Follow my instagram.com/berks_2h/ $KOLEE telegram crypto channel - t.me/koleecoin Follow my editiors channel : th-cam.com/channels/MQjHYbwFrF4Rd9JfLbeu_g.html Discord where we can chat- discord.gg/ESFcXccHmA Feel free to donate to help cover petrol/food costs that go into making these videos! www.paypal.me/koleeberks
Her demeaner was that of a small child who had been told, "no", by their parent, so they respond by continually asking the same question again in that really annoying tone, in the hope that the parent will eventually just give in to shut them up.
Its a little more serious than that the DS has just exposed herself to a civil claim for battery which will cost the MET probably 3 grand or more. CRIMBODGE channel here has been taken down but he has an excellent Website and for a £5 explains exactly how to do it. Hit em in the pocket they will start making sure that their officers enforce the law as its written in the Statute (Gov.uk).
if you're silent, the moment the costable drops the "perfectly legal" bomb, you can actually hear her farting out a big brown color pencil right in her underwear.
That copper was actually sound, he knew you, knows the score as he said it's legal. He gave her fair warning. Respect to him and from me that does not come easy
True, but after that he descended into rubbish questions and concerns like under covers in jeopardy it’s unusual it’s not nice etc then wandered off without manning up and resolving or directing miss flutter pants . . Completely gutless and useless
The sergeant there was backpeddling so hard trying to regain control of the situation. That's a clear illegal detention right there, didn't even specify the legislation - and actually they never confirmed at the end you were undetained either
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂the look on her face when the educated officer in uniform told her "you can if you want but I personally won't be" quality 👍 If the officers are reading this, this is why people audit, to hold you accountable for your actions and record any and all interactions with law enforcement. You are not law makers you are law enforcers, just because you don't like something it does not mean we have to obey your directives. Learn the law and stop abusing legislation set out to detain and arrest criminals, they were not designed for you to obtain details because you feel like it. Someone needs to get a petition going to get all police officers in the uk covered with their own public liability insurance so when we sue them for assault and false imprisonment it will be them that foot the bill and not the tax payer.
The police justify their actions based on their own view, that is why he said that. They don't group, and say that is wrong or right. They are trained to follow what the other does, based on that person's outlook.
Which in itself is wrong. His response should have been "If you wanna detain him you can BUT I will then have to uphold the law and protect him from your illegal actions sarge".
@@stoopingfalcon891 You got that right. sarge is God to the ranks below and whipping boy to the senior ranks above and thats a direct quote from a real sarge long since retired. Get the wrong side of your sargents (2 per relief) and they could make life hell for you. I got a bollocking from my sergeant after a Letter of Commendation had been couriered in from a grateful father whose young son I had found. My crime was whilst recounting what had happened to my Duty Inspector (Reporting on letter to Chief Constable) I stated that I had used my own initiative and the circumstances to deduce that the boy wouldn't be far away from his home address. He was found by me about 15 yards from their boundary fence some 4 1/2 hours after going missing from school. Sarge was at the school with most of the relief which had been well searched by the kids and teachers at the school after they discovered that he was missing.
So what's new, I'm a retired sergeant from a provincial force the standing joke has always been if nobody else will have you the MET will take anybody.
“I thought you was going to walk off” she didn’t seem to realise that you was allowed to. In spite of you asking her numerous times, she never did state what law she was using to detain you. Frankly it’s disgusting that we are paying Detective sargeant wages to a complete muppet who doesn’t even know how to detain someone.
I think she'd need more than "you're a man with s camera" to arrest you under section 43. It's not evidence of any wrongdoing and she'd need much more to get a conviction under terrorist legislation. A jury would laugh at that sort of stupidity. You should consider buying an old, but serviceable, phone/camera to do these audits in case they do seize it as evidence.
Fair play to that copper distancing himself from any illegal arrest/search. Wish they all were like him and able to speak up when they believe another officer is doing something wrong.
He said, he would assist her if she wanted to search him, he didn't distance himself from an illegal search/arrest. And if the shit hit the fan he still would have used force.
He knows hes being watched by 1000's of people and he didnt wanna make a dick of himself to his mates, however thats the first time ive seen it to that extent. anyway the DS hadnt got a clue what she was doing.
@@MrJonny2324 he has to assist if she were to still pursue it however what he did was tell her categorically what Kolee does and that he would not be doing anything except to assist her. He made it so that she could not do anything else.
She needs to be dealt with accordingly. Assault and attempted theft is the laws she broke. Really I think police need to get educated on what powers they really have and haven't got before jumping in at the deep end. You can legally do what you were doing but she doesn't know the law as well as you do. You would think it would be the other way around but it sadly isn't!!
Cameras are not Illegal ! Officer needs to go to work! She's violating your rights ! She is suspicious ! Report her! Violating her oath. Female is soliciting you!
