why is it not condemned? 🤔
MashaAllah very good and conscience explanation to all the questions brother dilly posed may Allah bless ustad Uthman Ibn Farooq. We need well educated and well spoken knowledgeable people giving dawah. People who give dawah please stop dividing the ummah and start explaining your points with wisdom and knowledge without the pantomime and theatrics its getting unbearable now.
Uthman Still not responded to al islam production or hanafi fiqh channel. Hes good at talking the talk but when he gets put on his toes he backs out.
The greater harm can often come from staying silent and letting the ruler secularise entire nations, rather than speaking up and criticising. This is why we have the crisis we have today.
You have to look at the long-term picture on a case-by-case basis, rather than having a blanket rule “never criticise the ruler”.
What benefits does criticising make?
@@AdamAliAden In many cases it can (and has) put pressure on the ruler, from inside and from outside, to make changes or not go too far. Wise rulers will pay attention to what others are saying, in order not to lose control. Muslim rulers are no different.
@@imranqqq7307 But what does the hadeeth say? Advise them in private, so lets stick to the hadeeth
@@MAli99923 The hadith says IF one intends to advise a ruler, do so privately. But most criticism of rulers nowadays is to inform the public of the ruler's actions (for example, collaboration with Israel) rather than to advise the ruler. Secondly, the reason generally given to keep quiet in the ahadeeth is the greater harm to Muslims if they rebel or disobey. I am pointing out that in SOME cases at least, the greater harm can come from keeping quiet and letting the ruler do whatever he wants.
@@imranqqq7307 And when the fitnah (trial, discord) occurred in the time of ʿUthmān, some people said to Usāmah bin Zayd , ‘Will you not speak to ʿUthmān?’ So he said, ‘Do you think that I have not spoken to him, just because you have not heard it from me? Verily I will speak to him concerning what is between him and me, without opening an affair which I would not like to be the first to open.’ [An authentic narration: Related by Ahmad (3/403) and Ibn Abī ʿĀsim (2/521)
So when they (the Khārijites) opened it, evil took place in the time of ʿUthmān . They opposed ʿUthmān openly, thus completing the tribulations, fighting and corruption, which has not ceased to affect the people to this day, was brought about. And this caused the tribulation to occur between ʿAlī and Muʿāwiyah, and ʿUthmān was killed for these reasons …
How can you take any rule of someone ruler who is doing concerts etc it’s like take any hukum
Not knowing Imam Abu Hanifa's actual name isn't a negative haha I think the bigger issue is he wasn't raised in an Islamic household, which often leads people to become wahabi or wahabi styled as those groups did admirable work in disenfranchised youth. But the problem is, so much of their work is also problematic and this can be viewed in a number of Farooqs statements.
Barelvis believe that one cannot pray behind those who have diffrent manhaj and deem them as disbelievers. And you have the guts to talk about Sheikh Abdulwahab.
@sanwenexsanwenex2617 I don't think u need guts to talk about "Shaykh " abul wahab lol
@@sanwenexsanwenex2617 who mentioned barelvis here?
Correct me if i’m wrong but Uthman is leaning towards wahabis even if he says it’s ok to follow madhabs because they sugarcoat nowadays and Salahaddin alayubi رحمه الله was a ash’ary and majority of the muslims were ash’aris and maturidis after the first 3 decades. and btw Ibn kathir رحمه الله mentioned this in his tafsir that someone went to the prophet ﷺ grave and made du’a ( clarification about tawassul and istighatha - we know and believe that Allah gives and takes like sustenance and children and forgiveness for our sins ) but sheikh ibn taymya had different views and said it’s not allowed and he was kinda alone there but Muhammad bin abdulwahab went to extremes and i wanted this to be talked about. And saudi arabia isn’t ruling by the Quran but those madkhali wahabis give fatwas to follow the rulers even though clearly they’re not following the Quran and I believe muslims should be smart like Sheikh Asrar Rashid said on 103 podcast .
Cope
Oh no! Has this guy got no shame?? He can't even recite Quran properly and he is criticising the Hanafi madhab!
Oh no! What about all those 100s who could do so and criticised/ disagreed with the view of the hanafis on many positions (like eating seafood besides fish)?
@@maazmustafa2322 but those who had legitimate differences/ ikhtilaaf with the Hanafis could recite the Qur'an properly! 🤣
@@abyrahman6610 isn't that what I said "what about all the 100s who COULD DO SO........"
Sheikh can't recite quran properly, u can't read properly 😂😂
@@maazmustafa2322 you obviously missed the point!
@@abyrahman6610 Stick to 1 thing lol. First u already mention something I said in my comment, now when I've showed u how u missed that, u say I missed something.
If ur point is hanafi position on an issue is the correct one, then no. Many of the hanafi positions have been against what the other 3 madahib believed in.
But if u say he isn't qualified to judge hanafi ulema, then we can look into his qualifications to determine that
Can I contact him from email or anything? How can I? I need it sir. I want to understand the true God, please help me
The forked tongue on this guy...
He completely dodges the issue of Saudi jailing scholars. Scholars who did not even criticise the rulers but criticised things like cinemas.
The only fork tongue guy is you ... are you going to go ssj and free them? Or are you just cariji... the point is they lead security even if they wrong, and non Muslims want curuj to replace always...
Do u know how to criticize Rulers ? even tho i 'm not fan of these rulers
Do u know how to criticize according to Sunnha ? or just throwing claims? or maybe a khariji O.o
Did Arab springs offered Muslims any good thing except Destruction, secularism & atheism.
Brother Dilly , very rarely u have disappointed in this interview.