The model of gulf countries works and the locals are happy with 90% 80% immigrants into their country. No citizenship, only in very special circumstances
Does anyone know what the immagration figures are, accounting for our leaving the EU? The numbers peaked a great deal after Brexit, but I assume a good chunk of that is because EU citizens were now being counted in a way they previously weren't. This was made clear during Brexit when we realised we had many more EU nationals in the country than first estimated. Does anyone have a graph for migration with EU nationals removed?
Ask yourself why home prices have skyrocketed? Most Australian politicians hold huge real estate portfolios hence the reason why no government is willing to scrap negative gearing & reassess the capital gains tax. How politicians are allowed to vote on these issues is beyond me, there is obviously conflict of interest. Politicians should recuse themselves on voting on issues that aid & abet them to get richer but that would mean having an empty chamber when it came to voting time. We have a member of the opposition who is an ex cop who invested heavily in child care centres, where he got that type of money is questionable, he then voted with his government to increase government child care subsidies substantially. If those facts do not constitute conflict of interests I don’t know what does.
I'm getting rather bored by the shallowness of the conversation around these issues. Not one advocate of restricting citizenship or human rights ever seems to get any deeper than waving a slogan like it's their favourite sock. But let's try and test the argument, shall we? Disenfranchising voters who aren't British citizens would disenfranchise people in Northern Ireland who have freely exercised their British constitutional right (under the Belfast/Good Friday Agreement) to take Irish but not British citizenship while remaining an equal peer of others who choose to identify as British or both Irish and British (similar issues exist for Commonwealth citizens whose rights descend from before the independence of their nation from Britain). Further the commentator appears to hold a blithe disregard (or unawareness) of the fact that electoral franchise is a devolved issue in both Scotland and Wales, both of whom now allow voting rights to almost all permanent residents regardless of citizenship and this cannot be changed by the UK Government without overriding those devolved powers. Similar on the HRA - this cannot be repealed in Northern Ireland without renegotiation of the B/GFA (something that won't happen) so isn't within the unilateral gift of the UK Government and I've yet to see ANY advocate of repeal come up with a solution short of Irish reunification (which few of the advocates appear to support). Making human rights conditional and only for "people we like" risks one day being found to be on the other side of the line so my question for the commentator: Which human right within the HRA do you, personally, no longer wish to enjoy the protection of?
How then do you deal with the changing age demographics within the country? Especially if these changes disincentivises high skilled immigrants? Or don’t not believe that’s an issue
@TG-pk2vi don’t you get it yet? Globally governments created the shortage of skills. They needed to do that to import millions of workers under the guise of labour shortage, it’s part of the agenda. I believe the UK is much the same as Australia now. Too many people being imported creating a housing shortage that has seen houses & rents skyrocket in prices. Politicians are loving it as they all have huge real estate portfolios. F**king corrupt bastards all pushing the crap that we need skilled labour, why? Because our government many years ago closed our technical colleges where kids who weren’t interested in academia did their trade certificates. If you haven’t realised by now the agenda is to replace local population with migrants, reduce wages & conditions fought for by many & now the exorbitant price of homes caused because of demand & undersupply are all intentional. Bought to you globally by our corrupt governments who are just puppets of Corporate greed. They do as they are told and everything they do is intended to destroy our way of life, our standards of living & to provide a good life for our kids. The farm tax has been introduced to remove wealth from the next generation. Governments want you to have NOTHING, that is the agenda. All western governments are f**king corrupt. Ask yourself how politicians get so rich on meagre salaries? The paper bags of money they receive to make the right decisions that make the rich richer, that remove any wealth from the middle classes is how they build their wealth. Doesn’t matter what country you live in you can’t avoid the corruption as it is global.
It's simple, stop interfering with those countries internal poltics and lecturing them on how to control extremists in their countries. If you cant handle people with different backgrounds and faith, then even others can't. Stop acting like a saint in front of camera, everything will be fine.
The model of gulf countries works and the locals are happy with 90% 80% immigrants into their country. No citizenship, only in very special circumstances
Don't forget that the expats (since it's non whites we are talking about, colored slaves) don't pay any tax there.