And that is the calibre of detective we have to keep us safe, she didn’t have a scooby doo. In all my years of being in the legal profession I’ve seen some numpties but she has made it into my top ten. An affirmative hire/promotion.
I think you missed a trick there, The PC who knew you said "What are you trying to achieve" exactly that, Awareness that is not illegal to film in public and you need grounds to use Section 43 which the Lady didnt understand. Now she kinda does. Although im sure she will try it again with the next person
A Detective without an effing clue. I wonder what her detection rate is? No clear detention and no clear identification when asked. Clueless all round.
Of course she doesn’t deserve sacking she’s doing what the rest do question him about what he’s doing , unless you know of koleeberks like the police guy who knew him and knew that he does auditing
‘Can you come with me’ Remember what your mum told you about going anywhere with strangers. It can’t be unusual if he knows that you do lots of auditing.
I’m always shocked at where your subs are, you’re by far the best auditor. Always so composed, and well versed. Your generosity, and kind nature extended to our police operatives, knows no bounds 😂
only beacuse he knows its an audit ,and he doesnt want to look a fool or get sued ..before he knew what an audit was ,who knows what he would have done.
12:05 "What do you gain out of this?" asks the reasonable copper. The answer is that Kolee gains nothing except hassle, arrest, false criminal charges, unlawful detention, assault, to name a few. Kolee does get a bit of beer money but not enough to compensate him for the crimes against him by the police. Kolee does it for the benefit of all of us.
That woman either ignored the letter from the police commissioner, didn’t understand it, or blatantly ignores it. She seems very proud of her “powers.”
Couldn’t say this was your best audit Kolee, all respect due to the amazing auditor you are. You let this female officer assault you without grounds and then nearly look through your phone, all without giving her grounds for thinking you’re a terrorist. You shouldn’t of been as nice to her as you were, if the camera wasn’t rolling I bet this would of gone very differently
Please pursue legal action, I have been watching a lot of audits where the police clearly step over the line, and I may be wrong here, but there seems to be no consequences for their actions. I am just worried that these audits become exercises in futility if they are more or less just getting away with it. Your rights were 100% violated in this encounter, this can't be a whoops my mistake situation... Good luck moving forward and keep it up.
i feel that the big auditors(AB etc) in the UK have been visited by the men in suits recently because they all seem to have an air of futility and softness about their interactions in the past month or so....
Female DS was like a 'rabbit in the headlights' .She wanted to detain & search, but not under and official section. Never seen someone beg so much when they have all the power. 😂 To be fair the back up PC team could have still made her carry out the detain & search just out of spite, but were reasonable & clued up enough to know what your rights are.
So happy you you did this audit at forest gate police station and the muppets that work there..... can you please audit basildon police station and magistrates court next door .. they need educating bably
If they are concerned about hostile reconnaissance from a man with a camera, why are they not concerned about the building across the street? Some terrorist can rent one the rooms on the second floor, set up cameras and record the ins and outs of the police 24/7. This female copper and her male companion did not adhere to covid restrictions. She was very aggressive and eager to go hands on while saying she had the power to do so but never citing a specific law or statute. She also didn't know what he was doing was legal. She may have the right to question behavior but she lacks the ability to assess the situation and showed no regard to individual rights of kolee.
this one is so so deep, man. you are exceptional in all your words and actions. @ 12:00, firstly you said "i don't like doing this" (intimating you are doing it because it is a necessary public service), and when the very decent human asked you "what do you gain out of this", your silence, and their apparent penny-drop moment (although maybe that's just my perception) was very beautiful.
"Prior knowledge" - was the key point in this. Only one Cop had the foresight to be observant n informed. The Detective should be demoted to Tea Bag Lady, no clue of what Detective actually means yet titled as that - what a damn blunder. People put in positions if power by people who have no clue of reality n the law should not be running an institution that is clueless about the law it enforces..
How did that DS pass the promotion exam and her other detective colleague. She came out with all the usually platitudes about hostile reconnaissance and the filming of undercover officers. She had a break of luck when clued up uniformed officer turned up and tried to advise her in a discrete way that he would not participate in any way if she used a Section 43 Terrorism Act 'Stop and Search' . Taboo if a PC contradicts a sargent (God within the forces). Still by then the illegal detention and battery had taken place so a nice earner for you for a days work. Still its the only way to get the Police to respect the rights of the citizens that they swore to SERVE AND PROTECT and to get them to actually learn the laws that they are paid to enforce. Sadly things haven't improved from 50 years ago !
Uniformed officer and front desk guy were sound, those detectives are clueless though. Reassuring that they're investigating complex crimes with that lack of knowledge of the law
That there was a pure madness, she needs to pattern up and learn her job, how can she say “what would you usually do now with this man” she was clueless. As for that other officer, he was class, the way he said “I won’t personally be detaining him” made her look even more stupid. So Mr “Tik Tok 🤣”sensation, how does it feel to be recognised from Scotland Yard to Forrest Gate 👏🏼👍🏼🌍
Anyone who is an officer who isn't involved enough in the community to know what auditing is by now, shouldn't be one. Although they do give great content while making idiots of themselves, it's not very reassuring to the viewing public.
He never brings the NPCC guidence which is so stupid. His audits are getting much worse when it comes to educating these tyrants. He spends most of his agreeing with them.
Bro when they say they're detaining you, you gotta go straight in with 'let me know when I am no longer detained' and then keep asking what powers they're using to detain you. this way you know exactly how long you've been wrongfully detained for if u ever wanna sue.
You’re the auditor that always gets detained! Love how the police officer that wanted to look at your phone, didn’t have a clue what she was doing the silly woman!
The lady copper is worried there 'are other tings' on your phone - pictures of your family, maybe a recipe for Roast Pork, pictures of a bacon sandwich. A cookbook? Maybe you are into international finance and have a banking app? Or even worse, you have a Bitcoin wallet which could have evidence of your guilt of something which you are obviously innocent of until they prove otherwise.
I agree, she wanted to look at the phone because she wanted to do nothing more than a fishing expedition and have a good nose through his personal life to teach him a lesson about who has the authority here. Despicable.
@@VadoVoodoo One of the most silliest statements made is the confusion between the UK system, and the American system. The only reason the ignorant employee said that was relating to spying. The police follow a system of rules when looking at somebody's phone, if they were to download it, who knows on what could be recovered assuming there was a crime.
@@blenderocean But tbere was no evidence nor reasonable ARTICUABLE suspicion of a crime so any search would have been unlawful and a violation of civil rights. That is UK law too.
@@VadoVoodoo The police have reasonable grounds, like stating section 19 which gives a constable power to seize any electronic devices, over an allegation using a computer. That is over reach, the police have too much free reign. They always justify it based on their perception.
Another sad, pathetic, police officer (Detective) who struggled to contain her ego even when informed by her colleagues about his intentions. She couldn’t even recite the actual law she was about to arrest him for. The terrorism thing. Pfffttt!
Right at the end, ask the question, Is what I'm doing illegal? No its not, if anyone thought there were major security issues then there would be laws brought in that said you can't film police stations in public
How dare the silly foreign bird shout at you like that! Is that another Eastern European who grew up under a totalitarian state and wants the same here?
If that woman is a detective sergeant then we as tax payers are being ripped off, she hasn’t got a clue and will just cost taxpayers money with her illegal detentions
Love the uniform officer.. to DS you want to sign your name on a lawsuit, PSD and IOPC complaint.. leave me out of it.. 😂😂😂 He seems to be the only smartest and clued up officer..👌
"IF you haven't done anything"... "IF"... they already presume you're guilty and that means they don't care about the law, reasonable grounds or your rights 😡
@@1akw No they don't, they just need to quote the correct legislation which is what Koleeberks was trying to get her to do but she obviously didn't have a clue so was trying to get consent to look at it. Under section 43 of the terrorism act a constable can request to see any footage or photos on any device but NEED reasonable ground to suspect someone is a terrorist first. Without reasonable ground the search would be very unlawful and I think she knew that which is why she was trying to get Koleeberks to just consent.
File a complaint. You were assaulted by someone’s ego, not someone working within the law. Does anyone think she’ll learn? Next auditor will receive the same, guilty until ego is sufficiently massaged.
Mate massive respect to you I’m from manny and it’s full of it round here I support a good handful of you auditors now so please keep ya heads high and keep on rollin 🤟👍👍👍
No identification, battery, Illegal detainment, false imprisonment. Is this how the police challenge law abiding citizens now? Another example of an officer thinking they can do whatever they want, and stuff whether it is legal and whether they are following procedures correctly. She is a disgrace, needs some serious retraining and has tarnished the reputation of every decent officer in that station. Police want to regain public confidence? Don't make me laugh.
i tell the cop or so u want to take my phone without a warrant good luck with that fool cuz i want a lawyer & u tell them that u want my phone without a warrant & etc
Not a clue, absolutely disgusting behaviour. Kudos to the officer who had knowledge. Either way, it isn’t illegal, it is perfectly legal and that is the bottom line. The public have a right to film the police and these people would have that taken away if they could, and then there would be real trouble.
At 12:50 Silly Detective: "We thought you were going to make off, we do have powers" I'm allowed to "make off", I wasn't detained and you also didn't use any powers.
This was very satisfying to watch. It proves that you auditors are starting to make an impact. My first audit is tomorrow in Wrexham hope I dont buckle under the pressure
When she asked why are you doing this I thought you could of said to catch people like you out for detaining me with no grounds and not even knowing what section it was and she was a high ranking officer
I love that people can come from foreign countries and tell us in this country what you can not do in their country and try to apply it to the UK, It is so international!
She has a right to ask and you have the right to tell her where to go. Sure it would be a safer place without officers like this who clearly don't know the law any one else who didn't know the basic requirements of there job would have been fired long ago.