I don't know what shite I watched but the algorithm brought me here
Does anyone know what the immagration figures are, accounting for our leaving the EU? The numbers peaked a great deal after Brexit, but I assume a good chunk of that is because EU citizens were now being counted in a way they previously weren't. This was made clear during Brexit when we realised we had many more EU nationals in the country than first estimated. Does anyone have a graph for migration with EU nationals removed?
Ask yourself why home prices have skyrocketed? Most Australian politicians hold huge real estate portfolios hence the reason why no government is willing to scrap negative gearing & reassess the capital gains tax. How politicians are allowed to vote on these issues is beyond me, there is obviously conflict of interest. Politicians should recuse themselves on voting on issues that aid & abet them to get richer but that would mean having an empty chamber when it came to voting time.
We have a member of the opposition who is an ex cop who invested heavily in child care centres, where he got that type of money is questionable, he then voted with his government to increase government child care subsidies substantially. If those facts do not constitute conflict of interests I don’t know what does.
I'm getting rather bored by the shallowness of the conversation around these issues. Not one advocate of restricting citizenship or human rights ever seems to get any deeper than waving a slogan like it's their favourite sock. But let's try and test the argument, shall we?
Disenfranchising voters who aren't British citizens would disenfranchise people in Northern Ireland who have freely exercised their British constitutional right (under the Belfast/Good Friday Agreement) to take Irish but not British citizenship while remaining an equal peer of others who choose to identify as British or both Irish and British (similar issues exist for Commonwealth citizens whose rights descend from before the independence of their nation from Britain).
Further the commentator appears to hold a blithe disregard (or unawareness) of the fact that electoral franchise is a devolved issue in both Scotland and Wales, both of whom now allow voting rights to almost all permanent residents regardless of citizenship and this cannot be changed by the UK Government without overriding those devolved powers.
Similar on the HRA - this cannot be repealed in Northern Ireland without renegotiation of the B/GFA (something that won't happen) so isn't within the unilateral gift of the UK Government and I've yet to see ANY advocate of repeal come up with a solution short of Irish reunification (which few of the advocates appear to support).
Making human rights conditional and only for "people we like" risks one day being found to be on the other side of the line so my question for the commentator: Which human right within the HRA do you, personally, no longer wish to enjoy the protection of?
How then do you deal with the changing age demographics within the country? Especially if these changes disincentivises high skilled immigrants?
Or don’t not believe that’s an issue
@TG-pk2vi don’t you get it yet? Globally governments created the shortage of skills. They needed to do that to import millions of workers under the guise of labour shortage, it’s part of the agenda. I believe the UK is much the same as Australia now. Too many people being imported creating a housing shortage that has seen houses & rents skyrocket in prices. Politicians are loving it as they all have huge real estate portfolios. F**king corrupt bastards all pushing the crap that we need skilled labour, why? Because our government many years ago closed our technical colleges where kids who weren’t interested in academia did their trade certificates. If you haven’t realised by now the agenda is to replace local population with migrants, reduce wages & conditions fought for by many & now the exorbitant price of homes caused because of demand & undersupply are all intentional. Bought to you globally by our corrupt governments who are just puppets of Corporate greed. They do as they are told and everything they do is intended to destroy our way of life, our standards of living & to provide a good life for our kids. The farm tax has been introduced to remove wealth from the next generation. Governments want you to have NOTHING, that is the agenda.
All western governments are f**king corrupt. Ask yourself how politicians get so rich on meagre salaries? The paper bags of money they receive to make the right decisions that make the rich richer, that remove any wealth from the middle classes is how they build their wealth. Doesn’t matter what country you live in you can’t avoid the corruption as it is global.
Labour shortage created by governments to give them a reason to import millions of people to create division & destroy middle classes.
It's simple, stop interfering with those countries internal poltics and lecturing them on how to control extremists in their countries.
If you cant handle people with different backgrounds and faith, then even others can't.
Stop acting like a saint in front of camera, everything will be fine.
WE can be crude, must be crude. refinement can be when control is established. Just blanket rules and GFY being called racist.