"I didn't know any of this..." you shouldn't be treated any different if you're 'well known'. Glad she didn't know who you were so you can see the true reaction
To use the powers under the terrorism act you need suspicion of terrorism, she has been advised he is known and not a threat under the act, yet she still pushes for the terrorism act detention. How to totally embarrass yourself, maybe stop abusing the powers you have, until you have grounds. How did she make DS? She doesn't even sound the full shilling.
Mate if someone films outside your house you can't go out, grab them and demand to see their phone. Exactly the same principle here. You are far too polite to these paranoid idiots.
![[LIVE] : ONE ลุมพินี 87 วันนี้!! คู่เอก "ก้องชัย vs โชคปรีชา"](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/YN6e7HVnekw/mqdefault.jpg)
Follow my instagram.com/berks_2h/
$KOLEE telegram crypto channel - t.me/koleecoin
Follow my editiors channel : th-cam.com/channels/MQjHYbwFrF4Rd9JfLbeu_g.html
Discord where we can chat- discord.gg/ESFcXccHmA
Feel free to donate to help cover petrol/food costs that go into making these videos!
www.paypal.me/koleeberks
She is a complete joke, " please just bear with me, please come with me, please put your phone away"
How did she make it past PCSO?
She obviously blew the cheif inspector
How did she make it past girl guide
@@doonie8287 content getting dead now they clued up
@@tonysoprano9754 yeah it seems that way
How did she make it past PCSO? On her knees !
Her demeaner was that of a small child who had been told, "no", by their parent, so they respond by continually asking the same question again in that really annoying tone, in the hope that the parent will eventually just give in to shut them up.
Loved it when you told her that you had spoken to the front desk & he had given you permission… her face…priceless
@gurpreet daliwell Yes, game set & match
Yep..."Why didn't you tell me that?"
Was funny lol. Tbh that area he is in forest gate is a complete dump. Usually struggle to find a English person there
💯🤣🤣🤣
😂😂😂
Omg! That copper admitting what you are doing was “perfectly legal” in front of those plain clothes idiots, really stuck in his throat 🤣🤣🤣
11:25 Personally, I won't be (assisting you). Smart man, he doesn't believe you are a terrorist so won't abuse the powers. Well done.
there he was saying he learned nothing from watching audits .
But still said do what you want. Not good enough. No grounds for terrorism here.
Yep, epic interaction
Its a little more serious than that the DS has just exposed herself to a civil claim for battery which will cost the MET probably 3 grand or more. CRIMBODGE channel here has been taken down but he has an excellent Website and for a £5 explains exactly how to do it. Hit em in the pocket they will start making sure that their officers enforce the law as its written in the Statute (Gov.uk).
He knows he isn’t a terrorist but would allow his colleague to use section 43 😂😂😂
Hey, no-one can accuse that DS of abusing police powers... She didn't even know what the powers were.
She realised she had messed up and couldn't back peddle fast enough
that and the little girly voice
if you're silent, the moment the costable drops the "perfectly legal" bomb, you can actually hear her farting out a big brown color pencil right in her underwear.
That copper was actually sound, he knew you, knows the score as he said it's legal. He gave her fair warning.
Respect to him and from me that does not come easy
True, but after that he descended into rubbish questions and concerns like under covers in jeopardy it’s unusual it’s not nice etc then wandered off without manning up and resolving or directing miss flutter pants . . Completely gutless and useless
Agreed
The sergeant there was backpeddling so hard trying to regain control of the situation. That's a clear illegal detention right there, didn't even specify the legislation - and actually they never confirmed at the end you were undetained either
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂the look on her face when the educated officer in uniform told her "you can if you want but I personally won't be" quality 👍
If the officers are reading this, this is why people audit, to hold you accountable for your actions and record any and all interactions with law enforcement. You are not law makers you are law enforcers, just because you don't like something it does not mean we have to obey your directives. Learn the law and stop abusing legislation set out to detain and arrest criminals, they were not designed for you to obtain details because you feel like it.
Someone needs to get a petition going to get all police officers in the uk covered with their own public liability insurance so when we sue them for assault and false imprisonment it will be them that foot the bill and not the tax payer.
“If you wanna detain him YOU can, I WONT BE, I’ll be here to assist but that’s it. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
The police justify their actions based on their own view, that is why he said that. They don't group, and say that is wrong or right. They are trained to follow what the other does, based on that person's outlook.
@Peter Pan facts hahaha
Which in itself is wrong. His response should have been "If you wanna detain him you can BUT I will then have to uphold the law and protect him from your illegal actions sarge".
@@creakygnome5084 True but the sarge woulda torn him a new one for doing what was right?
@@stoopingfalcon891 You got that right. sarge is God to the ranks below and whipping boy to the senior ranks above and thats a direct quote from a real sarge long since retired. Get the wrong side of your sargents (2 per relief) and they could make life hell for you. I got a bollocking from my sergeant after a Letter of Commendation had been couriered in from a grateful father whose young son I had found. My crime was whilst recounting what had happened to my Duty Inspector (Reporting on letter to Chief Constable) I stated that I had used my own initiative and the circumstances to deduce that the boy wouldn't be far away from his home address. He was found by me about 15 yards from their boundary fence some 4 1/2 hours after going missing from school. Sarge was at the school with most of the relief which had been well searched by the kids and teachers at the school after they discovered that he was missing.
She's a detective sergeant and she doesn't have a clue. It's concerning that people in higher places are just as clueless as fresh out of training.
You need two things to be a DS either brains or a vagina or both!
A detective sergeant who gets schooled by a PC. Our force is a joke.
Was thinking the very same thing lol
Seems like she only works in the office and never out in the streets dealing with different sorts of people and events.
Maybe she's a gender diversity appointment.
So what's new, I'm a retired sergeant from a provincial force the standing joke has always been if nobody else will have you the MET will take anybody.
Ahh you beat me to it I was going to write the same thing lol
And she does the walk of shame!! hahahaha, I am here from Live Free 👍
“I thought you was going to walk off” she didn’t seem to realise that you was allowed to.
In spite of you asking her numerous times, she never did state what law she was using to detain you.
Frankly it’s disgusting that we are paying Detective sargeant wages to a complete muppet who doesn’t even know how to detain someone.
BOOM 👌
I think she'd need more than "you're a man with s camera" to arrest you under section 43.
It's not evidence of any wrongdoing and she'd need much more to get a conviction under terrorist legislation.
A jury would laugh at that sort of stupidity.
You should consider buying an old, but serviceable, phone/camera to do these audits in case they do seize it as evidence.
Fair play to that copper distancing himself from any illegal arrest/search. Wish they all were like him and able to speak up when they believe another officer is doing something wrong.
Fully agree wish they did that here they all gang up
He said, he would assist her if she wanted to search him, he didn't distance himself from an illegal search/arrest. And if the shit hit the fan he still would have used force.
He knows hes being watched by 1000's of people and he didnt wanna make a dick of himself to his mates, however thats the first time ive seen it to that extent. anyway the DS hadnt got a clue what she was doing.
@@MrJonny2324 he has to assist if she were to still pursue it however what he did was tell her categorically what Kolee does and that he would not be doing anything except to assist her. He made it so that she could not do anything else.
What you forget is, that is one constable's view, somebody else would see it differently.
She needs to be dealt with accordingly. Assault and attempted theft is the laws she broke. Really I think police need to get educated on what powers they really have and haven't got before jumping in at the deep end. You can legally do what you were doing but she doesn't know the law as well as you do. You would think it would be the other way around but it sadly isn't!!
Office plod seemed decent, what's with the female coppers attitude though?
It's in the eyes. It's an illness of the mind.
Cameras are not Illegal ! Officer needs to go to work! She's violating your rights ! She is suspicious ! Report her! Violating her oath. Female is soliciting you!
And that is the calibre of detective we have to keep us safe, she didn’t have a scooby doo.
In all my years of being in the legal profession I’ve seen some numpties but she has made it into my top ten.
An affirmative hire/promotion.
They couldnt detect a cold if they had one
If they mention terrorism , their first move should be , ARMED RESPONCE UNIT.
I think you missed a trick there, The PC who knew you said "What are you trying to achieve" exactly that, Awareness that is not illegal to film in public and you need grounds to use Section 43 which the Lady didnt understand. Now she kinda does. Although im sure she will try it again with the next person
I was thinking the same thing
My thinking too
Ditto
Something flicked in his head at that moment and he was lost for words is the vibe i got
I was waiting for that response
Man man man, a DS trying to detain under a section she's not even aware of, 🤦
Kolee keeping it real with free tuition 💪
PLEASE VISIT THIS STATION AGAIN! THE COPS THERE ARE VERY RUDE.
A Detective without an effing clue. I wonder what her detection rate is? No clear detention and no clear identification when asked. Clueless all round.
Classic, you can detain him if you want. You're a sergeant. But I wouldn't. This is one of the best yet. Even had permission from front desk. Lol
She has no clue. What an embarrassment.
@11.06 “it’s entirely up to you”
Or in other words….nah sarge I’m not that dumb, but you crack on though if you want a lawsuit”😂😂
😂 and u can tell she really just wanted to check that phone "just incase" lol
@@zcharged8294 or she was hoping for nude pics of Kolee (sorry if you read this mate!) 😆😆😄😄😉😉😯😯
From her point of view this is when back up comes along and shafts you.
Fair play to that uniform boyo. He'd got your number right off that bat. Be like " ah it's kolee, best not tangle with"
THAT LADY NEEDS THE SACKING. IF ANYONE ASKS WHY THESE VIDEOS NEED TO BE DONE, SHOW THEM THAT LADY. LOOK AT HOW QUICKLY POWER CORRUPTS
Of course she doesn’t deserve sacking she’s doing what the rest do question him about what he’s doing , unless you know of koleeberks like the police guy who knew him and knew that he does auditing
‘Can you come with me’ Remember what your mum told you about going anywhere with strangers.
It can’t be unusual if he knows that you do lots of auditing.
How did she become a DS? So many unlawful things and she was literally begging you “please please”
I'll give you one guess how she became a DS.
@@kennyandrews2630 Dropping pens under the desk of her superiors?
Bet that Mask hasn't been the only thing slipping down.
I’m always shocked at where your subs are, you’re by far the best auditor. Always so composed, and well versed. Your generosity, and kind nature extended to our police operatives, knows no bounds 😂
Who is this silly uneducated “detective”
Hats off to that guys. This is how officer should be 11:00
only beacuse he knows its an audit ,and he doesnt want to look a fool or get sued ..before he knew what an audit was ,who knows what he would have done.
He had to enlighten the two dunces.
Live free sent me and I subscribed for more great videos of corruption.
Keep up the great work man👊👍💚💛❤
12:05 "What do you gain out of this?" asks the reasonable copper. The answer is that Kolee gains nothing except hassle, arrest, false criminal charges, unlawful detention, assault, to name a few. Kolee does get a bit of beer money but not enough to compensate him for the crimes against him by the police. Kolee does it for the benefit of all of us.
lol seems our man kolee is a bit of a sadomasochist
@@broker.2719 hdjddjdjdj
@@C87-q9j nah actually they jus got my phones lol I’ll be posting again soon dw
Crimes against him hahahahaha
THE MONEY SHOT WALK OF SHAME
That woman either ignored the letter from the police commissioner, didn’t understand it, or blatantly ignores it. She seems very proud of her “powers.”
I think she knows the law however she was trying to escalate things so that she can arrest!
Jesus how corrupt is that female cop,,and for how many years has is been abusing her powers, ALWAYS RECORD COPS 📸 EXPOSÉ THEM ALL 🤬
Couldn’t say this was your best audit Kolee, all respect due to the amazing auditor you are. You let this female officer assault you without grounds and then nearly look through your phone, all without giving her grounds for thinking you’re a terrorist. You shouldn’t of been as nice to her as you were, if the camera wasn’t rolling I bet this would of gone very differently
I'd let THAT Female Police Officer 'Assault Me; any ol' day of the week - I'd be beaming like the sun
And I'd supply her with "facial sun cream" ☄ ☄
Scary the total incompetence of the DS. I’ve seen dinner ladies more switched on.
That officer was a legend, put her right in her place lmao "I won't be detaining him personally". Smart guy.
Please pursue legal action, I have been watching a lot of audits where the police clearly step over the line, and I may be wrong here, but there seems to be no consequences for their actions. I am just worried that these audits become exercises in futility if they are more or less just getting away with it. Your rights were 100% violated in this encounter, this can't be a whoops my mistake situation... Good luck moving forward and keep it up.
i feel that the big auditors(AB etc) in the UK have been visited by the men in suits recently because they all seem to have an air of futility and softness about their interactions in the past month or so....
The PC knew more than the detective sergeant wow get him promoted
Not really, he’s just doing the job we pay him for, it’s the DS that needs demoting…
Top bloke
@@barrymay4017 I meant he should be in her spot if anything but I hear what your saying
Yep Top Lad that PC in uniform!!
I’ve never felt so awkward when watching an Audit - that lady got me. Fair play to the other copper he played it smart and deescalated the sitch
for once the uniformed officers were good... those 2 plan clothed were muppets as per usual
SHE SHOULD HAVE BEEN ARRESTED FOR HAVING A BRAIN THAT WAS OUT OF DATE. AND BEING VERY SILLY .
Female DS was like a 'rabbit in the headlights' .She wanted to detain & search, but not under and official section. Never seen someone beg so much when they have all the power. 😂
To be fair the back up PC team could have still made her carry out the detain & search just out of spite, but were reasonable & clued up enough to know what your rights are.
What's she worried about him filming for if they're upto nothing 😂😂😂
First time I’ve seen an officer actually school a detective 😂 that was brilliant
So happy you you did this audit at forest gate police station and the muppets that work there..... can you please audit basildon police station and magistrates court next door .. they need educating bably
If they are concerned about hostile reconnaissance from a man with a camera, why are they not concerned about the building across the street? Some terrorist can rent one the rooms on the second floor, set up cameras and record the ins and outs of the police 24/7. This female copper and her male companion did not adhere to covid restrictions. She was very aggressive and eager to go hands on while saying she had the power to do so but never citing a specific law or statute. She also didn't know what he was doing was legal. She may have the right to question behavior but she lacks the ability to assess the situation and showed no regard to individual rights of kolee.
this one is so so deep, man. you are exceptional in all your words and actions. @ 12:00, firstly you said "i don't like doing this" (intimating you are doing it because it is a necessary public service), and when the very decent human asked you "what do you gain out of this", your silence, and their apparent penny-drop moment (although maybe that's just my perception) was very beautiful.
"Prior knowledge" - was the key point in this. Only one Cop had the foresight to be observant n informed. The Detective should be demoted to Tea Bag Lady, no clue of what Detective actually means yet titled as that - what a damn blunder. People put in positions if power by people who have no clue of reality n the law should not be running an institution that is clueless about the law it enforces..
Spot on
How did that DS pass the promotion exam and her other detective colleague. She came out with all the usually platitudes about hostile reconnaissance and the filming of undercover officers. She had a break of luck when clued up uniformed officer turned up and tried to advise her in a discrete way that he would not participate in any way if she used a Section 43 Terrorism Act 'Stop and Search' . Taboo if a PC contradicts a sargent (God within the forces). Still by then the illegal detention and battery had taken place so a nice earner for you for a days work. Still its the only way to get the Police to respect the rights of the citizens that they swore to SERVE AND PROTECT and to get them to actually learn the laws that they are paid to enforce. Sadly things haven't improved from 50 years ago !
Uniformed officer and front desk guy were sound, those detectives are clueless though. Reassuring that they're investigating complex crimes with that lack of knowledge of the law
That there was a pure madness, she needs to pattern up and learn her job, how can she say “what would you usually do now with this man” she was clueless.
As for that other officer, he was class, the way he said “I won’t personally be detaining him” made her look even more stupid.
So Mr “Tik Tok 🤣”sensation, how does it feel to be recognised from Scotland Yard to Forrest Gate 👏🏼👍🏼🌍
fancy that woman not knowing who you are, that's like working in a record shop and not knowing who elvis is.
AHA !
LOOOOOL
OR (I'll admit I've stolen this! 😊😉) It's like giving somebody a steering wheel and saying you now own a car 😄😊😉
@@topcat1358 Elvis The Pelvis
@@topcat1358 costello of course! ;-)
Anyone who is an officer who isn't involved enough in the community to know what auditing is by now, shouldn't be one.
Although they do give great content while making idiots of themselves, it's not very reassuring to the viewing public.
the uniformed officer was sensible. tbh, you should have reminded all of them about the memo that was sent by the National Police Chiefs Council NPCC
He missed a lot of good points during this interaction 👎
He never brings the NPCC guidence which is so stupid. His audits are getting much worse when it comes to educating these tyrants. He spends most of his agreeing with them.
Bro when they say they're detaining you, you gotta go straight in with 'let me know when I am no longer detained' and then keep asking what powers they're using to detain you. this way you know exactly how long you've been wrongfully detained for if u ever wanna sue.
You’re the auditor that always gets detained! Love how the police officer that wanted to look at your phone, didn’t have a clue what she was doing the silly woman!
The police are getting worse, put in a complaint. The divide between police and public is getting worse by this action of the police.
The lady copper is worried there 'are other tings' on your phone - pictures of your family, maybe a recipe for Roast Pork, pictures of a bacon sandwich. A cookbook? Maybe you are into international finance and have a banking app? Or even worse, you have a Bitcoin wallet which could have evidence of your guilt of something which you are obviously innocent of until they prove otherwise.
I agree, she wanted to look at the phone because she wanted to do nothing more than a fishing expedition and have a good nose through his personal life to teach him a lesson about who has the authority here. Despicable.
Perhaps the thick DS was hoping to find terrorist blue prints and a list of Americas most wanted and their phone numbers like all terrorists carry?
@@VadoVoodoo One of the most silliest statements made is the confusion between the UK system, and the American system. The only reason the ignorant employee said that was relating to spying. The police follow a system of rules when looking at somebody's phone, if they were to download it, who knows on what could be recovered assuming there was a crime.
@@blenderocean But tbere was no evidence nor reasonable ARTICUABLE suspicion of a crime so any search would have been unlawful and a violation of civil rights. That is UK law too.
@@VadoVoodoo The police have reasonable grounds, like stating section 19 which gives a constable power to seize any electronic devices, over an allegation using a computer. That is over reach, the police have too much free reign. They always justify it based on their perception.
Looks like the back gate is the side gate. Actually, the back gate may be the front gate for vehicles. It's not clear where the front gate is.
How does a sergeant not know what the law is before putting hands on. How are the PCs supposed to know if their managers don't. Awful.
Another sad, pathetic, police officer (Detective) who struggled to contain her ego even when informed by her colleagues about his intentions. She couldn’t even recite the actual law she was about to arrest him for. The terrorism thing. Pfffttt!
"I need to violate your rights sir, please, sir"
What a cupid stunt...again keep it up mate
Right at the end, ask the question, Is what I'm doing illegal? No its not, if anyone thought there were major security issues then there would be laws brought in that said you can't film police stations in public
Shes been handed that job thanks to daddy or mummy.
She had to as a pc what to do with you. Pmsl. Wee feeble.
New sub btw, Big Up Live Free 💯👍
How dare the silly foreign bird shout at you like that! Is that another Eastern European who grew up under a totalitarian state and wants the same here?
If that woman is a detective sergeant then we as tax payers are being ripped off, she hasn’t got a clue and will just cost taxpayers money with her illegal detentions
Love the uniform officer.. to DS you want to sign your name on a lawsuit, PSD and IOPC complaint.. leave me out of it.. 😂😂😂
He seems to be the only smartest and clued up officer..👌
"IF you haven't done anything"... "IF"... they already presume you're guilty and that means they don't care about the law, reasonable grounds or your rights 😡
Don't think you can be detained lawfully just for a chat !
Plus they need a court order to go through a phone
@@1akw no they don't if you are being searched under s43 of the terrorism act. They have the power there and then to search your phone
@@1akw No they don't, they just need to quote the correct legislation which is what Koleeberks was trying to get her to do but she obviously didn't have a clue so was trying to get consent to look at it. Under section 43 of the terrorism act a constable can request to see any footage or photos on any device but NEED reasonable ground to suspect someone is a terrorist first. Without reasonable ground the search would be very unlawful and I think she knew that which is why she was trying to get Koleeberks to just consent.
"A chat" is police begining an investigation. 😜🤔👌
@@1akw That is to remove data.
File a complaint. You were assaulted by someone’s ego, not someone working within the law. Does anyone think she’ll learn? Next auditor will receive the same, guilty until ego is sufficiently massaged.
Police on our streets that don't know the law. Like professional footballers not knowing the offside rule.
Mate massive respect to you I’m from manny and it’s full of it round here I support a good handful of you auditors now so please keep ya heads high and keep on rollin 🤟👍👍👍
No identification, battery, Illegal detainment, false imprisonment. Is this how the police challenge law abiding citizens now? Another example of an officer thinking they can do whatever they want, and stuff whether it is legal and whether they are following procedures correctly. She is a disgrace, needs some serious retraining and has tarnished the reputation of every decent officer in that station. Police want to regain public confidence? Don't make me laugh.
that officer is on the ball! good lad! hahaha
This has to be one of the best audits I’ve seen yet. That officer was smart 😂
i tell the cop or so u want to take my phone without a warrant good luck with that fool cuz i want a lawyer & u tell them that u want my phone without a warrant & etc
Ds what a clown she is hasn’t got a clue..when will a copper come out and say oh he’s only filming it’s legal and walk back in .
Hey Kolee, love watching your videos. Your very articulate and come across very professionally. You are by far my favourite auditor.
Not a clue, absolutely disgusting behaviour. Kudos to the officer who had knowledge. Either way, it isn’t illegal, it is perfectly legal and that is the bottom line. The public have a right to film the police and these people would have that taken away if they could, and then there would be real trouble.
At 12:50 Silly Detective: "We thought you were going to make off, we do have powers" I'm allowed to "make off", I wasn't detained and you also didn't use any powers.
This was very satisfying to watch. It proves that you auditors are starting to make an impact. My first audit is tomorrow in Wrexham hope I dont buckle under the pressure
Well she made a proper Charlie of herself - for posterity - didn't she!!? One for the station Christmas party 😊
She didn't un-detain you! You should have asked her In front of everyone if you're still detained.
these are becoming an exercise in views nowadays. very sloppy
When she asked why are you doing this I thought you could of said to catch people like you out for detaining me with no grounds and not even knowing what section it was and she was a high ranking officer
I love that people can come from foreign countries and tell us in this country what you can not do in their country and try to apply it to the UK, It is so international!
She has a right to ask and you have the right to tell her where to go. Sure it would be a safer place without officers like this who clearly don't know the law any one else who didn't know the basic requirements of there job would have been fired long ago.
"I didn't know any of this..." you shouldn't be treated any different if you're 'well known'. Glad she didn't know who you were so you can see the true reaction
The police need to move with the times..the right to stand on a public footpath and video should be taught to all police..
To use the powers under the terrorism act you need suspicion of terrorism, she has been advised he is known and not a threat under the act, yet she still pushes for the terrorism act detention.
How to totally embarrass yourself, maybe stop abusing the powers you have, until you have grounds.
How did she make DS? She doesn't even sound the full shilling.
Mate if someone films outside your house you can't go out, grab them and demand to see their phone. Exactly the same principle here. You are far too polite to these paranoid idiots.
If someone filmed my house from outside I will go out and smash them in the face but if it's a work place then it's different
@@brandonandtom941 did you beat up the google man ?
@@BG-ef8sk no only middle aged men with a bad camera phone
@@brandonandtom941 And you'd deserve every fucking year in prison you get.
And every tooth knocked out, of course
She didn’t have a clue what she was doing or what day it was guy in uniform was trying to save her so bad 😂😂😂
The DS is not Iooking too good on this one